Mixed costing over plants
Hallo,
I want to use mixed costing over plants.
The same material is produced in plant 200 and in plant 210. Both plants are part is the same company. For US-GAAP reasons those materials have to have the same standard price for valuation of the stock and the goods movement.
So, I want to calculate a mixed costing of 60% from plant 200 and 40°% from plant 210.
What did I do :
1. Solution using special procurement type for costing.
First, none of the plants have a special procurement type for costing.
Plant 200 has a procurement alternative (production 60% & stock transfer from 210 40%). I cost for plant 200 giving me a perfect mixed cost.
Then I set the special procurement type for costing in plant 210 to C2 indicating to get the cost price from plant 200.
Calculating this cost price also is OK. But as soon as I save this cost price, the CK13N reports of plant 200 and plant 210 are incorrect because they allow an unending drill-down :
Plant 200 = 60% of Plant 200 + 40% of Plant 210 = Plant 200 = 60% of Plant 200 + 40% of Plant 210 = Plant 200 .....
2. Solution using a procurement alternative per plant.
Here, I do not use a special procurement for costing anymore.
I define procurement alternatives as follows :
Plant 200
Producing in 200 60%
Stock transfer from 210 40%
Plant 210
Producing in 210 40%
Stock transfer from 200 60%
Costing version 1 is linked to those mixing ratios.
First I calculate a pure plant cost price with a costing variant V1 and costing version 2.
Result :
A pure plant cost estimate for plant 200 & a pure plant cost estimate for plant 210.
The I calculate the mixed costing for both plants with costing variant V2 and costing version 1.
Costing variant V2 has a transfer control : cross plant - get "other prices" within the fiscal year, from costing variant V1 and costing version 2.
When I calculate this mixed costing with CK11N, everything goes perfect. I get a mixed cost price in plant 200 and exactly the same in plant 210.
But, when I use CK40N, the intermediate calculations are written to the table KEKO and are used in the calculation of the mixed costing.
This is the result :
Plant 200 = 60% of plant 200 with cost price of pure plant 200
40% of plant 210 with mixed cost price of plant 210
Plant 210 = 40% of plant 210 with cost price of pure plant 210
60% of plant 200 with mixed cost price of plant 200
Result, I get different and incorrect mixed prices in both plants.
Who can help me. Since this seems to be a US-GAAP requirement, I cannot imagine that I am the only one facing this problem.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Kind regards.
Franciska Brys.
In solution 1, I had a procurement alternative and mixing ration in plant 200 and a special procurement type for costing in plant 210.
Before calculating the mixed costing in plant 200 I had to eliminate the spec.proc.type for costing in plant 210 otherwise, the calculation got into a loop.
Without the spc.proc.type in plant 210, I got a correct mixed costing in plant 200.
Then I enter the spec.proc. type for costing again in plant 210 and calculate the cost price. This copies the mixed costing from plant 200. So far, OK.
But as soon as I save this cost estimate in plant 210, the reports in CK11N or CK13N get incorrect for the first calculation made for plant 0210 while costing in plant 0200 is overwritten by this result. Now the report gets into a loop and you can drill down endlessly.
Similar Messages
-
Want to chnage the logic for ck40n bom valuation mixed costing ?
Dear Gurus,
In ck40n transaction,material bom valuation is depnding on mixed ratio.
My requirement is to change the logic,Iam debugging the ck40n transaction for costing,but iam unable to getting the right position to change the logic for mixed costing (average).
Thanks in advance,
CRIn solution 1, I had a procurement alternative and mixing ration in plant 200 and a special procurement type for costing in plant 210.
Before calculating the mixed costing in plant 200 I had to eliminate the spec.proc.type for costing in plant 210 otherwise, the calculation got into a loop.
Without the spc.proc.type in plant 210, I got a correct mixed costing in plant 200.
Then I enter the spec.proc. type for costing again in plant 210 and calculate the cost price. This copies the mixed costing from plant 200. So far, OK.
But as soon as I save this cost estimate in plant 210, the reports in CK11N or CK13N get incorrect for the first calculation made for plant 0210 while costing in plant 0200 is overwritten by this result. Now the report gets into a loop and you can drill down endlessly. -
Want to change logic for ck40n bom valuation for mixed costing ?
Dear Gurus,
In ck40n transaction,material bom valuation is depnding on mixed ratio.
My requirement is to change the logic,Iam debugging the ck40n transaction for costing,but iam unable to getting the right position to change the logic for mixed costing (average).
Thanks in advance,
CRIn solution 1, I had a procurement alternative and mixing ration in plant 200 and a special procurement type for costing in plant 210.
