Multiple MHD with same message type

Hi,
Can seeburger handle the following Tradacom EDI standards
MHD: ORDHDR
MHD:ORDHDR
Is it normally allowed for seeburger to do such a mapping. I believe that any normal EDI file should have only one MHD:order header file with orders.
Regards
Krish

Now my requirement is that after every 10 hours all the files should be picked and merged
(append) into a single file as target file.
Check the use of "Availability Time Planning" of the adapter in your case
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/11/26/adapter-scheduling--hail-sp-19-
If your requirement is to append you can do so by using the File Construction mode as Append in receiver File adapter
If your req is to do a N:1 mapping (i.e. merger) then develop a mapping program accordingly...
Regards,
Abhishek.
Edited by: abhishek salvi on Jun 3, 2009 10:30 AM

Similar Messages

Multiple files (with same message type) into a single file

Dear All,
I am having multiple files(same message type) with details like header data and its line item details in each file. The structure of all the files will be:
File1    File2   File3
H1        H2      H3
L1         L1      L1
L2
L3
Now my requirement is that after every 10 hours all the files should be picked and merged (append) into a single file as target file. The structure of output file will be now like
H1
L1
L2
L3
H2
L1
H3
L1
Kindly guide on how to proceed on this with BPM or without BPM
Regards,
NJ

Now my requirement is that after every 10 hours all the files should be picked and merged
(append) into a single file as target file.
Check the use of "Availability Time Planning" of the adapter in your case
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/11/26/adapter-scheduling--hail-sp-19-
If your requirement is to append you can do so by using the File Construction mode as Append in receiver File adapter
If your req is to do a N:1 mapping (i.e. merger) then develop a mapping program accordingly...
Regards,
Abhishek.
Edited by: abhishek salvi on Jun 3, 2009 10:30 AM

Multiple IDOCS of same message type To Single File

Hi Sap All.
here i have got a tricky situation of sending Multiple IDOC's of same type to a Single File via PI.
the Integration architect has created an Integration Gudeline of how to do this.
from the SAP-ECC side the follwing below are the steps thatr he mentioned
To allow IDOCu2019s to be processed sequentially in a queue, the queue processing option on the partner profile must be selected. In addition the rule name which is used to create queue names must be specified.
NB On the partner profile (for the partner / message type) you must also set the output mode as collect IDOCu2019s (it cannot be set to transfer immediately) u2013 This means the IDOCu2019s are created but not sent to out (to SAP PI)
As standard there are two rule names delivered CONSTANT:EDIQUEUE and FIRST_16_OF_MESTYP. These rule names are linked to a SAP function module and therefore custom queue names can be build either as an u201Chardcodedu201D name or based on the data in the IDOC.
The program RSEOUT00 should be run to transfer the IDOCu2019s to PI. The IDOCu2019s will be placed in the SAP ERP qRFC (rather than the standard RFC)
My Questions :
1. how and where we can select the Queue Processing option on partner profile in SAP-ECC as mentioned above
2.how and where we can define the Rule name as mentioned above
3.how and where we can set the output mode as Collect IDOC's in SAP-ECC as mentioned above
4.what does the EDIQUEUE and FIRST_16_OF_MESTYP will do and how they linked to SAP Function modules
will be waiitng for a the best solutions.
Regards.
Varma

/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2009/05/21/xipi-collecting-idocs--possible-ways-with-pros-and-cons--5-ways - you will need to do a collect

