MIX sale return problem(query not giving required result)

i have written following query which is running sucessfully.the concept behind this query is to get a exact quantity of sold items after subtracting the sale return from the sale.now the problem is that when user take sale return against invoice then this query providing ok result but when user take sale return against MIX items not knowing exactly the invoice then query is not showing result means not subtracting MIX sale from sale.please help me to get required result from this query.
i m using oracle 9i with developer 6i
select s.price,s.item_code,S.DESCR,
sum(decode(d.MONno,01,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) JAN,
sum(decode(d.MONno,02,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) FEB,
sum(decode(d.MONno,03,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) MAR,
sum(decode(d.MONno,04,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) APR,
sum(decode(d.MONno,05,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) MAY,
sum(decode(d.MONno,06,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) JUN,
sum(decode(d.MONno,07,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) JULY,
sum(decode(d.MONno,08,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) AUG,
sum(decode(d.MONno,09,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) SEP,
sum(decode(d.MONno,10,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) OCT,
sum(decode(d.MONno,11,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) NOV,
sum(decode(d.MONno,12,NVL(S.QTY,0),0)) DEC,
sum(S.qty) TU
FROM
(select nvl(sales_detail.qty,0)+NVL(sales_detail.bonus,0) as qty,
sales_detail.item_code AS ITEM_CODE,stock_reg.price price,
stock_reg.descr AS descr,
s_date as sale_date FROM
SALES_DETAIL,SALES_HEADER,STOCK_REG
WHERE SALES_DETAIL.S_ID = SALES_HEADER.S_ID AND
SALES_DETAIL.STOCKCODE = STOCK_REG.STOCKCODE AND
STOCK_REG.COMCODE=:COM AND
STOCK_REG.GROUPID = :GID
UNION ALL
SELECT -1*QTY,ITEM_CODE,PRICE,DESCR,SALE_DATE FROM
(select nvl(sales_detailR.qty,0)+NVL(sales_detailR.bonus,0) as qty,
sales_detailR.item_code AS ITEM_CODE,stock_reg.price as price,
stock_reg.descr AS descr,
RETURN_date as sale_date FROM
SALES_DETAILR,SALES_HEADERR,STOCK_REG
WHERE SALES_DETAILR.SR_ID = SALES_HEADERR.SR_ID AND
SALES_DETAILR.STOCKCODE = STOCK_REG.STOCKCODE AND
STOCK_REG.COMCODE=:COM AND
STOCK_REG.GROUPID = :GID
UNION ALL
select -1nvl(sales_detailR.qty,0)+NVL(sales_detailR.bonus,0) as qty,*
sales_detailR.item_code AS ITEM_CODE,stock_reg.price as price,
stock_reg.descr AS descr,
RETURN_date as sale_date FROM
SALES_DETAILR,SALES_HEADERR,STOCK_REG
WHERE SALES_DETAILR.SR_ID = SALES_HEADERR.SR_ID AND
SALES_DETAILR.STOCKCODE = STOCK_REG.STOCKCODE AND
SALES_HEADERR.S_ID = 'MIX' AND
STOCK_REG.COMCODE=:COM AND
STOCK_REG.GROUPID = :GID)) S,
(select level as MONno
from dual
connect by level <= 12) d
where d.MONno = to_char(s.sALE_date, 'MM') AND trunc(S.SALE_DATE,'MONTH') BETWEEN TO_DATE(:FDATE,'MMYY') AND TO_DATE(:TDATE,'MMYY')
GROUP BY S.ITEM_CODE,S.DESCR,S.PRICE
ORDER BY S.DESCR ASC

Gaurav,
Can you print all the binding variables and update the ouput here.
And I didn't get this date format 'dd-mon-rrrr', normally it will be like 'dd-mon-yyyy' right?
Thanks,
With regards,m
Kali.
OSSI.

Similar Messages

Group by Query not giving desired results

Hi,
I've a requirement to find minimum month based on status:
The following query is giving error :
SELECT
          b.app_name,
          DECODE (a.status,
          'C','Closed',
          'O','Open',
          'F','Future',
          'W','Pending',
          'N','Not Opened') decode_status
          MIN(a.period_name)
FROM     table a,
     table b
WHERE     a.app_id     =     b.app_id
AND          b.app_name      =     'NAME1'
AND          a.book_id     =     &book_id
AND          a.status      =      'O'
GROUP BY      b.app_name,
          DECODE (a.status,
          'C','Closed',
          'O','Open',
          'F','Future',
          'W','Pending',
          'N','Not Opened') decode_status
for ex: in the above query if I've four records with status 'O' and period_name as 'May-12', 'Jun-12','Jul-12' ,'Aug-12' then I need to pick 'May'
Thanks,
Kiran

