MS ACCESS EXCEPTION TOO MANY CLIENT TASKS

hi all
i am developing an application in jsp for calll center users.
there are 4 types of users who can interact with the appl
in that 100 users of one type are interacting with it.
i am using MS ACCESS for the database connection.
it is working well when 10 users simultaneously logs in
but when users increases its capacity degrades and it throws an exception TOO MANY CLIENT TASKS
i have surfed through net and diffrent forums in that the soln is to switch to Mysql or SQL SERVER
i had talked to the PM
he needs in MS ACCESS itself
i am using tomcat version 5 jdk 1.5

LOVECODING wrote:
hi all
i am developing an application in jsp for calll center users.
there are 4 types of users who can interact with the appl
in that 100 users of one type are interacting with it.
i am using MS ACCESS for the database connection.
it is working well when 10 users simultaneously logs in
but when users increases its capacity degrades and it throws an exception TOO MANY CLIENT TASKS
i have surfed through net and diffrent forums in that the soln is to switch to Mysql or SQL SERVER
i had talked to the PM
he needs in MS ACCESS itselfSounds like your PM is screwed.
i am using tomcat version 5 jdk 1.5Irrelevant.
%

Similar Messages

Can't Solve the "Too Many Clients Tasks" Problem

Hello All ,
I am creating a java desktop application , and i keep getting this error message:
[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Too many client tasks.
Any way ,i googled for this error and i found that because i creates many connections with database "more than 10 i think " , and that why i get this error message ..
The problem is that i do not know how to solve it , i tried to close the connections and i still getting the same error
I searched this forum , and someone suggest to close the connections and the statements and the resultset , but still not working
this is the code
public class Database_Mangement {
    private String User_ID;
    private String user_name;
    private String password;
    private Admin_Connection c;
    private Connection conn;
    private Connection uni_conn;
    private ArrayList<Admin_TableEntry> data;
    public Database_Mangement() throws SQLException
      conn = null;
      uni_conn = null;
      conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:odbc:smart_database");// Connect with database no 1 through ODBC
      uni_conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:odbc:uni_database");//Connect with database no 2 through ODBC
      data = new ArrayList<Admin_TableEntry>();
     ArrayList<Admin_TableEntry> getInformation(int type)throws SQLException
         Statement stm = null;
         ResultSet getInfo = null;
       try{
         //get User Information
            if(type==1)
                 stm = conn.createStatement();
                String temp;
                temp = "select * from Students";
                getInfo = stm.executeQuery(temp);
            else if(type==2)
                 stm = uni_conn.createStatement();
                String temp;
                temp = "select * from Students";
                getInfo = stm.executeQuery(temp);
             while(getInfo.next())
                  Admin_TableEntry tempclass = new Admin_TableEntry();
                  if(type==1)
                  {tempclass.ID = getInfo.getString("Student_ID");
                   tempclass.Name =getInfo.getString("Student_Name");
                   tempclass.balance=getInfo.getString("Student_Balance");}
                  else if(type==2)
                      tempclass.ID =getInfo.getString("Student_ID");
                      tempclass.Name = getInfo.getString("First_Name");
                      tempclass.Last_Name =getInfo.getString("Last_Name");
                      tempclass.haveaccount=getInfo.getBoolean("Have_SmartCard");
                   data.add(tempclass);
catch(Exception e)
{System.out.println(e.getMessage();}
finally
     conn.close();
     uni_conn.close();
    stm.close();
//    getInfo.close(); Please note that i get an error message when i try to close the ResultSet
//and this is the error message
// Exception in thread "main" java.sql.SQLException: ResultSet is closed
               return data;
}and thank you for your time..

Thanks , but it only solved the ResultSet.close() problem ,
i am still getting the Too Many Clients error
and i am closing every connection i created after the end of every function .
i think i will switch to SQl server 2008 ... Hope it will be better

SQLException :Too many client tasks problem

Hi,
In my Standalone Java Swing application, iam using connections to the MS-Access Database using Connection pooling..Iam initializing around 10 connections. After executing, performing some operations on application, after sometime...i get the SQL Exception Too many client tasks exception..
I have checked my programs..iam closing all my result set and prepared statements..
Where am i going wrong?
Can anybody pls advice me to solve this problem?
Regards,
SRhodes.

remember access has a max number of connection to handle which you are not closing. you close only resultset and statements
ivo

Distributed Access Exception for Forte Client

We are experiencing a problem with Forte Runtime client machines getting a
distributed access exception when trying to start a client application. We
have about 40 installed clients of a new production application. All the
clients machines started out okay, but about 1 or 2 machines a day start
having this distributed access problem. The only workaround we have found
is to delete the clients environment repository files and start up the
client application again. This causes a re-install of the client partition,
which also gets the distributed access exception but the client does
start-up anyway. Once the client machine starts to have this problem we
have to do the work around every time the client needs to start-up. At the
rate we are going all of our clients will need this workaround.
Anyone know what's going on here?