Topic: Incorrect Tag:Multiple Attributes with Same Collection Type

I have an Object Type that contains multiple attributes with the same collection type. When I use OracleXML getXML to generate xml, the tag for all elements created for any of the matching types is the tag for the 1st of the similar attributes.
work_t_v is an object view of a relational schema
SQL> desc work_t_v
Name Null? Type
WORK_ID NUMBER(38)
TITLE_OF_WORK VARCHAR2(512)
MESH_HEADINGS MESH_HEADINGS_T
AUTHORS AUTHORS_T
COMMENT_ON WORK_REFERENCES_T
COMMENT_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
ERRATUM_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
REPUBLISHED_FROM WORK_REFERENCES_T
REPUBLISHED_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
SQL> desc work_references_t
work_references_t TABLE OF WORK_REFERENCE_T
Name Null? Type
REFSOURCE VARCHAR2(255)
NOTE VARCHAR2(255)select
work.work_id,
work.title_of_work,
work.comment_on comment_on,
work.comment_in comment_in,
work.erratum_in erratum_in,
work.republished_from republished_from,
work.republished_in republished_in
from work_t_v work
where work_id = 99350984
results in tag of <comment_on> for all the elements built from the work_references_t type (i.e., there are no <comment_in>, <erratum_in>, <republished_from> or <republished_in> elements)
sample result is:
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [CommentOn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [CommentIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [ErratumIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [RepublishedFrom]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [RepublishedIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
The above xml should be:
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [CommentOn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_IN>
<COMMENT_IN_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [CommentIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_IN_ITEM>
</ERRATUM_IN>
<COMMENT_ON>
<ERRATUM_IN_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [ErratumIn]</REFSOURCE>
</ERRATUM_IN_ITEM>
</ERRATUM_IN>
<REPUBLISHED_FROM>
<REPUBLISHED_FROM_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [RepublishedFrom]</REFSOURCE>
</REPUBLISHED_FROM_ITEM>
</REPUBLISHED_FROM>
<REPUBLISHED_IN>
<REPUBLISHED_IN_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601 [RepublishedIn]</REFSOURCE>
</REPUBLISHED_IN_ITEM>
</REPUBLISHED_IN>bracketed portion [] is contained within the refsource string to indicate what type of reference it should be displayed as.
I also found that if I use the -withDTD parameter to include the dtd, the dtd includes the appropriate elements (comment_in, erratum_in, republished_from and republished_in). However, it incorrectly defines refsource and note multiple times (once for each WORK_REFERENCES_T attribute).
Are these known problems? Will they be fixed? I'm more concerned about the XML problem than the DTD problem.
Thanks! -- John Butler
null

Using the version of XML SQL Utility that comes with the next XSQL Servlet release 0.9.8.6 I did the following:
create type foo as object (a number);
create type foolist as table of foo;
create view fooview
as select
cast(multiset(
select sal from emp where rownum < 2)
as foolist) list1,
cast(multiset(
select sal from emp where rownum < 2)
as foolist) list2
from dual;
When I request a "SELECT * FROM FOOVIEW"
through getXML I get:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ROWSET>
<ROW num="1">
<LIST1>
<LIST1_ITEM>
<A>800</A>
</LIST1_ITEM>
</LIST1>
<LIST2>
<LIST2_ITEM>
<A>800</A>
</LIST2_ITEM>
</LIST2>
</ROW>
</ROWSET>
So this appears fixed in the next code drop.
In the interim, I'll email you the new JAR file until (since it won't be on OTN for a few more days).
null

Incorrect Tag:Multiple Attributes with Same Collection Type

I have an Object Type that contains multiple attributes with the
same collection type. When I use OracleXML getXML to generate
xml, the tag for all elements created for any of the matching
types is the tag for the 1st of the similar attributes.
work_t_v is an object view of a relational schema
SQL> desc work_t_v
Name Null? Type
WORK_ID NUMBER(38)
TITLE_OF_WORK VARCHAR2(512)
MESH_HEADINGS MESH_HEADINGS_T
AUTHORS AUTHORS_T
COMMENT_ON WORK_REFERENCES_T
COMMENT_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
ERRATUM_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
REPUBLISHED_FROM WORK_REFERENCES_T
REPUBLISHED_IN WORK_REFERENCES_T
SQL> desc work_references_t
work_references_t TABLE OF WORK_REFERENCE_T
Name Null? Type
REFSOURCE VARCHAR2(255)
NOTE VARCHAR2(255)
select
work.work_id,
work.title_of_work,
work.comment_on comment_on,
work.comment_in comment_in,
work.erratum_in erratum_in,
work.republished_from republished_from,
work.republished_in republished_in
from work_t_v work
where work_id = 99350984
results in tag of <comment_on> for all the elements built from
the work_references_t type (i.e., there are no <comment_in>,
<erratum_in>, <republished_from> or <republished_in> elements)
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[CommentOn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[CommentIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[ErratumIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[RepublishedFrom]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON>
<COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
<REFSOURCE>J Infect Dis 1998 Aug;178(2):601
[RepublishedIn]</REFSOURCE>
</COMMENT_ON_ITEM>
</COMMENT_ON>
bracketed portion [] is contained within the refsource string to
indicate what type of reference it should be displayed as.
I also found that if I use the -withDTD parameter to include the
dtd, the dtd includes the appropriate elements (comment_in,
erratum_in, republished_from and republished_in). However, it
incorrectly defines refsource and note multiple times (once for
each WORK_REFERENCES_T attribute).
Are these known problems? Will they be fixed? I'm more
concerned about the XML problem than the DTD problem.
Thanks! -- John Butler
null