Hi, Kiran,
user518071 wrote:
Hi,
I've a requirement to find minimum month based on status:
The following query is giving error :
SELECT
          b.app_name,
          DECODE (a.status,
          'C','Closed',
          'O','Open',
          'F','Future',
          'W','Pending',
          'N','Not Opened') decode_status
          MIN(a.period_name)
FROM     table a,
     table b
WHERE     a.app_id     =     b.app_id
AND          b.app_name      =     'NAME1'
AND          a.book_id     =     &book_id
AND          a.status      =      'O'
GROUP BY      b.app_name,
          DECODE (a.status,
          'C','Closed',
          'O','Open',
          'F','Future',
          'W','Pending',
          'N','Not Opened') decode_status
for ex: in the above query if I've four records with status 'O' and period_name as 'May-12', 'Jun-12','Jul-12' ,'Aug-12' then I need to pick 'May'
Thanks,
KiranIt looks like you're almost there.
If period_name is a DATE, then
MIN (a.period_name)is finidng the earliest period name, such as 5 May 2012 17:03:49. If you just want to see 'May 2012', then change that to
TO_CHAR ( MIN (a.period_name)
        , 'Mon YYYY'
        )If a.period_name is a VARCHAR2, then change it to a DATE. The best way to do this is permanently. There is no reason to store date information in VARCHAR2 columns. Oracle supplies DATE columns; there's no extra cost for using them. DATE columns were designed for storing date information, use them to do that.
if you must keep your date information in VARCHAR2 a column, then use TO_DATE in the query. It will be slow, and you'll have run-time errors if any of the information is in the wrong format. That's what happens when you store date information in VARCHAR2 columns.
I hope this answers your question.
If not, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) for all tables involved, and also post the results you want from that data.
Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using.
See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}

Query not giving any result

SQL> set long 2000
SQL> select * from v$version;
select username from dba_users where username like '%KRO%';
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Productio
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
SQL>
USERNAME
SUPRKRON
KRONREAD
SQL>
select sum(bytes/1024/1024/1024) from dba_segments where owner='SUPRKRON'SQL> ;
SUM(BYTES/1024/1024/1024)
3.62319946
SQL> select sum(bytes/1024/1024/1024) from dba_segments where owner='KRONREAD';
SUM(BYTES/1024/1024/1024)
-------------------------

user11919409 wrote:
SQL> set long 2000
SQL> select * from v$version;
select username from dba_users where username like '%KRO%';
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Productio
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
SQL>
USERNAME
SUPRKRON
KRONREAD
SQL>
select sum(bytes/1024/1024/1024) from dba_segments where owner='SUPRKRON'SQL> ;
SUM(BYTES/1024/1024/1024)
3.62319946
SQL> select sum(bytes/1024/1024/1024) from dba_segments where owner='KRONREAD';
SUM(BYTES/1024/1024/1024)
-------------------------OK, KRONREAD does not own any objects.
a READONLY schema?

Query not giving the correct result

select Project_id, contractno
from elf_transactions
where(rtrim(contractno),rtrim(project_id)) not in
(select rtrim(contractno),rtrim(projectid)
from contract_proj
where report_month='1-May-2007' )
when I m firing this query, it is not giving correct result to me, it also select the recorts which are matches in both the table
i want to fine out those contract, with projectid which are not in contract_proj table
Please help me in this regard

CREATE TABLE ELF_TRANSACTIONS
VENDOR_ORDER_REF VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
BT_SUB_CON_REF VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
PR_NO VARCHAR2(15 BYTE),
PO_NO VARCHAR2(15 BYTE),
PR_PO_DESCR VARCHAR2(200 BYTE),
ONE_IT_PROG VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
BT_DEL_MANAGER_NAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
DELIVERY_TYPE VARCHAR2(5 BYTE),
ACTUAL_DEP_DATE DATE,
ASSOC_ASG_BR_QUE VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
PRE_AVG_P1_P2_INC_CNT NUMBER(3),
POST_P1_P2_INC NUMBER(3),
PERC_GROWTH_POST_REL NUMBER(3),
VENDOR_DEL_MANAGER VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
REPORT_MONTH DATE,
COMMENTS VARCHAR2(200 BYTE),
PROJECT_ID VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
CONTRACTNO VARCHAR2(15 BYTE),
CONTRACT_TYPE NVARCHAR2(15),
IDUNO VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
STATUS VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
DESCRIPTIONCODEDELIVERABLE VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
UNIQUEID VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
LOCK_RECORD CHAR(1 BYTE),
VERIFIED CHAR(1 BYTE),
VERIFIED_BY VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
BT_VERIFIED CHAR(1 BYTE),
BT_VERIFIED_BY VARCHAR2(40 BYTE)
CREATE TABLE CONTRACT_PROJ
CONTRACTNO VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
PROJECTID VARCHAR2(20 BYTE),
IDUNO VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
CH_EMPID VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
CHNAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
GH_EMPID VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
GHNAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
PM_EMPID VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
PMNAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
SPM_EMPID VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
SPMNAME VARCHAR2(40 BYTE),
PRJ_MONTH DATE,
BT_CONTRACT CHAR(1 BYTE)
REPORT_MONTH     COMMENTS     PROJECT_ID     CONTRACTNO     CONTRACT_TYPE     IDUNO     STATUS     DESCRIPTIONCODEDELIVERABLE     UNIQUEID
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1287     TML007452               OPEN     Delivery of CRs DM CD and NSI     N/A
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1280     TML007452               OPEN     Delivery of CRs H&W OOR and WLTO     N/A
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1231     TML007452               OPEN     Delivery of CRs H&W OOR WLTO
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1097     TML007679               OPEN     High Level Roadmap for Global Services and Wholesale with Feasibility study into BTR access to Switc     N/A
06/01/2007 00:00:00          405     TML007942               OPEN     RTRCC DEVELOPMENT -Q107
06/01/2007 00:00:00          405     TML007919               OPEN     WLR3 DEVELOPMENT-Q107
06/01/2007 00:00:00          1170     TML008439               OPEN     R-510
CONTRACTNO     PROJECTID     IDUNO     CH_EMPID     CHNAME     GH_EMPID     GHNAME     PM_EMPID     PMNAME     SPM_EMPID     SPMNAME     PRJ_MONTH     BT_CONTRACT
MBT003060     176     BT06     8694     Soman Sameer Surendra     1054     Bhadti Shripad Shivram     1054     Bhadti Shripad Shivram     1420     Rao Darbhamulla Kameswara     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT003842     1156     BT12     19992     Kalle Ajit Ashutosh     1539     Padgaonkar Shailesh Vishwanath     13948     Khunte Milind Vasant     16426     Kulkarni Vinay     05/01/2007 00:00:00     Y
MBT004677     458     BT09     20275     Mundassery George     5044     Kamalapurkar Leena Shrinivas     12849     Dave Ajay Yogeshchandra     2017     KIRKIRE SONAL MADHUKAR     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004695     362     BT13     20276     Ghosh Sankar     2624     Avachat Jagdish Vasantrao     13592     Pal Sudipta     2624     Avachat Jagdish Vasantrao     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004826     VITRIA     BT09     20275     Mundassery George     26099     Saha Debendra Kumar     28134     Hinge Anand Sharad     12777     Karandikar Sumedh Vidyadhar     05/01/2007 00:00:00     Y
MBT004924     1027     BT03     1451     Tillu Ashirwad     15693     Devaraj Daniel G     6867     Jadhav Satyajit Ramesh     15693     Devaraj Daniel G     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004927     1025     BT05     4436     Kelkar Subhash Manohar     20379     Gore Sujeet Narayan     13704     Vignesh Chandrasekaran     4347     BIJNORI REHANA GULAMWARIS     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004927     1092     BT05     4436     Kelkar Subhash Manohar     15094     Jain Jitendra     13350     Bokil Shripad Raghunath     9511     Markande Balchandra Narayan     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N
MBT004927     1213     BT09     20275     Mundassery George     19996     Vege Sridhar     16401     Sibgathulla Mohammed     19996     Vege Sridhar     05/01/2007 00:00:00     N

