MRP and Reservation issue

Dear Gurus,
Our scenario for chemical industry is  MTS with strategy 10.
After MRP run for material 15 Planned orders are generated. After converting planned orders to Process orders are generated on same day 05/01/2012.
But actual production starts earlier on 25/12/2011 when process order date changed to 25/12/2011 and try to do batch determination error occurs as Material not available on 25/12/2011,though enough stock exists.
After TECO (all other 14 process orders) this allow process order to do Batch determination.
Why this error occurs ?
Please guide.
JHPert

Hi Pert,
The issue is in ATP logic. Please check of you have comsidered the reservation in ATP and also the pal orders and production orders as welll.

Similar Messages

  • Link between Pr raised after MRP and Reservation

    hi all,
    i am developing a new program in following way :
    if a note mention in BOM for a line item it can be seen in PR text after MRP run.
    for this i need linkage table between PR & reservation.
    please help me

    Hi,
    Not sure but you can try with  table RESB or FM MD_PEGGING
    Regards,
    Vishal

  • During MRP if system want consider open Pos and Reservation

    As above said if system want to consider open po's and reservation during MRP where configuration setting need to be done please tell me the SPRO path

    HI
    that setting is correct due to the availablity check system checks the PR,PO reseveration and different stocks. just tell you are not satisfied with the answer i understood ur question correctly
    I think what you asked that only i told you can check with other forum members
    regards
    ramakant

  • Movement type in MRP generated reservations

    Dear Experts ,
    I have a scenario where in a particular  material requirement is generated through MRP ( MRP Type PD)
    The system creates a reservation with movement type 261 for that particular  material.
    BUT
    My process of goods issue is as under :
    The goods are received in main store .
    The goods are transferred by the store keeper from main store to the production store .
    Finally the goods are consumed from the production store against an order.
    I WANT THE SYSTEM TO DEFAULT MOVEMENT TYPE 311 AND NOT 261 IN MRP GENERATED RESERVATIONS .
    How can i do it ?
    regards
    Anis

    Dear Anis,
    Are you meaning the reservation for a production order?
    In this case the system creates the reservation only once when the planned order is converted into a production order and
    saved.Once after the production order is released the system allows you to post the good's issue against the reservation no in
    MB1A.
    Defaultly the system will create for 261 movement.
    You can change this using the settings in OPKA(But think before making this change).
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • MRP and Availability check clarification

    while browsing the forum, many experts here mentioned in old threads that MRP and availability check are two different (independent) concepts. I am really confused on this one. let me put my understanding here and plz experts help me if I am wrong with a figurative explanation, so that will be easy for understanding.
    Assume this is the scenario as of today.
    Plant stock for material x u2013 100
    Reservations for material x u2013 70
    Incoming receipts for material x u2013 50
    So net stock = 100 + 50 -70 = 80
    sales order arrived for material x u2013 100 and availability check is done. Results of availability check says 80 can be confirmed and 20 can be confirmed on later date.Transfer of requirement for quantity 20 is done to MRP. Mrp runs and creates planned order for 20.
    In the availability check config  ovz9 if I say donu2019t consider reservations, then when availability check is done for 100 quantities..system will confirm 100 because available stock according to system will be 100+50 = 150. So transfer or requirements are not sent to mrp.
    So isnu2019t mrp run directly dependent on availability check?

    925,
    sales order arrived for material x u2013 100 and availability check is done. Results of availability check says 80 can be confirmed and 20 can be confirmed on later date. Transfer of requirement for quantity 20 is done to MRP
    No.  100 pcs requirements are passed to MRP.
    In the availability check config ovz9 if I say donu2019t consider reservations, then when availability check is done for 100 quantities..system will confirm 100 because available stock according to system will be 100+50 = 150. So transfer or requirements are not sent to MRP.
    No, 100 pieces requirement are passed to MRP.
    This behavior depends upon how your 'transfer of requirements' is configured, which is an SD setting.  Normally, unless the fix date qty field is set in the sales order, the entire 100 pc requirement is passed to MRP in all cases.  The assumption is that you have accepted the sales order and will 'some day' need to issue and sell the parts.  You need to begin planning for this event  now.
    When MRP subsequently runs, it will net out the supply elements (stock and inbound reservations) and will from this calculation determine how much needs to be built.  It then proposes a solution (planned order or purchase req).
    ATP check seldom has much impact on MRP.  You are correct in realizing that the ATP check must be consistent with MRP and with your chosen MRP strategies, in order to provide an end-to-end business process that is logical and meets all business requirements.  However, in SAP these two functions are separate.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Which table holds the link between Purchase requisition and Reservations ?

