MIGO Goods issue ref. to order error in SAP

Hi,
I have created a service order with IW34 or IW51, in that servie order i have use 5 items.
When i am issuing material using MB1A Ref. to order all the items in that order are coming properly and i am able to post them but same when i try to issue with MIGO i am getting message Document does not contain any selectable items and no items are coming .
  Is there any setting due to which i am not able to issue material ref. to order with MIGO, as i am not getting any error when i am doing this with MB1A.
    regards,
     zafar

MIgo checks whether the consumption is completly posted, hence it does not display you an item that is already complete.
But you can demand that SAP will even show completed items. to do this choose from menu Settings > defaults
and select the box at default all items.

Similar Messages

  • ABAP Error:Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (in MIGO-Goods issue to Production)

    Hi Experts,
    while i am doing MIGO(Goods Issue to Production Order, I am getting the below ABAP Error:
    Please give solution, It is urgent requirement.
    THE ERROR IS:
    Short text
         Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM.
    What happened?
         Error in the ABAP Application Program
         The current ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB" had to be terminated because it
          has come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    Error analysis
         During the flow of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (event for the
         initialization of an ABAP program), a condition occurred under which
         the event was to be left early. This is not permitted as it would
         result in an inconsistent status in the ABAP program.
    Trigger Location of Runtime Error
        Program /MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB
        Include /MRSS/LRAP_INT_OBF00
        Row                                     34
        Module type                             (FORM)
        Module Name                             GLOBAL_INIT
    Source Code Extract
    Line  SourceCde
        4
        5 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
        6 *&      Form global_init
        7 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
        8 *       text
        9 *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
       10 FORM global_init.
       11
       12 * local data
       13   DATA lv_badi_impl_exists TYPE flag.
       14
       15
       16 * get ref to BAdIs
       17   CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST
       18     CHANGING
       19       instance = gv_ref_badi_inter_company.
       20 *  CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
       21 * CHANGING
       22 *      instance = gv_ref_badi_rap_back.
       23 *  CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
       24 *    CHANGING
       25 *      instance = gv_ref_badi_ps_int.
         26   CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST

    Hi Rob thanks for your response.  I thought about doing an OSS note however; I would think I would need to get the problem in config corrected first as it contradicts each other.  The problem I am talking about is how they are to return material to vendor....I have never even seen this as a process in my 10 years....
    Process.....when the PO is a return to vendor PO they go to migo and choose the goods receipt and mvmt type 101 and the system will default the 161 in the item level....the two are inconsistent.  If I try to change the top level to a 161 mvmt (as this is what I am used to seeing) it gives the error that the PO is not a stock transport order... Would you agree that I should correct that problem first before creating an OSS note?

  • Problem with MIGO goods issue to a Service Order

    Hello All
    I have checked through out the forum as well as google and can not find the answer to my issue.  Please read the below details and advise....
    In MIGO; when trying to perform a goods issue to a service order (created in IW31) I get an error message the document does not contain any selectable items.  I can not get passed this.  When I use the transaction MB11, it works just fine.  I went to the allowed transactions in OMJJ to ensure MIGO was listed as an allowed transaction... and MIGO is listed so I know that is not my issue.  It is not related to the service order not being released as it is and plus if it was not released it would not work in MB11.  I need this to work for the transaction MIGO....Please someone guide me in the proper direction of what is missing.

    Hi Kimberly,
    When you post the goods issue as an unplanned goods movement against the order, the reservation is not even read, so it is never updated.
    The data that you enter manually in this unplanned goods issue does not even need to match with the data in the reservation: the material, the plant... evrything can be different. The order is just a CO Account Assignment in this case and the reservation is not processed in any moment. This way, it is not possible to close the reservation when posting this kind of unplanned goods issue, as the reservation is not even considered (and, therefore, never updated).
    It is only when you post the planned goods issue referencing the order directly when you really post your goods issue with reference to the reservation behind the order. Only in this case is when the data in the posting is checked against the reservation (the material, the plant, etc cannot be changed because they are taken directly from the reservation). Also, it is only in this case when the quantity in the posting is checked against the quantity in the reservation. If we issue the total reserved quantity, the reservation is closed automatically.
    In the first case for the unplanned goods issue there is never an automatic update of the reservation because the posting does not even consider the reservation. It is only when you post the goods movement with reference to the order (in MB1A using "To Order..." and in MIGO "Goods Issue + Order") when the reservation is taken into account in the goods movement and, therefore, updated.
    You can also refer to the SAP Library:
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/a5/6337db43a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
    It says:
    "This withdrawal is unplanned because there is no reservation to be referenced."
    An unplanned goods issue with the movement 261 and the order (working as CO account assignment object) is more or less the same as a 201 for a cost center. The cost center and the order are just CO Objects in this scenario.
    I hope this helps you further!
    Best regards,
    Esther.

