Mismatch between FS10N & FBL3N - PRD issue

Hi Consultants,
We have a problem with regard to mismatch between FS10N & FBL3N with regards to Retained Earnings account.
The retained earnings account was blocked for posting from 02/28/2013.
However, the account had transaction from 04/01/2014 onwards and there were postings from another retained earnings account which was not blocked.
Hence, in FS10N we are able to see the account, where as in FBL3N we are unable to view the account.There was posting in the special posting period.
Please give us your valuable suggestions.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Sumati,
I'm sorry I couldn't understand what you said in your previous post.
Can you please provide some more details when you say
"AND 1MORE REASON IS THERE I.E IF ANY TAX RETAES ARE CHANGES AFTER POSTING DOCUMNTS U NEED TO CHECK THESE TAX RATES AND CHECK PREVIOUS DOCUMNTS TO CHNGING DOCUMENTS" ?
Which transaction/ table I need to check for tax rate changes ? Could you explain this in detail ?
Regards,
Shail.

Similar Messages

  • Retained earnings account- differences between F.01, FS10N, FBL3N

    Hi Sap Gurus
                           Maybe someone can help me. When Iu2019m trying to control the amounts for the retained earnings account comparing the FS10N, FS10N drilldown, FBL3N, and F.01 they give me all different values.
    I understand that the differences between the FS10N and FBL3N can be related to the carryfowrd process.
    But, okey. Why when Iu2019m double click on the FS10N report the system shows a different value from the FBL3N? Another problem is when I compare the amount from FS10N and F.01 for the same retained earnings account, the system show complete different values, how I can verify the amounts for control and audit process?
    Regards
    Gabriela

    I cannot speak on F.01 but between FS10N and FBL3N and FS10N drill down, they should equal in grand total. Keep in mind that FS10N GL Account balance display is based on one fiscal year display but the cumulative balance should be all activity from day 1 that has been carried forward.
    Try running FS10N for the last fiscal year possible. If carryforward for the retained earnings accounts have been performed for each year, then the ending figure in the cumulative balance column will equal the same total ending balance you get when you execute FBL3N GL Line item display for the same retained earnings account (providing you select "All items" and don't include in posting date restrictions or any others on the selection screen).
    Using FS10N for each fiscal year, you can check to to see if the beginning cumulative balance is the same as the previous years ending cumulative balance. If not then they may be a carryforward issue.

  • Difference in the Balance between FS10N and Customer Balances in Local Curr

    Hi,
    When i am trying to match the Balances between FS10N and Customer Balances in Local Currency for the Period 8, we are getting the difference, The reconcilliaton Account was changed on 30.08.2010.
    Please help Us in tracing the differences between FS10N and Customer Balances in Local Currency.
    What could be the possible reasons for the differences..
    Thanks

