Reconciling composite primary key tables in 9.0.1.4 DB app connector

Hi
I am trying to get the reconciliation in the 9.0.1.4 db app connector to work on a view that has a composite primary key (one user_id field and one group_id field)
There are no examples on how to do this and my "trial-and-error" efforts have not been fruitful this far. Anyone that has any experience of how to solve this problem?
Best regards
/Martin

Hi Martin, our customer is also very sensitive to changes in his HR system, it is a custom oracle development. He provide us a read only view every day with all changes on their identities. We have developed a custom pl/sql proccess to fill a custom local table with the right information . Then we use this table locally with dbtable connector but with some custom addons.
So i believe that using a second table and keep in synch it is the best approach.
We have detect some problem with 9.0.1.4 DB app connector, it is using internally only one db connection for all its operations, in a huge load condition its can produce errors and race condition problems. We have a custom connector now and it is using connection pool from application server so we will have not this problem.
I believe that oracle should release source for their connectors, i am very sure that partners and customers can improve it.

Similar Messages

How to define Composite primary key for a Table

Hi ,
I am basically more into Java Programming , with little bit knowledge on Oracle as DataBase .so please excuse for my silly doubts .
Can anybody please tell me how to define a Composite Primary Key on a Table .
Thanks in advance .
Edited by: user672373773 on Sep 25, 2009 8:54 AM

Here is an example right out of the Oracle documentation and the syntax for adding PK since you mention adding a composite PK.
Example creating composite index
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14251/adfns_indexing.htm#sthref594
Syntax for adding a PK (composite or not)
alter table oooooooo.tttttttt
add constraint tttttttt_PK
primary key (sample_column2,
sample_column1)
using index
tablespace IDXSPC
pctfree 05
initrans 04
maxtrans 08
storage (initial 16k
next 16k
maxextents 32
pctincrease 0);
-- dictionary management with restricted storage, change as desired.
HTH -- Mark D Powell --

Multiple composite primary key in Master Table

Dears ,
I am try to find any solution about Multiple composite primary key by search in forum , but i didn't success ... i am try to built master detail , the master structure table built with multiple composite primary key , i know that apex 4.2 still support tow primary key , in detail table i solved the problem by depend on rowid , and now i can use multiple composite primary key in detail table , the problem with master table because it's support only tow primary key , there are any solution by manual process or any something else ?
Thanks
Abo Yahya

Hi,
I've never done this so all I can do is give some suggestions. It takes more effort because you are going beyond what APEX currently supports. That said, you might try searching the forum with this search string:
key AND table AND instead
Make sure the ANDs are capitailized in the search criteria. Also, look at this thread {thread:id=395870} and the forum thread asociated with this message {message:id=10542916}.
Best wishes,
Howard

Composite primary key in oe_order_headers_all table?

Hi all
What are columns involved in composite primary key in oe_order_headers_all table? how to identify that?
(Order_number, order_type, org_id) are the combination of composite primary key or anything else ?

select * From all_constraints where table_name = 'OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL'
SELECT AIC.* FROM ALL_INDEXES AI, ALL_IND_COLUMNS AIC
WHERE AI.TABLE_NAME='OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL'
AND AI.UNIQUENESS='UNIQUE'
AND AI.INDEX_NAME = AIC.INDEX_NAME
order by AI.INDEX_NAME
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

Update enrolled table which has 6 composite primary key

Hi Everyone,
I am trying to update a grade column in table called enrolled which has 6 composite primary key column including SID, TERMYEAR, FACCODE, DEPCODE, COURSENO, SECNO and 2 extra column including GRADE, IDD all of them are of type VARCHAR2 as describe below:
To update this table I used the command below:
UPDATE enrolled
SET grade = :COURSE_BLOCK.GRADE_TEXT
WHERE IID = :GLOBAL.logUserid
AND SID = :COURSE_BLOCK.SID_TEXT
AND FACCODE = :COURSE_BLOCK.FACULTY_TEXT
AND DEPCODE = :COURSE_BLOCK.DEPARTMENT_TEXT
AND COURSENO = :COURSE_BLOCK.COURSE_TEXT
AND SECNO = :COURSE_BLOCK.SECTION_TEXT;
Note: the :GLOBAL.logUserid is a global variable that I assigned the user id when the user log on to the application.
When I run the application and fill out the form in order to update the table this doesn't update the table and if I use SQL*PLUS as well with the values that I use for the form to update the table I get message: o rows updated
Can Someone help please?

