Minimum order value in vendor master - error message in SRM

Hello!
I am using minimum order value in ERP for some vendors and I am wondering if is it possible to get the same error message in SRM.
While creating a shopping cart in SRM if the minimum order value is not reached, the following document created is a purchasing requisition.
I would like to get the error message that the minimum order value is not reached instead of the automatic creation of a purchase requisition.
Is it possible?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Karin

Hi Karin, if you need to show an error message during Shopping Cart creation you willl need to implement badi BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI, and maybe create an RFC Function Module to check in ECC ir the minimum order value was reached or not and show the error message.
In order to control the following document you will need to implement badi BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE.
Find bellow a sample BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE - Code Approach.
Hope This Help.
Celeste

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Master:  Minimum Order Value

    I am new to supporting MM and there is a question about Minimum Order value on the Vendor Master (LFM1-MIMBW)
    It is not currently used.
    Can we simply start populating it?
    Can it be populated for only specific vendors?
    What specifically will it do for us?
    Are there draw-backs?
    Is it "safe" to test?
    Thank you all for information
    Althea

    No problem at all in using Minimum Order value in Vendor master
    It will only applicable for that vendor and only for MRP generated PR's and convertions of those PR's to PO's.
    It is populated for the only vendors in which u maintain this.
    Drawbacks  - If the requirement is of 10 pcs but minimum order value is 100 then system creates the purchase proposals for 100 which may increase ur Inventory./
    Yes it is safe as it doesnot involves any configuration and it is only a master data activity.
    Regards
    Vineet Baweja

  • Minimum order value for Purchase orders

    Hello,
    This is my requirement: -
    A condition type needs to be created for Minimum Oder Value for PO. If the PO value is say, 450 and the condition record in 500, the PO value must be adjusted to 500. If PO value is 550, then it remains 550.
       1. Condition records must be maintained.
       2. Must be calculated on whole PO (all items) and then redistributed among items in a suitable ratio.
    This is what I have already tried:-
      1. Vendor master - No use maintain minimum order value as PO price must be adjusted through condition types.
      2. Tried replicating PMIN condition type and it works but only at item level - this calculation must take place at header level. Also it works only for calculation type "Quantity".
    Please suggest how this can be implemented, hopefully through configuration only.

    Hi,
    Please use user exit MM06E005 and code accordingly. Take help of ABAPer.
    thanks and regards
    Murugesan

  • Merchandise Distribution Collective PO with SLS - Minimum Order Value

    Hi,
    My organisation is using Merchandise Distribution with SLS to generate collective PO's at our consolidation platforms before generating either STO's or PO to the supply source.
    We're utilising Cross Dock and Flow Through to support our processes but in the case of Cross Dock, we're essentially asking the supply source to pick/pack the stock for the final recipient, therefore it can be quite an expensive process for the supply source (but clearly not for us).
    Before we implemented this the supply source used to simply receive orders directly from the store and within this process we applied Minimum Order Values, as per my previous statement it can be expensive and picking a couple of small items for one store and having to put them on a pallet is not economical for them in either warehousing or transportation.
    I'm looking for some broad suggestions on how this could be achieved whilst utilising collective orders.
    Our store STO's generated by MRP (and soon enough F&R) are large STO's that are not truly supply source specific, they are consolidation platform specific and the collective orders generated off the back of them are supply source specific.
    The key issue i see is that we're asking for a select group of lines within the store STO to meet an MOV of the vendor OR that we somehow ensure that the store STO's are supply source specific and then enforce some MOV logic.
    Obviously this isn't standard but it's causing our organisation big supply issues, so any thoughts or advice would be fantastic.
    Many thanks

    Hi ,
      You can not do directly in ME59N. Check for user exit for this t code.
    Thanks,
    Venkat

  • Minimum order value for delivery

    Hi all,
    I have a problem concerning order value. I want to block orders for delivery that, based on the shipping point for the individual items, do not reach a minimum order value per shipping point. When the customer orders the next time and the combined value on a specific shipping point for the old and the new order(s) reaches the limit, a delivery document should be created. We also want to create a message to the customer saying that the first order wasn't delivered due to low value.
    Is this possible without extensive programming? A little coding in a copying rule or such is ok, but as we can handle this manually in the WH-system we don't want to put to much effort in it.
    best regards,
    Glenn

    Yes you can do that, You can use the mimum order value condition type in the pricing procedure . This condtion type check for the mimimum order value and if this is not met based on the routine in pricing procedure it will block. You can make adjustments in code for the routine for the condition type.Condition type is AMIW
    Reward points!!!!!!!!!!1
    Thanks,
    Kamal

