MOVED: Problems with the 975X Platinum V2

This topic has been moved to Intel Core Duo and Core 2 Duo based boards.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=99799.0

I know how you feel I'm one of the ones who said MSI=great quality & great preformance.
I'm not knocking this board as its still new but to release something like this with such a horrible bios is rather unacceptable, I really expected more out of MSI. It's like game developers releasing half finished games and months later patch it to make it whole.
Come on MSI step it up.

Similar Messages

Problem with MSI 975x Platinum based new build

I am having what looks like a familiar issue with setting up a new build PC. Spec is as follows:
MSI 975x Platinum edition MOBO
Intel Core Duo 2 e6600 CPU
Western Digital Raptor 150GB S150 16mb 10000rpm SATA drive
Corsair Memory TWIN2X2048-6400 2x1GB 240-Pin DIMM XMS2-6400 CL5
SONY DVD-RW
The problem comes when trying to install Windows XP on the single SATA drive (I don't want a RAID array - mainly as I only have 1 hard drive!).
I press F6 as instructed to install the SATA drive - I have created a disk with the necessary driver files from the MSI website.
Based on other posts I have seen I have put all the files except "txtsetup.oem" in another folder on the floppy (either "\win_XP" or "\winXP"). However I still get the same error message:
"file \x32\jraid.sys caused an unexpected error (18) at line 2108 in d:\xpspl\base\boot\setup\oemdisk.c"
I am beginning to think I can't install XP to a SATA drive. Can anyone help with this? Is there an "official" driver floppy disk I can get from MSI in exactly the right format?
Alternatively is it worthwhile buying a small standard IDE drive and installing XP to that to get me going and then install the SATA drive once XP is going? Would it then be possible to shift XP onto the faster SATA drive?
Thanks

if you using 1 sata drive you dont set it up as a raid , in the sata options set it up as ide enhanced also in this mode no need for pressing f6 just make sure that the sata is set to 1st boot hdd , if you using 1 sata and 1 ide hdd and tring to isntall on the sata disconnect the ide hdd because it will mess with your drive letters in windows ... if you goin raid ( achi mode is only for sata 2 drives with NCQ = native command queing and your drives have to support this mode ) then in the sata drives portion set it to raid ( achi if your drives support it ) in the force part set it to force gen 1 ( for sata 1 drives ) force gen 2 ( for sata 2 drives ) then you will need to set up the raid config in the intel raid config ( its the next post screen telling you press CTRL+I ) set it up reboot reneter bios set hdd priority to intel raid 0 then intsall windows but press f6 ... yes i ran it 2 ways single sata drive and now raided 80's in raid 0 ( i dont have NCQ support yet )

One year later, I still have problems with the 975X PUE

A year ago, I bought the 975X PUE board and turned out to be one of the biggest mistakes I've ever made when purchasing something computer-related.
To start with, the board didn't recognize the OCZ memory that I had bought, so I had to change it for some gSkill memory. That, however, involved a trip to Argentina since at the time it was very hard to get DDR2 memory @ 800 Mhz here in Uruguay. I had also complained about how the temperature monitor was unreliable and problems booting the computer.
I still have those problems, but I learned to live with it since no major problems arised. Sure, I'd have to boot three to six times just to get it running, but hey, no big deal.
Later, I decided to go for RAID1 and surprisingly, it worked so I had no new complaints.
However, lately something new has been happening. The computer seems to reboot randomly and without warning. This had happened before when lightning struck nearby (I blamed it on electro magnetic something) but now it happens all the time and I can't find a solution. I leave the computer on during the night and in the mornings, I come to find that it has rebooted when I was sleeping.
Here's what I have:
MSI 975X PUE (7.1083006)
INTEL E6600
GSKILL 4 GB DDR2 800 Mhz RAM
WD 320 GB 7200 RPM
2x WD 500 GB 7200 RPM (RAID1)
NVIDIA 8800 GTS
Windows Vista 32 bit
PSU Biswal 780W 30A +12V
I've looked over the latest firmware thread that used to be a sticky on here and noticed that everything else seems to be beta. MSI never released something better for this board? Here's that thread: https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=99818.0
The only thing that I could think of for these random reboots is that maybe the unreliable temperature sensors fool the computer and make it seem like the CPU is a lot hotter than it actually is. I've fired up Everest and right now, with only Firefox and a couple of IM clients running, CPUs are at 50 and 54 degrees celcius. Taking into account that the case is open and I'm in an air conditioned room set to 24 degrees celcius and that there's a mini Typhoon on top of the E6600 as well as a couple of fans in the case, these CPU temperatures are nearly impossible.
What's going on with this? Can anyone help me out?

