Multi-Core support

Dear users,
When i'm exporting my Flash project (under Adobe Flash
Professional 8)
Flash only use 25% of my quadcore CPU. So it only used one
core.
Before i had a Dual-core CPU and Flash used only 50% of my
CPU (so also just 1 core).
I'm using a AMD platform.
Motherboard: Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe
CPU: AMD Phenom X4 9850
Is there any way to enable multi-core support under Flash?
Thanks in advance,
Remi

i don't change any change in compile time from our single to
our quad core machines. having said that it's not as if the single
core maxs out, so..

Similar Messages

Multi Core Support for AMD 1100T

I've read through the lists, and I suppose my answer is going to be "it depends", but as you can see from the attached two pics, it looks like Audition is only using 1 of my 6 physical cores. Every time I look, there's really only one core doing much of anything (and it is the same core) - whether it is handling plugins, exporting/rendering, etc... Is my answer "it depends on what you're doing"?

I can't see the core utilisation from these graphs; all the processor information is rolled into the top one. All I can tell from this is that you are using 19% of 6 cores, which sounds about right for what you are doing.
By and large, no software will use all of the cores - you tend to need at least one dedicated to keeping the computer itself running!

64-bit and Support for Multi-Core Computers

I recently bought one of the new 12-core Mac Pro's from Apple, but was disappointed to see the lack of 64-bit support and optimization for multi-core computers within InDesign. When producing magazines with hundreds of pages and hundreds of fonts, the need for multi-core support and 64-bit processing are vital.
Can anyone at Adobe confirm that they will implement this in CS6? It's long overdue.

InDesign is a really complicated program. 64 bit support is of marginal use of InDesign. It would be faster (as is the case using ID Server 64 bit on Windows), but I'm not sure how much of a difference that would make for the average desktop user.
Adobe has done a lot of multi-threading work under the hood for CS5 (and pdf export is one of the first fruits of that). What further support they might add for CS+, is anyones guess, but it'll be easier now that a lot of the preliminary work is done. Each feature would be a separate effort, so if there's something SPECIFIC you'd like to see multi-threaded, I suggest you write that in a feature request. The more detailed you can be about it, the better!
Harbs

Encore CS3 - Multi-Core Processor Support?

Does Encore CS3 take advantage of multi-core processors (like the Intel Q6600)? When transcoding a video file I noticed only one CPU is at 80% and the total CPU usage in < 40%
I tired searching on "multi-core", "multicore", "multithread", "Q6600", "Quad Core", etc...

>Yes, that is totally ridiculous, we have the year 2008 now and Adobe is still not able to produce stable software that runs stable on multi-core or on 64-bit.
There are very, very few apps running in 64 bit at all right now, and XP Pro SP2 is still far stabler than the awful Vista is.
Apple do not even
i have
a 64-bit operating system at all, so please tell me what it is you're jumping ship to?
Scenarist is 32 bit.
64 bit will make very little difference at all, with the sole exception of being able to install (but not necessarily use) scads of RAM.
Multi-Core support would be nice, but with a Sonic Authorcore, that also isn't looking very likely either.
> I hope they are really ashamed of that.
If this remains to be the case we will have to hop of from adobe productline, because already now its hard to find any 32-bit windows in our office.
More fool the office then. In media production, the cardinal rule for working, stable systems is
1 - Do your due diligence & research what you need fore your platform.
2 - Run separate systems that are designed for the task in hand - you should not really be running Internet & office applications on an authoring system.
>And its really anoying sitting on a quad core and wait for transcodings for hours just because 3 cores sit there and watch one working...
I agree multicore could be useful.

Win 8.1. Core language and multi-language support.

HI,
I've used a US developed program with multi-language support for years in Win XT and Win 7. As the program now supports win 8.1. I've upgraded to 8.1. and the new release of the program. However it will not work properly and the reason given is
that my version of 8.1. has a different core language compared with what the program uses and this version is not multi-language supported. Now I wonder if there are various versions of the core language in 8.1. or is the core
language unique, supported by various language packets for menu's, guiding texts, etc. Why do I then need a multi-language supported program? Where can I put this question?
Regards
Sverre

I'd probably try them here.
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/home?forum=fsharpgeneral%2Cvcgeneral%2Cvbgeneral%2Ccsharpgeneral%2Cwindowsgeneraldevelopmentissues&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc
Regards, Dave Patrick ....
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.