Using the version of XML SQL Utility that comes with the next XSQL Servlet release 0.9.8.6 I did the following:
create type foo as object (a number);
create type foolist as table of foo;
create view fooview
as select
cast(multiset(
select sal from emp where rownum < 2)
as foolist) list1,
cast(multiset(
select sal from emp where rownum < 2)
as foolist) list2
from dual;
When I request a "SELECT * FROM FOOVIEW"
through getXML I get:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ROWSET>
<ROW num="1">
<LIST1>
<LIST1_ITEM>
<A>800</A>
</LIST1_ITEM>
</LIST1>
<LIST2>
<LIST2_ITEM>
<A>800</A>
</LIST2_ITEM>
</LIST2>
</ROW>
</ROWSET>
So this appears fixed in the next code drop.
In the interim, I'll email you the new JAR file until (since it won't be on OTN for a few more days).
null

Multiple customers for same message type "invoic" and idoc type "invoic02"

Dear Experts,
I have SAP ALE process configured for single customer u2018Au2019 where I send invoic02 idoc (message type invoic) to the customer via PI server. Now I need to add one more customer u2018Bu2019 which require recepient determination. I am not sure whether this resolution of customer address at PI level or config is required at R3 itself.
I tried to maintain partner profile type as KU but it generates the error "No partner profile is maintained". For existing customer u2018Au2019 I am keeping the partner profile type LS.
I want to know the following:
a.Whether the recipient determination at R3 (config of partner profile we20)- if so what are the essential steps. Do I really need to shift partner profile type as KU?
b.Whether config is required at PI level itself- if so is there any pre-requisite config in R3 to support that in PI.
I hope my question is clear since this is my maiden attempt to seek solution from expert group.
Regards & Thanks

Hi ,
if you want to trigger the idoc two times for basic type& Extension..
1 ) you need to maintain WE20 Partner Profiles (This is good already you did)
--> But the Output type for Bsic type & extension type is same so output type is triggered Once so idoc is created One.
2) try to create another Output type in T-code NACE for extension then two Idocs is created one for Basic and another for Extension.
Regards,
Prabhudas

Same message type and two different IDOCS need to be triggered

Hi,
I have two idocs with same message type,the partner profile is same.
Please tell if there is any way to handle this situation without changing the message type.
Please do the needful.
Thanks,
Nivedita

Hi
We can have same message type for different idoc types.
ex:MATMAS.MATMAS01
MATMAS.MATMAS02
MATMAS.MATMAS03
In the above example MATMAS is the same message type for different idoc types.
Thanks

Want to add multiple idoc type with single message type.

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem. I want to add multiple idoc type with single message type in WE20.
How we can do this in WE20 or is there any other way to do that?
Please help me.
Thanks in advance.
Srimanta.

hi,
basically in partner profile i.e. in we20 , we add details to the receiver / sender port that we have created using we21.
so what exactly we do in that is that we first use the message type for those idocs that we have created.
now based on those message type we create a process code. now this is the reason why you cannot apply several message types with the same name in we20... as process code is unque for each message type.
so thats why you can only assign the same message name to several idocs in we82 and then in we20 define the process code for that message type.
it will solve your problem.
hope this will help you!!!
Thanks & regards,
punit raval.

How to transfer one file to multi sap with same IDOC Type?

Hi all!
I need your help..
My senario is tansfer one xml-file to multi-sap server
with same IDOC type.
IS it possible to transfer without BPM?
I think that the way not using bpm is impossble,
because the file is deleted by sender adapter.
If I'm using BPM, how to design?
I consider 'fork' or 'switch',
but, I guess,
Idoc is will be initialized by other branch at last step.
I hope good information.
Regards.

