MM02 changing planning strategy, MRP, and customer schedule aggrement

hello,
everybody.
Someone has told me that if I change in MM02, the strategy group for a material, I have to create another schedule agreemennt and delete ( invalidate ) the current. If not, MRP won't take care of the current schedule agreement and the customer demands.
Is there a way to modify the schedule agreement instead of re-create it.
Thanks a lot.
Romeo

if the req type is decided by stg group(check in procurement tab) and in case if it is not changing...then you can continue using the same or else you may have to create a new one.

Similar Messages

  • BAPI for customer scheduling aggrement (VA31)

    Hi,
    I want to create customer scheduling aggrement using BAPI, but i hav't find any BAPI for this.
    So please tell me is their any BAPI available to create scheduling aggrement.
    <REMOVED BY MODERATOR - REQUEST OR OFFER POINTS ARE FORBIDDEN>
    Thanks,
    Rahul
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Aug 22, 2008 4:21 PM

    Dear Jelena,
    'BAPI_SAG_CREATE' is used for creating Purchase Scheduling Agreement Tcode u2013 ME31L but my requirement is for creating customer scheduling agrrement Tcode - VA31.
    Pl. confirm is it possible to use the above BAPI for VA31 or not.
    Thanks,
    Rahul

  • Bapi For creation and change for Vendor Master and Customer Master

    I am looking for BAPI to create and change  Vendor Master and Customer Master which will not take me to standard SAP transaction but will work in the background
    Explanation: BAPI to delete material (BAPI_MATERIAL_DELETE) take you to standard SAP screen of T-Code MM06  but BAPI to create material (BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA) creates material in the background i.e. does not take you to standard SAP screen of T-Code MM01
    So in my case (i.e. to create and change  Vendor Master and Customer Master ) I want BAPI which would work like BAPI to create material (BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA)

    For general information,to find BAPIs associated with any business object :
    Transaction : BAPI - choose alphabetical tab - Find customer - (right side choose - tools - create bapi list and search ) , you will get all the BAPIs associated with this particular business  object
    Mathews

  • Regarding MRP and WIP scheduling differences

    One doubt is whether variable leadtime is used by both MRP as well as WIP scheduler. I have a feeling that it is being used by only MRP. The backward scheduling done by WIP scheduler always gives 3 times the days given by MRP . So if due date is say 3-jun-2002 for a particular item with quantity 100. MRP gives a start date of 27-May-2002 whereas WIP Scheduler gives a start date of 15-May-2002.I know that WIP is considering 8 hours as working time as defined in our workday calender but MRP is taking 24 hours as working time.Why is this so?

    I had been a little out of touch here but the difference is in the type of scheduling, WIP uses what is known as Detailed scheduling algorithm and hence the difference. Will get back to you after clearing the cob webs created by recent randezvous with COM/MTS. Hope this helps

  • Dependent requirements for Top level materials planned in MRP

    Hey Gurus,
    A top level material 20350 has a component 30397 and both of these materials are planned in APO.  We have another top level material 30399 (but this material is planned in MRP) and the component 30397 (is planned in APO) will the dependent requirements from material 30399 be populated in APO for material 30397?
    Sincerely,
    Kris

    Kris
    As Datta has mentioned the dependent demand will not reflect for the component material in APO. We had the same scenario as yours and this is what we did
    We modified the Planned order integration model filter criteria by adding custom logic in the BAdI CIF_INT_MODEL. The logic was to query the BOM tables in R/3 and find out all parents that have SNP relevant materials as components and include these parents in the list of materials for which planned orders are to be CIF'ed from R/3 . The BAdI will be invoked when you run the IM generation .
    You also have to CIF the BOM to APO . Once the PDS and planned orders are available in APO , the dependent demand will be created automatically. ( If you do not want to modify the BAdI then you can write a query and identify the parents and add them to the integration model manually)
    Thanks
    Saradha