Quote from: daiver on 04-January-08, 21:59:50
Ok, lets say my PSU is degraded. That solves my spontaneous rebooting issue. How about everything else?
I still have to boot my PC 3-6 times to get it to start. Temperature monitor still sucks as well.
Is 7.1 the latest official firmware for this high-priced mobo?
Daiver the biswall brand is a very cheap one, I think you should buy a trusted PSU. In Argentina you can find many brands, like Topower and Power Cooler, that are good PSUs and at a fair price.
The latest bios for this mother is 7.7, but some users find it not so good as 7.6. I use 7.6 and works perfect.

MOVED: Problem with K8N Neo4 Platinum and Vista Ultimate

This topic has been moved to Vista problems.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=110040.0

Set the Maxtor hard drive to be a Sata I instead of Sata II hard drive with a jumper. Also make certain that the Sata controllers in Integrated Peripherals-IDE Devices Configuration are enabled.

MOVED: Big problem with the bios

This topic has been moved to BIOS.
Big problem with the bios

You're not alone... https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3391947?tstart=0

Error message in .docx : 'Open XML file cannot be opened because there are problems with the contents. Details Unspecific error Location: 2'

I have put a lot of work into a docx document on my Mac, but now can't open it as it gives the error message: 'the Open XML file cannot be opened because there are problems with the contents. Details, Unspecific
error, Location: 2'
When opening the original file the message said: 'this file contains word 2007 for Windows equations' etc. but I managed to track changes fine, and saved, closed and re-opened it numerous times without problem. Some graphs seemed moved, and various formulas
were illegible, but no other weirdness was observed.
I have microsoft 2008 installed on my Mac OS X version 10.6.8.
I've tried to fix it using various solutions suggested here, but am afraid am too IT illiterate to have had any luck, please help I'm new to all this!
I've uploaded it to https://www.dropbox.com/s/hkw9k6lyihzoxpc/SittwayPauktawSQUEACREPORT_KD%2BCH.docx

Hi,
This issue is related strictly to oMath tags and occurs when a graphical object or text box is anchored to the same paragraph that contains the equation.
Please use the "Fix it" tool in the following KB article to resolve the problem. See:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2528942
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Steve Fan
TechNet Community Support

Problem with the AF of my new 18-135mm EFS IS STM lens

Hello,
The lens came with the EOS Rebel T5i bundle.
The auto focus is working incorrectly, focusing closer than the detected area. This is happening when I use the viewfinder. When a picture is taken using the “direct view” (LCD display) it focus correctly.
I didn’t use the camera a lot since I bought it, now looking the first pictures I see that this problem is happening since I bought it.
I changed the zoom lens with another Canon camera and then my new Rebel T5i works fine and the same problem happens with the other camera, therefore I’m sure that the problem is in the lens and not in the camera body.
The out of focus is more noticeable when I'm taking pictures in 18mm position to an object farther than 2 meters but it is happening in any zoom position. It is clear when I compare the same picture taken with the viewfinder with one taken with the LCD Display.
I updated the body firmware and the problem continues.
Is it possible to update the lens firmaware? I couldn’t find them in the canon webpage.
I will go into an important trip next week, therefore I will not have time to send the camera to repair.
Any idea?
Thanks!

You may want to rent a lens for your trip and get this lens to service.
You'll want to be sure it really is a problem with the lens (it sounds like it is from your description). Test the lens against a "flat" target (such as a wall). You can hang something on the wall with high-contrast (newspaper works great) and put the camera on a tripod. The idea is that (a) the camera is definitely not moving, (b) the focus target is definitely not moving, and (c) the target is flat and there are no distracting objects in the field of view so it's not possible for the focus system to decide to lock focus on anything OTHER than your intended target.
Next... deliberately turn the focus ring to put the camera out of focus (so that the camera HAS to move the focus). This is mildly tricky with an STM lens since there's no mechanical link from the focus ring to the lens -- it's electronic. The lens only accepts focus input when focus is active (e.g. half-press the shutter button, etc. to wake it up.) I run focus all the way in and test several times, then run focus all the way out and test several times (that way it has to move focus in both directions.)
If the lens is consistently focusing closer, then it will need service.
Tim Campbell
5D II, 5D III, 60Da

Problems with the Fios 20/5 connection speed in my area dropping down to less than 3mbs.

