MOVED: Folders Created As 'Read Only' By Default

This topic has been moved to Off-Topic Technical.
Folders Created As 'Read Only' By Default

This topic has been moved to Off-Topic Technical.
Folders Created As 'Read Only' By Default

Similar Messages

  • How to create a read only access for database

    I am developer but willing to lear some of the dba tasks. I would like to know the steps that i need to take to creat a read only access database that is going to be used for the report development.
    I really appreciate if you tell me all the steps I need to create that. I have a full right to do this in the develpment database. thanks

    thank you for your reply but it does not tell me how i can set up a read only access acccount for the user. Do i need to create a role and assign the role to the users?

  • Error ora-12028 while creating a read-only snapshot

    Hi !
    I'm in trouble creating a read-only snapshot of a simple table.
    The Master table belongs to an ORACLE 7.3.4 database instance, while the snapshot site belongs to an ORACLE 8.1 database. The read-only snapshot should have a refresh type FAST, but while I'm running the CREATE SNAPSHOT statement in the snapshot site I receive the following message:
    "ORA-12028 snapshot type is not supported by master site string
    Cause: Pre-Oracle master sites are not able to support primary key or
    subquery snapshots that are able to perform a fast refresh.
    Action: Create a ROWID snapshot or use a master table from an Oracle8 site. "
    This message doesn't help me enough. Is there anyone who can give me an advice ?
    Thanks you all.
    Laura

    Well laura earlier version doesn't support snap shot based on primary key
    u should disable primary key constraint from master site
    and create snap shot on the basis of row id.
    for further detail mail me at [email protected]

  • Can an unique index be created on read only cache group

    Hi
    Can an unique index be created on read only cache group
    Regards
    Siva Kumar

    No, I do not think so. Creating a unique index could cause autorefresh operations to fail if the data being refreshed contains duplicate values that would not be allowed by the index. You can create regular indexes on a table in a readonly cache group.
    Chris

  • Steps to create a read only schema

    Plataform 11.5.10.2
    Hi Guys,
    Can someone provide me with the steps to create a read only schema in Apps please.
    Thanks in advance

    Check the following thread:
    READ-ONLY APPS Schema in EBS
    READ-ONLY APPS Schema in EBS.

  • Creating a read-only user account

    I am trying to create a read-only user account. Reason being,
    when our users may be able to use MS Access to pull information
    and modify changes (if possible). I was told there is a way to
    do this. Help?

    I'm connecting using ODBC with a user account that I created.
    This dummy account will be available to approx 15 users so they
    can generate reports using Crystal. But, if there is someone
    that wants to generate queries using MS Access, they can still
    modify the data. So, how do I create only select statements to
    disallow users from using MS Access to link to the oracle
    database and change data?

  • Newly created folders give "staff" read-only permission

    When I create a new folder in my home directory it has the following permissions:
    Me: Read & Write
    staff: Read only
    everyone: No Access
    Other (non-admin) accounts seem to belong to staff and thus have read access to any non-standard folders in my main (admin) home directory.
    1) How can I change the staff permissions on these folders (Finder gives me an error)? Is this only possible using sudo chmod?
    2) How can I change the default permissions to stop giving default access to all users through the staff group?
    Thx,
    Chris

    Other (non-admin) accounts seem to belong to staff and thus have read access
    to any non-standard folders in my main (admin) home directory.
    The easiest solution is just not to keep confidential folders that you create yourself at the top level of Home. You could instead create a single enclosing folder to hold that all that extra material, call it, say, "My Other Stuff", and put it in your Documents folder where it would be protected from all other users. You could then create descriptive subfolders within in it, which would also be protected.
    If you still instead want to alter the permissions of folders that you create yourself and you don't want to use Terminal, take a look at [BatChmod|http://www.macchampion.com/arbysoft/BatchMod/Welcome.html].

  • Files and folders moved to NAS become read only.

