MIRO: Only Default tax code appears on header, no other tax codes displayed

Hi Friends,
In MIRO header, only default tax code appears. No other tax codes even thought they are defined in FTXP for the country appear there. Is there any customizing to be done so that all these tax code also show up there? This is happening only for a few company codes which do not have reporting country assigned to tax codes in FTXP. Is there any specific logic/reason based on reporting country that all other tax codes do not appear in MIRO?
Thanks and regards,
Pinky

Tax codes need to be defined for the country which is same as the country of the relevant company code you are using in MIRO. Also the country needs to be assigned to the tax calculation procedure in OBBG.
Thanks and regards
Kedar

Similar Messages

Us Payoll : Tax Model Changes : Creation Of A New Tax Class : Impact

Hi Experts,
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specification of PC 71 for a wagetype so that it is taxed only for a particular tax authority , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries ( with the new specification ) for other tax authorities as well so that the existing tax calculations happen as it is.
The issue is explained IN DETAIL below :
We have one requirement to include certain wage types X Y Z for the calculation of Transit District Excise Tax /435 in the tax authority ABC
When we checked our system, for these wage types X Y Z the corresponding tax classification is set as 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) which is linked to tax type 1 and not linked to 35 tax type , so we need to assign it to a specification which is having both 1 and 35 tax types. We can assign this to 935 which is linked to both 1 and 35 however this will impact all the wage types that are linked to 0 ( Regular taxable wages ) specification in PC 71.
Our business does not want these other wagetypes to be impacted i.e the requirement is that ONLY X Y Z wagetypes should be included in the calculation of Transit District Exercise Tax /435 for the tax authority ABC.So the option is that we have is to create a new 71 tax class specificaiton say * and assign it to these wagetypes and then create a new entry assining this * in the table T5UTM to 935 for this tax authority so that it is taxed for Transit District Excise Tax /435.
However since we are assigning a new tax class specffication to these wagetypes, there will be a impact on ALL THE OTHER tax authorities where these wagetypes X Y Z are having an old specification of 0 ( Regular taxable wages ). So we have to create newe entries with this new specification * in the table T5UTM so that the current tax calcutions are not impacted.
We have about 500 tax authoties or 500 tax models where we will have to create new entries with the new tax class specirication '" * " , so that these wagetypes are taxed as they are being taxed today, for all of the other tax authorities.
Has anyone earlier created a new tax class specirication of PC 71 , if yes how did you handle the impact on the other tax authorities ,did you create new entries for other tax authorities., which is next to being impossible as we cannot create 500 entries.
Alternatively we are looking at using the TAX MODIFIER for this requirement , please advise if anyone has used TAX MODIFIER for this kind of a requirement mentioned above. Any suggestions are most welcome.
Regards,
Vineeth
Please Dont use Caps letters
Edited by: Moderator

Yes we are also referring to the same and this is the actual issue we have , each tax authority has its own tax model. We have to customize (add) this new tax type in the tax models or it won't be considered ( as you have mentioned ).
But we have over 500 different tax models and we cannot be adding this new specification in each tax model , Please advise how this could be handled other than writing a rule. We are just thinking loud if there is anything that we are missing.
These wagetypes are quiet common in all tax authorities , so have to be added in all the tax models i.e. for all tax authorities.

Tax code not appearing in Header data of MIRO

Dear All,
I have one query and it is as follows.
I created one Input tax code A3 in transaction FTXP.
When I went to transaction MIRO this tax code A3 is not appearing in header data of MIRO.
Can you pls tell is there any other settings to be done to fullfill the above requirment.
Thanks in advance
Babu

Hi
Create a tax code in FTXP
Then assigen tax code to company code
Maintain condition records FV11
Try it out
Regards,
Raman

Change the tax code at order header level that reflect the change in all it

Dear consultant,
Change the tax code at order header level that reflect the change in all items lines under this order
Facts:
Define tax code,
Assign it to bill & ship to customers,
I do all setup in oracle receivable guide for defining tax
Examples: I navigate to order management to create order
First I select the customer and order type after that I navigate to tab line
I enter the item in the first line the tax code coming by default
I enter the second items line also the tax code coming by default etc three ,four, five until line 40
Now I want to change the tax code for all items but not by enter and change it in each line? No,
I want the way that I change Tax Code at order header after that the change is reflect in all items line
Business Impacts:
Suppose I create order include 40 items , I want to change the tax code that coming by default , that require me to enter in each line to change tax cod 40 times ,this not logic and not acceptable from my customer

