Variable initialized with wrong message type

Hi,
I have a BPEL process variableA of Message type A as defined in the partnerlink WSDL file. This variable get initialized during operation A from the partnerlink. The WSDL has another message type B defined for another operation B.
During runtime when operation A is called variable A gets initialized with message type A, however when operation B is invoked with mesage type B variableA gets initialized again with the content of message type B even though it's defined to be of message type A. Below are the snippets from the WSDL and BPEL process file
WSDL file ..
<message name="MessageTypeA">
<part name="payload" element="mpx:MessageARequest"/>
</message>
<message name="MessageTypeB">
<part name="payload" element="mpx:MessageBRequest"/>
</message>
<portType name="MutilPort">
<operation name="A">
<input message="tns:MessageTypeA"/>
</operation>
<operation name="BA">
<input message="tns:MessageTypeB"/>
</operation>
</portType>
Process BPEL file
<variable name="VariableA"
messageType="tns1:MessageTypeA"/>
<variable name="VariableB"
messageType="tns1:MessageTypeB"/>
<pick name="Pick_2" createInstance="yes">
<onMessage portType="tns1:MutilPort" operation="square"
variable="VariableA" partnerLink="Multiplex">
<sequence name="Sequence_1">
<assign name="Assign_2">
<copy>
<from variable="VariableA" part="payload"
query="/ns1:MessageARequest/ns1:Operand1"/>
<to variable="ResponseVariable" part="payload"
query="/ns1:AllOpProcessResponse/ns1:Result1"/>
</copy>
</assign>
</sequence>
</onMessage>
<onMessage portType="tns1:MutilPort" operation="addition"
variable="VariableB" partnerLink="Multiplex">
<sequence name="Sequence_2">
<assign name="Assign_1">
<copy>
<from variable="VariableB" part="payload"
query="/ns1:MessageBRequest/ns1:Operand5"/>
<to variable="ResponseVariable" part="payload"
query="/ns1:AllOpProcessResponse/ns1:Result1"/>
</copy>
</assign>
</sequence>
</onMessage>
</pick>
Please can anyone shed some light on why and how this can happen and where is it going wrong.
Thanks,
Shishir

Looks like the destination which is used by your EG has default settings,
particulary the RedeliveryLimit param. If it is set to -1 (default setting)
WL will try to redeliver the message forever in case of any error. Just set
it to something else. You can also specify an ErrorDestination and hadle
error messages specifically in it.
Denis.
<Gunjan Shukla> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
Hi,
We are using WLI 8.1, in one of our applications I have a message broker
channel configured to listen to rawdata type messages. A jms event
generator is configured to publish messages, which are sent to a jms
topic, on this channel.
We have no control over type of messages sent by client applications, when
some client application sends an ObjectMessage instead of BytesMessage,
following error is thrown
####<Jun 1, 2006 10:47:14 AM GMT-07:00> <Error> <WLW> <P931467> <cgServer>
<ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<anonymous>>
<BEA1-004324CB0C4F26C12C0A> <000000> <Cannot publish non-BytesMessage to
channel of type RAWDATA>
####<Jun 1, 2006 10:47:14 AM GMT-07:00> <Error> <WLI-Core> <P931467>
<cgServer> <ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default'>
<<anonymous>> <BEA1-004324CB0C4F26C12C0A> <BEA-489048> <Not a
BytesMessage>
server keeps throwing this exception and fills the logs and ultimately
server needs to be re-started.
Can somebody point me to whether its possible to catch these exceptions in
a process?
Or alternatively is it possible to somehow ignore the messages with
mismatched message type?
Any ideas are greatly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Gunjan

Similar Messages

  • [svn] 4136: Find loop variables initialized with "weak" types, e.g., NULL or VOID, and

    Revision: 4136
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-11-18 14:50:38 -0800 (Tue, 18 Nov 2008)
    Log Message:
    Find loop variables initialized with "weak" types, e.g., NULL or VOID, and
    use the variable type used within the loop to normalize the local's type.
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/asc/src/java/adobe/abc/GlobalOptimizer.java

    Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them.  This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

  • Wrong message type while sending response from TP

    Hi,
    We are simulating a scenario in which the host is sending a Rosetta over RNIF request to TP. The request is getting completed and acknowledgement is reaching the host properly.
    Now we are trying to send back a response from TP for the above request. But the following error is being observed:-
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Enter
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Enter
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Transaction.begin()
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Leave
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Action Name: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames Enter
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames tpitValue >>
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames Exit
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage All TPs list for broadcasting[]
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsgold.get_MSG_ID()>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011<
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsg.getMessageID() >G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011<
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) AQJMSCorrelationID = 91217C8567EB4A3EAC135BD382FD14E3
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsg.getMessageID()>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011<
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:884: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage msgIdFrmBkEnd>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011<
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (INFORMATION) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage Enter
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Enter
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Leave
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setFromPartyId() changing from null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setToPartyId() changing from null to TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from null to TPName: null Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage To TP NameBTGS
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage From TP NameCOMSTOR
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage business action name: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage doctype name: Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage doctype revision: V02.03.00
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:900: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage AppMsgIdG20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage ipmsg.get_MSG_TYPE = 1
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from TPName: null Type: null Value: null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine AQJMSCorrelationID = 91217C8567EB4A3EAC135BD382FD14E3
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage using appMsgId as b2bMsgId
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage B2B Message ID is G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage RefTo B2B Message ID is null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage isSignalMsg() == false; call outgoingTPA
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processOutgoingTPA() Begin TPA Processing..
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (before calling processParty) :
    initial : null
    from : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    to : TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
    final : null
    initiating : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() direction is outgoing
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() calling processparty with : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:915: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() Begin..
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() COMSTOR is hosted party
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() End..
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() after calling processparty with : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (after calling processParty):
    initial : null
    from : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    to : TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
    final : null
    initiating : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() docTypeName: Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation docTypeRevision: V02.03.00
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() actionName: PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction actionRevision: V02.03.00
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:931: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:getCollaborationDetails() Begin.. Activity Name : PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction Activity Version: V02.03.00
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:962: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setMode() changing from -1 to 2
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setMode() changing from 2 to 2
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setValidationEnabled() changing from null to false
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:addCollaborationDetails() End..
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() eventName:<PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction>
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() messageType:1
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() TPA Name : null
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier:identifyTPA() Begin..
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier:identifyTPA()
    From Party -> null-null-COMSTOR-Buyer To Party -> null-null-BTGS-Seller Collaboration -> 3A4
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) RepoDataAccessor:getAgreementName(partyNAMES) Begin..
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:561)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:216)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1041)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:561)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:216)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1041)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage B2BDomainException
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updating Error Message: Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:21:977: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Enter
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:008: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Wire message not found.
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:008: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Creating new b2berror object
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:008: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Updating business message error information
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Exit
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updating Native Event Tbl Row
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow Enter
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:
    ** DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow:tip_wireMsg wiremsg not found
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException notifying App
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine:notifyApp Enter
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Enqueue Engine AQJMSCorrelationID = 91217C8567EB4A3EAC135BD382FD14E3
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) notifyApp:notifyApp Enqueue the ip exception message:
    <Exception xmlns="http://integration.oracle.com/B2B/Exception" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <correlationId>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011</correlationId>
    <b2bMessageId>G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011</b2bMessageId>
    <errorCode>AIP-50501</errorCode>
    <errorText>Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate</errorText>
    <errorDescription>
    <![CDATA[Machine Info: (punin1879150941)
    Description: Unable to identify the trading partner agreement from the given input values. Also verify agreement effectiveToDate
    StackTrace:
    Error -:  AIP-50501:  Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:561)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:216)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1041)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    ]]>
    </errorDescription>
    <errorSeverity>2</errorSeverity>
    </Exception>
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:024: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) AQJMSCorrelationID = 91217C8567EB4A3EAC135BD382FD14E3
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:039: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine:notifyApp Exit
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:039: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updated the Error Message Successfully: Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:039: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Enter
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:055: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Transaction.commit()
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:055: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Leave
    2009.03.03 at 11:31:22:055: Thread-24: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Exit
    As it can be seen from the logs, the message type is being set to 1. However it should be 2 in case of response.
    The following header properties are being used in the AQ stub:-
    msgID = G20090303035936810.34565d:11fc706dc89:-7fbc@706519011
    from = COMSTOR
    to = BTGS
    doctypeName = Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation
    doctypeRevision = V02.03.00
    payload = Pip3A4_Response_POA10170020309.xml
    attachment =
    Can you please let us know the reason for the wrong message type being set?
    Regards,
    Ravi Shah

