CQ Sites with many registered users

Hi
With CQ 5.2.1 I tried to setup a mass-user site registering users as standard CQ users --> more than 50.000 users.
I soon discovered that user creation started to slow a lot (40-50 seconds to create a new user) and decided then to manage users in a different way.
Analyzing the node structure for users:
/home/users/<first_letter_username>/**** 1 folder for each username
It's clear that with thousands of nodes, childs of <first_letter_username> folders will grow a lot.  If there is one thing I have understood with JCR is: 'please don't put too many childs in the same folder'. A new node creation tends to become pretty slow, near blocking.
On that solution (5.2.1) I moved to a database approach to manage my user data and authentication. Now I'm facing similar scenarios on 5.4 instance and would like to use embedded CQ user management
My question... the above mentioned user structure in the repository is still there in CQ 5.4. Am I going toward performance issues when creating thousands of users?
What about newsletter registrations? if I want to use newsletters in MCM I'm going to insert many users in these folders. Are there any performance issues I might consider? Or best practices to follow?
thanks

  Hi,
        Planning to work with a site with a lot of users as well.   Did you use a database or LDAP on CQ 5.4  to manage a large number of users?
Thanks,

Similar Messages

  • Error while Authenticating sharepoint site with Azure AD users using Azure Access Control Namespace

    I have a Sharepoint site running on Azure virtual Machine. Now i want to authenticate my sharepoint site with Azure AD users.
    For this i have followed below link, but getting error after login.
    Using Microsoft Azure Active Directory for SharePoint 2013 authentication
    I have implemented as given on reference link, but still facing error. When i access my url from browser, it will ask me through which you want to logon.
    Then on selection of ACS Provider, it will redirect me to office365 login. After i submit my credentials, it will redirect me to
    https://testvm.cloudapp.net/_trust/
    and got error. So i checked in sharepoint log and found below error.
    Cannot find site lookup info for request Uri urn:sharepoint:spvms.
    SPAudienceValidator: Audience uri 'urn:sharepoint:spvms is not valid for the context.
    Getting Error Message for Exception Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.FailedAuthenticationException: The Audience URI could not be validated.
    SPSaml11SecurityTokenHandler: Audience validation failed for request 'https://testvm.cloudapp.net/_trust/' with
    the following audience URIs: 'urn:sharepoint:spvms', .
    Application error when access /_trust/, Error=The Audience URI could not be validated.
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSaml11SecurityTokenHandler.ValidateConditions(SamlConditions conditions, Boolean enforceAudienceRestriction)
    at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.Saml11.Saml11SecurityTokenHandler.ValidateToken(SecurityToken token)
    at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.SecurityTokenHandlerCollection.ValidateToken(SecurityToken token)
    at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Web.TokenReceiver.AuthenticateToken(SecurityToken token, Boolean ensureBearerToken, String endpointUri)
    at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Web.WSFederationAuthenticationModule.SignInWithResponseMessage(HttpRequest request)
    at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Web.WSFederationAuthenticationModule.OnAuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs args)
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPFederationAuthenticationModule.OnAuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs eventArgs)
    at System.Web.HttpApplication.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
    at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)

    I want 100,000 external users to have access to my SharePoint online Site collection.
    I was thinking of going the Azure AD route, where external users will have there ID's created in Azure AD cloud.
    Trying to figure how I can integrate Azure AD cloud with my SharePoint Online Site collection.
    Currently my site collection is tied to On-premise AD.
    Is there a way to integrate the SharePoint online to use both Azure AD and On-premise AD?
    Thanks
    Nate
    Any Answer here?

  • Messaging performance problem on RAID disk with many IMAP users

    The performance problem can be solved by tunning the disc RAID system.

    The performance problem can be solved by tunning the disc RAID system.

  • Remote Site with its own CUCM Sub#2 and Router network failed and the site didnt keep its phones active, need some assistance

    I have a Pub and 2 Sub's.  Sub #1 is with the Pub, at the main site it is our TFTP server, Sub #2 is at a remote site with about 100 users along with a router and 2 PRI's for outbound calls.  We had a network failure between the main site and the remote site and all phone lost their registration with the system until we were able to get the network back up.   Currently the network is up in a crippled state on a 1 T-1 link while we troubleshoot the bigger issue with our 6mb pipe, however Sub #2 and its associated router arent talking with the PUB or other Sub.  I'm still getting alerts every 30 minutes stating they are the server is down.  I'm sure once the network is corrected this will bring everything back on line.  My question is how can I prevent in this in the future.  I need this site to be stand alone if the network goes down again.  I was told by our vendor that if we had a subscriber at each site then we would need SRST licensing. I know something needs to be configured to make it all work, I'm just not sure what.

