Multiple composite primary key in Master Table

Dears ,
I am try to find any solution about Multiple composite primary key by search in forum , but i didn't success ... i am try to built master detail , the master structure table built with multiple composite primary key , i know that apex 4.2 still support tow primary key , in detail table i solved the problem by depend on rowid , and now i can use multiple composite primary key in detail table , the problem with master table because it's support only tow primary key , there are any solution by manual process or any something else ?
Thanks
Abo Yahya

Hi,
I've never done this so all I can do is give some suggestions. It takes more effort because you are going beyond what APEX currently supports. That said, you might try searching the forum with this search string:
key AND table AND instead
Make sure the ANDs are capitailized in the search criteria. Also, look at this thread {thread:id=395870} and the forum thread asociated with this message {message:id=10542916}.
Best wishes,
Howard

Similar Messages

How to define Composite primary key for a Table

Hi ,
I am basically more into Java Programming , with little bit knowledge on Oracle as DataBase .so please excuse for my silly doubts .
Can anybody please tell me how to define a Composite Primary Key on a Table .
Thanks in advance .
Edited by: user672373773 on Sep 25, 2009 8:54 AM

Here is an example right out of the Oracle documentation and the syntax for adding PK since you mention adding a composite PK.
Example creating composite index
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14251/adfns_indexing.htm#sthref594
Syntax for adding a PK (composite or not)
alter table oooooooo.tttttttt
add constraint tttttttt_PK
primary key (sample_column2,
sample_column1)
using index
tablespace IDXSPC
pctfree 05
initrans 04
maxtrans 08
storage (initial 16k
next 16k
maxextents 32
pctincrease 0);
-- dictionary management with restricted storage, change as desired.
HTH -- Mark D Powell --

Composite primary key in oe_order_headers_all table?

Hi all
What are columns involved in composite primary key in oe_order_headers_all table? how to identify that?
(Order_number, order_type, org_id) are the combination of composite primary key or anything else ?

select * From all_constraints where table_name = 'OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL'
SELECT AIC.* FROM ALL_INDEXES AI, ALL_IND_COLUMNS AIC
WHERE AI.TABLE_NAME='OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL'
AND AI.UNIQUENESS='UNIQUE'
AND AI.INDEX_NAME = AIC.INDEX_NAME
order by AI.INDEX_NAME
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

Primary Key Materlized View and primary key in master tables

We are using Oracle 11g2 and I created a materlized view on several master tables. The master tables all have primary key, but I did not include all primary key columns in the defining query.
According to Oracle Manual e10592 Specify WITH PRIMARY KEY to create a primary key materialized view. This is the default ....
The master table must contain an enabled primary key constraint, and the defining query of the materialized view
must specify all of the primary key columns directly.My MV created OK and works. My question is what can be the impact on my MV? Could it hit the performance. It takes 40 minutes for the MV to be created and 5 minutes to refresh for single row insert in each mater table. I would like to see it refresh in seconds.

Retrieving rows from the mview is purely a function of the number of rows and indexing on the mview itself. Refreshing the mview wall time depends on the quality of the query used to refresh the mview. Whether you include PKs from the source table in the mview is of little, or no, consequence here. What matters is the execution path of the refresh query. Is there proper indexing on the underlying tables to support the joins. Did you use mlog$_s to enable fast refresh - are mlog$_s even usable for your mview. There are a number of possible causes to your problem and we do not have enough information to make an estimate of the problem.
BTW, if the mview could refresh in seconds w/o mlog$_s, you probably do not need an mview.

Urgent - ESB: DB Adapter with composite primary keys no returning any data

I have a DB Adapter in the ESB that inserts/updates/selects data to/from a table with 2 columns as primary keys, but table has several columns.
1. Initially, the db table had constraints for the composite primary key, The DB adapter had valid data coming in, but no result data.
2. Then I removed the db constraints on the composite primary key, and selected the 2 columns in the DB adapter wizard. Still, valid data is going in, since I am outputing to a file prior to call this node, but no result data is appearing. The result XML is empty.
Do I need to do something in Toplink for this?
The table spec is below. the ACCT_FIELD and ACCT_CODE columns make up the composite primary key.
CREATE TABLE AFF_DATA_SYNC
ACCT_FIELD NUMBER NOT NULL,
ACCT_CODE VARCHAR2(16) NOT NULL,
ACCT_EXISTS_FLAG VARCHAR2(1),
SAVE_ACCT_SEG_XML CLOB,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE DATE
The following xml is the request to the DB adapter:
<top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCodeInputParameters xmlns:top="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter">
<top:accountField>8</top:accountField>
<top:accountCode>0003888</top:accountCode>
</top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCodeInputParameters>
Log output:
JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCode(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCode_inparameters,Af
DataSyncWipCollection) ] - No XMLRecord headers provided
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Executing query with arguments [8, 0003917]
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.TopLinkLogger log> SELECT ACCT_FIELD, ACCT_CODE, ACCT_EXISTS_FLAG, SAVE_ACCT_SEG_XML, LAST_UPDATE_DATE FROM
AFF_DATA_SYNC_WIP WHERE ((ACCT_FIELD = ?) AND (ACCT_CODE = ?))
bind => [8, 0003888]
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Read the following objects: []
Message was edited by:
user589357
Message was edited by:
user589357
Message was edited by:
user589357
Message was edited by:
user589357

