MobileMe Gallery - allowing multiple users access

Hi,
I have a simple question - can allow more than one user access to a hidden MobileMe Gallery?
I seem to be able to choose only one name from a drop-down list. I'd like to allow two people access to my gallery. Is this possible?
Thanks,
:-Joe

Joe:
Give the same name and password to both viewers.
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. Just put the application in the Dock and click on it whenever you want to backup the dB file. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
Note: There's now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

Similar Messages

Allow multiple users access to iphoto

I would like to allow multiple users on same computer to access Iphoto files. What setting changes need to be made?
Thanks
mfandml

iPhoto: Sharing libraries among multiple users...
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1198

With iTunes on an external hard drive can I allow multiple users access?

I keep my iTunes library on my time capsule since it is far to large to keep on my hard drive. We have always had only one user account. Now that my daughter is onl enough to use the computer on her own I set up her own account so that I could enact parental controls, but I noticed her iTunes is empty. Can I have it access the library on the time capsule. If I do this do I run the risk of her deleting files? If I let her create her own library isn't it just a bunch of duplicate files eating up space? Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks !

PhoenixR wrote:
If I do this do I run the risk of her deleting files?
yes.
If I let her create her own library isn't it just a bunch of duplicate files eating up space?
yes, but it would be safer.

How to allow multiple users login to a MAC PRO without interruption?

I have a mac pro, which runs Yosemite, (2013 module) to be used as a server. However, I have difficult to let multiple users to use the mac simultaneously.
Objective:
    One person uses the mac directly on his desktop, while the others to login remotely though VNC from PC (win 7/Linux).
    The users have their own workspace, and they will not interrupt each other.
What I tried:
    I created two mange accounts on the MAC.
    Account 1 was used to directly login on the mac desktop.
    Account 2 was used to login to the mac from a PC though VNC. (I also tried this from a Centos workstation with the Tiger VNC viewer)
Problem:
When account 2 is login, the location monitor will automatically change to that account as well. Both accounts shared exactly the same screen, mouse & keyboard actions. It is impossible to let multiple users to use the MAC pro simultaneously without interruptions.
If I use "hdiutil attach" to mount a dmg file though SSH with account 2, the folder will automatically show in the local desktop login with account 1.
Question:
I read something about the "Per-user screen sharing". It says, "You can remotely log into a Mac with any user account on that computer and control it, without interrupting someone else who might be using the computer under a different login." Is it possible to do this from a PC or Linux client?
If the problem is simply due to the poor functionality of the build-in VNC service in Yosemite, I appreciate your help to suggest some other decent VNC server for Yosemite. I know the Vine Server (OSXvnc), but I failed to install it on the mac because it is incompatible with the Yosemite.
Does the SSH is supposed to work in this way in OSX? I mean the local account can see the folder mounted by another account though SSH.
If any specific version of Yosemite is required to allow multiple users to access a mac simultaneously? Just as the win 7 professional allow only one user to login in at each time. But with the remote desktop server of windows, multiple users are able to use the same computer at the same time without any problem.
If you familiar with any of the above questions, please help. Any comments and suggestions are appreciated.
I know the best way to get the solution is to direct call the apple support. However, it is really not easy to call them. Because it always results with long waiting time and then the people pick up the phone will transfer my call to an expert who will make me to describe the problem again.
Since I'm not interested in the technique details of all the problems, it is also grateful if you would provide a direct instruction to let me setup the computer for the purpose.
Thanks you very much for your kindly help.

I cannot help with the screen sharing, although I have just tried it with a RealVNC client on an iPad and it seemed to work OK.
However on the disk showing on all users desk tops have you unchecked the "ignore ownership on this volume" check box? You can check the drives permissions with CMD i command.

ARCA Xtra - multiple user access to SQLite DB

Hi Guys,
I have having trouble with multiple users accessing a SQLite DB file from a projector. They can all open and browse the data through the projector fine, but if USER1 makes a change and clicks save, and then USER2 tries access the DB it causes USER2 to get a script error.
Is it possible to write a script which tells the user that the DB is being modified so please wait, rather than throwing them out of the projector with a script error
Thankyou

