Multi-Mapping Error after copying into new namespace

Hi everybody,
we got a BPM running using a multi-mapping.
We decided to design new namespaces. After copying every IR object (datatype, message-type, mappings etc.) --> SXMB_MONI shows a mapping-error.
But when I take the payload and test the mapping, everything is fine?
Any ideas?
Regards Mario

Hi,
If your payload has Messages tab remove that..and test the payload.
Payload doesn't have any Messages tab.
Just i have given example payload..this payload two strucures it will split into twofiles..and compare your payload should be like same
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<STRUCTURE>
<EMP_DETAILS>
   <EMPNO>123<EMPNO>
   <EMPNAME>XYZ<EMPNAME>
<EMP_DETAILS>
<STUDENT_DET>
   <STUO>123<STUNO>
   <STUNAME>XYZ<STUNAME>
</STUDENT_DET>
<STRUCTURE>
Regards,
Venu.

Similar Messages

Error while activating objects copied into new namespace.

I am receiving the following error when I am trying to activate objects copied from an existing namespace to new namespace.
What could be the reason ?
Activation of the change list canceled Check result for Message Mapping MM_BBP_ESI_ERP_CONTRACT | http://frictionless.esource.com/v2.1: Namespace http://frictionless.esource.com/v2.1 is not defined in the software component version FCI, 1.0 of frictionless.com Namespace http://frictionless.esource.com/v2.1 is not defined in the software component version FCI, 1.0 of frictionless.com

Hi,
How about activation namespace objects in tab "Change List"?
Regards,
Jakub

Strange Data Mapping Errors after SEM 6 Upgrade. Please assist.

