MPLS Collapsed PE-CE multihoming

Hello Netpros,
Here's the sample scenario:
- plain MPLS network (MPBGP + OSPF) with VRF VPNs
- VRF XXX configured say on PE1,PE2,PE3
- PE1 and PE2 are colocated in the same site: there is a a transit vlan to communicate with a couple of firewalls, mapped to VRF XXX; no CEs, just HSRP/VRRP and static routic redistributed in MPBGP
How can I force PE3 (remote site) to choose PE1 as best path to reach the Firewalls, for the single VRF XXX ?
Hope it's clear, thanks a lot
Andrea

Hello Andrea,
you should be able to apply a route-map in the vpnv4 address-family where:
you check the IP BGP next-hop= PE1 loopback
and
you check route-target = that of VRF XXX
and you set local-preference to 200
access-list 11 permit host PE1-loop
ip
route-map rise-preference permit 10
match ip next-hop 11
match route-target extcommunity 12
set local-preference 200
! empty final block to accept all other
! vpnv4 routes unchanged
route-map rise-preference permit 20
router bgp XX
address-family vpnv4
neigh RRS route-map rise-preference in
this setup should work also with a RRS in the middle unless PE2 is preferred by RRS.
Use different RDs on PE1 and PE2 to be sure routes of both are propagated in the domain.
Hope to help
Giuseppe

Similar Messages

  • MPLS VPN load sharing when multihoming

    Any one know of best practices for outbound load balancing when multihoming to 2 different service providers in an mpls vpn.
    I have referred to this document (http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/40.html) which states the only way to do this is by assigning metrics/weights to a certain range of prefixes learned from one provider, hence load sharing.
    Turning up bgp multipath on the CE would be optimal but since AS PATHs are different the best path selection will be different. Could we possibly turn of best path selection for AS paths (bgp bestpath as-path ignore) and make multipath work? Would that install 2 routes for the same prefix in the RIB?
    Thanks
    Ariful Huq

    Yes you can turn off best path selection for AS path and have multipath work. For a route to be populated in routing table BGP has various metrics for its selection. AS path is one of the metrics it uses for best route selection, so I dont think there should be any problem with it.

  • Multihoming Primary/Backup PE MPLS VPN

    Hi there,
    I kind of stuck of implementing and configuring Primary/Backup scenario for MPLS VPN enviroment.
    Currently, only singe CE router connected to 2 PE router, Primary PE and Backup PE in the same POP.
    PE-CE IGP is running OSPF. On CE router prespective, how do I achieve primary/backup scenario and on other remote PE, how does MPLS VPN cloud noticed that there is Primary and Backup PE towords this CE router?
    Any configuration or sample out there? Appreciate for the help.
    regards,
    maher

    Hello Maher,
    I would try to set the interface metric to a higher value for the backup PE. With OSPF->BGP redistribution you should then get a higher MED in BGP making the path less preferable. Example:
    interface Serial0/0
    description to primary PE
    ip ospf cost 100
    interface Serial0/1
    description to backup PE
    ip ospf cost 1000
    Alternatively you could modify the MED while redistributiing into BGP:
    router bgp 65000
    address-family ipv4 vrf VRFname
    redistribute ospf 123 vrf VRFname match internal external route-map OSPF2BGP
    route-map OSPF2BGP permit 10
    set metric 10000
    Hope this helps! Please rate all posts.
    Regards, Martin

  • Load-balancing in MPLS Core

    How is load-balancing achieved in MPLS L3 vpns and equal cost multiple links exist to reach egress PE along with per-destination load-balancing enabled on interfaces.
    I have tried to simulate the network below
    Ingress PE--->P1--->>P2--->Egress PE
    Multiple equal cost links exist between P1 and P2, cisco platform,LDP, IGP-ospf being used.

