Missing one Index.dbf

Hello all,
After a database crash, I found that the backup has miss a index dbf file. Can I start the database without the missing index dbf file
Thank !!!

I believe I need to clarify my previous post in an effort to be more complete.
If there was only one datafile in the tablespace:
startup mount;
alter database datafile 'ddddd.dbf' offline drop; (only in non-archivelog log mode)
alter database open;
drop tablespace index including contents;
or if there was more than one:
startup mount;
alter database create datafile 'aaaa.dbf' as 'aaaa.dbf';
alter database open;
You will have to do media recovery on the new file to return it to the state of the old file at the time it was lost.
shutdown and startup. Check the alert log for errors.

Similar Messages

Not Picking up one Index..!

hi,
I am Using Oracle 10g Version--10.2.0.1.0. I am getting one problem with this query what was the problem i don't understand it is not picking up one index which it is there in indexes. X_PCAT--P_CAT is the index and column from PARTY.
This is the Query..!
SELECT P_CODE , P_NAME, P_OB, P_CAT, P_SUB_CAT, P_BANK, P_PHONE1 || ' ' || P_PHONE2 || ' ' || P_PHONER, P_INTRO1, P_INTRO2, P_INTRO3
FROM SYSADM.PARTY WHERE ( P_CAT = 'DAHMEDABAD' ) AND
( P_OB != 0 OR
EXISTS ( SELECT DISTINCT CB_P_CODE FROM SYSADM.CASH_BOOK WHERE P_CODE = CB_P_CODE) OR
EXISTS ( SELECT DISTINCT B_PARTY FROM SYSADM.BILLS WHERE P_CODE = B_PARTY ) ) ORDER BY 4, 5, 1 ;
this is the Explain Plan for the above query..!
SELECT P_CODE , P_NAME, P_OB, P_CAT, P_SUB_CAT, P_BANK, P_PHONE1 || ' ' || P_PHONE2 || ' ' || P_PHONER, P_INTRO1, P_INTRO2, P_INTRO3
FROM SYSADM.PARTY WHERE ( P_CAT = 'DAHMEDABAD' ) AND
( P_OB != 0 OR
EXISTS ( SELECT DISTINCT CB_P_CODE FROM SYSADM.CASH_BOOK WHERE P_CODE = CB_P_CODE) OR
EXISTS ( SELECT DISTINCT B_PARTY FROM SYSADM.BILLS WHERE P_CODE = B_PARTY ) ) ORDER BY 4, 5, 1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 62 0.14 1.49 3150 12049 0 1237
total 64 0.14 1.50 3150 12049 0 1237
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 58
Rows Row Source Operation
1237 SORT ORDER BY (cr=12049 pr=3150 pw=0 time=1495964 us)
1237 FILTER (cr=12049 pr=3150 pw=0 time=2962198 us)
2025 TABLE ACCESS FULL PARTY (cr=3527 pr=3150 pw=0 time=2004395 us)
1210 INDEX RANGE SCAN XCB_PARTY (cr=6077 pr=0 pw=0 time=28572 us)(object id 49459)
27 INDEX RANGE SCAN XB_PARTY (cr=2445 pr=0 pw=0 time=11430 us)(object id 49462)
So any wrong in this query.

An explain plan properly created using DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY would be immensely helpful.
So would knowing what index it is you think should be used by Oracle to do what?
One thing I can tell you is that the construct P_OB != 0 OR is not one likely to favor index usage unless almost every value in the column is 0 and Oracle's decision to not use an index is affecting you in what way? Is the query taking too long or are you just fixating on the incorrect thought that full table scans are always bad: They are not.
PS: Give serious consideration to patching to 10.2.0.3.