Before calculating the mixed costing in plant 200 I had to eliminate the spec.proc.type for costing in plant 210 otherwise, the calculation got into a loop.
Without the spc.proc.type in plant 210, I got a correct mixed costing in plant 200.
Then I enter the spec.proc. type for costing again in plant 210 and calculate the cost price. This copies the mixed costing from plant 200. So far, OK.
But as soon as I save this cost estimate in plant 210, the reports in CK11N or CK13N get incorrect for the first calculation made for plant 0210 while costing in plant 0200 is overwritten by this result. Now the report gets into a loop and you can drill down endlessly. -
Mixed costing and Target Costs
Hi
I have the following problem.
We are using within Product Costing the Mixed Costing functionality.
One semi-finished product is produced in 2 plants, standard price calculated according to a certain mix.
Everything fine in product costing so far.
When creating a PP order however, the target costs details are not taken over but only as a full amount under semi-finished consumables. Planned costs are taken over in detail.
After completion of the PP order, actual costs are made on materials, labour, etc, where the target costs are fully seen as semi-finished consumables. Therefor the variance analysis between actuals and target costs shows many differences within the Resource Usage Variance, which is not meant.
Can anyone help ?
Kind Regards,
JeVeThanks for your posting Rau,
Yes we did CK11N and CK24.
I think the problem is with the mixed costing.
In the calculation we have two lines per procurement alternative (one per production version), target cost on semi-finished materials cost element. Below that, there is a standard calaculation available, but only the higher level is taken into account when a PP order is created.
Maybe somewhere in the cost estimation is the problem.
In my situation I would like the PP order be targeted at the weighed average cost of the 2 production versions, but on the detailed level. But SAP just shows me the target of the 2 semi-finished products only.
The standard calculation look like
Product A 1000 euro
- 50% product line 1 550 euro
---cost beakdown:
materials 100 euro
labour 300 euro
etc. 150 euro
- 50% product line 2 450 euro
---cost beakdown:
materials 100 euro
labour 250 euro
etc. 100 euro
Target costs on the PP order are one cost element : semi-finished consumables for 1000 euros.
I would like to see target costs on the PP order :
materials 200
labour 550
other 250
Kind regards
JeVe -
Experts.
We are using mix costing T.Code:CK91N for Depots Standard cost estimate. Based on my retio T.Code CK94 system calc. std. cost well but I need to add Additive cost to depot stock.
I tried in CK74N with "V" Item Category for mixed costing but system not adding that cost in CK11n.
Is it possible to add Additive cost for Mixed costing. If it is possible please reply soon.
Thanks
Bhagiradh
Edited by: Bhagiradha Pinnamareddy on Jul 18, 2009 3:23 PM
Edited by: Bhagiradha Pinnamareddy on Jul 18, 2009 3:34 PMHi,
Thanking you for reply. I selected Additive cost Check box in Costing Variant only. I have not selected in Valuation Variant.
One depot is receiving stock from multiple manufacturing plants. We are using mixed costing with ratio for standard cost update for depot stock. Is it possible to add my transportation cost (additive cost plant wise) to my depot stock when I am doing CK11N? If it is possible, please explain me detailly step by step.
Thanking you
Best Regards from.
Bhagiradha. -
Issue in Mixed cost..
I have issue in Mixed cost..
Scenerio: just for example
BOM 1
Material A - HALB Rs 14
Material B - HALB + Activity cost Rs 2 -> Rs 12
Material C - HALB + Activity Cost Rs 2 -> Rs 10
Material D - ROH procured -> Rs 10
A can be procured directly from supplier as Rs 16.
I want to weighted average cost for Material A while releasing cost estimate & same should be update in material master accounting view
I Activate Mixed cost in spro. & maintain ck94 & ck91n. as prodcution version 1 as 50% procurement as 50%
But Weighted price not update in Material A. Only RS 14 is updated.
KIndly provide soultion for my issue. KIndly explain step by step..
With Regards
SwethaHi,
Maintain Vendor info record for Material Master and in costing variant select tab Material from vendor info record.
Regards,
Sreekanth -
Plan cost in Plant maintenance order
Hello,
I need to show plan cost in plant maintenance order on the report. It appears in the cost tab (overview tab inside the cost tab). Please let me know if you know any function module.
Regards,
Eswar.Try
CALL FUNCTION 'PM_WORKORDER_PLAN_COSTS_SET'
Standred program is using this FM and it has table " PMCO "<b>
include = LCOIHF2Y</b>
Hope thisll give you idea!!