    Dheeraj,
    We have included msgType=2 as a part of the AQ header.
    The logs show that message type is getting set to 2 but still COMSTOR is Buyer and BTGS is Seller.
    Because of this, agreement look-up is getting failed.
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Transaction.begin()
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Leave
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Action Name: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Generic Wizard:getTradingPartnerNames Exit
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage All TPs list for broadcasting[]
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsgold.get_MSG_ID()>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011<
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsg.getMessageID() >G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011<
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) AQJMSCorrelationID = 72E9465AA77D4B70A1D1F327F359E819
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage ipmsg.getMessageID()>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011<
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage msgIdFrmBkEnd>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011<
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (INFORMATION) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext beginTransaction: Leave
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setFromPartyId() changing from null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setToPartyId() changing from null to TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from null to TPName: null Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage To TP NameBTGS
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage From TP NameCOMSTOR
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage business action name: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage doctype name: Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage doctype revision: V02.00
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage AppMsgIdG20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage ipmsg.get_MSG_TYPE = 2
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine AQJMSCorrelationID = 72E9465AA77D4B70A1D1F327F359E819
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage using appMsgId as b2bMsgId
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage B2B Message ID is G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage RefTo B2B Message ID is null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage isSignalMsg() == false; call outgoingTPA
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processOutgoingTPA() Begin TPA Processing..
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (before calling processParty) :
    initial : null
    from : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    to : TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
    final : null
    initiating : TPName: null Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() direction is outgoing
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() calling processparty with : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() Begin..
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() COMSTOR is hosted party
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:825: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:processParty() End..
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() after calling processparty with : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() PARTIES (after calling processParty):
    initial : null
    from : TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    to : TPName: BTGS Type: null Value: null
    final : null
    initiating : TPName: null Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() docTypeName: Pip3A4PurchaseOrderConfirmation docTypeRevision: V02.00
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() actionName: PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction actionRevision: V02.00
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:841: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:getCollaborationDetails() Begin.. Activity Name : PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction Activity Version: V02.00
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:856: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setMode() changing from -1 to 2
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setMode() changing from 2 to 2
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setValidationEnabled() changing from null to false
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor:addCollaborationDetails() End..
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() eventName:<PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction>
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() messageType:2
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) calling setInitiatingPartyId() changing from TPName: null Type: null Value: null to TPName: COMSTOR Type: null Value: null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() cpaID=null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() TPA Name : null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor:processTPA() TPA Name : null
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier:identifyTPA() Begin..
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier:identifyTPA()
    From Party -> null-null-COMSTOR-Buyer To Party -> null-null-BTGS-Seller Collaboration -> 3A4
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) RepoDataAccessor:getAgreementName(partyNAMES) Begin..
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:589)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:221)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1060)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:589)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:221)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1060)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processOutgoingMessage B2BDomainException
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updating Error Message: Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:872: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Wire message not found.
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:888: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Creating new business message
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:888: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow toparty name BTGS
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow toparty type and value nullnull
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow BusinessAction for the given name PurchaseOrderConfirmationAction BusinessAction_9516
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Creating new b2berror object
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Updating business message error information
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:updateWireBusinessToErrorState Exit
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updating Native Event Tbl Row
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:903: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:
    ** DbAccess:updateNativeEvtTblRow:tip_wireMsg wiremsg not found
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException notifying App
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine:notifyApp Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Enqueue Engine AQJMSCorrelationID = 72E9465AA77D4B70A1D1F327F359E819
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) notifyApp:notifyApp Enqueue the ip exception message:
    <Exception xmlns="http://integration.oracle.com/B2B/Exception" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <correlationId>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011</correlationId>
    <b2bMessageId>G20090304062204707.e44c79:11fcbe016e5:-7fdc@706519011</b2bMessageId>
    <errorCode>AIP-50501</errorCode>
    <errorText>Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate</errorText>
    <errorDescription>
    <![CDATA[Machine Info: (punin1879150986)
    Description: Unable to identify the trading partner agreement from the given input values. Also verify agreement effectiveToDate
    StackTrace:
    Error -:  AIP-50501:  Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.RepoDataAccessor.getAgreementName(RepoDataAccessor.java:2133)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAIdentifier.identifyTPA(TPAIdentifier.java:180)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processTPA(TPAProcessor.java:589)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.tpa.TPAProcessor.processOutgoingTPA(TPAProcessor.java:221)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processOutgoingMessage(Engine.java:1060)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:833)
         at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:400)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    ]]>
    </errorDescription>
    <errorSeverity>2</errorSeverity>
    </Exception>
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:919: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) AQJMSCorrelationID = 72E9465AA77D4B70A1D1F327F359E819
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) Engine:notifyApp Exit
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:handleOutboundException Updated the Error Message Successfully: Error -: AIP-50501: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party [NAME-ROLE] "COMSTOR-Buyer", To party [NAME-ROLE] "BTGS-Seller", Collaboration name "3A4"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Enter
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Transaction.commit()
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Leave
    2009.03.04 at 11:53:01:950: Thread-13: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:onMessage Exit
    Can you please look into this?
    Regards,
    Ravi Shah