The Toplink has no errors. Now I changed my table with only a single primary key, but for some reason, I am still getting no data.
JDeveloper 10.1.3.3 / SOA Suite (only using ESB) 10.1.3.3 with Oracle DB 10g 10.2.0.3.
1. What does No XMLRecord headers found mean?
2. Notice the last log item; Read ... []
Here are the log contents:
Invoking next service "AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId" with payload :
<top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordIdInputParameters xmlns:top="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter">
<top:recordId>80003888</top:recordId>
</top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordIdInputParameters>
JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId_inparameters,AffDataSyncWipCollection)
] - No XMLRecord headers provided
JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId_inparameters,AffDataSyncWipCollection)
] - Starting JCA LocalTransaction
JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId_inparameters,AffDataSyncWipCollection)
] - Invoking JCA Outbound Interaction
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> executing the NamedQuery: AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.AffDataSyncWip.AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Parsing header record element.
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.TopLinkLogger log> client acquired
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Executing query with arguments [80003888]
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.TopLinkLogger log> SELECT RECORD_ID, ACCT_FIELD, ACCT_CODE, ACCT_EXISTS_FLAG, SAVE_ACCT_SEG_XML, LAST_UPDATE_DATE
FROM AFF_DATA_SYNC_WIP WHERE (RECORD_ID = ?)
bind => [80003888]
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Read the following objects: []
Message was edited by:
user589357
Message was edited by:
user589357

Creation of CMP bean for a Composite Primary key????

Hi
i am having a composite primary keys in one of my table in the database.
I am trying to create a new entity bean for this table but i don't know how to create one in case when there is a composite primary key for a table.
Can anybody let me know is it possible to do it.
what is the procedure to be followed for the creation of the Entity bean in case of a composite primary key.
I am using MySql as the database .Creating CMP type of Entity bean.
Any help in this regard will be greatly useful to me as this is very urgent.
Thanks & Regards
Vikram K

Hi Nikola,
There are several problems with your CMP bean.
1. Fields of a Primary Key Class must be a subset of CMP fields, so yes, they must be either a primitive or a Serializable type.
2. Sun Application Server does not support Primary Key fields of an arbitrary Serializable type (i.e. those that will be stored
as BLOB in the database), but only primitives, Java wrappers, String, and Date/Time types.
Do you try to use stubs instead of relationships or for some other reason?
If it's the former - look at the CMR fields.
If it's the latter, I suggest to store these fields as regular CMP fields and use some other value as the PK. If you prefer that
the CMP container generates the PK values, use the Unknown
PrimaryKey feature.
Regards,
-marina

Composite Primary Key question

I have a new question regarding composite primary keys on another table I have created.
I have the following table with the following definition:
CREATE TABLE "APSOM"."CPULIST"
( "CPU_ID" VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
"SERVER_ID" VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
"CREATED_DATETIME" TIMESTAMP (6),
"UPDATED_DATETIME" TIMESTAMP (6)
with the following composite PK definition:
ALTER TABLE "APSOM"."CPULIST" ADD CONSTRAINT "CPULIST_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("CPU_ID", "SERVER_ID")
Then, I inserted data in the following way:
insert into CPULIST
values ('CPU1', 'P1', SYSDATE, SYSDATE);
with following CPU ID values from 'CPU1' to 'CPU16' for SERVER ID value 'P1' also inserted as well.
Now, I am trying to insert values for SERVER ID value 'P2'
insert into CPULIST
values ('CPU1', 'P2', SYSDATE, SYSDATE);
and I am getting the following error message:
Error starting at line 1 in command:
insert into CPULIST
values ('CPU1', 'P2', SYSDATE, SYSDATE)
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00001: unique constraint (APSOM.XPKCPULIST) violated
00001. 00000 - "unique constraint (%s.%s) violated"
*Cause: An UPDATE or INSERT statement attempted to insert a duplicate key.
For Trusted Oracle configured in DBMS MAC mode, you may see
this message if a duplicate entry exists at a different level.
*Action: Either remove the unique restriction or do not insert the key.
Using the following SQL command:
select column_name from all_cons_columns
where constraint_name = 'CPULIST_PK'
and owner = 'APSOM';
I get the following records
1. CPU_ID
2. SERVER_ID
This error does not make sense to me. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Patrick Quinn
Operations
Turning Point Global Solutions

