Multiple Signatures on Large Plan Sets? - Open to Other Security Measures

Good afternoon,
I'm looking for a way to circulate large plan sets to three reviewers for digital signature. The PDFs are, and must remain, formatted to clearly print at 24''x36''. As some plan sets are 12+ pages, this is too large to pass along through our email.
We do our plan review through an online portal, where each department marks up the PDF, exports comments as FDF, and then the case manager imports all comments into one PDF. I'd prefer to find a solution for signing plans using this portal too, but I imagine it will have to be done offline and then uploaded.
I'm also open to any other solutions for locking and securing an approved document. If not a signature, maybe a timestamp or watermark on each page? Anything more secure than a simple stamp that can so easily be altered.

Similar Messages

How to avoid item suppression in multiple item PM strategy plan

Dear gurus,
we have ONE plan, which have two items. First item is linked to a task list which has 1M package, Second Item is linked to a task list which has 1M,1Y pack.
I have scheduled the task and i am not receiving a work order for the first item's 1M task, during second item's 1Y task is due.
How to over come this item suppression
PLAN:01-ITEM-01-TASK LIST-01-Pack 1M
PLAN:01-ITEM-02-TASK LIST-02-Pack 1M, 1Y
ITEM01: 1M 1M 1M -
1M 1M 1M
ITEM02: 1M 1M 1M 1Y 1M 1M 1M
Thanks in advance
Edited by: ERP_YN on Mar 22, 2011 12:56 PM

Hi ERP,
I feel it is a short-coming in SAP when using multiple Items with different Package sets.
This does not work for the selected combination, that is one TL Monthly Package & othet Monthly & Yearly when you have different Heirarchy for the Packages.
Try making the Heirarchy as same for both of them and try creating a new plan, not the old one. But not sure on the result.
Regards,
MLN Prasad

Need help in creating multiple signature forms?

need help in creating multiple signature forms that can be digitally signed in adobe reader

Automator gets a bit unweildy when trying to vary things outside of what the actions provide. Since you are already using an AppeScript in your workflow, might as well do the whole thing:
set baseFolder to (path to desktop) -- the location to create the folder
display dialog "Please provide a new folder name:" default answer "test"
set folderName to text returned of the result
repeat -- keep repeating until a number is returned
display dialog "How many subfolders?" default answer "5"
set theNumber to text returned of the result
    try -- test the result
      set theNumber to theNumber as integer
      exit repeat -- success
    end try
end repeat
tell application "Finder"
try -- make new folder
    set newFolder to (make new folder at baseFolder with properties {name:folderName})
on error number -48 -- skip errors if the folder is already there
    set newFolder to ((baseFolder as text) & folderName) as alias
end try
repeat with X from 1 to theNumber
    try -- make new subfolder
      make new folder at newFolder with properties {name:folderName & X}
    on error number -48 -- skip errors if the folder is already there
    end try
end repeat
end tell

Multiple signatures on PDF Form

I need to solve this last issue so I can put our digital signature initiative to rest.
I have attached a sample of the kind of form we need to be able to create. The first section of this form is an approval document, the second part is a closure record.
I need to be able to lock all of the fields above the first set of signature blocks when first digitally signed but not the entire form. I need the second part on page three to be locked when the digital signature is applied.
Right now any digital signature either locks the entire form (keeping others from signing) or does nothing (allowing anyone to change the content) based on the switch in the signature block object palette Signature tap Lock Fields After Signing checkbox.
I know I can cut the form in half and create two documents but this does not alleviate the problem of needing the data fields to be locked and multiple signers to be able to do so.
Any help is greatly appreciated!

Thank you Srini,
This is what I did, for anyone else with the same issue:
Tocreate signature fields in LiveCycle Designer:
Highlight the field. In the Object pallet Type field, select: Document Signature Field.
On the Document Signature tab, make sure that Lock Fields After Signing is not checked.
These fields are a quick way for users to add a digital signature in Adobe Reader.
This seems to work well. I appreciate the help.
Just to bring it full circle, how do you delete a document signature field? Haven't found it in the Help.
Thanks much!
AR

