Moving VLAN config from catalyst 2960 to SG300

Dear all,
my existing catalyst 2960 config for vlans:
interface FastEthernet0/2
description 3Com Switch
switchport access vlan 10
switchport mode access
interface FastEthernet0/5
description to Cyberoam
switchport mode trunk
interface FastEthernet0/18
switchport access vlan 40
switchport mode access
interface FastEthernet0/19
interface FastEthernet0/20
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode access
interface FastEthernet0/21
interface FastEthernet0/22
interface Vlan1
no ip address
no ip route-cache
interface Vlan10
ip address 192.168.0.51 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
Inside trunk there are VLAN10 (native), VLAN20,30,40
now, when I try to configure the same on SG300 I get trunk issues - no VLAN10 (native) inside trunk.
Regards
GN

Hi Mlechte, I cheated on your question a bit. I have used two SG300-52 switches. I am able to accomplish what you're asking with these models.
On my master switch the configuration fundamental is simple. For argument sake, I disabled all CDP. I create vlan 100 for voice. Assigned my voice vlan 100. I enabled LLDP on every port. I enabled every optional TLV on every individual port.
I then connected a 100% factory default SG300-52 to the 'master switch'. After about 3 minutes the VSDP created the voice vlan, the link between switches became 1u, 100t. The vlan database populated the vlan 100 and everything just worked nicely.
So, to answer your inquiry, if your 2960 supports the same TLVs it should work okay.
I do recommend you use the SX300 series, it is a much more robust switch, supports full CLI and has a lot better feature set. A SG300-08 (srw2008-k9-na) is around $250. The SG200-08 is about a $100 cheaper. The difference between models is astronomical and a much better investment.
Please review
console_log_master <--This is the switch that will advertise to the downstream
console_log_receive <-- This is a default switch that received the LLDP information
-Tom
Please rate helpful posts

Similar Messages

Dot1x from catalyst 2960 to rsa

My infrastructure:
- Windows Vista or XP PC
- Catalyst 2960
- RSA Authentication Manager 7.1 with radius server
I'm trying to authenticate my clients through RSA secureid but it doesn't work...
If I try radius authentication with a test client it works properly...
My switch is configured (interesting parts):
aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
dot1x system-auth-control
interface GigabitEthernet0/4
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x port-control auto
radius-server host 10.242.5.63 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 key 7 <removed>
radius-server source-ports 1645-1646
I've read some documents about this, and I've tried all tyoe of authentication, I think that correct auth is Cisco PEAP-GTC
Anyone has a working configuration?
Thanks
Daniele

With RSA you need to set GTC and no other authentication protocol will work.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_soft/csacs4nt/acs32/user02/o.htm#wp623530
Regards,
~JG
Do rate helpful posts

Config view for VLAN config is not supported

Hi folks,
I have the following error when I try to view the VLAN config from RME->ConfigManagement->Version Tree.
"Config view for VLAN config is not supported"
I didn't found any information over the RME and Campus documentation.
Anybody know what kind of error I'm issuing
Thanks and Regards.
Leonardo

Hi Pablo,
The VLAN.dat file cannot be used to be deployed via CiscoWorks, but it can be done manually:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_resource_manager_essentials/4.3/user/guide/config.html#wp1311740
The problem with viewing the VLAN.dat contents in the config viewer or change audit reports is also mentioned in the link below:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_resource_manager_essentials/4.3/user/guide/chgaud.html#wp1060886
Look for the "Details" row and there you will see the following:
VLAN configurations cannot be compared because they are in binary format. In this case, the Details link will not be available and will be shown as NA.
Hope this helps!

