ML- Actual price release where

hi
i need to use actual price of closed period for next period as std price. where is?
regards
sowmya

hi
In the last ckmlcp, it is marked as a future price, i want to use that period unit price as standard price for next period, what is path/T/C
exp: march std.price:200, but actual price 250.so in the april 250 should be taken as standard price for inventory valuation and i have selected "dynamic price change release active", in the ckmlcp i marked but in the accounting tab in the future price column it is appearing ,but in costing tab under future price column it is not updating , but i need that price as std. price for the inventory calculation.
Regards
sowmya

Similar Messages

Material Ledger - release actual price as the standard price for the next-

Hi Gurus, Sap Library /documentation about Material Ledger says:
"At the end of the period, an actual price is calculated for each material based on the actual costs of the period. This actual price is called the periodic unit price and can be used to revaluate the inventory for the period to be closed. In addition, you can use this actual price as the standard price for the next period."
How Can I do that? i've calculated the new actual price but i could release it as a new standar costo.
Kind Regards
André

Hi Both,
I think there is something else to add to this, the new PUP price can only be applicable in the period N+2 where N=Period of closing. This is something that is not specifically mentions in SAP documents.(not that I know of ) but I found it the hard way!
Cheers

Table name where actual price of P.O. item has been stored

Hello Exparts,
I want P.O. item amount which having Net Price, all taxes of taht P.O. item as well as deliverable cost and any other deduction in the net price. i.e. actual price which is paid but with P.O. item combination.
Can any one tell me the table name, where this actual amount stored of P.O. item.
Thanks in advance...!!
Regards,
Poonam.

Hi,
The KNUMV field in EKKO table is empty for my case. For your information, i have purchase contract with pricing type. But the field KNUMV field is empty. Whereas, if i check using purchase order, the KNUMV field is filled with number. Why is it so? And how do i link to table EINA and KONH table if the KNUMV field is empty?
Thanks

CKME Manual Price Release Error (C+811)

My Dear Experts....
The process of client is.....
Do cost estimate for the next period (i.e. costing date from as 1st of every next period) and marking using CK40N on every month 28th
On last day of the month, after business hours, they lock all users except the one performing
Open MM periods (ex: now next month i.e. June)
Open FI periods
Do manual release using CKME
The problem happened is majority of the materials got released except few. For those materials system throughs error message C+811 which says price release can't be done as some of the actual postings have been done for the period (you can find the error message in the screen shot).
I tried to find out what are the actual postings happened against the materials for the peirod, but there are no documents posted.
NOTE: This is the 1st month costing run after upgrading to ECC 6 from 4.6C
I have checked different notes like 190707, 454047, 574930, 1492789, 185837, 555176.
Out of the above 555176 (Late price change) is relevant, but when I propose to client, they say we are not late to apply this note (we are in the initial days of the month).
Even 574930 (resetting material ledger status) is also relevant as I find the status of the materials are more than 30 only. But even client is not ready to accept.
The client wants to know why this error coming up when there are no actual postings related to materials happened?
If you have better idea please advice me how to check out the actual postings happened against materials in this case (either any T.codes, tables etc)
Hoping the solution ASAP....
Regards.....
Jose

Hi Jose,
Let me give you a brief understanding about this issue.
Currently you are working with Material ledger where you guys would have selected price determination as 3 'Single level/Multilevel Price determination'. Further Material ledger for a material in particular period can have following status.
1. Period Opened
2. Quantities and value entered
3. Single level Price determination
4. Multilevel Price determination
5. Period Closed
You can check this statuses in transaction CKM3N. So SAP will allow to release the price of material in the current month, if no goods movement happened during current month and CKM3N has status 'Period Opened'.
First of all execute CKM3N, check any receipts/consumption postings. If it is there kindly reverse.
Sometimes status also gets change when revaluation of consumptions/post closing document gets posted. This you can check inside the beginning inventory.
There are two steps to come of this situation:
1. Reverse the receipts/consumption, if any.
2. Reverse the material ledger using CKMI. Enter the parameters, check checkboxes if you want to revaluate material and consumption. Then go to menu Closing entry and select Reverse.
The last previous period should be opened.
3. Then you need to change the material ledger status from 'Quantity and value Entered' to 'Period Opened'. There is program to change status, I don't remember correctly. You may check in Google.
4.Then release the price and again close the ML.
This is very cumbersome task so kindly follow below approach.
1. Execute MR21, enter the parameter posting date, company code and plant. Enter LTPC (Late price change) in the ok code (where you enter transaction code) and click on enter.
2. Then enter the material and select the material line item. Go to menu Edit and click on default planned price and click on enter and save. This will release your planned price.
Do reverse any posted receipts/consumption.
If somebody suggest you to change the price determination from 3 to 2 and back to 2 to3. Please do not follow, as it will delete the ML history for current period, previous period and 12 period last fiscal year.
It is always better to be safe, so please dynamic price change functionality.
As soon as your first good movement happens for the current period, system will automatically release the planned price. This is a configuration setting.
Hope, it helps.
Regards
Mohit Singla

