Multiple runtime configurations

Hi,
I'd like to set up multiple runtime configurations on a project. i.e. I want to be able to run the same java class with multiple program arguments or virtual machines. Is there any way I can do this without creating a separate project or using <target> in an ant file?
Thanks in advance for any help,
Venura

Hi Venura,
You can do this in Project Properties. On the Profiles page, click New... to create a new profile. You can change many of the runtime settings associated with the project for each individual profile.
Thanks,
Brian
JDev Team

Similar Messages

Multiple runtime users for the same runtime

Hi,
Is there any GUI method to create multiple runtime users to access the same runtime repository ? Currently, we are running this script:
=============
grant WB_U_UII_OWB_REP9204 to &&rep_user;
grant WB_R_UII_OWB_REP9204 to &&rep_user;
grant WB_D_UII_OWB_REP9204 to &&rep_user;
grant WB_A_UII_OWB_REP9204 to &&rep_user;
==============
Is this the correct way of doing it ?
Thanks and regards,
Biswa.

Biswa,
No way to do this in UI other than the first time the runtime repository is created by the Runtime Assistant. However, as you correctly point out, granting the following 4 roles to any user is all it takes: WB_RT_X, where RT is the name of your Runtime Repository and X is A, D, R or U:
- The User role (U) gives select access to the public views in the runtime repository.
- The Developer role (D) gives execute access to the PL/SQL packages in the runtime repository required to perform deployment operations.
- The Runtime role (R) gives execute access to the PL/SQL packages in the runtime repository required to perform execution operations.
- The Admin role (A) gives execute access to the PL/SQL packages in the runtime repository required to perform administrative operations.
So you actually have some flexibility as to what exactly you want to allow the user to do.
Nikolai Rochnik

Error while opening the CAF runtime configurator

Dear Experts,
I am very much new to the CAF, and working on it initially.
Let me explain what exactly i did.
1. Created a New development Project.
2. Created an entity under entity services.
3. Created an operation under operation tab. This is a findby operation which uses one of the attributes as the search criteria.
4. Saved the project.
5. Right clicked on the project and selected Generate code.
6. Now right clicked on the project, and then Selected BUILD, and in the popup i deselected Build if Neccesary check box.
7. Now right click on the project and choosen Deploy to J2EE.
8. Under Tasks/Properties tab, i am getting an error saying that, Failed to deply atleast one .Ear file. It also says that it needs administrator rights.even though user login which i used for SDM in the step 8 has Administrator role.
9. Now, when i goto the browser, and type the url: http://<host>:<port>/caf, where replacing host with my hostname and port with the port, I am getting an exception.
It says " Cluster wide exception.... " and some other thing.
Finally, I am struck up with these two errors..
1. Error while deploying it in to J2EE .
2. Unable to open CAF runtime configurator.
Hope i am clear in conveying the problem.
Need you help and guidance.
Regards,
Shashikanth. D

Hello,
Please check the Character formats / Text stlyes/Paragarph defined within Main window, The error is because of some inconsistency withinthe layout component.
Regards,

Runtime Workbench Proxy Runtime Configuration

Hi
I'm trying to setup the RWB proxy runtime configuration. However our ERP system shows up as an ALE-Logical system and not a Business System in the Configuration tab of the RWB and doesnt appear at all in the Component Monitoring tab so we cant monitor messages from it through the RWB.
We've tried deleting the business and technical system and re-registering them with RZ70 as well doing a CPA Cache refresh. But that hasnt resolved the issue.
I have compared this system to another system in the SLD which does show up as a Business System and can be monitored through Component Monitoring. They seem to be exactly the same.
Is there some kind of setting we are missing on the ERP system?
Thanks
Riaz

Hi Riaz & kesava,
RWB Proxy runtime setup can be seen from RWB->Component Monitoring under Components section Domain XI->Integration Engine.
Check the following
1)Can the SLD be reached? - RFC destination, ping, getLCR server, read cache, BS defined
2) Does the Integration Engine know the business system?   - Business system name = BS_100, Role = Application System
3)Are roles in SXMS_CONF_ITEMS and SLD consistent?   - Role = Application System
4)Has an Integration Server destination been defined?   Destination 'XIabcd100' to the Integration Server
Cheers
Veera

Proxy runtime configuration in PI 7.1

Hi Experts,
How to do proxy runtime configuration in PI 7.1?
Please send any documents or link available for the same.
Regards,
Nidhi Kukreja

Proxy Configuration :
Create Logical System for ECC & PI both side.
On PI Configure :
1. Create RFC Destination from PI to ABAP (Type : H).
2. Make an entry in SXMB_ADM for Integration server.
3. Activate Services in SICF.
On ECC Configure :
1. Create RFC Destination from ABAP to PI (Type : H).
2. Make an entry in SXMB_ADM for Application server.

