Multiple root in Orgchart

Dear All,
Is it possible when the user belongs to 2 orgunits or more to have a virtual orgunit root and under this the user will have his root orgunits?
Now when I implemented the dynamic rooting for user. it shows the root object as the first orgunit the user belongs to. and discared the second one.
Best regards

Hi Ibrahim,
I have been thinking about this and struggle to think how it can be done in Live. There are 2 issues to consider:
1. HR-OCI returns an entire structure as XML so if you can add the dummy root objects, these will show up in the structure for other users to see.
2. The user authentication object needs to have the dummy object ID in it as the starting point. As this would be derived by a function module in the HR-OCI configuration it would not be available in a SAP table to be added to the object.
For what purposes are you performing this task? Maybe we can find a functional solution that might work.
Best regards,
Luke

Similar Messages

RegionRenderer encodeAll The region component with id: pt1:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components. Fragments with more than one root component may not display correctly in a region and may have a negative impact on performance.

Hi,
I am using JDEV 11.1.2.1.0
I am getting the following error :-
<RegionRenderer> <encodeAll> The region component with id: pt1:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components. Fragments with more than one root component may not display correctly in a region and may have a negative impact on performance. It is recommended that you restructure the page fragment to have a single root component.
Piece of code is for region is:-
   <f:facet name="second">
                                            <af:panelStretchLayout id="pa1"
                                                                   binding="#{backingBeanScope.Assign.pa1}">
                                                <f:facet name="center">
                                                    <af:region value="#{bindings.tfdAssignGraph1.regionModel}" id="r1"
                                                               binding="#{backingBeanScope.Assign.r1}"/>
                                                </f:facet>
                                            </af:panelStretchLayout>
                                        </f:facet>
How do I resolve it ?
Thanks,

Hi,
I see at least 3 errors
1. <RegionRenderer> <encodeAll> The region component with id: pt1:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components.
the page fragment should only have a single component under the jsp:root tag. If you see more than one, wrap them in e.g. an af:panelGroupLayout or af:group component
2. SAPFunction.jspx/.xml" has an invalid character ".".
check the document (you can open it in JDeveloper if the customization was a seeded one. Seems that editing this file smething has gone bad
3. The expression "#{bindings..regionModel}" (that was specified for the RegionModel "value" attribute of the region component with id "pePanel") evaluated to null.
"pageeditorpanel" does seem to be missing in the PageDef file of the page holding the region
Frank

Multiple Root elements in the XSD Schema

Hi Dear MDM gurus,
I have manually created an XSD Schema and I can import it in the Syndicator without any problem.
I have 3 different Root elements in the schema that I want to use and map to the corresponding table of this type.
In my Syndicator screen in the Rood dropdown box I can see all three of the Root elements that I have in the schema.
If I select the first Root element - everything goes fine and I can do my mapping, save the map, etc.
The problem is that if I select the second or third root element to do the mapping for them, the syndicator does not show the structure in the Item Mapping after that.
I tried moving the Second root element of the schema and make it first and it works with it, but then the other two are not appearing and I have the same issue.
Does MDM support only one Root element in the Schema? If that's the case, why does it show all three of them in the dropdown?
Here is an example:
1. If I have them in this order in my XSD
          <xs:element name="ManufacturerGroupNumber" type="ManufacturerGroupNumbers"/>
          <xs:element name="SupplierGroupNumber" type="SupplierGroupNumbers"/>
          <xs:element name="SupplierLocationNumber" type="Suppliers"/>
I can only see the structure when I select the "ManufacturerGroupNumber".
2. If I have them in the Schema in this order
          <xs:element name="SupplierLocationNumber" type="Suppliers"/>
          <xs:element name="SupplierGroupNumber" type="SupplierGroupNumbers"/>
          <xs:element name="ManufacturerGroupNumber" type="ManufacturerGroupNumbers"/>
I can only see the structure when I select the first one again "SupplierLocationNumber" and I can only do the mapping for it.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Boris

Hello Satish,
Thank you for your quick response.
I read some of the architectural approaches and XML specifications and depending on your design, you may have only one Root element or in rare cases Several Root elements. In my case, I was advised by our PI experts to use Multiple Root elements and this gives me the following:
Advantages:
u2022 The reusability of the schema definition is available for all types and all elements defined in the global namespace.
Disadvantages:
u2022 Since there are many global elements, there are many valid XML documents.
I initially had the schema as you suggested, but they didn't like it in PI and advised me to change it with having multiple roots.
What I'm trying to figure out is if there is a bug in MDM that does not allow to use the rest of the root elements, so I can open an OSS message.
Thanks,
Boris