Not able to view actual Price updated 'Value' in Change Tracker

I was able to get my Change tracker to work and it is functioning. (SRM 5.0 MDM5.5 )... Configured Portal iViews for change tracker.
If I change a description I can see it in the change tracker application. But if I try and track a Price change it only shows me a date-time and user as to I when the price was changed it doesnu2019t show me the actual value changed, for my audit purposes.
On the portal the change tracker "Field" dropdown shows -> Price Updated. this is what is tracking any change of price.
In MDM Console-> Admin->Change Tracker I am tracking under Catalog Items: Price information, Price Updated, Special search terms, long description.
When I look at the Data manager in the Record Detail, I see u2018Price Updatedu2019 and it only has a Date and time stamp. In this same Record Detail, I see the field Price Information that contains :Lower bound, Purchasing Info record ID, Purchasing Organization, Amount and Currency. Amount-> contains the actual price value. This is what i want to see in the portal iView as Old value and New value....this is what I am unable to view? theres one small step i am not doing...
I am trying to track the actual change in the filed u2018Amountu2019u2026 I have tried to search for it in the Portal iView fields (table, record contains, fields, record)
cheers
alex

Hi Alex,
I would not here comment on change Tracking functionality but can you suggest another workaround to achieve this requirement. If it fits in your requirement you can go ahead with it.
In MDM, Create another field in Main table say Initial Price and for already existing field Amount replace its name with Updated Price in Qualified table Price.
now after this you will see that your by default Updated Price has values as it was your Amount field earlier and Initial Price field as empty. Now for next time, if any record comes using Import Manager then MDM workflow should trigger at Record Import.
This workflow contains following steps.
Start(Checkout)>Assign>Stop(CheckIn)
Assign step should have below expression and assignment:
Price Information.Updated Price
Where I am assuming Price Information is the field in main table which is look up to this qualified table Price.
So in this way you can maintain both existing and updated values of Price and cant then show in your Catalog.
suppose you have already existing record say 1 which has value of Amount as 20.
So that means you have Updated Price as 20 and Initial Price as empty(Null)
Now when same record 1 updates with new Amount say 40, it triggers this workflow on record import which will then assign value of existing updated Price 20 to Initial Field after that Updated Price will update by 40.
Note: This Assignment works well only if your main table record has this Qualified table link as single record. If your main table record contains more than one qualified links then this Assignment would not work fine. So use only if it fits.
Regards,
Mandeep Saini

Use an alternative Exchange Rate Type for activity actual price

Dear All,
I try to use an alternative Exchange Rate (not M) in controlling area version "0", I need to use a custom currency exchange rate like in planned price (here I create a new planned version with exchange rate "N").
I find same notes and it seems that standard Sap use only Exchange Rate "M" for actual price but I notice that for example in transaction KB21N (activity allocation) system shows in additional info exchange rate "N" (input in version "0").
Is not possibile to use other Exchange Rate for actual price, activity allocation, for confirmed activity in production order?
Controlling area has currency type 30 (group currency EUR), this company has MXN.
Thanks in advance for your support
Daria

In KB21N (activity allocation), system uses the exchange rate type you have maintained in controlling area version plan settings (transaction OKEQN). Activity allocation during the month always happen at the planned price maintained in KP26 at the exchange rate specified in plan version. During actual price calculation and revaluation during month end, it calculates actual activity price at (uses M rate to convert to controlling area currency) and revaluates consumption.
I think you cannot use other exchange rate, see the coding in include LKSPIF00 that is used in KSII where currency type is hard coded to M, if this is plan price calculation it's picking tka07-kurst.
Best Regards,
Venkata Ganesh Perumalla

Actual Price

HEllo all,
I want to know that if i do the costing run then it is the standard cost which includes BoM and activity costs
After monthend when i release the standard cost then it becomes actual i understand about the Bom cost but how the activity price is becomes actual price because in costing all the activity price is picked from KP26 plan price how it becomes actual .
Is from CON2 or any other transaction and when to run CON2.
Suggest
Edited by: Prem Kumar on Oct 7, 2009 11:48 AM

Through CK40n

How to get get PO Actual Price value in tocode me21n

hi there,
Do any one know how can we get the Actual price value from me21n ? Actual Value is the result value from condition type in ech po Item. Where can i can this value from what table ?
THanks