Hi All, I encountered these sudden Mapping errors after I tried to do Testing in Post Upgrade Sand Box. Here I am trying to to perform Collected Reported Financial Data under Data Collection Method for a particular Company Code 3040. Kindly help me with some quick responses as this is kind of high priority. The errors and the Diagnosis Notes I am unable to follow as I do not where I shall write those Mapping Rules they are referring to. I do not even know if that need to apply any SAP Notes as such. Once again Highly appreciate your quick response and Many Thanks in Advance.
Regards, BIP
Input conversion for field Period Value LC has invalid format Message no. UCT8210 Diagnosis The mapping rule for target field Period Value LC contains a move with a selected Input Conversion indicator. Therefore, the system performs an input conversion prior to creating the target data. However, an error in the input conversion occurred while moving the source key figure to the target key figure Period Value LC. This means that the format used for the input conversion is incompatible with the target data. System Response The system will not perform the move. Procedure Examine the mapping rule for field Period Value LC. Either select the Conversion Exit indicator or deselect the Input Conversion indicator. Execute the method again. -
3040 is incompatible with input format for field /1FB/COMPANY Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field /1FB/COMPANY from the mapping rule for the target field. 3040 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field /1FB/COMPANY. However, the value 3040 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 3040 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field /1FB/COMPANY. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field /1FB/COMPANY. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field /1FB/COMPANY has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (3040) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 3040 for field /1FB/COMPANY and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field /1FB/COMPANY, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field /1FB/COMPANY in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field /1FB/COMPANY. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Version Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Version has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Version. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Version. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Versionthrough mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Version so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Version. -
Cannot derive the source selection from target field Group Currency Message no. UCT8252 Diagnosis Field Group Currency has one of the following roles: Consolidation unit Group currency key Fiscal year Posting period Version To delimit the volume of the source data to be read, the system usually derives the source selection from the target selection of such a field. However, the system cannot derive a source selection from field Group Currency. System Response It is possible that a greater volume of source data is being read than is necessary. This can lead to performance issues. Procedure Check whether a mapping rule is defined for field Group Currency. If a mapping rule is defined, you can disregard this warning message. However, if you discover after method execution that the system did not process a large amount of data, and that system performance was not satisfactory, you may want to examine the source selection by choosing the Source button in the log. If the reason for the disregarded data is that too much source data was read because of the unrestricted selection on the source field (which is linked with target field Group Currency through mapping), choose one of the alternatives below: Change the mapping rule for field Group Currency so that the system can derive a delimiting source selection. Implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER with the method INVERT to delimit the selection for the source field that is linked via mapping to the target field Group Currency
1 is incompatible with input format for field FISCPERIOD Message no. UCT8258 Diagnosis During execution, the method derives the source selection for source field FISCPERIOD from the mapping rule for the target field. 1 is one of the values that were derived for the source selection. The system requires that this value is in the correct SAP-internal format because the Conversion Exit indicator has been selected in the move operator for field FISCPERIOD. However, the value 1 is incompatible with the SAP-internal format. System Response The system attempts to interpret value 1 as an external format and convert it to the internal format. If this fails, the system is unable to restrict the source selection using source field FISCPERIOD. In this case, the system may read more source data than was originally intended, which can affect performance. Procedure In the log, choose the Source button to display the source selections that are used to read the source data. When this appears, examine values selected for field FISCPERIOD. If the correct values were selected, you can ignore this message. To prevent this message from being issued, you can select the indicator in the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD. If incorrect values were selected, make sure that the mapping rule used by source field FISCPERIOD has been defined correctly. If the mapping rule is correct and value (1) derived for the source selection does not affect the overall result, you can ignore this message. If the source selection does not contain the value 1 for field FISCPERIOD and, because of this, source data that is supposed to be read is not being read, make sure that the mapping rule has been defined correctly. If the source selection does not contain any value for field FISCPERIOD, make an estimation as to how much excess source data is being read and whether this might affect system performance. If you do not expect any performance problems, you can ignore this message. In any event, you have the following alternatives if the mapping rule is defined correctly, but the source selection on field FISCPERIOD is unsatisfactory: You can define a source selection for field FISCPERIOD in the Customizing settings for the method on the Selection tab page. Then the method uses this source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule. You can implement the Business Add-In (BAdI) UC_DATATRANSFER and use the method INVERT to determine the source selection on field FISCPERIOD. Then the method uses the result of the INVERT method for the source selection instead of the source selection derived from inverse interpretation of the mapping rule
Input must be in the format ___,___,__~ Message no. 00088 Diagnosis Your entry does not match the specified input format. System Response The entry in this field was rejected. Procedure The entry must comply with the edit format. The following edit format characters have a special meaning: "_" (underscore) There should be an input character at this point; this should be a number for numeric fields. "." (decimal point) (applies to numeric fields) The decimal point occurs here (setting in the user master record). "," (thousands separator) (applies to numeric fields) This separator occurs (optionally) for more than three figures. Depending on the setting in the user master record, it can be a period or a comma. "V" (applies to numeric fields) The operational sign appears here. If used, it must by at the right margin of the field. The sign is either "-" or " "(space). "~" (tilde) (applies to numeric fields) As of and including this character, leading zeros must also be entered. Otherwise, this character has the same meaning as an underscore. Leading zeros need not be entered on the left of the tilde. They are not output at this position. All other characters have their normal meanings and must be entered in the same position as in the edit format.

Hi Dan,
Could you Kiindly advise me where we need to write the Mapping Rules in Consolidation Monitor? All he time the errors refering to Mapping Rules. The only Tab I seen "Mapping" is in Data Basis But as per my Understanding Iwe do not have much to do there as it is system generated Mapping Tab.
Where we actually go and select/deselct those Input Conversion Indicator/ Conversion exit Indicator.
Highly appreciate your advise.
Thanks and Regards,
BIP