So, if there is a hidden unique constraint XPKCPULIST that cannot be pulled the all_cons_column table and I drop the XPXCPULIST constraint with the following SQL:
alter table CPULIST drop constraint XPKCPULIST;
Error starting at line 1 in command:
alter table CPULIST drop constraint XPKCPULIST
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-02443: Cannot drop constraint - nonexistent constraint
02443. 00000 - "Cannot drop constraint - nonexistent constraint"
*Cause:    alter table drop constraint <constraint_name>
*Action:   make sure you supply correct constraint name.
What can I do to get past this so I can perform the following insert and receive this error message??
insert into CPULIST
values ('CPU1', 'P2', SYSTIMESTAMP, SYSTIMESTAMP);
Error starting at line 1 in command:
insert into CPULIST
values ('CPU1', 'P2', SYSTIMESTAMP, SYSTIMESTAMP)
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00001: unique constraint (APSOM.XPKCPULIST) violated
00001. 00000 - "unique constraint (%s.%s) violated"
*Cause:    An UPDATE or INSERT statement attempted to insert a duplicate key.
For Trusted Oracle configured in DBMS MAC mode, you may see
this message if a duplicate entry exists at a different level.
*Action:   Either remove the unique restriction or do not insert the key.

Can I add a new column to a composite primary key without dropping it?

Hi
I need to modify the composite primary key of a table so as to include an another additional column to it?
Can I do that without dropping the PRIMARY KEY constraint on the table?

user13410062 wrote:
Hi
I need to modify the composite primary key of a table so as to include an another additional column to it?
Can I do that without dropping the PRIMARY KEY constraint on the table?post results from ALTER TABLE command

Master Detail Forms with 2 composite primary keys - Is there a workaround?

Hello All,
I have been searching for a workaround to the maximum 2 part primary key restriction on the multi-row updates, and master-detail forms, and am hoping that someone can help me. I am using HTMLDB v2.0.0.00.49 with IE 6 against a 9.2 DB.
I successfully implemented the workaround of Fred Stoopendaal's (see Updata PK on HTML DB ) and it works fine for single page multi-record updateable forms, but alas I haven't been able to extend it to master detail forms (I think it is something to do with Oracle not allowing the "returning" clause on views).
Here is what I tried:
two tables, one with a 2 part composite primary key, which is the master table, and a detail table with 3 part composite primary key -
--------- BEGIN SQL ---------
create table master_table
( master_col1 number
, master_col2 number
, master_col3 varchar2(30)
, constraint master_pk primary key (master_col1,master_col2));
create table detail_table
(detail_col1 number
,detail_col2 number
,detail_col3 number
,detail_col4 varchar2(30)
, constraint detail_pk primary key(detail_col1,detail_col2,detail_col3)
, constraint master_detail_fk foreign key (detail_col1,detail_col2) references master_table(master_col1,master_col2));
create or replace view v_master_table as
select rowid mata_rowid,mata.*
from master_table mata;
create or replace view v_detail_table as
select rowid deta_rowid,
(select rowid from master_table mata where mata.master_col1 = deta.detail_col1 and mata.master_col2 = deta.detail_col2) deta_mata_rowid
, deta.*
from detail_table deta;
create or replace trigger mata_ins_upd_trg
instead of insert or update on v_master_table
referencing new as new old as old
for each row
begin
if inserting then
insert into master_table (master_col1, master_col2, master_col3)
values (:new.master_col1, :new.master_col2, :new.master_col3);
end if;
if updating then
update master_table
set master_col1 = :new.master_col1,
master_col2 = :new.master_col2,
master_col3 = :new.master_col3
where rowid = :old.mata_rowid;
end if;
end;
create or replace trigger deta_ins_upd_trg
instead of insert or update on v_detail_table
referencing new as new old as old
for each row
begin
if inserting then
insert into detail_table ( detail_col1, detail_col2, detail_col3, detail_col4)
values (:new.detail_col1, :new.detail_col2, :new.detail_col3, :new.detail_col4);
end if;
if updating then
update detail_table
set detail_col1 = :new.detail_col1,
detail_col2 = :new.detail_col2,
detail_col3 = :new.detail_col3,
detail_col4 = :new.detail_col4
where rowid = :old.deta_rowid;
end if;
end;
--------- END SQL ---------
Then I created a master-detail form in Apex on the two views, using the mata_rowid and deta_rowid as primary keys, and mata_rowid=deta_mata_rowid as the link. I realise that using a function to fetch the master rowid within the detail view query is costly, but it was my intention to modify the record fetch queries to use the real FK columns once things were up and running.
It seems to generate the pages ok, and I can insert/update master table records, but as soon as I modify records in the detail table things go a bit haywire. I can't find any documentation on how the inbuilt MRU/MRD logic works, so can't figure out the issue.
Can anyone out there tell me what the problem is with the logic above, or if they have come up with a neat solution to this annoying limitation. I know that many will say that I should modify the data model to use surrogate primary keys, but many of the uses for HTMLDB are new interfaces for old schemas, so a workaround that doesn't involve wholesale data model changes would be preferable.
Thanks in advance,
Mike Cretan