Hi,
The defaulting rules apply only for the first time when you are adding new lines on to the Sales Order. Respective field vaues will be defaulted from the SO header level.
In case, if you want to update all the 40 lines for Tax Code in one shot, then please select all the lines on the sales order, try Mass Change.
(Navigation: Tools->Mass Change).
Regards,
Hemanth

Error msg Z1019 when using MIRO 'Tax Code V4 cannot be used for Co Code'

When trying to post an Invoice for an EU Vendor using MIRO we are getting an error message 'Tax code V4 cannot be used for Company Code &'. Tax Code V4 is set up via FTXP as an input Tax Code 'Services within the EU' with EU code '5 - Input tax for services - VAT 2010'. Any ideas or thoughts as to why this Tax code is not working as it should be in this scenario?
Many thanks in advance for your help & assistance.

Hi,
it seems there is a validation raising message Z1 019.
Go to transaction OB28 and check the existence of the validation.
Best regards.

Default profit centers Plant wise for Balance Sheet tax relevant Items.

Dear All,
We have an issue in profit center acccounting.
In balance sheet accounts, Vat input tax payable, TDS payable, Cenvat clearing etc are picking profit center from 3KEH. When Exicse is getting captured cenvat clearing account having the profit center but while doing the MIRO cenvat clearing do not have profit center & plant.
Why it is so?
Basically we are doing the following steps.
1. Purchase order creation ME21N.
2.Goods received via migo
3. invoice receipt via miro.
At the time of miro posting, system creates automatically accounting document, with default profit center maintained in 3KEH, which are assigned to Vat input tax payable, TDS payable, other tax accounts. For GR/IR clearing account right profit center is picking without any mistake, while doing MIGO & MIRO.
We need to extract the Balance Sheet profit center wise at plant level.
Derivation rule is created for this balance sheet account along with Valuation area condition to post to correct profit center maintained under Tcode: 3KEI . But system is taking only default profit center (3KEH).
I have checked configuration and the following areas like Material master costing view, tax code areas, and account group but did not find any mistake.
Please advice and Guide us, how to get correct profit center at plant level for these balance sheet accounts instead of default. (I want to make default profit centers plant wise).
It is urgent.
Thanks,
Shailendra Gupta.

Hi!
You can use following report :
S_ALR_87013336 (Report for Balance sheet at Profit Center and Group Level).
Hope this will help.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

Vendor master Head office Concept tax value problem

Hi,
I have created two Vendor master and assigned one vendor as Head office in other,I have tax code for the plant vendor material combinatio for which one vendor 5% VAT is maintained and other vendor I have maintained 2% cst now while creating A MIRO for the PO raised for the vendor of other vendor system is bringing the other party as invoicing party but the tax becomes 5% vat and 2% cst what may be wrong
Regards
vijikantha

Dear friends
I am facing a unique problem. Problem is related to Head Office &
Branch relationship. When i post a document through FB70 (FI manual
Sales Booking) system is updating Head office and post the document
which is correct. We can view the particular transaction though FBL5N
report for Head office customer.
Now if i book sales through Sales Order ie SD Module, System is not
Updating Head office customer in the Accounting Document.We can view
Accounting Document in Branch Customer only using FBL5N report. when we
run FBL5N for Head Office Customer, it is not showing billing document.
We have maintained Head Office field in Branch Customer master data.
We have maitained Branch as SP / BP / PY / SH under partner function
under Sales Area Tab of Branch Customer Master data.
Waiting for your reply
Thanks & Regards
Brijendra H Shakdwipee