<b>P.S award the points.</b>
Good luck
Thanks
Saquib Khan
"Some are wise and some are otherwise"<b></b> -
Urgent: Maintain std cost for plants under different company codes
Hi all,
Company code(s)/Plant(s): C1/P1, C2/P2, ..., CnPn
BOMs and Routings are maintained under P1. I believe that unlike BOM routing can't be made available across plants. So how does one maintain std cost across plants under different company codes?
Thanks.Hi,
You have to maintain individual BOM, Routing and varaint for all plants.
Best Regards
Ashish Jain -
Variances within Mixed Costing
Hi,
we have implemented mixed costing. We use the standard price, and standard price changes are exceptional. Material Ledger is not in use. Production uses process orders (PP-PI). We will use mixed costing for dual sourcing, i.e. different supply sources or production versions, and we expect that the corresponding ratios will change during the year.
Now there are several questions regarding the corresponding variances:
1) how can we identify production variances, i.e. production costs versus standard costs
2) how can we identify purchase variances, i.e. purchase costs versus standard price
Ideally these mixed costing variances are shown on separate accounts.
I would be very glad if you could help me.
Kind regards, MarcMi Marc,
we post purchase price differences to a separate account from our production variances. We don't use PP-PI but I think the principle should still work. For the PRD postings in the MM<>FI account assignment, use the general modifier to distinguish between purchase price differences (blank) and production variances (PRF)
regards
Mark -
Distribution of cost over periods in detailed planning in CCA KP06
Good Day everyone
Please advice how to control distribution of cost over periods in Detailed planning in Cost center accounting. KP06.
When detailed planning is carried out which is integrated with MM, distribution of cost over periods is automatically set (02 distribution as before) and i cannot manually set the distribution key to 0 or 1
We are using ECC6
How can i control manual distribution of plan cost while remaining in Detailed planning.Hi,
You can distribute your planned costs at activity level based on the distributionkey you specified. The distribution is done for the entire duration of activity depending on the Dist key you select. If you do not put any Dist key, then the costs would be distributed equally across the entire duration of activity. If you want to have equal distribution of costs, you can use DK- SAP020 which distributes on earliest dates of activity using Factory calender. If you want you can also define your own DK in SPRO under: Production->capacity requirements planning->operations->capacity requirements->distribution.
Hope this clarifies..
Best regards.. -
Product calculation in combination with additive cost and mixed costing
Hello all,
I want to calculate trading good. I have defined a mixed costing for this article. Additional I had entered additive costs for the same article. When I run the calculation, it works only with the definitions of the mixed costing. Does the calculation take either the mixed costing or the additive cost?
Best regards
JürgenWe also faced similar issue & had approched SAP for the same. As clarified by SAP, additive cost with mixed costing is not supported.
You may try using reference costing variant for this.
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar -
CK727 -Lot size cannot be passed on in combination with mixed costing
I get below error.
We have KMAT materials and scenario is Non Valuated Sales Order Stock.
in our PPC4 - we have below settings. (Both are SAP recommended)
Qty Structure tab we have Pass on Lot size "1" with individual requirements (must of Non Valuated Sales) and
Transfer Control "PC03" has "Current Std Cost" with "Transfer only with Collective requirements"
I just created a mixed cost qty structure. In it I even added Costing type "01". Sales order costing type is "18".
Mixed costing works as expected. However we are unable to create any Sales Orders.
Lot size cannot be passed on in combination with mixed costing
Message no. CK727
Diagnosis
For costing variant PPC4 and costing version 01, it was defined in Customizing that a mixed cost estimate should be created for quantity structure category M0001. At the same time, it was defined in the costing variant that the Pass_on_lot_size function should be active.
System Response
Mixed costing cannot be carried out simultaneously with Pass on lot size . Costing cannot be proceeded with.
Any help is appreciated.Hi Kala,
system's response is correct
In the standard program the combination of mixed costing and
simultaneously pass on lot size is not possible.
Please review SAP Notes 402440, 584420 and 749128 .
In particular the SAP Note 402440 describes the determination of the
costing lot size at a mixed costing in detail.
br, Guido -
Additive Cost in Mixed costing
Hi
Is it possile to get additive cost in Mixed costing?. I have created Procurement alternatives and Mixing ratios. also "Additive cost included" is selected in Costing Variant and additive cost check box was selected in Valuation Variant.
I have created additive cost with Category V (Variable item). But additive cost is not picking in standard cost estimate (CK11N)
anybody can help me.
Thanks in adavance.
regards
SrinivasHi Srinivas
I think you have not assigned the additive cost component split in the Cost component structure. Unless you dont assign the same it would show the same in the standard cost estimate.