If you want multiple users to access a database then you would probably be better off using one designed for that purpose like MySQL.
But, if you are set on SQLite and if you can have multiple simultaneous connections which you seem to imply you can, then the best solution I can think of is to create a Class/Script that handles all the details of polling the database for availability and handles other issues like a progress dialogue box.
You have to treat the database as an asynchronous action - meaning you send it a query and at some latter time it sends a result back via a callback. Doing it this way greatly simplifies any database queries you want to make. As long as your queries are fairly simple like SELECT, INSERT, DELETE, etc. then the code is fairly straight forward.
Off the top of my head I wrote something to get you started. I have not tested this code but it does compile. The following is a Parent script that you would use to interface to your database in an asynchronous manner.
-- Asynchronus SQLite
property pDB -- instance of Arca xtra
property pTimeoutTime -- how long in milliseconds to ping database
property pPingTime -- time between database pings.
property RunningQuery -- Boolean. is a query running? true/false
property pTimeOb -- timout object for polling the database
property pCurOperation -- set of data for current query
property pPingCount -- how many times the current query has pinged the database
property pAlertBox -- a MIAW, LDM, or a Sprite that informs the user as to the progress of the query.
on new me
arcaregister([0000,000,0000])
pDB = xtra("arca").new()
Result = pDB.openDB(the moviepath & "ST_data")
if Result.errorMsg then
    alert("Error Opening Database" & return & pDB.explainError(Result.errorMsg))
    return void
end if
pTimeoutTime = 10000
pPingTime = 250
RunningQuery = false
pAlertBox = Sprite(1000) -- for example
return me
end new
on cleanup me
pDB.closeDB()
end cleanup
on executeSQL me, Query, CallbackOb, CallbackMethod, OptionalParameters
if RunningQuery then exit -- only allow one query at a time
RunningQuery = True
pCurOperation = [#Query:Query, #OptionalParameters:OptionalParameters, #CallbackOb:CallbackOb, #CallbackMethod:CallbackMethod]
pPingCount = 0
pTimeOb = timeout().new("QueryProcessor_"&me, 1, me, #processQuery) -- creating the timeout object here breaks the call stack, which is good.
end executeSQL
on processQuery me, TimeOb
Result = pDB.executeSQL(pCurOperation.Query, pCurOperation.OptionalParameters)
if Result.errorMsg then
    if Result.errorMsg = 5 then -- database is currently locked
      pPingCount = pPingCount + 1
      if pPingCount = 1 then -- then inform user there will be a delay.
        pAlertBox.setMessage("Waiting for database response.")
        pAlertBox.setProgress(0)
        pAlertBox.show()
        pTimeOb.period = pPingTime
        exit
      end if
      pAlertBox.setProgress((pPingCount * pPingTime / pTimeoutTime) * 100 )
      if pPingCount * pPingTime = pTimeoutTime then -- timed out
        alert("Query Timed out.")
      else
        exit -- try again in pPingTime time.
      end if
    else -- there is some sort of database error
      alert("Database Error: " & return & pDB.explainError(Result.errorMsg))
    end if
else -- no query errors
    call(pCurOperation.CallbackMethod, pCurOperation.CallbackOb, Result)
end if
-- if the code makes it this far then we are done and need to clean things up
if pTimeOb. objectP then
    pTimeOb.forget()
    pTimeOb = void
end if
pAlertBox.hide()
RunningQuery = false
end processQuery
on setTimeOutTime me, MilliSecs
pTimeoutTime = MilliSecs
end setTimeOutTime
on setPingTime me, MilliSecs
pPingTime = MilliSecs
end setPingTime
You then create an instance of this script on preparemovie.
-- Movie script
global gDB
on prepareMovie
gDB = script("Asynchronus SQLite").new()
if gDB.voidP then halt -- can not connect to the database
end
on stopMovie
gDB.cleanup()
end
Then it is simply a matter of sending your queries to the gDB object and it will send the results back to the callback handler and object that you specify. Here's a behavior that shows how simple this should be:
-- Sample DB Behavior
global gDB
on mouseUp me
Query = "select * from users"
gDB.executeSQL(Query, me, #setQueryResult) -- string, callback object, callback handler name
end
on setQueryResult me, Result -- this is the callback handler/method
put Result
end
I also suggest using a MIAW or a LDM or a set of sprites as a way to inform the user of any delays in processing a query. Check the code for pAlertBox to see how I use this idea to update a progress bar. Of course you will have to create the implementation.