I have written out a flyer that I plan to go door to door with. Since I am under contract with Verizon, I am forced to honor my side of the contract. Even if they are allowed to make me pay for a service that I am not completely getting. I am very displeased and as soon as my contract is up, I will change back to My local cable companies all in one that does not require a contract and has no issue such as the one I am having.
Do you have Verizon Fios Internet?
Are you on the 20/5 connection?
If so, you may not be getting the speed you are paying for. I am on a 20/5 connection and when my computer is on for longer than an hour the internet download speed with Verizon Fios starts to slow down until it is below 3mbs. It takes about 24 hours to get down to 3mbs but only about an hour or two to get down to about 6-7mbs when I am paying for 20mbs…
I have 3 computers in my home that have Windows Vista, Windows XP home edition and Windows Media Edition 2005. All of the computers run into this same exact issue, I have tried every setting I could think of with my 24 years of computer technical experience. I finally took one machine with Windows XP and ran a full format on the hard drive and reinstalled a fresh Windows Xp Operating system onto the hard drive so it is a bare bones OS. This way there is no other software on the machine that could possibly be causing the problem and found that when I connected online through Verizon Fios the machine still ran into the same exact issue. This proves to me that the issue is not on any of my machines.
Now all of this time my buddy that lives 1.2 miles away from my house has been having the same issue with three computers at his home also. He has Windows Vista on two machines and Windows XP Pro on one.
When I concluded that it was a Verizon Fios issue, after a few months of trying to get by, researching, diagnosing and losing much information in order to verify it was on Verizon’s side, I contacted technical support at Verizon’s online website. The agent and I went through the regular procedure that anyone would have to go through and I patiently explained what I had done to try to diagnose the issue. The agent came to the conclusion that he could not figure out the problem so he guessed that the Verizon router/modem may be the issue and told me he would send me a new one by mail.
I received the new Verizon router/modem, installed it and had to call to have it activated. Afterward it still had the same exact issue as the prior router/modem. So now we know it’s not my computers, it’s not the router/modem. My Verizon router/modem is connected right at the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), which is the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home, usually just inside or outside your garage wall. Mine is just outside…
From here my buddy, who has been having this problem also the entire time, called the local office of Verizon Fios and an installer was setup to come over to his home and trouble shoot the issue. My buddy called me and told me when the installer was headed to his home and I met him at his home to see what the installer found and in hope that my issue would be fixed at the same time. The installer went through the system at his house and was frustrated about not finding the reason for the issue and ready to leave without fixing anything. I simply asked that he stay long enough to see the issue present itself within an hour-hour and a half.
His laptop itself already showed the speed drop from 20mbs to between 16-17mbs, it was on its way down. He basically told us something that online tech support already stated to me, it is extremely difficult to prove it is on Verizon’s side. In other words it is extremely difficult to prove it, in a way that will convince Verizon to check its own servers, routers and software updates to their own systems. The installer, good guy, couldn’t/wouldn’t stay but we did convince him not to simply drop the issue. He called shop and they sent another installer out to take over the issue.
The new installer, great guy, got up to speed on what was already done at my buddies home. The first installer, checked and replaced the Verizon router/modem, checked the wiring and splitters. Basically went through the entire system up to the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home. He pulled and replaced the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), thinking that perhaps the unit was compromised. While he was doing this job a tech was called and asked to stop by for assistance with the issue. The tech checked the computers inside and tried to do some settings that the main office informed him to try. I explained to the tech that the same issue was happening at my house, that I went through every setting I could think of and find online to help alleviate the issue. After some shop talk about what I had tried, including the full format and reinstall of the operating system on one of my machines, he just as I came to the conclusion that it couldn’t be with the computers and since everything that had to do with the Verizon Fios system from the street to the end-user computer had been checked, verified and/or replaced, the issue had to be coming from Verizon’s main office.
The installer had already checked the main at the road that has the 3x2 green service cover on it by the side walk. Everything was in good working order. The tech called the main office to see if my buddy and I were on the same hub, basically a big splitter that continues the service from the main office to the homes, we were not. So that was ruled out…
My understanding of the system ends there. The only other components I know of are the Main branch’s routers, servers and software.
Verizon had a new connection speed added to their system, 25/15 about the same time our issue began. So I am guessing that when they updated the system to include this new connection speed they corrupted the software for the 20/5 connection.
We have been waiting to hear from the tech that was at my buddy’s house, to see if the issue will be dealt with. My buddy has called him a couple of times and he has mentioned that he is trying to get it addressed and to call back if we hadn’t heard from him. He remembered who he and I were and what the issue was, so I believe he is taking it seriously. How far he can move the issue is beyond me…
I want to add that my buddy and I have been customers with the all in one package from Verizon Fios since their services have moved into our area, about a year and a half… It has only been since about June that this issue has presented itself, before then we were on 7th heaven with the speeds. We couldn’t have been more than happy with the services.
This issue has caused that to all go afoul, not only do the speeds get down to less than 3mbs but the speed is not smooth at all. Rather the 3mbs speed is stop and go, freezing in between at times, very choppy. Barely usable at times, unless you restart the computers and start over.
We are hoping that anyone with Verizon Fios Internet Services will keep an eye on their speeds by going to http://speedtest.net and doing tests to verify they are getting the speeds they are paying Verizon for.
This is what it will take for Verizon to take this issue seriously is to gather everyone on the system that may be having the same issue. I believe it is everyone that is within the 1.2 miles from my house to my buddy’s and will distribute flyers to each and every house in between.
If you find that your speed is not as fast as it should be please contact me and I will add you to the list, this way we can see exactly how far this problem covers and perhaps it will also help to show a pattern and understanding as to why the issue is present in the first place.
My contact information,
I have left this out here, you can contact me on these forums...