    Hi Guys,
    We are using MRP and as a result of the MRP run the reservations are converted to purchase requisition. When i look at transaction MD04 it shows me the Purchase requisition against a reservations.
    I would like to know which table holds this information? I mean which table will give me the reservations tied to a purchase requisition or vice a versa.
    I have looked into RESB and RSBD but could not find what i am looking at. RESB table has BANFN field for purchase requisition but this field is not populated. RSBD table hold the Purchase requisition and reservations but it only holds the relation for Direct procurement and not for all.
    Any idea where i can find the Preq and Reservations created through MRP run?
    Thanks
    VJ

    Try RKPF..
    thanks
    jz

  • MRP and purchase order delivery date

    Hello
    Question about MRP
    we would like that the MRP run takes into account purchase order with a delivery date in the future
    Say the MRP run 10th of Oct we want that all purchase orders open with a delivery date in the future takes into account the quantity that needs to be ordered TODAY
    EXAMPLE
    Minimum stock 5
    Wse stock 0
    Purchase order delivery date D+1 10
    Lead time is 5 days
    So if you run MRP the systems proposes 5 to order today but they do not want  to order 5 because there is a coming purchase order D+1 of 10
    Does anyone knows how the pruchase order of 10 is taken into account in the MRP run ?

    Unfortunately, one of the weakness of SAP MRP is if a purchase order and/or production order is late, MRP will tell you to order it again instead of expediting.
    We have overcome this and other issues with our own economical planning enhancements. If you are interested you can contact me with your contact information

  • Run MRP and Collective Purchase Requisition

    Hi all, I have a question for all. Very be kindly when receive your answer.
    When I run MRP, the system will be generate one Purchase Requisition for one item in BOM (10 items in BOM). So, I want to collect all requirement in BOM to only one Purchase Requisition. Does the system can support for this scenario???
    Thanks all

    >
    Hoai Vu wrote:
    > Thank all,
    > Your answer is helpfull for me, but not satisfy for my company. I have two maintenance order (MO):
    > MO 1 from DIEN department have:
    > Component A: 2
    > Component B: 3
    > MO 2 from CO department have:
    > Component C: 4
    > Component B: 5
    > When I run MRP, the system generate 3 PR
    > PR 1 for component A: 2 (from MO 1)
    > PR 2 for component B: 8 (from MO 1 and MO 2)
    > PR 3 for component C: 4 (from MO 2)
    >
    > So when the other department have a requiment for component B from CO department with quantity is 8, and the warehouse keeper will give 8 components B for CO department because they have a PR 2. So the stock of B is zero and we don't have material B for MO 1. I don't know why SAP does't have keep B and good issue only 4 for CO department. I wonder that why MRP generate one PR for component B instead of two PR.
    > And the second question is how to configure sytem. Becaus when I create a PO from PR, the system does not assign PR number into account assignment
    >
    > Thanks all
    >
    Hoai Vu wrote:
    > Dear all,
    > I would like to update my question and hope that everybody support me to solve this problem.
    > Thanks all
    Dear Hoai,
    What is the strategy maintained for header materials, i guess it is MTO ( make to order )
    If the strategy is MTO then go to MRP - 4 view for all components and make it as 1
    Then check the result
    Regards
    Madhu

  • Consumption Mode in MRP using reservations

    Hi Gurus,
    I am try to use the consumption mode found in the MRP setting if SAP.
    My scenario is as follows:
    1) Did a forecast of a material for 3 months
    2) Created a Reservation between does 3 months
    Problem:
    1) No compensation was made to any of the forecasted quantities (i.e if forcasted quatities was 100- and the reservation was 20-, the forecasted model remained 100- and a reservation of 20- came up when MRP was run)
    Expected Results:
    1) Forecasted quantity 80- and reservation 20-, i.e. total 100- not 120-
    Any ideas,
    Thanks,
    John.