Way to allow the user access to the saved lists of this Z report

We have a Z report that we want to run at midnight each Sunday and then view the output/layout first thing Monday morning. We can schedule the report to run but it appears that the only way we can save the output as a 'file' for later viewing is by using the "Save with ID" option, which puts the output into a SAP 'saved list'.
The problem with this is that it doesn't appear to be possible to access that list from the Z-report - it would appear that you have to go into SQ01 and use the 'saved list' button. This means giving the Z- report user access to SQ01 as well as Z-report, which, for security (SOD) reasons we don't want to do.
We can run the report in foreground with the output option "File store" and save the output as a file to a specified location,. But this option doesn't appear to be available when the report is scheduled as a background job. If this is done, the background job runs but there's no output anywhere, as far as we can tell.
So what want is to run the report in background but with the output option 'File store' or equivalent (i.e. an output stored somewhere that the report user can view). Is this not possible, or have we missed something in setting up the report run?
Or is there a way to allow the user access to the saved lists of this Z report without giving them T-code SQ01?
Thanks

Hi !
I just wonder if the answer from Varishtb below did solve your propblem.
I have exactly the same problem as you. I also want to be able to look at the saved list without using the sq01.
If you solved it I will be grateful to get the solution.
regards Lars
answer:
You can call the infoset query directly from a transaction code. There's
no need to copy it as a 'Z-report' (or as a custom report). In fact,
everytime you're copying an infoset query to a report, you're calling
for problems the next time you face an upgrade. (That is because SAP
changes the internal logic used to handle the infosets queries from
version to version)
We're using some infoset queries and they work fine this way.

How can I allow multiple users to edit a single shared iCal calendar?

Is it possible to allow multiple users to edit a single shared iCal calendar? I also want to provide different permissions to those users. Is this possible through .MAC? Is it possible on Mac OSX Server?

I would like 2 agenda synced through .Mac but it does not work.
I have 2 computers and 2 laptops. A very simple agenda with 3 calenders. Myself my partner and the office calender. I want to publish my calender and that of my partner. The office calender I would like to sync so that we can change the office calender at any location.
I set up sync only for iCall and have a .Mac account. When I change anything on any of the calenders in iCall nothing happens on any of my other locations. Even though the locations are registered as synced. I can see the sync wheel turning but at the end of it the calenders are not synced.
At this moment I fully understand the publish and unpublished calenders but have no clue what so ever what syncing does for iCall. There seems to be no functionality to it. It does not transport any calender info over .Mac. There is no visable check to see what is happening and the process of syncing is not transperent. Lots of my friends go to me for advise on Apple issues but as far as sync wether iCall or Addressbook I always tell them sync does not work and I have no clue why others have it working. I haven't met any people here in Holland either that got in working. I suppose with iCall you have to get third party software to share calenders editable calenders. Really hopeless situation, wish Apple would just have a manual stating what sync can do and what it can not. Hours wasted on this issue trying to get it to work.
Hope anyone here can help out.

Allowing multiple users on one Skype ID

I was wondering if allowing multiple users online one Skype ID is possible, I currently run a small business, where the majority of the customers use skype just for text chatting, not the call features.
I was looking to hire employees, but use the same skype thats associated with my current reputation. It also helps when I get return customers, since it'll be available to all workers.
The last 2 times I tried setting this up, my skype got locked, and I wouldn't be able to afford for it to get locked.
I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions about the feasibility of this.

Being doing this idea for years and really was hoping for more development.
Bottomline when a call comes in and either I answer the call or let my staff answer the call. Then later i can see what happened.
Unfortunity each new call is not populating outlook with an automactic new record so notes could be made.
Currently we name the client with notes on back end eg: John Smith ..wants to buy main street call back asap.
This is crazy way to make notes on incoming calls but there no was to conert to a task or an appointment.... One day .....i can only dream.

Compiz starting with GDM allowing multiple users

When i start compiz after login I've got slow GDM when changing user and
white screen after second login.
So there's no way to launch compiz and support two different sessions?
Or can I start compiz together with gdm and not individually for each user?

RAGHAVENDRA HARI N wrote:
Allowing multiple users to receive Ibot in OBIEE-11g with out specifying email addresses.
How to use S A System subject area in OBIEE-11g
How to specify condition in Ibot of OBIEE-11GYou can use the SA System subject area after you set it up by following the documentation link provided below. It could be used in OBIEE Delivers which enables contact information, such as e-mail addresses to be retrieved from a database and used as delivery devices in Delivers instead of having the user's manually setup their own delivery device.
Here is the link to the documentation on how to setup SA system subject area in OBIEE 11g:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14571_01/bi.1111/e10541/sa_system.htm
You can set the condition in the condition tab which is the 3rd one I suppose.