Hi, this is likely not the most elegant way...but perhaps the simplest -- and I didn't have much time to play.
I used Wizard to create two separate Master Detail forms, each with a separate detail table. Thus I ended up with four pages:
Page "A" - "Selector" page for Master (Report), with Edit link driving to Detail-1
Page "B" - Editable Master/Detail-1 page (HTML / Report)
Page "C" - "Selector" page for Master (Report), with Edit link driving to Detail-2
Page "D" - Editable Master/Detail-2 page (HTML / Report)
Then I selected the primary key column TWICE on the Report on Page A. Modified the second instance of this column to navigate to Page D (passing primary key) exactly the way the original instance of this column navigates to Page B. Then I deleted Page C.
Since you can have only one Tabular Entry form per page, this seemed the best way to drive two separate detail tables from a common interface.

Update enrolled table which has 6 composite primary key

Hi Everyone,
I am trying to update a grade column in table called enrolled which has 6 composite primary key column including SID, TERMYEAR, FACCODE, DEPCODE, COURSENO, SECNO and 2 extra column including GRADE, IDD all of them are of type VARCHAR2 as describe below:
To update this table I used the command below:
UPDATE enrolled
SET grade = :COURSE_BLOCK.GRADE_TEXT
WHERE IID = :GLOBAL.logUserid
AND SID = :COURSE_BLOCK.SID_TEXT
AND FACCODE = :COURSE_BLOCK.FACULTY_TEXT
AND DEPCODE = :COURSE_BLOCK.DEPARTMENT_TEXT
AND COURSENO = :COURSE_BLOCK.COURSE_TEXT
AND SECNO = :COURSE_BLOCK.SECTION_TEXT;
Note: the :GLOBAL.logUserid is a global variable that I assigned the user id when the user log on to the application.
When I run the application and fill out the form in order to update the table this doesn't update the table and if I use SQL*PLUS as well with the values that I use for the form to update the table I get message: o rows updated
Can Someone help please?

Here is the solution.
The problem:
The problem was that the enrolled table was designed in a way that a student can enrolled in the lecture(LEC type column) and Laboratory(LAB type column). When a student is given a grade, it is given a grade for the course 100 (eg: 03-60-100) this course has a lecture and lab. this course belong to the faculty code 03(science) department 60 (computer Science) so when a student register to a course, will register to a lecture and a lab but he will receive a grade for the course 100 lec in this case Oracle couldn't update the table because there was two column with course 100 for that particular student Id
The solution:
There are many solution I believe but my quickest solution is when a student register to the course by default is given a grade 'I' means Incomplete then when the instructor add the grade, he can just update a grade from incomplete to the final grade (eg A) now the code will be to get only the course 100 that has grade and discard that doesn't have grade this means that I need only to make sure that the WHERE Clause grade is not null shown below.
UPDATE enrolled
SET grade = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME
WHERE grade IS NOY NULL
AND IID = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD
AND faccode = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD
AND depcode = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD
AND courseno= BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME
NAD secno = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME
AND SID = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME

Composite primary key on very large tables...