  • LSMW with IDOC Message type COND_A and Basic type COND_A01

    Hi Sap All.
    in my project we using the LSMW with IDOC Message type COND_A and Basic type COND_A01 and now the requirement is to know the list of the tables which will be updated when i do the LSMW Migration with this IDOC Basic type.
    i have tried to know the list of the tables updated by entering into the transaction we30 and looking at the segments E1KOMG,E1KONH, E1KONP,E1KONM,E1KONW  and i found that the following below are the list of tables which gets updated when i populate the data into IDOC Message type COND_A and Basic type COND_A01.
    KOMG,KONH,KONP,KONM,KONW.
    please correct me if iam wrong.
    regards.
    Varma

    Hi Varma,
    The tables mentioned by you definitely get updated, i guess you can add KONV to the list too, but to be a 100% sure, enable SQL trace and process an IDOC. Then you can look for Insert/Modify/Update statements to get a list of the tables that get updated.
    Regards,
    Chen

  • Want to add multiple idoc type with single message type.

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a problem. I want to add multiple idoc type with single message type in WE20.
    How we can do this in WE20 or is there any other way to do that?
    Please help me.
    Thanks in advance.
    Srimanta.

    hi,
    basically in partner profile i.e. in we20 , we add details to the receiver / sender port that we have created using we21.
    so what exactly we do in that is that we first use the message type for those idocs that we have created.
    now based on those message type we create a process code. now this is the reason why you cannot apply several message types with the same name in we20... as process code is unque for each message type.
    so thats why you can only assign the same message name to several idocs in we82 and then in we20 define the process code for that message type.
    it will solve your problem.
    hope this will help you!!!
    Thanks & regards,
    punit raval.

