Mount NTFS volumes in Solaris 10 update 8

Hi All,
I have a requirement to mount a windows share to two different Solaris 10 update 8 hosts . The below are the steps that i have done for the same but it got failed .
Please suggest a procedure and solution .
1 . Created the network share named " csv_source " on windows 2008 server . The share is given permission to everyone full access
2 . I have enabled the samba service on solaris server
3 . Created a directory on solaris server using mkdir /data
4 . Used the " mount " command to mount the volume but its failed .

Can you boot from DVD and do an "upgrade?"

Similar Messages

Mount FAT volume in Solaris-HOWTO

Can I mount an FAT partation in Solaris 8 like what I do under linux? How to?
I've got a multi-system.

Solaris' pcfs can do that. See "man mount_pcfs" for
examples.

Cannout Mount NTFS volume, any help appreciated

Output of fdisk -l:
Disk /dev/sdd: 16.2 GB, 16236150784 bytes, 31711232 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x713c9f02
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 * 0 1026047 513024 17 Hidden HPFS/NTFS
Disk /dev/sdd1: 525 MB, 525336576 bytes, 1026048 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x713c9f02
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1p1 * 0 1026047 513024 17 Hidden HPFS/NTFS
Output of mount -t ntfs-3g /dev/sdd1 /mnt/rem0:
NTFS signature is missing.
Failed to mount '/dev/sdd1': Invalid argument
The device '/dev/sdd1' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS.
Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a
partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around?
Output of gdisk -l /dev/sda:
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.6
Partition table scan:
MBR: MBR only
BSD: not present
APM: not present
GPT: not present
Found invalid GPT and valid MBR; converting MBR to GPT format.
Warning! Main partition table overlaps the first partition by 34 blocks!
You will need to delete this partition or resize it in another utility.
Disk /dev/sdd: 31711232 sectors, 15.1 GiB
Logical sector size: 512 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): 6AC5FE22-E915-4300-BB43-ED862EC1D97F
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 31711198
Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
Total free space is 30685151 sectors (14.6 GiB)
Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name

Slax wrote:
Output of fdisk -l:
Disk /dev/sdd: 16.2 GB, 16236150784 bytes, 31711232 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x713c9f02
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 * 0 1026047 513024 17 Hidden HPFS/NTFS
Disk /dev/sdd1: 525 MB, 525336576 bytes, 1026048 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x713c9f02
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1p1 * 0 1026047 513024 17 Hidden HPFS/NTFS
That looks like some very strange windows magic, maybe this might help: http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-978058.html

Can't mount LUKS volume after recent update

Booted up today to kernel error message involving the crypto parameter not being set and there not being a valid LUKS volume. Right I think, massive amounts of cock are about to ensue in a typical Linux update with half the system breaking, but nothing we haven't seen before.
So I boot from a recovery CD, get into the encrypted volumes and update to see if anything b0rked was hotfixed by the devs. Hmm, nothing. It would appear that the cryptsetup params have changed once again, as they are wont to do every few years. We now have a new parameter that must be specified, crypto=:::: by default. Default doesn't work for me since I must have been in a highly delusional paranoid state when I created my partitions I think I used AES when I created it, with TripleDES/Blowfish/Serpent or something along those lines.
I can't seem to find any documentation about the parameter either, the cryptsetup website looks like monkeys with hammers got to it before the devs could fend them off and now the devs are lying on the floor in puddles of monkey semen while their SVN is being pillaged
Does anyone have a quick hint of what needs to be specified to get back into my encrypted root? I don't feel like dredging through half the Internets again, last time it took me a half a day to find out I needed to add the cryptdevice parameter

It would seem the cryptsetup in the initrd image is borked. When it fails to unlock the root partition, it dumps me into the recovery terminal. When I try and run cryptsetup manually from there, it segfaults with the message that it is missing libpopt.so.
I tried with the crypto=ripemd160:"aes-cbc-essiv:sha256":128:1032: parameter (which has to be specified after the cryptdevice= but before the root= parameters - thanks for documenting that ). These parameters are correct for my partition and should unlock it, but fails because cryptsetup is linked against libpopt.so. WTF is that? You'd want a statically linked cryptsetup for your initrd. Who was smoking crack when they wrote the mkinitcpio script? I'm not even sure I need the crypto flag if cryptsetup runs properly.

How can i write on ntfs volume ?

Can you help me to mount ntfs volume in R/W.
Thank you!

But if one day Apple add support of ntfs write
I seriously doubt Apple will ever do that. It isn't worth their time to put that much development into supporting NTFS write capability.
Paragon went through Microsoft's validation testing and approved it.
Note that I already stated NTFS-3G is free. Also note that there are two different versions of NTFS-3G on the page I linked to. Tuxera NTFS is not free, but is twice as fast as the free version towards the bottom of the page. Both support 64 or 32 bit OS X startup.