Actually what this came down to was an issue between Windows Vista and an Ethernet Card on one of the machines in each of our local networks.
Even though our two machines are 6 years apart, we both have the same ethernet adapter on our main desktops. A RealTek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet Nic. It seems that the adapter does not work at the 20mbs download speeds with Vista. For some reason the adapter does not shut down when the computer does? I don't understand why but it doesn't, it keeps the connection alive. I removed the ethernet cable and pulled the power cable and had my two other computers still connected to the network and found that the issue was resolved. The way I found out was that I used the connections on my main computer to hook up one I had laying around and through further testing found the problem no longer existed...
Then I realized that my buddy and I installed Windows Vista at about the same time, a couple of months ago. Funny how you can forget an important detail like that. Then I remembered that he had the same identical ethernet adapter as I did, I had noticed that while trouble shooting his computer at his home but didn't think it was important at the time. Until the issue was narrowed down to the adapter, then it all seemed to all fall into line.
Quite humbling... In the end, anyone who has Windows Vista and this NIC probably will have problems with the 20mbs download speed of the computers on their own networks. I tried the latest Vista driver from RealTek and also tried to roll back the driver, with no success....
Back at the beginning when we first had fios installed in our homes there wasn't an issue when we had the 10/2 speeds and had Vista. Then we decided to change from Vista to XP because we both were having issues as to what programs you could use and which you could not, shortly after having fios installed. Then when verizon upgraded us to 20/5 we were amazed at the speed and still had no issue because we had XP on our main computers with the RealTek adapters...
We reinstalled Vista because it seemed like we were having more issues with XP by getting hit with Antivirus2008 and its variants and thought it time for a change back...
It didn't really hit us that Vista could be the culprit because we both have a laptop in our networks that have had Vista on them from the get go when there were no issues... We also didn't notice just how bad it was right away and over time kind of left the Vista install out of the equation.
Just strange that one computer can effect all the other computers on the network, even when it is shut down...
I allowed the other two computers to run 24hours and the issue did not present itself, when I added the main computer with the RealTek adapter back to the mix it reappeared. The Realtek adapter is the only real common denominator between his machine and mine.
So now we have three choices,
We can go back to Windows XP.
We can buy a new NIC or a wireless card to replace the RealTek...
Hopefully this post will help anyone else who runs into this problem, it has been very frustrating to say the least...
Thanks to everyone for their help and I apologize for complaining about verizon when it was not a verizon issue. I came to the conclusion that the only part verizon really played was upgrading us to a 20/5 tier which I am thankful for...
Would be nice if this card was on a list that Verizon support could use to troubleshoot , diagnose or eliminate for future support issues.
Message Edited by keiser0619 on 08-06-2009 03:58 PM

