MIRO related
Hi Experts
WHile doing MIRO the baseline date field becomes blank after the date has been input and is asking for the date to be input and again it vanishes. Kindly help.
Regards
Hi,
I'm facing the same issue here. The payment terms is maintained in PO. But still the baseline date in MIRO always blank.
Any solutions ?
Thanks,
Melissa
Similar Messages
-
To display MIRO related fields
Hi to all
I have to develope a report consisting of following fields.
This report is for Micro, Small & Medium enterprises report.
PO No.
GRN No.
GRN Date
GRN Value
Vendor Code
Vendor Name
MIRO-MM Doc
MIRO-FI Doc No.
Amount
Payment Doc No.
Posting date
Chq No.
Chq Date
Now I am not getting the linking of MIRO-MM doc no to fetch MIRO related details of a PO.
Please guide me.
If possible send me code.HI,
Use Table
EKBE - PO HIstory
RKPF - Invoice header
RSEG - Invoice Item.
BKPF - accounting docu, header
BSEG - accounting docu. item
reward if useful,
Regards,
Chetan. -
Hi freinds
I have a typical requirement. When I post an Invoice in MIRO and if the price is more than the PO price a warning message is generated. I want this message to go to specific users via SAP mail box. Can it be done.
Regards
EldeeHi
I have done the reqd. setting in config also. Still it is not working. Can you detail the config so that I can check for anything missing.
Regards
Eldee -
Hi Experts
I have a requirement. WHile doing customs MIRO the customs duties appear as per the alphabateic sequence of the condition type codes. I want them as per the pricing procedure. How do i go about it?
RegardsVikas,
I have checked all account determination.
But I thk at the time of MIGO system is asking for Commercial Invoice
Then which commercial invoive should be given,
Pls guide me.
If wrong comm Invoice is given, how it will affect the transaction.
Pls guide me.
Regards
Gitesh -
In which table invoices related to a purchase order are stored ?
Hi all,
We need to make an ABAP program and I need to know in which table the invoices made by MIRO related to a purchase order are stored.
I can see them in the purchase order history tab in the transaccion ME23N but giving F1 and getting the table names gives me a structure table but not the actual table in SAP database. I tried the BSEG table but it doesn't store the purchase order number. Any information will be highly appreciated.
Thanks !!Hi
You can get the Link of PUrchase order & the Invoice from Table EKBE.
You can also get the data by joining the table RBKP & RSEG, as the Purcahse order details are stored in RSEG & posting date details are stored in RBKP
Thanks & Regards
Kishore -
MIRO R payment block without price difference
Dear gurus,
I'm stuck in the middle of a problem: please help me solving it.
I've done a MIRO related to a good receipt: payment lock has been set to "R" value in FI document. Invoice value is the same of good receipt value: no price difference at all.
What I immediatly check is this:
1) MRBR shows "X" in Blocking Reason Price column with a yellow background of the cell
2) MRBR difference column is 0
3) OMR6 tolerance for this CoCode are set only for PP and BD (but PP and BD are not appliable in this case because invoice exactly match good receipt)
Please guide me finding reason why invoice has been locked. That's not an isolated case, other examples happened in production environment.
How can I go on analyzing the issue? How can I find the reason why some invoices are blocked?
Thanks a lot!
AndreaHi
Another reason I could think of was due to tolerance limit AP being set up which checks the invoice amount at item level against the PO item level amount. If there is a mismatch at item level as well, Block Reason R is set up.
You may want to check the tolerance group set up for your company codes as per the document below:
http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/logistics-mm/blog/2014/04/18/invoice-tolerance-limits--an-insight--part-1
Thanks & Regards
Sanil Bhandari -
MIRO Retention Accounting Entries
Hi Gurus ,
We have a Scenario where we mentioned a Retention Amount at Header . System automatically distribute the Percentage Amount at Item levels.When we post a MIRO related to that PO , system post an accouting entries to vendor reconcillation account .(Spl indicator H).If there are two item in invoice then system deduct retention on both items and show two separate Accounting entries related to each item.
Our requirement is that system should post a single entry related to total Invoice amount rather than generating separate entry for each line item in MIRO.
