Multiple Content types only first 11 visible

We have set up Multiple content types (word templates) for our libraries.
But only the first eleven content types are shown when we click on new document.
I have searched the internet but cannot find a solution for this.
Is there a possibility to show all the content types ?
possible solution that I was thinking off but I can not seem to configure:
- changing the max number of content types that sharepoint displays from 11 to an higher value
- grouping some content types together and split them up this way
- creating an extra "new document" link with a dropdown with other content types
- enabling a scrollbar
The only possibility I see for the moment is to create multiple libraries each of them with a subset of the content types
but that is not really user friendly then they have to search in multiple libraries instead of 1

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that it displayed only the first eleven content types after you set up multiple content type in your libraries.
I have created lots of content types and added them to library and it worked fine.
Please check the configuration of the content type order in library settings -> Change new button order and default content type, and provide the screen shot about is.
Please add multiple content types you created to other libraries and other libraries in other site collections and test whether this issue occurs.
Best Regards,
Dean Wang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Similar Messages

Managed metadata columns in document information panel with multiple content types

Hi everyone,
The problem I have is that for custom content types not all managed metadata columns are displayed in Document Information Panel (DIP) for the document in the Office client application.
However, everything works fine with 1 specific content type. Even though the others using exactly the same site columns. The content types are deployed using visual studio to the content type hub, and after this the content types are correctly published to
the site collections, there are no publish issues here.
When I create a document based on the second content type in the same library, all fields are showed in the document information panel, except the managed metadata columns.
Detailed explanation:
Library: procedures
Content types:
- simple procedure (with 4 managed metadata fields and some other text fields)
- procedure with approval (with the same 4 managed metadata fields and some other text fields)
Scenario 1: I add the 'simple procedure' content type to the procedures library as only content type. Everything works fine, and all fields show correctly in the document information panel in Word.
Scenario 2: I add the 'procedure with approval' content type to the procedures library as only content type. Everything works fine, and all fields show correctly in the document information panel in Word.
Scenario 3: I add the 'simple procedure' and 'procedure with approval' content types to the document library procedures (added simple procedure first). When I create a new document based on the 'simple procedure'
content type, everything works fine and he shows all metadata fields. When I add a new document based on the 'procedure with approval' content type, the document information panel shows correctly, except all managed metadata fields. These are not visible at
all. Though they worked perfectly in scenario 1 and 2.
Is this a known issue or is there a workaround for this?
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards, Davy

Yes!
This problem is solved right now.
My issue was that I'm using custom content types deployed by Visual Studio in the content type hub. To create a managed metadata site column in visual studio, you need to have first of all your managed metadata field, but also a hidden field accompagnied
to make the actual mapping like the example below:
<Field ID="{B654D984-187A-471B-8738-F08F3356CFDA}"
Type="TaxonomyFieldType"
DisplayName="Countries"
ShowField="Term1033"
EnforceUniqueValues="FALSE"
Group="Demo"
StaticName="Countries"
Name="Countries">
<Customization>
<ArrayOfProperty>
<Property>
<Name>TextField</Name>;
<Value xmlns:q6="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" p4:type="q6:string" xmlns:p4="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">{67308AC2-9556-456B-BF9E-43E8F23EBEE6}</Value>
</Property>
</ArrayOfProperty>
</Customization>
</Field>
<Field Type="Note"
DisplayName="Countries_0"
StaticName="CountriesTaxHTField0"
Name="CountriesTaxHTField0"
ID="{67308AC2-9556-456B-BF9E-43E8F23EBEE6}"
ShowInViewForms="FALSE"
Required="FALSE"
Hidden="TRUE"
CanToggleHidden="TRUE"
Group="Demo"
RowOrdinal="0"
/>
</Elements>
VERY important here is that when you create your content type using visual studio, you not only have to add the managed metadata site column in your xml (which let the content type work already perfectly) but also add the hidden field to your content type
xml !! This way, SharePoint knows that when you have multiple content types with the same site columns in the same library, the second content type also need to get the hidden field from this site columns like in the example below!
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Elements xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/">
;
<ContentType ID="0x010100571ebc0f478a49d5a775039347ee1535"
Name="Document Location"
Group="Demo"
Description="A content type containing Managed Metadata Column."
Inherits="TRUE"
Version="0">
<FieldRefs>
<FieldRef ID="{B654D984-187A-471B-8738-F08F3356CFDA}" Name="Countries"/>
<FieldRef ID="{67308AC2-9556-456B-BF9E-43E8F23EBEE6}" Name="CountriesTaxHTField0"/>
<FieldRef ID="{f3b0adf9-c1a2-4b02-920d-943fba4b3611}" Name="TaxCatchAll"/>
<FieldRef ID="{8f6b6dd8-9357-4019-8172-966fcd502ed2}" Name="TaxCatchAllLabel"/>
</FieldRefs>
</ContentType>
</Elements>
I'm very happy I found this solution, because in the whole project i'm implementing, this was used a lot!
Special thanks to the blog of @cann0nf0dder (http://cann0nf0dder.wordpress.com/2013/04/01/creating-a-site-column-with-managed-metadata) which let me think about this!
This ticket is answered now! :-)
Kind regards,
Davy