How to create multiple pof configuration files for c# client

Is there a way to have multiple pof files for c# coherence client?
Can I create a file called my-pof-config.xml with the following line...
<pof-config xmlns="http://schemas.tangosol.com/pof">
<user-type-list>
<include>assembly://Coherence/Tangosol.Config/coherence-pof-config.xml</include>
<include>file://pof-config.xml</include>
and here is what pof-config.xml file look like
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<pof-config xmlns="http://schemas.tangosol.com/pof">
<user-type-list>
In my C# visual studio project, this is where I load my-pof-config.xml in app.config
<coherence>
<cache-factory-config>coherence.xml</cache-factory-config>
<cache-config>coherence-cache-config.xml</cache-config>
<pof-config>my-pof-config.xml</pof-config>
</coherence>
and this is what I saw in the log...
2012-02-23 14:35:35,529 DEBUG Coherence (null) - 2012-02-23 14:35:35.529 level(thread=System.Threading.Thread): Loaded POF configuration from "FileResource(Uri = file://my-pof-config.xml, AbsolutePath = D:\worktrees\ads\mainline\v2\ads\demos_cs\build\my-pof-config.xml)"
2012-02-23 14:35:35,545 DEBUG Coherence (null) - 2012-02-23 14:35:35.545 level(thread=System.Threading.Thread): Loaded included POF configuration from "EmbeddedResource(Uri = assembly://Coherence/Tangosol.Config/coherence-pof-config.xml, AbsolutePath = assembly://Coherence/Tangosol.Config/coherence-pof-config.xml)"
2012-02-23 14:35:35,623 DEBUG Coherence (null) - 2012-02-23 14:35:35.623 level(thread=ExtendTcpCacheServiceCSharp:TcpInitiator): Loaded POF configuration from "FileResource(Uri = file://my-pof-config.xml, AbsolutePath = D:\worktrees\ads\mainline\v2\ads\demos_cs\build\my-pof-config.xml)"
I don't see pof-config.xml is loaded at "Loaded included POF configuration....". How do I get around it so I can load multiple pof configuration files for c# client?

Hi,
Not sure about C# but I would suggest try removing file:// from
<include>file://pof-config.xml</include>and keep pof-config.xml and my-pof-config.xml in the same directory.
Hope this helps!
Cheers,
NJ

Question: Best practices for dealing with multiple AM configurations

Hello all,
I have a project using ADF Business Components and ADF Faces. I would like to set up multiple configurations for the Application Modules to support the following scenarios:
1). Local testing and debugging - using a connection defined in JDeveloper and AM Pooling turned off.
2). Testing and debugging on an application server - using a JDBC Data Source and AM Pooling turned off
3). Production deployment - using a JDBC Data Source and AM Pooling turned on.
It is no problem to create multiple AM configurations to reflect this scenario. In order for the web part of the application to use the correct configurations, the DataBindings.cpx file must specify the correct ones. I was thinking to have 3 different DataBindings.cpx files and to change the CpxFileName context-param in the web.xml file as needed.
My questions:
1). Does this make sense as an approach? It should be better than having to change a single AM configuration every time I deploy or test. Is there any easy way to keep multiple DataBIndings.cpx files in synch, given that we may add new pages from time-to-time? Alternatively, can we do some type of "include" processing to include just the dataControlUsages section into a common DataBindings.cpx file?
2). How would you manage the build-and-deploy process? For the most part, in JDev we would be using configuration #1. The only time to switch to configuration #2 or #3 would be to build an EAR file for deployment. Is this something that it would make sense to accomplish with ANT? I'm not an ANT expert at all. The ANT script would have "build-test-ear" and "build-prod_ear" targets which would swap in a correct web.xml file, recompile everything, build the EAR, then put the development web.xml file back. I'm relatively sure this is possible... comments?
3). Is there some other recommended approach?
I appreciate any insights from experience, or even just ideas or thoughts that I can test out.
Best regards,
John