    Hi Varshani,
    Please use the program/report SAPF070 to compare or reconcile your AR with GL balances. You can use SAPF071 to correct any inconsistencies. Provided below documentation for these programs.
    SAPF070  - Compare Documents and Account Transaction Figures
    Description
    This program compares debit and credit transaction figures in customer, vendor, and G/L accounts with the debit and credit totals from documents posted in the corresponding posting period (accounting reconciliation). The sales totals are also compared for customer and vendor accounts. There is no separate comparison for special G/L transactions.
    A comparison for G/L accounts can be made in company code currency and in parallel currencies (such as group currency). A comparison for customer and vendor accounts can only be made in company code currency.
    After the program has finished, a message is issued to the user that started the program. This message summarizes the results of the reconciliation.
    Output
    The program compares the totals of an account on a periodic basis. If the debit and credit total differs between account and documents, the account is printed with the debit and credit totals and the difference.
    Differences in G/L accounts are shown per transaction currency. The first line shows the amount in local currency, the second line shows the amounts in transaction currency.
    If a document which falls within the selection range is posted during the program run, the program is terminated since a reliable result can no longer be delivered.
    SAPF071 - Adjust Balances after Comparing Documents/Transaction Figures
    Description
    If a financial accounting comparative analysis (SAPF190) or a comparison of documents and transaction figures (SAPF070) shows that there are differences between documents and transaction figures, you can use this program to make an adjustment. The documents form the basis for this adjustment. The program adjusts the (redundant) transaction figures, which are only totals of amounts from documents.
    Requirements
    All of the following listed requirements must be fulfilled:
    1. A financial accounting comparative analysis (SAPF190) or a comparison of documents and transaction figures (SAPF070) must be made, and differences must be found between documents and transaction figures.
    2. There must not be any inconsistent documents found. These are listed in both SAPF070 and SAPF190 as well as in this program.
    3. There cannot be any problems in the other modules. Caution: You have to check this yourself. Financial Accounting may be correct but the other modules may not be, and this will adversely affect the program run.
    4. You can only make the adjustment in the ledgers which are compared by program SAPF070. This is ledger 00 or a user-defined ledger for all parallel local currencies except the group currency. (The program displays these ledgers). You have to adjust any additional ledgers as well as average balance ledgers yourself.
    5. No documents during the period in which you are adjusting transaction figures can be archived. Caution: You must ensure that these documents are not archived by establishing appropriate organizational rules and procedures.
    Only use this program after consulting with SAP or after checking the prerequisites thoroughly.
    You should adjust all differences together for a single company code. By setting the program parameters you can limit the adjustment to G/L currency types or to balances in subledgers.
    It is advisable to execute a test run first, which will list any differences that are found.
    Further notes - Authorizations
    Repair program authorization group (F_005)
    Company code authorization         (F_BKPF_BUK)
    Thanks
    Venkata Ganesh Perumalla
    Edited by: Venkata Ganesh Perumalla on Sep 28, 2010 1:30 PM

  • Fatal error C1900: Il mismatch between 'P1' version '20080116' and 'P2' version '20070207'

    Hi all,
    I have a Team Foundation Build Agent that has Visual Studio Team System 2008 Test Edition installed. One of the solutions that I compile with that Build Agent gives me the following errors:
      VCBUILD : fatal error C1047: The object or library file '.\bin\Release\main.obj' was created with an older compiler than other objects; rebuild old objects and libraries
      LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed
      VCBUILD : fatal error C1900: Il mismatch between 'P1' version '20080116' and 'P2' version '20070207'
      LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed
    I've searched online and found that other people have experienced the same problem:
    http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-c-compiler/topic/62516/
    http://nuicode.com/issues/266
    In the second posting one states "I had the same Error! After installing Service Pack1 for VS2008 it worked!". Thats great for him but I don't see any such update for the Test Edition of Visual Studio Team System 2008 - Test Edition.
    What can I do to get rid of that problem?
    Thanks!

    Hello ACKH
    I once handled a similar case in newsgroups. That case exhibit a almost same symptom. Please check out my summary below:
    Problem
    In that case, the customer has a DLL project that you had built on a machine where VS 2008 SP1 was installed. You then attempted to rebuild that project on a machine without SP1, and got a fatal compiler error C1900 “IL mismatch between ‘P1’ version ‘20080116’ and ‘P2’ version ‘20070207’”, and then LNK1257 “Code generation failed”. He found that rebuilding your static library alleviated the errors, but cannot accept this as a workaround because your clients will not have the ability to rebuild the libraries you distribute before they use them.
    Cause
    You had built the static library with the /GL (Whole Program Optimization) compiler switch, which requires Link Time Code Generation (/LTCG) when the static library is subsequently linked. These features require that all linked modules be built by the same version of the compiler. In fact, if precompiled headers are used, the same machine must build and link all the involved object code. Therefore, it is highly recommended that static libraries not be built with the /GL switch, since their intended use is quite frequently to support reuse by others.
    Solution
    You rebuilt the static library on your VS2008 SP1 machine without the /GL switch, and you no longer encounter this problem.
    Please let me know if this info is helpful to you or not.
    Regards,
    Jialiang Ge
    MSDN Subscriber Support in Forum
    If you have any feedback of our support, please contact [email protected]
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    Welcome to the All-In-One Code Framework! If you have any feedback, please tell us.