    I just got an Iomega NAS. When I move files and folders to it from my Macbook, they become read only when they get there. Files from my girlfriend's PC stay read/write when they are moved to the NAS.
    I first noticed this with iTunes. I changed the location of my iTunes folder to be on the NAS and I let iTunes copy the music itself. Now, I can add music by new artists, but if I try to add an artist that I already have a folder for, it won't let me because the folder is read only. Also, I can't change any of the info for any files in iTunes.
    I'm not sure if this has anything to do with it, but it looks like all of the files and folders on my Mac are set up so that only I can see them. When I click "get info" on any file on the computer, it shows:
    me : read/write
    staff: read only
    everyone: read only

    When I open a finder window, I see two icons for the NAS in the "shared" section. The first one is:
    hmnhd-ti2mkg
    When I click "get info" it shows "Kind: PC Server" and there is no mention of permissions in the "get info" box.
    The second one is:
    hmnhd-TI2MKG.local
    When I click "get info" it shows "Kind: Server" and there is no mention of permissions in the "get info" box.
    Clicking on either one of these icons lets me browse through the exact same shares and folders. There is no difference between going in to one or the other. They both have the same permissions on all folders, as well.
    "Jacob's iTunes Music" is a share on the NAS. All of my read only files (that I want to change to read/write) are already in this share.
    Clicking "get info" on any of the shares shows them as "Kind: Sharepoint" with no mention of permissions.
    I think I'm going to try to have iTunes copy all the files to my computer, change the permissions, then have it copy them back to the NAS. Is there a way to change permissions of folders, subfolders, and files without having to click "get info" on each and every one?

  • Folders on NAS read-only. Can't change

    I have a buffalo linkstation pro duo NAS. It is formatted in XFS.
    It seems that randomly some folders have been changed to read-only, when they were previously read-write. I have one folder that is stuck in a read-only state. The folder contains some files from my XP machine. I wrote these files from the mac to the nas.
    I am trying to delete the folder and cannot. I shutdown the mac, and accessed the NAS though my Windows laptop, and it wont let me take ownership. Any ideas on how to fix?

    I had the same issue and figured out a solution.
    1. Create a folder in your user profile on the mac to mount a network share to. (Example: /chris/mount)
    2. Mount the network share to that folder you just created using this command in Terminal: mount -t smbfs//guest@<BUFFALONAS>/<SHAREDFOLDER> mount (replace <BUFFALONAS> with the IP address or hostname of your buffalo and replace <SHAREDFOLDER> with the smb share on the buffalo)
    3. In Terminal, change into the now locally mounted network share. (Example: cd /chris/mount)
    4. Run the following command in Terminal: chmod -R 777 ./
    **Note: You will get an access denied error on any file that was created by a PC but all the files with "broken" permissions created by a Mac will be fixed.**
    Hope this helps someone out there. I searched for a solution for months before figuring this out.

  • How to create mandatory (read-only) profile for Terminal Services user (HP Thin Client) on Server2003... aaarrgghhh!

    I've been tearing my hair out for a couple of days now...
    I'm trying to create a mandatory profile for users logging in from hp thin clients on a 2003 server at a school.
    I've set up a prototype user, then copied the proto user's NTUSER.DAT to NTUSER.MAN and renamed
    NTUSER.DAT to NTUSER.DAT_unused.
    At that point, logging in as the prototype user looks ok.  It was my understanding that renaming NTUSER.DAT to NTUSER.MAN would make it a mandatory profile, and the user (in this case the proto user) would be unable to change it.  However, in this
    case the user can still modify the desktop and those modifications are preserved across logins.  The NTUSER.MAN file is being updated, judging by the timestamp changes.
    What am I missing?  
    I've tried putting the NTUSER.MAN in the user's dir on the server
     (C:\Documents and Settings\ProtoUser),
    in the DefaultUser, and in AllUsers.
    Right now I'm getting a default, unmodifiable profile which I have no idea where it comes from.
    In case it matters, the original user and directory tree from which the NTUSER.MAN I'm trying to use has been deleted, but I wouldn't think that should matter.
    For example, I have the option to not show the security tab set in the group policy, but it is showing up.
    The Start menu is showing as the classic start menu, and I had it set for the "new" (2 column) one.
    I've got hide network places on the desktop set, but it's showing up.
    Is there a way to tell where a profile is coming from?
    I'm pretty confused at this point; any clarifications / tips would be much appreciated.
    Related questions:
      If both an NTUSER.DAT and an NTUSER.MAN exist, which is used?
      If no profile is found for a user in the normal place, what happens?