LOVECODING wrote:
hi all
i am developing an application in jsp for calll center users.
there are 4 types of users who can interact with the appl
in that 100 users of one type are interacting with it.
i am using MS ACCESS for the database connection.
it is working well when 10 users simultaneously logs in
but when users increases its capacity degrades and it throws an exception TOO MANY CLIENT TASKS
i have surfed through net and diffrent forums in that the soln is to switch to Mysql or SQL SERVER
i had talked to the PM
he needs in MS ACCESS itselfSounds like your PM is screwed.
i am using tomcat version 5 jdk 1.5Irrelevant.
%

Livecache issue LC10 BY0 Too many users (task limit)

Hi,
we have 2 application servers with one CI/DB, maxusertasks is 500
we figured out a livecache pb, with the following error messages
(db analyzer)
LC10 BY0 > Too many users (task limit)
User task 281 blocked in stae 'Prep-End(230)' since 902s, DB procedure : SAPAPO_CLEANUP application pid
User task 281 blocked in stae 'Prep-End(230)' since 902s, DB procedure : SIM_SIMSESSION_CONTROL, pid 31685
...User task 281 blocked in stae 'Prep-End(230)' since 902s, DB procedure : APS_ACT_SCHEDULE, pid 3168
before we had the warining: UTK5 is running 1804s, CPU 50% and CPU 100% (LC)
we have checked knldiag/knldiagerr files and we are unable to find what is the root cause of the problem?
How could we analyse this issue and find the treatment which triggers this issue?
(trace: (SAPAPO/OM01)
Thanks and Best regards,
any help would be rewarded.
Best regards,
John
Edited by: DCWE COREADMIN on Feb 11, 2011 6:54 PM

Hello John,
We need additional information about the liveCache version, OS of the liveCache server; more details about situation when the issue occurred. Run "x_cons <SID> sh all 10 10 > task_info.txt" when the issue occurred to collect more information.
Check if the savepoint task is active - "x_cons <SID> show active".
Is the issue occurred during high loading to te liveCache?
Please review the SAP note 1391322 where the SPORADIC standstill in high load situation is also described, this issue is already fixed in the new liveCache releases.
This situation occured sporadically. It will be helpful to login to your system for further analysis of the reported issue to get clear if your system run into this known problem because the savepoint was hanging, because of that you had big amount of the user tasks which were hours in the state 'Prep-End' until the liveCache restart.
< It could be the reason for "livecache issue LC10 BY0 > Too many users (task limit)", you reached the MAXUSERTASKS limit,
the increasing of the liveCache parameter will not help you to solve the issue. >
You checked/saw the Database Analyzer log :
"User task 281 blocked in stae 'Prep-End(230)' since 902s, DB procedure : SAPAPO_CLEANUP application pid
User task 281 blocked in stae 'Prep-End(230)' since 902s, DB procedure : SIM_SIMSESSION_CONTROL, pid 31685
...User task 281 blocked in stae 'Prep-End(230)' since 902s, DB procedure : APS_ACT_SCHEDULE, pid 3168
You are SAP customer. As already recommended by Ivan, create the SAP message to the component "BC-DB-LVC" and get SAP support.
Thank you and best regards, Natalia Khlopina

Exception too many rows...