  • Output mismatch between BEx query output and WebI Report output

    Hi All,
    I have a BEx query in which there are only characteristics placed in rows.
    There are combinations of the values of the characteristics giving different records in the query output.
    Date is one of the characterisctics in the query output.
    There is an output mismatch between the query output and the WebI report output in the following case:
    When there are 'Not Assigned' or '#' or blank values, there are additional entries(rows) in the WebI report, giving repeating or wrong entries in the Date field. This is incorrect data.
    Is this because of the  'Not Assigned' or '#' or blank values of the Characteristics or is there any other reason?
    How do I fix this?
    Please helo me with this.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Srilakshmi B

    Hi Rajesh,
    I need to verify the WebI report output for records with # and 'Not assigned' values for the cHracteristics in the report.
    So I cannot check the WebI report by hiding the # or Not assigned values.
    The problem is that in the Query output the records are like these shown below:
    Char1                    CHar2                          CHar3                       Date field
    A                             B                                 C                                Date1
    #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)             No value
    Where as the WebI report output is as below:
    Char1                    CHar2                          CHar3                       Date field
    A                             B                                 C                                Date1
    #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)            Date1
    As shown here, there are wrong/repeating entries for the Date field in the WebI report output.
    Please check this and let me know what could be the issue and how do I fix it.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Srilakshmi B

  • IDoc structure mismatch between SAP R/3 and PI

    Hi,
    There is an interface in PI which receives IDoc from SAP R/3 system. I have been facing an issue of IDoc structure mismatch (in terms of data present in it) between SAP R/3 and when PI receives the IDoc.
    To be more precise,
    In SAP R/3 system, the value ABC is present in the field DOCNUM in the IDoc.
    But when the PI receives the same IDoc from SAP R/3 (as seen in Integration Engine), the value ABC is present in a different field and the DOCNUM field is empty.
    <DOCNUM></DOCNUM>
    <ARCKEY>ABC</ARCKEY>
    The first step towards resolution was to delete and reimport the IDoc metadata from SAP R/3 in PI system using IDX2, which did not help in this case.
    Could anyone please help in resolving the field mismatch between the IDoc triggered from SAP R/3 and the IDoc received by PI.
    Regards,
    Prajeet

    Hi Prajeet,
    it's long ago but your question has not been finally solved, so let me try to give you an answer. We are facing the same problem after patching our PI.
    I think the reason for the different behaviour is related to SAP note 1233908, where SAP has changed the IDoc adapter.
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1233908
    Regards,
    Lars

  • Mismatch between the patch version

    Version 2.18, next step, next issue. Got through the 'Do Setup' step on "9-Apply DBA CUP and related patches" with a bug workaround that was provided. Now went to the next step of 'Do Execute' and it is failing with the message below. I've done some inital searching and haven't found an answer. There was one note on MOS about a very similar issue but it was resolved in 2.16. Posting here whild I spend more time researching and trying to figure out the reason. I also reviewed my notes from when I did this upgrade manually and these mereged patches were not applied in preinstall mode as the message is saying has to be done. Any help would be appreicated. Thanks!.
    patchit12.sh - is exiting with no actions. ie. Patch patchfile_ad17089s not applied.
    There is a mismatch between the patch version specified and the release
    version obtained from your Applications environment. In order to apply
    Release 12 patches to previous Applications versions, the patch must be
    applied in preinstall mode.This can be done by passing the appropriate
    value to the preinstall parameter of eof_patch12.sh.
    INFO: Not starting patch alert monitor, to start: Login Engineer, User Admin, Update Profile
    Version in scripts/COMMON
    # $Header: patchit12.sh 1.32 2009/09/15 16:00:00 vpickard $
    Edited by: user649511 on Mar 2, 2011 2:24 PM