Performance comparison---using LABVIEW..between Embedded and general-purpose Intel's single VS multi-core CPU

hi guys;
kindly, can any one tell me : is it possible to use Labview installed on desktop pc to show up statistically the main performance key features between mutlicore systems and single core systems but with (two versions, embedded and general purpose CPU) . in other words: I'm trying to resemble embedded cpu with general purpose CPU so that i can only work on Desktop pc than say that the obtained results are the same for embedded multicore CPU.
to get things more clear:...embedded multicore processors are now hitting the embedded market segments such as (small and portable devices with internet, multimedia and wimax tech. enabled that take advantage of recent multicore tech.).
general-puroses Multicore processors: like desktop and servers based processors,
according to what 've read, Intel is producing same processor model but with different applications : (embedded and general-purposes applications)

Hello,
Please look at this page which shows a new feature in LabVIEW 2009, but particularly interesting is the video which shows the performance benefits on a PC platform of single core VS multicore.
LabVIEW doesn't have any ability to emulate a multi-core embedded processor (unless its an intel x86 processor that labVIEW supports!) so to discover the performance benefits of embedded multicore processors, you would need an external hardware board and devise a test in which labVIEW can measure the timing via an external pin toggled by a program running on the embedded processor that could utilise multiple cores (there may be other ways but this is the way that comes to my mind).
I hope this helps you!
Mark B
===If this fixes your problem, mark as solution!===

Dual Processor Multi Core Parrell Processing Question

Hey Guys
I'm looking for a little clarification on an issue with parrell
processing in LabView. If I have a Dual Processor machine with two 4 core CPU's
will be able to access all 8 cores in the LabView environment. I'm presuming it
can use any cores the operating system can see?
Thanks for the help,
Tom
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Norbert B wrote:
it is the job of the OS that applications can use all cores if necessarry. So for the application itself, it should make no difference if the system (in hardware) is MultiCPU, MultiCore or even simply HyperThread.....
Norbert
Its true, but I would like to add my 5 cents here.
Lets say, if you have single loop like
while (true){
//do something
then OS will get no chance to run it in multiple threads. So, you will get max 12,5% CPU load at 8 cores PC or 50% max on dual core PC.
I have dual core PC right now, and lets check it:
So, as we can see - 50% CPU load reached (one core loaded more, but its another story).
Well, if we will use two while loops, then we will get 100 % load:
Of course, if you will need to load all 8 cores, then you should have 8 parallel loops.
Compare BD above with the following:
We have two Array minmax functions, and they independend, but we have 50% only.
Well, you can get also 100% CPU utulization withing single while loop. In th example below you have two SubVI, which called in the same loop:
We have here 100 %. Important, that these VIs should be reenterant!
See what happened if they not reeenterant:
Now a little bit about Vision. Behing of most of the Vision SubVIs are DLL calls. Some Vision functions already optimized for multicore execution. For example, convolution:
On the BD above we have single loop with one SubVI, but both cores are used (because convolute itself already optimized for multi core).
Remember, that not all Vision functions optimized yet. For, example, LowPass still single-threaded (compare this BD with BD above):
Sure, we can utilize multi cores - just perform parallel execution (you have to split image to two parts, then join together and so on):
Remember, that SubVIs should be reeentrant, and all DLL calls should be thred safe (not in UI thread). Also good idea to turn off debugging in such experiments for eliminate additional CPU load.
Another point about 8 cores. As far as I know, LabVIEW (and LabVIEW-based application) will support only 4 cores within one execution system by default (at least prior to LabVIEW 2009). If you need to utulize all 8 cores, then you should add some lines into LabVIEW.ini. Refer to the following thread where you can found more details:
Interpolate 1d slow on 8 core machine
Hope all written above was correct.
Thank for reading and best regards,
Andrey.
Message Edited by Andrey Dmitriev on 11-27-2009 02:50 PM

Premier Pro Queue - Multi-Core Processing

I am sure you all have thought about this but it would be nice if you take advantage of the multi-core processing of the Mac in order to run more than one Queue item at the same time.
Currently, each item in the queue has to wait but since we got multi-core systems like my Mac Pro with Dual Quad Core it would be nice to be encoding multiple projects at the same time. Or is this because it's software encoding and not hardware restriction?
I did notice in Preferences there is a Enable Parallel Encoding. Is this not multi-core processing?
Thanks,
Kenneth

Think of it this way: Intel has already announced that they are sunsetting the C2D line of processors, so purchasing something that is about ready to get phased out doesn't make much sense to me as it will quickly become outdated (some could argue that it already is outdated with the number of quadcore and higher procs coming out).
If anything, purchase one of the quad-core models to get more out of it down the line. More and more software is becoming multi-core aware, so even while an app you use now doesn't support it, it may eventually.

Photoshop Element 7 Multi Processor Support?

Will we have multiprocessor support across the entire feature set of PSE 7? I haven't seen that as part of the feature set of the new product. Today, we experience diminished functionality by having to turn off multi-processor support in order to get thumbnails to work. Just curious if that might have been included in the new product.

Paul posted his query before PSE 7 was released, but for future reference of people searching these forums:
PSE 7 fixes the notorious bug in PSE 6 in which thumbnails for raw photos were not correctly displayed on computers with multiple processors (e.g. hyperthreaded Pentiums or dual- or quad-core Duos).

X120E Multi Core Warning -The hardware is not functioning properly. What now?