Hello
So I'm building a database where one of the tables will eventually have > 1 billion rows and was wondering about the primary key. The table will have 3 columns (sample_id, object_id, value) and so I was thinking instead of creating a surrogate key I would create a composite primary key on those 3 columns.... People will query either for sample_id = X or object_id = Y. I've created a composite index on object_id, sample_id and value and the query times have been fast < 2-3s per object_id. Although building that index takes some time (7-8 hrs) what would be the pros/cons to composite PK vs a unique index? I plan to do massive bulk uploads (50M records at a time) so I'll disable the constraints before loading.... These records will also be loaded in order so would a clustered table be appropriate?
thanks
steve

Hi,
As correctly said by steve,partition the table.
Create a unique index on single column and then even if ur query is not using that column which has index,use a HINT and make it to use the index.
If ur using joins on this table with other tables u can use use_hash hint which will improve performance.
Hope it helps.
Thanks

Reconciling composite primary key tables in 9.0.1.4 DB app connector

Hi
I am trying to get the reconciliation in the 9.0.1.4 db app connector to work on a view that has a composite primary key (one user_id field and one group_id field)
There are no examples on how to do this and my "trial-and-error" efforts have not been fruitful this far. Anyone that has any experience of how to solve this problem?
Best regards
/Martin

Hi Martin, our customer is also very sensitive to changes in his HR system, it is a custom oracle development. He provide us a read only view every day with all changes on their identities. We have developed a custom pl/sql proccess to fill a custom local table with the right information . Then we use this table locally with dbtable connector but with some custom addons.
So i believe that using a second table and keep in synch it is the best approach.
We have detect some problem with 9.0.1.4 DB app connector, it is using internally only one db connection for all its operations, in a huge load condition its can produce errors and race condition problems. We have a custom connector now and it is using connection pool from application server so we will have not this problem.
I believe that oracle should release source for their connectors, i am very sure that partners and customers can improve it.

How to Alter any table to make some fields Composite Primary Key

I need to Alter Table to make some fields Composite Primary Key.
Is it possible to do this ?
Please give any example.
Regards,
AgrawalV

Agrawal
If you are looking for an example to create a composite primary key, here you are.
sql> Alter Table myTable add constraint pk_myTable primary key(col1, col2, ...coln) ;
where
pk_myTable is the name of the primary key constraint,
myTable is the name of the table that you want to create a constraint on and
col1...coln are the column names in the table <myTable)

REFRENCEING PRIMARY KEY IN THE TABLE

Hi,
I want to refer the composite primary key column into one table that is i have one primary key with three columns and i want to refer only one column as a forigen key in the other table.
how do i do that ?
regards
gaurav
null

Foreign keys have to map to primary keys. If your master table requires three columns to uniquely identify a record then its children must have those three columns as well. This can lead to the apparently absurd situation where you have tables whose keys consist of more columns than the actual table data.
The alternative is to use an artificial ID column as the PK and make the other columns an unique key. The problem with synthetic primary keys is that it makes it difficult to identify children or grandchildren: you always have to join with the parent table or denormalise your data.
Example: ORDERS identified by Ord_No
ORDER_ITEMS identified by ord_itm_no
Natural key: ORDERS PK = order_no
ORDER_ITEMS PK = order_no
, ord_itm_no
Here it is easy enough to find which items belong to Order 1234 just by querying ORDER_ITEMS table.
Synthetic key: ORDERS PK = id
UK = order_no
ORDER_ITEMS PK = ORDERS.id, id
UK = order_no, ord_itm_no
Here to find which items belong to Order 1234 you have to query ORDERS to find the ID before querying ORDER_ITEMS table. You have to have triggers on the ORDER_ITEMS table to populate the denormalised columns order_no and ord_item_no.
Which approach you take ought to depend upon your database and what you do with it but it take on the flavour of a religious war. The orthodox view (the word of Codd) firmly supports using natural keys.
ciao, APC

Composite primary key and InputSelect

Hi
I have a jsp page where I have an InputSelect list that display the on of the field of a composite primary key.
What I what is to pass the second field of the primary key to my submit page without letting the user see that field.
<tr>
<td>Projekt</td>
<td>
<jbo:InputSelect multiple="false"
datasource="ds"
dataitem="ProjektId"
displaydatasource="proid"
displaydataitem="ProjektId"
displayvaluedataitem="ProjektId" />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>
<jbo:InputHidden datasource="ds"
dataitem="Kundenr" ></jbo:InputHidden>
</td>
</tr>
How can I automaticly give this hidden field it's value.
With kind regards Arnar Dagsson

How to implement this?
A has one to many relation ship with B
TABLE A
key A1 (primary key)
data A2
data A3
fkey B2 --> @OneToManyShouldn't this be (it is composite):
TABLE A
key A1 (primary key)
data A2
data A3
fkey B1 --> @OneToMany
fkey B2 --> @OneToMany
>
TABLE B
key B1 (primary)
key B2 (primary) <--- @ManyToOne
data B3
Tried to use @OneToMany and @ManyToOne but complains
about
@JoinColumns etc. Is this possible at all?If you can avoid having composite primary keys
Take a look at this message for my answer
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=764754&messageID=4366595#4366595
Hope it helps

Multiple composite primary key in Master Table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for