  • Strategy group and other settings

    Hi all,
    If you are getting
    1. Custormer requirements for new product(in-house prod)
    2. Requirements from Project system for new product (in-house prod)
    and you may sell the same developed product over the counter lateron. Then what strategy or strategy group and other necessary settings would be needed for the new material.
    Thanks
    Shiva

    Hi,
    If you are producing against your customer reqmt, you can use the planning strategy as 20. Later you would like to sell this in your counter u can use planning strategy 10 and 40 also. In SAP the same material can be assigned up to 6 planning strategy. Based on the requirement class it will behave according to the planning strategy.
    Regards,
    V. Suresh

  • What is the workbench request and customizing request.

    can anybody explain what is workbench request and  what is customizing request.

    <b>Workbench Requests</b>
    When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
    Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
    Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
    <b>Customizing requests</b>
    Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
    Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
    Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.

  • What is the difference between workbench request and customizing request

    hi gurus
    can anyone suggest me
    what is the difference between
    workbench request and
    customizing request
    abaper ll work on which request
    thank you
    regards
    kals.

    A quick  search in the forum would have taken you to this answer
    Workbench Requests
    When you change a Repository object of the ABAP Workbench, a query window appears in which you need to specify a Workbench request. You can only save the changes if you have assigned the object to a change request.
    Workbench requests and the tasks assigned to them are normally used to record changes to Repository objects and Customizing for all clients. However, you can also include client-specific Customizing.
    Whether the changes to Repository objects are transported depends on whether a transport route is defined from the current SAP System for the package of these objects. From the system settings, the system automatically determines whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported.
    Customizing requests
    Customizing requests record client-specific Customizing settings made in a single client (the source client of the request).
    Automatic recording of configuration activities in the Customizing work for a client can be activated or deactivated for each client with Client Control. If automatic recording is active, a query window appears when you change Customizing settings, asking you to specify a Customizing request.
    Whether Customizing requests are transported or not, does not depend on the objects entered, as is the case with Workbench change requests. The Customizing requests in an SAP System (or in a client if you use Extended Transport Control) are either all transportable or all local, depending on the system setting. The system uses the standard transport layer to determine automatically whether the change requests are transportable and to which target system they should be transported. However, you can change this manually.

  • MRP exception message 64 and planning strategy group 52

    Hi Gurus,
    I have done extensive search online in the forum to find the route cause why we are getting MRP exception message 64 for a specific material in one of our plants. This exception message does not occur for the same materials which is also produced in another plant.
    I was just wondering whether the planning strategy group of 52 in MRP 3 view would have any effect on the frequent occurrence of exception message 64. I know that the 64 message occurs when the routing time is higher than the in house production time. If that's the case where to look for in routing to correct this, apart from this do we need to look at work centers and other details. I'm not a  PP person but still was curious to know see if i could take a shot at it.
    Also the MRP settings that we follow in the plant where this problem does not occur is NETCH, Create PR - 2, Schedule lines - 3, create MRP list - 1, Planning mode - 3, scheduling -2
    in the plant where the 64 message occurs quite often is Netch, Create PR -2, Schedule lines - 3, create MRP list - 1, planning mode - 1, Schdeduliing - 1
    I was  thinking do MRP settings and planning strategy group would have any impact on why we are getting the 64 wexception message
    Because of this 63 exception message, the downstream components are getting wrong signals.
    Thanks
    Ravi

    Hello Ravi
    Generallt, exception message "64 - Production finish after order finish" is triggered when the order start date is in the past and system automatically changes to forward scheduling to calculate the finish date.
    Note 1913017 explains how the order basic date is calculated and adjusted in case of forward scheduling, however, you are using strategy 52 and this is a very special scenario, whever VP planned orders are generated.
    The VP planned orders will always be adjusted to the requirements date even if the requirements date is in the past. This is a special feature in the planning segment, since these orders are only kind of 'virtual' planned orders. These orders only have to provide the demand requirements for the components in time.
    Therefore, there is a relationship between strategy 52 (VP planned order) and the exception message observed.
    BR
    Caetano