Ran the Thinkpad ThinkVantage Test and received a Warning on the CPU Multi-core test.
The hardware is not functioning properly. To correct the problem:
Turn off the system.
Detach the power cord and wait for one minute.
Re-attach the power cord and re-boot the system.
Re-run the test.
Performed the above, still receiving the warning.
What next?

Have you contacted Lenovo Support? The only thing I can think of is either a straight-up hardware defect or maybe cooling fan blockage of some sort. Could be the RAM, though it's unlikely. Still, if it consistently has this issue, and something like Prime95 errors out on one of the cores, you may need to RMA it.

Last Questions on Multi Cores....

I'm sure it's been asked before so apologies in advance, first correct responses get a 'helpful' and 'solved'.
So a 2.66G quad core, does that mean it works just like 4 separate 2.66G processors? And similarly a 3.06G Core 2 Duo, is that like 2 separate 3.06G processors? And finally, what is the difference between a 'Core Duo' and a 'Core 2 Duo'??
Apologies again for these elementary questions which I'm sure you're all bored of answering by now. Thanks in advance.

It's not quite as simple as that but along those lines, if you have a Core 2 Duo 2.8GHz, although you have two 2.8Ghz processors, you can't just say that you have a 5.6 GHz machine.
Two or more Cores are only of benefit to software that support them, so if you use older software you'll often find that fewer higher speed Cores will actually give you better performance, I think multi-core is something that will come into life more in the future as software is written to take advantage of the extra cores, however at the moment, there is still little software that can use more than one or two cores.
As for the Core Duo/Core 2 Duo, the Core Duo was an earlier 32-bit chip with 2 cores (hence the core duo), they also did a Core solo edition. Core 2 is the later 64-bit Duo/Quad series of CPU's.

1 core VS multi core in a web application: performance issue

Hi,
I'm having trouble with a web application in a multi cpu server (w2ksp4, iis+wl9.2)
I have prepared a set of JMeter stress tests, and the application is only capable to finish 5 transactions in a multi cpu (2 cpus with 2 cores each) but if I bind the JVM of the weblogic process to only 1 core, then the application can handle more than 60 transactions without errors.
I'm in production side; developers tell me "hardware problem" but it seems more likely a poorly designed application (as per my previous experience with them)
The syntoms are lot of null pointers exceptions and threads stuck when in multi core scenario.
Althought I have not put lot of details, any of you have ever seen something similar?
If anybody needs further information please feel free to ask
Thanks,
Antonio

What operating system are you using?
make sure you are trying a certificated configuration JDK and OS.
Oracle Fusion Middleware Supported System Configurations
If using unix/Linux OS based you migh be hitting low entropy issue, you can add
-Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom to JAVA_OPTIONS and retest the issue
Best Regards
Luz

Multi-core processor use in CS5

If anyone can help me, I'm interested to find out is there support in CS5 Adobe programs for multi-core processors ? I would like to know this for most popular programs, like Flash, Flash Builder, Dreamweaver, Fireworks, Photoshop...

cotton.m wrote:
Try buying it dinner? Always remember though, no means no.What's the difference between a lady and a diplomat?
When a diplomat says yes, he means maybe. When he says maybe, he means no. And if he were to say no, he wouldn't be a diplomat.
When a lady says no, she means maybe. When she says maybe, she means yes. And, if she were to say yes, she wouldn't be a lady.

Multi core processing??

Hi, I've heard that multi core processors such as those in the new iMac and in the Mac Pro are only any good if the software knows how to use them properly. I am wanting to use Apples Logic Studio software, would I be better off with say a 3.06G core 2 duo, or a 2.66G i5?? For Logic only, I couldnt care about games or anything else.

Think of it this way: Intel has already announced that they are sunsetting the C2D line of processors, so purchasing something that is about ready to get phased out doesn't make much sense to me as it will quickly become outdated (some could argue that it already is outdated with the number of quadcore and higher procs coming out).
If anything, purchase one of the quad-core models to get more out of it down the line. More and more software is becoming multi-core aware, so even while an app you use now doesn't support it, it may eventually.

Light room multi core now or next version?

I am going to purchase a new Mac Pro and they come in either a single quad core with a max of 8 GB RAM or a dual quad core configuration with a max of 64 GB RAM. I'm am trying to decide if it is worth spending the extra money to get the dual quad core model or is it just money spent for features I can't enjoy.
Does the current version of Lightroom and Photoshop support the use multicore processors or will the next versions for the Mac do that?
How much RAM does one need if they have Photoshop, Lightroom, Mail, Safari open at the same time? Will Lightroom and Photoshop be able to use more RAM in their next versions?

It's not so much how an application "recognizes" multi-cores but rather how multi-threaded is the application. For example, if I import (or export) 500 images can I continue reviewing in Lr's Library module? The answer, of course, is yes.
Whether a single quad or dual qauds make a difference is entirely dependent on your processing.
Here's some information on hardware requirements for Photoshop: http://www.adobepress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1247538&seqNum=2

Multi-Core support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for