SQL Query problem (Query not working as expected)

Hi guys,
Today i built a query which is something like
Select from (Select * from (TableName) Where (Condition)) ALIAS where ALIAS.columnName = (some paramerter);*
I wrote this query thinking that first inner subquery will be executed and then the WHERE clause will be applied..
But the results returned by this query are not the same as expected.
I ran the inner sub-query as a separate query and saw that results should be properly returned if Outer WHERE clause is applied on those results(returned by sub-query).
But the results being returned after executing the complete query are different..
Please help me..How could it be possible??
If it is possible..then what is the alternative approach.??
Edited by: 854509 on 13 Sep, 2011 5:54 AM

SELECT *
FROM (SELECT *
FROM emp
WHERE sal > 800) detail
WHERE detail.job = 'SALESMAN'
OUTPUT :
EMPNO     ENAME     JOB     MGR     HIREDATE     SAL     COMM     DEPTNO
7499     ALLEN     SALESMAN     7698     02/20/81     1600     300     30
7521     WARD     SALESMAN     7698     02/22/81     1250     500     30
7654     MARTIN     SALESMAN     7698     09/28/81     1250     1400     30
7844     TURNER     SALESMAN     7698     09/08/81     1500          30
REGARDS,
FRIEND

PO query not giving correct values

Hi
I am running the following query in PL?SQL Developer
SELECT hou.name Operating_unit,
       pha.segment1 po_number,
       pha.revision_num,
       ap.vendor_name,
       hla1.location_code,
       papf.full_name Buyer,
       to_char(pha.creation_date, 'DD-MON-RRRR HH24:MI:SS') creation_date,
       pdta.type_name,
       assa.vendor_site_code,
       hla2.location_code,
       initcap(pha.authorization_status) po_status,
       pha.currency_code,
       pla.line_num,
       pltt.line_type,
       msib.segment1 item,
       (mcb.segment1 || '.' || mcb.segment1) category,
       msib.description,
       msib.primary_unit_of_measure UOM,
       pla.quantity,
       pla.unit_price,
       (pla.quantity * pla.unit_price) amount,
       (gcc.segment1 || '-' || gcc.segment2 || '-' || gcc.segment3 || '-' ||
       gcc.segment4 || '-' || gcc.segment5) charge_account,
       pla.list_price_per_unit,
       at.name,
       pha.freight_terms_lookup_code,
       pha.fob_lookup_code,
       initcap(pha.pay_on_code) pay_on_code,
       pha.acceptance_required_flag,
       ood.organization_code,
       ood.organization_name,
       msib.primary_unit_of_measure UOM,
       pla.quantity,
       plla.country_of_origin_code,
       (gcc.segment1 || '-' || gcc.segment2 || '-' || gcc.segment3 || '-' ||
       gcc.segment4 || '-' || gcc.segment5) charge_account,
       (pla.quantity * pla.unit_price) amount,
       plla.receive_close_tolerance,
       plla.invoice_close_tolerance,
       plla.quantity,
       plla.quantity_received,
       plla.quantity_cancelled,
       plla.quantity_billed,
       plla.match_option,
       plla.accrue_on_receipt_flag,
       plla.enforce_ship_to_location_code,
       plla.days_early_receipt_allowed,
       plla.days_late_receipt_allowed,
       plla.receipt_days_exception_code,
       plla.qty_rcv_tolerance,
       initcap(plla.qty_rcv_exception_code),
       plla.allow_substitute_receipts_flag,
       plla.receiving_routing_id,
       plla.enforce_ship_to_location_code,
       initcap(pda.destination_type_code),
       papf.full_name requestor,
       hla3.location_code,
       --pda.quantity_ordered, -- commented because giving wrong value
       (select quantity_ordered
          from po_distributions_all
         where po_header_id IN (select po_header_id
                                  from po_headers_all
                                 where segment1 = pha.segment1)) quantity_ordered, -- Added
       (gcc.segment1 || '-' || gcc.segment2 || '-' || gcc.segment3 || '-' ||
       gcc.segment4 || '-' || gcc.segment5) po_charge_account,
       haou.name,
       prha.segment1,
       prla.line_num,
       to_char(prla.rate_date, 'DD-MON-RRRR') rate_date,
       (gcc.segment1 || '-' || gcc.segment2 || '-' || gcc.segment3 || '-' ||
       gcc.segment4 || '-' || gcc.segment5) po_charge_account,
       (SELECT acc.segment1 || '-' || acc.segment2 || '-' || acc.segment3 || '-' ||
               acc.segment4 || '-' || acc.segment5
          FROM gl_code_combinations acc
         WHERE acc.code_combination_id = pda.accrual_account_id) accrual_account,
       (SELECT acc.segment1 || '-' || acc.segment2 || '-' || acc.segment3 || '-' ||
               acc.segment4 || '-' || acc.segment5
          FROM gl_code_combinations acc
         WHERE acc.code_combination_id = pda.variance_account_id) variance_account,
       pla.line_num,
       plla.shipment_num,
       ood.organization_code,
       ood.organization_name,
       msib.segment1,
       msib.description,
       pla.quantity
FROM hr_operating_units           hou,
       po_headers_all               pha,
       ap_suppliers                 ap,
       hr_locations_all             hla1,
       per_all_people_f             papf,
       po_document_types_all        pdta,
       po_document_types_all_b      pdtab,
       ap_supplier_sites_all        assa,
       hr_locations_all             hla2,
       po_lines_all                 pla,
       po_line_types_b              pltb,
       po_line_types_tl             pltt,
       mtl_system_items_b           msib,
       po_line_locations_all        plla,
       mtl_categories_b             mcb,
       po_distributions_all         pda,
       gl_code_combinations         gcc,
       ap_terms                     at,
       org_organization_definitions ood,
       hr_locations_all             hla3,
       po_requisition_headers_all   prha,
       po_req_distributions_all     prda,
       po_requisition_lines_all     prla,
       hr_all_organization_units_tl haou
WHERE 1 = 1
   AND pha.segment1 = '6395'        --&po_number
   AND hou.organization_id = 204    --&operating_unit
   AND hou.organization_id = pha.org_id
   AND pha.vendor_id = ap.vendor_id
   AND hla1.location_id = pha.ship_to_location_id
   AND papf.person_id = pha.agent_id
   AND SYSDATE BETWEEN papf.effective_start_date AND papf.effective_end_date
   AND ((pdtab.document_type_code IN ('PO', 'PA') AND
       pdtab.document_subtype = pha.type_lookup_code))
   AND pdta.document_subtype = pdtab.document_subtype
   AND pdta.document_type_code = pdtab.document_type_code
   AND pdta.org_id = Pdtab.org_id
   AND pha.org_id = pdta.org_id
   AND ap.vendor_id = assa.vendor_id
   AND pha.org_id = assa.org_id
   AND pha.vendor_id = assa.vendor_id
   AND pha.vendor_site_id = assa.vendor_site_id
   AND pha.bill_to_location_id = hla2.ship_to_location_id
   AND pla.po_header_id = pha.po_header_id
   AND pltb.line_type_id = pla.line_type_id
   AND pla.line_type_id = pltt.line_type_id
   AND pltt.language = USERENV('LANG')
   AND msib.inventory_item_id = pla.item_id
   AND plla.po_line_id = pla.po_line_id
   AND msib.organization_id = plla.ship_to_organization_id
   AND mcb.category_id = pla.category_id
   AND pda.po_line_id = pla.po_line_id
   AND pda.po_header_id = pha.po_header_id
   AND pda.code_combination_id = gcc.code_combination_id
   AND at.term_id = pha.terms_id
   AND ood.organization_id = plla.ship_to_organization_id
   AND pda.deliver_to_person_id = papf.person_id
   AND hla3.location_id = pda.deliver_to_location_id
   AND haou.organization_id = prha.org_id
   AND haou.language = USERENV('LANG')
   AND prha.org_id = pha.org_id
   AND prha.requisition_header_id = prla.requisition_header_id
   AND pda.req_distribution_id = prda.distribution_id
   AND prda.requisition_line_id = prla.requisition_line_id
   AND haou.organization_id = hou.organization_id
   AND prla.org_id = pha.org_id
   AND prda.code_combination_id = gcc.code_combination_id    --added
   AND hla3.inventory_organization_id = msib.organization_id   --added
   AND pda.line_location_id = prla.line_location_id --added
   AND plla.po_header_id = pha.po_header_id --added
I tested it for 10 POs. for 2 the query is giving right value. but for others it is giving wrong value.
Mainly the PO Charge Account, accrual and variance account values are not matching. What changes I can make to get the correct data?
I am using r12 version
Thanks

Hi Srini,
Thanks for replying. I check and the application context is set.
I think we might be missing certain conditions. Can you help me with that.