    Hi,
    Destination based load balancing in MPLS L3VPNs can be categorized into two scenarios:
    1) multiple pathes between two PE routers
    2) multiple access links to a single CE or site
    Your question as I understand it was about the first scenario. So let me first quickly review how customer traffic is forwarded between VRFs on two different PE routers.
    The VRF routing table will have BGP entries for the routes learned from the remote PE usually with next hop addresses being the remote PE loopback IP used for PE-to-PE BGP peering.
    The traffic will be forwarded across P routers using the label for the BGP next hop.
    Thus the load balancing accross the MPLS core in a first step is decided by the IGP, which has to insert several equal cost pathes into the global routing table for the BGP next hop networks (PE loopbacks).
    Side note: MPLS traffic engineering in the core would allow for unequal cost load balancing.
    The decision, which labeled packet to send across which path in the core is done by CEF using a hash algorithm. To achieve the same load balancing as with unlabeled IP traffic, a Cisco MPLS enabled router will look for the bottom label - the one with bottom-of-stack bit set to 1 - and try to determine, if the transported packet behind the bottom label is IP. If so, the hash is calculated for the customer IP header like for normal IP traffic. This ensures all traffic for a certain customer destination will always go through the same path. No unwanted packet reordering will occur.
    Be aware, that the customer IP packet header will only be used for CEF hash calculation, no IP lookup will be performed, as core routers in MPLS L3VPNs do not have any knowledge about customer addresses.
    As a side note: if the traffic transported is not IP (e.g. Ethernet over MPLS), the bottom label will be used for the CEF load balancing (e.g. the VC label).
    For the second scenario - CE load balancing with multihomed CE/sites - it is first required to have two equal cost entries in the VRF routing tables. The difference will be the two different PE BGP next hop addresses. The first load balancing decision is the performed by CEF based on the IP packet received by the CE and the VRF routing table entries. Once CEF decided, which VRF entry to use, the required BGP next hop label (and the VPN label) is applied and the packet is transported across the MPLS core. load balancing there is done as described above.
    Hope this helps! Please rate all posts.
    Regards, Martin

  • An MPLS Cloud

    Hi,
    I'm looking at a topology where a number of collapsed PE/P nodes (50>100) access a L2 cloud in a full-mesh topology.  The underlying cloud architecture could be something like VPLS from an external provider with the MPLS domain mapped on top.  The attached shows the nodes on the periphery of the cloud and these could be spread globally.  What I'm looking for are pros and cons and whether there is a case study or CVD for this type of topoolgy.  Particular interest is on scalability around IGP, LSP's, sub-optimal routing conditions, IGP/LSP synchronisation, IGP link/domain costs etc...  The network will provision L2/L3 VPN's and other standard MPLS features.
    Thanks, Wayne

    Hi,
    You'd need to implement QOS for sure. What many people do is to have data traffic use precedence/EXP 0 and Voice precedence/EXP 5. You could make the video traffic precedence/EXP 4, for example. This also maps to certain DSCP values.
    You could also consider MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE). There is point-to-point TE for your data traffic, but you could also deploy (check platform and IOS support) point-to-multipoint (p2mp) TE to carry the IP multicast (video) traffic. With TE, you could steer traffic through the network and have fast protection (FRR). You'd still need to use QOS, because MPLS TE does not automatically hook into QOS.
    Regards,
    Luc

  • MPLS Design

    Looking at converting a smaller SP network to MPLS.
    H/W is a 7206VXR w/NPE300
    - 256MB DRAM
    - 20480K bytes of Flash PCMCIA card at slot 0
    - 125440K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 1
    - 4096K bytes of Flash internal SIMM
    Multiple ATM vc supporting
    - ATM - to Frame (CE)
    - ADSL
    - ATM
    - IDSL
    Would run primarily static routes or OSPF/EIGRP as required.
    7206 has approx 50 subinterfaces for various cstomers
    Only selected customers would be migrated to MPLS VPN, others (e.g. those with a single office only) would be routed in a global table
    Assume an initial count of 10-12 vrf instances
    Ref http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk428/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801445fb.shtml#diag
    1. Can I safely collapse the PE1/PE2/P onto a single platform (the 7206)?
    2. IGW is replaced by PIX
    3. Is the NPE300 adequate?
    4. Any potential design issues?

