Miro invoice amount/qty

Dear Forum,
in miro po reference tab, there are column like invoice amount acc. to vendor and invoice qty acc. to vendor
may i know what are they meant? when can we edit these 2 column?
Thanks

Hello
These columns are used when we receive Invoice from Vendor which is having price higher than the Purcahse Order and sends Invoice with higher calue.
This fields bcome editable when we post the Invoice Reduction.

Similar Messages

  • MIRO invoice amount exceeding the blanket po overall limit

    Hello Gurus,
    I'm having trouble with invoicing against a blanket purchase order. Can anyone please explain why and when does invoice amount can exceed the blanket po amount.As I understood from the SAP documentation I should not be able to invoice for amout greater than the overall limit on the blanket PO.
    Here is what i did.
    1. I have created a blanket PR for 1000$  (Purchase requisition document type - Frame work requisition , overall limit - 1000$ , No limit flag - unchecked)
    2. I created a P.O ( Order type - Frame work order, validity start date - todays date , validity end date  - 1 year from today's date ).
    3. I checked the tolerance limits in OMR6 - for the above company code , tolearance key (LA) , check limit is blank , for tolerance key (LD) the check limit is 100.
    4. However I was able to invoice for more than 10,000$ against this Purchase order.
    My question is , am i missing anything so as the invoice amount not to exceed the blanket po amoutn ?
    My requirement is - MIRO invoice should not allow the user to post in invoice with amount exceeding the blanket p.o amout.
    Why would the MIRO invoice not checking the blanket po overall limit ?
    Appreciate your responses .
    Thanks.

    Hi Kirit,
    For tolerance key type 'LA' (Amount of blanket purchase order) , upper limit I set the check limit val to blank , and for percentage , i checked the do not check flag.
    For tolerance key type 'LD' , upper limit absolute check limit value is '100.00'.
    Where do i set the status of message , infact I'm not getting any message while posting the invoice.
    Appreciate your help.
    Thanks
    Rad

  • Invoice amount not change according to qty

    Dear Experts,
    Po qty 10 unit & price is RM1/unit.
    GR has been done for full qty.
    Now I'm going to to perform IV via MIRO. Let say I receive invoice for 4 qty. So when I enter PO no in MIRO, system pull all the information from GR that done against this PO. Now I wanated to change qty as 4 but the header amount still shows as RM10. It doesnt change according to invoice qty. And also the accounting entry reflect based on RM10 not based on invoice amount (RM4). Appreciate if you could brief me on this. How may I set this in SAP.
    rgds,
    nantha

    hi,
    the grey filed u  can make its editable mode by T code - SHD0.... here u give
    T code - Miro
    Trans variant - ZMiro and then click create button. .it will take u to the Miro transaction , where u enter ur  po number and excute.. here u can see ur amt field will be checked , just unchedked and save this variant .as well acitvate the variant.. later u can check the miro with amt option in ediable mode

  • How to set propose final invoice amount indicator in MIRO document

    Hi,
    How to set propose final invoice amount indicator in MIRO document as similar to FB60 Editing options indicators.
    Regards

    Hi,
       You can not. Having such an indicator would make no sense in MIRO.
    Kind regards

  • Difference between Invoice amount and invoice amount on psting date

    Hi Gurus,
    I had run MC$G report which dispalys Vendor/Order Qty/PO value/Gr quantity/GR value/Invoice quantity/Invoice amount (Posting date) / Invoice amount
    In this issue is Invoice amount Posting date and Invoice amount fields were not showing same value.
    Could you please tell me the difference between these 2 ??
    Reagr

    No answer

  • Internal Order - carryforward MIRO Invoice against MIGO receipt

    Hi,
    I have created an internal order (TCode KO04 & KO21 )
    Allocated full budget for year 2007
    Then I have linked it to an asset.
    A Purchase Order is made with link to the asset.
    A Goods receipt (MIGO) entry also was created against the PO
    All these transactions are done in F.year 2007
    At this point, the year-end procedure has completed.
    For the internal order, when I try to do KOCO , zero amount is shown in the carryforward
    because the actuals are posted by GRN.
    When I do KOCF, there is no commitments to be carried forward to 2008.
    Now I want to post the MIRO invoice agaist the above PO in period 01 of fyear 2008.
    The system gives error - " The internal Order has no budget in 2008"
    Since the GRN was done in 2007, I thought the Invoice should go through.
    Now why the system is checking for budget in 2008  and giving the error ?
    Help from anyone would be appreciated.