SAP sales return system should not accept quantity more than open quantity

Dear All
During sales return user is able to enter the quantity more than open quantity and system is allowing for that enter
Plz tell me how to restrict this
Regards
Arun

No need of exit for this.
Go to VTAF, select the item category for the combination of order type and billing type and maintain "+" for the field "Pos./neg. quantity"
Also go to OVAH and change message class V4 no 229 to E will work.
Now try to create a return order and increase the quantity. Sytem will not allow to do so but if you create a new line item, then system will also for which, you can go for exit already suggested.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Goto link query is not giving exact results

Hi Folks
I am having issue with GOTO query.
My main query gives details of Employee seperation in particular year.
For this query i have goto query.
When i am checking the details of goto query ,it is giving incorrect results.
Your help is appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Reddy

Hi Hari,
Check in RSBBS, whether you specified the receiver query correctly...
Check the link:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/99/08629bd3e41d418530c6849df303c9/content.htm]
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Yokesh.

SPEL not giving desired result

Hi ALL,
SPEL
*${oa.TestPVO1.xxDisable}* on Disable Property for a button
In CO
OAApplicationModule am = (OAApplicationModule)pageContext.getApplicationModule(webBean);
am.invokeMethod("hide");
In AM
public void hide()
OAViewObject disvo = (OAViewObject)getTestPVO1();
if (!disvo.isPreparedForExecution())
disvo.executeQuery();
Row drow = disvo.createRow();//.getCurrentRow();
disvo.insertRow(drow);
drow.setAttribute("xxDisable", Boolean.FALSE);
NOT giving desired o/p to disable the button
Thanks,
Sombit.
Edited by: Sombit on Oct 1, 2009 7:33 AM

Try assigning the SPEL value in the *VORowImpl.
First, in order to assign a value to SPEL, you'll need to create a custom VO. Here's a sample query I've used to create my VO to pull data pertainining to if an Attribute should be mandatory/rendered.
SELECT min(descriptive_flex_context_code) descriptive_flex_context_code, min(Enabled) Enabled, min(END_USER_COLUMN_NAME) END_USER_COLUMN_NAME, min(required_flag) required_flag, min(application_column_name) application_column_name,
min(xxx.LOV) LOV
from
(SELECT descriptive_flex_context_code,'Y' Enabled, END_USER_COLUMN_NAME, required_flag, application_column_name,
decode(ffvv.flex_value,null,'N','Y') LOV
FROM FND_DESCR_FLEX_COL_USAGE_VL fdfc,
fnd_flex_values_vl ffvv
WHERE (fdfc.APPLICATION_ID=20045)
and (fdfc.DESCRIPTIVE_FLEXFIELD_NAME LIKE 'SPL Account Map')
and fdfc.enabled_flag = 'Y'
and fdfc.display_flag = 'Y'
and fdfc.application_column_name = 'ATTRIBUTE5'
and ffvv.flex_value_set_id(+) = fdfc.flex_value_set_id
and rownum = 1) xxx
Once the VO is created, I created several transient "boolean" attributes in my VO. These attributes will be assigned a value based on code I place in my *VORowImpl since this is the file which controls attribute assignments.
But before that, in my *VOImpl, I've defined a custom method which is used to execute the VO from my AM.
public class Ref5PVOImpl extends OAViewObjectImpl
* This is the default constructor (do not remove)
public Ref5PVOImpl()
public void initRef5PVO()
// setWhereClause("descriptive_flex_context_code in (select vendor_name from spl_account_map where cont_cd = :1)");
setWhereClauseParams(null); //Always reset
// setWhereClauseParam(0, acct);
// System.out.println("value_selected customer>> "+acct);
executeQuery();
In my *VORowImpl, I've added custom code to my Attribute methods so that they return the proper values when invoked...
public String getMakeRequired()
if (getRequiredFlag()!= null)
if ("Y".equals(getRequiredFlag()))
//if(getMessageChoiceAttribute()==null)
System.out.println("Required returned yes");
return "yes";
else
System.out.println("Required returned no");
return "no";
else
return "no"; //poplist will be disabled - DFF is not configured
public Boolean getOptionRender()
if (getLov()!= null)
// In this method check if the Message Text Input is valid
if ("N".equals(getLov()))
System.out.println("OptionRender returned true "+ getLov());
return Boolean.TRUE; //text input will be enabled if no LOV exists
else
System.out.println("OptionRender returned false "+ getLov());
return Boolean.FALSE; //text input will be disabled if LOV exists
else
return Boolean.FALSE; //text input will be disabled - DFF is not configured
Then add your SPEL directive into your field's Property inpector...
${oa.Ref5PVO1.MakeRequired}
${oa.Ref5PVO1.OptionRender}