EKKO
Pick KNUMV
KONV comapre KNUMV then u can get all condition record values

Wrong actual price calculation

Dear Sap Experts
I'm running KSS2 to split costs into cost centers and getting a value of $ 12.461,66.
Volume of activities is 83,94, according S_ALR_87013611 and KSII.
Thing is that actual activity price given by the system is $ 151,56 and not $ 148,46 instead.
Some idea you could provide in order to investigate it?
Tks a lot, cheers
Patricia

Hi Sateesh,
Pls go through the following example to understand Plan Activity Price and Actual Activity Price:
For Cost Center A, you do Cost Element Planning in KP06 (Ex. Rs.1,00,000). In KP26, you do the planned Activity Quantity (100 Hrs) - you will not update any price in KP26 screen usually . Now, to calculate the Planned Activity Price, you use the transaction code KSPI. The gives the result of Planned Activity Price of Rs.1000 per Hr.
Now, when you confirm the activities in Production Order in CO11n, the activity cost on the Production Order is updated with the Planned Price of Rs.1000. So, by the end of the period, if total actual hrs confirmed is 60 Hrs. ie., total cost loaded onto Production Orders is Rs.60,000.
Now, think of the actual cost that is booked to the Cost Center A (either through FI postings or distribution / assessment from other cost centers). If the actual cost that was posted to that cost center is only Rs.84,000. (Where as Planned Cost was Rs.1,00,000).
Now, when you run KSII transaction code for actual activity price calculation, the system will calculate the actual activity price by 84,000 / 60 Hrs =1,333.33.
This is the way how the system clearly shows and takes care of Under-Absorption / Over-Absorption in cost centers.
Then you run the transaction code MFN1 / CON2 to revaluate your Production Orders with the Actual Price of Activity.
After alll these steps only, you need to settle the Production Orders.
If you settle Production Orders before revaluating with Actual Activity Price, then again there will be some loaded on to Production Orders, so, you have to do the settlement again.
Hope my explanation is clear...
cheers....
SRIKANTH MUNNALURI

Revaluation of actual prices

Dear experts,
Generally we do price calculation in KSII, that is standard price calculation. After planning in kp06 and kp26 we do this calculation. For actual confirmations also ( in CO11N ), we use the same price ( that means standard price whatever we calculated in KSPI ). But i have some doubt regarding actual price calculation. When we do actual price calculation in KSII? when we do actual price revaluation in CON2? what is the use of doing this one? At what point of time we do revaluation? immediately after doing confirmations? Please help me.
Regards
Jay

Hi Jay Jay,
Pls go through the following example to understand Plan Activity Price and Actual Activity Price:
For Cost Center A, you do Cost Element Planning in KP06 (Ex. Rs.1,00,000). In KP26, you do the planned Activity Quantity (100 Hrs) - you will not update any price in KP26 screen usually . Now, to calculate the Planned Activity Price, you use the transaction code KSPI. The gives the result of Planned Activity Price of Rs.1000 per Hr.
Now, when you confirm the activities in Production Order in CO11n, the activity cost on the Production Order is updated with the Planned Price of Rs.1000. So, by the end of the period, if total actual hrs confirmed is 60 Hrs. ie., total cost loaded onto Production Orders is Rs.60,000.
Now, think of the actual cost that is booked to the Cost Center A (either through FI postings or distribution / assessment from other cost centers). If the actual cost that was posted to that cost center is only Rs.84,000. (Where as Planned Cost was Rs.1,00,000).
Now, when you run KSII transaction code for actual activity price calculation, the system will calculate the actual activity price by 84,000 / 60 Hrs =1,333.33.
This is the way how the system clearly shows and takes care of Under-Absorption / Over-Absorption in cost centers.
Then you run the transaction code MFN1 / CON2 to revaluate your Production Orders with the Actual Price of Activity.
After alll these steps only, you need to settle the Production Orders. If you settle Production Orders before revaluating with Actual Activity Price, then again there will be some loaded on to Production Orders, so, you have to do the settlement again.
Revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Revaluation of Actual Prices error- CON1

Dear Experts,
Im getting below error when I execute CON1 ( Rev of Actual Prices)
Prior to the error , I maintained following settings for activity type and planned Prices.
Kindly let me know what addl config and actual data to be maintained for calculating actual prices
Currently I maintained Activity prices
In KL01 (14xx) - I maintained Activity Unit - Min
                                   Cctr Categories - "1" Production
                                   AType Category - "1"
                                   Allocation Co Element - 95xxxx ( category -43)
In KP26
Cost Center - 111xxx
Activity Type - 14xx
Dis "2"
Unit "MIN"
Planned Variable costs "100" Shillings
Error
Revaluation at actual prices not possible in version 0, fiscal year 2011
Message no. KI760
Diagnosis
A revaluation for actual prices is not possible since this function is not available in version 0 in fiscal year 2011.
Procedure
Maintain the corresponding indicator in your version.
Advance Thanks
Sanjai