Cisco SG300-28 / SGE2000 / Catalyst 2960

Hello everyone,
I'm looking for switch to accompany Cisco ASA 5520 in data center, with 20+ GE ports and no need for PoE.
I would like to understand the difference between Cisco SG300-28, Cisco SGE2000 and Cisco Catalyst 2960, 2960-C and 2960-S Series (except specific number of ports). As far as I can see the Cisco SGE2000 has 4x SFP and is stackable unlike the SG300 with 2x miniGBIC/SFP, but not much else. Cisco Catalyst 2960 series offers some additional features like USB storage, but I can't imagine I will need that.
Any suggestions?
Thank you
Dan

Hello everyone,
I'm looking for switch to accompany Cisco ASA 5520 in data center, with 20+ GE ports and no need for PoE.
I would like to understand the difference between Cisco SG300-28, Cisco SGE2000 and Cisco Catalyst 2960, 2960-C and 2960-S Series (except specific number of ports). As far as I can see the Cisco SGE2000 has 4x SFP and is stackable unlike the SG300 with 2x miniGBIC/SFP, but not much else. Cisco Catalyst 2960 series offers some additional features like USB storage, but I can't imagine I will need that.
Any suggestions?
Thank you
Dan

How do I add a Subnet and vlan with a catalyst 3550 and RV120

Hello Friends.
I have a scenario that i'm hoping i can get some help with. I'll be as detailed and descriptive as i can.
This is for a business with 100 employees nodes and 100 camera nodes all needing IP internet through private addressing and public gateway.
I have a business class gateway with a private range of 12 public addresses. Ther modem does nothing but act as a gateway since i have disabled the firewall and DHCP.
In place of the firewall and DCHP from the modem i have installed a RV120 Firewall with VPN. When installing i replicated the IP scheme of the modem as to not disturb and distrup the devices assigned addresses from that scheme from the modem. I did this because the owner could not have any down time or any disruption to the business operations.
The RV120 now acts as firewall , DHCP , and VPN. I'll address the subnet first. I's using 10.0.0.0/24 subnet range.
DHCP is assigning 10.1.10.50 - 10.1.10.100 the rest are static and i plan to use static DHCP with the IP and MAC assigned to each static DHCP address.
There are 100 cameras with static IP addresses in the range of 10.1.10.11 - 10.1.10.40, and 10.1.0.1.101 - 10.1.10.170.
VPN uses PPTP assigned address 10.1.10.6 - 10.1.10.10.
There are no layer 3 switches that i know of. Just a layer two that is the primary swith and ports have run out, and various out of the box switches and wireless access points connected to the primary switch.
I want to implement subnets into the network and VLANS as well on a new Layer 3 switche from cisco. Thinking 3550 from Cisco or one of the older layer 2 switches with layer three capabilities.
I also want to introduce a 192.168.0.0/24 IP range for the existing wireless network and segment the traffic from the rest of the traffic on other ranges.
I want to replace the 10.0.0.0/24 DHCP alltogether and the static addresses for end user nodes on the same network, but keep that range just for camera nodes segmented.
I want to implement a NEW end user IP range and VLAN for employee/guest networks using the 172.16.0.0/24 range.
Iv'e thought of replacing all the wireless nodes with RV120's and use VLAN. Dont know if that strategy works. Need to think it through.
I want the 192.168.0.0/24 IP range comunicate to with the 172.16.0.0/24 and possibly the 10.0.0.0/24 range.
Any advice on how to do this?
As a side note the next step after this is to install a server domain controller as all the computers are all stand alones in their own workgroups. It's a simultaneous project that will introdue a DCHP, WINS, DNS server.

Hi Omid, it sounds like you're proposing the 3550 switch but you're not decided yet. The 3550 switch is a pretty old device and needs enhanced multilayer image. It may be more prudent to use a more current switch such as small business SG300 or SG500 as the feature set is more rich and it supports around 480 LAN connections.
To answer the inquiry, the RV120W, when you create a VLAN it will automatically create an IP interface. From this you may assign subnet as you like along with 'enable or disable' for inter vlan routing. Since the RV120W has this feature, a layer 3 switch is not required unless you are looking to keep the routing load smaller by routing locally with the switch.
With Catalyst or a small business switch you would need to create a VLAN. After creating the VLAN, on a Catalyst you can simply issue "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q" on the desired interface and all VLAN will passage without issue. For a port connecting a user "switchport mode access" "native vlan xx" This will assign the port as untag member of the desired VLAN.
If using a small business switch, it is slightly different, you still create the VLAN but the command issue is a bit different "switchport trunk allowed vlan add xx" for the link to the router, where xx = the VLAN ID to tag to the router. For access client it remains the same as Catalyst.