MDS Customization Problem with multiple root components

Hello,
Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.1.5.0 and WebLogic Server Version: 10.3.5.0
I am using Oracle MDS Customization class with the following classes:
oracle.adf.view.rich.change.MDSDocumentChangeManager
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.change.ChangeManager
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.change.MoveChildComponentChange
Based on these classes I am moving UI components
<af:panelStretchLayout>
<f:facet name="center">
<af:region />
</f:facet>
</af:panelStretchLayout>
into another component thanks to the MDS.
Once I do the movement and persist, I receive the following waning message:
*<RegionRenderer> <encodeAll> The region component with id: pt1:r1:0:pt2:r1:0:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components. Fragments with more than one root component may not display correctly in a region and may have a negative impact on performance. It is recommended that you restructure the page fragment to have a single root component.*
When I run the application in Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.1.5.0, it work fine, but when I deploy it on WebLogic Server Version: 10.3.5.0 it is not working.
I receive the same warning message on the server and in JDeveloper.
I think that MDS makes a copy of the components that I move because of that it says me that "a page fragment with multiple root components"
The problem is not because of duplication any of the tags <af:document> <f:view><f:form> <html> <head> <body>
After the movement and persistence, I also call the FacesContext to reset its view root with the following code:
FacesContext context =FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
String currentView = context.getViewRoot().getViewId();
ViewHandler vh = context.getApplication().getViewHandler();
UIViewRoot x = vh.createView(context, currentView);
x.setViewId(currentView);
context.setViewRoot(x);
The idea is that the entire JSF tree to be rebuild on entering page with aim to clear previously drag and drop settings.
Do you know how I can overcome the problem on the server WebLogic Server Version: 10.3.5.0?
This worked on Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.1.3.0 and now the problem is with Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.1.5.0.
Regards,
Niki

Hi,
what the error means is that you have more than one node under the jsp:root node of the fragment. Say the content of your fragment is
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl1">
</af:PanelGrouPLayout>
Then this is okay
if you have
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl1">
</af:PanelGrouPLayout>
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl2">
</af:PanelGrouPLayout>
or
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl1">
</af:PanelGrouPLayout>
<af:commandButton id="cb1"/>
Then these mean duplicated root components. The JDeveloper IDE flags this as Warnings (Structure Window) when selecting the page fragment
Frank

"detected a page fragment with multiple root components" warning

I am getting a warning on the standalone WLS when I run my page that contains a taskflow as region. I am using a page fragment in my taskflow.
<Warning> <oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.rich.RegionRenderer> <ADF_FACES-60099> <The region component with id: ptMain:r1 has detected a page fragment with multiple root components. Fragments with more than one root component may not display correctly in a region and may have a negative impact on performance. It is recommended that you restructure the page fragment to have a single root component.>
The warning states the obvious, I have everything within a panelheader in my page fragment. Also, I do not get the warning on the integrated WLS. Any ideas as to why this warning is still popping up in the log? I am using JDev 11.1.1.3.
Thanks,
Jessica