  • Schedule line date changes after each MRP run

    Dear Experts,
    Clarification needed on how the system plans the MM schedule lines.
    Setting: Start in the past not allowed.
                  3 days for processing of order
    The issue is after each MRP run the system is moving the schedule line to the current date + 3 days for processing + the planned delivery time.
    If the schedule line is not firmed, after each MRP run ( which happens everyday) the system is moving the schedule line and then giving an alert saying the " order has to be rescheduled to the previous day"
    on the second day after the mrp run the system moves the schedule line again by one more day and gives the rescheduling date as " -2 days from today"
    this change is happening every day after the planning run. - because of this there are really no backorders ( schedule line in the past ) in the system. we were not able to know if the vendor is actually delayed in this case.
    can you kindly suggest what went wrong here ??
    we are using strategy 10 for the planning of procured parts. Let me know if more info is needed.
    Note: we are also using stock transfer process for some procured parts. there too the PR date gets changed after each MRP run. There there is no lead time in this case. the order is placed on the same day as the requirement as both plants are nearby. There the PR date is changing everyday to the current date.
    your advice would be of great help
    thanks
    Nagendra Kumar

    Hi Caetano,
    thanks for your suggestion
    Yes, we use firm zone for few of the vendors. there the system don't change the schedule lines.
    Also for the stock transfer PR's there is no firm zone and the lead time is one day. in this case it changes everyday after the MRP run.
    the stock transfer PR's leads to the creation of Schedule lines from the source plant. Since this PR gets changed everyday. the alerts coming out of MD07 gets changed and we really did not know if this order is delayed or not.  In the source plant we use the firm zone to avoid moving the schedule line. But then the alerts are always not correct.
    is there any setting which helps in not moving the PR everyday without using " start in the past"
    thanks
    Nagendra Kumar

  • MRP exception handling for planning strategy 52

    Hi All,
            How to handing MRP exception in Mass? For example, header material having two sub assembly and 3 raw materials in it's BOM. As per planning strategy 52, we maintain PIR for finished part, if we run MRP planning will be generated with respect to Planned Independent Requirement(PIR). Now, the problem is the higher/upper level material planing date is lower than low level material, It means Semi finished material(SF2) planning date is for example ( 15 june 2014) at the same time another lower level semi finished material (SF1) planning date is (18 june 2014). In this case without completing SF1, we can't produce SF2 because SF1 is an component of SF2. In the same way, system will propose the planning info for all raw material/semi finished. How we will handle this exception in mass since we using more materials in shop floor.Hence, it's really hard to planner to adjust the planing date for each and every material wise. How to handle/adjust this MRP exception? How to make system to calculate dependent materials availability to calculate next level material's planning date (start,end)? We understand that we have to maintain proper master information like in-house production days, planned delivery date, Gr processing date etc., to get planning information. Apart from that how we handle or to get without this kind of exceptional message? Please suggest
    Thanks

    AKS,
    There is absolutely nothing wrong with having exception messages.  Expecting to be able to perform some mass transaction that will magically make all messages "go away" is unreasonable.  In any real life business, there will be new exception messages with every MRP run - sometimes thousands of them.
    These messages indicate that there is something the matter with the plan; but they don't really tell you what is the best way to fix the plan.  There may not be an easy way to fix this plan, it may actually require having your planners examine each PIR, trace down the BOM, and determine what is the best solution for that PIR.  Once you have decided what is wrong with your plan, then ask me what mass changes are available to fix THAT problem.
    Now, to your question.  If you want all the dates to line up, then allow dates in the past. Although this solution doesn't give you results that are any more realistic than your current solution, you will eliminate most of the exception message 10's; and, if all your master data is correct, most of the supply and demand dates should line up.  The messages will be replaced with a boatload of "new, and start date in the past" or similar.  You can allow MRP to create procurement proposals with start dates in the past by changing the appropriate settings in OPPQ and/or OPPR.  Also affected by scheduling parameters found in OPU5 and OPU3.
    This is a business decision.  Some planners prefer not to allow dates in the past.  Others just the opposite.  You (or the client, if you are a consultant) have to decide which is best for your company.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Can we change planning starategy 10 to strategy 40