Hi
I am getting two different outputs with following code depending upon i declare the variable in first or second way...
when i declare the variable v_empno as number(10) and too many rows exception is raised....and after that i dbms this variable..it is null...
but when i declare the same variable as table.column%type....and the similar scenario happens and i dbms the value of variable...it is not null...rather the first value from output of the query...
declare
--v_empno number(10);
v_empno emp.empno%type;
begin
dbms_output.put_line('before '||v_empno );
select empno into v_empno from emp;
dbms_output.put_line('first '||v_empno);
exception when too_many_rows then
dbms_output.put_line('second '||v_empno);
dbms_output.put_line('exception'||sqlerrm);
end;
is there any specific reason for this....
ur comments plz
Thanks
Sidhu

In 9i:
SQL> declare
2 --v_empno number(10);
3 v_empno emp.empno%type;
4 begin
5 dbms_output.put_line('before '||v_empno );
6 select empno into v_empno from emp;
7 dbms_output.put_line('first '||v_empno);
8 exception when too_many_rows then
9 dbms_output.put_line('second '||v_empno);
10 dbms_output.put_line('exception'||sqlerrm);
11 end;
12 /
before
second 7369
exceptionORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> declare
2 v_empno number;
3 --v_empno emp.empno%type;
4 begin
5 dbms_output.put_line('before '||v_empno );
6 select empno into v_empno from emp;
7 dbms_output.put_line('first '||v_empno);
8 exception when too_many_rows then
9 dbms_output.put_line('second '||v_empno);
10 dbms_output.put_line('exception'||sqlerrm);
11 end;
12 /
before
second
exceptionORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> edit
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_empno number(10);
3 --v_empno emp.empno%type;
4 begin
5 dbms_output.put_line('before '||v_empno );
6 select empno into v_empno from emp;
7 dbms_output.put_line('first '||v_empno);
8 exception when too_many_rows then
9 dbms_output.put_line('second '||v_empno);
10 dbms_output.put_line('exception'||sqlerrm);
11* end;
SQL> /
before
second 7369
exceptionORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.In 10G:
SQL> declare
2 v_empno number(10);
3 --v_empno emp.empno%type;
4 begin
5 dbms_output.put_line('before '||v_empno );
6 select empno into v_empno from emp;
7 dbms_output.put_line('first '||v_empno);
8 exception when too_many_rows then
9 dbms_output.put_line('second '||v_empno);
10 dbms_output.put_line('exception'||sqlerrm);
11 end;
12 /
before
second 7369
exceptionORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> edit
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_empno number;
3 --v_empno emp.empno%type;
4 begin
5 dbms_output.put_line('before '||v_empno );
6 select empno into v_empno from emp;
7 dbms_output.put_line('first '||v_empno);
8 exception when too_many_rows then
9 dbms_output.put_line('second '||v_empno);
10 dbms_output.put_line('exception'||sqlerrm);
11* end;
SQL> /
before
second 7369
exceptionORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> edit
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 --v_empno number;
3 v_empno emp.empno%type;
4 begin
5 dbms_output.put_line('before '||v_empno );
6 select empno into v_empno from emp;
7 dbms_output.put_line('first '||v_empno);
8 exception when too_many_rows then
9 dbms_output.put_line('second '||v_empno);
10 dbms_output.put_line('exception'||sqlerrm);
11* end;
SQL> /
before
second 7369
exceptionORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.Anyhow you should not rely on the fact Oracle fetches the first value into variable
and keeps it when the excaprion is raised.
Tom Kyte discusses the SELECT INTO issue here:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:7849913143702726938::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:1205168148688
Rgds.