    Dear Uday,
    Your question is related to delivery date proposed in the Sales Order processing. This has nothing to do with the consumption mode in the material master. Instead the delivery dates are proposed as per total replen lead time and inhouse prod time from MRP views.
    Regards,
    Ashish

  • MRP and Materials provided to Vendor

    Can you please help with the following:
    SAP 4.7, where a material component is issued to a vendor as part of the subcontracting process, MRP will re-order additional stock, if levels drop below the re-order point, the system does not take materials provided to vendor into consideration.  Is there a configuration setting that will take into consideration the quantity provided to the vendor as available stock when running MRP and therefore not generate an order until the material componenents are consumed and the goods receipt for the subcontract item carried out.
    Thank you

    Hi,
    Please look at this SAP note: 170597
    Regards,
    Mario

  • UCCE 8.5 Sometimes Agents state toggles between Ready and Reserved

    Hi,
    Sometimes Agents state toggles between Ready and Reserved.
    Our System is UCCE 8.5 and components versions are ICM 8.5.4, CVP 8.5, CM 7.1.
    If Help we use QueueTOSkillGroup node with requery.
    thanks

    Hi,
    If agent is getting Reserved and if the call did not arrive to the agent, there few things we need to check like
    * This mostly happens only for few agents with similar series of Extension (like 5XXX)
    * Phone which has this problem, you need to check the Partition/CSS setting from CUCM side
    * You can check Device Target is configured for that Extension (mostly people use Agent Targeting Rule with the range of    Extensions, make sure this exension is covered in that range)
    * You can check in you CVP, whether you have Routes configured for this series of extensions.
    But usually if this kind of instance happened for an agent for 2 call, the Agent should be moved into NOT READY state automatically by the system with the Reason code 50010.
    Are you sure they are going to Ready state ? Are they manually chaning the state to Ready state or it is automatic
    There are lot of posts in the forum with similar issues
    Regards,
    Senthil

  • Purchase requestions and Reservation for the Activity

    Dear All,
    While i am assigning SFG Material to Activitiy in the CJ20N Screen, system will pop up a screen and asking the :-
    1) Reservation for the Network
    2)Reservation for the WBS
    3) PR plus and Reservation for WBS, like this its is showing the pop up, 
    What is the main configuration settings required for this requirement.
    Regards
    Raj

    there is no direct configuration to control this data.
    If you do not specify a procurement indicator either in materail component maintainenace screen or in netowrk profile, the system will show you a list options like res for network or WBS etc., while assigning material to activity.
    These options are determined by item catelgory of the material, procurement type (MRP 2) in material master settings etc.,
    I would suggest you to read SAP HELP, detailed explanation is available.

  • Differentiation between PRs' Coming from MRP Run & Reservations

    Hi,
    How can we differntiate that a PR is coming from MRP Run (If quantity falles below ROP) and Reservation (If Max is 2 and reserved is 4)
    Appreciate your responses
    Regards,
    Talha

    Hi,
       I didnt get the second part of the question...could you please elaborate.
       The PR creation indicator will be in PR - item level - contact person tab as shown below.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Failed Hardware Scan and other issues E440