Thank you for responding. I do not have any popups. I do, however, have another region nested within this fragment ( have this warning on another fragment that doesn't have a nested region though). Here is the code for my fragment.
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" version="2.1"
xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich"
xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core">
<af:panelHeader text="Pawn"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.ph1}"
id="ph1" type="default">
<af:panelFormLayout id="pfl2">
<af:panelSplitter binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.ps1}"
id="ps1" orientation="vertical" splitterPosition="62"
inlineStyle="width:775px; height:660px;">
<f:facet name="first">
<af:panelBox text="Search #{bindings.agency.inputValue} Data to Update"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.pb1}"
id="pb1">
<f:facet name="toolbar"/>
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pgl3" layout="horizontal">
<af:inputText value="#{bindings.control_number.inputValue}"
label="Control Number" required="true"
columns="#{bindings.control_number.hints.displayWidth}"
maximumLength="#{bindings.control_number.hints.precision}"
shortDesc="#{bindings.control_number.hints.tooltip}"
id="it1">
<f:validator binding="#{bindings.control_number.validator}"/>
</af:inputText>
<af:inputDate value="#{bindings.trans_date.inputValue}"
label="Date" required="true"
shortDesc="#{bindings.trans_date.hints.tooltip}"
id="id1">
<f:validator binding="#{bindings.trans_date.validator}"/>
<af:convertDateTime pattern="#{bindings.trans_date.format}"/>
</af:inputDate>
<af:inputText value="#{bindings.agency.inputValue}" simple="true"
required="#{bindings.agency.hints.mandatory}"
columns="#{bindings.agency.hints.displayWidth}"
maximumLength="#{bindings.agency.hints.precision}"
shortDesc="#{bindings.agency.hints.tooltip}"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.it2}"
id="it2" visible="false">
<f:validator binding="#{bindings.agency.validator}"/>
</af:inputText>
<af:commandButton actionListener="#{bindings.ExecuteWithParams.execute}"
text="Search"
disabled="#{!bindings.ExecuteWithParams.enabled}"
id="cb5"
returnListener="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.refreshPage}"
action="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.RenderMe}">
<af:setActionListener from="#{bindings.PawnItemView1Iterator.currentRowKeyString}"
to="#{requestScope.pawnkey}"/>
</af:commandButton>
<af:spacer width="10" height="10"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.s1}"
id="s1"/>
<af:goButton text="Clear Values and Create New" id="gb1"
destination="index.jspx"
rendered="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.saveButtonRendered}"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</af:panelBox>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="second">
<af:panelGroupLayout binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.pgl4}"
id="pgl4" layout="scroll" partialTriggers=""
visible="true">
<af:panelGroupLayout binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.pgl6}"
id="pgl6" inlineStyle="width:775px;"
visible="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.renderTF}">
<af:region value="#{bindings.PawnEntryFormTF1.regionModel}"
id="r1" inlineStyle="width:750px;"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
<af:panelGroupLayout binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.pgl5}"
id="pgl5" layout="horizontal"
visible="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.renderMessage}">
<af:outputFormatted value="No #{bindings.agency.inputValue} Pawn data matching the Control Number and Transaction Date from above."
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.of1}"
id="of1"
inlineStyle="font-weight:bolder; font-size:small;"/>
<af:spacer width="10" height="10"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.s2}"
id="s2"/>
<af:goButton text="Clear Search and Start Again"
binding="#{backingBeanScope.backing_Fragments_PawnSearch.gb2}"
id="gb2" destination="index.jspx"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</f:facet>
</af:panelSplitter>
</af:panelFormLayout>
</af:panelHeader>

</jsp:root>

Create multiple root in a JTree??????very urgent..pl

hello
i have a jtree which takes a defaultMutableTreenode as its parameter.
My problem is that i have to create multiple root.
and what i get with this is a single root at the top.
what is the solution for creating multiple roots in a jtree.
pl. help its very urgent
thanx
hussain

Hello Hussain,
I found in the sourcecode of JTree the following constructor which might is be helpful for you:
* Returns a <code>JTree</code> with each element of the specified
* <code>Vector</code> as the
* child of a new root node which is not displayed. By default, the
* tree defines a leaf node as any node without children.
* @param value a <code>Vector</code>
* @return a <code>JTree</code> with the contents of the
* <code>Vector</code> as children of the root node
* @see DefaultTreeModel#asksAllowsChildren
public JTree(Vector value) {
this(createTreeModel(value));
this.setRootVisible(false);
this.setShowsRootHandles(true);
Greetings
Helmut