    You can change following in patchit12.sh under ./eof/scripts/COMMON. Please change it back before executing any other steps.
    From
    Check_Release()
    #Check if the releasenr is OK
    if [ "${preinstall}" = "y" ];then
    RELEASE=12
    echo
    echo "patchit12.sh is installing: $patch in preinstall=y mode."
    else
    REL=`Get_Release`
    RELEASE=`echo $REL | awk '{print substr($1,1,2)}'`
    echo
    echo "Found release REL=$REL from fnd_product_groups."
    fi
    to
    Check_Release()
    #Check if the releasenr is OK
    if [ "${preinstall}" = "y" ];then
    RELEASE=12
    echo
    echo "patchit12.sh is installing: $patch in preinstall=y mode."
    else
    REL=`Get_Release`
    #RELEASE=`echo $REL | awk '{print substr($1,1,2)}'`
    RELEASE=12
    echo
    echo "Found release REL=$REL from fnd_product_groups."
    fi

  • SSIS 2008 package conversion to SSIS 2012 using SQL Data Tools generating warning There was a mismatch between the processor architecture of the project being built "MSIL" and the processor architecture of the reference "Microsoft.SqlServer.DTSRuntimeWra

    I am seeing the following warning is a SSIS C# script and receive a SSIS abort when I attempt to run the package.
    The SSIS log indicates the package is failing at about this same step in the process.  
    I have also included the file SSQLDUMPER_ERRORLOG.log that SSIS generates when it aborts below.
    My SSIS package has been set to 64-bit and I only have 64-bit SQL Server 2012 installed on the box.
    I migrated the package using the latest version of Data Tools that came out around mid July 2014.
    I edited all connection manager strings to point to 64-bit SQL Server and I run using the following command
    I edited the run string to point to the new 64 bit DTExec and attempted to run.
    C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\DTS\Binn\DTExec.exe" /Rep V /F PkgMigration.dtsx .........................
    A significant amount of work does occur as reflected by the log steps prior to DTEXEC aborting but the log does just quit in mid sentence so not sure if it might have actually got a bit further.
    Any help on understanding what is happening here would be most appreciated.
    Warning               1              There was a mismatch between the processor
    architecture of the project being built "MSIL" and the processor architecture of the reference "Microsoft.SqlServer.DTSRuntimeWrap, Version=11.0.0.0, Culture=Neutral, PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91", "x86". This mismatch may
    cause runtime failures. Please consider changing the targeted processor architecture of your project through the Configuration Manager so as to align the processor architectures between your project and references, or take a dependency on references with a
    processor architecture that matches the targeted processor architecture of your project.                C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Microsoft.Common.targets             
    1605       5                sc_5756696d96034309a51afe69fed2eb44
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Input parameters: 4 supplied
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 1: 6100
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 2: 0
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 3: 0:0
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 4: 00A8B770
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Parsed parameters:
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ProcessID = 6100
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ThreadId = 0
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Flags = 0x0
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     MiniDumpFlags = 0x0
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     SqlInfoPtr = 0x00A8B770
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     DumpDir = <NULL>
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExceptionRecordPtr = 0x00000000
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ContextPtr = 0x00000000
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExtraFile = <NULL>
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     InstanceName = <NULL>
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ServiceName = <NULL>
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 11 not used
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 15 not used
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 7 not used
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, MiniDump completed: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\ErrorDumps\SQLDmpr0007.mdmp
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'dbghelp.dll' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll'
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'sqldumper.exe' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE'
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '2011.110:5058.0'
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '11.0:5058.0'
    (1CBC:1808) 08/14/14 10:36:47, ACTION,                DTExec.exe, Watson Invoke: No
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Input parameters: 4 supplied
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,      Parameter 1: 10124
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,      Parameter 2: 0
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,      Parameter 3: 0:0
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,      Parameter 4: 0012B770
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Parsed parameters:
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ProcessID = 10124
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ThreadId = 0
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Flags = 0x0
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     MiniDumpFlags = 0x0
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     SqlInfoPtr = 0x0012B770
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     DumpDir = <NULL>
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExceptionRecordPtr = 0x00000000
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ContextPtr = 0x00000000
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExtraFile = <NULL>
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     InstanceName = <NULL>
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ServiceName = <NULL>
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 11 not used
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 15 not used
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 7 not used
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, MiniDump completed: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\ErrorDumps\SQLDmpr0008.mdmp
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'dbghelp.dll' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll'
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'sqldumper.exe' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE'
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '2011.110:5058.0'
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '11.0:5058.0'
    (2724:2488) 08/14/14 10:43:09, ACTION,                DTExec.exe, Watson Invoke: No
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Input parameters: 4 supplied
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,        Parameter 1: 8716
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,        Parameter 2: 0
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,        Parameter 3: 0:0
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,        Parameter 4: 0072B770
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Parsed parameters:
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ProcessID = 8716
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ThreadId = 0
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Flags = 0x0
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     MiniDumpFlags = 0x0
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     SqlInfoPtr = 0x0072B770
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     DumpDir = <NULL>
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExceptionRecordPtr = 0x00000000
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ContextPtr = 0x00000000
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExtraFile = <NULL>
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     InstanceName = <NULL>
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ServiceName = <NULL>
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 11 not used
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 15 not used
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 7 not used
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, MiniDump completed: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\ErrorDumps\SQLDmpr0009.mdmp
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'dbghelp.dll' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll'
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'sqldumper.exe' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE'
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '2011.110:5058.0'
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '11.0:5058.0'