Allowing multiple users to receive Ibot in OBIEE-11g

Allowing multiple users to receive Ibot in OBIEE-11g with out specifying email addresses.
How to use S A System subject area in OBIEE-11g
How to specify condition in Ibot of OBIEE-11G

RAGHAVENDRA HARI N wrote:
Allowing multiple users to receive Ibot in OBIEE-11g with out specifying email addresses.
How to use S A System subject area in OBIEE-11g
How to specify condition in Ibot of OBIEE-11GYou can use the SA System subject area after you set it up by following the documentation link provided below. It could be used in OBIEE Delivers which enables contact information, such as e-mail addresses to be retrieved from a database and used as delivery devices in Delivers instead of having the user's manually setup their own delivery device.
Here is the link to the documentation on how to setup SA system subject area in OBIEE 11g:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14571_01/bi.1111/e10541/sa_system.htm
You can set the condition in the condition tab which is the 3rd one I suppose.

Multiple User access in ATP

I am designing custom ATP for our client. Actually, this logic accesses batch classification data and the calculation logic also differs.
The concern that I have is if one user (say A) creates a sales order item and runs a successful Availability check and goes on to create second sales order item. simultaneously if another user (say B) comes to create new sales order item for same material. now the ATP quantity that second user gets should be less than the quantity confirmed by user A. But both the sales order have not been saved. so how do I block the quantities confirmed by A but yet not saved.
Is there any special method for multiple user access at runtime.

Thanks for ur reply. it was really helpful to gain more insights in my issue.
1. For performance-related reasons, the only time when it makes sense to set the material block with quantity transfer is when it is common for several users to work on the same material simultaneously. And in VA01 there are many parallel Sales order creation
2.You create a sales order for a material. During the availability check, this material is blocked. After the availability check is completed, the block is removed. The quantity reserved for this transaction is recorded in the blocking table. This information can be assessed by all others who are working with this material. If you save the order, the blocked entries are cancelled. this how Material block with quantity transfer in SD works.
The concern that I have now is how to get Blocking Tables for transaction VA01.

ChaRM Allowing Multiple Users in the Same CD to be in Edit Mode

We have upgraded to ChaRM 7.1 but are still using CRMD_ORDER and Transaction Monitor CRM_DNO_MONITOR. When the Developer completes her change, populates the Current Processor with the Change Manager and clicks Save she keeps the CD open in Edit Mode. The Change Manager is able to open the same CD and click Edit without any warning on the bottom of the window saying it is being processed by another user.
When there is a hand off to the next Current Processor, both the previous and current user are able to be in edit mode. I don't recall this being allowed before. Has this changed with 7.1?

DGS wrote:
I have a global temp table (GTT) defined with 'on commit preserve rows'. This table is accessed via a web page using ASP.NET. The application was designed so that every one that accessed the web page could only see their data in the GTT.
We have just realized that the GTT doesn't appear to be empty as new web users use the application. I believe it has something to do with how ASP is connecting to the database. I only see one entry in the V$SESSION view even when multiple users are using the web page. I believe this single V$SESSION entry is causing only one GTT to be available at a time. Each user is inserting into / selecting out of the same GTT and their results are wrong.
I'm the back end Oracle developer at this place and I'm having difficulty translating this issue to the front end ASP team. When this web page is accessed, I need it to start a new session, not reuse an existing session. I want to keep the same connection, but just start a new session... Now I'm losing it.. Like I said, I'm the back end guy and all this web/connection/pooling front end stuff is magic to me.
The GTT isn't going to work unless we get new sessions. How do we do this?
Thanks!You may want to try changing your GTT to 'ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS' and have the .Net app use a transaction object.
We had a similar problem and I found help in the following thread:
Re: Global temp table problem w/ODP?
All the best.

How to avoid multiple users accessing same test data via parameterization in LR??

i am using LR11.5, i have the following test data&colon;
TestData
1
2
3
4
5
when i run this script from Controller with 3 users LR picks it as user1->1, user2->1, user3->1
How do i achieve this case: user1->1, user2->2, user3->3 ??
Any help would be great.