Reason for this is that we have around 100 line items in an invoice & at the time of retention payment it would become tedious to select 100 line items for payments. alternatively if only single entry gets generated in place of 100 line items then it would become easy to manage.
Pls guide how to tackle such scenario.
Thanks in advance !!
HoneyIt appears you are using Installment payment term ( Created at OBB9) and system posts line items equal to number of instalments. Payment terms are assigned to Vendor Master so check which payment term is used.. Go to OBB8 and check any instalment paymenter term check box is selected. is selected go to OBB9 and check how many instalments?
Instead of intalment payment term, use normal payment term ( Created at OBB8) then system will post only one line item. -
Fund center field blank when trying to post an invoice related to an old PO
Hi everyone,
I have implemented PSM - BCS on a company that was already using SAP and now I have encountered the following issue:
I`m trying to post an invoice (using transaction MIRO) related to an old PO that already had the goods receipt posted before BCS was implemented and I'm getting the following error message:
Value BLANK / SPACE is invalid for account assignment element "fund"
I am not getting this error with all the other POs (only the ones with the goods receipt already posted before activating the integration with other modules in BCS)
One of the steps I tried to solve this error was to execute the "Supplementary Account Assignment" for this PO but I am always getting the message: Document was reassigned in the meantime. I don't know what this error means but the PO is not updated with the correct derivation strategy. The same happened with all the POs, I have tried to convert.
I have also checked my derivation rules but they all seem to be correct.
Can anyone help me to understand what's going on?
Thanks in advance,
Maria JoséHi, I had the same issue for that case while 'change' Former to BCS.
For all PO (for which should be posted GR,IR) i change account assignment in PO, and only after that post GR,IR. -
In one company code we are getting one MIRO related problem :
Against Purchase order we prepared GR and sent the matearial to QUALITY then they rejected one kind of matearial and sent back it to vendor then VENDOR sent fresh matearial for which we prepared GR once again for the same . In MIRO instead of taking latest GR Number it is taking a old GR Number against which return delivery we did .Hi,
In your case you have to create Subsequent Debit/Credit instead of creating new GR for the fresh Material.
For example;
GR -> IR works this way.
If the GR is created and Cancelled then if you create new GR then only MIRO will pick the latest GR number.
Regards,
Mohan. -
Hello SAP Guru
Need your help in MIRO related issue.
Scenario is, we are doing invoice verification for an invoice which is of higher amount i.e. vendor has asked for more amount by mistake. We dont reduce the invoice, rather we pass the complete amount by putting the total amount of vendor invoice in amount field. System generates credit memo (vendor debit) for the extra amount. This extra amount is shown in balance field with green light.
Let me tell you what exactly user is doing:
If they receive any invoice with higher amount, they do the usual invoice verification and select invoice as transaction ID and give reference to PO. System suggests the amount as per PO & GR. They simply put the vendor invoice amount in amount field in header and system shows excess amount in balance filed with green light and allow us to post. System credits the vendor with the invoice amount and debits with the excess amount. They dont select invoice reduction as layout nor they give correction ID in MIRO, also they dont make any change in the field (amount / qty as per vendor invoice).
When I am doing the same process for few invoices, system is not allowing me.
vendor specific tolerance group has been defined as given below:
for negative diff :
absolute lower limit
Absolute negative lower acceptance limit 200.00-
% lower limit 4.00%
negative small diff 10.00-
for positive diff :
small diff 5.00
absolute upper limit 50.00
Percentage positive upper acceptance limit 2.00%
for invoice reduction :
Autom. invoice reduction: absolute upper limit 1000000.00
Even for some of invoices, we are not able to post the excess amount.
Please suggest.
Thanks & regards
Manoj GuptaHi Ishu
Tnx for your reply. Giving below are the error messages:
1) in one case the error message are
The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base
Message no. FF747
Balance in transaction currency
Message no. F5702
2) in second case the error messages are
Balance in transaction currency
Message no. F5702
Balance not zero: 496.25- debits: 387,468.25 ; credits: 386,972.00
Message no. M8534
Thanks & regards'
Manoj Gupta -
Taxes in pricing procedure are not picked up in the simulation for invoice
Hello all
we want to post taxes in pricing procedure in purchase order. but in MIRO Enter Incoming Invoice the system is not picking the taxes as line items in simulation. please let me know any setting missed in this regard.