    Hi,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
    A mandatory user profile is a special type of pre-configured roaming user profile that administrators can use to specify settings for users. With mandatory user profiles, a user can modify his or her desktop, but the changes are not saved when the user
    logs off. The next time the user logs on, the mandatory user profile created by the administrator is downloaded. There are two types of mandatory profiles: normal mandatory profiles and super-mandatory profiles.
    User profiles become mandatory profiles when the administrator renames the NTuser.dat file (the registry hive) on the server to NTuser.man. The .man extension causes the user profile to be a read-only profile.
    User profiles become super-mandatory when the folder name of the profile path ends in .man; for example, \\server\share\mandatoryprofile.man\.
    More information:
    Mandatory User Profiles
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb776895(v=vs.85).aspx
    Using User Profiles in Windows Server 2003
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc776120(v=ws.10).aspx
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki

  • Trying to create a read-only user

    Our HR dept would like to have READ only access to a few tables and have asked that I create a user to allow them to pull stuff into MS Access.  Since SAPR3 owns all the tables I thought I just had to, after I created the user, as SAPR3 grant select to those few tables.  Didn't work. What did I miss?
    SQL> connect system/*******
    Connected.
    SQL> CREATE USER "HRRPT"
      2    IDENTIFIED BY "*******"
      3    PROFILE "DEFAULT"
      4    TEMPORARY TABLESPACE "PSAPTEMP"
      5    DEFAULT TABLESPACE "PSAPUSER1D";
    User created.
    SQL> grant create session to hrrpt;
    Grant succeeded.
    SQL> connect sapr3/*******
    Connected.
    SQL> grant select on pevsh to hrrpt;
    Grant succeeded.
    SQL> connect hrrpt/*******
    Connected.
    SQL> desc pevsh;
    ERROR:
    ORA-04043: object pevsh does not exist
    SQL> desc 'sapr3'.'pevsh';
    SP2-0565: Illegal identifier
    What am I missing?
    Thanks!

    It works here as follows:
    > connect system/*****
    Connected.
    SQL> CREATE USER hr
      2  IDENTIFIED BY hr
      3  PROFILE "DEFAULT"
      4  TEMPORARY TABLESPACE "PSAPTEMP"
      5  DEFAULT TABLESPACE "PSAPBEN620";
    User created.
    SQL> grant create session to hr;
    Grant succeeded.
    SQL> connect sapr3/******
    Connected.
    SQL> GRANT SELECT
      2      ON  "SAPR3"."T000" TO "HR";
    Grant succeeded.
    SQL> connect hr/hr
    Connected.
    SQL> select count (*) from "SAPR3"."T000";
      COUNT(*)
            24
    SQL> desc "SAPR3"."T000";
    Name                                      Null?    Type
    MANDT                                     NOT NULL VARCHAR2(9)
    MTEXT                                     NOT NULL VARCHAR2(75)
    ORT01                                     NOT NULL VARCHAR2(75)
    MWAER                                     NOT NULL VARCHAR2(15)
    ADRNR                                     NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
    CCCATEGORY                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3)
    CCCORACTIV                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3)
    CCNOCLIIND                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3)
    CCCOPYLOCK                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3)
    CCNOCASCAD                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3)
    CCSOFTLOCK                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3)
    CCORIGCONT                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3)
    CCIMAILDIS                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3)
    CCTEMPLOCK                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(3)
    CHANGEUSER                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(36)
    CHANGEDATE                                NOT NULL VARCHAR2(24)
    LOGSYS                                    NOT NULL VARCHAR2(30)
    You need to grant explicitly including schema name.
    Markus

  • Want to create a Read Only user for a given app owner user

    Hi Folks,
    We have an application owner schema, lets call it OWNER, which has different objects living under it.
    Now, for certain reasons, the app group wants a read only user which should be able to view objects living only in OWNER. It would only be able to read things, and have no create or alter types of priv to be able to change anything.
    The first idea was to create a new user (e.g. RO) and give this explicit grants (select only) for all objects in OWNER. Though this works, is a maintenance havoc, since everytime there is a new object in OWNER, you have to remember to give explicit grants to all RO (or RW ) kind of users.
    What i am looking forward to is, some sort of privilege or role concept that apply on the user level, and not on object level. something that allows me to say, all objects of this schema (e.g. OWNER) are visible to user RO. Other restrictions on RO would control read or write behaviour.
    Does this thing exist ? please point me to the documentation/example..
    regards
    raghav..