    1. Can I safely collapse the PE1/PE2/P onto a single platform (the 7206)?
    Yes
    3. Is the NPE300 adequate?
    Yes
    4. Any potential design issues?
    only how much traffic you want to run i see NPE300 working fine with 100Mb traffic.
    MPLS-Layer3 VPN do not have much load on resources

  • Implementing MPLS over VLAN trunk

    We are investigation the options of running MPLS between our two core switches (C6509 with dual Sup720s) with the aim of introducing MPLS VPNs. These two core switches are linked via a Layer 2 trunk in a collapsed backbone topology.
    Is it possible to create a point-to-point MPLS-enabled link between these switches on a VLAN interface between these switches, rather than an a dedicated physical port? It is anticipated that these two core switches will be PE routers (also acting as RRs, if required).

    Its possible to run MPLS on any media with IP configurable for it. So till you have IP reachbility on a media, you can run MPLS.
    As in your case you can very well run MPLS on an SVI reachable both sides over a trunk.
    But as a after thought, why do you want to do this, although its possible, why do you want to carry other vlans on the same trunk which also carrier the internconnect vlan for the PE's.
    HTH-Cheers,
    Swaroop

  • Collapsed view: how to see "most recent unread message" instead of "first unread message" in a thread in Mail

    Hey all,
    I use the inbuilt Mail-software on my Macbook with Lion 10.7 and I constantly overlook new messages in a thread, as I organize by conversation and usually have all my threads in 'collapsed view'. For some reason Mail seems to prefer showing the 'first', i.e. the earliest unread message as the one message that I see in collapsed. If there are newer messages already in the thread, I don't see them, unless I un-collapse the thread. I find this really unintuitive and annoying, my inbox seems far more static than it really is.
    Is there any way to change this and have Mail show me the most recent unread message as the message I see in collapsed view?
    I appreciate any advice.
    Thanks, Carl
    PS: BTW, I have the same problem on my iPhone, double props to you if you can solve it for both Mail and iPhone!

    Mail
    Preferences
    Viewing
    Check put most recent message at top

  • Possible to Have ToC Default to Show Only Top Level (collapse sublevels)?

    Howdy!
    I'll bet I'm not the only one wishing for this.  Let's say you're using Captivate 4's Table of Contents feature with a longish movie of Cp slides, which is chunked into bite-size sections content-wise.  In the ToC, though, you can't mimic that same organization scheme; at least, the learner would first need to collapse all the ToC folders you've created so they see only the top-level listing.
    This can be a critical issue:  keeping the at-first-glance list in the ToC brief enough to be inviting to learners, yet allowing learners to drive which details are currently visible.
    A movie's topical hierarchy could be along these lines, for example ...
    Section 1 - National Brands
    What are National Brands?
    Why Are They Important to Our Business?
    Working with Nat. Brands
    Practice Your Knowledge
    Section 2 - International Brands
    What are International Brands?
    Why Are They Important to Our Business?
    Working with Intl. Brands
    Practice Your Knowledge
    You'd like to organize the ToC to show only the section titles (1st level) and to suppress the 2nd-level detail (slide titles) until the learner chooses to expand the folder to see those details.
    I've tried things like grouping the slides into sections in the Storyboard view and organizing the slides into sections strictly within the ToC -- both to no avail.
    Has anyone solved for this need yet?
    I'm all ears, and you'd be doing learners of the world a huge favor.
    Thanks!

    Hi, Jim.
    Thanks for being 'on the case' and looking into this so quickly.  Your
    findings are encouraging, although my user base is generally working with
    IE 6 and FP8 or 9.
    Since the only thing I may influence is getting  IT to help push out FP10,
    I'm hoping it's more of a player- than a browser-version issue.
    I'll test things out by Monday and let you know the results.  Wish me luck!
    Dave
                                                                                    From:       Jim Leichliter <[email protected]>                                                                               
    To:         Dave Tressler <[email protected]>                                                                               
    Date:       03/26/2010 06:02 PM                                                                               
    Subject:    Possible to Have ToC Default to Show Only Top Level (collapse
                  sublevels)?                                                                                
    Dave,
    I just tested this on my local web server and it worked fine.  I created a
    blank project with 8 slides.  Created my TOC with grouping... 2 slides in
    each group.  I turned on self paced learning.  I tried with and without the
    widget and it picked up where I left off in either case.  See
    https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B86WuEq6SVwRNWIwMjhjODctMjE2Yy00MWE2LWI5YzEtMGQxYzNjOWQ0Z mI2&hl=en. 
    I published using FP10 and IE8 to view.  Notice any difference between
    your project and this one?
    Thanks,
    Jim Leichliter