Here is the solution.
The problem:
The problem was that the enrolled table was designed in a way that a student can enrolled in the lecture(LEC type column) and Laboratory(LAB type column). When a student is given a grade, it is given a grade for the course 100 (eg: 03-60-100) this course has a lecture and lab. this course belong to the faculty code 03(science) department 60 (computer Science) so when a student register to a course, will register to a lecture and a lab but he will receive a grade for the course 100 lec in this case Oracle couldn't update the table because there was two column with course 100 for that particular student Id
The solution:
There are many solution I believe but my quickest solution is when a student register to the course by default is given a grade 'I' means Incomplete then when the instructor add the grade, he can just update a grade from incomplete to the final grade (eg A) now the code will be to get only the course 100 that has grade and discard that doesn't have grade this means that I need only to make sure that the WHERE Clause grade is not null shown below.
UPDATE enrolled
SET grade = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME
WHERE grade IS NOY NULL
AND IID = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD
AND faccode = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD
AND depcode = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD
AND courseno= BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME
NAD secno = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME
AND SID = BLOCK_NAME.FIELD_NAME

Composite primary key on very large tables...

Hello
So I'm building a database where one of the tables will eventually have > 1 billion rows and was wondering about the primary key. The table will have 3 columns (sample_id, object_id, value) and so I was thinking instead of creating a surrogate key I would create a composite primary key on those 3 columns.... People will query either for sample_id = X or object_id = Y. I've created a composite index on object_id, sample_id and value and the query times have been fast < 2-3s per object_id. Although building that index takes some time (7-8 hrs) what would be the pros/cons to composite PK vs a unique index? I plan to do massive bulk uploads (50M records at a time) so I'll disable the constraints before loading.... These records will also be loaded in order so would a clustered table be appropriate?
thanks
steve

Hi,
As correctly said by steve,partition the table.
Create a unique index on single column and then even if ur query is not using that column which has index,use a HINT and make it to use the index.
If ur using joins on this table with other tables u can use use_hash hint which will improve performance.
Hope it helps.
Thanks

How to Alter any table to make some fields Composite Primary Key

I need to Alter Table to make some fields Composite Primary Key.
Is it possible to do this ?
Please give any example.
Regards,
AgrawalV

Agrawal
If you are looking for an example to create a composite primary key, here you are.
sql> Alter Table myTable add constraint pk_myTable primary key(col1, col2, ...coln) ;
where
pk_myTable is the name of the primary key constraint,
myTable is the name of the table that you want to create a constraint on and
col1...coln are the column names in the table <myTable)

Error While Deploying A CMP Entity Bean With A Composite Primary Key

Hello all,
I have a problem deploying CMP Entity beans with composite primary keys. I have a CMP Entity Bean, which contains a composite primary key composed of two local stubs. If you know more about this please respond to my post on the EJB forum (subject: CMP Bean Local Stub as a Field of a Primary Key Class).
In the mean time, can you please tell me what following error message means and how to resolve it? From what I understand it might be a problem with Sun ONE AS 7, but I would like to make sure it's not me doing something wrong.
[05/Jan/2005:12:49:03] WARNING ( 1896):      Validation error in bean CustomerSubscription: The type of non-static field customer of the key class
test.subscription.CustomerSubscriptionCMP_1530383317_JDOState$Oid must be primitive or must implement java.io.Serializable.
     Update the type of the key class field.
     Warning: All primary key columns in primary table CustomerSubscription of the bean corresponding to the generated class test.subscription.CustomerSubscriptionCMP_1530383317_JDOState must be mapped to key fields.
     Map the following primary key columns to key fields: CustomerSubscription.CustomerEmail,CustomerSubscription.SubscriptionType. If you already have fields mapped to these columns, verify that they are key fields.Is it enough that a primary key class be serializable or all fields have to implement Serializable or be a primitive?
Please let me know if you need more information to answer my question.
Thanks.
Nikola