    I already have a group at the site but it includes both the Pub and Sub from the main site as well as the Sub from the remote site.  I would only have to remove the Sub from the main site, problem is I currently only have 1 TFTP server it runs on SUB #1, should I make SUB#2 a TFTP server as well and the phones are setup for DHCP at the main site, I'm going to need to have a DHCP server setup at the remote site as well. Correct?

  • Securing webpages on the site with username and password

    whats the best way to secure web pages on a web site.
    if the users are given user name and password and are required to autheticate before accessing the information on the secured pages

    It depends on many parameters. Like what is the nature of business transacted on the web site, how many end users are to be supported, whether its and intranet sote or is exposed to all on the internet, are there users who can perform opertions using multiple roles, can the authentication mechanisms built into the web server(s) be used etc, etc.
    See http://java.sun.com/j2ee/blueprints/apmTOC.html Specifically chapters 9.2 and 9.3 for getting some kind of orientation towards web application security.

  • One primary site with a remote DP/MP, or two with a CAS server?

    Hi
    For a new SCCM 2012 environment, we have the following setup:
    - HQ site with 1500 PCs/users
    - Branch office in a separate AD site, slow WAN link, 120 PCs/users
    Now, I'd like to keep the setup simple so my first instinct is to deploy one primary site with a server in the branch office fulfilling the MP/DP/PXE/Update Point roles.
    However, the site has a local technician who needs the ability to deploy images to the local machines. Running the console from the branch office to the HQ site is not an option, since consoles (such as ADUC) have very poor performance over the WAN.
    This brings me to the option of either a primary HQ site with a branch secondary site (something I'd like to stay away from, since it requires SQL and the technician would still need to connect the console to the primary site anyway!), or 2 primary sites both
    connected by a CAS server. For what the technician needs, I think this is overkill, and I don't like the idea of the added complexity, or keeping both sites in-step as far as replication is concerned.
    Im leaning towards the 1 primary site, remote MP/DP option, but Im not sure how the technician would image machines without the console. I thought perhaps creating an optional advertisement to a dynamic collection that he could control another way (e.g.
    using a registry key), giving him the option to trigger deployments.
    Thoughts?

    Having a local DP will ensure that all deployments are made locally if the content is distributed.
    You'll have to get your content there first, if possible build your DP in your main office and ship it to the remote location after. Otherwise use prestage content. Getting GB of stuff throught that link will otherwise take days.
    For your deployment, why does the technician need access to the console  ? Could you deploy to "unknown computers" ?
    Benoit Lecours | Blog: System Center Dudes

  • How do I get connected to a server on my network via an IP address?  When I try to open in a URL and login as a registered user with proper login it errors out saying there was a problem with connecting to the server?

    I am new to Mac...How do I get connected to a server on my network via a hyper link IP address path?  When I try to open in a URL and login as a registered user with proper login it errors out saying there was a problem with connecting to the server?

    Some of the following is going to use some technical terms — this area is inherently somewhat technical. 
    If you don't understand some part of the following reply, please ask.
    Is this your own OS X Server system on your own network, or is this some other server within some larger organization? 
    You're posting this in the OS X Server forum, which is a software package that allows OS X systems to provide web-based and many other services; to become servers.
    If it's your OS X Server on your network, then the network and DNS configurations are suspect, or the server is somehow malfunctioning or misconfigured.   This is unfortunately fairly common, as some folks do try to avoid setting up DNS services.
    If it's a larger organization and somebody else is managing the server and the network, then you'll probably need to contact the IT folks for assistance; to learn the network setup and DNS requirements, and if there's a problem with the server itself.
    The basic web URL "hyper link IP address path" — without using DNS — usually looks something the following, where you'll need to replace 10.20.30.40 with the IP address of your server:
    http://10.20.30.40
    UptimeJeff has posted a URL that specifies the AFP file system; an OS X file share.  That's used if you're connecting to an Apple storage service somewhere on your network.  You might alternatively need to specify smb://10.20.30.40 or such, if it's a Windows file server.  (There can be additional requirements for connecting to Windows Server systems, too.)
    If there's local IT staff available here, please contact them for assistance.  If these are your own local systems and your own local OS X Server system, then some information on the server will be needed.  (If you're on a NAT'd network, you'll also need to get DNS services configured and working on your local OS X Server system and your network — you'll not be able to skip this step and reference ISP DNS servers here — or things can and usually will get weird.)