  • In our enterprise MPLS network we are using 192.168.20.0/24 subnet, in this subnet we have not assigned the IP 192.168.20.200/30 & 204/30, But still these subnets are reachable . Are these NNI IP ...Please explain.

    In our enterprise MPLS network we are using 192.168.20.0/24 subnet, in this subnet we have not assigned the IP 192.168.20.200/30 & 204/30, But still these subnets are reachable . Are these NNI IP ...Please explain.

    I have checked with ISP, there response is like below:
    Those are the NNI to GBNET IPs for Dominican Republic. They are Network IPs. You should be able to ping them-that means they are working.
    WANRT01#show  ip route | include 192.168.20.20
    B        192.168.20.200/30 [20/0] via 192.168.20.226, 02:18:29
    B        192.168.20.204/30 [20/0] via 192.168.20.226, 02:18:29
    Here its shows from any of our MPLS site we are able to trace the IP and it seems like, 192.168.20.204/30 is one more site but in actual its not.
    INMUMWANRT01#ping 192.168.20.205
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.20.205, timeout is 2 seconds:
    Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 224/232/260 ms
    INMUMWANRT01#trace              
    INMUMWANRT01#traceroute 192.168.20.205
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Tracing the route to 192.168.20.205
    VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
      1 192.168.20.226 24 msec 24 msec 24 msec
      2 192.168.20.206 [AS 8035] 232 msec 232 msec 252 msec
      3 192.168.20.205 [AS 8035] 224 msec 224 msec *

  • Java3d speed collapse caused by other java apps running at the same time

    Hi
    I am programming a flightsimulator for some months.
    The current state is online available (all free, no copyrights)
    at http://www.snowraver.org/efcn/efcnsim/index.htm
    especially the sample (source) which shows the
    behaviour which is the reason for my post is here
    http://www.snowraver.org/efcn/efcnsim/page2.htm
    My Problem:
    When I start the sim while two other java programs
    ( one is a server running localhost, one is a client )
    are running, the speed of the flightsim is very slow,
    one frame update takes 3 to 5 seconds.
    ( 3 java.exe's in task list plus 1 which is the IDE )
    When I start the flightsim ALONE, I have 30 to 40 frames per second.
    ( 2 java.exe's in the task list = the flightsim and the IDE -> no prob here )
    That means, the flightsim is about 100 times slower, when
    started while the other two apps are running.
    BUT the other two applications do almost ***NOTHING***, the
    CPU load is 1 or 2 percent.
    Of course they have threads running, but all are waiting
    for a signal - no thread really consumes CPU power.
    Interestingly, when I FIRST start the flightsim and AFTER THIS
    start the two other applications, the flightsim
    holds 30 frames per seconds without problems, even
    though the other applications consume some CPU power
    until they have completely started up.
    Configurations:
    JSDK 1.4.2_1 , 0_2..
    Java3D 1.3.1 OPENGL (The DirectX version crashes with D3D device lost)
    Win2000,XP CPU 800MHz upto 3 GHz
    In my point of view, the java3d thread scheduler makes
    some funny decisions when it starts up, which lead
    to the order dependent behaviour described above.
    My question is, if anyone has some ideas, how I could
    get away from this speed collapse.
    The problem is caused in native code I guess.
    I also could imagine, that it has to do something with
    the order in which one creates, attaches and starts
    the Canvas3D. (? could produce race conditions)
    The flightsim runs in full retained mode. Of course
    the CPU work in the behaviours is rather big, because
    the ROAM triangulation update (..) is done there
    and the triangles are recalculated and passed
    ( all BY_REFERENCE ).
    Or could it have to do something with the memory
    consumption ( when all runs, almost all of
    the 512MB RAM is taken by the three java.exe's ) ?
    Any hints or ideas ?