Query not showing desired result

Hi All,
DB :-10.2.0.3
I am using following query to extarct the backuppice, which falls between the dates specified by query. I am really amazed, why it's not giving me the expected results.
select handle, to_char(start_time, 'dd-mon-yy hh24:mi:ss') "start_time" , to_char(completion_time, ' dd-mon-yy hh24:mi:ss') "end_time" from
v$backup_piece where
to_char(start_time,'dd-mon-yy hh24:mi:ss') >'27-oct-10 23:00:00'
and
to_char(completion_time,'dd-mon-yy hh24:mi:ss')<'28-oct-10 04:20:53'
Results truncated, just to fit in this window.
23:02:25
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/c-465769364-20100927-0c                         27-sep-10 23:02:39           27-sep-10
23:02:40
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/LNEVRPP1_ctl_l1_t730854174_s32554_p1.rmn        27-sep-10 23:02:58           27-sep-10
23:02:59
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/c-465769364-20100927-0d                         27-sep-10 23:03:02           27-sep-10
23:03:02
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/LNEVRPP1_arc_l1_t730854220_s32556_p1.rmn        27-sep-10 23:03:41           27-sep-10
23:03:44
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/c-465769364-20100927-0e                         27-sep-10 23:03:51           27-sep-10
23:03:51
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/LNEVRPP1_dbf_l0_t733532449_s33531_p1.rmn        27-oct-10 23:00:50           27-oct-10
23:36:00
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/LNEVRPP1_dbf_l0_t733534566_s33532_p1.rmn        27-oct-10 23:36:07           27-oct-10
23:48:38
HANDLE                                                                                start_time                  end_time
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/arc2adsm/LNEVRPP1_arc_l0_t733536053_s33534_p1.rmn        28-oct-10 00:00:54           28-oct-10
00:01:13
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/c-465769364-20101028-00                         28-oct-10 00:01:22           28-oct-10
00:01:23
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/LNEVRPP1_dbf_l0_t733535322_s33533_p1.rmn        27-oct-10 23:48:43           28-oct-10
00:20:06
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/LNEVRPP1_dbf_l0_t733537209_s33536_p1.rmn        28-oct-10 00:20:10           28-oct-10
00:33:44
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/c-465769364-20101028-01                         28-oct-10 00:33:47           28-oct-10
00:33:48
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/LNEVRPP1_ctl_l0_t733538041_s33538_p1.rmn        28-oct-10 00:34:04           28-oct-10
00:34:04
/data/oracle/LNEVRPP1/backup/database/c-465769364-20101028-02                         28-oct-10 00:34:06           28-oct-10
00:34:07

Hi
Try:
select handle, to_char(start_time, 'dd-mon-yy hh24:mi:ss') "start_time" , to_char(completion_time, ' dd-mon-yy hh24:mi:ss') "end_time"
from v$backup_piece
where start_time > to_date ('27-oct-10 23:00:00','dd-mon-yy hh24:mi:ss')
and completion_time < to_date ('28-oct-10 23:00:00','dd-mon-yy hh24:mi:ss')
Regards,
Tycho

Query not showing detailed result when run through query Designer or Portal

Hi,
There is one query which not showing detailed result while running through Query Designer or run in Portal.
But strange thing is that it is showing the detailed result when i run it through BeX Analyzer.
While all the other queries don't have this problem in system. All showing the correct detailed result.
If anyone have some idea on this issue plz let me know.
Regards,
Javed
Edited by: Javed Akhtar on Jul 7, 2009 3:59 PM

Hi,
We can do this setting in WAD. Please check the web template and try to remove that setting. When you have hierarchy then we can display only till certain level in portal, this setting is done in web template APIs, but in bex analyzer you can see all the detailed information.
Edited
Go through this thread for some more detailed information
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/44/7b5f0a95ce12d0e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Regards,
rik

Query not retrieving exact results.

I have a query which shows different result from what i have it in the cube.
I have a document number in rows and two key figures one amount and another which shows no. of days for clearance. In the cube, for the same selection criteria , it gives me three records for the same document no. but in query its is gving me one record with different values in KF.
sample.
In cube
Doc Amount No. Days for CLearance
59    100 31
59    400 14
59    500 38
In query the result shows as
59   1000   1
Any Ideas where it is doing wrong. No of days for clearance is calculated from the difference btw posting date and clearing date. I need No. of Days to further develop this query.Is it something to do with compression, or query cache..
Any Ideas!!1
Thanks in Advance..
Veeru

Sorry, the Result I've shown may be little confusion .. Here is the clear picture..
In query..
DOC -
Amount -
No.of Days to CLearing
59 -
1000 -
1
In Cube
DOC -
Amount -
No.of Days to CLearing
59 -
100----
31
59 -
500-------14
59--400-----18
the value of Days to Clearing is showing as 1.
Properties of that key figure are defined as follows..
KF as NUMBER
Aggregation :Summation
Exp.Aggregation : Counter All Values.
Ref Characteristic : cal day.
Is this something related to the display properties in BEX. Again, In cube the records are correct..
Thanks
Veeru

ORA-00904 ON A PLSQL QUERY RETURNING SQL QUERY ( NOT ALWAYS )