  • HT204416 My Safari is no longer working with many sites.  However Chrome and Firefox work fine.  I would like to re-install Safari in an effort to clear up the problem I can not resolve.

    My Safari is no longer working with many sites.  However Chrome and Firefox work fine.  I would like to re-install Safari in an effort to clear up the problem I can not resolve.

    1. From the Safari menu bar, select
              Safari ▹ Preferences... ▹ Extensions
    Turn all extensions OFF and test. If the problem is resolved, turn extensions back ON and then disable them one or a few at a time until you find the culprit.
    2. Select
              Safari ▹ Preferences... ▹ Privacy ▹ Remove All Website Data...
    and confirm. Test.
    3. If the above steps don't resolve the problem, please describe it in more detail.

  • Public SharePoint Online Site with External User Portal

    Hello Everyone,<o:p></o:p>
    My company switched over to Office 365 a few months ago, and now would like to start using our Public SharePoint site to share information (documents
    pertaining to their orders/drawings/etc.) with our customers (external users).<o:p></o:p>
    <o:p> </o:p>
    I have seen documentation on how to share documents with individual users, but we were looking to do something a little bit different. We would ultimately
    like to have a public site with generic company information (like hours, about us,directions etc.) that anyone can see.
    We would also like to use SharePoint as almost an "FTP type" service where we could post documents and share them with individual
    external
    users. HOWEVER, instead of sharing individual documents, we were wondering if there was a way that an external user (that we have granted
    access) could sign into the public SharePoint site, and then see information that ONLY pertains to them.
    I have been doing some research on this, and I haven't seen that anyone else has tried this. Has anyone had any luck? Or would you have suggestions on how to make
    this work? I had originally posted this question on the Office 365 SharePoint forum, and they suggested posting this question here. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!

    Hi,
    did you finally manage to get what you requested here above ? Indeed, I am also struggling to set up the same (public website with individual content sharing with external authentified user).
    For external user, I am quite sure that we need to go through MS ID creation (I have created some test users using https://login.live.com).
    Our public website is done and (almost) working. I have then created a sub-site for the same, this one to manage permission based on authentified user
    But I am stuck when trying to assign a document library with relavant permission.
    Would be great to share our feedback and I have searched a lto on the web and did not find any satisfying answer to this design (If there is any... here is my doubt...)
    Thanks in advance
    stef

  • Safari 5.1 now is garbled with many of the sites having lines on top of each other. Is any one else having that issue? If so, how did you resolve it? Thanks in advance for any help.

    Safari 5.1 now is garbled with many of the sites having lines on top of each other. Is any one else having that issue? If so, how did you resolve it? Thanks in advance for any help.

    "Did you make the .psd file with a transparent background (checkerboard) in Photoshop? And when you placed it in AI did you choose the top option Convert Photoshop Layers to Objects?"
    Yep, and it still didn't work.
    But I figured what I did wrong: I was selecting both the text and the heart, and then I was doing the whole Object>Wrap Text>Make thing, as opposed to just selecting the heart and doing it. Once I did it, I moved the heart around on top of the text, and it "made room" for the pic, wrapping itself around the heart.
    Thanks so much, and thanks A MILLION for being so patient.
    Jeez, when can I get some textbook to learn all the intricacies of Illustrator?