Hi Nikola,
There are several problems with your CMP bean.
1. Fields of a Primary Key Class must be a subset of CMP fields, so yes, they must be either a primitive or a Serializable type.
2. Sun Application Server does not support Primary Key fields of an arbitrary Serializable type (i.e. those that will be stored
as BLOB in the database), but only primitives, Java wrappers, String, and Date/Time types.
Do you try to use stubs instead of relationships or for some other reason?
If it's the former - look at the CMR fields.
If it's the latter, I suggest to store these fields as regular CMP fields and use some other value as the PK. If you prefer that
the CMP container generates the PK values, use the Unknown
PrimaryKey feature.
Regards,
-marina

HOW TO GET COUNT IN OF COMPOSITE PRIMARY KEYS USING ECLIPSELINK

Hi all,
We are currently migrating our application form oracle 10g to 11 g and hence migrating from toplink to eclipselink.
we are unable to fire the count query and getting the following exception ...
Error Code: 909
Call: SELECT COUNT() FROM T_USER_MESSAGE t0, T_USER t2, T_MESSAGE_RECIPIENT t1 WHERE ((((t2.PERSISTENT_ID = ?) AND (t2.SITE_CODE = ?)) AND (t1.DELETED_BY_RECIPIENT = ?)) AND (((t2.PERSISTENT_ID = t1.RECIPIENT_ID) AND (t2.SITE_CODE = t1.RECIPIENT_SITE)) AND ((t0.PERSISTENT_ID = t1.MESSAGE_ID) AND (t0.SITE_CODE = t1.MESSAGE_SITE))))
bind => [13398610, 1, F]
please advise .
we suspect that this could be because of the composite primary key in one of the tables .
any pointers to specify how count(*) could be used in this scenario would be of great help ..
Thanks in advance

What is the query being used, include the JPQL/expression code.
What is the error message (I assume this is a database error?).
What version are you using, can you try the latest EclipseLink 2.1 release.
James : http://www.eclipselink.org

Null in Composite Primary Key and "Primary keys must not contain null"

Hello all.
I'm a newbie concerning to JPA/EJB3, but I was wondering if toplinks doesn't support composite primary keys with null in some field (something perfectly right in any RDBMS).
I used JDeveloper (I'm using Oracle 10g database and JDeveloper 10.1.3.2.) wizards to generate JPA classes and I checked out generated files (with annotations), so they should be right (by the way, other O-R mappings for my model are working right, but this one).
I'm getting the next error:
Exception Description: The primary key read from the row [DatabaseRecord(
     TSUBGRUPOSLDI.CD_GRUP => 01
     TSUBGRUPOSLDI.CD_SUBGRUP => null
     TSUBGRUPOSLDI.CG_POBL => 058
     TSUBGRUPOSLDI.CG_PROV => 28
     TSUBGRUPOSLDI.DSCR => Sanidad)] during the execution of the query was detected to be null. Primary keys must not contain null.
Compound primary key is (CD_GRUP, CD_SUBGRUP). No foreign keys, no joins (only a NamedQuery: "select o from ..."). It's the simplest case!
I checked out that everything runs ok if there's no "null" value in CD_SUBGRUP.
After some research (this and other forums) I'm beginning to believe that it's not supported, but not sure.
Am I doing sth wrong? If not, what is the reason to not support this? Will it be supported in the future?
Thanks in advance.