Unwanted source code appears in browser but not in Dreamweaver Code Window

I am using templates and css, and Dreamweaver to build a new website of about 20 pages. With the first several pages, everything was working well. Then as I continued to add pages, I started to notice some code appearing at the bottom of web pages (under the footer), and then, a page duplicating the footer, and then, the drop-down function on the index page not working (pulls down and pops right back up) while headers on other pages work fine. I viewed the source code in the browsers (IE and Firefox) and I see the extra code at the bottom. However, this code doesn't show up in Dreamweaver, or, when I open the files in Notepad.
Following is an example of the different bottom-most lines of code in the Firefox browser compared to what I see in Dreamweaver or Notepad (note the highlighted line that is not showing up in Notepad or Dreamweaver).
Firefox Browser:
</div>
      </div>
      <div class="clear"></div>
    </div>
</div>
</div>
<script src="http://brandbar.oit.duke.edu/footer/videos_podcasts_full.php" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://brandbar.oit.duke.edu/header/js/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://brandbar.oit.duke.edu/header/js/globalHeader.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://brandbar.oit.duke.edu/footer/js/footer.js"></script>
</body>
</html>ript>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://brandbar.oit.duke.edu/footer/js/footer.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
Notepad or Dreamweaver code screen:
</div>
      </div>
      <div class="clear"></div>
    </div>
</div>
</div>
<script src="http://brandbar.oit.duke.edu/footer/videos_podcasts_full.php" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://brandbar.oit.duke.edu/header/js/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://brandbar.oit.duke.edu/header/js/globalHeader.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://brandbar.oit.duke.edu/footer/js/footer.js"></script>
</body>
</html>

this answer is a bit late, but i think i have figured this problem out and it is probably still bugging someone out there.
i was having the same issues through many dreamweaver upgrades and kept running into the same problem (only on my Mac though - PC never gave me trouble). anyway, my hard drive recently died and i had a brand new one installed and then i installed a fresh version of CS5. started building a page and ran into the same problem. now that this is happening on a new drive with a fresh OS and reinstalled software, i needed to look elsewhere.
the problem is so simple you will more than likely cry at the amount of time you have wasted on it. more than likely if this is happening to you, you are working off of a network drive or a server. all my files are stored on a server locally, so when i make a change it is saving to the server. either a bad or slow connection to the server and/or a server going bad will cause this issue.
take the same file that you are having problems with and save down to your desktop - then preview in a browser. so the solution is to build the entire site on your local drive and then FTP up to the live site when complete.
hope this helps.

Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code (Message no. FS206)

Hi Guys,
I am facing very critical issue on down Payment request, to process with saperate Tax Value.
We are supporting on Roll-out for Germany. We have implemented all standard SAP processes in the Project. We have also implemented many interfaces and one of the Interface is Sabrix Tax Engine (Tax Jurisdiction Code).
As per the Germany legal requirement, the Tax has to get calculated whenever the funds gets transfered from one Bank Account to Another Bank Account.
Coming to the issue: In the Customer Down Payment scenario, we are creating the Down payment request for Customer and as per Germany local requirement the Tax of 19% has to get calculated on Down payment.
For an Example: We have the Sales Order Contract Value of 100,000.00 EUR and we are creating the Down Payment reqeust of 10% which is 10000 EUR + Tax 19% 1900 EUR.
We are trying to post the Down Payment request in F-37 and we get the issue "Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code". This error is appearing due to Sabrix Tax engine (Tax Jurisdiction Code) has implemented in our System.
We have gone through the SAP notes 97288 and 213567 and understood that the Standard SAP does not support us to post the Down Payment request with Separate Tax Value, when the External Tax Engine has implemented.
I request you to suggest me, if you have already seen this issue in any of your Projects and fixed through the work-around solution. We have been working on work-around since 2 weeks, however no result.
Below is the error message:
Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code
Message no. FS206

HI Preeti,
Thanks for your response. We have already seen the similar SAP notes and the SAP notes explains that the "Down pmnts with taxes cannot be done along with with jur.code". The only solution is to post the DP without Tax.
However there might be some workaround which can be done in SAP, to process the Down Payment/Advance Payments with Tax Value along with Jurisdiction Code. I would like to know this.
Did any one seen this case in your experiece, if yes, what is the work-around solution?.
Need your help guys!,...
Regards,
Damodar Naidu

Change Default Digital Signature Appearance

Looking for assistance on this one because I'm not finding the information anywhere.
Is there a way to change the default Appearance option from "Standard Text" to another custom created Appearance. Or even remove the "Standard Text" option altogether leaving only the custom created Appearance option available?
We have Users who continue to utilize the "Standard Text" option for signing documents instead of the custom one available as the next option down in the drop-down box.
Thanks,
BSwayngim