  • I am registered user of Phtoshop CC but when i installed and signed in with my credentials its shows as an trial version

    I am registered user of Phtoshop CC but when i installed and signed in with my credentials its shows as an trial version.My ID [email protected] is subscribed for the product Photoshop CC by Creative Cloud for teams (one year membership) Capgemini India Pvt Ltd, so i downloaded and installed the photoshop CC but its installed as an 30 days trial version. Please guide me to get my full ersion

    Sign in, activation, or connection errors | CS5.5 and later
    Mylenium

  • Lync edge server for site with 2500 users

    Dear All,
    I have a question with regards to the implementation of lync edge server deployment.
    One of our client having lync deployment with 4000 users in a central site with 3 FE EE and  edge pool with 2 Edge servers, there are planning for a new site with 2500 users.
    what will be the best method for the site implementation , shall we deploy a SE Fe server and all the external communication through the Central site Edge server?
    or is it required to have a separate pool for site?
    please help me 

    Agree with the others.  So, there's two questions, "what will be the best method for the site implementation?" and "is it required to have a separate pool for site?".
    The best method I'd suggest is use Enterprise Edition Lync so you can perform pool pairing for resiliency, and have a local edge pool as the others suggested.  You have enough users to support this, and with growth you might want to be able to scale
    up anyway.
    Is it required? Not at all.  You can send them all through the central site edge server, it's possible and fully supported.    It's up to you, but I'd suggest the separate pool.
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
    SWC Unified Communications

  • Register APs at remote site with WLCs at the core via Metro E.

    All,
    I have problem with register APs at the remote site with WLCs at the core.
    All of my WLCs are on main site; and the majority of APs are on same subnet and same site with the WLCs. This works just fine.
    However I have a remote site with connected to the core via metro E. And I am unable to make the APs at this site register to the controllers at the core.
    On remote site APs and PCs are on subnet. And PCs are work just fine. I have the DHCP scope options 43 set for the ip address of the WLCs.
    Metro E interfaces are on 192.168.0.0 /24.
    Clients (PCs and APs) at remote are on 192.168.56.0 /24
    I have the configuration on the Metro E and and remote site on the attachment.
    Thank in advantage.

    To get APs registered, make sure AP is getting an ip address and can ping WLC
    Once this is verified, run the following debugs on WLC CLI and attach it to the thread:
    - debug mac addr
    - debug capwap OR lwapp events enable
    - debug capwap OR lwapp errors enable
    - debug pm pki enable
    To stop debug
    - debug  disable-all
    In case you have 'console' access to remote site AP, capture AP boot up and then run "debug ip udp" on AP CLI
    To stop this debug
    AP# undebug all

  • Permissions problem with Connect To Server as Registered User

    On a Mac running the latest Lion, I'm using Finder's "Connect To Server" feature to connect to another Mac (which is running Snow Leopard) as a Registered User.   When I then try to save documents to a location on that other Mac, (for example, from TextEdit), I get errors like "The document "Untititled" could not be saved as "TestFromOtherComputer.rtf".  You don't have permission.    To view or change permissions, select the item in the Finder and choose File > Get Info."
    When I connect as a Registered User, don't I then have all of the permsissions of that user?    In the above case, "that user" absolutely has the permissions to save a file (to the folder I've chosen or elsewhere).    So what gives?
    Thanks in advance.

    I actually just tried something different, and may have found a bug.
    For clarity, I have an iMac and an Macbook Pro.   The Macbook is visible to the iMac in the "Shared" section of the FInder on the iMac and I connected to it using "Connect As" / "Registered User".
    When I try to save a file from TextEdit to the Macbook (with the filename 'SavedFromiMac'), I'm able to navigate through all of the folders as expected, but when I click "Save", the file DOES save in the Macbook's folder, BUT I get an error from TextEdit saying it could not be saved because I don't have permission (worded as I describe in the previous post).
    Going to the Macbook, if I double-click on the saved file, I get an error message that says "The document 'SavedFromiMac.rtf' could not be opened."
    The Macbook is running 10.6.8, Build 10K549 and the iMac is 10.7.2, build 11C74.
    Does anyone have any thoughts what's going on?

  • Hi everyone, to use the portal with many users using the same portal user?

    I have an another question is possible to use the portal with many users using the same portal user with diferent roles in the same time?
    thanks

    Hi Israel,
    It is possible to have same user logged in through differnt terminals or browser windows. However if there are say 10 roles assigned to that user, all 10 will be visible in all the windows. However you may open and work on different roles.. in the different windows.
    Note that the real time collaboration features shall not be available if the same user logs in multiple times.
    Hope this is useful.
    Regards,
    Anagha

Maybe you are looking for