  • Error while doing Good Issue for Production Order using BAPI

    Hi All,
    I am facing an error like 'u2018Content of order 1011907: MDT218AJ10 transferred to interface (IMSEG): T-86410-71".
    I have written the code as below. Please let me know what is missing when using the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'. What is the cause of this error ?
    *Action in Transaction (GM_CODE)
    *GM Code for Goods Issue for Production Order is 03
      gs_gmcode-gm_code = '03'.
    *Header Data
    *Posting date
      gs_header-pstng_date = sy-datum.
    *Document date
      gs_header-doc_date   = sy-datum.
    *Item Data
    *Material
      gs_item-material  = zptp_s_rf_migo_261-matnr1.
    *Movement Type
      gs_item-move_type = '261'.
    *Movement Indicator
      gs_item-mvt_ind   = 'F'.
    *Stock Type
      gs_item-stck_type = 'F'.
    *Plant
      gs_item-plant     = gv_plant.
    *Storage Location
      gs_item-stge_loc  = gv_str_loc.
    *Quantity
      gs_item-entry_qnt = zptp_s_rf_migo_261-menge2.
    *Unit
      gs_item-entry_uom = gv_uom.
    *ISO code for unit of measurement
      gs_item-entry_uom_iso = gv_uom.
    *Order Number
      CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT'
        EXPORTING
          input  = zptp_s_rf_migo_261-aufnr
        IMPORTING
          output = gs_item-orderid.
    *Reservation Number
      gs_item-reserv_no = gv_resv_num.
    *Reservation Item
      gs_item-res_item = gv_resv_itm.
    *Reservation Type
      gs_item-res_type = gv_resv_type.
      APPEND gs_item TO gt_item.
    Calling BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create the Material Document Number
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
        EXPORTING
          goodsmvt_header       = gs_header
          goodsmvt_code         = gs_gmcode
        IMPORTING
          goodsmvt_headret      = gs_headret
        TABLES
          goodsmvt_item         = gt_item
          goodsmvt_serialnumber = gt_serial
          return                = gt_return.
    Thanks in Advance.

    hi,
    did you look at message ?
    System says, there are differences between the interface data and the order data. It can be anything. I think you should check
    data in the interface . 
    this is the long explanation of your message :
    Diagnosis
    When calling the function module MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT or the BAPI GoodsMovement.CreateFromData (BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE) to post a goods receipt for a production order, there are differences between the interface data and the order data.
    Example: The order was created for plant 0001, but plant 0002 is passed on in the interface.
    The system checks this for the material and the order item.
    System response
    Due to this difference, the system cannot post the goods receipt.
    Procedure
    Check the data in the interface (IMSEG-WERKS, IMSEG-AUFNR). If necessary, correct the plant or the order number in the interface.
    << Moderator message - Point begging removed >>
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 6, 2012 11:24 AM

  • MIGO- Goods Issue- Order, the value is not written into Table COSP

    Hi,
      We make a substitution of wbs element of line item( BSEG-PROJK ). The wbs filed will be filled automatically when the user input a cost center or a order number.
    But we found some inconsistency in standard report S_ALR_87013558 OR CJI3.
    The following is what we have done:
    In Tcode F-02, we enter a order(e.g. A), then the WBS Element is filled automatically. when we post the document, and go to Standard report: S_ALR_87013558,
    we can see the amount in the report.
    In MIGO, we make a goods issue by order(e.g. A. Movement type is 261) , when we post, Material Document and Accounting document and Controlling document , but in report S_ALR_87013558 or CJI3. the amount is wrong, we can not see the amount we have done in MIGO.
    The movement type 201 is also wrong, the value is also not written into tabl cosp.
    But GI for project-movement type 221, the value is written into table cosp.
    Can you tell me this is wrong or right? if right, why? if wrong, how can i correct it, i need some customizing or others? or my substitution affect the result?
    Best Regards
    qingda

