Multi Filter conditions on same report

Hi,
I've a report with different filter conditions.
how to add those two reports ?i tired to add same report with different filter condition in pivot, but it is not allowing me to do this.
Can any one help me out .
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Check properly weather you applied filters correctly or not for both the reports.I chekced it in my machine and its working fine.
Using combine with similar request also may not show much difference as you are getting final report as single one.Better to go for two different reports.
Regards,
Srikanth

Similar Messages

Issue in using presentation variable as filter condition in the reports

Hi,
I have an issue in using presentation variable as filter condition in my reports the details are as follows:
Details :
We want to implement the Max and Min variables through Presentation variables only.we do not want to implement it through session variables in this case.
We have two variables MIN and MAX to be used as Presentation Variables,for a column of the report (which is a quantity),so that the user wants to see the data for this column within a particular range.i.e the Min and the Max.This part has been implemented well . The issue is when the user wants to see the full data.In that case we will not pass any values to these two Presentation Variable or in other words we are not restricting the report data so we are not passing any value to the variables,this is when the report is throwing the error. we want to leave this variables blank in that case.but this is giving error.
Please suggest how can I overcome this issue.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Praveen

i think you have to use guided navigation for this. create two reports first is the one you are having currently and second is the one in which remove the presentation variable from the column formula. i.e. the same report with no aggregation applied.
Now create a dummy report and make it return value only when the presentation variable value is not equal to max or min. guide the report to navigate between the first and second report based on the result of the dummy report.

2 same surrogate keys with different filter conditions in one report

how do we put 2 same sr keys with different filter conditions in one single report??
for example, we have to get the 'count' for tm_sr_key:
1. count(tm_sr_key) where past_due_flag = Y
2. count(tm_sr_key) where past_due_flag = Y and N
to be displayed in one single report.
it happens that both sr_keys will display the same measure (which is the 1st filter conditions)
and the filter under criteria tab in anwer will show as :
tm_sr_key where {filter condition 1}
AND
tm_sr_key where {filter condition 2}
instead of :
tm_sr_key where {filter condition 1} for 1st measure
tm_sr_key where {filter condition 2} for 2nd measure
d only option i could think right now is to duplicate the tm_sr_key data in the same table but with different name say, tm_sr_key_2..
kindly pls help.
thanx

i'm sorry, not really understand.
could you pls explain a bit more about the filter column? how do we do it? coz i'm really new in this tool.
r u talking about editing the filter located under the column on the right side of the OBIEE answers?
or is it by editing the 'edit column formula' for required column; that is by replacing the 'column formula' expression with this:
FILTER(EXPS_FACT.FAC_SR_KEY USING EXPS_FACT.PAST_DUE_FLAG = 'Y') <----if it is like this, i tried it already & its giving me an error message..
thanx.
Edited by: rezza.nasha on May 28, 2009 1:26 AM

Getting active filter conditions from interactive reports

I have been having trouble with how to properly get the filter conditions that a user has applied to an interactive report. I have tried to get at this information using the Apex defined view APEX_APPLICATION_PAGE_IR_COND. However, the problem I am running into is if the user ends their session without first removing their filter conditions, those conditions remain in this view the next time (and any future times) the report is accessed. I can not seem to determine how to tell which filter conditions are actually active in the report. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I've done several tests, and the results I'm getting are not like that, if it were there would be no problem. The exact steps I'm doing is setting an arbitrary filter on an interactive report, and then logging out. When I log back in the view still shows those filter conditions, but no records are filtered on the actual report. I've tried this on two separate installations of apex (one 3.1, the other 3.2) and the results are the same. Is this irregular? Or has anyone else found a workaround for this.

Filter condition for Webi report scheduling

Hello,
I have a Webi report with a query that has one filter (it states the starting and ending date of data to be displayed in the report). This report has to be scheduled but it has to contain different filter values each time the report is run.
I'd like to know if there is a way to schedule this report taking into account that each iteration of the scheduling process has to use different values for the filter.
On the same way, the Webi report has a XY diagram with a text title made up of a fixed literal label. Is there any way to inject the text title from the scheduling process (in order to avoid editing the report before each scheduling iteration occurs)?
Thanks a lot!

