Multiple KMS keys for same product (i.e. Office 2013)

So on this domain I support, they have a KMS host which is set up correctly for Office 2013 and there is no problem with it, but recently additional licenses for Office 2013 were purchased.
On the volume licensing website, it shows Office 2013 and the number of licenses has increased as a result of the new purchase, so that is correct as well.  Under license keys though there is another MAK and KMS key.
What do I do with the new KMS key?  Anything?  Clearly Microsoft have got the correct licensing total.  Never been in a situation before where licenses were purchased incrementally like this.

"slmgr.vbs /dlv all" can also be used, this will display all product keys
At a guess, MS have issued a new set of VL keys for the new/additional purchase, which I'd agree is a little unexpected/unnecessary, given you already have these products in your agreement.
It's probably some kind of automatic action that doesn't take into account a previous purchase in the same agreement period.
Yes, KMS is fiddly, especially the bolt-on aspects of Office. MS have tackled that, with the new ADBA approach, which makes things a lot simpler to manage via a builtin GUI in WS2012.
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

Similar Messages

  • How do I install multiple KMS keys on one server?

    I currently am working at Phelps County Regional Medical Center in Rolla, MO and my question is: How do I install multiple KMS keys onto one server? This is very urgent and I have the KMS activating Windows 7 but, I also need all my Office keys, Windows
    8, and Windows 8.1  to be activated via KMS. the current KMS is a Windows Server 2008 R2 server. Please help me out and thank you for your time! :)

    you need to apply the following update (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2885698)to your KMS server so you can license up to Windows 8.1.  From there your key for 8.1/2012R2 will license everything
    downwards and then you can also install your Office KMS key without issue.  If its Office 2013 then you need to download the files here (http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=35584) 
    Be kind and Mark as Answer if I helped.

  • Multiple tool for same product.

    Dear All,
                   please guide me for my scenario given below:
    how work center is to be decided whether machine wise or tool wise.because one macine can be load by four different tool at a time.
    Regards
    Deepak Sharma

    Hi Deepak sharma.
    since u have Number of workcenters for same product, create routing for each work center, and create prod versions equal  number of workcenters.
    u can select the prodution version manually, while cerating production order manaully.
    There should be a capacity planning  for your work center.
    Have i tried to understand ur problem,if not please come back with some examples.
    Regards
    pradeep

  • Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor

    All SAP Gurus,
    Is it possible to have Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor code (where purchasing org and company code is same)?
    Regards,

    hi,
    You can't have more than one because the reconcilation account...Because this is the soul account by which you pay to vendor and send the details to further process to FI dept...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • 2 SKUs for same product in SNP

    Hello.
    My client is trying to close the following gap. Can anyone please suggest me or point in the right direction so as to solve this issue.
    We have a situation where for the same product there is the SKU A produced in the plant A and distributed to DCs A1 and A2 (letu2019s say the SKU A is to cover the South region). And the SKU B produced in the plant B and distributed to DCs B1 and B2 (SKU B is to cover the North region).
          The gap is, letu2019s suppose that the plant A doesnu2019t have enough capacity to produce the SKU A, the plant A request to the plant B to produce the remain quantity with the SKU B.
        Plant B produce and transfer the SKU B to the plant A.
       Plant A transfer the SKU B to the DCs A1 and A2.
    Question is here SKUB and SKUA correspond to the same product. So is it possible to have different SKUs for same product. We have to do this as it is a business call. They want to have 2 different SKUs for same product.  Is it possible to do this in SNP interchangeability concept..
    Thank you very much,
    Sai

    Here's how I'd do it:
    Extend SKU A to Plant B and extend SKU B to Plant A.  Create a BOM at both which is the same but with SKU A and B at their opposite plants having one extra layer (having their SKU counterparts as components of one another).  Then set up T-lanes for plant A to procure SKU A from plant B (and vice versa).  So plant A will have two sources of supply for SKU A - a t-lane to procure from plant B and a PDS/PPM at plant A.  Also, SKU A at plant A will have some dependent demand from any planned order on SKU B at plant A.  And once again, the same holds true for the reverse.
    Downside here is of course there are more manual steps in the execution process for the production/process orders.  There are probably other gurus who have answers as to how to do this as well.