I have a related question. i created 2 websites/domains then i went to users and created 2 seperate "network" users then i went to ftp and selected each website and added only user A to site A and user B to site B. what's weird is that when i try to ftp using either of the users it seems to land on the same site. i looked at shared security for the folders and it only shows user a on site a folder and user b on site b folders. am i doing somehitng wrong or is this how it works in mountain lion server? i just want to give the domain owner ftp access so they can manage their files and only thier files. i also had to turn on open directory so that it would not create a local user but a network user. do i need to turn that off and just deal with having a bunch of local users as ftp user? i want to host multiple websites on the server and NO users remote on to server besides ftp.
edit 1: i only have 1 IP running on the server which i don't think it has any affect on this but thought i mention it :-)
edit 2: i just noticed one more thing that may help. i used filezilla to remote in using both users, one at a time. it seems to allow both users in but then it shows same directories. i then created a file using the one that was not supposed to have acces and it never sows up. but if i remote desktop to server i can see the new file in the correct folder. so it may have something to d o with the directory listing.

How to setup for multiple users accessing same share?

Hi!
Recently picked up Mac Mini Server and have some configuration questions related to sharing files & information over the internet. Whenever possible, prefer to use the built-in features & tools, not 3rd party tools.
My setup & needs are this:
- Have folders & sub-folders with files to share.
- Wish to give individuals access to the shared folders, each with their own account (and access logging).
- Shared folder and files should be visible via web to authenticated users only (so no special client or setup is needed).
Right now, have added a Website via Server.app that points to the folder with files to share, and that works somewhat, but doesn't support individual user accounts separately?
Thought maybe to setup VPN but that seems like massive overkill for this (and is a pain in the butt for non-technical users to setup).
Editing httpd.conf for user support is a possibility, but seems /etc/apache2/httpd.conf only applies to the default web server (on port 80) not the one i set up in Server.app?
Can anyone recommend the best approach, given the above needs?

I have a related question. i created 2 websites/domains then i went to users and created 2 seperate "network" users then i went to ftp and selected each website and added only user A to site A and user B to site B. what's weird is that when i try to ftp using either of the users it seems to land on the same site. i looked at shared security for the folders and it only shows user a on site a folder and user b on site b folders. am i doing somehitng wrong or is this how it works in mountain lion server? i just want to give the domain owner ftp access so they can manage their files and only thier files. i also had to turn on open directory so that it would not create a local user but a network user. do i need to turn that off and just deal with having a bunch of local users as ftp user? i want to host multiple websites on the server and NO users remote on to server besides ftp.
edit 1: i only have 1 IP running on the server which i don't think it has any affect on this but thought i mention it :-)
edit 2: i just noticed one more thing that may help. i used filezilla to remote in using both users, one at a time. it seems to allow both users in but then it shows same directories. i then created a file using the one that was not supposed to have acces and it never sows up. but if i remote desktop to server i can see the new file in the correct folder. so it may have something to d o with the directory listing.

How to work with multiple users accessing one database

I am a newbie in oracle.
I want to give access to my oracle database for more users.
I created oracle connection with c# project. The application allow to user to insert data to a database table. Now I want to give access to the different users with a login. Is there any way to give access other users to the same database using their username and passwords?
I'm confused. Please help.
thank you.

In the database, set up your data schema with data tables, views, and stored procedures to support your application.
That schema owner should only be a trusted data administration person. Let's call that schema APP_DATA.
Then you set up another schema called APP_DATA_USERS with no privileges and no data.
Then you create an Oracle ROLE object called APP_DATA_ROLE.
You grant the app_data_role to the app_data_user account.
You then grant object permissions in the APP_DATA_ROLE that you want the app_data_user to have for the app_data data objects, like Create SESSION, SELECT on TABLE X. or SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE on TABLE Y.
Now the APP_DATA_USERS only has specific permissions needed on specific app_data data objects that you control by the app_data_role.
Then your application only opens connections to Oracle via the single APP_DATA_USERS account
which is constrained by the APP_DATA_ROLE permissions on what can be done in the data schema APP_DATA.
in your web or app config you create the connection information for the single app_data_user account.
Putting the database aside, you now create the application layer with login controls so many users can use the application.
But when they need data, the application only makes a connection to the single APP_DATA_USERS account
Oracle ODP.NET auto handles the multiple session connections by the multiple application users to the single APP_DATA_USERS account.
In summary the multiuser access is controlled by the application
all making connections (sessions) with a single, limited privilege app_data_user account on the database side.

MobileMe Gallery - allowing multiple users access

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for