    :) No, Sun does handle it [lol]
    I just have tested it on my computer at work
    ( 3GHz HP compaq, 1GB Ram and a Intel 82865G Graphics
    Card with 64MB memory, Windows XP )
    and it has worked without problems any way I tried.
    ( Except for xclusive fullscreen mode, but I guess, the administrators
    have deactivated it somehow, so we don't play games at work :)
    I couldn't test it under Linux so far, but I think, this will be less
    problematic than Windows [usually].
    However my current assumption is:
    I totally have forgot the [limited] videocard memory.
    I suppose, Java3D tries to put all triangle data and all
    textures to the videocards memory, so most data processing
    then can be passed to it's graphiccard CPU using
    OpenGL commands.
    Now the flightsim produces a varying amount of (by_reference) triangle data ( a few thousands )
    and has some texture maps for the terrain, the sea and other things,
    plus indexed triangle data for the planes and ships.
    The notebook system, which slows down has an ATI Mobile Radeon card
    with only 32MB RAM onboard, whereas the others have 64MB Ram.
    An additional pointer to that theory is that I can trigger the slowdown by resizing
    the flightsim window, while it is running.
    On the notebook, it holds 30fps, until the window exceeds a size of 962*862 pixels.
    At this size the speed collapses and goes down to 1 frame update every 4 seconds.
    If I make the window a few pixels smaller, the speed of 30fps immediately
    is there again.
    Therefore I guess, some data passed to the graphic cards memory depends
    linearly from the canvas3d's window dimension, and at some limit,
    the graphiccard's memory is too small and Java3D changes it's strategy
    and performs most calculations on the computer's mainmemory,
    which of course is a lot slower.
    I'm not very sure about that, I'm just speculating.
    Next thing I will try is to disable directdraw for the other two applications,
    possibly swing also uses graphicscard memory, when directdraw is enabled.
    The solution seems to be clear anyway: The flightsim must examine the system
    and set some parameters depending on the machine's capabilities.
    Onboard videagraphic ram is one of them. If it's too slow, I start to decrease
    the window size and expect to see a sudden increase of speed, as soon as
    the rendering can be done by the graphicscard CPU. If this never happens,
    I assume no OpenGL accelerator is present on that system. This can be seen as a method
    for finding out the amount of videocard memory on a system by trial and error ..?:)
    Thanks for your tips, Alain.
    I especially have to check out the data sharing class in 1.5.

  • Forms 6.0.8 Multihomed?

    Current setup:
    - WinNT 4 SP5
    - Developer 6.0 installed first (DEFAULT_HOME)
    - Oracle 8.1.5 installed into it's own home
    - OAS 4.0.8.1 installed into it's own home
    I do not want to upgrade my Dev 6.0 - I would prefer to just install the beta Forms 6.0.8 into it's own home so I can test it separately.
    The Reports 6i Release Notes state in section 2.1 that "Developer 6i must be installed into the default home". Section 2.4.1 goes on to state that "Developer 6.0 and 6i CANNOT co-exist in the same $ORACLE_HOME".
    I spoke with Tech support a couple of weeks back and they led me to believe that Dev6i is multihomed. Are the Release Notes correct? Do I HAVE to install Dev6i into the default $ORACLE_HOME?
    Thanx - any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Forms 6i is Forms 6.0.8 and is web enabled.
    Frank

  • How to Collapse Tracks in Arrange Window?