    (2240:89C) 08/14/14 10:51:56, ACTION,                DTExec.exe, Watson Invoke: No
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Input parameters: 4 supplied
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,        Parameter 1: 8856
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,        Parameter 2: 0
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,        Parameter 3: 0:0
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,        Parameter 4: 009AB770
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Parsed parameters:
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ProcessID = 8856
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ThreadId = 0
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Flags = 0x0
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     MiniDumpFlags = 0x0
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     SqlInfoPtr = 0x009AB770
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     DumpDir = <NULL>
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExceptionRecordPtr = 0x00000000
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ContextPtr = 0x00000000
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExtraFile = <NULL>
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     InstanceName = <NULL>
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ServiceName = <NULL>
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 11 not used
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 15 not used
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 7 not used
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, MiniDump completed: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\ErrorDumps\SQLDmpr0010.mdmp
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'dbghelp.dll' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll'
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'sqldumper.exe' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE'
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '2011.110:5058.0'
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '11.0:5058.0'
    (7B8:1E68) 08/14/14 11:01:36, ACTION,                DTExec.exe, Watson Invoke: No
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Input parameters: 4 supplied
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 1: 1292
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 2: 0
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 3: 0:0
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 4: 00BFB770
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Parsed parameters:
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ProcessID = 1292
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ThreadId = 0
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Flags = 0x0
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     MiniDumpFlags = 0x0
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     SqlInfoPtr = 0x00BFB770
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     DumpDir = <NULL>
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExceptionRecordPtr = 0x00000000
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ContextPtr = 0x00000000
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExtraFile = <NULL>
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     InstanceName = <NULL>
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ServiceName = <NULL>
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 11 not used
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 15 not used
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 7 not used
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, MiniDump completed: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\ErrorDumps\SQLDmpr0011.mdmp
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'dbghelp.dll' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll'
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'sqldumper.exe' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE'
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '2011.110:5058.0'
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '11.0:5058.0'
    (229C:1CD8) 08/14/14 11:45:45, ACTION,                DTExec.exe, Watson Invoke: No
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Input parameters: 4 supplied
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,      Parameter 1: 4220
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,      Parameter 2: 0
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,      Parameter 3: 0:0
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,      Parameter 4: 0019B770
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Parsed parameters:
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ProcessID = 4220
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ThreadId = 0
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Flags = 0x0
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     MiniDumpFlags = 0x0
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     SqlInfoPtr = 0x0019B770
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     DumpDir = <NULL>
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExceptionRecordPtr = 0x00000000
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ContextPtr = 0x00000000
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExtraFile = <NULL>
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     InstanceName = <NULL>
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ServiceName = <NULL>
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 11 not used
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 15 not used
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 7 not used
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, MiniDump completed: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\ErrorDumps\SQLDmpr0012.mdmp
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'dbghelp.dll' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll'
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'sqldumper.exe' : 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE'
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '2011.110:5058.0'
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '11.0:5058.0'
    (2520:2624) 08/14/14 12:05:47, ACTION,                DTExec.exe, Watson Invoke: No
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Input parameters: 4 supplied
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 1: 8408
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 2: 0
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 3: 0:0
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Parameter 4: 00000000003ECC18
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Parsed parameters:
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ProcessID = 8408
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ThreadId = 0
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     Flags = 0x0
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     MiniDumpFlags = 0x0
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     SqlInfoPtr = 0x00000000003ECC18
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     DumpDir = <NULL>
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExceptionRecordPtr = 0x0000000000000000
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ContextPtr = 0x0000000000000000
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ExtraFile = <NULL>
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     InstanceName = <NULL>
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE,     ServiceName = <NULL>
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 11 not used
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:48, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 15 not used
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:50, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Callback type 7 not used
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:50, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, MiniDump completed: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\ErrorDumps\SQLDmpr0001.mdmp
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:50, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'dbghelp.dll' : 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll'
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:50, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:50, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\dbghelp.dll' : '6.12:2.633'
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:50, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Location of module 'sqldumper.exe' : 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE'
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:50, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, File version of module 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '2011.110:5058.0'
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:50, ACTION, SQLDUMPER_UNKNOWN_APP.EXE, Product version of module 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Shared\SQLDUMPER.EXE' : '11.0:5058.0'
    (1B5C:20C0) 08/18/14 14:21:50, ACTION,                DTExec.exe, Watson Invoke: No

