Missing inverse index on remove?

When pre-loading a cache with data I get the following text on the storage nodes. What is likely to be wrong with my cluster/configuration? As far as I know I am using the latest 3.5 release (I know there weresome problem causing a similar message to be printed in an earlier release).
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A09C8A0101419C877E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A09C8A0101419C877E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A09C8A0101419C877E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x1584590000419AFF89010141B9A47E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x1584590000419AFF89010141B9A47E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.706/44.999 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x1584590000419AFF89010141B9A47E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.722/45.015 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A2998A010141988E7E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.722/45.015 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A2998A010141988E7E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.722/45.015 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:0, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041A2998A010141988E7E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.847/45.140 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004195EF89010141B2817E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.847/45.140 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004195EF89010141B2817E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.847/45.140 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004195EF89010141B2817E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004184F7890101419A957E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004184F7890101419A957E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x15845900004184F7890101419A957E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041BA848A01014193897E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041BA848A01014193897E40)
2009-08-04 12:46:21.878/45.171 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5/459 <Info> (thread=PartitionedOffHeapWorker:1, member=1): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=16, value=0x158459000041BA848A01014193897E40)
/Magnus

It seemed like I have specified a to low max size on my back cache causing loaded objects to be evicted. Not sure why that caused this info message though...
/Magnus

Similar Messages

Missing inverse index on remove: value=null

When upgrading from Coherence 3.4 to 3.5 and during our test runs we see this in the log ..
+12:56:39,241 INFO Coherence:3 - 2010-02-23 12:56:39.241 Oracle Coherence GE 3.5.3/465 <Info> (thread=dist-tradeobject-serviceWorker:1, member=17): Missing inverse index on remove: value=null, key=Binary(length=102, value=0x0DA20515AE0F00014E2C3130303232333A545955533A4275793A4571753A4D3A43534642444D413A5553443A5553443A435346423A30034E2C3130303232333A545955533A4275793A4571753A4D3A43534642444D413A5553443A5553443A435346423A3040)+
above lines are repeated multiple times for multiple objects. Not sure what prompts this info message outcome..
Can you please give me some pointers
Thanks

Hello,
Sorry for the delay in responding. This does appear to be an issue which can be reproduced. There is an open issue number (COH-3055) assigned for tracking purposes. Thank you for reporting this problem.
Dave

What does "Missing reverse index on remove: value=null" mean

I am getting this error in my Coherence Debug Logs, what does this error mean ?
Thanks
14:46:24,923 WARN Coherence:3 - 2009-05-06 14:46:24.923 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4/405p1 <Warning> (thread=dist-customer-serviceWorker:1, member=25): Missing reverse index on remove: value=null,
key=Binary(length=102, value=0x0DB53915AADDGFDF...etc

I am still seeing this message (but as a info message) in 3.6.0.1. The test case is a single cache node and a single "client" that is inserting a lot of data. I have like 6 indexes defined (all using POF extractors). One index contains an array of a user type, the others primitive types. One index is sorted the rest not.
Imho the condition causing this should be fixed or, if this is not causing any problems, performance or otherwise, the message be removed - pperation should be undisturbed by messages that has no meaning to the user!
2010-08-19 08:42:57.718/50.860 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=432}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DB30315A33E000041BC010141A5CC0140)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.718/50.860 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=1117}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DB40315A33E0000419B140141A4C40140)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.718/50.860 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=3194}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DB50315A33E0000419D2E0141A7CC0140)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.734/50.876 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=542}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DB90315A33E00004192450141BC900240)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.734/50.876 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=4042}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DBB0315A33E000041940A01419C890340)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.734/50.876 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=4733}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DBC0315A33E000041BC1D014191D90240)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.734/50.876 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=1632}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0DBE0315A33E000041B43E0141B1D00140)
2010-08-19 08:42:57.749/50.891 Oracle Coherence GE 3.6.0.1 <Info> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Missing inverse index: value=ObjKey{typeId=0, instanceId=2490}, key=Binary(length=17, value=0x0D800415A33E00004196310141BEFC0140)
/Magnus

Seeing: 'Missing reverse index on remove: null' errors

Hi,
I'm seeing the following error being logged on a couple of our cache servers:
2007-05-15 16:03:10.799 Tangosol Coherence AE 3.2.2/371 <Error> (thread=DistributedCacheWorker:3, member=2): Missing reverse index on remove: null
I've not found any posts on the forum related to this and I'm not sure how to go about investigating it.
Can you let me know what this error means and where to look for possible causes?
Let me know if I can provide any more information.
Thanks,
Randal.