LogFileNotFoundException from one index but not another in DPL

Hi folks,
I have an entity type in the DPL called an Item. It has various secondary keys. When I try to use the "type" of the item to get all items of a particular type, I get a LogFileNotFoundException (the log file is clearly gone, and we have no processes that could delete them):
EntityIndex index = itemByType.subIndex(type.ordinal());
EntityCursor<ItemImpl> cur = index.entities();
try {
    for(ItemImpl i : cur) {
        items.add(i);
} finally {
    cur.close();
}The exception occurs in the implicit hasNext in the for loop:
Caused by: com.sleepycat.je.DatabaseException: (JE 3.3.75) fetchTarget of 0xf/0x6ccfd parent IN=80127 IN class=com.sleepycat.je.tree.DBIN lastFullVersion=0x21/0x61c37 parent.getDirty()=false state=0 com.sleepycat.je.log.LogFileNotFoundException: (JE 3.3.75) 0xf/0x6ccfd (JE 3.3.75) Couldn't open file /files/data/db/0000000f.jdb: /files/data/db/0000000f.jdb (No such file or directory)
     at com.sleepycat.je.tree.IN.fetchTarget(IN.java:1230)
     at com.sleepycat.je.dbi.CursorImpl.fetchCurrent(CursorImpl.java:2320)
     at com.sleepycat.je.dbi.CursorImpl.getCurrentAlreadyLatched(CursorImpl.java:1427)
     at com.sleepycat.je.dbi.CursorImpl.getNextDuplicate(CursorImpl.java:1745)
     at com.sleepycat.je.Cursor.retrieveNextAllowPhantoms(Cursor.java:2187)
     at com.sleepycat.je.Cursor.retrieveNext(Cursor.java:1991)
     at com.sleepycat.je.SecondaryCursor.retrieveNext(SecondaryCursor.java:1497)
     at com.sleepycat.je.SecondaryCursor.getNextDup(SecondaryCursor.java:676)
     at com.sleepycat.util.keyrange.RangeCursor.doGetNextDup(RangeCursor.java:907)
     at com.sleepycat.util.keyrange.RangeCursor.getNext(RangeCursor.java:445)
     at com.sleepycat.persist.BasicCursor.next(BasicCursor.java:81)
     at com.sleepycat.persist.BasicIterator.hasNext(BasicIterator.java:50)Curiously, if I get the same data by using a different index (one indexed by a type/time composite key), I don't hit any exceptions.
Some possibly relevant data:
This occurred shortly after upgrading from .69 to .75. I didn't deploy the update, but I'm told that it worked initially after the update, but then the service was restarted a second time a day or so later (for other unrelated changes) and this exception started to happen sometime after the second restart.
Restarting the process doesn't seem to change anything.
There are about 64K "items" in the database, and about 66K of other types.
We have 15 other databases with the same schema but different data (and roughly the same amount of data as this one). They are all functioning fine, and have had roughly equal amount of load/churn on them as the corrupt database.
The log file in question exists for most of our other databases, but is missing in a few (which I think should mean that it is reasonable to expect that it could have been "garbage collected" on the corrupt database).
The database seems to be about 195MB so it is somewhat portable.
So I have two questions:
1) Is this likely to be a result of something that I did in my code? Obviously the snippet above didn't use a transaction explicitly, but most other code does, including any writes. (And my understanding is that an implicit transaction is used in that snippet if the DB is transactional otherwise)
2) Assuming that the log file in question wasn't spuriously deleted by some log file gnome, is there any way that we can recover from this in general? This may be the wrong question, but is it possible to rebuild an index that thinks an old log file is still there?
Thanks!
Jeff

Hello all,
I'd like to let everyone know that the problem reported by Jeff is the result of a JE bug that was introduced in JE 3.3.62 and recently fixed in JE 3.3.76. JE 3.3.76 is not yet published, and we don't have a date doing that yet, but if would like a copy of it now, please send me email -- mark.hayes at the obvious (oracle) .com.
Below is the change log entry for the bug. Although the bug occurs rarely, any app that configures duplicates (or a MANY_TO_XXX secondary key relationship) could be impacted. The result of the bug is data loss, and reverting to a backup is necessary.
Change log entry:
Fix a bug that caused LogFileNotFoundException in rare circumstances for an Environment having one or more Databases configured for duplicates (or one or more SecondaryIndexes with MANY_TO_XXX relationships). The bug only occurs when a single secondary/duplicate key value is associated with a large number of records/entities; specifically, the sub-Btree for a single duplicate key value must have at least 3 levels. SR #16712
Thanks, Jeff, for your help on this.
--mark

Missing the Index: Photoshop CS5 Help Documentation (photoshop_cs5_help.pdf)

I have downloaded and use the Photoshop help PDF (photoshop_cs5_help.pdf) fairly extensively, but it's missing one key element: the index. The index, of course, is invaluable when trying to search for a solution to a problem. The previous PDF for cs4 had an index. I'm wondering if the index is under development - or, heaven forbid, if it's being eliminated.
Thanks in advance.