  • Multiple tax lines for same item

    Hi,
    Is it possible to have multiple tax lines for same item in an invoice in AR.
    Business Need - A few items have multiple tax applicable ( e.g. VAT, Service tax, etc ). And for regulatory purpose customer wants to show each tax separately.
    please Advise.
    thanks,
    K

    Hi Hikumar,
    With tax groups you have what is called compound taxes.
    A tax group is consisted of more than one tax codes and these tax codes may be related or not to each other,you can also specify the precedence of the tax codes in a tax group.
    On the Invoice or order item line, the tax group code is entered and the tax engine calculates the tax for each tax code that belongs to the tax group.
    If the user wants to see the taxes of this line he will see detailed the tax amounts and rates of each tax code that belong to this group.
    In my case i have used a tax group with 3 tax codes with the structure:
    Item line amount 1000
    1)The first line is a specific sales tax(12%) with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*12%=120
    2)The second line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount calculated from the first tax of the group=120*23%=27,6
    3) The third line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*23%=230
    For each item line that has the above tax group, the system creates three seperate tax lines
    Your case does not seem so complicate as mine.
    You can find more information on the AR user guide and the Oracle receivables tax manual.
    On which Ebs version are you working on?
    If you sent me more detailed you requirement i can quide you on the way to implement it and test it.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Olga

  • Invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer

    Hi Team,
    I just wanted to know if we can create manual invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer?
    For project based invoice request i have create based on single invoice request.
    Appreciate your input here.
    Thanks,
    Nitin

    Dear Ratish,
    Thanks for yr reply.
    I already did that but it is not serving business purpose.
    Comm payment  - comes diff time than sales payment.
    so ,I will post one entry customer will get hit with total amount Sales + commission
    like below
    Let say 10, 000 is the sales value and 500 is the commission
    So , This entry will get posted
    Customer Db- 10,500
    Sales Cr- 10,000
    Comm Income Cr- 500
    But, As I said sales amt will be paid before so We need to clear it partially and some time customer pays also diff amount due to some defect.
    So, We wont be knowing for which case we have or havnet received the payment against commission.
    As , Customer account is got hit with total amount( Sales+ Comm..value).
    Pls advise how to solve this.
    Regards,
    Sukh

  • Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

    The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
    time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
    Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
    with such simple but important tasks.
    I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added. 
    One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
    find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based  on your email history and social media accounts setup.
    And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
    To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list)  that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
    result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
    Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook  2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
    As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
    random contacts.
    From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on  based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
    address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
    And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
    We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
    (And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
    ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
    Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
    For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
    book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
    If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave),  no results are found at all.
    Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
    I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields. 
    Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding  their info and
    I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
    ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
    For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
    In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
    only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
    ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
    Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply  cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
    field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing  that would prevent them from showing up in results.
    These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
    address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
    For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
    main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
    Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

    Thanks for your reply.
    1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
    I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
    2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
    already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
    Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
    local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
    Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
    ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
    Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book! 
    In summary:
    We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
    We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
    There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
    There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
    Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
    One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
    I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
    I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

  • Different batches for same product in one HU

    Dear SAP Gurus:
    I have a couple of questions:
    1. Can you have multiple batches for the same product on one HU?
    2. If the answer is YES, what do I need to do because right now when we try to scan the product ID which includes the batch the system does not saves the scanned batch on the HU but it leaves the one that the "Delivery Document" already had. We tried deleting the batch (leaving it blank) on the "Delivery Doc." but still it does not saves the scanned batch.
    Thank You in advance for your help.

    Mario,
    Be sure you can pack multiple batches in one HU in standard system. What's more, you can pack several different materials and HUs in one HU.
    I'm not familiar with RF but you can check this link and you can also ask HU experts on LE forum:
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/76/ea7c38b5e211d391cf0008c7d94f4b/frameset.htm
    You can use this transaction to pick and pack material in one step. This can be useful, for example, if you need to pick several materials to be packed into one handling unit (HU). You can select an existing handling unit or create a new one. Identify the materials to be picked and packed by the delivery number.
    Regards,
    Csaba

  • Releasing a portion of Forecast for SAME product to SNP and a portion to R3

    After running  DP forecasting, can a portion of the forecast for the SAME product be released to SNP and a portion transferred to R3 ?
    The requirement here is for a product, say Prod1, demand comes from 2 Business lines. Through Project System u2013 PS module, system differentiated the business lines
    From a DP phase 1 perspective, client want to do global forecasting for 2 business lines
    The challenge we r facing is demand coming from Business line 2 cannot be consumed in SNP as demand comes in the form of Automatic Reservations and CIF doesnt have the capability to CIF automatic reservations. Standard CIF only cifs manual reservations. So client wants the forecast for Business line 2 (Note that this is for the same product) to be transferred to R3.
    So can a portion of the forecast for the SAME product be released to SNP and a portion transferred to R3 ?
    TIA