Dear Experts,
Can someone explain me the procedure of CON1,
For Ex: Actual Activity Price of Direct Labour is say $12 per hour and the planned activity prices is say $10 per hour.
Query
1. Where these actual activity price of $12 per diriect labour hour is entered ? can the system calculate automatic actual prices? if yes what is the procedure
2. When CON1 is executed ,what is the entry that is posted to Product cost collector and the cost center .
Kindly let me have your inputs
Thanks
Sanjai

Actual price calculation for multiple activity types

Gurus,
I am working on a scenario where we have 2 main cost centers (A & B) from which services are used in different cost centers one of which is C. C is assigned to a work center. Now for the cost center C,two activity types are defined ATA and ATB which are actually the services from cost center A and B respectively.
Now for standard cost estimate I can define planned rates for those two activities based on the cost center C. Now at the month end I want to draw the costs from A and B based on the % of the services drawn by C and then calculate the actual price for those activities, i.e. run revaluation cycle. My question is, when I would run the revaluation cycle, how am I going to differentiate the cost of each activity types based on the cost input from respective cost centers (A and B) ?
I short, with more than one activity type and more than one input cost center, is it possible to valuate the activities on actual prices?
Thanks in advance!
Snigdho

Hi Snigdho
Yes, you can!!
If I have understood your question well - What you want is that the Cost allocated to From A to C should be divided by Act type ATA and cost allocated from B to C, should be divided by ATB, at the period end... Is that what you want?
You can achieve this in SAP...
1. Create 2 separate secondary cost elements for each Act Type ATA and ATB
2. Create a Spliting structure in OKES... You would assign Secondary cost ele 1 to ATA and Sec Cost ele 2 to ATB
Assign cost center C to this splitting structure in OKEW
3. now, when you calculate Act price, you will get what you want
Regards
Ajay M

Tcode CON2: Revaluation of Actual price

Dear Experts
At the time of running the transaction code CON2, it shows that "Processing completed with no errors",.
But a list should be generated for the revaluated items, which is not getting generated
kindly, help me out
Regards
Sudhir Poddar

Hi Jay Jay,
Pls go through the following example to understand Plan Activity Price and Actual Activity Price:
For Cost Center A, you do Cost Element Planning in KP06 (Ex. Rs.1,00,000). In KP26, you do the planned Activity Quantity (100 Hrs) - you will not update any price in KP26 screen usually . Now, to calculate the Planned Activity Price, you use the transaction code KSPI. The gives the result of Planned Activity Price of Rs.1000 per Hr.
Now, when you confirm the activities in Production Order in CO11n, the activity cost on the Production Order is updated with the Planned Price of Rs.1000. So, by the end of the period, if total actual hrs confirmed is 60 Hrs. ie., total cost loaded onto Production Orders is Rs.60,000.
Now, think of the actual cost that is booked to the Cost Center A (either through FI postings or distribution / assessment from other cost centers). If the actual cost that was posted to that cost center is only Rs.84,000. (Where as Planned Cost was Rs.1,00,000).
Now, when you run KSII transaction code for actual activity price calculation, the system will calculate the actual activity price by 84,000 / 60 Hrs =1,333.33.
This is the way how the system clearly shows and takes care of Under-Absorption / Over-Absorption in cost centers.
Then you run the transaction code MFN1 / CON2 to revaluate your Production Orders with the Actual Price of Activity.
After alll these steps only, you need to settle the Production Orders. If you settle Production Orders before revaluating with Actual Activity Price, then again there will be some loaded on to Production Orders, so, you have to do the settlement again.
Revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Do we have the report to show PO Price and invoice actual price

Dear Guru,
I'm finding the report to show PO Price and Actual Price after invoice.
The actual price is mean that we may have other debit/credit price as subsequent posting in MIRO.
So we would like to compare PO price and actual Price.
Please kindly advice.
Thank you very much.
Best Regards,
Saiya

Hi,
Please check ME81N --> Order value analysis.
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jul 22, 2010 6:05 PM

PO - Actual price report

Hello
Do we have any standard report which gives PO actual (Gross + Freight + any else....) price?
This also should include statistical condition amount?
Thanks

In PO -- Line item -- Condition tab, the value appears on the 'Actual Price' or Effective Price field which is same in EKPO - EFFWR.
Is there any standard report which prints PO number and relevant EFFWR value?

ML- Actual price release where

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for