    Hi all,
    This is probably more rant than anything, but I wanted to give a heads up to others too.
    I have a ThinkPad E440 that is a year old. From the very first time I turned it on, there have been issues. The first hardware scan (via Lenovo Solution Center - LSC) showed a warning for the Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 Local Connection Test. There were also tons of System Events that always show up in the "Configuration History" part of the LSC. You can look at the calendar and tell exactly which days I used the computer because there will be System Events generated each day. Things like app crashes and failed drivers.
    In July 2014, I got the first warning for the 16 GB SSD - the SMART Short Self-Test. By February this year it showed as failed for each hardware scan (these were initially set up to run monthly).
    Also the whole time I've had it the touch screen would just stop working at some point and I would have to reboot to get it working again.
    I finally called Lenovo on March 30th, before my warranty expired. When I called that time, I didn't realize the hard drive failure was the SSD. So they sent me a new 500 GB drive. I also added the other things into the case when I talked to them. For the wireless issue they suggested making sure the driver was up to date. I did this and let them know when I called back that it was up to date and still having the warning. So I called them to tell them to tell them about the wireless and also that I realized it was the SSD having the failure, not the main drive. The first case had already been closed even though none of the other items were addressed.
    So they opened another case (this is #2). They said to mail them the laptop since the wireless issue would probably be on the board and it wasn't something I could fix myself. They sent a box with a prepaid overnight shipping label. I was very sick for a few days so I sent it back to them on April 10th (a Friday). Via UPS I saw it was delivered on Saturday. Work was performed on it Monday, April 13th and sent back to me that very day. I received it on April 14th. This part of the service has been excellent - very fast response.
    Being in IT, I included a letter with the laptop that outlined the issues that should have been in the case. I also printed the hardware scans and what the system events looked like.
    When I got the laptop back, the sheet inside said they had replaced the Speaker because of Distorted Sound. This was not even on the list even though I had noticed it. I didn't even power up the laptop before calling them again - yes, I was furious! Plus our power was out...
    So this was noon on the 14th. They opened case #3 and sent me ANOTHER BOX so I could send it back.
    After our power came back on the 15th, I powered up my laptop. I opened the browser (I have it set to restore the previous session) and there was a sexually explicit video on YouTube. I opened the other browser and there was a different video on YouTube. So this person was watching YouTube instead of fixing my laptop. I looked through both browser histories and there was quite a bit of activity while my laptop was at the repair center... I ran the hardware scan - still failed and a warning for the wireless. They really hadn't done anything.
    I also found two pictures of the repair person in the recycle bin...
    So I called back. I was LIVID! They opened another case (this is #4). And sent me ANOTHER BOX. I finally learned the other day that once a case is opened, it cannot be edited or added to at all. Instead, they close the other case and open a new one. I guess their turnaround time for closing cases is excellent! I've never seen a system like that - and I've used a lot of them.
    I got a really nice, patient fellow on the line. He took all my info (again). I emailed him the pictures, screen captures of the YouTube videos, the letter I had sent - everything. He entered as much into the new case as he could - he talked to one of the supervisors to make sure he did it right. Somehow he flagged it so that the laptop would get more attention (time) at the repair facility. He also opened a separate case (an escalation ticket?) for a supervisor to call me regarding the person's conduct at the repair facility. He said they would call me that day. (It's now the 25th and I've never heard from anyone)
    So, he sent me ANOTHER BOX. I've built up quite a stack of them.
    Our power was out AGAIN from the 17th through the 19th (don't get me started).
    I noticed a hardware scan had now gotten a failure on the main hard drive. So I called them on the 21st to add this to the case before sending the laptop back. The girl said they can't add anything to an existing case or edit it at all once it's opened. She would have to open a new case and SEND ME ANOTHER BOX. I told her to forget it because I was ready to send it in and didn't want to wait for another box. I also asked for a status on that "escalation case" where the supervisor was supposed to call me. In order to do this she, yes, wait for it, had to open ANOTHER CASE!! So they would know I wanted a status. I'm completely dumbfounded.
    So I sent it back on the 21st. This time I practically wiped it. I had already removed all my files the last time, but I had left my bookmarks and browser history intact.  I set up a guest logon with admin privileges. I updated my letter and printed off more stuff to include with the box. On one sheet I had only the case number, the serial number and machine type. On another sheet I had "DO NOT SEPARATE THIS PAPERWORK FROM THE LAPTOP" and the case number. I put this sheet on top (The guy on the 15th said my letter and stuff may have gotten separated from the laptop once it was delivered to the repair facility). I used a ton of staples so it would all stay together. I included in my letter the failure on the main hard drive and asked if they could look at it. I wrote about having to open a new case if I wanted to include it.
    They received it on the 22nd. A nice gentleman from the repair facility called me that day asking about the password. that. was. written. on the sheet they have you fill out. I told him what happened last time and also mentioned the hard drive failure and asked if he could look into it. He said they would.