  • How to send IDOC with extended message type MATMAS

    Hi Experts,
    I am looking for a solution to send open PR & open PO related data for diffrent materials through as IDCO in XML file.
    Scenario is i have to show a report in a 3rd party system for open PR & open PR that too will come after selection some materials. That means select a materials & it will show all the open PO & related data in a report.
    The rough idea for the solution i got is I can save the data in XML file in the system. For this i have to send IDOC. but the problem is there is no message type for PR. IF i am not wrong i can extend the MATMAS05 for a segment that will have PR related info.
    Now what to do with that how to send the IDOC do i need to create another report to send IDOC or i can send the extended one through BD10. I tried it but it shows error message "0 communication idoc sent" so I dont no y such error is coming i think i am not filling the extended idoc. But again my QUestion is how to do that.
    Can i use BAPI also for such work, if then how it can be helpful.
    If anyone have any other solution Please help me out of this.
    Regards,
    Nik

    Hi Mahesh,
    Thanks for your reply.
    My requirement is bit different. i have to send Open PR data for diffrent materials. In a 3rd party application user will search for few materials which will generate a report that will show the PR related data for those material.
    That means for few selected materials there will be few PR's which may be open, i have to show those in my report.
    Eg: material A, B. are in PR 00001 & material B, C in PR 00002.
    After selecting materials A to C report will show
    Material                 PR No                   Item No                Quantity
    A                           00001                    10                             1
    B                           00001                     20                            3
    B                           00002                     10                            3
    C                           00002                      10                           1
    Same thing i have to do for open PO & open Sales order also.
    Can u please help me to provide the solution how can i proceed for it. U have given the Message type & a bapi how it will help in my issue?
    I got a suggesion from someone that extend message type matmas for PR, PO, SD related data & send the idoc. but i am confused how to pass that much data ina single IDOC.
    Regards,
    Nik

  • Inbound IDOC error :51 Passed with out Message Type to ALE Layer

    Hi,
    I am struct wtih the inbound IDOC scenario ..XI able to send IDOC but at ECC side it is in 51 red status and the error message is
    "IDOC passed without Message type to ALE Layer"
    Do I need to pass these segment values in Message Mapping? I didnt mapped any MESTYP,SNDPOR,SNDPRT and so on.. disabled these fields...
    Could any one light on this issue?
    Thanks
    Rajeev

    >
    rajeev raj wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I am passing values in MM as below:
    >
    > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    > <ZPORDCR01>
    > <IDOC BEGIN="Constant">
    > <EDI_DC40 SEMENT="Constant">
    > <TABNAM>Constant</TABNAM>
    > <DIRECT>Constant</DIRECT>
    > <IDOCTYP>ZOrders</IDOCTYP>
    > <CIMTYP>Constant</CIMTYP>
    > <MESTYP>Z_Orders</MESTYP>
    > <SNDPOR>B0009</SNDPOR>
    > <SNDPRT>LS</SNDPRT>
    > <SNDPFC>LS</SNDPFC>
    > <SNDPRN>PD_100</SNDPRN>
    > <RCVPOR>DEV</RCVPOR>
    > <RCVPRT>LS</RCVPRT>
    > <RCVPRN>Dev10</RCVPRN>
    > <REFINT>GB</REFINT>
    > <REFGRP>MTI</REFGRP>
    > <REFMES></REFMES>
    > <ARCKEY>20090909</ARCKEY>
    > </EDI_DC40>
    > <E1PORDCR SEGMENT="Constant">
    >
    > I am forwarding these values in MM... IDOC is successfully reaching in ECC but with 51 error in red... Logical system, post and message types are avaliable in Control record of the IDOC which received wiht errors in ECC.
    >
    > Thnaks
    > Rajeev
    Fill the TABNAME as EDI_DC40 and Direct as 2 (represents the inbound direction) and resend the idoc and check
    Rajesh

  • IDOC - IDOC scenario with different message types

    Dear Experts
    I will like to have your expert opinion in the following question:
    I have an IDOC -> IDOC scenario. Wherein at the destination system I have a message type which does not exist at the source system.
    Also the IDOC type at destination system does not exist at the source system.
    Let say, I will be creating custom message type at source system (Z****) and will also be creating the custom IDOC type (z****) with the same structure, definition as the destination.
    Now my question is, even if there will be different message types and different IDOC types but with the same structure (the segment level definition
    and field attribute remains the same at both the system). The difference lies with the names. And I have proper mapping though process code.
    Will I be able to receive the IDOC correctly at destination?
    Thanks & Best Regards