Null is a special value and in many databases is not comparable to another null value (hence the isNull operator) and may pose problems when used to uniquely identify an Entity. TopLink does not support null values within a composite PK. As the nullable column is most likely not designated as a PK within your database table (many databases do not allow this) I recommend updating the Entity PKs to match that of the database.
--Gordon

In which case composite primary key allows NULL values in it

Hi to all
In what case composite primary key allows nulls in it.
Let us suppose, I created a composite primary key with 2 attributes.
CREATE TABLE sample
BNK_Id NUMBER(6),
BNK_Name VARCHAR2(20),
CONSTRAINT BNK_Id_Name_PK PRIMARY KEY(BNK_Id,BNK_Name)
When it allows null values in it.
thanks in advance

Are you sure that your instructor was not talking about unique keys? As Solomon said, a primary key always implies not null on all of the columns of the PK. However a unique key does not automatically imply not null, and can have nulls in a column as long as the values in the populated columns are unique.
SQL> create table test (
2     id number,
3     pid number,
4     descr varchar2(10));
Table created.
SQL> alter table test add constraint test_unq
2     unique (id, pid);
Table altered.
SQL> insert into test values (1, null, 'desc1');
1 row created.
SQL> insert into test values (2, null, 'desc2');
1 row created.
SQL> insert into test values (2, null, 'fail1');
insert into test values (2, null, 'fail1')
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00001: unique constraint (OPS$ORACLE.TEST_UNQ) violatedJohn

Null value in Composite Primary key

Hi,
I have a requirement where I need to identify each record based on 4 columns. I though that I could achieve the same by imposing a composite primary key based on all the 4 columns. But any one of the column can be null at anytime. Can I still impose a composite primary key? i.e., if I create a composite primary key based on 4 columns, can any one of the column be null?
Your help would be more appreciated.

No, you can't
By definition a Primary Key is NOT NULL
SQL> drop table t
2 /
Table dropped.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
SQL>
SQL> create table t
2 (col1 number null
3 ,col2 number null
4 ,col3 number null
5 ,col4 number null
6 ,constraint tpk primary key (col1, col2, col3, col4)
7 )
8 /
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
SQL>
SQL> desc t
Name                                                              Null?    Type
COL1                                                              NOT NULL NUMBER
COL2                                                              NOT NULL NUMBER
COL3                                                              NOT NULL NUMBER
COL4                                                              NOT NULL NUMBER
SQL>

Master Detail Forms with 2 composite primary keys - Is there a workaround?