    I've been searching this and some other forums, and have a feeling I'm outta luck, but figured I should post a question here before writing up another Feature Request...
    Separate from the Hide Track function (which isn't quite what I'm wanting), and separate from creating region-based Folders (which I've only just begun to explore), is there no way to simply designate groups of Tracks in the Arrange window, and then be able to collapse or reveal that particular group with a single click -- in the same way that a folder's contents can be collapsed or revealed in Finder list view?
    I'm currently building a Logic project which draws on bits and pieces from 3-4 dozen .aif files, each of which I'm dragging onto a separate Track, and then on each Track am splitting the content into multiple Regions. I'm using color-coding of those individual Regions, along with text labelling, to help distinguish between different kinds of content. I'll then be copying specific Regions down to new Tracks, from which several different composite versions of the material will be outputted.
    All this means I'm going to end up with a LOT of Tracks, and it would be a huge organizational help if I could easily collapse/reveal different groups of Tracks at different times, so I was only having to see and scroll through the relevant ones.
    But am I correct in understanding that while some of Logic's competitors have this kind of feature, Logic itself -- astoundingly -- does not???
    Bracing myself for the bad news,
    John Bertram
    Toronto

    Bee Jay wrote:
    The nearest you can do is pack the tracks into a folder, and delete the source tracks, you you end up with only one folder track in the top level, and you can go "into" the folder to see the tracks and contents of it, and come back out again.
    I didn't realize there was the option to delete the source tracks but retain the Folder -- perhaps I'll explore that.
    But am I correct in understanding that while some of Logic's competitors have this
    kind of feature, Logic itself -- astoundingly -- does not???
    Well, not every piece of software has every feature imaginable - and this hasn't stopped people making music with Logic.
    In order to implement this, you'd probably have to introduce some kind of track group which would be similar to region folders ("track folders") in order to group like tracks and therefore fold and unfold the track folders' contents - but this might start to get confusing to have two different, but similar functions in the arrange page.
    I admit, "astounding" was just me venting. But the hypothetical implementation you describe is exactly what I was hoping to find. As for potential confusion, perhaps they'd need to avoid the word "folder", and call them "track groups", or something like that. But I think it would be an extremely useful organizational tool for those projects where your Tracks start numbering in the several dozens. (Plus it would allow the user to re-position a whole group of Tracks in one move, rather than having to select, drag, and position each Track one at a time.)
    Sounds like Feedback Time, once again ('guess it beats doing actual work!).
    Thanks very much for the well-considered reply.
    jb

  • Windows Phone Hub with more than 2 sections causes ArgumentException when collapsing any section

    Hi there,
    I'm working on a Universal app which is using a Hub control to display different sections.
    On startup, I want to hide some of the sections. Using a button, I want to toggle between the visible sections using a binding property on the Visibility property (Handled in the ViewModel). In my ViewModel I have 2 boolean properties that are bound to the
    corresponding sections and are converted to Visibility using a BooleanToVisibilityConverter
    <Hub>
    <HubSection>
    <DataTemplate>
    <Button Content="Test" Command="{Binding SwitchVisibilityCommand}"/>
    </DataTemplate>
    </HubSection>
    <HubSection x:Name="First" Header="Test1A" Visibility="{Binding ElementName=pageRoot,
    Path=DataContext.FirstVisibleProperty, Converter={StaticResource ResourceKey=BooleanToVisibilityConverter} }"/>
    <HubSection x:Name="Second" Header="Test1B" Visibility="{Binding ElementName=pageRoot,
    Path=DataContext.SecondVisibleProperty, Converter={StaticResource ResourceKey=BooleanToVisibilityConverter} }"/>
    <HubSection x:Name="Third" Header="Test2A" Visibility="{Binding ElementName=pageRoot,
    Path=DataContext.ThirdVisibleProperty, Converter={StaticResource ResourceKey=BooleanToVisibilityConverter} }"/>
    <HubSection x:Name="Fourth" Header="Test2B" Visibility="{Binding ElementName=pageRoot,
    Path=DataContext.FourthVisibleProperty, Converter={StaticResource ResourceKey=BooleanToVisibilityConverter} }"/>
    </Hub>
    public class MainPageViewModel : ViewModel, IMainPageViewModel
    private bool firstVisibleProperty;
    private bool secondVisibleProperty;
    public MainPageViewModel()
    FirstVisibleProperty = true;
    SecondVisibleProperty = false;
    SwitchVisibilityCommand = new DelegateCommand(ExecuteCommand);
    private void ExecuteCommand()
    FirstVisibleProperty = !FirstVisibleProperty;
    SecondVisibleProperty = !SecondVisibleProperty;
    public bool FirstVisibleProperty
    get { return firstVisibleProperty; }
    set
    firstVisibleProperty = value;
    OnPropertyChanged(() => FirstVisibleProperty);
    public bool SecondVisibleProperty
    get { return secondVisibleProperty; }
    set
    secondVisibleProperty = value;
    OnPropertyChanged(() => SecondVisibleProperty);
    public DelegateCommand SwitchVisibilityCommand { get; set; }
    This setup is working fine on Windows, but in Windows Phone I get an unhandled exception (ArgumentException with the message ´Value does not fall within the expected range.´). 
    When I reduce the amount of hubsections to two, one that is visible and one that is collapsed, everything is working fine again. When I use multiple sections that all use the the same visibility property no exception is thrown
    When I set both properties to true in the viewmodel, also no exception is thrown.
    I've also tried the following (Without succes):
    - change my boolean properties to Visibility properties
    - use different boolean properties for each of the sections
    I do not understand why this exception is thrown and the exception itself is to vague to give any useful information
    How can I resolve this error??