    Hi Visu, thanks for the reply
    So if If I want to release the demand plan as a background job to both R/3 and SNP based on certain characteristic(Business Line), I  am thinking of doing the below things.
    Release to R3 -- >
    1. Create a Transfer Profile
    2 . Create an Activity using "MC8T- Define Activities for Mass Processing" and assign this transfer profile to the activity.
    3. Create a Planning Job by selecting a Selection ID( that has the demand separation characteristic)
    4. Schedule the Planning Job
    Release to SNP -- >
    1. Create a Release Profile
    2 . Create an Activity using "MC8T- Define Activities for Mass Processing" and assign this Release profile to the activity.
    3. Create a Planning Job by selecting a Selection ID( that has the demand separation characteristic)
    4. Schedule the Planning Job
    However, I am not sur eif I can do the follwoing.
    1. Can I create a SINGLE Planning job to release demand BOTH to R3 and SNP ?
    2. If I am using Different Key Figures in the planning area( per business line), do I have the need to maintain a separate characteristic value in the POS, as anyway I can load the data from cube to these separate key figures based on business line ?
    3. MOST IMPORTANTLY, if I use different planning jobs to release to R3 and SNP, I can have different selection ID's ( per business line) and select these in the planning job instead of maintaing TWO DIFFERENT Key figures. do you think this is feasible ? Any thoughts/advice ?
    TIA

  • F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

    Hello,
    Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
    I understand that there are two places:
    FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
    Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
    Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
    In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
    I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
    Thanks everyone.

    Ravi,
    Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
    In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
    1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
    2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
    3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
    4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
    Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
    That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
    Comments please?

  • How to make Different Price for same product in one Sale Order

    How can i customizing my system?
    I need to sale for different price same product A in one sale order. And price condition type cant be manually. i can separate them by position. for ex. in first position: product A is one price and in 2nd product A with discount. i tried to do it by changing a price group for 2nd position to determinate a discount condition but it generates invoice split.
    Someone have any suggestions?

    Hi
    you can have it automatically determined after some custo and using userexit_pricing_prepare_tkomp in MV45AFZZ and RV60AFZZ.
    The idea is to use ítem category field (PSTYV) as a part of pricing data to determine different prices for same material by changing manually ítem category when creating a sales order
    - you'll need to create a new ítem category copied from the one you´re using and do all assignments
    - add field PSTYV, if not there, to pricing field catalog. This thread has an example on how to and coding required for userexits
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/1693234
    - Adjust your pricing sequence as per new table
    - Maintain specific prices in new table for materials with this new ítem category
    Finally, when creating a sales order change, when required, default ítem category by new one to get specific price for material.
    Regards,
    JM

  • Reg..selling price for same product by sea and air

    Hi
    i have a basic question pl explain me
    my client selling the product to customer two ways by sea and air.if they sell the product by sea that is one cost(say Rs 12).If they sell by sea that's is one cost (say Rs 10),for same customer, how we define in SAP.
    Are we create two customer code for same customer or any other setting is there?
    Thanks&Regards
    Selva

    Hi Selva,
          This is can be configure easily,by selecting field in you condition table (V/03),here you need to select your org elements (Ex: sales org,Disb channel,Customer ) and also shipping type (VSART), and maintain the access sequence and condition type.In VK11 maintain condition record for that and finally you need to specify the shipping type in your sales order shipping tab (Air,Sea) according to that the price will pick form record.
             You may not find VSART (Shipping type) in standard field catalog it should be add from Conditions: Allowed fields,once you add it will come to filed catalog.
    Thanks
    Ram

  • 2LIS_02_HDR - Multiple records coming for same EBELN, why?

    Hello All,
    I ran a setup table for init and tested extraction in rsa3 for  data source 2LIS_02_HDR , only one EBELN and it retrievs 3 records for same EBELN. As per my understanding the header data comes from EKKO hence it should bring only one record but retireves multiple records,I want to know why this happens?
    thanks
    V Pola
    Edited by: V pola on Jan 30, 2008 5:35 PM

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply. The link does not explain why 2LIS_02_HDr retrieves multiple records instead of one.
    Thanks
    V Pola

  • Re: MTO & MTS for same product

    Hi Experts,
    How to configure both MTO & MTS for a same product.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Hi Experts,
    I am having a requirment for MTO Subcontracting order.The customer issues raw material for the production for the FG product. Now I want that the system should do the Planning for the FG by MRP & also to calculate the the raw material required. The system should also be able to created purchase requisition for the deficit raw material. The raw material should not have any financial implication i.e. they are are only relevent for stock posting & not for any valuation purpose.
    Here my client is the subcontractor. So he does production for Other clients as well.
    Please advise.
    Regards,
    Vivek

Maybe you are looking for