    Hi GaryAMiller,
    It seesm this is a know ssue. Please take a look at the following simialr issue at Microsoft Connect site:
    MSB3270: Mismatch between the processor architecture:
    https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/804933/msb3270-mismatch-between-the-processor-architecture-fakes-framework
    If this issue still persists, I would suggest
    opening a case with Microsoft Customer Support Services (CSS)(http://support.microsoft.com), so that a dedicated Support Professional can assist you in a more efficient manner.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here.
    Elvis Long
    TechNet Community Support

  • Mismatch between sound and video

    When I watch a movie in iTunes of Apple TV (2gen) and I want to move it few seconds/ minutes and more backwards then it like "losing its mind",
    the video jumps forward (a lot forward) and the sound stays the same, so ther is mismatchment between sound and video.
    What can i do to solve this problem?
    Thank you!

    Am I the only one suffering this issue with the video transcoding?

  • Mismatch between the processor architecture of the project being built "MSIL" and the processor architecture of the reference "RsiDotNetDll", "x86".

                    I’m facing a problem while implementing an application on azure I have a dll that is of x86 architecture and is referred
    in my application. It is the core or base of my application. When I run that application locally it runs fine but when I try to publish that application to Azure from Visual studio 13. It shows an error that the dll and its dependencies are missing. 
    And it giving an error like :
    Warning 1 There was a mismatch between the processor architecture of the project being built "MSIL" and the processor architecture of the reference "RsiDotNetDll",
    "x86". This mismatch may cause runtime failures

    Hi Suresh,
    Thanks for your posting!
    I am trying to involve someone familiar with this topic to further look at this issue. There might be some time delay. Appreciate your patience.
    Best Regards,
    Will
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Config mismatch between VSM and VPath - CSCum76142 bug