Hi K,
Sorry for the long long delay in responding I've been traveling - and thanks for the e-mail tickler too...
To answer your question in short, I do think that ANT is the right way to go; there is an extra ANT task called XMLTask that I was able to download and play with, and it seems it would make this manipulation of the cpx file (or the xcfg file, for that matter) pretty straightforward. I don't have any code to post; it's just in the conceptual stage for me right now. I didn't see anything magical in JDev 11 TP3 that solved this problem for me either.
Having said all of that, it's more complicated than it might appear. In addition to the DataBindings.cpx file (stores, among other things, which AM configuration to use for each data control), it's certainly possible to programmatically access an AM (specifying the configuration either directly in the code or via a properties file/etc). I'm not sure what the most common use case for AM configurations is, but in my case, I have a Test configuration and a Prod configuration. The Test config, among other things, disables AM pooling. When I am developing/testing, I always use the Test config; in Production, I always use the Prod config. Perhaps the best way for me to do this would be to have an "Active" config and use ANT tasks to copy either Test or Prod to "Active." However, our Subversion repository is going to have a few complaints about this.
John

Proxy Runtime configuration in Quality

Dear All,
I am sending data from XI to BI through server proxy.
We have link between ERP quality and XI development. Do i have to do Proxy runtime configuration in quality server directly. Do I need to do it manually or transport from development?
Regards.
SM.

> We have link between ERP quality and XI development. Do i have to do Proxy runtime configuration in quality server directly.
> Do I need to do it manually or transport from development?
You have to do this manually.

ADF BC: Optimal Application Module Runtime Configuration

Have implemented an intranet application for 1000 users using the following technologies implemented on Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3.0.4:
ADF BC for my Services layer
JSF for my Controller layer
JSF and ADF for my View layer
ADF Model for my Data layer
The application is entirely designed by .jspx and .jsp pages (for reports), handling 106 application modules, with several entity and view objects and without any step-by-step stateful scenario. At each page, there appears a commit button to commit the end-user transaction, and a rollback button to return to the previous page.
The application is database-backed from an Oracle Database 10g, deployed on three application servers Oracle 10.1.3.1 on three different hosts on Suse Linux OS, used data-source connection and AM pooling, and load-balanced by one webcacher in front of the 3 servers.
Under stress test scenario, on a heavy system load in production environment, several ADF State Management errors were recognized that pushed the webacher and application server with the maximum load to automatic restarts due to either demand for JVM increased heap size or errors from the database that the TNS listener complained it could not handle any more connections.
Thus, we started a safety/reliability tess for all our application module components (disabling "Enable application module pooling"), and a stress test using a third-party stress tool at work, but we're still faced with several questions.
(a) What is the best strategy for AM configuration, to quit State Management at all since our application doesn't need it, and if so can it be done globally or declaratively and not individually and programmatically?
(b) Testing on application module runtime configuration, we observed that not to "hang-on" on a connection -default functionality- but to release it at the end of each HTTP request, as each deployment is concentrated on a single data-source connection pool/single user, brought less open JDBC connections on A.S.? Is this the optimal run-time configuration than the default for our case?
(c) If State Management errors are resolved, and using a software balancer before 3 application servers, regulate the traffice by 1/3 to each, is it possible that a system crash will be avoided next time?
So, our problems related to ADF tunning and State Management Errors, but we need a good advice on this topic as the overall documentation is case-specific.