    Hi All
    I figured out the answer myself now.
    You got to have same name for message type. All of you said this and this is rite.
    Coming to IDOC type, I did not really got clear idea on this from this discussion.
    But after working on a scenario, I learnt that, you can have different names for IDOCs, but provided that, whichever IDOC type the source system is sending, the same type must exist in your destination as well. Otherwise, system wont process your IDOC. But from mapping point of view, its upto individual how do thay handle mapping inside inbound process code for different idoc types / strucutes.
    Lesson learnt by me, ideally try to keep same name for both logical message and idoc type at both source and destination. If possible try to keep the structure level also the same. This is my view, learnt it the hard way.
    Cheers
    Shane

  • Idoc ORDERS05 with Custom Message Type

    We want to use a Z message type for idoc type ORDERS05 to be able to separate a particular group of partners from other partners using ORDERS/ORDERS05.
    The goal with our Z message type is to use the standard function IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDERS. The only problem I see is that this function checks the message type in form READ_SERVICE_PACKAGE. It would ignore this code since my message type is a Z and it's checking for message type ORDERS. 
    I was thinking of using a Z wrap-around function to perform the same code in form READ_SERVICE_PACKAGE if the message type is my Z message type.
    I want to avoid creating a Z copy of IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDERS and all if the includes!!!
    Any suggestions?

    Hello Bruce,
    The function module is associated with the process code.
    Why do you need a new message type?
    Regards,
    Samir.

  • Multiple files (with same message type) into a single file

    Dear All,
    I am having multiple files(same message type) with details like header data and its line item details in each file. The structure of all the files will be:
    File1    File2   File3
    H1        H2      H3
    L1         L1      L1
    L2        
    L3
    Now my requirement is that after every 10 hours all the files should be picked and merged (append) into a single file as target file. The structure of output file will be now like
    H1
    L1
    L2
    L3
    H2
    L1
    H3
    L1
    Kindly guide on how to proceed on this with BPM or without BPM
    Regards,
    NJ

    Now my requirement is that after every 10 hours all the files should be picked and merged
    (append) into a single file as target file.
    Check the use of "Availability Time Planning" of the adapter in your case
    /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/11/26/adapter-scheduling--hail-sp-19-
    If your requirement is to append you can do so by using the File Construction mode as Append in receiver File adapter
    If your req is to do a N:1 mapping (i.e. merger) then develop a mapping program accordingly...
    Regards,
    Abhishek.
    Edited by: abhishek salvi on Jun 3, 2009 10:30 AM

  • Contract creation in Backend with Idoc message type BLAORD

    Hello,
    We are creating Backend contracts from the Bidding engine functionality. We only want to create backend contracts and did the necesary configuration.
    We activated BADI: BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
    Method CONTRACT_LOGSYS_DETERMINE.
    We did not yet implement BADI:
    BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE in SRM 5.0
    In SAP R/3 Backend system (Version 46C) we see SAP is trying to create a contract via Idoc message Type: BLAORD.
    In the trx BD87 in the backend we get status 51 :
    Mesage number: 00 055
    "Make an entry in all required fields"
    In the segments of the Idoc however we do not see which field is missing!
    How can we best analise this problem. Or maybe anyone can give us a a hint what is missing.
    Thanks for any reply.
    Aart

    Hello RRK,
    In ref. to your mentioning to change the backend configuration from WKK to MKK might not be as easy to do for organizations.  As those configurations effect the overall creation of purchasing document types in R/3. 
    The Key issue is why the "Target Value" in the Header of the SRM GOA does not get transferred to the R/3 contract.  That's why the issue is still there. 
    Were you guys able to figure out why that was missing? In the BLAORD IDoc the Target Value seems to not get transferred from SRM - its 0.00 if the IDoc is reviewed in WE19.  This seems to be the problem.
    Just wanted to know if you see the same issue in ur system.
    Thanks.
    Sunny.