Java exception "Too many rows" when launching

Hi,
I'm trying to run SQLDeveloper on AIX 5.2
The Java software is the JAVA 1.5 :
$ ./java -version
java version "1.5.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build pap64devifx-20070725 (SR5a))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.3, J2RE 1.5.0 IBM J9 2.3 AIX ppc64-64 j9vmap6423-20070426 (JIT enabled)
J9VM - 20070420_12448_BHdSMr
JIT - 20070419_1806_r8
GC - 200704_19)
JCL - 20070725
When launching sqldeveloper, I get more than 3000 error lines...
Here are the beginning :
java.io.FileNotFoundException: <INSTALLATION-PATH>/jdev/extensions/oracle.jdeveloper.db.sqlplus.jar (Too many open files)
at java.io.RandomAccessFile.<init>(RandomAccessFile.java:243)
at oracle.ide.boot.JarDirs.getDirsImpl(JarDirs.java:75)
at oracle.ide.boot.JarDirs.<init>(JarDirs.java:63)
at oracle.ide.boot.SharedJarByPackage.<init>(SharedJarByPackage.java:19)
at oracle.ide.boot.IdeSharedCodeSourceFactory.createCodeSource(IdeSharedCodeSourceFactory.java:30)
at oracle.classloader.SharedCodeSourceFactory.create(SharedCodeSourceFactory.java:43)
at oracle.classloader.SharedCodeSourceSet.subscribe(SharedCodeSourceSet.java:315)
at oracle.classloader.SharedCodeSourceSet.subscribe(SharedCodeSourceSet.java:174)
at oracle.classloader.SharedCodeSourceSet.subscribe(SharedCodeSourceSet.java:148)
at oracle.classloader.SharedCodeSourceSet.subscribe(SharedCodeSourceSet.java:215)
at oracle.classloader.PolicyClassLoader.addCodeSource(PolicyClassLoader.java:874)
at oracle.ideimpl.extension.ExtensionManagerImpl.addToPolicyClassLoader(ExtensionManagerImpl.java:1464)
at oracle.ideimpl.extension.ExtensionManagerImpl.addURLToClassPath(ExtensionManagerImpl.java:1401)
at oracle.ideimpl.extension.ExtensionManagerImpl.mav$addURLToClassPath(ExtensionManagerImpl.java:116)
at oracle.ideimpl.extension.ExtensionManagerImpl$4.addToClasspath(ExtensionManagerImpl.java:690)
at javax.ide.extension.spi.BaseExtensionVisitor.addExtensionSourceToClasspath(BaseExtensionVisitor.java:278)
If it could help you, the splash screen is display a short time and the progression bar is beginning but for a short time only, after what the process is dying.
Thanks,
Christian

java.io.FileNotFoundException: <INSTALLATION-PATH>/jdev/extensions/oracle.jdeveloper.db.sqlplus.jar (Too many open files)
You have exceeded your max open files limit as determined by your operating system. You need to talk to your system administrators.

Error while adding PNI for too many clients

Hi,
I have added bunch of hosts to the OSB server and while trying to add PNI for all these hosts I am getting the following error. I have a total of 42 clients. If I add 20 to 25, I am okay, otherwise I am getting the error below.
Can someone tell me how to fix this.
Error: unable to set preferred network interface for rstnosb01 - RPC buffer too small for message
Thanks,
Hari

Hi,
I had a similar problem in a previous version when adding attach points - it would work with up to about five, but not above. This has now been fixed, but the way I got around it was by shutting down all the OSB services on the Admin server, and then editing the appropriate OSB configuration file and added the extra information. I dont use PNI's so don't know which configuration file to edit, but you will probably find something on the Admin server in /usr/local/oracle/backup/admin/config/host/<OSB host name>. Have a look at one of the host configuration files which has worked and see what the format is.
Not for the faint-hearted I admit, but the beauty of OSB is that this type of workaround does seem to work (or at least it did in my case). Also, if you do give this a go, dont forget to save the original file first, and also dont forget to re-start the OSB services once you are done.

MS ACCESS exception when updating memo field

I use JDBC - stmt.setCharachterStream() to set large amount of characters to the db.
I get a MS Access "Function sewuence error" when updating a large amount of data (for smaller amounts there is no problem).
Any Ideas ?
note:
I was using stmt.setAsciiStream method but had problem saving data with non english characters in DB (that was in SQL server DB)..
The data was saved as "?". but with setCharactersStream it is saved ok.
So I must use setCharacterStream method..

LOVECODING wrote:
hi all
i am developing an application in jsp for calll center users.
there are 4 types of users who can interact with the appl
in that 100 users of one type are interacting with it.
i am using MS ACCESS for the database connection.
it is working well when 10 users simultaneously logs in
but when users increases its capacity degrades and it throws an exception TOO MANY CLIENT TASKS
i have surfed through net and diffrent forums in that the soln is to switch to Mysql or SQL SERVER
i had talked to the PM
he needs in MS ACCESS itselfSounds like your PM is screwed.
i am using tomcat version 5 jdk 1.5Irrelevant.
%

Ipad states too many redirects and will not access web page

I am trying to access a webpage used previously on my IPAD; recently updated software IOS7 this week and now says" can not access page too many redirects", what do I need to do for correction?