Ron,
I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall when the Product Marketing Manager gave up the Index, if he fought for us end users at all? I cannot imagine with such a complex product why they would scrap it! Cost savings is my guess. My vote would have been to leave out a new feature or two and leave the index in.

Help, am I missing an index page?

Hey everyone,
I just created a site, very simple splash page for one of my bands, with rollover image buttons to forward the public off to other websites.
I've connected to my site via FTP, using CS4 to upload all the files in my site's home folder on my computer.
However when I go to my URL in my browser, I get a page not found notice..I spoke with the company that I bought the domain off of, and a rep said that I am missing the index file on the server, I guess he means the script to make sense of all the buttons that i created.
my templates folder is on the server, with my 'splashpage.dwt' and 'splashpage.htm' files both there. I guess these are not the appropriate files for the webpage to run??
Does anyone know what file I need to create, and upload to my domain's file manager in order to get my site to appear??
any help is greatly appreciated.
thanks,
Mark.

There's no reason whatsoever to have your Template folder on the server unless you would want to share the files with someone. The *.dwt files have NO effect at the server level. THey only mean something to Dreamweaver and can only affect local files.
Further, please take a look in your child page (splashpage.htm) and see if you see any markup in Code view that looks like this -
<!-- TemplateBeginEditable
If you do then you are not using templates properly and will experience failures soon.

What does "Missing reverse index on remove: value=null" mean

I am getting this error in my Coherence Debug Logs, what does this error mean ?
Thanks
14:46:24,923 WARN Coherence:3 - 2009-05-06 14:46:24.923 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4/405p1 <Warning> (thread=dist-customer-serviceWorker:1, member=25): Missing reverse index on remove: value=null,
key=Binary(length=102, value=0x0DB53915AADDGFDF...etc

I am still seeing this message (but as a info message) in 3.6.0.1. The test case is a single cache node and a single "client" that is inserting a lot of data. I have like 6 indexes defined (all using POF extractors). One index contains an array of a user type, the others primitive types. One index is sorted the rest not.
Imho the condition causing this should be fixed or, if this is not causing any problems, performance or otherwise, the message be removed - pperation should be undisturbed by messages that has no meaning to the user!
2010-08-19 08:42:57.718/50.860 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=432}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DB30315A33E000041BC010141A5CC0140)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.718/50.860 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=1117}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DB40315A33E0000419B140141A4C40140)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.718/50.860 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=3194}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DB50315A33E0000419D2E0141A7CC0140)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.734/50.876 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=542}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DB90315A33E00004192450141BC900240)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.734/50.876 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=4042}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DBB0315A33E000041940A01419C890340)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.734/50.876 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=4733}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DBC0315A33E000041BC1D014191D90240)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.734/50.876 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=1632}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DBE0315A33E000041B43E0141B1D00140)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.749/50.891 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=2490}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0D800415A33E00004196310141BEFC0140)
/Magnus

Multi-column Index vs One index for each column

Hello everyone,
i have one table about 20 000 000 rows, some developers have to generate reports on it and i want to create indexes on this table.
The table has 34 columns, no primary key, no unique keys.
The "where..." clause of the reports usually use 8 columns but some reports uses 8 + some other columns.
can any one help me on what kind of indexes do i have to create?
1. one index for each column used in "where clause"
2. one index for 8 columns and some other indexes for other used columns
3. one index for all columns
or something else etc...
br flag

i have one table about 20 000 000 rows, some developers have to generate reports on it and i want to create indexes on this table.
The table has 34 columns, no primary key, no unique keys.
The "where..." clause of the reports usually use 8 columns but some reports uses 8 + some other columns.
can any one help me on what kind of indexes do i have to create?
1. one index for each column used in "where clause"
2. one index for 8 columns and some other indexes for other used columns
3. one index for all columns
or something else etc...What's the version of your data base? what kind of database you have, DWH or OTLP? The answer might depend on the type of database as far as bitmap indexes might suit or might not depending if you are runing DWH or OLTP kind of database
Let me suppose that you are runing OLTP database and you have a where clause with 8 columns.
1) are all those where clause equalities (where col1 = and col2 =) or there are inequalities?
2) could you evaluate the most repetitive columns?
3) could you know the column that could have the best clustering factor (the column which most follow a certain order in the table)
Based on that I would suggest to create one b-tree index having 8 columns (even though that it seems for me to high) this index should follow the following points:
1) put the most repetitive column at the leading edge (and compress the index if necessary)
2) put the columns that are used in equalitity predicate first
3) put the column having the best clustering factor first
The most precise index you have the best access you could gain.
Of course that you have to know that an index access is not always good and a FULL table scan is not always bad.
Best regards
Mohamed Houri
www.hourim.wordpress.com

More than one index for a column.