Hierarchical query with multiple roots

Hi,
I'm trying to write a sql query to find blocking lock in database. The idea is to get the blocker in 1st column, comma separated list of waiters in 2nd column and number of waiters in 3rd column.
As of now i use below query to get a tree structure
WITH lk AS
     (SELECT blocking_session||' (Inst-'||blocking_instance || ')' blocker,
             SID||' (Inst-'||inst_id || ')' waiter
        FROM gv$session
       WHERE blocking_instance IS NOT NULL AND blocking_session IS NOT NULL)
SELECT     LPAD (' ', 2 * (LEVEL - 1)) || waiter lock_tree
      FROM (SELECT *
              FROM lk
            UNION ALL
            SELECT DISTINCT 'root', blocker
                       FROM lk
                      WHERE blocker NOT IN (SELECT waiter
                                              FROM lk))
CONNECT BY PRIOR waiter = blocker
START WITH blocker = 'root';
Result:-
===========
LOCK_TREE
1966 (Inst-1)
908 (Inst-1)
1906 (Inst-1)
1900 (Inst-1)
981 (Inst-1)
921 (Inst-1)
937 (Inst-1)
962 (Inst-1)
1889 (Inst-1)
1904 (Inst-1)
974 (Inst-1) But what i expect is like below. My below query works when there is only one root blocker, but fails when there are multiple root node.
WITH lk AS
     (SELECT blocking_session || '(Inst-' || blocking_instance || ')' blocker,
             SID || '(Inst-' || inst_id || ')' waiter
        FROM gv$session
       WHERE blocking_instance IS NOT NULL AND blocking_session IS NOT NULL)
SELECT     blocker, SUBSTR (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (waiter, ';'), 2) waiters
      FROM (SELECT   blocker, waiter, ROW_NUMBER () OVER (ORDER BY waiter)
                                                                          val
                FROM lk
            GROUP BY blocker, waiter)
     WHERE CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF = 1
START WITH val = 1
CONNECT BY PRIOR val = val - 1
Result:-
===========
WAITERS# BLOCKER                                                                                 WAITERS
         3 981(Inst-1)                                                                             1904(Inst-1);921(Inst-1);937(Inst-1)
....lot of duplicates
expected result:-
===========
WAITERS# BLOCKER                                                                                 WAITERS
         4 981(Inst-1)                                                                             1904(Inst-1);921(Inst-1);937(Inst-1);974(Inst-1)
         3 1966(Inst-1)                                                                             908 (Inst-1);1906 (Inst-1);1900 (Inst-1) can you please help me correct above query or suggest other ways to archive this result.
Thanks in advance
MidhunGT

Hi All,
Thank you all for your support. I never knew these many ways to see blocking lock in database :)
Somehow i was able get the desired result for my specific requirement with below query
sql> WITH lk AS
2       (SELECT blocking_session || ' (Inst-' || blocking_instance
3               || ')' blocker,
4               SID || ' (Inst-' || inst_id || ')' waiter
5          FROM gv$session
6         WHERE blocking_instance IS NOT NULL AND blocking_session IS NOT NULL)
7 SELECT     blocker,
8             LTRIM
9                (MAX (SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (waiter, ','))KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY cnt),
10                 ','
11                ) AS waiters,
12             MAX (cnt) waiters#
13        FROM (SELECT blocker, waiter,
14                     ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION BY blocker ORDER BY waiter)
15                                                                         AS cnt
16                FROM lk)
17    GROUP BY blocker
18 CONNECT BY cnt - 1 = PRIOR cnt AND blocker = PRIOR blocker
19 START WITH cnt = 1;
BLOCKER         WAITERS                                                                            WAITERS#
1946 (Inst-1)   1987 (Inst-1),879 (Inst-1),910 (Inst-1)                                                3
930 (Inst-1)    1919 (Inst-1),1945 (Inst-1),1953 (Inst-1),1983 (Inst-1)                                4please advice, if any scope for improvement
Thanks and Regards,
MidhunGT

Read XML response with multiple root elements

Hi ,
I am trying to achieve the below scenario but unable to do so.Please help urgently.
I am getting a response from a service which has multiple root elements.these root elements can change at runtime..I need to read the different root elements and extract data from its sub elements.
Regards...
Hoping for an anwser..

i assume on runtime the service just returns 1 rootnode, but this rootnode can change
you could use a switch after the invoke
if $response/myroot1
assign $response/myroot to myroot1_var
if $response/myroot2
assign $response/myroot to myroot2_var
etc
so you check what's in the root node before you assign to you temp variable
or if you have logic which is specific based on this root nod you can just implement all these branches in the switch and execute logic in there based on the selected rootnode
several implementations are possible

PCO 2.1 Error : there are multiple root elements Line 6, position 2

HI all,
I am getting an error while adding Destination for Notification.
On the Destination Tab, I am able to create MII System as Destination. And expanding the newly created Destination, i can see a child node 'Destination'. While clicking on this child node, i am getting an error as "there are multiple root elements Line 6, position 2"
Can anybody please help.
Regards
Muzammil

Hi,
While configuring MII Server details, instead of IP address of MII server, we gave domain name and it started working.
Regards
Muzammil

Error in WebServices Consumption - There are multiple root elements

hi,
I am working on consuming webservice which has a WSDL to get the RouteDetails with a structure like:
<Source>
<HouseNumber>1</HouseNumber>
<Street>XYZ</Street>
<City>Hyderabad</City>
<Country>India</Country>
<PostalCode>500018</PostalCode>
</Source>
<Destination>
<HouseNumber>2</HouseNumber>
<Street>X1Y1Z1</Street>
<City>Bangalore</City>
<Country>India</Country>
<PostalCode>500067</PostalCode>
</Destination>
When I am calling the method RouteDetails of the proxy I created, I am getting the error 'There are multiple root elements in line 1 column 178 and the column is indicating <HouseNumber> in <Destination> node.
Please let me know how to overcome this.
Thanks for the help
Githa