Chapter 29 "Understanding Application Module Pooling" in the ADF Developer's Guide for Forms/4GL Developers on the ADF Learning Center at http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/adf/learnadf.html is the best place to start. There is no "magic" optimal configuration that I (or anyone here, really) can suggest to you. You need to understand the various "knobs and dials" that control the pool sizing and pool cleanup behavior, and then apply application-specific information to this information to derive what the optimal configuration for your particular application will be. The chapter explains how the application module pool and database connection pool interact, and in which situations it is best to change the default setting of the jbo.doconnectionpooling property to true.
Chapter 28 "Application Module State Management" describes the functionality of that facility of the framework, as well as how to release the application module in stateless, unmanaged mode if you need to.
By following the tips in the section "28.3.2.4 Setting Release Level in an Custom ADF PageLifecycle" (which builds on information introduced in section "10.5.4.1 Globally Customizing the ADF Page Lifecycle"), you can generically impose a different release level in your application without "touching" every page.
As a general rule, if you have:
(*) Lots of distinct application modules
(*) Each of which is used as a separate data control (rather than being nested inside a containing application module as described in section "8.9.3 Root Application Modules Versus Nested Application Module Usages" of the dev guide)
(*) Each of which uses the same database connection
Then as described in section "29.8 How Database and Application Module Pools Cooperate" in the guide, your application can decrease the total overall number of connections used by using the non-default setting of jbo.doconnectionpooling=true.
Applications using many distinct data controls in the span of a single user's session need to be aware of Bug# 4566186 ("PERF: ADFBINDINGFILTER CHECKS OUT ALL ADF BC DATA CONTROLS USED AT LEAST ONCE"). This issue has been fixed in JDev/ADF 11g, but apparently the fix was too complex to accommodate a 10.1.X backport. I'm trying to document a workaround and publish it on my blog, but I'm not finished with it yet.

Creating multiple runtime access users in OWB

Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to create multiple runtime access users in OWB. Using Runtime Repository Assistant everytime i may have to create Runtime Repository schema for creating Runtime Access user.
Regards,
Kunal

We have 1 runtime repository and many runtime access users.
Please change the repository user and rauser
CREATE USER PMIRA
IDENTIFIED BY 'PASSWORD'
DEFAULT TABLESPACE TOOLS
TEMPORARY TABLESPACE TEMP
PROFILE DEFAULT
ACCOUNT UNLOCK;
GRANT CONNECT TO PMIRA;
GRANT WB_A_OWB101RR TO PMIRA;
GRANT WB_D_OWB101RR TO PMIRA;
GRANT WB_R_OWB101RR TO PMIRA;
GRANT WB_U_OWB101RR TO PMIRA;
ALTER USER PMIRA DEFAULT ROLE CONNECT;
ALTER USER PMIRA
QUOTA UNLIMITED ON TD10_WHS_SMALL_I01
QUOTA UNLIMITED ON TD10_WHS_SMALL_D01
QUOTA UNLIMITED ON TD10_ODS_SMALL_I01
QUOTA UNLIMITED ON TD10_ODS_SMALL_D01
QUOTA UNLIMITED ON TD10_STG_SMALL
QUOTA UNLIMITED ON CONVERSIE;

[svn] 4226: Bug: LCDS-517 - Reliable messaging destinations created using runtime configuration (bootstrap service) not working.

Revision: 4226 Author: [email protected] Date: 2008-12-03 15:25:17 -0800 (Wed, 03 Dec 2008) Log Message: ----------- Bug: LCDS-517 - Reliable messaging destinations created using runtime configuration (bootstrap service) not working. QA: Yes Doc: No Checkintests Pass: Yes Details: * Make sure the <reliable/> option is treated as a nested element rather than an attribute of its parent <network> element. Ticket Links: ------------ http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/LCDS-517 Modified Paths: -------------- blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/Destination.java

Revision: 4226 Author: [email protected] Date: 2008-12-03 15:25:17 -0800 (Wed, 03 Dec 2008) Log Message: ----------- Bug: LCDS-517 - Reliable messaging destinations created using runtime configuration (bootstrap service) not working. QA: Yes Doc: No Checkintests Pass: Yes Details: * Make sure the <reliable/> option is treated as a nested element rather than an attribute of its parent <network> element. Ticket Links: ------------ http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/LCDS-517 Modified Paths: -------------- blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/Destination.java

[svn] 4195: Bug: LCDS-517 - Reliable messaging destinations created using runtime configuration (bootstrap service) not working.