Multi Mapping error

Hi,
I am required to have a IP recieve 3 IDOC types triggered from BD10 . It can trigger 3 or more IDOCs. For Eg.
1 ARTMAS (only 1) , 2 INFRECs and 1 LIKOND.
If anyone IDOC has come then after a waiting period of 1 minute it should come out of FORK.
My IP is like this.
In a FORK there are 4 branches.
1) ARTMAS receiver
2) Loop(infinite) with INFREC Receiver and a Container Operation to collect all IDOCs
3) Loop(infinite) with LIKOND Receiver and a Container Operation to collect all IDOCs
4) A wait Step with a container operation to initialize endtime variable
necesary branches: 4
The Fork Comes out when the end condition is met ie the End variable is Set or if all the IDOCS have come.
Corelation on MATNR.
Next I have the transormation and send step.
In the MM i have 3 Source and 1 Target.
Artmas 0-1 occurance
INFREC 0 - unbounded
LINKND 0-unbounded
I have created the Target with External Definition and have set the correct occurance in the XSD file
I have mapped the neceessary Segments from INFREC and LIKOND and all the Segments of ARTMAS to the Target structure.
In SXMBMONI it says error on Outbound side and
I see Mapping Exception when I seen in WORKFLOW.
Is my design Correct?
I have tested the Interface & Message Mapping they are correct
Request your help.
John Rajesh
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <MappingTrace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Namespace:http://test.com/usa/SapRetail/ARTICLE_CLASSIFY/TESTDEMO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Name:IM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:00000000000000000000000000000000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Multi mapping required.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Creating Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Load b8f12d30-2c45-11da-90af-ef160a892024, http://test.com/usa/SapRetail/ARTICLE_CLASSIFY/TESTDEMO, -1, com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_.class.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_.class (http://test.com/usa/SapRetail/ARTICLE_CLASSIFY/TESTDEMO, -1) in swcv b8f12d30-2c45-11da-90af-ef160a892024.</Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">RuntimeException during appliction Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns4:Messages/ns4:Message1/ZARTMAS04_PUB/IDOC. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start(AMappingProgram.java:292) at

Check the following
1. Have u mapped the root level element?
2. Inside interface mapping, when u say read interface, is it diplaying both the interface.
Also check ur input
may be u r not providing proper input
Regards,
Prateek

Multi-Mapping Error in PI 7.1 - External Definitions

Hi all,
We have just upgraded to PI 7.1 from 7.0 and run into an issue with message multi-mappings, just wondered if anyone else had met the same issue and worked it out...
When creating a message mapping, we are using as the target an external definition which is defined by an XSD generated by a third party tool (Seeburger).
When I map 1:1 (1 source message to one target message) in the message mapper, all is fine but if I try to create a multi mapping, I get an error. The process is:
a) I have a message mapping with one target message, defined as an External Definition.
b) I then go to Signature tab and add a second target message as an External Definition
c) Click back to Definition tab
d) Get the error "Object XXXXX | YYYYY not found" - where XXXXX is the external def name and YYYYY is the namespace (the SWCV namespace that is, not the XML namespace)
This only seems to happen with External Definitions which are autogenerated and I strongly suspect that is has to do with the fact that the tool that generates them always does so without an XML namespace. I have not proved this though (other Ext Defs with namespaces work for multi-mappings but that is not the only difference so I can't be sure that is the issue but have a strong hunch. This problem did not occur in 7.0.
Anyone got any ideas?
Thanks,
Chris

Hi,
This would not be of much help but, I was able to encounter this issue in XI 3.0.
What we did was to manually edit the XSD and add a namespace to it. I'm not sure if PI 7.1 is able to handle mutiple namespaces, so we limited it to this value <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> and made sure that this value is used for all the External Definitions used in the multi-mapping.
Regards,

SP14 Multi-mapping - error in receiver idoc adapter

Hi,
I have a scenario where a business service should send some XML to SAP CRM. I get the file via a sender JMS adapter and try to post it to CRM via a receiver IDOC adapter.
I have created a multimapping (1:N - 1 XML file to many Idocs) as should in the repository.
In the configuration under Interface Determination, I have chosen 'RB_SPLIT' and selected the interface multimapping.
It should be pointed out, that when testing both interface and message mapping i get no error. All idocs seem to be created as they should.
When testing the setup 'real life' the message fails. The error message in the monitor says:
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_WRONG_INTF</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>InterfaceCollection</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Unable to interpret IDoc interface InterfaceCollection</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Notice that the above error is when trying to send only 1 record, which in turn then should result in only 1 idoc.
If trying to send multiple XML records, i get the following error:
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">MMF_ENGINETYPE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>A system error occurred in the outbound binding</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
In the monitor in the payload of 'Request message mapping' I see as many Maindocument, Submaindocument pairs as should be Idocs.
Now i really don't know how to interpret the error messages in both cases, so I'm a little lost here...
It should be pointed out that the idoc being used everywhere in this scenario, has not been modified - from all places it is being used (and only exists) in the 'Imported objects | Idocs' place.
Also the Idoc is also being used as Inbound interface - so no mistakes here either.
I really hope someone can help me here, as I'm otherwise pretty stuck in this case.
Best regards,
Daniel