    Hi all,
    I got the error message "Config mismatch between VSM and VPath" on my Nexus VSM but I could not see any detail regarding this bug ID due to permission issue. Has anyone else got access to see this bug detail and able to share? I need to know if this bug is critical or just cosmetic. Thanks 
    regards,
    Robin

    Hi Robin,
    This DDTS was Junked. But here's the workaround that is mentioned:
    1. Deleting the vservice config (no vservice) & reconfiguring vservice, will get rid of this mismatch issue.
    2. Toggling the port-profile should also work.
    I see couple of other DDTS as well related to this and i would suggest to ask this question in "Other  Data Center Subjects" forum for detailed and quick answer.
    CSCtz36835 :Config mismatch on VSM and Vpath after deleting service vlan
    Regards,
    Kanwal
    Note: Please mark answers if they are helpful.

  • Security processor was unable to find a security header in the message. This might be because the message is an unsecured fault or because there is a binding mismatch between the communicating parties.

    We have a web role where we have hosted a WCF service.
    We are facing the below exception intermittently on consuming the service.
    Security processor was unable to find a security header in the message. This might be because the message is an unsecured fault or because there is a binding mismatch between the communicating parties.   This
    can occur if the service is configured for security and the client is not using security.
    This is intermittent. Few calls fail , and the subsequent calls succeed without making any changes.
    Please help in overcoming this abnormal behavior.
    Thanks in advance !!
    Best Regards ,
    Eswar

    Hi Eswar,
    As the error message mentioned, it may be a mismatch between the configuration on the client and the server.Try putting all your configuration in a binding configuration and then use the same binding configuration on the server and client. Since this issue
    is more related with WCF, I suggest you move to WCF forum, it is appropriate and more experts will assist you.
    Best Regards,
    Jambor
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • GL Balances are different in FS10N & FBL3N

    Hi Experts,
    User is facing the Issue for Balance Difference in FS10N & FBL3N. In FS10N the balance is 84536.49- but in FBL3N it is 84,536.53-.
    Earlier the difference was 0.02 & now it 0.04. All the balance are carry forwarded properly.
    Please advise.
    Thanks 

    HI ,
    All the accounting entries are in BSEG table .
    If difference is that old it would be very difficult to find out but still I I WOULD SUGGEST you to run both transaction for each year to find out in which year the difference is and once you know which year please run the transaction for each month ( period ) . this will allow you locate exact month of Difference . then Please check the each and every entry for that month you will be able to locate the document as well.
    I know that this is huge amount of work but sorry we can't use any shot cut .
    Many Thanks
    Regards
    Preeti

  • Data mismatch between 10g and 11g.

    Hi
    We recently upgraded OBIEE to 11.1.1.6.0 from 10.1.3.4.0. While testing we found data mismatch between 10g and 11g in-case of few reports which are including a front end calculated column with division included in it, say for example ("- Paycheck"."Earnings" / COUNT(DISTINCT "- Pay"."Check Date")) / 25.
    The data is matching for the below scenarios.
    1) When the column is removed from both 10g and 11g.
    2) When the aggregation rule is set to either "Sum or Count" in both 10g and 11g.
    It would be very helpful and greatly appreciated if any workaround/pointers to solve this issue is provided.
    Thanks

    jfedynic wrote:
    The 10g and 11.1.0.7 Databases are currently set to AL32UTF8.
    In each database there is a VARCHAR2 field used to store data, but not specifically AL32UTF8 data but encrypted data.
    Using the 10g Client to connect to either the 10g database or 11g database it works fine.
    Using the 11.1.0.7 Client to go against either the 10g or 11g database and it produces the error: ORA-29275: partial multibyte character
    What has changed?
    Was it considered a Bug in 10g because it allowed this behavior and now 11g is operating correctly?
    29275, 00000, "partial multibyte character"
    // *Cause:  The requested read operation could not complete because a partial
    //          multibyte character was found at the end of the input.
    // *Action: Ensure that the complete multibyte character is sent from the
    //          remote server and retry the operation. Or read the partial
    //          multibyte character as RAW.It appears to me a bug got fixed.