HT3310 i have a problem with the headset of my ipod nano 4th gen. the right side don't have a sound. It comes in and out. what do I need to do?.. I am using the original headset eversince. I took it to an Apple Mac Center I was told they can't do anythin

I have a problem with the headset of my ipod nano 4th gen. the right side don't have a sound. It comes in and out. what do I need to do.. I am using the original headset eversince. I tool it to a Apple Mac Cennter and Taked with a Service Center Rep. And he told me that they can't do anything because they don't repair the ipod they didn;t even look at it. I was told instead to buy a new one. I was very disappointed.. This is already my 5th ipod though i am planning to buy a new one.. I still want it fixed so I can give it to my little sister

From the OP: "My old computer got a virus and when that happened all my music was lost. "
They don't have the music on their computer so they cannot transfer the iTunes folder, from the computer to their iPod and then to the new computer. And if they try to enable disk use on the iPod it will erase all the music that is on it. The method you cited is moving the files in a data format using the iPod as a flash drive. It doesn't work if they are in music format. That is why I suggested Yamipod.

There's a problem with the recipient's mailbox. Please try resending this message.

I have a user who cannot receive a message from a particular external sender. That senders assistant (same domain and server as the external sender with the issue) is able to forward the exact same message to my user and it arrives as it should. In
message tracking, I can see the message came in through my smart host, through my front end and to the users mailbox server, where an NDR was generated. We had the assistant forward us the NDR and it says:
There's a problem with the recipient's mailbox. Please try resending this message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
From my 3rd party smart host/spam filter, I have a copy of the message in audit and when I forward it to myself, the same thing happens - it generates an NDR when it arrives at my Exchange mailbox server. This makes me conclude that my end users mailbox
isn't corrupt, rather it's something in the message header that our server doesn't like (I've seen this happen with other senders as well, but it is extremely rare and random).
Details/facts of my environment:
-Current production messaging system is Exchange 2003.
-Working on Exchange 2010 co-existence.
-This problem between this sender and us has been an issue before the introduction of Exchange 2010.
-I'm hoping to begin end user mailbox migrations to 2010 and will have the sender try again at that time, but I still have testing to do with our voice messaging system before I can begin moving end user mailboxes.
....Begin redacted NDR detail....
Remote Server returned '< #5.2.1>'
Original message headers:
Received: from fe.mydomain.com ([192.168.1.10]) by
mailboxsrv.mydomain.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);      Thu, 4 Sep
2014 12:49:48 -0700
Received: from exc2010.mydomain.com ([192.168.1.50]) by
fe.mydomain.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);        Thu, 4 Sep
2014 12:49:47 -0700
Received: from smtp.mydomain.com (192.168.1.49) by exch2010.mydomain.com
(192.168.1.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.210.2; Thu, 4 Sep 2014
12:49:47 -0700
Received: from pps.filterd (PPMail.mydomain.com [127.0.0.1])   by
PPMail.gsblaw.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s84Jkb0n023682       for
<[email protected]>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:49:47 -0700
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
(mail-by2on0098.outbound.protection.outlook.com [TheirIP])    by
PPMail.gsblaw.com with ESMTP id 1p6da7h0jw-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3
cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)       for <[email protected]>; Thu, 04 Sep
2014 12:49:42 -0700
Received: from Theirexchange.theirdomain.com (TheirinternalIP) by
Theirexchange.theirdomain.com (TheirinternalIP) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.0.1019.16; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:49:38 +0000
Received: from Theirexchange.theirdomain.com ([10.141.86.14]) by
Theirexchange.theirdomain.com ([TheirinternalIP]) with mapi id
15.00.1019.015; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:49:38 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
        boundary="_000_9a166afd24964edda2d5439ba3dbe712DM2PR08MB445namprd08pro_"
From: Mr Sender <[email protected]>
To: My User <[email protected]>, "Another external recipient ([email protected])"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: A Subject
Thread-Topic: A Subject
Thread-Index: Ac/C2zn97ruwXQpoQtGNrjKOr1NckgFmNoeAAAEpQ2A=
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:49:37 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]domain.com>
References: <[email protected]domain.com>
<[email protected]ET>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: <[email protected]domain.com>
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [internetIP]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 0324C2C0E2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009015)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(377454003)(164054003)(64706001)(66066001)(19609705001)(15202345003)(50986999)(19300405004)(19625215002)(90102001)(80022001)(20776003)(83322001)(101416001)(99936001)(76176999)(54356999)(81542001)(21056001)(19580395003)(86362001)(4396001)(92566001)(16236675004)(85852003)(551944002)(74502001)(83072002)(87936001)(74662001)(31966008)(107886001)(81342001)(76482001)(46102001)(85306004)(105586002)(33646002)(15975445006)(99396002)(76576001)(74316001)(77982001)(79102001)(95666004)(108616004)(2656002)(106356001)(99286002)(24736002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:DM2PR08MB446;H:DM2PR08MB445.namprd08.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en;
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.12.52,1.0.27,0.0.0000
definitions=2014-09-04_03:2014-09-04,2014-09-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe
Return-Path: [email protected]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Sep 2014 19:49:47.0046 (UTC) FILETIME=[61900460:01CFC879]