Safari 6
Empty Caches
Safari > Preference > Advanced
Checkmark the box for "Show Develop menu in menu bar".
Develop menu will appear in the Safari menu bar.
Click Develop and select "Empty Caches" from the dropdown.
Remove website data.
Safari > Preferences > Privacy > "Remove All Website Data".
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3320

Too many exception"ACCESS.ERROR: Authorization check"

We found there are too many Exception "ACCESS.ERROR: Authorization check for caller assignment to J2EE security role" occur in our Portal System with a 10 seconds interval after checking the defalutTrace file. Can anyone help us to resolve the problem?
thanks in advance.
Date : 10/29/2007
Time : 15:29:58:057
Message : ACCESS.ERROR: Authorization check for caller assignment to J2EE security role [service.jms.default.authorization : administrators] referencing J2EE security role [SAP-J2EE-Engine : administrators].
Severity : Error
Category : /System/Security/Audit/J2EE
Location : com.sap.engine.services.security.roles.SecurityRoleReference
Application : sap.com/irj
Thread : Thread[Thread-54,5,SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_Group]
Datasource : 1193643286133:/usr/sap/EP0/DVEBMGS00/j2ee/cluster/server0/log/defaultTrace.trc
Message ID : 001125C013B40061000030D50071607A00043D9CAAE34B57
Source Name : com.sap.engine.services.security.roles.SecurityRoleReference
Argument Objs : ACCESS.ERROR,service.jms.default.authorization,administrators,SAP-J2EE-Engine,administrators,
Arguments : ACCESS.ERROR,service.jms.default.authorization,administrators,SAP-J2EE-Engine,administrators,
Dsr Component :
Dsr Transaction : 0c229a6085c811dc8856001125c013b4
Dsr User :
Indent : 0
Level : 0
Message Code :
Message Type : 1
Relatives : /System/Security/Audit/J2EE
Resource Bundlename :
Session : 3572
Source : com.sap.engine.services.security.roles.SecurityRoleReference
ThreadObject : Thread[Thread-54,5,SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_Group]
Transaction :
User : J2EE_GUEST
Date : 10/29/2007
Time : 15:29:38:017
Message : ACCESS.ERROR: Authorization check for caller assignment to J2EE security role [SAP-J2EE-Engine : administrators].
Severity : Error
Category : /System/Security/Audit/J2EE
Location : com.sap.engine.services.security.roles.SecurityRoleImpl
Application : sap.com/irj
Thread : Thread[Thread-54,5,SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_Group]
Datasource : 1193643286133:/usr/sap/EP0/DVEBMGS00/j2ee/cluster/server0/log/defaultTrace.trc
Message ID : 001125C013B40061000030C70071607A00043D9CA9B17F21
Source Name : com.sap.engine.services.security.roles.SecurityRoleImpl
Argument Objs : ACCESS.ERROR,SAP-J2EE-Engine,administrators,
Arguments : ACCESS.ERROR,SAP-J2EE-Engine,administrators,
Dsr Component :
Dsr Transaction : 0c229a6085c811dc8856001125c013b4
Dsr User :
Indent : 0
Level : 0
Message Code :
Message Type : 1
Relatives : /System/Security/Audit/J2EE
Resource Bundlename :
Session : 3570
Source : com.sap.engine.services.security.roles.SecurityRoleImpl
ThreadObject : Thread[Thread-54,5,SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_Group]
Transaction :
User : J2EE_GUEST

Hi Jan,
I have implemented these patches usage Type EP.
CAF 13.1
SAP-JEE 13.1
SAP-JEECOR 13.3
SAP_JTECHF 13.1
SAP_JTECJS 13.1
UMEADMIN 13.2
Take a look at:
Support Packages and Patches -> SAP NetWeaver -> SAP NETWEAVER -> SAP NETWEAVER 7.0 (2004S) -> Entry by Component -> Development Infrastructure
Uwe

"Too many open files" Exception on "tapestry-framework-4.1.1.jar"