Mounting NTFS on Solaris 10

How can i munt the NTFS partition of my Windows XP on Solaris 10?
Can somebody help me????
It can be possible?

Package FSWmisc now mounts NTFS partitions directly. No special mount_ntfs program required. It is based on Martin Rosenau's mount_ntfs. Package FSWpart comes with prtpart, which displays all the partitions, including extended partitions, and partition types.
See http://www.genunix.org/distributions/belenix_site/binfiles/README.FSWfsmisc.txt
Download from http://www.belenix.org/binfiles/FSWpart.tar.gz and http://www.belenix.org/binfiles/FSWfsmisc.tar.gz
Install with pkgadd -d . (in the directory you unpacked the above two tarballs).
Here's a sample /etc/vfstab line:
/dev/dsk/c0d0p1     -     /c     ntfs     -     no     roAnd sample output from mount and xlsmounts:
# mount
/c on 127.0.0.1:/ remote/read only/setuid/devices/port=33249/public/vers=2/proto=udp/xattr/dev=4700004 on Sun Nov 26 19:42:29 2006
# xlsmounts
PHYSICAL DEVICE                 LOGICAL DEVICE      FS    PID         ADDR Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c0d0p1                /dev/dsk/c0d0p1    ntfs   3354 127.0.0.1:/ /cAlso both mount_ntfs and FSWfsmisc work with Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris ("Nevada").

Mount NTFS under Solaris 10

Hi can anybody tell me if i can mount a NTFS partition under Solaris 10??
Thanks for ur help.

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>korsabad wrote on Wed, 11 January 2006 06:23</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
if you use solaris x86 and the ntfs-partition
Not possible. NTFS has those windows-security-id's (you know, those about-40-character-long-id's) for each object which cannot be read from solaris.
</td></tr></table>
I think writing to NTFS is nearly impossible (due to changes of the NTFS version, security stuff, and so on).
However reading from an <u>unencrypted</u> NTFS partition seems to be a possible thing. I do not know if a tool or a driver <u>already</u> exists but I think it is a possible task to write a tool that reads from NTFS partitions.
I think writing a tool that reads from UFS partitions under Windows is an easy task, too. I wrote such a tool for reading the EXT2 file system under Windows long time ago.
Martin

Writing to a NTFS volume

Dear all,
a month ago I bought an external drive (WD - My Passport) to store my iPhoto library as it was taking too much disk space. Although I've read that Snow Leopard does not provide default writing capabilities for NTFS, everything worked fine since a week ago, when I suddenly noticed that the volume apparently lost its writing permissions.
I've seen a bunch of references talking about changing the fstab, but diskutil is not providing me any UUID! I've also seen that some people solves this problem with NTFS-3G, but I've it looks like it does not support 10.6.
Any hint on that? Since then I cannot update my iPhoto library and is being really annoying!
Cheers

No offense, but I could never get it to work reliably for me. I admit I have not used it for almost a
year (since 10.5.x). It would work acceptably at times, but other times it would be slow as molasses
(copying files) or Finder would be lock up. Sometimes when copying from NTFS volumes OS X would
lock up tight and the only way out was to cut the power. I noticed the problems would surface
mostly when some other Mac Fuse dependent programs were being run at the same time (such
as Parallels Desktop).
To be fair though, I suspect the Apple 10.5.x Hard disk driver (for my machine) as being partly to
blame as most of the external disk mounting and lockup problems disappeared when I upgraded
to Snow Leopard.
I suspect Mac Fuse also. I have had various versions of Mac Fuse that didn't work well on my
machine either. When I first put Snow Leopard on my machine I had to use Tomas Carnecky's
compiled version of MacFuse 2.1.7. to get True Crypt working. Now they updated True Crypt and
I have had to use the new Public 2.1.5 Beta version of Mac Fuse to get the updated True Crypt
working.
Being a software developer I am sure you are aware of the endless problems various hardware
combinations and configurations can dish out. No offense, but I had to switch to Paragon NTFS
to be able to get a solution that worked reliably on my machine.
Some folks use your NTFS-3G product without any problems whatsoever, but like I said,
different hardware combos yield different results.
I have not tried Tuxera, actually I had not even heard of it until a couple of days ago.
The name is cute, how (if you don't mind telling) or who, came up with the label?
Linus Torvolds and that familiar Penguin comes to mind when I here the name.
It's not because NTFS-3G is free, that I don't use it.
I am a die hard "free" fan, I love "free", as in free lunch, free software, free money and of course
free BEER!
Kj ♘

No longer mount NFS volumes with 2010.q1 release:

Has anyone else seen this? I can no longer mount any of my NFS volumes with root squash since upgrading to 2010.q1. I have a ticket open with Sun (72644622), but everyone is apparently off/away.
Before they all went off, Sun Eng. suggested setting max supported NFS version to 3, but this of course did not work. Hosts trying to mount the volumes error out with:
call_verify: server HOST_IP_HERE requires stronger authentication.
I have double checked that the atuh is set to sys (not krb), but it looks like the nfsd is not respecting this.
Of course this has knocked all our VMware mounts offline as well, and using krb for these is out of the question....
Had to update to support the new FC card...which works great...but me needs me nfs shares....
Fishworks doods, stop yelling at drives and help a brother out ;)

I wish I could tell you, but it seems we lost a CIM card. Worse yet, this failure was completely SILENT. Not a single "problem" listed in the logs. However, when attaching another J4400, I noticed an alarm LED on the failed CIM and verified that the storage was only seen by 1 path. Kind of disconcerting that availability could be reduced significantly without so much as an email.
I'll let you know if we can get to the new release later this week.
Charles

ZFS tries to mount SAN volume before ISCSI is running

I am running Solaris 10 x86 U7. It is actually a VMWare guest (ESX4) on a Sun X4170 server- although I do not believe that that is relevant. I have a Sun 2510 iSCSI SAN appliance. I have an iSCSI volume with a ZFS Pool that is mounted on the server. All was fine until yesterday when I installed the following patches:
142934-02 SunOS 5.10_x86: failsafe patch
142910-17 SunOS 5.10_x86: kernel patch
144489-02 SunOS 5.10_x86: kernel patch
142912-01 (as a dependency requirement for one of the others.)
I had installed the patches in run level 1 , then switched to run level S to allow the patch install to finish.
Now, when I restart the zfs volume on the san is marked as off line. the /var/adm/messages shows the following
Nov 7 00:26:30 hostnameiscsi: [ID 114404 kern.notice] NOTICE: iscsi discovery failure - SendTargets (ip.ad.dr.ess)
I can mount the SAN ZFS pool with
#zpool clear ZFSPOOL1
#zfs mount -a
For iscsi device discovery, I am using send targets (not static or iSNS.) I am not using CHAP authentication.
It seems to be me this may merely be a timing in services and not fundamentally an iscsi issue. Can I tell the OS to wait for a minute after starting iscsi service before continuing with zfs mount and autofs shares? Can I tell the OS to delay mounting non OS zfs pools?
Thanks

Here is what I tried. Installed Batchmod and Xupport on each of internal system disk, backup internal system disk and external system disk. Batchmod could not find the folders automount or Network.
Booting from external disk, I made hidden files visible using Xupport, then deleted automount > Servers, automount > Static on internal disk and backup disk. The folder Network had no files or folder named "Server". Booting from internal disk, the desktop tried to mount server volumes. Examining the internal disk automount folder showed aliases for "Servers" and "static". Get Info said they pointed to originals "Servers" and "static" in folder /automount but these items do not appear in the Finder.
Sometimes icons, not aliases, for "Network", "Servers", and "static" appear on all three desktops on login. Trying to eject these icons by dragging to Trash or highlighting and clicking File > Eject has no effect. Examining Users > Username > Desktop does not show these items. Sometimes ".DS_Store" appears on desktop and in folder Users > Username > Desktop.
Next I deleted user accounts so that all system disks are single user. Booted up on External disk and deleted automount > Servers, automount > Static on internal disk and internal backup disk or their aliases, whichever appeared in Finder. Booting up on internal disk results in... desktop trying to mount server volumes.
Will try an archive and install on internal disk.

Mount NTFS Partition

Hej!
How can I mount a NTFS partition under Solaris 10?
thx

NTFS = New Tecnology File System is completly different from the FAT32.
FAT and FAT32 is from the old DOS Systems. DOS was removed as a OS on Windows NT. Support for DOS remains in NT as a NTVDM. NT Virtual Dos Machine that runs as a Subprocess on top of the NT. kernel.
There exists a driver for the NTFS somwhere on internet, I tried it a copule of years ago on a Solaris8. The driver was then a readonly driver. I have lost the driver now, but info about it should be possible to find on internet with google or similar.
This applys to localy mounting a NTFS.
When mounting over the network, its different. The filesystem on the network does not use FAT or NTFS.
Insted it uses NETBios (MSB). Samba has a client for this, if I remember correct.
But it would be better install a NFS Server software on the Windows OS.