Hello All,
I have been searching for a workaround to the maximum 2 part primary key restriction on the multi-row updates, and master-detail forms, and am hoping that someone can help me. I am using HTMLDB v2.0.0.00.49 with IE 6 against a 9.2 DB.
I successfully implemented the workaround of Fred Stoopendaal's (see Updata PK on HTML DB ) and it works fine for single page multi-record updateable forms, but alas I haven't been able to extend it to master detail forms (I think it is something to do with Oracle not allowing the "returning" clause on views).
Here is what I tried:
two tables, one with a 2 part composite primary key, which is the master table, and a detail table with 3 part composite primary key -
--------- BEGIN SQL ---------
create table master_table
( master_col1 number
, master_col2 number
, master_col3 varchar2(30)
, constraint master_pk primary key (master_col1,master_col2));
create table detail_table
(detail_col1 number
,detail_col2 number
,detail_col3 number
,detail_col4 varchar2(30)
, constraint detail_pk primary key(detail_col1,detail_col2,detail_col3)
, constraint master_detail_fk foreign key (detail_col1,detail_col2) references master_table(master_col1,master_col2));
create or replace view v_master_table as
select rowid mata_rowid,mata.*
from master_table mata;
create or replace view v_detail_table as
select rowid deta_rowid,
(select rowid from master_table mata where mata.master_col1 = deta.detail_col1 and mata.master_col2 = deta.detail_col2) deta_mata_rowid
, deta.*
from detail_table deta;
create or replace trigger mata_ins_upd_trg
instead of insert or update on v_master_table
referencing new as new old as old
for each row
begin
if inserting then
insert into master_table (master_col1, master_col2, master_col3)
values (:new.master_col1, :new.master_col2, :new.master_col3);
end if;
if updating then
update master_table
set master_col1 = :new.master_col1,
master_col2 = :new.master_col2,
master_col3 = :new.master_col3
where rowid = :old.mata_rowid;
end if;
end;
create or replace trigger deta_ins_upd_trg
instead of insert or update on v_detail_table
referencing new as new old as old
for each row
begin
if inserting then
insert into detail_table ( detail_col1, detail_col2, detail_col3, detail_col4)
values (:new.detail_col1, :new.detail_col2, :new.detail_col3, :new.detail_col4);
end if;
if updating then
update detail_table
set detail_col1 = :new.detail_col1,
detail_col2 = :new.detail_col2,
detail_col3 = :new.detail_col3,
detail_col4 = :new.detail_col4
where rowid = :old.deta_rowid;
end if;
end;
--------- END SQL ---------
Then I created a master-detail form in Apex on the two views, using the mata_rowid and deta_rowid as primary keys, and mata_rowid=deta_mata_rowid as the link. I realise that using a function to fetch the master rowid within the detail view query is costly, but it was my intention to modify the record fetch queries to use the real FK columns once things were up and running.
It seems to generate the pages ok, and I can insert/update master table records, but as soon as I modify records in the detail table things go a bit haywire. I can't find any documentation on how the inbuilt MRU/MRD logic works, so can't figure out the issue.
Can anyone out there tell me what the problem is with the logic above, or if they have come up with a neat solution to this annoying limitation. I know that many will say that I should modify the data model to use surrogate primary keys, but many of the uses for HTMLDB are new interfaces for old schemas, so a workaround that doesn't involve wholesale data model changes would be preferable.
Thanks in advance,
Mike Cretan

Hi, this is likely not the most elegant way...but perhaps the simplest -- and I didn't have much time to play.
I used Wizard to create two separate Master Detail forms, each with a separate detail table. Thus I ended up with four pages:
Page "A" - "Selector" page for Master (Report), with Edit link driving to Detail-1
Page "B" - Editable Master/Detail-1 page (HTML / Report)
Page "C" - "Selector" page for Master (Report), with Edit link driving to Detail-2
Page "D" - Editable Master/Detail-2 page (HTML / Report)
Then I selected the primary key column TWICE on the Report on Page A. Modified the second instance of this column to navigate to Page D (passing primary key) exactly the way the original instance of this column navigates to Page B. Then I deleted Page C.
Since you can have only one Tabular Entry form per page, this seemed the best way to drive two separate detail tables from a common interface.

Urgent - ESB: DB Adapter with composite primary keys no returning any data

I have a DB Adapter in the ESB that inserts/updates/selects data to/from a table with 2 columns as primary keys, but table has several columns.
1. Initially, the db table had constraints for the composite primary key, The DB adapter had valid data coming in, but no result data.
2. Then I removed the db constraints on the composite primary key, and selected the 2 columns in the DB adapter wizard. Still, valid data is going in, since I am outputing to a file prior to call this node, but no result data is appearing. The result XML is empty.
Do I need to do something in Toplink for this?
The table spec is below. the ACCT_FIELD and ACCT_CODE columns make up the composite primary key.
CREATE TABLE AFF_DATA_SYNC
ACCT_FIELD NUMBER NOT NULL,
ACCT_CODE VARCHAR2(16) NOT NULL,
ACCT_EXISTS_FLAG VARCHAR2(1),
SAVE_ACCT_SEG_XML CLOB,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE DATE
The following xml is the request to the DB adapter:
<top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCodeInputParameters xmlns:top="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter">
<top:accountField>8</top:accountField>
<top:accountCode>0003888</top:accountCode>
</top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCodeInputParameters>
Log output:
JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCode(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_accountField_accountCode_inparameters,Af
DataSyncWipCollection) ] - No XMLRecord headers provided
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Executing query with arguments [8, 0003917]
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.TopLinkLogger log> SELECT ACCT_FIELD, ACCT_CODE, ACCT_EXISTS_FLAG, SAVE_ACCT_SEG_XML, LAST_UPDATE_DATE FROM
AFF_DATA_SYNC_WIP WHERE ((ACCT_FIELD = ?) AND (ACCT_CODE = ?))
bind => [8, 0003888]
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Read the following objects: []
Message was edited by:
user589357
Message was edited by:
user589357
Message was edited by:
user589357
Message was edited by:
user589357