  • Minimum Order Value for an internet sales order in the webshop

    Hi Guys,
    I have a requrement of maintaining Minimum Order Value (MOV) for an order created in B2B webshop.
    We have a condition type AMIZ which supports the same function in ECC. Will it support CRM too?
    Current implementation is CRM 5.0 and the backend is R/3 4.7.
    Thanks in advance,
    Srinivas

    Hi Srinivas,
    I believe condition type AMIZ is available in CRM by standard. So its should support. Offcourse you ll have to assign the required requirement routines / condition base values.
    Regards,
    Gaurav Gera

  • Freight calculation on minimum order value

    Forum,
    I am wondering if it is possible for Freight to be calculated on an AR Order based on an order's minimum order value. i.e. If an order with a value of <£50 then £5 Freight is applied.
    I cannot see a standard way of doing this, can this be confirmed?
    Regards,
    Juan

    Hi Juan,
    There is no standard way for it. You can try FMS.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • When i try to order prints i get an error message saying there is a problem with my network and my network is working

    when i try to order prints i get an error message saying there is a problem with my network and my network is working. How can i solve this problem?

    Try a different media. I have good luck using Maxell discs.

  • Use of minimum order value condtion AMIZ and AMIW

    I am using the above standard SAP conditions to calculate a minimum order value. It is working fine for an order with a single order item but for multi-item orders it is only doing the calcualtion for the last item.  As per standard SAP i have AMIW defined as group condtion but this seems to being ignored.
    Do I need to also fill in the Group Condtion Routine (GRLNR) on AMIZ or AMIW in order for this to work?
    Regards
    Dave Jones

    Settings in Pricing Procedure
    You must enter these condition types in the pricing procedure you use. The following settings are required:
    Condition type AMIW
    Field Value
    Statistical X
    Subtotal D
    Account key Blank
    Condition type AMIZ
    Field Value
    Alt.calc.type 13
    Account key ERS
    Using Referenced Conditions
    The minimum order value function uses referenced condition records. Condition type AMIZ references condition type AMIW. Referencing conditions means that different condition types can share the same condition records.
    Creating Condition Records
    If you use minimum order value requirements, you must create condition records for condition type AMIW. In these condition records, you specify customers and the corresponding minimum order values. During pricing, the system automatically uses these condition records as a reference for determining the relevant minimum order value surcharges (Condition type AMIZ).
    If you want to specify minimum order values that are not customer-dependent but instead are based, for example, on a sales organization, you must create a new condition table with the appropriate key.
    Dependent functions
    Condition referencing is controlled by two fields in condition type definition. For minimum order value processing, the settings for condition type AMIZ are as follows:
    Field Value
    Ref.condition type AMIW
    Ref.application V

  • Cancelling order discounts when below Customer's Minimum Order value

    I've been reading what I can find about discount conditions etc and am slightly confused as all the examples seem to relate to item line situations. We need to have a setup where all possible discounts are cancelled if the order total value is less than a given minimum order value (or threshold) related to that particular customer - and not based upon any line item value.
    We do not use Minimum Order Value as per the SAP examples given i.e. orders not accepted below the MOV and therefore surcharges added. As mentioned we use a threshold value for most customers under which discounts do not apply.
    Because of this we cannot automatically email or fax acknowledgements, and we have a massive time consuming checking operation for orders added to ensure mistakes are not made i.e. discounts applied incorrectly before the acknowledgements are sent out.
    Can anyone advise as to where I can find the path to getting a solution to this problem.
    Thanks
    Jim Jackson
    Edited by: Jim Jackson on Feb 20, 2009 9:11 AM

    I understant AMIW is Header condtion type - statistical- and has the MOV value for the specified customer.
    Maintain AMIW as Header / Line condition type.( T Code V/06)
    Create the condition reocord for AMIW with EXCLUSIVE Indicator X.(VK11)
    Then create a requirement for all the discount condition types, if the total order value = or > AMIW value then do not check the exclusion indicator( KOMP - KZNEP), ELSE check the exclusion indicator.
    ( T Code VOFM)
    During order save - automatically repirce the order in Userexit_save_document_prepare or userexit_save_document.
    If there is a partial delivery, during Invoicing if the copy control(delivery to Invoice) has carry out new pricing B, the above setting might fail. Maintain the copy control setting to copy pricing elements unchanged and redetermine taxes OR try to determine the condition values in the invoice from the order.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Sai

  • Internal Order field in Vendor Master

    Dear Experts,
    Please advise how to bring Internal Order filed in Vendor Master (FK02). I have checked screen layouts in IMG but IO filed is not there.
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Deb

    Because I want to link the Vendor with their respective budgets. In my case it is Employee Vendors. Once the budgets are assigned to an Internal Order and if it is linked to the vendor, we can control the expenses. Please advise if any other solution, if it is not as per standard.
    Thanks,
    Deb

  • Confirmation Control Key Value in vendor master overwritten by Info Record?