Victor,
one filter (it states the starting and ending date of data to be displayed in the report). This report has to be scheduled but it has to contain different filter values each time
There are a couple of ways to handle this requirement, depending upon other environmental factors. Here is one method, but it requires the ability to update/change data at the database using an external tool (anything that permits processing transactional information).
You can set up an additional table with two columns: starting_date and ending_date
Someone updates the additional table as appropriate before the next run will kick off in the schedule.
The tricky part is in getting your current report to incorporate the other table, and for this you may need to either create a view in your database or a derived table in your universe. Here is the rudimentary SQL structure that might work for you:
create table start_end_dates (beginning_date datetime,end_date datetime)
go
insert into start_end_dates values ('9/1/2009','9/30/2009')
go
create table my_data (col_a char(1),month_id datetime)
go
insert into my_data values ('a','9/1/2009')
insert into my_data values ('a','10/1/2009')
go
select *
from my_data
where month_id >= (select beginning_date from start_end_dates) and
month_id <= (select end_date from start_end_dates)
The start_end_dates table is the one that receives a single input, populated with the starting and ending date of data. The "my_data" table is an example of how the source table can call in the "parameters" of the "start_end_dates" table to fulfill its quest for filtering (additional filtering on other things within your scenario can also be applied).
Once you can get the mechanics of the SQL to work for you (either in the universe or a view), then you can set the report up to work hand-in-glove with the above structure. In the report, you can either have a second data provider that selects on the "start_end_dates" table, storing that data in the report and displaying it somewhere, or you could use the min(month_id) and max(month_id) concepts and display that somewhere too.
Thanks,
John

Difference in Query generated by OBIEE for same report

Hi,
I am using a a report(X) in a filter condition.
I am seeing a peculiar issue with OBIEE server. When i am running a report(X) alone, the query generated is different. But when i am using the same report in filter condition of other report(Y), the same report is generating some other query. The first report(X) is running fine but the second(Y) is not running at all.
Case 1(Report X) Query: The report is breaking into 3 parts for different fact tables and combining the data to give result.
Case 2(Report Y): A single query is being formed and within it is fecthing the data from different fact tables using subqueries.
Case2 is creating a lot of problem as the performance is totally poor.
Any suggesstions??
Thanks
Tataji

Hi, we haven't debugged the application or traced the query against the production server (it's in our customer's office) buy I think there's no difference since the query itself has been tested using sqldeveloper against both servers (XE 11.2 and Enterprise 11.1) and the behavior is consistent. By consistent I mean:
- The query executed via sqldeveloper against Oracle XE 11.2 runs ok and so does the application.
- The query executed via sqldeveloper against Oracle Enterprise 11.1 fails with an ORA-01790 error, and so does the application (exceptions are being logged in the Event Log).
To sum up: the same query runs ok in Oracle XE 11.2 and fails in Oracle Enterprise 11.1.
Additional information: we have tried explicit casting the NULL literals to the corresponding data types (in the UNION ALLs) and the query works fine in both versions. ¿Is there an option in ODAC to tell the query generator to write this explicit castings?
Regarding the DB schema and the LINQ query, I'll be sending them asap.
Regards,
Ernesto.

Filter condition not working when Navigating from Main report to detail

Hello,
I have one report in OBIEE 10.3.4. Below is the filter condition used in Main report:-
(Customer Secondary Organization is equal to / is in BMS OTHER C
AND Customer Tertiary Organization is equal to / is in S&FO )
OR Customer Secondary Organization is equal to / is in MKTG
Also in my detail report I am using the same filter conditions:-
(Customer Secondary Organization is equal to / is in BMS OTHER C
AND Customer Tertiary Organization is equal to / is in S&FO)
OR Customer Secondary Organization is equal to / is in MKTG
Now when I am navigating from Main report to Detail report, then this filter condition is getting overridden by below condition:-
Customer Secondary Organization is equal to MKTG
and Customer Tertiary Organization is equal to S&FO
or Customer Secondary Organization is equal to MKTG
What I noticed is If I rearrange the filters and make it as below:-
(Customer Secondary Organization is equal to / is in MKTG
AND Customer Tertiary Organization is equal to / is in S&FO)
OR Customer Secondary Organization is equal to / is in BMS OTHER C
Then I am getting the filter in detail report as:-
Customer Secondary Organization is equal to BMS OTHER C
and Customer Tertiary Organization is equal to S&FO
or Customer Secondary Organization is equal to BMS OTHER C
It is taking Secondary Organization which is 2nd one in the main report.
Can anyone please help me on this.
Thank You,
Shivam Saxena