Hi Daniel,
I have exactly the same type of scenario (under SPS14 and now also SPS15), sending an XML message over JMS to XI and trying a multi-mapping to many IDocs (actually a list of orders in XML is mapped to n ORDERS Idocs).
I also face problems doing so, when I use the IDoc Adapter as outbound in the Receiver Agreement. I receive the following error:
<i>CO_TXT_MMF_ENGINETYPE
Messages in multi message format can be sent to one adapter engine only</i>
However, I tested the same scenario by just changing the Receiver Agreement to a File Communication Channel and - surprise, surprise - it works. One file per IDoc is created.
Of course, this is not what we want to accomplish, but when I checked this piece of documentation (sorry another link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/content.htm
the IDoc adapter is not listed in the list of Adapters that are supported. Does that mean, that this feature is not supported for generating IDocs? Maybe that's a question for a SAP OSS Message?
I hope that helped you a little further - if you find out more I'd be happy to learn about it.
regards,
Peter

Mail messages missing after copying to new folder

I am recovering some email messages and have imported the mbox into a new folder. It contains 8860 messages.
When I copy these messages to the inbox, about 750 messages do not copy over. There is no warning that the file copy is incomplete.
Also If I try to export the mailbox, not all of the mail message are exported.
It seems very difficult to find out what is causing the problem.
I had already rebuilt the mailbox before attempting to copy it to the inbox folder.
Anyone have any experience with mail messages going missing files after copying them to a new folder within mail?

I am recovering some email messages and have imported the mbox into a new folder. It contains 8860 messages.
When I copy these messages to the inbox, about 750 messages do not copy over. There is no warning that the file copy is incomplete.
Also If I try to export the mailbox, not all of the mail message are exported.
It seems very difficult to find out what is causing the problem.
I had already rebuilt the mailbox before attempting to copy it to the inbox folder.
Anyone have any experience with mail messages going missing files after copying them to a new folder within mail?

Error after copying and modifying a page in APEX

I have copied (duplicated) and modified a "Form on a Table with Report" in my application.
The new form does the same as the old one, but it uses a different database table. The original form was made with the help of APEX.
After I corrected the table and field names in the new form, I experienced the following error:
The row edit icons on the new form refer to the records of the OLD table. If I click on them, the record edit screen appears with the content of the row in the old table. This causes an other error too, because the record number in the new table doesn't always point to an existing record in the old one. In this case I get an error: ORA-01403: no data found / Error Unable to fetch row.
I don't know where to correct this hyperlink, I guess this is an automated link from the XE !?
Thanks for any help in advance.

Please post Application Express related issues on the dedicated forum at Oracle Application Express (APEX)
Links' attributes are set at form creation time only so after copying they refer to the same objects the base page does.
Przemek

The Maps Error after update software

Before update software, maps run normally, after upsate software maps error 1013. How fix this error??? @_#*?"';:£ very bad update

Did you sort it ? and if so how ?

One Transport request objects copy into new transport request

Dear Experts,
I created a transport request under which i saved my objects. <b>Now i need to copy old request objects into new request or split that transport request into number of new transport requests.</b> First of all It is possible or not , if it is possible please tell me the solution how to do.
Regards,
Krishna

Hello Krishna
You can
(1) add object lists of already released requests ("old" requests) to you current request (still changeable)
(2) merge changeable transport requests together
(3) split a changeable request into several requests
Whereas (1) and (2) are supported by standard functions of the SAP system (3) is a manual task involving the following steps:
a.) Create a new request
b.) Copy required transport entries (e.g. R3TR TABL ZMYTABLE) from one request to the new request
c.) Delete all copied transport entries from the object list of the "first" request
However, if you are not fully aware of the dependencies between different transport object entries the splitting of object lists may cause hassle when you import the splitted requests into the next SAP system.
Regards
Uwe