Running a classic report , we sometimes face the error :
<pre>failed to parse SQL query:
ORA-00904: : invalid identifier
Even when using the same parameters, sometimes the report runs and some others we get the error.
The report is called by a url from a different page
f?p=&APP_ID.:500:&APP_SESSION.:FLOW_EXCEL_OUTPUT_R&P503_RUN_REGION_ID._el:NO::P500_RUN_RG,P500_RG11_FILTER1:1,&P503_FILTER1.
THE EVNVIRONMENT IS THE FOLLOWING
ORACLE DATABASE 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 -64bit
Apex Application Express 4.1.0.00.32
In the apex on the same workspace we have 2 copies of the same application having different schema.
We did not face this problem in Oracle 10g

hello,
I send you the function. rs_check_limit .
In one case when i tried to debug in order to understand the error, the function was not fired.
FUNCTION rs_check_limit ( p_trade_date_from date
, p_trade_date_to date, p_session_id number , p_user_id varchar2
, p_pct_sum_prcp_cd number
,p_rs_list_exclude varchar2 default ' '
return rs_check_limit_tb PIPELINED
is
v_data rs_check_limit_tp :=rs_check_limit_tp ( null, null,null, null,null, null,null, null,null, null );
CURSOR exec_trades_prcp_cur (vc_risk_date_from date
, vc_risk_date_to date
, vc_rs_list_exclude varchar2
is
select PRCP_CD
, clr_sys_cd
, clr_acc_cd
,avg( exec_trades_value_mkt ) avg_exec_trades_prcp
,SUM( exec_trades_value_mkt ) sum_exec_trades_prcp
from
select trd_dt, PRCP_CD , clr_sys_cd
, clr_acc_cd , sum ( exec_trades_value_mkt ) exec_trades_value_mkt
from
select lst_cmpt_dt trd_dt , PRCP_CD , clr_sys_cd
, clr_acc_cd
,SUM (BUYS_VALUE+ SELLS_VALUE) exec_trades_value_mkt
from rs_mm_rsk_lmts_dtls
where 1=1
and lst_cmpt_dt > vc_risk_date_from -1
and lst_cmpt_dt <= vc_risk_date_to
and instr( vc_rs_list_exclude, TRIM(clr_acc_cd)|| '.')= 0
group by lst_cmpt_dt , PRCP_CD , clr_sys_cd
, clr_acc_cd
UNION ALL
select trunc ( apx_rs_risk_info.get_d_n_cur (lst_cmpt_dt,- 1) ) trd_dt , PRCP_CD , clr_sys_cd
, clr_acc_cd, SUM (BUYS_VALUE+ SELLS_VALUE) exec_trades_value_mkt
from rs_mm_rsk_lmts_dtls
where trd_dt = apx_rs_risk_info.get_d_n_cur ( lst_cmpt_dt , 2 )
and lst_cmpt_dt > apx_rs_risk_info.get_d_n_cur (vc_risk_date_from ,1 )-1
and lst_cmpt_dt < vc_risk_date_to
and instr( vc_rs_list_exclude, TRIM(clr_acc_cd)|| '.')= 0
group by apx_rs_risk_info.get_d_n_cur (lst_cmpt_dt , -1 ) ,PRCP_CD , clr_sys_cd
, clr_acc_cd
group by trd_dt, PRCP_CD , clr_sys_cd
, clr_acc_cd
group by PRCP_CD , clr_sys_cd
, clr_acc_cd
CURSOR exec_trades_all_cur (vc_risk_date_from date
, vc_risk_date_to date
, vc_rs_list_exclude varchar2)
is
select SUM( exec_trades_value_mkt ) sum_exec_trades_all -- óõíïëéêÞ çìåñÞóéá áîßá óõíáëëáãùí áãïñÜò
, avg( exec_trades_value_mkt ) avg_exec_trades_all
from
select trd_dt, sum( exec_trades_value_mkt ) exec_trades_value_mkt
from
--gia T : T, T-1 , T-2
select lst_cmpt_dt trd_dt , SUM (BUYS_VALUE+ SELLS_VALUE) exec_trades_value_mkt
from rs_mm_rsk_lmts_dtls
where 1=1
and lst_cmpt_dt > vc_risk_date_from -1
and lst_cmpt_dt <= vc_risk_date_to
and instr( vc_rs_list_exclude, TRIM(clr_acc_cd)|| '.')= 0
group by lst_cmpt_dt
union all
--gia T EPIPLEON: T-3