Thanks in advance
RamarajuHi,
Did you selected the Tax code in MIRO, unless you select how the system will show in the simulation.
Check whether you have assigned the Tax procedure to your Country, did you created the Tax code for your country which you defined. If all the settings are ok then only you will get the Taxes in Simulation of MIRO.
One more thing r u getting any error while doing MIRO related to Taxes. Check & Confirm.
rgds
Chidanand -
Hi,
I have made one import PO.
After doing all MIRO related to customs,octroi,insurance etc I have done MIGO for import material which
entries are as follows :
Stock Account 216310 750000.00 +
Purchase Offset Account 700000 750000.00 -
Instead of GR/IR clearing a/c entries are going to purchase Offset account.
Please guide me why this is happening?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
GiteshHi,
See the brief details abt purchase accounting:
In case of the conventional way of accounting for materials, system debits inventory account and credits GR/IR account.
At the time of MIRO, if price differences occur, the price difference is taken to inventory account. This is so for price control indicator V. However, even in this case, if adequate stock coverage is not there, then the price difference is posted to expense account and not taken to inventory account.
Hence, it becomes difficult to arrive at the actual purchase value. To over come this SAP has purchase accounting concept. If this is activated, following additional entries will be posted apart from the normal entries.
1. At the time of MIGO u2013 Debit Purchase account and credit Purchase Offset account.
2. At the time of MIRO- Dr or Cr. Purchase account and Cr. Or Dr. Purchase offset account
Regards,
Rajeswari -
Hi,
I have made one import PO.
After doing all MIRO related to customs,octroi,insurance etc I have done MIGO for import material which
entries are as follows :
Stock Account 216310 750000.00 +
Purchase Offset Account 700000 750000.00 -
Instead of GR/IR clearing a/c entries are going to purchase Offset account.
Please guide me why this is happening?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
GiteshVikas,
I have checked all account determination.
But I thk at the time of MIGO system is asking for Commercial Invoice
Then which commercial invoive should be given,
Pls guide me.
If wrong comm Invoice is given, how it will affect the transaction.
Pls guide me.
Regards
Gitesh -
Wrongly picking price variance account
Hi Experts,
I am trying to post the Invoice through MIRO related to stock. there is a bit price difference. Hence it is going to Price variance account. But the Account maintained for the valuation class of that material in OMWB is different from that being picked up while simulating invoice(MIRO). How is this possible. Is there any other setting from where it is picking up other account.Hi,
Thanks for your reply, but OBYC and OMWB are the same. from omwb we go to t.code obyc and many others. I have checked the account maintained in PRD.
What else can be the possibility. -
Hi Experts,
How can i capture multiple vendors for a particular purchase order in transaction MIRO through BADI Invoice_update.There can be a situatin where a particular purchase order can be linked to multiple vendors ( due to change in address), if the scenario exits i want to throw a pop up message that multiple vendors exit for this purchase order and when the user goes to post this MIRO,and the related vendors should be available under F4 help in invoice party ,how can i do this with this BADI.
Regards
Prasunthis is answered
Maybe you are looking for
-
i have had no internet since sunday and have been experiencing horrendous customer service from bt. The problem seems to be that its a call centre and noone is willing to take responsibility for the problem. All I get told is that someone will call m
-
SolMan 4.0 SR2 Step 30 Password Not Allowed Error Changing DDIC Pwd
I'm on Step 30 of my SOLMAN install. SAPInst is trying to change the DDIC.000 password and gets the error, "PASSWORD_NOT_ALLOWED". DDIC can connect to the RFC just fine. I went in through the client and changed DDIC and SAP* passwords back to the
-
I uninstalled Firefox and re-installed it, but that didn't work. My Yahoo homepage looks like a puzzle. Images not loading correctly. Works fine on Safari, so I figure it is something in my Firefox settings.
-
I trying to create a strip chart for 16 channels that will require displaying 10-20 minutes of data.It also starts a separate vi to set gains and offsets while displaying the data. Using AI Read.vi uses 100% of the CPU so the second vi does not run.
-
..................