802.1x on Cisco Catalyst 2960

I am trying to enable 802.1x on one of
the switchports of the Cisco Catalyst
2960:
C2960#sh run | i radius
aaa authentication login test group radius local
aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
radius-server host 10.250.97.26 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813
radius-server source-ports 1645-1646
radius-server key 123456
C2960#sh run | i dot
aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
dot1x system-auth-control
dot1x guest-vlan supplicant
dot1x critical eapol
C2960#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
C2960(config)#int g0/14
C2960(config-if)#dot1x ?
% Unrecognized command
C2960(config-if)#dot1x
As you can see, I can not enable 802.1x
at the interface level. The code is am running is 12.2.25SEE4:
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
* 1 24 WS-C2960G-24TC-L 12.2(25)SEE4 C2960-LANBASEK9-M
System image file is "flash:c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-25.SEE4.bin"
According to Cisco, this image supports
802.1x. Why can't enable it at the
interface level?
Can someone help me out? Thanks.

some additional info:
C2960#sh dot1x all
Sysauthcontrol Enabled
Dot1x Protocol Version 2
Critical Recovery Delay 100
Critical EAPOL Enabled
C2960#

Catalyst 2960 vs 3750

Long time reader here but first time poster. I am looking into upgrading our network switches soon and I'm trying to decide on a design now. Let me give some background information on the network.
Currently we have a Catalyst 5513 with a Supervisor II, ten 24 port 10/100 cards and a 12 port fiber card installed. There are also two 48 port Alcatel switches that are uplinked to the 5500 as well as six Catalyst 2900XLs (on the factory floor) uplinked to it via fiber. There are about 40 servers and 350clients in total in the building. All servers and most of the clients in the office are connected directly to the 5513. We will be consolidating buildings soon and plan on adding another 200 devices to the network (office and factory floor area).
I was thinking we should get two Catalyst 3750G-48TS and a 3750G-12S in a stack for the core switch. Then use Catalyst 2960-48TC-L switches uplinked to the 3570 stack for the access layer. Does this make more sense than directly connecting all the clients and servers directly to the 3570 stack? What would be the advantages/disadvantages of each setup besides cost?
Thanks for any help you can provide!

I tend to go with a more modular approach and hang nothing off my core except otehr switches. Put your servers on their own switches as well. There are a few reason i do it this way.
The first is I run two cores for redunacy. by giving servers their own access layer switch, i can isolate them from a core failure.
Second, ports on a core switch tend to be more expensive. I know I'm going to be adding servers in the next few years. Its cheaper for me to buy more 3560's then more blades for a 6500.
Third, modularity. I can make more changes to either the core, or edge switches and not effect the other. Say you find out down the road, that the 3750 stack isnt quite moving the number of packets you need. If you plug end users and servers into your core now, just picture how much of a bear it will be to replace the core. Always try to go the route that will give you maximum flexibility and growth.

Can't see Catalyst 2960 48TT

I had to connect a new Catalyst 2960 48TT switch to my Network. Which is connected straight to port two in Catalyst 3750G 48+4. I have three other already connected: 2 x Catalyst 2960 48TT and 1 Catalyst 2960 48TC.
The problem is I can not see the newly connected switch in Cisco Network Assistant. I see the other two switches but not the new one.
I have couple of computers connected to the new switch which are working fine.
I changed the main cables which go from 3750G to the other switches.
The network is working fine, the connected compuetrs have internet...
Can someone please help...?