Hi,
I am trying to create more than one index for a particular column of the table.But oracle does not allow more than one index for a column.
I just want to make sure whether we can add more than one index for a column
and if yes what are the scenarios.
Because as far as i know some database allows more than one index for a single column.

You cannot create more than one index for the same column(s).This is not so true Nicolas. Look at following example:
SQL> create index idx_mytest_id on mytest(id);
Index created.
SQL> create index idx_mytest_id_desc on mytest(id desc);
Index created.
SQL> create index idx_fbi_mytest_id_upper on mytest(upper(id));
Index created.
SQL> create index idx_fbi_mytest_id_upper_desc on mytest(upper(id) desc);
Index created.
SQL> create index idx_fbi_mytest_id_lower_id on mytest(lower(id));
Index created.
SQL> create index idx_fbi_mytest_id_lower_id_dsc on mytest(lower(id) desc);
Index created.
SQL> create index idx_fbi_mytest_id_tr_up on mytest(trunc(upper(id)));
Index created.
-- I can still continue but for this example this will be enough
SQL> select index_name from dba_indexes where table_name = 'MYTEST';
INDEX_NAME
IDX_MYTEST_ID
IDX_FBI_MYTEST_ID_UPPER
IDX_MYTEST_ID_DESC
IDX_FBI_MYTEST_ID_UPPER_DESC
IDX_FBI_MYTEST_ID_LOWER_ID
IDX_FBI_MYTEST_ID_LOWER_ID_DSC
IDX_FBI_MYTEST_ID_TR_UP
7 rows selected.You can see 7 indexes for one column (ID) and I could still continue...
So according this test we can say you can't create more than one index for one column (or the same group of columns in case of composite index) with same condition(s).
Message was edited by:
Ivan Kartik
Or simplified: you can't create the same index for same column(s) twice :-)

How to set only one Index-group for a Search-iView as default?

Hi Everybody,
i have a lot of index ID's for searching in different folders. Is it possible to set only one index-group as default for a search iView? Until now i get all groups as default in every search. It's inconvenient for the users to use the link of 'show options' in order to uncheck the other index ID's.
regards,
Seed
Edited by: seed_mopo on Jun 6, 2008 5:02 PM

hi Seed,
To achieve this you have to follow the below steps
1. Create a new set of search options, choose System Administration -> System Configuration -> Knowledge Management -> Content Management -> User Interface -> Search -> Search Options Set in the portal.
In that you have a field 'Index Groups', wherein you can specify which index group, the user has to search in. If there are multiple index groups, mention your index groups separated by comma.
See here for more information
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cc/f4e77ddef1244380b06fee5f8b892a/content.htm
2. You have to specify the option set that you created in step 1 in the default KM search iview. In the iview properties, under the field search option set, mention the option set that was created for this index group or multiple index groups.
This way, you can configure KM search iview to search in a single index group or multiple index groups.
Revert back in case of any queries
Regards,
Ganesh N

Missing primary index

Hi All
In db02 under diagnostics we can see the missing table and indexes. I just want to know the which backend program actually triggers or from which tables is referring to finds out the missing primary indexes in database and particulary shows which object has an inconsistency of it.
Thanks
Siva

Hi All
In db02 under diagnostics we can see the missing table and indexes. I just want to know the which backend program actually triggers or from which tables is referring to finds out the missing primary indexes in database and particulary shows which object has an inconsistency of it.
Thanks
Siva

Issue on deployment: Solution Deployment : Missing one or more of the following attributes from the root node in solution .wsp: assembly '', type ''

Hi,
I have the following issue when deploying:
Solution Deployment : Missing one or more of the following attributes from the root node in solution .wsp: assembly '', type ''
The solution is a farm solution (was never sandbox) and it deploys fine.
It was updated several times with success. We did not see this issue until recently when we had some other issue (unrelated) and looked at the logs. The solution is updated without problem and updates are available for the user. But we can see this error
in the logs at the update time.
Any idea what might cause this?
Pop Anisia