    Hi Experts,
    We are using the repetitive manufacturing and planning strategy being used is 10, The requirement from client is that the sales orders should be considered along with Planned Independent Requirements Can we change the planning strategy to 40 ?.
    Is there any specific precautions to be taken while changing strategy 10 to starategy 40?
    Regards
    CS

    Dear CS,
    As explained by our other forum members,check the requirement type for the existing new sales order,ensure it's KSV.
    Instead it's better to make such changes in the month begining and also check for the consumption mode,forward and backward
    consumption period before taking MRP run.
    Check and revert
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • MRP Areas and Delivery schedules

    We have managed to succesfully configure MRP areas, however we still have problems of transferring the MRP results to Scheduling Agreement. We can only set source list at plant level. Now same plant has different MRP areas. Please help.

    Hi TAJUDDIN,
    Let me rephrase my quiry. We have a customer that sends requirements to us, which we then send through to MRP, which gives us the nett requirements, which are then sent to the supplier.
    We have been running this at plant level with no problem as the supplier was seeing all the requirements (from our customers/ subsidaries) consolidated. But now this requirements must be passed to the supplier per individual customer or subsidaries. For implementing this we created a new plant with storage Locations representing each subsidary, each subsidary has to be planned separately and handed to the supplier as individual requirements.
    Hence we looked at MRP areas for this, the other option was to create each subsidary as a SAP plant but this is not neat. Our problem is that we are able to plan with MRP areas but we are unable to pass the MRP results to the agreement that we have with the supplier.
    JUst though to give more infor of the full scenario might help, but in short you've been very helpful. I've learnt quite a lot.
    I hope you'll still be patient with me while I try and understand as well as address the current issue we have.
    Thanks.

  • HT5622 I have been using one apple ID for my family as it makes it easier to manage itunes purchases/rentals on all of our devices.  Now that my kids are getting old and my wife has recently purchased an Iphone, I can see that I need to change my strategy

    I have been using one apple ID for my family as it makes it easier to manage itunes purchases/rentals on all of our devices.  Now that my kids are getting old and my wife has recently purchased an Iphone, I can see that I need to change my strategy. I plan to add a few more iphones to the family very soon.  What is your recommendation to manage all of our devices (iphones, itouch, apple tv) for my family?  Can I continue to function with one apple ID or is it time to take the leep into attempting to manage multi-apple ID's? 

    There's a few ways of managing multiple devices on a single computer (and keeping seperate content on each). The following document is worth checking through:
    How to use multiple iPods, iPads, or iPhones with one computer

  • Link between process order and sales order for planning strategy 52

    Hello,
    I investigate the possibility of a link between "sales order" and "planned order / process order" for the usage of planning strategy 52 (planning w/o final assembly, make to stock).
    I know, this is not conform to the basics of planning strategies (EITHER make to order OR make to stock) and I suspect it would be a modification. Of course we have the alternative "make to order" - strategy 50, but we do not want to use individual customer stocks.
    Is anybody there with similar customer requirements or project experiences?
    Thanks in advance,
    Joerg
    Message was edited by:
            Jörg Demtschuk

    Hi Jorg,
    To my understanding if you need hard pegging then in SAP only Individual requirement is possible.
    Or else you need to create a custom transactions/table to identify Sale order and when ever a process order is created by selecting the sale order record, the process order detials should also get updated against that.
    You need to take the help of ABAP expert for this,
    Regards,
    Prasobh
    Reward points if this was useful

Maybe you are looking for