  • There is a compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database

    HI,
    Taken backup form production environment through TSM backup utility and restore same db on UAT environment by TSM Utility, after restore got below issue, past i had done many time but working fine this time
    it’s not working. Production environment have SP2010 and sql server 2008 ,UAT have same thing also.
    Server Error in '/' Application.
    There is a
    compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database "Portal_Contain", and connections to the data have been blocked to due to this incompatibility. This can
    happen when a content database has not been upgraded to be within the compatibility range of the Web server, or if the database has been upgraded to a higher level than the web server. The Web server and the database must be upgraded to the same version and
    build level to return to compatibility range.
    Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current
    web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. 
    Exception Details: Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUpgradeCompatibilityException:
    There is a compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database "Portal_Contain", and connections to the data have been blocked to due to this incompatibility. This can happen when a content database has not been upgraded to be within
    the compatibility range of the Web server, or if the database has been upgraded to a higher level than the web server. The Web server and the database must be upgraded to the same version and build level to return to compatibility range.
    Source Error:
    An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack
    trace below.
    Stack Trace:
    [SPUpgradeCompatibilityException: There is a compatibility range mismatch between the Web server and database "Portal_Contain", and connections to the data have been
    blocked to due to this incompatibility. This can happen when a content database has not been upgraded to be within the compatibility range of the Web server, or if the database has been upgraded to a higher level than the web server. The Web server and the
    database must be upgraded to the same version and build level to return to compatibility range.]
       Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPPersistedUpgradableObject.ValidateBackwardsCompatibility() +542
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSite.PreinitializeServer(SPRequest request) +63
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.InitializeSPRequest() +258
       Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.SPControl.EnsureSPWebRequest(SPWeb web) +365
       Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.SPControl.SPWebEnsureSPControl(HttpContext context) +520
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.GetContextWeb(HttpContext context) +27
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.PostResolveRequestCacheHandler(Object oSender, EventArgs ea) +918
       System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +80
       System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +171
    Hasan Jamal Siddiqui(MCTS,MCPD,ITIL@V3),Sharepoint and EPM Consultant,TCS
    |
    | Twitter

    Hi Bhavik,
    UAT Portal_Contain DB version given below:
    Version ID
    Version
    id
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.4518
    1
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6219
    3
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6327
    4
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6421
    5
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6510
    6
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6514
    7
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    14.0.6123.5006
    9
    1A707EF5-45B2-4235-9327-021E5F9B8BB0
    4.1.6.0
    8
    6333368D-85F0-4EF5-8241-5252B12B2E50
    4.1.18.0
    2
    Production Version given below:
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.4518
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6219
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6327
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6421
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6510
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    12.0.0.6514
    00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
    14.0.6123.5006
    1A707EF5-45B2-4235-9327-021E5F9B8BB0
    4.1.6.0
    6333368D-85F0-4EF5-8241-5252B12B2E50
    4.1.18.0
    I have matched both are the exact same.
    Run the below command on App server:
    Upgrade-SPContentDatabase
    cmdlet Upgrade-SPContentDatabase at command pipeline position 1
    Supply values for the following parameters:
    Identity: Portal_Contain
    Confirm
    Are you sure you want to perform this action?
    Performing operation "Upgrade-SPContentDatabase" on Target "Portal_Contain".
    [Y] Yes  [A] Yes to All  [N] No  [L] No to All  [S] Suspend  [?] Help
    (default is "Y"):y
    WARNING: Database [SPContentDatabase Name=Portal_Contain] cannot be upgraded.
    Kindly suggest 
    Hasan Jamal Siddiqui(MCTS,MCPD,ITIL@V3),Sharepoint and EPM Consultant,TCS
    |
    | Twitter

Maybe you are looking for