I think this should solve your requirement.
Regards,
Suraj -
Hi,
Please can any one say about costing in Plant Maintenance.
Thanks in advance.I see this question is still not answered, and it looks as though Naresh is hoping for a user-exit to populate the estimated costs field.
I have scoured all the user-exits and found nothing suitable, or even close.
It also surprises me that you would want this populated automatically from IP30.
If you have maintained a task list in your plan you will get planned costs.
The purpose of estimated costs is to add fuzzy human logic to the planned costs.
How could a user-exit do that?
You could look at user exit IWO10009 Customer Check for 'Save' Event
or
PM maintenance order: Customer check for order release
Here's the full list (to the best of my knowledge) for Orders:
Orders
CNEX0013
Order: Cust. enhancement: Default item category comp. Assgmt
IWO10001
Create a PM sub-order
IWO10002
PM maintenance order: Customer check for order release
IWO10004
Maintenance order: Customer check for order completion
IWO10005
Maintenance order: Cust.-specif. determination of profit ctr
IWO10006
Maint. order: Fcode exclusion through cust. Enhancement
IWO10007
Maint.order: Customer enhancement - permits in the order
IWO10008
Cust. enhancement: Determination of tax jurisdiction code
IWO10009
PM Order: Customer Check for 'Save' Event
IWO10010
Maint. order: Cust. enhancement for determining WBS element
IWO10011
Maint. order: Customer enhancement for component selection
IWO10012
Maintenance order: Priority handling on central header
IWO10015
Maintenance order: F4 Help for user fields on operation
IWO10016
PM Order: Cust. enhancement to check operation user fields
IWO10017
Determine external order number by customer logic
IWO10018
Maintenance order: User fields on order header
IWO10020
Maintenance order: Automatically include task list
IWO10021
Automatic task list transfer when creating order from notif.
IWO10022
Determine calendar from user exit
IWO10023
Service order: Change header data for advance shipment doc.
IWO10024
Service order: Changes to items for advance shipment
IWO10025
PM/SM order: Finding responsible cost center
IWO10026
User check on setting status 'Do not perform'
IWO10027
User exit: Generate user-defined settlement rule
IWO10029
Inclusion of bill of material in PM/SM order
IWO20001
PM order: User exit to pass routing to order
COOM0001
Customer Functions for Overhead Percentages
COZF0001
Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
COZF0002
Change purchase req. for externally procured component
CY190001
Capacity Planning: Change order operation -
Hi,
Business process :- Importing RAW material 100% , which is used for Export upto 90% and 10% Used for Domestic sale . cost estimate should be required for both senerio Export as well Demostic sales ,
I Was configured mixed costing for that i have maintained Costing version, production version, valuation type for domestic as wel Export price will be separately maintained but while running costing system update below
1) Current standard cost estimate costing version 1
2) Cost estimate w/o material master reference costing version 2
Business requirement is cost esimate will be Current standard cost estimate for both costing version.
could you help me what mistake i made
Regards,
VinuHi Young,
Thanks for the reply
i have maintaine the same whicj u specified above , i have linked valuation variant 001 for standard cost estimate PPC1 system.and system updating std cost estimate is both level as well both version
1) Current standard cost estimate costing version 1
2) Cost estimate w/o material master reference costing version 2
Business requirement is cost esimate will be Current standard cost estimate for both costing version.
business requirement is only one standard cost estimate
Regards.
Vinu
Maybe you are looking for
-
Copy text: acrobat 9 pro vs X pro
Dear people, Something strange is driving me to the edge of total frustration. I have a unsecured PDF. With text. Bold and not bold. Simple, you would think. On my personal iMac i have acrobat 9 pro. I copy. I past in word. Everything is fine. 1 font
-
Hello, for our business process, we need to map a single source message to multiple target messages (of different message types). The (ABAP)mapping takes care of this mapping, so I put a transformation step after my receiver step, that invokes this m
-
I just got a new macbook pro, firefox is being very glitchy, please help?
I just got a new Macbook pro yesterday. I took it home and downloaded the newest Firefox (my go-to browser for years), and I'm having some pretty substantial issues. First, I tried streaming a movie on Netflix last night, and I'm getting a really obs
-
I use tools -> clear recent history -> browsing & download history (everything) However, all the news or urls I visit couple months ago always auto-appeared when I type the url in the location bar. I've observed this situation since Firefox 4 or 5, s
-
hi, Even though the PR is not approved the user want to create RFQ for that PR.But SAP wouldn't allow to do it. an error message was displayed. Is there any user exit to process the RFQ with out the approval of PR. Thanks!