select apx_rs_risk_info.get_d_n_cur (lst_cmpt_dt,-1) trd_dt , SUM (BUYS_VALUE+ SELLS_VALUE) exec_trades_value_mkt
from rs_mm_rsk_lmts_dtls
where trd_dt = apx_rs_risk_info.get_d_n_cur ( trunc ( lst_cmpt_dt ) , +2 )
and lst_cmpt_dt > apx_rs_risk_info.get_d_n_cur (vc_risk_date_from ,1 )-1
and lst_cmpt_dt < vc_risk_date_to
and instr( vc_rs_list_exclude, TRIM(clr_acc_cd)|| '.')= 0
group by apx_rs_risk_info.get_d_n_cur (lst_cmpt_dt , -1 )
group by trd_dt
exec_trades_prcp_row exec_trades_prcp_cur%rowtype;
exec_trades_all_row exec_trades_all_cur%rowtype;
i number := 0;
tmp varchar2(4) := null;
procedure feed_table is
BEGIN
v_data.prcp_cd := exec_trades_prcp_row.prcp_cd;
v_data.clr_sys_cd := exec_trades_prcp_row.clr_sys_cd;
v_data.clr_acc_cd := trim(exec_trades_prcp_row.clr_acc_cd);
v_data.member_id := RS_GET_PRCP_MEMBER_ID(exec_trades_prcp_row.prcp_cd);
v_data.member_dsc := RS_GET_PRCP_DSC(exec_trades_prcp_row.prcp_cd);
v_data.sumTRADES_VALUE_PRCP_CD_T := round( exec_trades_prcp_row.sum_exec_trades_prcp,2);
v_data.mkt_sumTRADES_VALUE_PRCP_CD_T := round( exec_trades_all_row.sum_exec_trades_all,2) ;
v_data.avgTRADES_VALUE_PRCP_CD_T := round( exec_trades_prcp_row.avg_exec_trades_prcp,2);
v_data.mkt_avgTRADES_VALUE_PRCP_CD_T := round( exec_trades_all_row.avg_exec_trades_all,2) ;
v_data.pct_sum_prcp_cd := round( 100* exec_trades_prcp_row.sum_exec_trades_prcp
/ exec_trades_all_row.sum_exec_trades_all , 2);
end ;
begin
exec_trades_all_row := null;
open exec_trades_all_cur (vc_risk_date_from => p_trade_date_from
, vc_risk_date_to => p_trade_date_to
,vc_rs_list_exclude => NVL(p_rs_list_exclude ,'.' )
fetch exec_trades_all_cur INTO exec_trades_all_row;
close exec_trades_all_cur;
for exec_trades_prcp_rec in exec_trades_prcp_cur (vc_risk_date_from => p_trade_date_from
, vc_risk_date_to => p_trade_date_to
,vc_rs_list_exclude => NVL(p_rs_list_exclude ,'.' )
loop
exec_trades_prcp_row := exec_trades_prcp_rec;
if exec_trades_all_row.sum_exec_trades_all <> 0 then
if 100* exec_trades_prcp_row.sum_exec_trades_prcp
/ exec_trades_all_row.sum_exec_trades_all >= p_pct_sum_prcp_cd then
i := i+1;
v_data :=rs_check_limit_tp ( null, null,null, null,null, null,null, null,null, null );
feed_table;
pipe row ( v_data );
end if;
end if;
end loop;
end;
I send you the dll for the type
CREATE OR REPLACE
TYPE rs_check_limit_tp as object
prcp_cd varchar2(10)
, member_id varchar2(4)
, member_dsc varchar2(120)
, clr_sys_cd varchar2(4)
, clr_acc_cd varchar2(6)
, avgTRADES_VALUE_PRCP_CD_T number
, mkt_avgTRADES_VALUE_PRCP_CD_T number
, sumTRADES_VALUE_PRCP_CD_T number
, mkt_sumTRADES_VALUE_PRCP_CD_T number
, pct_sum_prcp_cd number
and the table dll
CREATE TABLE rs_mm_rsk_lmts_dtls
(trd_dt DATE NOT NULL,
prcp_cd VARCHAR2(10 BYTE) NOT NULL,
clr_sys_cd CHAR(4 BYTE),
clr_acc_cd CHAR(10 BYTE),
sec_isin_cd VARCHAR2(12 BYTE) NOT NULL,
buys NUMBER(19,0),
sells NUMBER(19,0),
buys_value NUMBER(19,6),
sells_value NUMBER(19,6),
abs_b_minus_s NUMBER(19,2),
rsk_prc NUMBER(13,6),
net_value NUMBER(19,2) NOT NULL,
sr NUMBER(19,2) NOT NULL,
mm NUMBER(19,2) NOT NULL,
lst_cmpt_dt DATE,
usr_id VARCHAR2(8 BYTE) NOT NULL,
cmt VARCHAR2(64 BYTE),
chg_dt DATE,
gr_b NUMBER(19,2) NOT NULL,
gr_s NUMBER(19,2) NOT NULL)
Thank you
Tonia