Backup Controller cannot mount XSAN Volume

Hi Guys,
I've really have a big problem regarding the XSAN that I've just setup: There are 3 Xserves connected to the SAN - one for the main controller, one for backup and another one for fileserver. After a fresh install of the Leopard Server 10.5.6 on all servers and fresh install of Xsan 2.0 updated to 2.1.1, I tried creating an SAN from the main controller, I added first the main and backup controllers, authenticated them properly and was successful adding them to the SAN. After this, I created the volume and it mounted properly on the main controller. What I don't understand is that whenever I try to mount the volume to the backup controller, it is saying unable to mount and even I tried forcing it to mount in terminal using the command xsanctl mount VOLNAME, its giving me an error saying
"unable to mount volume, Cannot mount XSAN volume error code: 5"
What is that error message? When I tried typing cvadmin to the main controller, it only gave me this message:
Main Controller:
File System Services (* indicates service is in control of FS)
1>*XSAN[0] located on 10.0.0.101:49930 (pid 317)
Select FSM "XSAN"
When I type the same cvadmin to the backup controller, it gave me this message:
Backup Controller:
File System Service (* indicates service is in control of FS)
1> XSAN[1] located on 10.0.0.102:50384 (pid 331)
No FSSs are active
Select FSM "none"
What is happening? both servers are having a DNS name. Before I created the SAN, from the authenticate window, the server name is just the IP address of the Ethernet 0 (first ethernet port). Now whenever I fire up Xsan Admin, both controllers are now offline and if you authenticate them, the server name info suddenly changed from IP address to a DNS Name (e.g. from 194.170.34.12, changed to hct-mdc.ad.hct.ac.ae) which even if I type my admin username and password cannot authenticate saying "server not found in network"
I really don't know now what to do and they need to fix the issue asap.
I would really appreciate your help guys!
Thanks.
jantoniophi

Hi,
I am accessing this WS via ARD, so public LAN is definitely there. I have not connected the "Xsan" network (but it should be no problems communicating the Xsan traffic over this single LAN connection).
With the firewall, the situation is more strange. When I try to open the Firewall settings on Sharing, there is a dialog "Other firewall software is running on this computer." I googled this and it seems that this was a common problem on 10.3. They suggest to delete com.apple.sharing.firewall.plist file but it is not there on 10.4.
"sudo ipfw list" shows this:
00001 allow udp from any 626 to any dst-port 626
65535 allow ip from any to any
Any ideas on how to make Firewall behave as expected? I will try to reinstall if I don't receive a reply.
Thanks.

Unable to read NTFS volume on OS 10.4.7

Hi All,
I have an Maxtor drive formated as a NTFS volume, which works well with my PC. It is my understanding that in OS 10.4 (or 3) I should be able to mount this drive as a read-only drive on my Mac. When I connect the drive to the Mac it says that the drive is un-moutable and asks me either to format, ignore or eject. Can anyone help?
THanks

Run WhatSize and see what it shows. People have found what should have been 4k in /Volumes only the drive didn't mount, and now there is 60GB under the Volumes directory.
Look in /private/var for tmp also.
Any P2P BitTorrent or something running and putting software or video in hidden directories?
I run fsck regularly, or boot from another drive and repair the drive. Only time I repair permissions is before or after installs, or if the "Ignore Ownership" was turned back on (which should be off).
25GB is close to 10% free space, which according to MicroMat, is about when hfs+ can run into too many file fragments for the directory to handle, and you end up with a lot or corrupt directory and files aren't available.
If you have Applejack, delete the cache files, but at least run fsck, and do some deep cleaning for now, backup with CCC, do an erase, zero the drive, and restore. But make sure you have a backup soon.
Besides WhatSize there is also Path Finder 4 and OmniDiskSweeper than can help identify where disk space is being used.

[SOLVED] Truecrypt mounts vfat volume as read only

Hey there...
After the recent upgrade to linux 3.0.6-2 truecrypt mounts VFAT volumes as read-only. The file that I usually mount is in a USB which is formated as NTFS (I can copy and delete files from the USB). I think is a problem with the vfat filesystem but I'm not sure.
Any help?
Best
Last edited by mmf1902 (2011-10-11 03:17:31)

I apologize because of this post... The problem was in the file (something was wrong with the container)... so the solution was to do a new volume and copy all the files to the new file.
Best,

Mounting XRAID onto a solaris server

Hi
I need to migrate data from a hitatchi RAID currently managed by a solaris server to an XRAID that will be managed by an Xserve. If they are on the same network can I just mount the XRAID temporarily on the solaris server using mount -F nfs Xservername:/newdirectory /mnt and then just use the cp command to transfer the data or is that just not sensible.
Regards
Mac OS X (10.4)

There's no problem exporting an Xserve RAID volume as NFS and then mounting it on the Solaris box.
You need to set up the sharepoint using Workgroup Manager on the Xserve RAID, but then you should be good to go. Of course, NFS security is... no security... so be careful with the default export rules.
Also, depending on how large the volume is, Solaris may have problems seeing exports that are larger than 1 or 2 TB. What version of Solaris is it?

Mount NTFS volumes in Solaris 10 update 8

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for