....Port Settings, on the 3750G(port 2)...
(ALL the ports are set correctly, on all the switches)
Status: enable
Duplex: auto
speed: auto
PortFast: enable when static access
Flow ctrl: off
Auto MDIX: on
VLAN SETTINGS:
Administrative port: 802.1Q Trunk
trunk allowed VLAN:1,2,5,10,15,20.....
Pruning VLAN: 2-1001
Native VLAN: 1

SNMP, Query dot1dStpPortState on Catalyst 2960-S

Hi Community,
I would like to be able to query the dot1dStpPortState obect on the Catalyst 2960-S on our LAN . Im running firmware
c2960s-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE2.bin and according to the Cisco SNMP Object Navigator the object is supported (via the BRIDGE-MIB).
However when i query using snmpwalk from my workstation :
snmpwalk -v 2c -c bic-zua-ro 10.u.y.x 1.3.6.1.2.1.17.2.15.1.3
I recieve and error .
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.2.15.1.3 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID
For the sake of comparison, querying our 4700 :
snmpwalk -v 2c -c bic-zua-ro 10.u.y.x 1.3.6.1.2.1.17.2.15.1.3
returns (as expected, cropped)
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.2.15.1.3.1 = INTEGER: 5
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.2.15.1.3.3 = INTEGER: 5
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.2.15.1.3.40 = INTEGER: 5
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.2.15.1.3.67 = INTEGER: 5
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.2.15.1.3.104 = INTEGER: 5
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.2.15.1.3.257 = INTEGER: 5
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.2.15.1.3.258 = INTEGER: 5
SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.2.15.1.3.259 = INTEGER: 5
Is there some special configuration i need to do on our 2960's. The only snmp related settings i can see in the running config is snmp-server community. In this case :
snmp-server community bic-zua-ro RO
Thanks in advance for any comments/ assistance.
Rgds
Ian

Hi Vinod,
Wow, thanks for your prompt reply. Output from filtered running config pasted below
TVS-Stack17#sh run | inclu snmp
snmp-server community bic-zua-ro RO
Interestingly when i walk the entire dot1dBridge (1.3.6.1.2.1.17) i recieve lots of data from both dot1dBase (1) and dot1dTp (4) but nothing from dot1dStp (2)
I tried portAdditionalOperStatus and did not recieve any response but got lots of data from its patent portEntry (1)
Running show spann on the 2960 stack i can see various ports in forwarding and blocking start as i would expect.
Rgds,
Ian

Vlan database vs vlan config, rpr-plus...

We have Catalysts 6500's that we are migrating to native ios mode, and have noticed in the docs (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800da705.html#wp1095579) that vlan configurations made from the vlan database mode are NOT replicated throught rpr-plus.
While configuration of vlans through the global config mode isn't really a problem for future configs, we haven't found a way to easiliy convert vlan database configs to vlan-config...
Is there such a way besides clearing vlan.dat and starting over?
Also, after doing a clean config of vlans through vlan-config, there doesn't seem to be much (any?) diffrence either in the global config or the presence of the vlan.dat. Is the config supposed to look any diffrent when issued as vlan-config?
TIA

check out the following link on configuring vlans :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008007e711.html#wp1020848

Catalyst 2960 for my LAN WS-c2960-48TC-S vs WS-c2960-48TC-L

Hello
I want buy a Catalyst 2960 but i don't now which is great for my situation.
Model : WS-c2960-48TC-S (LAN Lite - 400 euro) vs WS-c2960-48TC-L (LAN Base - 900 euro) the difference of price is half.
I need 3 VLAN (2 VLANs with data and other VLAN (3th only voice).All security options want applied on ports.(MAC,ACCESS..etc)
Between switch and router will be a TRUNK channel...
The network design parts: lan printers - 4, desktop - 16, phone IP - 10.
I have only ISP .
So..what i need? LAN Lite or LAN Base
Another question: In LAN Lite i have all commands?
thank's