Sales return to be confiured to require a preceding sales order in referenc

Dear All,
System could be configured to require a preceding sales order document (from the intial sales flow) when creating a returns
order, ensuring the actual return is linked with a preceding sales transaction
Regards
Arun

Hello!
I read your message and actually helped me to think about some config, that is:
If I do not assign this field as M (mandatory), then I would have the possibility of creating the return order with reference to different billing documents, by selecting them from the menu. I could include as many as items as possible, once it is the same customer.
Is this reasonable or there is another way to create with reference of multiple billing documents.
Kind regards,
Fabiana Anjos

Query not giving me the output I want

Hi there,
I have the following query:
select rent_no, rent_end, count(*) as "NUMBER OF DRIVERS"
from rental where (rent_end IS NOT NULL) AND (rent_end between (select to_date(sysdate) from dual) and (select to_date(sysdate-7) from dual))
group by rent_no, rent_end
order by rent_end;
but it's not outputting my desired output. Basically, I want to view the selected columns where the RENT_END value is in the last seven days. So my output is supposed to look something like this:
RENT_NO RENT_END NUMBER OF DRIVERS
12345679 07-OCT-09 1
As you can see, the rent_end value is within the last seven days, but for some reason, it's not outputting at all. can anyone help?

I have a couple of recommendations:
select to_date(sysdate) from dualSYSDATE is already a date value, there is no need to use TO_DATE() to convert it to a date. In addition, you can just replace the whole select statement with SYSDATE.
rent_end between (select to_date(sysdate) from dual) and (select to_date(sysdate-7) from dual)This is probably the main reason why your query is not returning any rows. The BETWEEN is not setup correctly. It should be this:
BETWEEN <LOWER BOUND> AND <UPPER BOUND>However, you have yours flipped backwards. It should probably be:
RENT_END BETWEEN TRUNC(SYSDATE) - 7 AND TRUNC(SYSDATE+1) - 1/86400 /* 23:59:59 on the current day */HTH!

MIX sale return problem(query not giving required result)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for