Hi,
you can create using BPM .
IR
you need to create source for one interface and trager for two differnent interfaces.
suppose if you are doing message mapping in message tab source is one interface targer is multiple interface..so that source can map multiple interfaces...
create the Interface mapping one source two are target interfaces.
Create the Integration proces...
First step is receive step next use the Transformation Step that means source message it will conver two targets...then use the Fork step Recever Determination step goes to the first Send step..
again drag the another receiver determination and use tge send step..close the FORK step.
regards,
venu.

Invoice split with same document type

Hi Experts,
Kindly suggest on following issue:-
Currently we are using two billing types ZBBL for division 11 & ZDBL for division 12.
Whenever we do invoice with billing type ZBBL(manual entry) with reference to delivery for 12, system gives error message i.e. ZBBL can not be processed with division 12 & vice versa. This is OK .
But if we do VF01 for two delivery document one with division 11 & other with division 12-billing document ZBBL(manual entry) , system splits the invoces. It create two invoices. Again its a standard process.
So my problem is system is creating two different invoices , one for division 11 & other for 12-but with same billing type.
How can I make setting so that if system splits into two invoices ,it should create one invoice with ZBBL & other with ZDBL.
Please advise.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Dharminder dalal

There can be many reasons why your invoices with same sales area are getting split. It many based on:
- Billing type
- Billing date
- Payer
- Billing unit
- Terms of payment
- Incoterms
- Letter of credit
Further, if you want analysis, on what bases system is splitting these in invoice. Try following steps:
- Try using Tcode VF04. Opt for delivery related billing.
- Select the desired delivery docs in Billing due list. (Press Ctrl Key from keyboard to select multiple lines).
- Then click on simulation button.
- Billing Doc Simulate: Billing Doc Overview Screen
- Select all lines.
- There first go for Logs, by pressing Log button.
- If log is fine then, click on Split Analysis button to get split analysis.
For further reference on Invoice split. Refer SAP Note 11162 - Invoice split criteria in billing document
So, how to handle this?
Based on the split analysis amend your copying control for Delivery to Billing in TCode VTFL.
There many be a possibility that you might need to create customized routine with help of a tech consultant to suffice your requirement.
Also, refer link - multiple delivery but single invoice for reference/understanding.
Then to combine the billing. Follow following steps:
1. Use Tcode VF04. Opt for delivery related billing.
2. Select the desired delivery docs in Billing due list. (Press Ctrl Key from keyboard to select multiple lines).
3. Then click on Collective Billing button.
Regards
JP

Two Messages with same Message ID in SXMB_MONI

hi,
in moni,for a particular interface we found 2 messsages with the same message id.all the values in the columns are same exact for the column "Pipeline" which is having the values "CENTRAL" and "PE_ADAPTER" for these 2 messages.
there are no multiple receivers.one single receiver for this interface.
do you have any idea why we got 2 messages with same msg id even when receiver is single?
Regards,
Anu

Hi Anu,
In scenarios where you use Integration Process(BPM) leads to such situations where you have multiple entries for same message.
In your case CENTRAL is the pipeline on the Integration Server that actually performs the message processing and PE_ADAPTER is your process engine pipeline but MessageID is the same.
Also you can use the audit log from the runtime work bench (RWB) to look into the details of that particular message to get the relevant information about it.
Regards,
Jitender

Same message type

Hi,
is it possible to use the same message types in two different BPEL processes ?
If yes, could you show me an example ?
thank you & bye

Yes of course, just make sure the xsd's match. You can make sure the xsd's are the same in those BPEL processes by:
a) copy the .xsd's yourselves in each BPEL process (this violates the Edsger W. Dijkstra's design principle 'Avoid duplication of volatile information')
b) use a seperate BPEL process for storing all the common xsd's (unfortuately this requires that this process is deployed to the server before you can compile the other BPEL projects).
c) use svn:externals or a custom copy script that will make sure that there is only one source for the XSD's
The IT-eye article on Generate facade classes for multiple Oracle BPEL usertask payload structures at once might be usefull.
Regards,
PieterB

TS1424 Tried to use my apple id to update some apps and got"Connection Manager::invoke:: Failed to find service connection url" After this occured a few times I reset the id password, and this was confirmed by email. It still fails with same message. I

Tried to use my apple id to update some apps and got"Connection Manager::invoke:: Failed to find service connection url" After this occured a few times I reset the id password, and this was confirmed by email. It still fails with same message. Ideas?