Hi,
There is no method of setting the default. The registry keeps track of the last appearance used, but it's by index position and if someone added (or removed) a custom appearance it would negate what you are trying to do.
However, if everyone is going to have the same custom signature appearance available to them at signing time you could use Seed Value to enforce the rule that they select a specific appearance. To read up on how to use JavaScript to set a Seed Value go to http://livedocs.adobe.com/acrobat_sdk/9/Acrobat9_HTMLHelp/wwhelp/wwhimpl/js/html/wwhelp.ht m?href=JS_API_AcroJS.88.1.html#1515776&accessible=true and then click the Search button. Search for Seed Value and then select signatureSetSeedValue from the list of returned items.
The JavaScript code would look like
var f= this.getField("Signature1");
f.signatureSetSeedValue({
appearanceFilter: "My Custom App",
flags:0x100
where the name of the signature field noted in the first line and the name of the appearanceFilter would depend on your naming convention.
I hope this helps,
Steve

Tax Conditions for Sales and Distribution using Jurisdiction Code in Canada

Hello everyone,
I would like to share with you a doubt relating taxes for Sales and Distribution in Canada.
The Tax conditions for Sales and Distribution in Canada are the CTX1 (GST - Canada), CTX2 (PST - Canada) and CTX3 (Base + GST). These are the Tax Conditions which appear when creating a Material or a Client for the Canada Region, and are also the ones included in the Canada Standandard Pricing Procedure.
I tried to apply the standard method of creating a Master Record for these conditions, but an error relating the Jurisdiction Code came out while releasing to accounting.
Does anyone one how to procceed? Which are the important issues with Finance Accounting to take in to account?
I would really appreciate any comment relating this issue.
Thank you very much in advanced.
Víctor

Dear Mr. Lakshmipathi,
In first place, thank you very much for your quick response.
I have tried many different procedures to get the aim, and among others, a new access sequence was created to allow the introduction of the Jurisdiction Code (UTXJ is not available for Sales Conditions) but once the Condition is created, it is not recognized when creating the Order ("pricing error: Mandatory condition CTX is missing"). Maybe it has something to do with the fact that these conditions are not included in the Finance Accounting Tax Procedure, where the conditions, which represent the same taxes but with different condition names, are defined for a certain Tax Code and Jurisdiction code.
Among the different SAP notes for the error relating the Jurisdiction code, there was one proposing to change the Condition Category from "D" (Taxes) to a value between "1 and 4". By doing this a new error appears while creating the order, saying that there are conditions in the Tax procedure (JRC1, JRC2)which are not included in the Sales Pricing procedure. By including this conditions in the Pricing procedure, the Tax Conditions existing in the Finance Accounting Tax Procedure are brought to the Order Conditions, in addition to the Sales Tax Conditions. And there is something more, each Tax Condition from the Finance Accounting Procedure appears twice, one with the application V (Sales) with value zero, and one with application TX (Taxes) with the value existing in the Finance Accounting Taxes Procedure. This is how at the end, the corresponding %value of the taxes is brought to the Invoice with the correct Tax Code, and the proper Jurisdiction Code, which is different for each condition.
Thank you very much for your time.
Víctor Liedo

Tax code maintained as ZERO, then also tax has been charged in billing docu

Tax code maintained as ZERO, then also tax has been charged in billing document. Please help to find some solution
Point will be rewared accordinly..
DAVID

In access sequence, if you check for your tax condition type, see what table is maintained. Normally, for domestic scenario, table 368 would be used.
So go to VF02, key in the billing document and execute. There go to "Header" tab and check what tax classification for customer is flowing under the sub tab "Taxes".
Next go to item level tab "Item Detail" and see what tax classification is flowing for that material.
Now in VK12, for your tax condition type, you should have assigned tax code for the above combination. From your comments, it seems, you have maintained for wrong combination.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Change the Tax Code- In Sales Order i have Tax code for VAT

In Sales Order i have Tax code for VAT ( Condition type JIVP) it is reflecting "P4" instead of "A4".
Where the "P4" Tax code is picking in Sales Order.
How to change the Tax Code.
Urgent