When a browser attempts accessing to my webwork, the server opens a certain number of file descriptors to "tapestry-framework-4.1.1.jar" file and don't release them for a while.
Below is the output from "lsof | grep tapestry":
java 26735 root mem REG 253,0 62415 2425040 /usr/local/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/my_webwork/WEB-INF/lib/tapestry-portlet-4.1.1.jar
java 26735 root mem REG 253,0 2280602 2425039 /usr/local/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/my_webwork/WEB-INF/lib/tapestry-framework-4.1.1.jar
java 26735 root mem REG 253,0 320546 2425036 /usr/local/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/my_webwork/WEB-INF/lib/tapestry-contrib-4.1.1.jar
java 26735 root mem REG 253,0 49564 2424979 /usr/local/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/my_webwork/WEB-INF/lib/tapestry-annotations-4.1.1.jar
java 26735 root 28r REG 253,0 2280602 2425039 /usr/local/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/my_webwork/WEB-INF/lib/tapestry-framework-4.1.1.jar
java 26735 root 29r REG 253,0 2280602 2425039 /usr/local/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/my_webwork/WEB-INF/lib/tapestry-framework-4.1.1.jar
java 26735 root 30r REG 253,0 2280602 2425039 /usr/local/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/my_webwork/WEB-INF/lib/tapestry-framework-4.1.1.jar
These unknown references are sometimes released automatically, but sometimes not.
And I get "Too many open files" exception after using my application for a few hours.
The number of the unknown references increases as I access to my webwork or just hit on "F5" key on my browser to reload it.
I tried different types of browsers to see if I could see any differences in consequence, and in fact it differed by the browser I used.
When viewed by Internet Explorer it increased by 3 for every access.
On the other hand it increased by 7 for each attempt when accessed by FireFox.
I have already tried optimizing the max number of file discriptors, and it solved the "Too many open files" exception.
But stil I'm wondering who actually is opening "tapestry-framework-4.1.1.jar" this many.
Could anyone figure out what is going on?
Thanks in advance.
The following is my environmental version info:
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
- Java: 1.5.0_11
- Tomcat: 5.5.20
- Tapestry: 4.1.1

Hi,
Cause might The server got an exception while trying to accept client connections. It will try to backoff to aid recovery.
The OS limit for the number of open file descriptor (FD limit) needs to be increased. Tune OS parameters that might help the server to accept more client connections (e.g. TCP accept back log).
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs90/messages/Server.html#BEA-002616
Regards,
Prasanna Yalam

Too Many disk I/O tasks (-10022) error playing song after edits

I have been fighting Logic 9 throwing the "Too Many disk I/O tasks (Elastic Audio) (-10022)" error when playing back a song with 12 tracks of audio AFTER I cut across 8 tracks (of drums) and move regions around. The Disk I/O indicator never shows more than 1-2 bars, tops when this error is thrown. While writing this up and troubleshooting, the problem has seemed to sort itself out, but only after doing some peculiar steps.
*System is MacPro 2x2.26 Quad-Core, 8GB RAM, Mackie Onyx 1620 recording to 500GB WD MyBook Pro over FW800. I/O Buffer = 128.
1) Grouped the 8 tracks of drums (there are 3 takes on each track). Play back song. No problems.
2) Cut the drums at bars 73, 81, 105 and 109.
3) Drag-copied the regions from bars 105-109 to 73-81.
4) Playback song, error thrown at bar 70
5) Increase buffer size to 256.
6) Playback song, error thrown at bar 70
7) Increase buffer size to 512.
8) Playback song, error thrown at bar 70
- Thought this might be a disk problem.
9) I copied the project with all the files to the internal Seagate and open the project.
10) Playback song, error thrown at bar 70
- Thinking this is not a disk problem.
11) Open the project on the original WD external drive.
12) Mute all regions an all drum tracks except the kick.
13) The song plays back normally.
14) Un-mute regions on 1 track and playback and repeat for each track.
15) The song plays back normally until the 8th drum track is un-muted, then the error is thrown.
16) Mute and un-mute the regions on 8th drum track.
17) The song now plays back normally. Error no longer thrown.
Looks like after making the edits, muting all the regions and un-muting them 1 by one might have cleared this up right away.
Is anyone else is experiencing something similar? If so, how are you working around this?