    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER myTest.trg_mytest
    AFTER DDL
    ON myTest.SCHEMA
    DECLARE
         lv_obj_type VARCHAR2(20) := TRIM(UPPER(ora_dict_obj_type));
         lv_evt_type VARCHAR(20)      := TRIM(UPPER(ora_sysevent));
         lv_obj_name     VARCHAR2(30) := trim(UPPER(ora_dict_obj_name));
         lv_role_name     VARCHAR2(30) := 'myTest_RO';
         lv_stmt          VARCHAR2(4000) := NULL;
         ln_job_nr     NUMBER;
    BEGIN
         IF lv_evt_type != 'GRANT' --lv_obj_type <> 'OBJECT PRIVILEGE' --
         THEN
              DBMS_JOB.SUBMIT(ln_job_nr,'begin execute immediate ''grant ' || ' select on ' ||
                                       lv_obj_name || ' to ' || lv_role_name || '''; END;');
         END IF;
       INSERT INTO TB_EVT_LOG(d_date, description)
       VALUES(SYSDATE,  lv_obj_name || '~~~~ created ' || lv_obj_type || '~~~~' || lv_evt_type );
       EXCEPTION
         WHEN OTHERS THEN
           RAISE;
    END trg_mytest;
    /This works. But, my problem is that it is not able to filter out the Grant statement itself, Its logging an entry for the grant (as a ddl operation as well).
    what am I doing wrong here ?
    regards
    raghav..

  • SQL Server 2012 - Wat Is The Best Solution For Creating a Read Only Replicated/AlwaysOn Database

    Hi there I was wondering if someone may have a best recommendation for the following requirement I have with regards setting up a third database server for reporting?
    Current Setup
    SQL Server 2012 Enterprise setup at two sites (Site A & Site B).
    Configured to use AlwaysOn Availability groups for HA and DR.
    Installed on Windows 2012 Servers.
    This is all working and failover works fine and no issues. So…
    Requirement
    A third server needs to be added for the purpose of reporting, to be located on another site (Site C) possibly in another domain. This server needs to have a replicated read only copy of the live database from site A or Site B, whichever is in use. The Site
    C reporting database should be as up-to-date to the Site A or Site B database as possible – preferably within a few seconds anyway….
    Solution - What I believe are available to me
    I believe I can use AlwaysOn and create a ReadOnly replica for the Site C. If so do I assume Site C needs to have the Enterprise version of SQL server i.e. to match Site A & Site B?
    Using log shipping which if I am correct means the Site C does not need to be an Enterprise version.
    Any help on the best solution for this would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks, Steve

    for always on - all nodes should be part of one windows cluster..if there site C is on different domain - I do not think it works.
    Logshipping works --as long as the sql on site C is is same or higher version(sql 2012 or above).  you can only do read only.
    IMHo, if you can make site C in the same domain then, Always is better solution else log shipping
    also, if your database has enterprise level features such as - partitonin, data compression -- you cannot restore the database on lower editions- so you need to have enterprise edition.
    Hope it Helps!!

  • MS Windows "Custom Folders" appears as Read Only in Mac

    Hi,
    I'm new to Mac, and started copying my old PC data to an external drive, so I could access it in my MacBook, before reformating my PC.
    I copied a lot of folders (around 100 Gb) and noted that some folders are "read only" in that external drive. I remembered my unix time checking for chmod/chwon attributes, but I didn't see anything different from read/write folders. I could note just one thing. This "read only folders" are folder that, in my PC, had "Custom Icons", or "Custom images" attached to it.
    I tried a lot of chmod/chwon combinations, but Terminal always said I have no right (or something like that, I don't remember now), so I gave up and copied from "Shared Folders", FTP or "one by one", and now it appears to be Ok.
    Does anyone already saw this issue? If yes, is there a way to "force" that folder to be read/write? I tried using Finder to Find folder/files that were readonly (so I could identify each one), but I din't find the option. Anyone knows how?
    Thanks in advance.
    Alessandro Fragnani

    alefragnani wrote:
    Hi,
    The external drive is already formated in FAT32. Only my old PC is formated with NTFS, and the problem itself is while accessing theses files/folder in the external drive, not the PC (I'm not accessing the PC directly).
    FAT32 file system can't handle unix permissions and any file on such a drive will be listed as having full read+write access for everyone. However, if a file is read only in windows, it will be locked in OS X and there is absolutely no way to unlock it from OS X side short of reformatting the drive. You need to log into windows and unlock or delte the file from there.

  • Creating a 'read-only' group for Worklist app

    Hi,
    Is there a simply way of creating a group with 'read-only' access to the Worklist ? e.g. through a combination of BPM roles ?
    I want to be able to create a class of user who can view the details of Worklist items but have absolutely no other rights (skip, retry, assign etc).
    Regards
    Bob

    One simple way to achive this task is by using FYI pattern.
    Remove the actions from taskconfigvariablename.xml (for ex accept and reject).
    in case you are already using any pattern in your project, FYI pattern should extend that already created pattern.
    Regards
    Sudhir

Maybe you are looking for