The Toplink has no errors. Now I changed my table with only a single primary key, but for some reason, I am still getting no data.
JDeveloper 10.1.3.3 / SOA Suite (only using ESB) 10.1.3.3 with Oracle DB 10g 10.2.0.3.
1. What does No XMLRecord headers found mean?
2. Notice the last log item; Read ... []
Here are the log contents:
Invoking next service "AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId" with payload :
<top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordIdInputParameters xmlns:top="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter">
<top:recordId>80003888</top:recordId>
</top:AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordIdInputParameters>
JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId_inparameters,AffDataSyncWipCollection)
] - No XMLRecord headers provided
JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId_inparameters,AffDataSyncWipCollection)
] - Starting JCA LocalTransaction
JCA: esb:///ESB_Projects/STRIPES-AFF-Data-Intg_AFF-Data-Integration/AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.wsdl [ AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter_ptt::AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId(AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect_recordId_inparameters,AffDataSyncWipCollection)
] - Invoking JCA Outbound Interaction
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> executing the NamedQuery: AffDataSyncReadDBAdapter.AffDataSyncWip.AffDataSyncReadDBAdapterSelect
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Parsing header record element.
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.TopLinkLogger log> client acquired
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Executing query with arguments [80003888]
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.TopLinkLogger log> SELECT RECORD_ID, ACCT_FIELD, ACCT_CODE, ACCT_EXISTS_FLAG, SAVE_ACCT_SEG_XML, LAST_UPDATE_DATE
FROM AFF_DATA_SYNC_WIP WHERE (RECORD_ID = ?)
bind => [80003888]
JCA: <oracle.tip.adapter.db.DBInteraction executeOutboundRead> Read the following objects: []
Message was edited by:
user589357
Message was edited by:
user589357

Composite Primary Key

Hi,
I have few tables which had primary key on one column A, I made it composite primary key by adding one more column B at 2nd position. I made this change in all the tables. When I ran few SQLs to check the performance I found that explain plan shows full table scan on few tables which was not showing eariler (before composite PK). The SQL has outer join between these tables on column A (1st position in composite PK index). Is there anything I need to look into?
I'm using Oracle 10.2.0.5.0.
Thanks

Onkar Talekar wrote:
I guess you are talking about the same table in this thread: [url:https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=2372871&start=0&tstart=0]Primary Key modification
Yes. thats right.
If it is the same post, could you post current structure of the table plus what is recommended in the FAQ to post for performance issues?
Have you replaced your primary key from PARENT_ID to a composite primary key (PARENT_ID, PT_TIME)?
What was the reason for that?
Did you have any need to insert the same key (PARENT_ID) with different PT_TIME?
What is the benefit you expected creating this index?
What did you mean with "contention" that is happening on this primary key/index? Someone using the same primary key?
How is the PARENT_ID generated?
At a first look I did not see the need of replacing your primary key, as Tubby advised in your previous post. Adding a column to solve contention added additional trouble to you on performance side.
Regards.
Al.

Reconciling composite primary key tables in 9.0.1.4 DB app connector

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for