A little more discovery...
From my smart host/SPAM filter audit folder, I could see the message was received with a 2 meg "winmail.dat" file. Yesterday, I had attempted redirecting the message to my own mailbox, and it bounced. I decided to try redirecting the message
to a 2010 mailbox, and the message arrived. It had 3 attachments, 1 Word doc, and 2 PDF files. So, this appears to be an encoding issue with the winmail.dat file. Any work arounds/reasons for winmail.dat from being rejected at the mailbox
server? Once it made it to a 2010 mailbox/client, I was able to forward to a 2003 mailbox no problem.

Problems with the vba command sendkeys in Access 2013.

Hi, I have problems with the vba command sendkeys in Access 2013.
I use a text field (no control) in a form. By means of the VBA command SendKeys "+ {DELETE}", 1 I get the text in memory from the text field, then place (paste) the text in a Word document. The command line sendkeys
is followed by moving the focus to a particular control. In Access 2003, which went smoothly. Now the sendkeys command is executed only in Access 2013 in the control that then receives focus. If the procedure ends with the sendkeys command then it works well.
The procedure with the sendkeys command is activated by a button on a form.
Who can help me?
private user

Hi H.Plmp,
Based on the description, you want to call the sendkeys from a button.
>> use a text field (no control) in a form. By means of the VBA command SendKeys "+ {DELETE}", 1 I get the text in memory from the text field<<
What did you mean that you no control? And how did you get the text in memory from the text field? Also I am not able to understand the exact reason that the command doesn't works in Access 2013.
And based on the test, sendkeys "+ {Delete}" works well for me when I set a focus for the textbox control. Here is th test code:
Me.Controls("txtField1").SetFocus
SendKeys "+ {DELETE}", 1
If I misunderstood, please feel free to let me know.
Regards & Fei
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Problem with the Value property node (MacOS)

As far as I have tested it, Value Property nodes (and Value (signaling)) don't work in MacOS : The value property appears as a boolean, the value(signaling) as a cluster (width, height).
Even with boolean controls, the node is not working.
No such problem in LV 8.6.
Am-I missing something ? Is that some "intended use" ? Or simply a bug ?
Chilly Charly (aka CC)
E-List Master - Kudos glutton - Press the yellow button on the left...
Solved!
Go to Solution.

That sounds like some sort of indexing problem with the property nodes like somesort of corrupted installation. What if you just delete the property node and recreate it?
I dropped a numeric control and looked at the shortcut menu for the list of property nodes. Right below Value and Value (signalling) are Visible (which would be a boolean) and Xcontrol, which when you step down through the submenus, the first choice is Container bounds, a cluster of Width and Height. So these 2 datatypes that are 2 lower on the list match the ones you are getting.
What happens if you pick another property node a few elements up or down on the shortcut menu? Does is happen for some other properties, and if so, are thereany properties that are okay?
Here is what my property nodes look like for a numeric and I draggged the box up and down to show the natural order of the property nodes. Note that I have scripting installed, so there are a few more property nodes (and the blue box at the top) that you might not have.
PS. Check you signature. The Kudos button is now moved to the left since the forum upgrade.
Attachments:
Example_VI_BD.png ‏4 KB