Searching Multiple Content Types

What is the best way to do an attribute search across multiple content types that may or may not have the same attributes? I've subclassed the document type to create an image type like they have in the examples. I would like to do a search across the name attribute of the document and the height attribute of the image. The results I get is the cartesian product of the two classes which is not very useful. Is there a way to do this?

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that it displayed only the first eleven content types after you set up multiple content type in your libraries.
I have created lots of content types and added them to library and it worked fine.
Please check the configuration of the content type order in library settings -> Change new button order and default content type, and provide the screen shot about is.
Please add multiple content types you created to other libraries and other libraries in other site collections and test whether this issue occurs.
Best Regards,
Dean Wang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

View for multiple Content Type List

Hello
I have a SP list with multiple Content types.
i want add a kind of view for the list that have diffrent content types for the some item/record.
it means that every time someone edit this item and change/add diffrent data in diffrent contant type
is there any way to do that?
or there is a way to add the Content type dropdown list in Display view and not just in Edit view? can i do it in SP Designer?

Hi Avinoam, do you have access to InfoPath? You can do what your asking with that program.
cameron rautmann

I need help using multiple content types in a wiki page library

I currently trying to used multiple custom content types based off of the wiki page content type in one wiki page library.
EDIT: "Allow management of content types" has been enabled with the designer
The way i would like this library to work is:
Click the "Files" tab in the ribbon
Click the "New Document" drop down menu
Select one of the content types (Client, Contact, Project)
SharePoint Will Ask for the Page Name and content type fields
Click create
Then it will take you to the new created page.
This issue I'm currently having is when i click on one of the options (Client, Contact, Project) it will ask for a page name then you have to check it in to get to the edit form. The edit form it then loads is the default content type and not the selected
content type.
So my questions are.
Is there any way i can combine the page name and edit steps together into one step?
How can I get the edit form to pull from the selected content type?
Thanks in advanced
James T.F

Wiki library isn't really designed for customizations... it's a "special" library that overrides a lot of default behavior... similar evidence can be found if you're trying to add metadata columns to wiki pages... they're just not really designed to handle
it very well.
Scott Brickey
MCTS, MCPD, MCITP
www.sbrickey.com
Strategic Data Systems - for all your SharePoint needs

Changed content type (DDOCTYPE) is not visible in GUI

Hi,
I have strange problem. I made configuration import from other UCM machine (content types, metadata, security groups and so..). After import I checked it - I have my security groups there, I have my metadata there, but I DO NOT HAVE there my content type (in drop down box there are only couple of preinstalled content types - Acme xxx Department...). I have checked in the admin applets -> configuration manager and my added content type was there (among the 'Acme ....' preinstalled content types). I even deleted those 'Acme....' content types to be sure that only my one is there. But in the search gui there is still drop down box with 'Acme...' types and my own is missing there.
Strange because I do not know why it shows content types which have been deleted and are not in database anymore. I checked the database and in the table DOCTYPES there is only my own content type.
Can anybody give me som hint? I tried restarting servers, clearing browser's cache, but still without success.