    Sorry, not reply these days.
    And very thanks for all your replies.
    I am a abaper, not familiar with the business.
    The business consultant want to control budget, control cost. 
    At first, he let me do a substibution in FI line item of besg-projk(WBS Element), when we he test the substitution in TCode F-02, the WBS field is filled automatically as per G/L account and Cost Center or as per G/L Account and Order, and then in Standard Report 'S_ALR_87013558', we can see the changes of the cost.
    But when biz consultant do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can not see the changes of the cost,but the value of WBS in FI Accounting Document is substituted correctly.
    And if we enter the WBS manually when we do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can see the changes of the report 'S_ALR_87013558'.
    In the original post, i was wrong, when we do a goods issue with movement type 201, the result is the same as 261, also we cant see the changes. but if we enter the wbs manually(movement type 201),the changes is write to COSP table.
    The solution about the original requirement is right or wrong?
    Thank You All.
    Best Regards
    qingda

  • Good issue to Production order - Allows it in back posting date

    Dear all,
    Good issue to Production order ( 261 Movement ), allows us to post the component in back dated eventhough stock is not avaible on that date.
    Example - Component stock on date 10.02.2010 = Zero , I made it Good receipt on date 18.02.2010 and now stock is available on date 18.02.2010.
    Now GI to Production it allows the qty on current and back Posting date also , I want control on date with error message. It should not allowed the GI for back date from 18.02.2010.
    Because of this our MB5B report shows the negetive issue qty if i post in back date.
    Waiting for reply
    Thanks and Regards,
    Saurabh

    Hi SAurabh,
    PLease check whether Negative Stock is allowed for the valuation Area (plant).
    GOTO >> SPRO >> MM>> Invetnroy management and physical inventory >> Goods issue/ Transfer Posting >> Allow Negative stock.
    Untick the Negative stock allowed for your valuation area (PLant)
    Regards,
    Pravin

  • Goods Issue to sales order

    Hi Experts,
    When doing Goods issue to sales order using movement type 231, I am getting the following warning message 'Sales order (SOBKZ = ) is not provided for this goods movement'. I think this warning is due to difference in special stock indicator in sales order and Goods issue transactions. Where should be the maintanence done, in order to prevent this warning message in future.
    Regards,
    Prasanna. R

    Dear Prasanna
    The special stock indicator is not maintained for your sales order item category in VOV7
    Hence the error
    Please maintain special stock indicator E in the item category  details in VOV7 for your item category of yours
    231 Goods issue for a customer order (without Shipping)
    I hope you are doing this only
    If you ignore this as a warning message it will hit somewhere down the process
    So better maintain it in item category
    Regards
    Raja

  • Default GL account upon goods issue to maintenance order based on activity

    Hi all,
    There's a scenario here in Plantation Industry that we require to default GL account upon goods issue to maintenance order based on activity type assigned in the order instead of only posting to consumption account, is there anyway in OBYC or user exit able to fulfill requirement mentioned?
    Thanks as advanced.

    Hello
    With help of general Modifier in combination of valuation class you can assign GL as per your wish for offset posting incase of GI to order/anything
    Example
    Transaction key-GBB
    General modification- VBR
    Valuaction Class - checked
    Dr/CR- checked
    Assign the general modifier to T code MIGO , through OMJJ
    Regards
    Dinabandhu

  • MIGO Goods issue Reg

    Hi Gurus,
    We upgraded to 6.0 from 4.5b.When I am trying with MIGO,Goods issue with Mov type 201,221,261 etc.
    System is giving error message as"Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 201 X X _ B)"
    Edited by: hanuma reddy on Mar 13, 2008 11:04 PM