Q. What are the advantages of Cisco Catalyst 2960 Series Switches with the LAN Base software relative to Cisco Catalyst 2960 Series Switches with the LAN Lite software?
A. Cisco Catalyst 2960 LAN Base switches deliver intelligent services for branch offices and wiring closets. The LAN Base IOS software supports enhanced Layer 2+ security, quality of service (QoS), availability, and scalable management to enable new converged applications. Catalyst 2960 LAN Base switches include both 10/100 Fast Ethernet and 10/100/1000 Gigabit Ethernet connectivity in 8-, 24-, and 48-port configurations.
Cisco Catalyst 2960 LAN Lite switches are for entry-level branch office and wiring closet networks. They simplify the migration from nonintelligent hubs and unmanaged switches to a fully scalable and reliable network. The LAN Lite IOS software supports standard Layer 2 security, QoS, and availability while lowering the network total cost of ownership. Catalyst 2960 LAN Lite switches deliver 10/100 Fast Ethernet connectivity in 24- and 48-port configurations.
All Cisco Catalyst 2960 Series Switches have technical support service options available through Cisco SMARTNet ® service. All come with a Limited Lifetime Hardware Warranty, and LAN Base and LAN Lite software updates are provided at no additional cost.
Information came from the below link:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-2960-series-switches/prod_qas0900aecd80322c37.html
Will all commands be available? No...if they were then what would be the point of having different software levels? Will the switch meet all basic to intermediate needs? Yes. If you are looking for a set of specific commands to see if they are available then check out the command reference tools available from Cisco.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/switches/catalyst-2960-series-switches/products-command-reference-list.html

Catalyst 2960 - IBM/Cisco IGESM - Trunk port configuration

Good day all!
I am new in Cisco world and try to configure a trunk between a Catalyst 2960 switch and a IBM Blade Center IGESM switch (manifactured by Cisco).
Unfortunately, it seems that the network traffic doesn't cross the trunk link.
I have followed (at least, I think so) the instructions given on the different Cisco documentation papers but I can't find the mistake in my configuration (lack of experience :-( !).
Both switches are using IOS. 2960 uses IOS 12.2(25)FX and IGESM uses IOS 12.2(22)EA8.
The ports are connected through a cross-over cable Cat5e.
Please find below the configuration for each ports:
Catalyst 2960:
Name: Gi0/1
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: trunk
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Negotiation of Trunking: On
Access Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Administrative Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Voice VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk private VLANs: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Trunking VLANs Enabled: 1,99,200
Pruning VLANs Enabled: 2-1001
Capture Mode Disabled
Capture VLANs Allowed: ALL
Protected: false
Unknown unicast blocked: disabled
Unknown multicast blocked: disabled
Appliance trust: none
IBM/Cisco IGESM:
Name: Gi0/20
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: trunk
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Negotiation of Trunking: On
Access Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Voice VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk private VLANs: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Trunking VLANs Enabled: 1,99,200
Pruning VLANs Enabled: 2-1001
Capture Mode Disabled
Capture VLANs Allowed: ALL
Protected: false
Unknown unicast blocked: disabled
Unknown multicast blocked: disabled
Appliance trust: none
For my test, I try to ping a blade (connected to IGESM) in VLAN 200 from a workstation connected to Catalyst 2960 (in VLAN 200 too). From a network anaylser (ethereal), I can see the ARP broadcast from each side but none are going across the trunk link.
I am a bit lost about this problem and would be grateful for any assistance in solving it!
Many, many thanks in advance for your time!
Best regards,
Fabian