Problem with the "mail me" button

Since I installed both Iweb 09 and Snow Leopard, there is a problem with the "mail me" buttons on my websites. Nothing happens when i click on it even if i see my web adress when my cursor is on the button.
Do somebody had the same problem and do you know how to avoid it.
Thanks a lot

I checked your site and found that the mail me button was not overlapping or touching any other object and positioned entirely in the footer of the page. All looks good and it works for me. You might try moving the button, logo and counter to the bottom of the page content section, publish and see if that makes a difference for those computers that can't.
Try the following on your Macbook, open Safari, clear the cache (CommandOptionE), load your site and try again. If that makes it work for your MB tell your friends to clear their caches and try again. Might be something as simple as that.

Problem with the progress line in MS Project

Hi there,
I have a question about the progress line in MS Project.
My boss asked me to see how far we were with the work, so I inserted the column '% Complete' and then the progress line.
Now my boss has a problem with the layout and I don't know how the fix it. The problem is at line 43 and 44, where the progress line indicates that we are behind on that group of tasks. But is it possible for the progress line to not indicate it on lines
43 and 44 but only on lines 45 to 50? So my question is if it's possible to make the progress line go down (vertically) over line 43 and 44 instead of jumping to the back?
It would be much more simple if I could insert lines 43 ad 44 as text but not as a task, so that it just counts as a title of some tasks but nothing more than that. Is that possible in Project?
(Lines 45 to 50 are subtasks for line 44, and 44 is a subtask for 43. So line 43 is the main task.)
Normally there was a picture here but I couldn't upload it because my account is not yet verified... So hopefully you can understand the problem with the text.
If anyone could give my some advice or the solution, that would be great!
Thanks in advance!

Hi Thunderbal66--
Basically your activity 43 is late because the sub tasks are also late. Thus MS Project shows the situation by moving the progress line backward. The progress line is automatically displayed based on your project progress, there is no way to manually change
it unless you update your project.
I think the question is not there. This is more a matter of project governance and transparency: why not showin that a project is late when it is late and taking the appropriate corrective actions?
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller |

Error: There is a problem with the file and it cannot be copied

I've been trying to copy (and essentially move) the contents of an NTFS-formatted external HDD to my iMac's internal HDD so I can then format the external HDD to Mac OS Extended. However, when I simply try to drag and drop, I get an error during the transfer that states:
There is a problem with the file and it cannot be copied.
I tried a basic cp command in Terminal to copy all contents of the external HDD to a folder on my iMac's desktop, and found that while there were no errors, there were many individual files missing full chunks of data (ie. original file would be 4GB on my external HDD, but only 350MB on my desktop).
Any ideas on how I can successfully copy a large amount of data (approx. 170GB) from my external HDD to my internal HDD while avoiding this error, so I can ultimately format my external HDD to Mac OS Extended? ANY help is greatly appreciated.

That's not a good error to see. It indicates something is very wrong. Pulled out of an old programming header file:
ioErr = -36, /*I/O error (bummers)*/
If Apple labelled it "bummers," they had a good reason! Unfortunately, that doesn't bode well for you.
Try running Disk Utility again. Keep repairing over and over until one of two things happens: 1) Disk Utility says no repair was needed, or 2) Disk Utility reports the same error in two sequential repair sessions and is unable to repair it both times.
If you hit the second case, or if you hit the first but still can't copy files, then you've got two basic options:
= Buy a third-party disk utility or two and try them. Try TechTool as a first choice.
= Recover what files you can and write the rest off as gone.
= Send your drive to a data recovery service and hope they can extract more than you can.
Of course, none of this is necessary if you have a backup of the contents of that hard drive. (If you don't, this is your learning experience. Once bitten, twice shy, so they say.) Also, regardless of the outcome, once you've got your data or have decided it's gone, you're going to want to wipe that drive completely clean. Reformat the drive with Disk Utility, then when it's done, select the drive in Disk Utility and hit command-i. (Don't select the new volume you just created on that drive, select the drive itself. Mine looks like "232.9 GB Hitachi ..." with the volume name indented underneath.) Look for an item that says S.M.A.R.T. Status, and if it doesn't say Verified, you might as well throw out the drive. Don't trust any more data to it.
If all appears safe, you can start moving data back onto it. But, as always, make sure you have a backup of everything!

MOVED: Problems with the 975X Platinum V2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for