Hi,
What you can try is refer the filte condition in the main report to the detailed report with the option--> Filter based on another request.
Or you try creating another intermediate report which will refer the main report filters and pass the filters to the detailed report.
Hope this helps.
Regards
MuRam

How to create one filter for N views in the same report

Hello everybody,
I need to have the same filter for diferent views that I have in the same report. Anyone knows how to do it?
Thanks in advance
Mario Mesquita

Hi,
In India site, you can create a SMTP connector which point to the local ISP.
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

How to apply Filter condition for a specific column but not to the report?

Hi,
I am having a issue in applying a filter condition to one of the column.
I have a schema with one fact table and around 10 dimension tables. My requirement is to bring a count on the fact table with related to some other columns from the dimension tables.
Lets consider a scenario with tables like Sales (Fact), Region (Dimension), Year(Dimension), Sale Type (Dimension).
Now my requirement is to bring out the fields
City(Region) --City
Year -- Year
Sales Count(Sales table) ---Count of all sales from the fact table
Sales Count(Sales table) -- Count of all sales from the fact table where sales type is 'CASH'
Here my issue is how do I apply the filter condition of Sales Type='CASH' only on one of the Sales Count column which is from the fact table. I want the filter condition to be imposed only for the fourth column.
Can anyone let me know how to achieve this?
Thanks

This is quite simpe. Edit the column formula for the 4th column and put something like this. I am doing this from memory so the syntax might need checking:
Case When "Dimension Table"."Sales Type"='CASH' Then "Fact Table"."Measure" Else Null End
You could also consider making this a permanent addition to your RPD if this measure will be used again and again. You would add a new logical column and use the expression builder to arrive at the same result.

Create two logical columns with same LTS mapping but diff filter conditions

Hi,
Problem:
How to create two logical columns within same logical table mapped to same physical column but different filter conditions?
I have a scenario where in,
Physical layer columns
     - table1.employee
     - table1.emp_city
I need a columns in logical layer:
Logical layer - lt1.count_emp_delhi (counts distinct employees whose city_name = 'Delhi')
          lt1.count_emp_mumbai(counts distinct employees whose city_name = 'Mumbai')
My approach:
For Delhi column
1. Create a logical column lt1.count_emp_delhi mapped to the physical column table1.employee
2. Aggregate using countdistinct in aggregate tab.
3. Edit the mapping condition
     3.1. Use the where clause and set table1.emp_city='Delhi'.
For Mumbai column.
Followed the same approach as above but in 3.1 if I change the condition to 'Mumbai', even the delhi column is populated with mumbai count which is ERRONEOUS
Could some one please help?

Hi,
1. Create two alias tables for table1 in Physical Layer. Lets say TB_Mumbai and TB_Delhi
2. Create a logical table in BMM layer (D1 Employee Cities )
3. Drag and drop the employee & emp_city columns from both alias tables (TB_Mumbai and TB_Delhi ) into your newly created logical table.
4. Now you can see two Logical Table Sources (TB_Mumbai and TB_Delhi )
5. Now using Where condition, write the condition on each table
NOTE: Don't write any condition on the Physical table Table1.
Hope it helps you.
Regards,
Kalyan Chukkapalli
http://123obi.com

How to hide saved report filter condition

Hello,
I create an IR report and pre-create some saved report.
I would like to hide filter condition when end-user select one report on the list so that he/she cannot see and delete the condition.
Is there anyway to do that?
Thank you.