    Dear all
    In the standard 3rd party processing, we will use S/O to trigger PR and we then convert PR to PO. And when PO is converted, Confirmation Control Key (CCK) Z01 maintained in Vendor master purchasing view will be adopted for all the items in the PO, and in the purchase infor Record for the combination of material & this vendor, we do not maintain any CCK value there.
    However recently, the system behaves in such a way that the CCK value does not automatically show up in PO item anymore. And I have been thinking can it be the fact that the blank value of CCK in info record will overwrite the Z01 value in the CCK of vendor master? But if so, why all the past PO I have checked does not have CCK value maintained in info record but the CCK was able to appear automatically?
    An interesting fact is that if I create the PO manually by enter Vendor with CCK value Z01, Org Data, account assignment S and Item category S (both for 3rd party processing), and then the material and hit ENTER, the CCK value Z01 will appear in PO Item level under tab: Confirmation.
    However, once I enter the PLANT value in PO Overview, seem like the Empty value of CCK in info record will overwrite the existing Z01 value.
    Please advise if it is how the info record CCK work to overwrite? Also, how do I get back to the stage where the info record CCK will not overwrite as I do not want to spend time to update all the info record CCK to have Z01.
    Thanks

    Dear Manohar Raju Kanchanapally
    I do not understand why this OSS note SAP Note 909885 - ME21N: Confirmation control key not
    from vendor mentions the following:
    Symptom:
    When you create a purchase order using Transaction ME21N, the confirmation control key from the vendor master is not used, although it is maintained.
    Cause and Prerequisites:
    The symptom occurs if no confirmation control key was maintained in the existing purchasing info record.
    Solution:
    Implement the attached correction instructions as a modification.
    It is totally contrary with the General Rule that the most specific will always prevails, meaning if I do not maintain CCK value in the Info Record, it will overwrite the CCK value I maintain vendor master when I create PO using same vendor, material, purchaisng org and plant!
    Please help!
    Edited by: Daimos on Sep 17, 2009 1:22 PM
    Edited by: Daimos on Sep 17, 2009 1:22 PM

  • Vendor master error - Postal code ??

    Hi experts
    I have tried to creat import vendor , not able to create .
    Its throwing error like . "In Postal code a space must replace 5
    Message no. AM207"
    Can anybody tel me how to rectify this , this vendor is for netherlands.??
    Some body Tel me what mught be the problem??
    Thanks
    SAP_MM

    the checking rule is defined by SAP, following the country specific rules for their address and postal code layout.
    It is mainly used to check the entries made at vendor master, customer master, delivery address, plant adress etc. maintenance.
    But interfaces to external systems like VERTEX (just an example, not valid for NL, but other countries like USA have as well specific checking rules) rely on accurate entered postal codes.
    If you get business letters from a customer or vendor from NL, then they have usually printed the postal code in the right fashion, you just need to type it like it shown to avoid an error coming from the checking rule.

  • Vendor Master change  - Message 00055

    Dear Gurus,
    There is no issue in changing the vendor master, but suddenly in Change - Contact Persons screen (Vendor master change), the system prompts to Fill in all required entry fields (which is mandatory - the system pops suddenly, but its not happened previsouly). Below is the message, when i see in F1
    Please advice how to rectify the problem? Thanks in Advance
    Fill in all required entry fields
    Message no. 00055
    Diagnosis
    You have attempted to update data or start an action. However, not all required information was specified.
    System Response
    The system could not execute the action.
    Procedure
    Enter all required information. Fields in which you must enter data are prefilled with a checkmark or question mark ("?") by the system. If the current screen contains tabs, check all tabs to make sure you have filled in all required fields. Then restart the action.

    RS,
    It is possible that a mandatory field is hidden (suppressed) in the vendor master fields.  That would help explain why this just started happening.  Check "Define Account Groups with Screen Layout (Vendors)" and "Define Screen Layout per Company Code (Vendors)" in the IMG to verify the vendor master screens have not been changed.
    Regards

  • Purchase Order Text in Vendor Master

    Hello.  Does anyone have information on how to use the Purchase Order Text field in the vendor master?  Everything I have read so far is in reference to SRM.  We are currently running ECC6.0.  I entered information into the PO Text field of the Purchasing screen on the vendor master, but cannot figure out how to get it to input to the PO header text.  Any information would be greatly appreciated.

    In customizing ->material management -> purchasing -> purchase order -> texts for purchase orders -> define copying rules for header texts, choose "header text" and click on text linkages. Here you can enter for source object "vendor master", and for source text choose vendor master header text.
    This will copy text from vendor master to PO header text.

Maybe you are looking for