Hi Glen!
Both switches (Catalyst 2960 & IGESM) are brand new and most ports are still reflecting manufacturer's default configuration. Vlan 2 is the default native vlan for IGESM ports (excluding ports used for switch management which use vlan 1 as most Cisco switches).
I changed the native vlan for g0/5 on IGESM to 200. Now, ports g0/5 (access mode) and g0/20 (trunk mode) are on native vlan 200. On g0/5 is installed Windows 2003 instance (firewall disabled). The only purpose is to receive and send ping request to test connectivity.
My workstation is connected to 2960 switch on port fa0/1 (please find the configuration below). I can successfully ping other vlan 200 machines connected on the same switch. For testing purpose, I try to ping the blade machine connected on port g0/5 on IGESM.
Configuration of fa0/1:
Name: Fa0/1
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: dynamic auto
Operational Mode: static access
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: native
Negotiation of Trunking: On
Access Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Administrative Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Voice VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk private VLANs: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Trunking VLANs Enabled: ALL
Pruning VLANs Enabled: 2-1001
Capture Mode Disabled
Capture VLANs Allowed: ALL
Protected: false
Unknown unicast blocked: disabled
Unknown multicast blocked: disabled
Appliance trust: none
Is there any other information I could provide to better help you to understand the configuration?
Cheers!
Fabian

Troubleshooting Fiber Connection on a Catalyst 2960

I am trying to test my fiber connectivity on a Catalyst 2960 before I deploy it. So what I thought I would do is connect it to another switch in my office with a open port for the fiber connection. The other switch is a Catalyst 3560G. Here are the port configurations:
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100
switchport mode trunk
macro description cisco-switch
interface GigabitEthernet0/25
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,100
switchport mode trunk
The first one is the catalyst 2960 and the 3560G is the second.
When you show the interface for each of these it shows that it recognizes the media but the line protocal and the GigbitEthernet Port is down.
Any Ideas?

Sorry... a fiber optic cable with a connector on each end.
To aid in troubleshooting, many times we loopback the signal back to the originating device. An optical loopback is just connecting the transmit (Tx) to the receive (Rx).
The multimode SFP/GBIC transceiver you are using will allow you to directly connect the Transmit and Receive ports without damage to the unit. This should provide you with a green link LED.
If so, then you can reconnect your fibers and loopback (connect the two fibers together) at the far end of the fiber link (use an optical adapter) and see if you get a green LED.

Bandwidth monitoring on a Catalyst 2960

Hello all, I'm working with two Catalyst 2960 switches and I would like to know if there is a way to monitor bandwidth on individual ports. Ideally I would like to have one graph showing a bandwidth usage reading on each port. I tried using the Network Assistant to accomplish this, but I was only able to view one port at a time. I also tried using a traffic graphing program from Paessler, but a MIB file is needed to allow the program to connect to the switch. When I ran a search on the network management page the 2960 was not on the list for MIB supported products. Is this type of graph possible to do? Or is there a more effective way to accomplish what I would like to do. Any ideas or suggestions would be helpful.

Hi, we have just swapped all our avaya switches with catalyst 2960 (12, 24 and 48 ports) and 3750 (48 ports with 10gig module).
How do I find what port I should monitor for bandwith graphs?
Target[10.0.0.22_loc1]: 1:@10.0.0.22:

Catalyst 2960 SF Stacking

Hi
I am stacking 6 Catalyst 2960 SF Series PoE 48 ports, I am using the Bladestack cable. I plug it in from 1 to 2 on all the switches. If I look at the lights it shows 4 in on group and 2 in another. If I do a show switch detail it shows the following
Switch/Stack Mac Address : 44ad.d982.a100
                                           H/W   Current
Switch# Role   Mac Address     Priority Version State
1       Member 5006.0425.7e00     1      1       Ready
*2       Master 44ad.d982.a100     1      1       Ready
3       Member 5006.0435.bc00     1      1       Waiting
4       Member 5006.04d8.7000     1      1       Ready
         Stack Port Status             Neighbors
Switch# Port 1     Port 2           Port 1   Port 2
1       Down        Ok              None       2
2        Ok         Ok                4        1
4       Down        Ok              None       2

Hi , i think only four 2960 SF switches can be stacked into a singe logical switch.
Please refer the link , hope this helps:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/white_paper_c11-578928.html

Moving VLAN config from catalyst 2960 to SG300

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for