Randal,
This is an internal (debug) message that should have been logged at a higher log level and usually could be safely ignored. If you'd like, you could send the corresponding log files to support at tangosol.com for a full analysis.
Regards,
Gene

Pages file is missing its index.xml file?

all the "pages" files which i have created on my computer recently are saying that they have the file is missing its "index.xml"
im freaking out because i have two uni assignemnts due and both files aren't opeing!
help!
i have opened the content of the file.. and all other places are telling me there should be a file called index.zip, in there and to rename it as .pages or to copy off and re open it, or to rename it as zip.xml and try again...
nothing is working

You have 2 versions of Pages on your Mac.
Pages 5 is in your Applications folder.
Pages '09/'08 is in your Applications/iWork folder.
You are alternately opening the wrong versions.
Pages '09/'08 can not open Pages 5 files and you will get the warning that you need a newer version.
Pages 5/5.01 can not open Pages 5.1 files and you will get the warning that you need a newer version.
Pages 5.1 sometimes can not open its own files and you will get the warning that you need a newer version.
Pages 5 can open Pages '09 files but may damage/alter them. It can not open Pages '08 files at all.
Once opened and saved in Pages 5 the Pages '09 files can not be opened in Pages '09.
Anything that is saved to iCloud is also converted to Pages 5 files.
All Pages files no matter what version and incompatibility have the same extension .pages.
Pages 5 files are now only compatible with themselves on a very restricted set of hardware, software and Operating Systems and will not transfer correctly on any other server software than iCloud.
Apple has not only managed to confuse all its users, but also itself.
Note: Apple has removed over 100 features from Pages 5 and added many bugs:
http://www.freeforum101.com/iworktipsntrick/viewforum.php?f=22&sid=3527487677f0c 6fa05b6297cd00f8eb9&mforum=iworktipsntrick
Archive/trash Pages 5, after exporting all Pages 5 files to Pages '09 or Word .docx, and rate/review it in the App Store, then get back to work.
Peter

How do you open a Numbers file sent from another Mac user with same operating system, i get a pop up that says I'm missing an index.hml file??? HELP PLEASE

how do you open a Numbers file sent from another Mac user with same operating system, i get a pop up that says I'm missing an index.hml file??? HELP PLEASE

The operating system may be the same but the Numbers applications are likely different. You need to get the apps in sync. Unfortunately, the Numbers (and Pages as well) saga is pretty confusing (and frustrating). Here's some info from the iWork resident version expert (PeterBreis0807):
Pages '09/'08 can not open Pages 5 files and you will get the warning that you need a newer version.
Pages 5.2 can open Pages '09 files but may damage/alter them. It can not open Pages '08 files at all.
Older versions of Pages 5 can not open files from later versions of Pages 5.
Once opened and saved in Pages 5 the Pages '09 files can not be opened in Pages '09.
Anything that is saved to iCloud and opened in a newer version of Pages is also converted to Pages 5 files.
All Pages files no matter what version and incompatibility have the same extension .pages.
Pages 5 files are now only compatible with themselves on a very restricted set of hardware, software and Operating Systems and will not transfer correctly on any other server software than iCloud.
Apple has removed almost 100 features from Pages 5 and added many bugs.

Missing primary index

Hi All
In db02 under diagnostics we can see the missing table and indexes. I just want to know the which backend program actually triggers or from which tables is referring to finds out the missing primary indexes in database and particulary shows which object has an inconsistency of it.
Thanks
Siva

Hi All
In db02 under diagnostics we can see the missing table and indexes. I just want to know the which backend program actually triggers or from which tables is referring to finds out the missing primary indexes in database and particulary shows which object has an inconsistency of it.
Thanks
Siva

Reoccuring missing secondary indexes in BI systems

Hi Gurus,
I'm been experiencing the problem of missing secondary indexes for some time, and I would like to get to the bottom of this problem.
These are a few of the missing indexes (from DB02):-
/BIC/F100294-900
/BIC/F100365-900
/BIC/F100366-900
/BIC/F100368-900
/BIC/F100369-900
/BIC/F100386-900
/BIC/FZCFIGRLP-900
/BIC/FZCGLECRD-900
/BIC/FZCGLECRD2-900
/BIC/FZCGLECRD3-900
TSP03-1
TSP03L-A
Any idea what could be causing this???
And how do I solve this problem??? And how can I prevent these from reoccuring again???
Thanks.
Cheers,
KeatSeong