"Original file not found" error after copying from removable hard drive

ok, I have all my itunes library on a removable hard drive, and I want to copy it all to my new computer. so, I plugged the hard drive in, copied all the files into itunes, and when I played one of them, it worked. then, I tried to play it again, but an error message came up saying "The song 'Re-hash'could not be used because the original file could not be found. Would you like tyo locate it?" and I clicked 'Yes'. then a browser came up, where i could select either the files itunes music, itunes library, or itunes music library. none of them work. help please?

This worked although it was very clumsy (we had almost 3,000 files that had to be deleted and redownloaded. I could not figure out a way to sort all of the 'exclamation points' together so it took an hour or so to scan through the entire library list and delete each file individually and/or in small groups.) The download was very straight forward. In my experience (with iTunes match turned on,) we did NOT loose our playcounts.
Going through all those files I noticed several common themes that may have triggered the problem: 1) multiple artists, 2) special characters in the song title, artist and/or album name - particularly umlauts (we have quite a few german songs in our library.) 3) very long title, artist and/or album names.
I hope that someone from Apple is aware of these issues and working on them....

Error after setting up new Taskflow

I have copied the existing taskflow in HRMS application "US HRMS PERSON TASKFLOW" and created a new one. Every node in the new taskflow is the same as the old one, only I have added one node in this new taskflow.
However, after assigning this taskflow to a function when I click on that button which points to the new node, I get the below error:
Function not available to this responsibility. Change responsibilities or contact your System Administrator.
Does anyone know the solution for this.

Seeing as your question is a Oracle Enterprise Business Suite (EBS) question, please post it in the [EBS General Discussion|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=475] forum where you will have greater success in getting your question answered.
Craig...

[SOLVED] GPGME error after chrooting for new installs

There is another thread about this topic, but it is marked as solved. But obviously this error is not solved because new installs are failing.
The problem: after installing the base system with pacstrap and chrooting into the system, there are some very ugly errors when trying to install any additional packages.
Pacman gives the following output:
warning: GPGME error: Invalid crypto engine
File XYZ is corrupted (invalid vor corrupted package (PGP signature)
Do you want to delete it?
Since i installed arch just a few days ago on the same system with different SSD, this error seems to come from the server side. But i am no expert at all, so i have no idea what's wrong.
I tried to delete the etc/pacman.d/gnupg folder and running pacman-key --init, but this is not working.
Last edited by tumas (2014-01-13 18:37:18)

Update the system from the install disk with pacman --root <mountpoint> -Syu. The problem is that you installed at exactly the wrong time, when all of the packages that use gcrypt were updated but libgcrypt wasn't.
Last edited by Scimmia (2014-01-13 18:29:37)