Hi. I tried it, but it did not help. :(
It is strange. Before I had the error in log:
Unable to rename '/appl/ucm_cluster/server/weblayout/resources/schema.work' to '/appl/ucm_cluster/server/weblayout/resources/schema' while publishing schema.
When I looked into the 'schema' dir there was old doctypes in js file
In 'shcema.work' which was supposed to be renamed to 'schema' there was my correct document type in js file.
Now in /server/weblayout/resources/schema/views/doctypes/all.js file there is only my correct document type but i still have in gui the old wrong doctypes! :(

Issue with New Document in a document library with multiple content types

Hi,
I have a created a custom list definition based on a document library. I added 3 content types in this list, one is a document set (lets call it DOCSET), the two others are content types inheriting from Document (DOCA and DOCB).
I deployed the list definition with a site scoped feature and the list instance with a web scoped feature. After activating the two features, the list is created and the content types are present in the list.
When I click in the New Document button and choose either the DOCA or DOCB content type, a Word document opens and the DOCA content type is always associated to this Word document.
With SharePoint Manager 2013 I saw that the template.dotx document was not in the Forms/DOCA or Forms/DOCB folder.
So I decided to remove all the content types from the list definition and add them by code with the ListAdded event receiver. I used list.ContentTypes.Add to add the content types to the list.
With this method the templates are correctly copied from the template.dotx in the RootFolder/Forms folder of my list. These templates have the rights content type id, but the New Document button still does not work properly.
So I looked at the Content Types inside my library and saw that the DocumentTemplateUrl linked to the RootFolder/Forms/template.dotx and not the RootFolder/Forms/DOCA/template.dotx or RootFolder/Forms/DOCB/template.dotx.
I debugged my code to look closer and see that right after the list.ContentTypes.Add, the DocumentTemplateUrl is correclty set but when my EventReceiver finishes, the DocumentTemplateUrl get back to the RootFolder/Forms/template.dotx.
Have you any idea why this is not working ?
Regards

Hi,
Per my understanding, there is an issue about the DOCA and DOCB content types which inherits from Document Content Type in your custom list definition.
By default, if there is a custom content type inherits the OOTB Document Content Type, it will also inherits the template.dotx file from the OOTB Document Content Type.
The template URL of a custom content type which inherits the OOTB Document Content Type:
If you want to specify different templates for different content types, the code demo below would be helpful:
http://www.learningsharepoint.com/2010/07/14/programmatically-create-a-new-content-type-in-sharepoint-2010/
Thanks
Patrick Liang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

List with Multiple Content Types and Making new Forms...

I go to create custom forms based on content types. After I create using the wizard in the list it always shows the same form no matter which content type I pick.
what am I doing wrong?
David Jenkins

You can change the custom form on content type through SharePoint Designer. Do not change it on the content type directly, when you add content type in a list/library, then open list's content types in SP Designer and then select your content type and modify
the URLs of your custom display form.
I have updated a document in gallery for
step by step development of custom workflow and custom task form. In this document you can find the association of custom form with content type using SP Designer.
Adnan Amin MCT, SharePoint Architect | If you find this post useful kindly please mark it as an answer :)

.vcf contains multiple contacts, but only first contact appears on nano?

Hi- love my nano, but am having trouble getting contact info into it.
I use Palm Desktop (not Outlook) for Windows (that won't get me shot here, I hope!) and exported multiple (about 30) of my Palm contacts in one .vcf file (version 2.1), but when I copy said .vcf file into my nano\contacts folder (treating it as a hard disk) and pull up Contacts on the nano, the device only displays the first contact in the file, not all contacts.
While I didn't find any threads here about this specific issue, I did see some old threads elsewhere about importing multiple-vs-single-contact .vcf files, but they seemed to pertain to the 3G/4G iPod, not the nano.
Is it possible that the nano can just handle single-contact .vcf files?
At the risk of repeating myself, the issue is not the exporting -- I can open the .vcf file in a text editor and see that all contacts are contained therein -- it's in getting the nano to display all of the contacts listed in the file, not just the first one.
I apologize in advance if I've breached any posting etiquette. I'm a quick learner, so a slap to the wrist should be sufficient.
TIA- AndymanD
Windows XP

Information on adding contacts manually available here in the iPod 101:
http://www.apple.com/support/ipod101/maximize/2/
Regards,
Colin R.