Hi, you have to logout from your iTunes account and reconnect it:
Settings / iTunes & App Stores / ...
https://mobilfunkexperten.de/news/13450/sporadische-probleme-im-itunes-und-app-s tore
Hope this helps... :-)

Variable initialized with wrong message type

Hi,
I have a BPEL process variableA of Message type A as defined in the partnerlink WSDL file. This variable get initialized during operation A from the partnerlink. The WSDL has another message type B defined for another operation B.
During runtime when operation A is called variable A gets initialized with message type A, however when operation B is invoked with mesage type B variableA gets initialized again with the content of message type B even though it's defined to be of message type A. Below are the snippets from the WSDL and BPEL process file
WSDL file ..
<message name="MessageTypeA">
<part name="payload" element="mpx:MessageARequest"/>
</message>
<message name="MessageTypeB">
<part name="payload" element="mpx:MessageBRequest"/>
</message>
<portType name="MutilPort">
<operation name="A">
<input message="tns:MessageTypeA"/>
</operation>
<operation name="BA">
<input message="tns:MessageTypeB"/>
</operation>
</portType>
Process BPEL file
<variable name="VariableA"
messageType="tns1:MessageTypeA"/>
<variable name="VariableB"
messageType="tns1:MessageTypeB"/>
<pick name="Pick_2" createInstance="yes">
<onMessage portType="tns1:MutilPort" operation="square"
variable="VariableA" partnerLink="Multiplex">
<sequence name="Sequence_1">
<assign name="Assign_2">
<copy>
<from variable="VariableA" part="payload"
query="/ns1:MessageARequest/ns1:Operand1"/>
<to variable="ResponseVariable" part="payload"
query="/ns1:AllOpProcessResponse/ns1:Result1"/>
</copy>
</assign>
</sequence>
</onMessage>
<onMessage portType="tns1:MutilPort" operation="addition"
variable="VariableB" partnerLink="Multiplex">
<sequence name="Sequence_2">
<assign name="Assign_1">
<copy>
<from variable="VariableB" part="payload"
query="/ns1:MessageBRequest/ns1:Operand5"/>
<to variable="ResponseVariable" part="payload"
query="/ns1:AllOpProcessResponse/ns1:Result1"/>
</copy>
</assign>
</sequence>
</onMessage>
</pick>
Please can anyone shed some light on why and how this can happen and where is it going wrong.
Thanks,
Shishir

Looks like the destination which is used by your EG has default settings,
particulary the RedeliveryLimit param. If it is set to -1 (default setting)
WL will try to redeliver the message forever in case of any error. Just set
it to something else. You can also specify an ErrorDestination and hadle
error messages specifically in it.
Denis.
<Gunjan Shukla> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
Hi,
We are using WLI 8.1, in one of our applications I have a message broker
channel configured to listen to rawdata type messages. A jms event
generator is configured to publish messages, which are sent to a jms
topic, on this channel.
We have no control over type of messages sent by client applications, when
some client application sends an ObjectMessage instead of BytesMessage,
following error is thrown
####<Jun 1, 2006 10:47:14 AM GMT-07:00> <Error> <WLW> <P931467> <cgServer>
<ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<anonymous>>
<BEA1-004324CB0C4F26C12C0A> <000000> <Cannot publish non-BytesMessage to
channel of type RAWDATA>
####<Jun 1, 2006 10:47:14 AM GMT-07:00> <Error> <WLI-Core> <P931467>
<cgServer> <ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'>
<<anonymous>> <BEA1-004324CB0C4F26C12C0A> <BEA-489048> <Not a
BytesMessage>
server keeps throwing this exception and fills the logs and ultimately
server needs to be re-started.
Can somebody point me to whether its possible to catch these exceptions in
a process?
Or alternatively is it possible to somehow ignore the messages with
mismatched message type?
Any ideas are greatly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Gunjan

Using the same Message Type

Is it possible to use the same Message Type in several Message Interfaces?
I have BPM which is using AbstractInterface.
I created this interface based on my Message Type.
I have got mapping exeption. Maybe it is because of using the same message type.

> Is it possible to use the same Message Type in
> several Message Interfaces?
sure!
> I have got mapping exeption. Maybe it is because of
> using the same message type.
I don't think so.
Stefan

Multiple MHD with same message type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for