Another approach:
Open view CRM_WORKAREAHDR/WorkAreaHeader and change the configuration. There is a button in the bar named "Attributes" (probably hidden under MORE).
Once in there in edit mode substitute the content of attribute "UI_COMPONENT_3". It should be
Window=CRM_ALLSEARCHES.CRM_ALLSEARCHES/LauncherWindow;horizontalAlignment=right;
put there a
Width=0px;
The other way using business role is fine as well.
cheers Carsten

Apply a filter condition in Dev. Report Reports Parameter Form...!

In parameter input form, I want to apply a filter condition on second list box field, depending upon first list box field.
For example, I have two user input parameter fields
     1.     Deptno
     2.     Empno
Now while selecting a department number say 20 from first list box field, then in the second list box filed, there should only be shown /appeared those employees, whom department numbers are 20 (Employees belongs to department number 20).
How can I apply this sort of filter condition on second field of Parameter Form, which I had just got from the first list box field?
Farhan Mazhar

hello,
the reports parameterform provides only limited form building capabilities. if you are running oracle forms, you could build the parameter-form with forms. if you are running your reports on the web, you could build a parameter-form in HTML and JavaScript.
in fact we are working on an example on how to build such a parameterform in reports and we will make it downloadable from OTN soon.
regards,
the oracle reports team --pw

Filter condition in query designer

Hi Friends,
Can any one please tell me?
Query is done on Multiprovider (made of Cube 1 to Cube 6 ) and in query designer under filter tab i have seen
case 1:
1) Fiscal year variant F4
2) Cube 1
Questions:
1) what is the use of Fiscal year variant F4 in this case?
2) Field 1 is available in all 6 cubes. In report from which cube the data is retreived for this filed 1?
Next case 2:
Under filter condition
1) Fiscal year variant F4
2) Cube 1 and cube 2
Question: Field 1 is available in all six cubes. in report from which cube the data is retrevied for this field 1.
Thanks
Tony

We have a similar situation with three cubes. However, when we run the query in Q, the filter (restriction) works well and we get the output only from one cube.
When the query is moved to Production (transport), with same restrictions, the query is not getting restricted for one cube initially, but hitting all three cubes in the multi provider...and hence taking a much longer time to process..
Any ideas what could be going wrong (the query is on an aggregate level, for IP)

Web Dynpro ALV table contents from context comes without filter conditions

Hi Experts,
Please help me to solve this problem.
I set some selfmade functions on tool bar of my WD ALV,
and it works OK, but when I set some filter conditions,
I get same table contents in my method ONFUNCTION.
What can I do?
Thank you very much
Irena

My question was about option Filter of ALV report.
May be somebody knows how I can receive Interfacecontroller
attributes: FILTER_VALUES. It should help to filter
table inside code( in my ONFUNCTION method).
Regards
Irena

Creating a Detail Table Based on an Action in Another Table or Matrix to Display in the Same Report (Not a Drill-Through)

Hello,
I was wondering if it's possible have a matrix which shows total credits by month and have drill-down groupings to display the invoice numbers for each credit. Then, once the drill-down is expanded for a particular month, be able to click on the invoice
number and have another table under the matrix display the details of the invoice.
I don't really want a drill-through because that opens a different report in the window, what I want to be able to do is stay on the main report. I also don't want to drill-into the invoice details from the matrix as that expands the matrix out and
makes it unruly and ugly. I've been playing with subreports but not able to get what I want out of it.
I hope this makes sense - is there a way to do this in SSRS?
Thanks!!

Hi AvenueStuart,
After testing the issue in my environment, we can refer to the steps below to work around the issue:
Create a new table with the details of the invoice under the matrix.
Add a parameter named invoice which get available values from the invoice field in the dataset.
Right-click the [Sum(invoice)] cell to add an action with “Go to report” option, and specify the same report with the parameter below:
Name: invoice
Value: [invoice]
Right-click the table to add a filter in the table:
Expression: [invoice]
Operator: =
Value: [@invoice]
If there are any misunderstanding, please elaborate the issue for further investigation.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Multi Filter conditions on same report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for