Its now resolved. Thanks,
Githa

How to create multiple root node in a tree

Hi Experts,
As per my requirement I have two requirements for tree creation:
1) Create a Tree which can display multiple root node.
2) Cretae a Tree which can display data directy without any folder.
I am new in Tree development.
Can any body help me out to get it done.
If it is not possible then also i need a confirmation from experts.
Regards,
Madhu

use method add_node of the class Cl_gui_alv_tree to add a node to the tree.
In case of root node the parameter lv_relat_key is passed as blank.In order to create further child nodes pass the node key of the parent as the relat key of the child and use the method again.
Regards,
Abhi

OT: question about multiple root directories

ok, so on this website i just transferred to a new host, i
password
protected a directory, and for many people (possibly
everyone) it is
asking for the login info twice or three times before it lets
you in. i
contacted the host tech support, who gave me an explanation
that i don't
think makes sense. or maybe it does, but i don't think
applies to my
problem. and even if it does, they didn't offer any advice on
how to
solve the problem, just what might be causing it. bad tech
support.
anyway, i had a different idea about what the might be. there
are two
root directories on the server: public_html and www. they
both have the
same files, and therefore my protected directory is protected
in both
places. to me, that seems like it could be why it's asking
for login
info more than once.
so, i want to find out if this is the case by deleting the
one i'm not
uploading to. so basically, my question is, if i have chosen
public_html
as the directory that i upload to, is it safe to delete the
www
directory? or is there a reason that i need two root
directories and,
essentially, two copies of my site on the server?
i realize these are probably questions best suited for my
host, but i'm
unimpressed with their tech support so far (though i like
everything
else about them), and i'm confident that someone here will be
able to
answer this question for me.
thanks!

ok, well that's good to know! thanks.
also, i changed my mind about the tech support response.
here's what he
said:
Typically when you are seeing multiple login prompts like
what you
describe it has to do with content/site linking.
Here is a rather wordy explanation:
When entering a password-protected web site for the first
time, you
will occasionally notice that you are asked for your
password twice.
This may happen immediately after you entered the password
the first
time, or it may happen when you click on the first link
after
authenticating the first time.
This happens for a very simple, but nonetheless confusing,
reason,
again having to do with the way that the browser caches the
login
information.
Login information is stored on the browser based on the
authentication realm, specified by the AuthName directive,
and by
the server name. In this way, the browser can distinguish
between
the Private authentication realm on one site and on another.
So, if
you go to a site using one name for the server, and internal
links
on the server refer to that server by a different name, the
browser
has no way to know that they are in fact the same server.
For example, if you were to visit the URL
http://example.com/private/,
which required authentication, your
browser would remember the supplied username and password,
associated with the hostname example.com. If, by virtue of
an
internal redirect, or fully-qualified HTML links in pages,
you are
then sent to the URL
http://www.example.com/private/,
even though
this is really exactly the same URL, the browser does not
know this
for sure, and is forced to request the authentication
information
again, since example.com and www.example.com
<
http://www.example.com> are
not exactly the same hostname. Your
browser has no particular way to know that these are the
same web site.
at first i thought that didn't make any sense because i've
been using
the same url every time. but after paying closer attention
during the
login process, i see that he's right. i've been typing in the
url with
the www, but once you get logged in, there is no www. so i
tried typing
it in without the www, and i got right in with the first
attempt.
so, i suppose my question now is, can i make it so that
typing in the
url with the www, lets you in on the first login attempt? or
should i
just tell everyone to leave out the www?
thanks for the help!
Alan wrote:
>
>> there are two
>> root directories on the server: public_html and www
>>
>
> Usually, only one of them is a real folder. The other is
a symbolic link, a
> shortcut to the other.
>
> Don't delete either of them. You might delete the real
folder instead of the
> symbolic link. And- in most hosting setups, you wont
have permissions to
> delete the folder anyway. Changing the
ownership/permissions of those
> folders prevents panicked help ticket calls.
>
> You didn't say what the host says is the reason people
are asked for
> passwords several times. What did they say?
>
> and- is the first page that opens in the password
section a framed page?
> Or- does it draw images and other files from deeper
nested directories? Such
> an images folder?
>
>