Revision: 4195
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-26 13:08:23 -0800 (Wed, 26 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: LCDS-517 - Reliable messaging destinations created using runtime configuration (bootstrap service) not working.
QA: Yes
Doc: No
Checkintests Pass: Yes
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/LCDS-517
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/messaging/config/ServerConfig.as

Revision: 4195
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-26 13:08:23 -0800 (Wed, 26 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: LCDS-517 - Reliable messaging destinations created using runtime configuration (bootstrap service) not working.
QA: Yes
Doc: No
Checkintests Pass: Yes
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/LCDS-517
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/messaging/config/ServerConfig.as

[svn] 4193: Bug: LCDS-517 - Reliable messaging destinations created using runtime configuration (bootstrap service) not working.

Revision: 4193
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-26 11:40:05 -0800 (Wed, 26 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: LCDS-517 - Reliable messaging destinations created using runtime configuration (bootstrap service) not working.
QA: Yes
Doc: No
Checkintests Pass: Yes
Details:
* Foundational update to include destination config in what we collect for runtime config exchange with new clients for destinations with network/reliable=true (LCDS only).
* Also typo in comment in AbstractConnectionAwareSession fixed.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/LCDS-517
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/AbstractConnectionAwareSession.java
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/Destination.java
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/services/AbstractService.java

Revision: 4193
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-26 11:40:05 -0800 (Wed, 26 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: LCDS-517 - Reliable messaging destinations created using runtime configuration (bootstrap service) not working.
QA: Yes
Doc: No
Checkintests Pass: Yes
Details:
* Foundational update to include destination config in what we collect for runtime config exchange with new clients for destinations with network/reliable=true (LCDS only).
* Also typo in comment in AbstractConnectionAwareSession fixed.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/LCDS-517
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/AbstractConnectionAwareSession.java
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/Destination.java
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/services/AbstractService.java

Multiple Runtime Repositories

First let me explain my situation.
I have several projects and they all have similar sources and targets.
1) It appears I cannot use the same schema to hold runtime repository user for two different OWB Projects -- TRUE or FALSE?
2) I created another Runtime User for the new project, but have only one Runtime Repository Owner. This also appears to impossible as for some reason I'm unable to connect and run on this runtime. TRUE of FALSE?
3) DOes this mean I need a separate Runtime Repository Owner and Runtime User for every Project?
Thanks
Sridhar

Hey Sridhar, I love this True/False format but I will add some explanations for the extra credit ;-)
1. FALSE. Projects are just a grouping convenience at the design time. Projects have a many to many relationship to runtime repository, i.e. many projects can be deployed into the same runtime repository and the same project can be deployed into many runtime repositories. What is the symptom that make you think otherwise?
2. FALSE. Multiple Runtime Users can belong to the single Runtime Owner. The reason to have a Runtime User is security, it has very limited database privileges.
3. NO, as per above.
Nikolai Rochnik

[svn] 3420: Fix for Runtime Configuration issues.

Revision: 3420
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-09-30 11:13:54 -0700 (Tue, 30 Sep 2008)
Log Message:
Fix for Runtime Configuration issues. If the destination is initialized, then you'll want to initialize the instance when it is created. Otherwise, you want to wait until the destination is initialized. Typically, when using runtime configuration, the destination is not initialized and the instance is not initialized, instead the properties on the instance are set.
qa: no
bug: n/a
checkintests: passed
Details:
modules/core/src/flex/messaging/Destination.java
* add an initialized flag and a method for retrieving the value
modules/core/src/flex/messaging/factories/JavaFactory.java
* fix typos in comments
modules/core/src/flex/messaging/factories/JavaFactoryInstance.java
* if the destination is initialized, then you'll want to initialize the factory instance when it is created
modules/core/src/flex/messaging/FactoryDestination.java
* if the destination was not initialized before the factory instance was created, the factory instance will be initialized when the destination is initialized
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/Destination.java
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/FactoryDestination.java
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/factories/JavaFactory.java
blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/factories/JavaFactoryInstance.java

Hi JBKL, and a warm welcome to the forums!
For the Ethernet Location... Is that Interface dragged to the top of Network>Show:>Network Port Configurations?
It may be that the Router needs a Firmware update to keep up with the OS Updates... check online, don't trust any automatic checking feature in the Router.
Where are we now?

Multiple runtime configurations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for