    Hi William,
    You did the following steps:
    A Purchase Order is made with link to the asset. not the internal order???
    A Goods receipt (MIGO) entry also was created against the PO
    All these transactions are done in F.year 2007
    I think the proces is now completed
    The PO create the commitment (the budget is used)
    The MIRO place the commitment on 0 an post actual values. (the budget is still used)
    Result
    No values for carryforward Budget and commitments
    Now I want to post the MIRO invoice agaist the above PO in period 01 of fyear 2008
    Is this second time that you make the same posting???
    There is no budget you used it already in 2007 and you get the error The internal Order has no budget in 2008
    I think when I follow your process the system is working perferc and make it impossible to go over budget with your second invoice

  • Error in MIRO for amount split

    Hi All,
    When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
    Pleas tell me where the problem is.
    Thanks,
    Pushkar

    Hi All,
    Thank you for support. But my problem is not getting solved. Situation is as below
    Entry is generated
    GR/IR  Dr. 100
    Tax     Dr.    25.50
    Vendor          Cr. 101.25 (90% split on total amount)
    Vendor          Cr.   11.25 (10% split on total amount)
    Items are split based on installment payment term correctly. however since tax need to be paid immediately it should split like this:
    GR/IR  Dr. 100
    Tax     Dr.    25.50
    Vendor          Cr. 115.50 (90% split of 100 GR/IR value + 25.5 of tax )
    Vendor          Cr.   10 (10% split)
    Then in OBY6 I enabled amount split. When I try to post invoice in MIRO with amount split I am getting error: Account assignment not completed for all required fields (PayT) Message no. F5A034. And in payment tab payment terms fields are missing. I have ticked 'Enable amount split' in OBY6. and have updated amount split tab.
    How to do this in system?
    Thanks,
    Pushkar
    Edited by: Pushkar Marathe on Sep 3, 2011 7:23 AM

  • Duplicate Invoice Check Not Checking the Gross Invoice Amount-

    Gurus,
    When checking for duplicate invoices in MIRO/FB60, I have made all the config and setup but still the system is not checking the gross Invoice amount field. Lets say I enter
    Invoice 1 :
                     Vendor                 X
                      Reference            123
                      Date                    10/27/2010
                      Company Code : 1111
                      Currency           : USD
                      AMOUNT           :100         and post this invoice
    I try to enter the second invoice
    Invoice 2: 
                       Vendor                 X
                      Reference            123
                      Date                    10/27/2010
                      Company Code : 1111
                      Currency           : USD
                      AMOUNT           : 90    
    I get the error message even though the AMOUNT in the second invoice is 90 which is not the same as first invoice .
    I chcked the vendor master duplicate check, made the config in spro-liv for duplicate invoice for company code, reference number and invoice date.
    The help says that after 4.6 version if all of them match, then the system wiill throw error, but in my case the amount is not matching and its still giving me an error.
    Kindly help..<< Moderator message - Please do not offer points >>
    << Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 27, 2010 4:07 PM

    Hi,
    After making the duplcate invoices chek at spro will checks the reference number of the invoice entered previouslu with that one entered later for that company code.as the first check itself failed system throws the error thinking, you are trying to enter a duplicate invoice for a  already posted invoice though how much is the amount in the second invoice .
    It will allow to enter the item details , if the dupplicate invoice check is properly configured for that company code and ref number .Did you get the error mesage after entering the details?If you get a error a message which stops furthur entry them your conf is correct, if not you may need to check back .
    Check the invoice toletrances at spro too amount.
    the below link explains you the process of dupliation in LIV.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/ce/4f3e39ea3aee02e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Regards,

  • Payment Method not in F110 for MIRO invoices

    Good day all
    One of our company codes are experiencing the following problem.
    1. The payment method is maintained in the vendor master.
    2. When doing a FB60 (sundry invoice) and the F110 (automatic payment) the payment program picks up the invoice for payment and all 100%.
    3. When doing a MIRO (LIV invoice) and then F110, the payment program issues error that no valid payment method is found for the MIRO invoice.
    4. This is happening on the same vendor account.
    What can the reason be that the payment program picks up the payment method for the sundry invoice but not for the MIRO invoice?
    Any advice or ideas?
    Thank you all.
    Lu.

    Hi Reema,
    I also faced similar problem earlier. Following could be the reasons:(These worked for me)
    1. The vendor is already picked up in an earlier run and that run is not fully processed.
    2. The amount is not yet due
    3. Sometimes, if the address in the vendor master is not fully updated, it fails to pick it up. This usually happens if you have enabled jurisdiction codes etc
    Hope this helps
    Regards,

  • TDS adjustment  for MIRO Invoice MM Period Closed.