  • Automizing error message with Fault Message Type

    (Request F6)  (Request F6)
    System -
    > XI -
    >        SAP (Doesn't have F6)
              <-- XI <--
          SAP (Doesn't have F6)
       (Respons: error)    (Respons. error)
    (Problem) When the request message doesn't content sufficient information that is required for respons then the XI team will get the message error and the responsibility to solve the problem. In this scenario it is the XI team that sends the error respons to the System.
    (Request (eg. F6) )  (Request (eg. F6))
    System -
    > XI -
    >        SAP (Doesn't have F6)
              <-- XI <--
          SAP (Doesn't have F6)
       (Respons: error)    (Respons. error)
    (Solution) We want to automatize the process so that the error message goes directly to the System via XI. In other words we only want an acknowledgment of the error in XI, we don't want to solve the error since we believe that it is the sender System that is responsible.
    We have seen that there is a Fault Message Type in the Message Interface and we are wondering if that is the way to do it? And it that case, how?

    Hi,
    Fault message is a error meesage. Its like an exception in simple terms. The fault message is used to
    store a log for application error. Fault messages is defined in IR.
    To give a overview on Fault messages it is mostly used in synchronous communication. When an error
    occurs at the inbound side instead of sending the response message back it sends a fault message back
    to the sender system to handle error.
    Fault Message are Msg type that provided whenever u create a namespace..they are usually used to get
    the exception or error mapped which has occured while execution of Application at the sender/receiver
    end....
    One scenario where i had used it from Soap to RFC where i defined the exception in rfc source code at
    r/3 end...I mapped that exception to Fault msg type that i created of my own type(didnt used the
    default)..
    Fault messages are used to propogate / send back the error message to the calling application. This is
    used when there is a failure and the sending system needs to know what the error was. This is more of
    catching Application Errors
    check this nice blog also
    /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/11/02/fault-message-types--a-demo-part-1
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/5d/a45c3cff8ca92be10000000a114084/content.htm
    Asynchronus RFC  exception handling
    XI Alerts are not getting triggered from proxy servers
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ee5bc490-0201-0010-e9b5-
    a258cf083bca
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2006/01/16/xi-propagation-of-meaningful-error-information-to-soap-client
    Fault Message
    Regards
    Seshagiri
    Edited by: N V Seshagiri on Feb 29, 2008 12:19 PM

  • Exception handling with fault message type not working

    Hi,
    I have a sync proxy to proxy scenario and I have created a fault MT and specified in the outbound and Inbound service interface...
    *In Inbound proxy I have the following code--*......
    RAISE EXCEPTION TYPE z_cx_test_fault
    EXPORTING
    standard = l_standard_data.
    In the sender side abap code which calls the outbound proxy I have the follwing code -
    CATCH cx_ai_system_fault INTO lo_cx_ai_system_fault.
    txt = lo_cx_ai_system_fault->get_text( ).
    WRITE txt.
    CATCH z_cx_test_fault INTO lo_cx_test_fault.
    txt = lo_cx_standard_message_fault->get_text( ).
    WRITE txt.
    CATCH cx_ai_application_fault INTO lo_cx_ai_application_fault.
    txt = lo_cx_ai_application_fault->get_text( ).
    WRITE txt.
    when i test the inbound proxy separately I get the custom fault message properly...
    however when i run the proxy to proxy sync scenario and the custom exceptionz_cx_test_fault  is raised inside the receiver proxy .......control goes to CATCH cx_ai_application_fault    and not CATCH  z_cx_test_fault .
    I understand that cx_ai_application_fault is the super class of all the exception class but why does control go to its exception handling when a custom exception is raised...
    Edited by: hema T on Feb 26, 2012 1:16 PM
    Edited by: hema T on Feb 26, 2012 1:17 PM