    I've uploaded my code to OneDrive. Use the following link to download the source:
    https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=9c0070abc26b0b55&id=9C0070ABC26B0B55%2173811

  • Asa 5505 site to site VPN between A to B site, then B site MPLS to internal network

    Dear all
    I am setting up site to site VPN between two site A to B site.  Two local site of A and B are connected fine.  however for my site B have another internal MPLS to other site.  The connection fine from LAN A all the way to LAN B MPLS router, but it cannot be connect to other MPLS site.  If I did the MPLS traceroute from other site.  It can be reached of LAN B internal router.  Therefore, I am confusing which part of my configuration go wrong and any document for my reference.  Thank you very much.
    Local LAN A (5505 ASA)---------(5505 ASA) Local LAN B-----------B Internal router---------B MPLS router-------------other site.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Dear Harish
    for LAN B MPLS.  All 11.20.0.0/16 will route to LAN B internal router 10.14.128.252
    If traceroute from other 11.0.0.0 site to 11.20.128.250, it can reach until LAN B ASA 11.14.127.223
    11.20.128.250                        11.14.128.223                           11.14.128.252           11.14.128.253              11.0.0.0
    Local LAN A (5505 ASA)---------(5505 ASA) Local LAN B-----------B Internal router---------B MPLS router-------------other site.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    if traceroute from 10.20.0.0, it can reach until LAN B MPLS router 11.14.128.253
    For config file post.  Can I have your email address to direct send to you.  Thank you very much.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I Take All my music from one computer to another

    I need to take all my music from my home computer and put it on my laptop. I think I have copies all the correct files to an external hard drive and now need to put them on my laptop so that they are in my library in iTunes on my laptop. How do I do

  • Locating a Text File with spotlight??

    With recent Updates of OS X, Spotlight simply finds the File but no way to tell where it is.  Have tried everything I can think of; but, so far, the only way I have found is to Duplicate and then Move that to the Desktop fromwhich I can then place it

  • Alles für die katz

    lightroom stürzt ab -die ganze arbeit mit dem fotobuch für die katz. warum kann man die arbeit am fotobuch nicht auf einem konkreten speicherplatz jederzeit zwischensichern? habe mit viel mühe ein fotobuch entworfen - bei der arbeit stüzt lightroom a

  • Upgraded to IOS 7.0.3 on my Iphone 4S. How do I see mail in each account separately?

    Upgraded to IOS 7.0.3 on my IPhone 4S. Previously mail was separated into individual accounts,  but now all mail is lumped into "All Inboxes". How do I see mail in each account separately, so that I can reply from appropriate account?

  • Export turns out jerky/vibrating

    I'm making a simple movie, its approximatly 7 minutes long.  Its a screen capture tutorial.  I would like to set it up to play on most standard dvd players. My video consists of 1 AVI import, seperated by titles as commentary.  The AVI itself plays f