Multiple Root Bridges for VLAN1

Greetings,
I have an interesting problem with my switch environment. I have (2) 3550s acting as my distribution layer (labeled d1 and d2) and (3) 3548s acting at my access layer (labeled a1, a2 and a3). Each access switch has a single dot1q trunk link to 1 of the distribution switches (a1 and a3 link via gig-E to d1; a2 links via gig-E to d2). d1 and d2 have a single dot1q trunk link and a single routed link between them.
Currently, I am having an issue with VLAN1 on a few different levels.
Interface VLAN 1 is configured for HSRP on d1 and d2, with d2 being primary for HSRP and also it should be the root bridge for VLAN 1 (spanning-tree vlan 1 pri 4096).
First and most obvious to me when I first started looking at this problem (I recently started working at this company) is the the layer3 interface for VLAN 1 on d1 is showing down/down, even though there are trunk ports carrying VLAN 1 ok. I cannot see a reason the VLAN interface should be down/down. I have tried shutting and no shutting the interface with no luck.
The second problem is there are 4 switches (d1, d2, a1 and a3, recall both a1 and a3 have single dot1q trunks to d1) that all think they are the root bridge for VLAN1 even though I have the spanning-tree priority on d1 set lower to be root bridge. According to d1 spanning-tree, all the ports are in "DWN" status:
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
Gi0/7 Desg DWN 4 128.7 P2p
Gi0/9 Desg DWN 4 128.9 P2p
Gi0/10 Desg DWN 4 128.10 P2p
Gi0/12 Desg DWN 4 128.12 P2p
The weird part to me is that I have ~25 VLANs configured over these trunks and the rest of them don't have a problem with finding the correct root bridge.
Has anyone seen such oddness when it comes to root bridge election or the problem with VLAN 1 being down? Perhaps some advice on what else to look for in the configs?
Thanks for any information.
-jflaherty

Thanks for the reply. I see VLAN 1 being trunked and allowed from both sides on multiple links, d1 to d2 and d1 to a3, so I would think the autostate would see this and have VLAN 1 on d1 UP/UP.
d1 - g0/12 (link to d2)
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Gi0/12 1,10-11,13-15,19-23,26,40-41,43-50,52-57,100-101
d2 - g0/12 (link to d1)
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Gi0/12 1,10-11,13-15,19-23,26,40-41,43-50,52-57,100-101
And finally, a3 - g0/1 (link to d1):
Trunking VLANs Active: 1,2,5-8,20,26,44-46,48,53

ITunes Producer errors for unsupported mime and multiple root file

I've been working on this for hours and can't seem to find an answer for why these keep coming up:
ERROR ITMS-9000: "Unsupported mime type for 9781592996322.epub: null" at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
ERROR ITMS-9000: "META-INF/container.xml in 9781592996322.epub must contain one and only one root file reference." at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
Does ANYONE know what the first one means? I'm looking at the container.xml and I only have one root file reference there, so I'm confused as to why it's saying that it contains more than one. HELP!!!
Detach, to answer your question, I compressed the epub using InDesign.
Thanks, in advance, for any help anyone can provide!!!

Hi! I have the same problem, and wasted much time to resolve it too. I still not resolved it completely, but found something new: when I've run Transporter with option -m verify, i.e. in checking mode, I've seen in log the next message:
<internal_error>Unable to unzip:c:\_importmanager\_publish\20110811_145116\0\ibooks\9785428318173.itmsp\9 785428318173.epub</internal_error>
I don't have an idea why it cannot unzip and continuing to investigate. Hope it could help you.

Find multiple root organization

Hi experts,
There is a Org hierarchy where there is more than one root organization
The question is: How can I find these companies?
Example:
The main company is "YXZ Group" and it has 3 subsidiary companies: Comapny X, Y and Z
In the SAP system there are 3 root company in the system::
X Company
Y Company
Z Company
How can I identify them?: As I see the only way is to check every Org Unit in the HRP1000 table, and find those org units, where there is no B002 relation. Is there a better way?
Thanks
N.

Hi N
plz check if the there exists a Z relationship T778V and T778A-eva path.also please try TCD S_AHR_61016528
http://help.mybeacon.nc.gov/beaconhelp/Human_Resources/Org_Mgmt/Job_Aids/pdf_ERP_Reports.pdf
above will serve as a quick ref card
Hope it helps
No Worries
KG

Multiple root in Orgchart

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for