    Hi Experts,
    We Have got issue wrt TDS entry in the system.
    Our client plant has entered downpayments for a vendor and deducted TDS on the same for the Period from Sep 11 to Dec 11
    The HO has already remitted the TDS Payments to the Government. (Outside the system)
    Meanwhile the MM Period is closed for the Period from Sep 11 to Dec 11 ( the Current Period Open are Jan 12 and Feb 12)
    Now they want to post MIRO Invoices in the system, but as the MM Period is closed they can enter invoices only for the current period.
    How can they adjust the TDS amount posted against downpayment and MIRO Invoice ?
    also should they not deduct any TDS on MIRO Invoice or Deduct TDS and Adjust the invoice using F-54 ?
    Also should we make remittance challan in the system for Sep 11 ?
    Awaiting your reply.
    Regards
    Gautam.

    Hi,
    You will Go to  SE16  give  table name  MARV  enter,  select your company code XXXX, Execute  & select your client XXX and F2 and go to command box enter  /h  press enter twice and go to menu path select debugger and select  switch to classic debugger Double click on  "if code", you will be provide with "if code and show, remove show and give EDIT and press F8 (execute), you will be displayed with delete entry button, and click on delete entry button and save
    and go to OMSY And chose your company code select your required period , year and save
    Thanks,
    Raviteja

  • Payment blocking for MIRO invoice.

    Hi,
        We Need to build Payment release workflow for MIRO invoice.
        If the invoice amount exceeds 10000, that line item need to be blocked and shoudl be sent a mail for approval.
        My doubt is, whether the  payment blocking is done by configuration settings or will workflow take care of that one?
        Requirement is, line item should be blocked automatically while posting the doc in MIRO.
        If it can be done by configuration, could anybody suggest the path to do so.
        Thanks,
        Shyam.

    I would try another SDN forum.

  • No invoice amount value in  2LIS_02_SCL

    I have created a PO, with an IR connected to it. The IR contains an invoiced amount - however it is not extracted in 2LIS_02_SCL in BW nor with the RSA3. The value is 0, Anyone that knows why? Any conditions that has to be met in order for the Invoice to be extracted?
    Best Regards
    /Daniel

    Hi,
    Normally there are no values specified at Schedule line level but there is Qty specified at this level. You can a write a User Ext to populate these values based on the below logic:
    Qty: You can refer to table EKET and the respective field is MENGE (Scheduled Qty of the schedule line)
    Value: There is no direct way to populat this because in case of a PO Line has multiple schedule lines then it's important to calculate value based on the schedule line qty. Refer to PO Line Net Price (EKPO-NETPR) and multiply this with the respective Schedule line qty to derive the value.
    You should enhance the Extract structure with 2 additional fields and then populat them per the above logic.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers
    Bala Koppuravuri

  • INVOICE - AMOUNT DIFF.

    Dear All,
                               User had made a service P.O for which rate for a job is Rs 1500 Per Ton. After Completion of Job Service entry done in ML81N, here the TON qty entered is only 33.5 ton instead of 35 ton. Now MIRO is done by FI User is now doing MIRO ,so here qty in MIRO is 33.5 ton but the amount here is 43,550. But it should be Rs 1500 x 33.5 = Rs 50,250 . It shows that the total amount i.e 43,550 is bieng calculated with the rate of Rs 1300.But in actual the rate in P.O & as well as in Ser. entry sheet is Rs 1500. Kindly guide where to check at present FI Guy had not posted MIRO .
    KM

    Hi,
    Please check was the PO rate changed before service entry?
    Please also check pricing date category GR date or PO date
    plase also check table ESLL for gross amount as per serive
    Please also check is there any limit in PO?
    Please confirm
    BR
    Diwakar

  • MIRO. Amount Split without Taxes Code

    Hi,
    I´m trying to make a "MIRO" "Invoice Verification"  from a Purchase Order witn only one item.
    I want to split the amount in two parts, in order to assign each part a different Tax Code.
    Somehow, I cannot see the Tax Code Field, in the "Amount Split" TAB.
    Does anybody know how can i display this field?
    Does anyboby know a different way to solve this problem?
    Thanks in advanced?

    Hi
    I really appreciate your answer.
    I tried to do what you suggested, but it is impossible in my system. I cannot leave the TAX CODE field in blank in the position. The system gives me an error "m8249" "Enter a tax code".
    I tried to find out where I could erase this message in Customizing, without success.
    Does anybody know, where i can set this field as not a mandatory field for the MIRO?
    Thanks,

  • MIRO Invoice blocked

    Hi Gurus,
    When IR happens before GR, MIRO invoice of Inter-company is getting blocked. But, issue is when the GR happens the block should get removed automatically if there is no Price or Qty variance. Does Auto-router program MRBR process Inter-company vendor invoices? Kindly advice.
    Thanks for the Support.
    JBC

    Where do I uncheck this??
    I take that back. I just found it. Thanks a lot for your help.
    Thanks,
    Swapna
    Edited by: Swapna Konidena on Feb 14, 2008 7:53 PM

Maybe you are looking for