I see missing indexes on DB02 as well and ran SAP_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPAIR and I just have a couple more questions that I think is relevant to this chain:
1) It repaired some fact indexes like /BIC/F* and dimension indexes like /BIC/D* but in the report showed as follows for those cubes:
0 ZPP_C008 : 0 secondary indexes repaired.
2) I had some other dimension indexes like /BIC/D* that did not get repaired and I'm wondering why. See 4) below for how I repaired those.
3) I ran RSRV and these missing indexes like /BIC/D* do not show up as being an issue
4) When I run RSDU_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPAIR on that missing index like /BIC/D* I get E_REPAIRED = 0 and system error: RSDU_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPA_ORA but when I refresh DB02 the index is gone. When I go to RSDU_INFOCUBE_INDEXES_REPA_ORA and run it I got e_reparied - 11
Thanks for all your help.
Mike
Edited by: Michael Hill on May 26, 2010 6:49 PM

Missing secondary indexes

Hello Gurus,
Hope you are doing good ! I have few missing secondary indexes. I have corrected them in rsrv with the correct error option but still most of them seem to be back in DB02. Warnings have occured for few cubes being : Oracle:Index/BI0/SDOC_NUMBER~0 has possible degenareted.
I checked in the process chains but the indexes are successfully built. Any sugestions pls let me know.
Kind Regards,
Sunitha

Hi Sunitha,
Try checking these indices from cube/DSO Performance tab and try with the repair option available there.
Sometimes, it might be possible to the tablespace problem to build the indices. Check those too also from DB02.
Regards,
Srinivas.

Missing one Index.dbf

Hello all,
After a database crash, I found that the backup has miss a index dbf file. Can I start the database without the missing index dbf file
Thank !!!

I believe I need to clarify my previous post in an effort to be more complete.
If there was only one datafile in the tablespace:
startup mount;
alter database datafile 'ddddd.dbf' offline drop; (only in non-archivelog log mode)
alter database open;
drop tablespace index including contents;
or if there was more than one:
startup mount;
alter database create datafile 'aaaa.dbf' as 'aaaa.dbf';
alter database open;
You will have to do media recovery on the new file to return it to the state of the old file at the time it was lost.
shutdown and startup. Check the alert log for errors.

Missing Database Index Production Server

Hi,
We are getting Missing Database Index ZPP_EXCAVAT_DET5~0 in production server. For missing database index we are getting in se14 it is showing Exists in the database.While we are using t -code in Db02 there we are getting
ZPP_EXCAVAT_DET5~0 u2013 missing database index.
Had Followd as per note 1248769 but not working Please Suggest
Regards
Priyanka M Jain.

Dear Vinod,
Tried Following Steps as
. Call transaction SE14.
. Enter the name of the table and choose "Edit".
. Choose "Indexes".
. Select the index and choose "Choose (F2)".
. If you choose "Activate and adjust", the system creates the index again and it is consistent.
. Check the object log of this activation.
. If an error occurs, eliminate the cause and reactivate the index.
But could not create the index
Following Error Occured
SQL STATEMENT COULD NOT BE EXECUTED
INDEX COULD NOT BE CREATED COMPLETELY IN THE DATABASE
INDEX ZPP_EXCAVET_DET5-0 Could NOT BE CREATED

Help, am I missing an index page?

Hey everyone,
I just created a site, very simple splash page for one of my bands, with rollover image buttons to forward the public off to other websites.
I've connected to my site via FTP, using CS4 to upload all the files in my site's home folder on my computer.
However when I go to my URL in my browser, I get a page not found notice..I spoke with the company that I bought the domain off of, and a rep said that I am missing the index file on the server, I guess he means the script to make sense of all the buttons that i created.
my templates folder is on the server, with my 'splashpage.dwt' and 'splashpage.htm' files both there. I guess these are not the appropriate files for the webpage to run??
Does anyone know what file I need to create, and upload to my domain's file manager in order to get my site to appear??
any help is greatly appreciated.
thanks,
Mark.

There's no reason whatsoever to have your Template folder on the server unless you would want to share the files with someone. The *.dwt files have NO effect at the server level. THey only mean something to Dreamweaver and can only affect local files.
Further, please take a look in your child page (splashpage.htm) and see if you see any markup in Code view that looks like this -
<!-- TemplateBeginEditable
If you do then you are not using templates properly and will experience failures soon.