Error after installing the new JSF release

I've got a problem to install the new JSF release. I downloaded the Web Services Developer Pack 1.3 from the homepage and installed it. Then, i downloaded the actual release of the JSF 1.0 as a zip file. I removed the existing jsf directory in the original WSDP and extracted the zip file into the home directory of the WSDP. Then I renamed the directory from jsf-1.0 to jsf and started the tomcat again.
But then I get the following errors and tomcat isn't working at all:
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:52 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init
INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on port 8080
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:52 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina load
INFO: Initialization processed in 3297 ms
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:52 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService start
INFO: Starting service Java Web Services Developer Pack
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:52 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Java Web Services Developer Pack/1.3
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:52 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost getDeployer
INFO: Create Host deployer for direct deployment ( non-jmx )
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:53 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Processing Context configuration file URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\conf\Catalina\localhost\jwsdp-catalog.xml
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart
SEVERE: Skipped installing application listeners due to previous error(s)
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Error listenerStart
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Context startup failed due to previous errors
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:54 PM org.apache.catalina.logger.LoggerBase stop
INFO: unregistering logger Catalina:type=Logger,path=/jwsdp-catalog,host=localhost
Mar 19, 2004 1:43:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Processing Context configuration file URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\conf\Catalina\localhost\jstl-examples.xml
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:03 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Processing Context configuration file URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\conf\Catalina\localhost\jsf-cardemo.xml
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:14 PM com.sun.faces.config.rules.NavigationRuleRule end
WARNING: [NavigationRuleRule]{faces-config/navigation-rule} Merge(/confirmChoices.jsp)
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:16 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Processing Context configuration file URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\conf\Catalina\localhost\jsf-nonjsp.xml
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:27 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Processing Context configuration file URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\conf\Catalina\localhost\jsf-components.xml
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:40 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Processing Context configuration file URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\conf\Catalina\localhost\jsf-guessNumber.xml
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:52 PM com.sun.faces.config.ConfigureListener verifyObjects
INFO: Application object verification completed successfully
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:52 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Processing Context configuration file URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\conf\Catalina\localhost\admin.xml
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:53 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart
SEVERE: Skipped installing application listeners due to previous error(s)
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:53 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Error listenerStart
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:53 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Context startup failed due to previous errors
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:53 PM org.apache.catalina.logger.LoggerBase stop
INFO: unregistering logger Catalina:type=Logger,path=/admin,host=localhost
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:53 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Processing Context configuration file URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\conf\Catalina\localhost\manager.xml
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart
SEVERE: Skipped installing application listeners due to previous error(s)
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Error listenerStart
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Context startup failed due to previous errors
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Installing web application at context path from URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\webapps\ROOT
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart
SEVERE: Skipped installing application listeners due to previous error(s)
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Error listenerStart
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Context startup failed due to previous errors
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:54 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Installing web application at context path /jsp-examples from URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\webapps\jsp-examples
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:55 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart
SEVERE: Skipped installing application listeners due to previous error(s)
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:55 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Error listenerStart
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:55 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Context startup failed due to previous errors
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:55 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostDeployer install
INFO: Installing web application at context path /servlets-examples from URL file:H:\jwsdp-1.3\webapps\servlets-examples
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:56 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart
SEVERE: Skipped installing application listeners due to previous error(s)
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:56 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Error listenerStart
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:56 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Context startup failed due to previous errors
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:56 PM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol start
INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on port 8080
Mar 19, 2004 1:44:56 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
INFO: Server startup in 63891 ms
So what's wrong with my installation.
kind regards, Ingo

Your server may be in an unstable state if you did not remove all of the old cached files.
I recommend you clear out your <JWSDP_HOME>/work directory and remove all the <JWSDP_HOME>/conf/Catalina/localhost/jsf* files and restart your server.
Thanks,
Justyna

Publish Error after copying domain file from one mac to another

Hello there,
so here is the problem: I have had iweb installed on a MBP, and a website up and running. Now that I just bought an iMac I wanted to transfer all the iWeb over to the iMac and make it the main machine. I was doing all the transfer work manually rather than using the migration assistant or time machine.
I have copied the domain file in the iWeb directory over to the iMac. iWeb starts and displays all the pages and sites normally, but when I try to publish I get the " Publish Error. An unknown error occurred" message.
On the MBP everything was/is working normally.
I have tried to copy the same file again, no change. I have deleted the preference file, no change.
I have tried publishing to a local folder, and get the same error message.
Does anybody have an idea how to get this fixed? I browsed through the discussions here but couldn't find anything regarding this specific issue.
cheers
grani

Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Try the following:
1 - delete the iWeb preference file, com.apple.iWeb.plist, that resides in your User/Library/Preferences folder.
2 - go to your User/Library/Caches/com.apple.iWeb folder and delete the contents.
3 - reboot.
4 - launch iWeb and try to publish.
If that doesn't help continue:
5 - move the domain file from your User/Library/Application Support/iWeb folder to the Desktop.
6 - launch iWeb, create a new test site and save.
7 - go to the your User/Library/Application Support/iWeb folder and delete the new domain file.
8 - move your original domain file from the Desktop to the iWeb folder.
9 - launch iWeb and try again.
OT

Multi-Mapping Error after copying into new namespace

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for