Includes and multiple content-Type directives

ok,
myGreatPage.jsp:
<%@ page contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" %>
<%@ include file="header2.jsp" %>
header2.jsp:
<%@ page contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" %>
this triggers an error, that i cant have multiple occurrences of "contentType", which is logical, but imagine if both the files above contain russian or estonian characters and therefore need to be saved in UTF8 format.
If I remove the <%@ page contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" %> from header2.jsp i get three weird characters at the top of my web page.
Help! whats the best way to do this ? thx merci beaucoup takk bitte spaciba

Yeah... the reason is this...
When you do an <%@ include, you are essentially telling the JSP compiler to read that included file in and insert it into the parent page. It would basically do this by opening the file itself. It's just a fancy copy/paste of the code. So you'd end up with 2 contentType directives, which is one problem.
The reason for the screwing up of the text is that when it opens the included file to read it in, it's using the character encoding that the OS or the server was started to use, probably either Cp1252 or ISO8895-1, which of course, screws up the UTF-8 chars.
The 2 ways to resolve this is to make sure the server starts with the option to use UTF-8 as the default character encoding, so it reads the files properly (presuming you've saved those files as UTF-8 encoding). Or make all the text that uses non-ASCII chars is written as Unicode escapes (\uXXXX) format. You can use the native2ascii tool to do that translation.

Update Item when Content Type is changed in the browser

I feel like I might be missing something obvious here - I set up a number of managed content types. While editing a list item with multiple content types, when a user changes to a different content type using the drop down at the top of the page,
the edits are not saved. Is there any way to force an update when the user changes content type? Clicking save returns the user to the list view which means the user needs to edit it again, and navigate to the content type.

Hi Steve,
Per my understanding, you might want to update item with the input values when content type changed by selecting an option in the “Content Type” drop down menu in
EditForm.aspx page.
A Content Type is a set of predefined columns, from the perspective of the use of Content Type in a list, it would be easier to maintain per record with only one content
type as an item, this is also a recommended behavior when working with multiple content types in a list.
If you want to take use of columns from multiple content types in an item, a suggestion is that you can create a custom content type with the columns from other content
types you want, then add it into your list.
Thanks
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Best Practises for using Content Types

We had third party vendor who migrated and re structured contents and sites in Sharepoint 2010. I noticed one unusual thing : In most cases they new separate site content types for every library in a site i.e. even if two libraries contain same set of metadata
columns they created separate site content types by duplicating it from the first one and gave it unique name and used in second library.
My point of view for content type is that they are used for re usability, i.e. if another library is needing same set of metadata columns then I would just reuse existing content type rather than creating another content type with different name by inheriting
it from the first one and having same set of columns.
When I asked vendor reason for this approach (for every library they created new content types and for libraries needing same set of meta data columns they just inherited from a custom site content type and created another duplicate one with same set of
meta data columns and gave it different name in most cases name of library ) they said they did that to classify documents which I did not agree with because by creating two document libraries classification is already done.
I need some expert advice on this, I will really appreciate: I understand content types are useful and they provide re usability but,
A) Do we need to create new site content types whenever we create new library ? (Even though we are not going to re use them)
B) What is best practice : if few libraries are needing same set of metadata columns
1) Create site a content type and reuse it in those libraries ? or
2) Create a site content type and create new content types by inheriting from site content type created at first and just give them different name even though all of them are having same set of columns ?
I need expert advice on this but following is my own opinion on this
I do not think point A) is a good practice and should not be used, we should create site content type only when we think it will be re used and we do not need to create site content type every time we create document library. Also I do not think point 2)
of B is a good practice as well
Dhaval Raval

It depends on the nature of the content types and the libraries. If the document types really are shared between document libraries then use the same ones. If the content types are distinct and non overlapping items that have different processes, rules or
uses then breaking them out into a separate content type is the way forward.
As an example for sharing content types: Teams A and B have different document libraries. Both fill in purchase orders, although they work on different projects. In this case they use the same form and sharing a content type is the no question approach.
As an example for different content types: A company has two arms, a consultancy where they send people out to client sites and a manufacturing team who build hardware. Both need to fill in timesheets but whilst the metadata fields on both are the same the
forms are different and/or are processed in a different manner.
You can make a case either way, i prefer to keep the content types simple and only expand out when there's a proven need and a user base with experience with them. It means that if you wanted to subdivide later you'd have more of a headache but that's a
risk I generally think works out.