Way to find Missing table Index in SAP ?

Hi All,
Is there any way to check missing tables index in SAP?
and also DB size ? and reorganize the index and tables?
Cheers
Usman

Hi Usman,
Transaction SE14, DB02 .. program to reorganize the index and tables .. Report RSSDBREO 
Db Size :Tr.DB02 Perform DB Check and you will get the size.
Or you can check on your database server sap data files systems. so you will know gross size of your DB.
Thanks
Saquib Khan
Message was edited by: Saquib Khan

PPS Tuning Advisory – Missing OOTB Index On s_audit_item In 8.x

Hi All,
We have had to add this missing OOTB index at several of our accounts so I wanted to pass this along. It is missing on deletes such as deleting of quotes.
-- azgpf8ju1yj6s
ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_MODE = FIRST_ROWS_10 ;
ALTER SESSION SET "_OPTIMIZER_SORTMERGE_JOIN_ENABLED" = FALSE ;
ALTER SESSION SET "_OPTIMIZER_JOIN_SEL_SANITY_CHECK" = TRUE;
ALTER SESSION SET "_HASH_JOIN_ENABLED" = FALSE;
DELETE FROM SIEBEL.S_QUOTE_ITM_SPA WHERE ROW_ID IN
(SELECT TBL_RECORD_ID FROM SIEBEL.S_AUDIT_ITEM WHERE GROUP_NUM = :B1)
DROP INDEX SIEBEL.S_AUDIT_ITEM_CUSTOM01_X;
CREATE INDEX SIEBEL.S_AUDIT_ITEM_CUSTOM01_X ON SIEBEL.S_AUDIT_ITEM
GROUP_NUM
NOLOGGING
TABLESPACE SIEBEL1D
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE (
INITIAL 8M
NEXT 8M
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED
PCTINCREASE 0
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT
PARALLEL 6;
alter INDEX SIEBEL.S_AUDIT_ITEM_CUSTOM01_X
NOPARALLEL
LOGGING
begin
DBMS_STATS.GATHER_INDEX_STATS(
ownname => 'SIEBEL',
indname => 'S_AUDIT_ITEM_CUSTOM01_X',
estimate_percent => 100,
degree => DBMS_STATS.AUTO_DEGREE
end;
Robert Ponder
Lead Architect and Director
Ponder Pro Serve
cell: 770.490.2767
fax: 770.412.8259
email: [email protected]
web: www.ponderproserve.com
Edited by: Robert Ponder on Sep 13, 2010 7:18 PM

Hi,
it's a known issue (at least for me :)). DBMS_LOB is a special interface used by clients to operate with LOBs. When it is used to manipulate with LOB data, SQL engine is bypassed (OK, it's my speculation about that - actually it can't be bypassed), which results in accounting wait events to non-existent cursor (not parsed & executed) in the 10046 trace. Usually it's the first "available" cursor number in trace (I haven't seen another behavior). TKPROF will show all waits accounted for DBMS_LOB activities to OVERALL section, OraSRP would show it under 'unaccaunted for' section.
So that's the first part: DBMS_LOB actions are not accounted to a particular cursor in the trace.
There's second thing to remember: [direct path write|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/waitevents.htm#sthref3038]
During Direct Path operations, the data is asynchronously written to the database filesand [direct path write and direct path write temp|http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14211/instance_tune.htm#i16292]
Like direct path reads, the number of waits is not the same as number of write calls issued if the I/O subsystem supports asynchronous writes
it means that the time for direct path operations is not real wall-clock time, it's just a time to submit an IO request if IO subsystem supports asynchronous IO. And that's explains "lost" wait time.
Also, parameters to that events are:
P1 - File_id for the write call
P2 - Start block_id for the write call
P3 - Number of blocks in the write callso P2 is not object id, nor data object id. Usually such cases are identified based on the number of 'direct path' events and looking at the raw trace file.

I received a Pages attachment in email, but I can't open it. Says it's missing an "index.mlx" -- any idea what that is and how I can open the file?

Received a Pages attachment in email, but can't open it. Error message says it's missing an "index.mlx" -- any idea what that is and how I can open the file?

Many thanks ... after many trials and effort, the sender admitted he doesn't know what he did - he's new to Apple - so guess he'll have to get some training!

Missing inverse index on remove?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for