Hi，
This error is wide meaning, as it can come from differences between SP versions, variables types used, bad manifest file, WebConfiguration ...
You can try to redeploy the solution.
retracted the solution,removed all the previous ref, removed dll from GAC and folder from 14\features and reset the iis, deploying it again.
Here are some similar issue post, you can use as a reference:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/72ac9a02-3a51-48b8-9e36-3b24a2d4da74/missing-one-or-more-of-the-following-attributes-from-the-root-node-in-solution-alertbdcwsp?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/331af288-5ba6-48a7-9e9d-ac4e4bc8f8fa/missing-one-or-more-of-the-following-attributes-from-the-root-node-in-solution-xxxwsp-assembly-?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
In additional, you can check the ULS log (C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\LOGS) to get the detailed information.
I hope this helpful.
Best Regards，
Lisa Chen
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Reoccuring missing secondary indexes in BI systems

Hi Gurus,
I'm been experiencing the problem of missing secondary indexes for some time, and I would like to get to the bottom of this problem.
These are a few of the missing indexes (from DB02):-
/BIC/F100294-900
/BIC/F100365-900
/BIC/F100366-900
/BIC/F100368-900
/BIC/F100369-900
/BIC/F100386-900
/BIC/FZCFIGRLP-900
/BIC/FZCGLECRD-900
/BIC/FZCGLECRD2-900
/BIC/FZCGLECRD3-900
TSP03-1
TSP03L-A
Any idea what could be causing this???
And how do I solve this problem??? And how can I prevent these from reoccuring again???
Thanks.
Cheers,
KeatSeong

I see missing indexes on DB02 as well and ran SAP_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPAIR and I just have a couple more questions that I think is relevant to this chain:
1) It repaired some fact indexes like /BIC/F* and dimension indexes like /BIC/D* but in the report showed as follows for those cubes:
0 ZPP_C008 : 0 secondary indexes repaired.
2) I had some other dimension indexes like /BIC/D* that did not get repaired and I'm wondering why. See 4) below for how I repaired those.
3) I ran RSRV and these missing indexes like /BIC/D* do not show up as being an issue
4) When I run RSDU_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPAIR on that missing index like /BIC/D* I get E_REPAIRED = 0 and system error: RSDU_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPA_ORA but when I refresh DB02 the index is gone. When I go to RSDU_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPA_ORA and run it I got e_reparied - 11
Thanks for all your help.
Mike
Edited by: Michael Hill on May 26, 2010 6:49 PM

Missing secondary indexes

Hello Gurus,
Hope you are doing good ! I have few missing secondary indexes. I have corrected them in rsrv with the correct error option but still most of them seem to be back in DB02. Warnings have occured for few cubes being : Oracle:Index/BI0/SDOC_NUMBER~0 has possible degenareted.
I checked in the process chains but the indexes are successfully built. Any sugestions pls let me know.
Kind Regards,
Sunitha

Hi Sunitha,
Try checking these indices from cube/DSO Performance tab and try with the repair option available there.
Sometimes, it might be possible to the tablespace problem to build the indices. Check those too also from DB02.
Regards,
Srinivas.

FBL5N: missing one line item while viewing the report in spool

Hi Experts,
I 've got a problem while viewing FBL5N report in spool. The report is missing one line item, but when I
execute it in foreground, the report was ok.
Can somebody explain?
TQ.

Hello,
It seems you should implement notes 1100728 and 1166251 !
Best Regards,
Glayds xing

Missing inverse index on remove?

When pre-loading a cache with data I get the following text on the storage nodes. What is likely to be wrong with my cluster/configuration? As far as I know I am using the latest 3.5 release (I know there weresome problem causing a similar message to be printed in an earlier release).
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A09C8A0101419C877E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A09C8A0101419C877E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A09C8A0101419C877E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x1584590000419AFF89010141B9A47E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x1584590000419AFF89010141B9A47E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x1584590000419AFF89010141B9A47E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.722/45.015 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A2998A010141988E7E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.722/45.015 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A2998A010141988E7E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.722/45.015 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A2998A010141988E7E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.847/45.140 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004195EF89010141B2817E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.847/45.140 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004195EF89010141B2817E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.847/45.140 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004195EF89010141B2817E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004184F7890101419A957E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004184F7890101419A957E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004184F7890101419A957E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041BA848A01014193897E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041BA848A01014193897E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041BA848A01014193897E40)
/Magnus

It seemed like I have specified a to low max size on my back cache causing loaded objects to be evicted. Not sure why that caused this info message though...
/Magnus

Missing one Index.dbf

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for