    I received my laptop back yesterday morning.The sheet that came with it said they had "replaced the following parts to complete the repair of your laptop."
    Part Description                                           Symptom
    IMAGE                                                             Replaced due to engineering change
    System board                                                 Network card error
    Hard disk drive                                                Network card error
    ECA-WIRELESS                                            <no symptom listed>
    There was also a sheet saying they had installed a factory preload of software and I needed to install Lenovo and Windows updates.
    When I booted it up, the first thing I noticed, in the lower right corner was:
    Windows 8.1
    SecureBoot isn’t configured correctly
    Build 9600
    I ran a hardware scan. Well, I tried. It stopped part way through and said it finished successfully but most of the tasks showed up as cancelled. I tried to run it again - issues - rebooting ensued. It said the LSC wasn’t available and that I should try again or reboot.
    Tried several times. Then got what I guess is the new BSOD - kinder, gentler:
    Your PC ran into a problem and needs to restart. We're just
    collecting some error info, and then we'll restart for you. (xx% complete)
    If you'd like to know more, you can search online later for this error: DRIVER_CORRUPTED_EXPOOL
    Even though the LSC said my Lenovo files were all up to date, I ran the Update. And first I had to download a new version of Update. Then I downloaded all of the Lenovo updates and installed them (there were quite a few). The BIOS update failed. While I was doing the Lenovo downloads, I got a light blue screen but no text (I was out of the room so I'm not sure what happened). Did CTRL-ALT-DEL and it shows only IE and Task Manager as applications that are running. Could not “Switch to” IE. Hitting window key to go to start didn't do anything. So I had to restart.
    By 3pm yesterday there were 34 system events in the configuration history.
    I ran the hardware scan again after I updated the Lenovo files, and you guessed it! Failure on the SSD (SMART Short Self-Test) and warning on the wireless. Nothing had changed. Except hardware scan is acting different than it did before I sent in the laptop for repairs. When it finishes, it instantly closes and just shows 100% complete. When I click on "see last results" it shows a screen called
    Log Information,
    Canceled 04/24/2015 n:nn pm 
    You have not done a hardware test on your computer
    And the calendar in LSC only shows the very first hardware scan I did on Friday. Even the hardware scan screen shows the date and time of the last scan. It also shows the error code. In order to see exactly what is failing, I have to sit there and watch it very closely and snap a picture of the screen as soon as the error (or warning) shows up.
    When I would try to run Windows update, it would hang up PC Settings. I couldn't even kill it using task manager because it didn't show up as a task. During this, I got a flag saying the firewall wasn't turned on. I tried to turn it on, but clicking on Turn on Windows Firewall didn't do anything. I tried to setup my Microsoft account but that just hung too.
    I ended up running Windows Update FOUR TIMES to get all the updates installed. Every time I ran it, it said "Done!" and I would run it again and more would show up. The last time was this morning.
    At some point, the error about SecureBoot went away.
    Then, I created a bootable BIOS update disk. Following the ReadMe instructions, I went through ThinkPad Setup and verified several values. Of note:
    Secure Boot was DISABLED. According to the ReadMe file, this should be ENABLED in Windows 8.1. I enabled it.
    Under Startup/Boot, according to the ReadMe that came with the BIOS update, UEFI/Legacy Boot is supposed to be set at UEFI Only for Windows 8.1. Mine was set to "Both". I changed it.
    In Startup, OS Optimized Defaults was DISABLED, even though it says right there (and in the BIOS update ReadMe) it should be ENABLED to meet Microsoft Windows 8 Certification Requirement.
    After these updates, I flashed the new BIOS.
    Then, I ran hardware scan again...
    Now I have TWO failures on the SSD: Random Seek Test and SMART Short Self-Test. Great.
    In the Event Viewer (that I recently discovered), it says my disk has a bad block. It just says The device, \Device\Harddisk\DR1, has a bad block. I assume this is the SSD...
    There are 867 events in the event viewer - Critical, Error, and Warning...
    Fifty-two of these are from October 7, 2013 - before my little laptop was a glimmer.
    The rest are from when Lenovo had it and yesterday and today.
    64 of them are the disk error.
    341 are from DeviceSetupManager. 65 of those are from failed driver installs. 69 are for not being able to establish a connection to the windows update service. 64 are from not being able to establish a connection to the Windows Metadata and Internet Services (WMIS).
    3 times it's rebooted without cleanly shutting down
    60 of them are from Service Control Manager and say The TDKLIB service failed to start due to the following error: The system cannot find the file specified.
    One of them says {Registry Hive Recovered} Registry hive (file): '\??\C:\Users\Default\NTUSER.DAT' was corrupted and it has been recovered. Some data might have been lost.
    16 are warnings that various processors in Group 0 are being limited by system firmware.
    12 say the certificate for local system with thumbprint <bunch of hex numbers> is about to expire or already expired.
    108 are warnings for failure to load the driver \Driver\WUDFRd for various devices
    16 are application errors
    One is for the computer rebooting from a "bug check"
    15 are for name resolutions timing out after none of the configured DNS servers responded.
    10 are for SecureBoot being disabled.
    14 for services terminating unexpectedly
    15 are for WLAN Extensibility Module has stopped
    61 are for applications not being able to be restarted because the application SID does not match Conductor SID
    12 are for activation of CLSID timing out waiting for the service wuauserv to stop
    So, I'll call them on Monday and open. a. new. case (#5?) - but really 7. And get A NEW BOX.
    I'll keep you updated!