    Hello Hanuma
    I would assume that this is caused by the fact that you do not specify the needed basis in the MIGO transaction.
    If you look in OMJJ for 201 movement type at folder short texts or update control, then you will see a column called Mvt for movement indicator.
    DO you see see Bs and Fs there or it is blank, if it is blank then try using other tcode as mentioned above MB1A or MIGO_GI.
    Regards
    Yogesh

  • Excess goods issue against Production order

    HI PP Gurus,
    My requirement is to block excess goods issue of raw material against a production order.
    Ex. Production order qty = 10 , For producing 10 Finish goods i require 10 raw material. When i do confirmation via CO11N  the system automatically shows GR & GI Values in Goods Movement tab. there i change GI value of RM from 10 to 20 the system takes the value and does the GR & GI.
    My requirement is that the system should not do GR & GI if the GI value is more than that is calculated at the time of creation of Prod. Order.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Deven

    Hi,
    Rstriction of excess goods issue against production order is not possible in standard setting.
    For achiving this you have to go for User exit.
    The logic should be
    In MIGO check mvt. type 261
    Pass the order through table RESB and select all the components with quantity.
    Capture the header material of order and use this as input along with the order creation date, plant and BOM application to explode function module CS_BOM_EXPLOSION.
    THis will give you the BOM components which were valid at the time of order creation.
    Now compare these BOM components with the components from RESB with quantity.
    Here conditions will come in picture
    If quantity is exactly matching then GI will be possible
    or if you want to keep tolerance limit say for 10% then accordingly you can map the condition.
    Regards
    Amit Parkhi

  • MM: Material Goods Issue to Procudtion order CO27

    Hi anybody,
          When I Material goods issue to Production order using co27. I give the Material number, qty, Storage location and batch number. But I got the error Pick List Wrong Componenets. What is the error?.
    anybody please tell me about this error?.
    Why this error coming? how to solve this error?.
    Tks
    S.Muthu.

    Hi,
    Check the BOM of the material which you are entering in the production order.
    Check which is the input material for the final produced material. send the input material.
    Or
    You can go to CO11N / CO11 and while confirming the production order you can directly click on goods movement and do a GI with 261 Mvt type.
    Thanks & regards,
    Kiran

  • MIGO - Goods Receipt against Purchase order. PO rate dispaly.

    Is it possible to display purchase order line item rate in MIGO - Goods Receipt against purchase order - Quantity tab.
    In Quantity tab - System is showing Qty in Unit of Entry, Qty in SKU, Qty in Delivery Note, Quantity Ordered, alongwith these fields we also want display of Purchase order rate/each of that line item.
    Please guide.

    BTW you are getting PO number at MIGO and clicking over that you will get entire PO then why you want PO rate display here??

  • Return under Warranty (Tracking Line only) Should we use MIGO - Goods Issue

    Return under Warranty (Tracking Line only) Should we use MIGO - Goods Issue when sending out Materials for repair or exchange under Warranty (Free)?

    Please post it in SD/MM forum.

  • Goods issue without sales order

    Hello experts,
                       1)  Goods issue without sales order (movt type 251) in T.code "MB1A"*
                               Accounting entry:- Change in stock of Fin. Goods A/c    Dr.
                                                                          To Stock of Fin. Goods A/c
                       2) Customer Invoice through T.code "FB70"
                             Accounting entry:-     Customer A/c   Dr.
                                                                 To Sales of Fin. Goods A/c.
    We are temporarily not implementing SD module, i am entering Sales transaction data. Are the above two accounting entries correct in respect to "Goods Issue" and "Customer Invoice" ?
    Regards
    Ashwin

    Thanks a lot, but if you could please tell me what impact will on the balance sheet? will the stock be reduced after goods issue
    For eg;
             Change in stock of F.G A/c Dr.    200
                           To Stock of F.G A/c               200
             Customer A/c Dr.     200
                     To Sales of F.G       200.
    Is this correct? and i have assigned cost center to "Change in stock of Fin. Goods.
    Ashwin

  • Different movement types for Goods Issue for different Order Types

    Hello Experts,
    Can we maintain different movement types for Goods Issue for different Order Types at the time of automatic creation of reservations?
    Thanks and regards,
    Satyajit

    Satyajit,
    Folow the link given,
    Re: How to add new movement types when creating reservation?
    Hope this helps you.
    SmanS

Maybe you are looking for