    Hi
    I tried changing the sequence also but it did not work...
    I can see an appropriate response coming from the receiver in SXMB_MONI of PI...this response has the "fault response "
    "fault detail" data that I want.....however when the control goes to the sender why does it go to CATCH CX_AI_APPLICATION_FAULT and not not my CATCH z_cx_test_fault .
    My observation - If I change the scenario to SOAP to Proxy sync..then the sender SOAP client gets the appropriate custom fault message back.
    Edited by: hema T on Feb 27, 2012 1:17 PM
    Edited by: hema T on Feb 27, 2012 1:17 PM

  • Multiple MHD with same message type

    Hi,
    Can seeburger handle the following Tradacom EDI standards
    MHD: ORDHDR
    MHD:ORDHDR
    Is it normally allowed for seeburger to do such a mapping.  I believe that any normal EDI file should have only one MHD:order header file with orders.
    Regards
    Krish

    Now my requirement is that after every 10 hours all the files should be picked and merged
    (append) into a single file as target file.
    Check the use of "Availability Time Planning" of the adapter in your case
    /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/11/26/adapter-scheduling--hail-sp-19-
    If your requirement is to append you can do so by using the File Construction mode as Append in receiver File adapter
    If your req is to do a N:1 mapping (i.e. merger) then develop a mapping program accordingly...
    Regards,
    Abhishek.
    Edited by: abhishek salvi on Jun 3, 2009 10:30 AM

  • Message interface with two types of message types

    Hi experts,
    I am having problem that a proxy cannot be generated because  of the (mixed) types of the message types that the interface is using.
    The first message type is defined in the repository and another is defined as an external definition, imported in from an outside source.
    Here is the SAP message I received when I tried to generate the proxy for this interface.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Interface uses external and internal message definitions
    Message no. SPRX122
    Diagnosis
    In a message interface you can use messages from different sources:
    1. Message types and fault message types edited in the Integration Repository
    2. Messages imported into the Integration Repository (external definitions, RFC, IDoc)
    In the current message interface, message types from different sources have been used.
    Since messages from these different sources must be handled differently during proxy generation, such a mixture of messages within a message interface is not possible.
    System Response
    The interface cannot be generated.
    Procedure
    Change the interface definition accordingly in the Integration Repository.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    The imported xsd is quite large and also contain many large includes. I don't have the option of creating the message type manually.
    Any suggestions?
    Thank you,
    -michelle

    Hi all,
    I tried several things and the problem is still not resolved. This is what I learned.
    First of all, I believed the SAP message about mixing of internal and external message is misleading or even wrong. I tried with both message types being external but I still get the same message that the interface has one internal and the other external message type.
    Secondly, since Arvind suggested that I might have used an xml element that is not currently supported by ABAP proxy, I then change to another definition with the most simplest elements. I then attached this other definition to the interface and tried generating the proxy again. I still get the same system message that I am using mixing of message types in one interface.
    My conclusion is XI still is not capable of generating ABAP proxy from external definition.
    Does anyone have any comments/suggestion/experience on this issue?
    Best regards,
    -michelle

Maybe you are looking for

  • Some users on 8.1 Pro can't right click desktop

    When on desktop, some users cannot right click on start and get menu, nor right click on anything, yet others can. This is on same desktop since I have roaming users. However, they can on other pc's. All are new Lenovo all-in-one machines with all up

  • Print delay

    My printer gives printing response with too much delay, and some time shows no reponse at all. Print out of files (specially scanned images) comes with a long delay.

  • Error when downloading apps

    Whenever I try to download or update an app from the marketplace, I get an error message saying "error: cannot install on USB device or SD card" I don't believe it is due to memory issues, since I have 5.26 GB available on the SD card and 6.02 GB ava

  • Why can't I get AU Lab and Soundflower to record anything on my Mac Pro!

    (Please be patient, I really apreciate your time and input!) I have been (and I am) recording for years with logic audio and a lot of other recording aplications which I own. I started experimenting with AU Lab. Although I am very good at figuering o

  • Cannot import my address book from Outlook

    There is no "Import" alternative om my Mail other then "Import mailboxes". Even if I open my Address Book, can´t find any help. I exported the file from Outlook and it is there, just waiting. Any ideas?