Incorrect Infopath content type update in form library after modifying Infopath form and publish it

I have an admin approved InfoPath form. I added new fields to that form and mapped those new fields with site columns. After uploading updated published form through CA, I noticed InfoPath Site content type for that form got updated (with newly added fields)
under Microsoft_Infopath group. This content type is also added in form library but somehow the new fields are updated incorrectly for this content type existing in form library (it doesn't show new fields, and shows one new field which is incorrectly
mapped with other column this is happening only in library).
Things I tried:
- Activate/Deactivate that content type feature
- Deactivated feature, removed form from CA, re uploaded and activated feature
- Removed those new fields and published and uploaded InfoPath form and then added those new fields and published and uploaded again.
-Deleted those fields from InfoPath and readded new fields and published and uploaded form but still the problem persists.
Any help will be appreciated.
Dhaval Raval

Hi Thanks for the response,
But Update all content types inheriting from this type is already checked.
That form library has multiple content types associated with it , different infopath forms get submitted there. What I noticed is that when I change the form and publish it, its corresponding site content type gets updated but the same content type used
in form library doesn't get updated properly. I went to form library and checked that erroneous content type, there were some columns missing and one column was mapped incorrectly. When I clicked on "Parent" content type, it was showing all the new Infopath
fields(updated content type). So I figured that Infopath site content type was getting updated correctly but it was not able to propagate those updates (in a correct way) to the form library. I also tried to edit that content type and tried adding existing
site columns which were missing but surprisingly it was not showing those site columns either, which were mapped from Infopath publishing.
The cause for this behavior is : changes/updates to the Infopath content type are not getting propagated to the form library and this is happening for only one infopath content type but other Infopath content types are getting updated.
I had to delete all the forms using that erroneous content type and then had to delete that content type from the library and then re-added that Infopath content type to the library and this time it was having correct content type (updated columns).
This is not a perfect solution for the production environment, sounds like it is a bug.
Dhaval Raval

Content type hide on New button but keep enabled on Upload

I have several content types in my document libraries. There is one content type that I want to hide on the New button, but keep enabled in the Upload drop-down for content type.
How can I do this?
thanks!

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to hide content type on New button but keep enabled on Upload.
There are two properties in SharePoint that affect the visibility of content types. These are:
Visible on New Button (can be set through the UI – List’s Settings – screenshot)
The Hidden property of the SPContentType object (can be set only through the object model)
There are some blog blogs thread for your reference:
Content type visibility in document libraries
Change content type order in NEW button of a SharePoint library
How to Hide Default Content Type from "New" menu
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Assign new default forms to list causes other content types forms to fail.

I have a list with multiple content types and I want to modify the forms. I've created new forms but when I assign them as default and go back to the new item menu, no matter which item I select I get the new default form. If I set the
NewForm.aspx back as default everything works.
How can I modify for one content type and ensure the forms are not affected?
By modify I mean I want to put a hyperlink on one of the forms but not the other.

Form libraries can be very painful if you can't foresee the direction that the form will be evolving over time. I've run into times when users have been using a form for months - years, and then a sudden change is needed (such as a change in calculations)
that they want to show ONLY in new forms, and the old calculations (for the same calculated fields) to show up in the old form, and you can't have 2 different versions of the same form working on a library unless you use content types.
You also, however, need to plan for columns and column types because of limitations around the number of Int columns or date/time columns, etc... that are allowed in a list. If you plan on using content types, I would say use a base content type (if
the content types will have the same fields) and then the fewer fields are different, the fewer columns are required on the library. In different content types, you can use different forms, and then you can make different calculations within the forms
for the same field (if that is ever a requirement).
Its best to plan this out ahead of time, because switching strategy after running for a while can create monstrous headaches.

Multiple Content types only first 11 visible

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for