No, didn't solve it yet, after I'm done completing work to meet a deadline, I will do some experimenting and see what I can figure out. But so far I've had this phasing issue occur in two different sessions on two different rigs (both Mac Pro dual-quad core with lotsa RAM)...
One test that anyone could try... to really max it out... take one single source and record it onto 20 tracks at once... or I guess you could just record one track and then duplicate it 19 times, whatever. Group all these tracks, keep `em all at the same level. Then take a listen to all tracks at once using some good headphones.
Then put all the tracks in flex mode and do some flexing, flex every single quarter note this way and that way for three full measures or so, whatever. Then play it back again with headphones. If you hear ANY hint of phase shifting, then you are experiencing what I am experiencing.
For anyone who might not be familiar with the "phase shifting" sound I speak of, it pretty much will sound as if you are running your tracks through a classic "phase shifter" effect pedal or whatever. If using headphones, it'll seem like the audio starts swirling around in your head like some wacky stereo effect, frequency response will change and shift, etc.
I've noted that I have not always heard phase issues when flexing, it seem to be a bit inconsistent. It may be because I've been working in some very large sessions, maybe in my situations Logic was already being heavily taxed and then the extra flexing just put it over the edge. Don't know. Will do some testing perhaps next week.
But, I'd say everyone should be careful about this before bouncing forever to disk and then maybe deleting all your old raw audio, because if you permanently write in some wacky phase shifting between your group of drum tracks and have no original raw files left, you'll be in very big trouble... I don't think there would be any way to fix that. In a professional level mix, that type of issue would stick out like a sore thumb. I guess one fix would be to apply a phase shifter effect across the entire drum bus... on purpose... as some sort of artistic statement... hey, it might sound cool!
This whole issue has made me realize how incredibly important it is for DAW tracks to remain truly phase locked at all times. Been working with DAWs for years now and never really thought about it. In one regard, this is a lot to ask... to make sure your 30-odd tracks or whatever are always dead in time with each other, to the sample. It's certainly of critical importance, at least for multiple tracks of the same exact source (like when you have 12 mics on a drum kit etc).
Actually, perfect time synch is just as critical for even a mere TWO mics on a given source... any stereo recording. Once one track goes out of "synch" with the other, even by a minute amount, just for a short amount of time, you will HEAR it.,.. and it won't be good... unless you desire a wacky phase shifting effect.

Too many Subscribers/Receivers after client re-connects

I'm using JMS3.6 with the following settings:
obj.lookupName=QueueConnectionFactory
obj.attrs.imqBrokerHostName=localhost
obj.attrs.imqBrokerHostPort=7676
obj.attrs.imqAddressList=mq://localhost:7676/jms
obj.attrs.imqPingInterval=10
obj.attrs.imqReconnectAttempts=2
obj.attrs.imqReconnectEnabled=true
obj.attrs.imqReconnectInterval=10000
Everything works fine when I disconnect the server's network cable and re-conect it, but if I disconnect the client's network cable, when it tries to recconect I get the following exception:
C4073:: [C4073]: A JMS destination limit was reached. Too many Subscribers/Receivers for Queue : ABTYGUN1DEST user=guest, broker=10.1.1.212:7676(2847)
I still get that exception after I restart my client application. I have to restart the JMS server to restore the queue.
Any Ideas?

Hi,
Depending on the version of JMS, this may be a limitation of iMQ PE Edition (This is early in the morning for me, I can't remember which one). So you can look at the documentation, this may be a limitation of PE versus SE or EE. If you can modify it it would be using either the command line imqcmd or the gui based, imqadmin. With it, you can get into the connection factory, and change the maximum number of active consumers onto the queue.
I beleive that using glassfish (as 9) would alleviate this limitation, if it is there, since this is using openmq (imq v4.0).
HTH
TE

Access 2010 table has too many fields for web database - how to split into two web-compatible tables?

Hello,
I'm in the process of converting an Access 2010 database into a web database and I'm having some trouble. I have a table which has 236 fields, which is more than the 220 field limit for web-compatible tables. I have tried to split this table into two tables
with a one-to-one relationship, but web tables can only use lookups as relationships. I've tried to connect the tables with a lookup and then synthesize a one-to-one relationship by using data macros but I'm not having much luck.
I realize that 236 fields is a lot, but it must be set up this way because each field represents a tasks and is a yes/no box to verify that the task has been completed - and the records are different employees for whom which the tasks need to be completed.
Could someone please help me figure out a way to make this table web compatible?
Thank you,
Ryan

Hi,
I found that you've cross post the quesion on our Answer forum, are you satisfiled the reply from there?
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2010-access/access-2010-table-has-too-many-fields-for-web/06ee81ea-24ab-48b8-9b8f-0ed08a868bac
Regards,
George Zhao
TechNet Community Support

MS ACCESS EXCEPTION TOO MANY CLIENT TASKS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for