Hi CHAKRI,
Check if the condition record is maintained with the appropriate taxclasssification.If yes, Go to sales order in change mode,then goto-header-billing-alternate taxcalssification and modify tax classification.It will pick up right tax code.
Regards
Ram Pedarla

Acquisition tax in Belgium/Germany-Posting with different tax codes

Dear Friends,
Does anyone have experience working with Acquisition tax in Belgium and German where the goods and services purchased within EU have 21% -input and output tax such that it is ZERO. But still Tax authorities need to see both input and output tax amount with different tax code such as under:
Expense a/c Dr 100
Payable a/c Cr 100
Input VAT a/c Dr 21 - Tax code A1
Output VAT a/c Cr 21 - Tax code B1
Any help as to how to post the above entry and how to customize tax code to get the above result and any changes if required in country code tax calculation procedure will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Pinky

Hi Pinky,
When you define your tax codes, the system defaults certain tax types that have been defined in the system for specific countries. Input tax, output tax, and non-deductible input tax are examples of tax types used in Germany.
The system determines which tax types are to be displayed by means of the country key. A calculation procedure is specified for each country key, and this procedure contains the country-specific specifications for calculating and posting the different tax types.
When you define the calculation procedure, you must answer the following questions concerning each tax type:
What is the base amount for calculating the tax? This can be the expense or revenue amount or, as with sales equalization tax in Belgium, a tax amount.
Which calculation type is used to determine the base amount: percentage included or percentage separate? With very few exceptions (such as for travel expense accounting in Germany), the base amount is normally determined percentage included.
The tax amount is 15%.
Percentage included
Tax amount = invoice gross amount * (tax rate/100 + tax rate)
150 = 1150 * ( 15 / 100 + 15)
Percentage separate
Tax amount = invoice net gross * tax rate/100
150 = 1000 * 15 / 100
To which side of the account must the tax amount be posted? The input and output tax is always posted in accordance with the G/L account and asset line items. For the tax to be posted additionally, the side of the account is determined depending on the input or output tax. For the acquisition and investment tax, for example, you post to the opposite side of the account.
Should a possible tax expense be divided between the G/L account and asset line items or posted separately? If, for example, you have a non-deductible input tax amount, you can choose whether to post to a separate expense account or apportion the tax expense between the G/L account and asset line items.
The type of tax calculation and posting depends on the answers to these questions and the combination of those answers.
The following topics introduce individual tax types and explain the necessary specifications for calculating and posting tax. For more information on the calculation procedure, see The Calculation Procedure.
See also:
Tax on Sales/Purchases: Input and Output Tax
Non-Deductible Input Tax
Deferred Tax: Italy
Sales Tax
Use Tax
Tax Calculation With or Without Jurisdiction Code?
Entering Taxes with Jurisdiction Code
Acquisition Tax
Investment Tax
Sales Equalization Tax
I hope this link will help you
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/e5/077e394acd11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards
Odaiah

I downloaded a digital copy of a movie and when I went to play the iTunes special features lines of code appeared instead? Can I get a new download of the iTunes special features?

I downloaded a digital copy of the film Hanna and the digital copy was supposed to come with itunes extras (special features) but when I click on it a bunch of code appears as follows in stead of the special features:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<meta name="hdtv-fullscreen" content="true" />
<meta name="hdtv-cursor-off" content="true" />
<title>Hanna</title>

    <script type="text/javascript" src="TuneKit/src/TuneKit.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/shared.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/home.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/chapters.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/features.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/gallery.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/more.css" type="text/css" media="screen" />

<script type="text/javascript" src="controllers/data.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="controllers/home.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="controllers/chapters.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="controllers/features.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="controllers/gallery.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="controllers/more.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="bleed">
<div id="navigation">
<div id="vid" class="vid_bg">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Can I get a new download for the special features?

andrewfromcarmel,
I experienced a similar issue with 10.6.8 and iTunes 11.
Several questions:
1. What version of iTunes are you using?
2. Is your iTunes library located on a network drive or a local drive?
3. What error are you getting during the download?
4. Do you have the ability to try and download the extras file on a different computer?
Regards,

MIRO: Only Default tax code appears on header, no other tax codes displayed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for