    Hi amycdero and welcome to the HP Forum,
    I understand that you are having scanning and printing issues after upgrading to Mavericks OS X v10.9.1. I will try my best to help you resolve this issue.
    In this document for Mac OS X: Scanning Software Does Not Open or Stops Responding are steps the may help you with your scanning issue.
    This document for Fixing Ink Streaks, Faded Prints, and Other Common Print Quality Problems should help with the streaking printing issue.
    I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know.
    Thank you,
    I worked on behalf of HP.

  • Zune and reserved space problem

    Hi all, I just started using lumia 710 and finding it a great, fun and highly efficient device. One minor problem I am getting is with zune and reserved storage space.
    If I install a game/app in phone, the reserved space bar increases as expected. But the problem is that, even if I uninstall the game/app, the reserved space bar does not decrase, it stays the same as when the game/app was installed. so if i try out a few apps/ game and remove them later, i lose the equal amount of space from zune media storage. For example I tried out couple of xbox live titles and removed them later, net result --> my reserved space increased ~500mb while i lost 500mb from zune media free space.
    if anyone can help me to sort this out, I will be very much grateful.
    P.S. from phone i see i have ~ 3gb free space out of 6.28 gb. thanks

    Additionaly, I have all my music files in User/Music & in Downloads. I also see my iTunes "Media Folder" is located in User/Music/iTunes and is 20GB...the size itunes says.

Maybe you are looking for

  • XML Parsing Woes

    I'm trying to parse XML being returned from a service but having no luck. I've written a unit test to parse a sample that looks like this: *<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>* *<ShoppingLists xmlns="http://service.mydomain.com/2011/01" xmlns:i="h

  • Trouble with mic shocking me!

    Probably a stupid question, but every time I get close to my Shure SM58 mic I get shocked. I'm running through a 16 channel mixer, then into the line-in on the computer. There is not a ground switch to flip, like on an amp, so I don't know how to get

  • Ignore Tolerance limits for Subsequent docs.

    Dear All, Is there any possibility exists to avoid PP tolerance key check ignore for only in case of SUBSEQUENT DEBIT/CREDIT. The tolerance limits sets in PP working fine for INVOICE, but this check i dont want to be considered in case of SUBSEQUENT

  • Report of Inactive users

    Hi How to extract the users list  who are inactive in  the month of Nov,Jan and Feb. Have to filter the users month wise of the past month.how is it possible.. Thanks  in Advance!

  • How to configure WSDP for use in IDE like Netbeans

    Hello, I have two questions about WSDP integration in IDE like Netbeans: 1) I have a problem compiling the WSDP tutorial examples inside Netbeans. I believe the problem is that Netbeans doesn't know about the ${jwsdp.home} attribute in the build file