Digital Signature - Auto-Populate Multiple Signature Fields

Hello,
I am in the process of testing digital signatures with PDFs. I have a Topaz Signature Pad working in conjunction with Acrobat 9 and Reader 9 so that I can insert digital signatures with no problems.
We are wanting to take this a step further and streamline a particular business process. Does anyone know of a way to have a digital signature auto-populate multiple designated signature fields? We have about 15 documents that require an employee signature in multiple places and rather than having someone sign a document over and over again, we'd like the option for a single signature that auto-fills in all the required signature fields.
This doesn't necessarily have to work with Topaz Signature Pads. I am completely open to other suggestions, products or methodologies for making this work as long as something can be automated to auto-fill multiple signature fields.
Many thanks to the forum!
Regards,
Geoff

Hi Geoff,
Maybe there is no need to re-inent the wheel. Auto-population of forms is a feature of SignDoc - se http://www.signplus.com/en/products/signdoc/features.php#Form_Preparation
Auto-filling of forms is requirement which can be achieved through various processes.
In combination with Adobe LiveCycle this is executed in the case study of Adobe/SOFTPRO.
http://blogs.adobe.com/security/2010/01/adobe_secured_customer_showcas_8.html
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=casestudydetail&casestudyid=762388&l oc=en_us
However there are also other ways to move forward depending on the envrionment you are using.
If you are based in the US you may want to get in touch with Rod Vesling SOFTPROs E-Signature Specialist, based in CA near LA, for a chat. His office phone is 805 435 1214. His email is [email protected]
Depoending on the deice of Topaz you are usinfg you may start right away as quite a decent number of Topaz tablets are supported by SignDoc. However the best idea might be to give Rod a ring and idscus your business requirements in detail.
Kind regards
Joerg

Signature in Mail does not open and page gets frozen?

Signature in Mail doesn't open and whenever I try to open it, the page gets frozen disallowing any movement. Re-setting has been done several times but withou success. I have iPad 2 with iOS 7 (updated). I want to avoid Restoring the iPad as in this case I suspect all my data wiii get lost. Thanks for helping.

What signature in mail are you talking about? If you use the built in signatures in the settings, then I assume that you can't send mail at all if the page freezes every time that you try to write an email. When you tap the new email icon, and the window pop up, your signature is already at the bottom of the email screen.
So then you are saying that you cannot send emails correct? And you can restore an iPad without losing a thing, of you do it properly. I have restored several devices a few time and I never lost anything.

Multiple Signatures on Exchange/Outlook 365 with multiple connected pop3 accounts wanting sepearate signatures

I was referred here from another thread, see
http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/158/p/245124/778388.aspx#778388but not sure if this is the right forum, so please move/correct my posting if needed!
It's a exchange/Outlook365 query, relating to signatures
I have several connected pop3 accounts to the exchange mailbox, but there appears to be no way to have separate signatures for each connected account, in fact there appears to be only 1 signature for the entire account? So when I send emails I can select
from several different from addresses, but the signature remains the same ...
On desktop outlook 2003-2010 at least, there is the ability to have default reply, default new message signatures for each account in use, is there a way to configure the exchange/outlook365 OWA to do this ?
I'm about to test if an outlook 2010 desktop client allows/recognises the server side linked accounts and allows email to be sent from them, so any tips or points on that would be welcome!
thanks

In Outlook2010 you can set multiple signatures, yes.
If you connect to those accounts LOCALLY using POP3 you can also then set defaults for each account ... HOWEVER
if you set the CONNECTED ACCOUNTS via OUTLOOK365 via the cloud server, the local Outlook will not let you set default signatures for each account. Yes you can have signatures and manually select them, but that's not the same thing, and leads to mistakes.
The whole point of connecting the accounts via the Cloud is that the local PC is then no longer part of the critical path when away from the office, so if the local PC crashed or lost internet, then it would not affect mail delivery to the single exchange
mailbox, for access via the web or mobile devices. Quite important. A common failure we have on local outlook pop3 connections is a single password failure to login, leaves the pop up menu on screen and then stops all other pop3 mail collection from working.
We have tried for 2+ years to solve this "password failure popup", but as the passwords are saved and don't change and the problem persists, we wanted to move to the cloud ... and avoid problems when users are away.
Last but not least, if using the cloud to send a reply to a mail via a connected account, the email is not sent as the connected account (despite it being validated for send as) but sent using a "<exchange Primary email> send on behalf of <pop3
connected email>" which defeats to whole point of connecting the accounts and verifying them!
I've got to say when even Google can get this right! why can't Microsoft? It really does suck!
For a business class product having 1 signature per user within OWA is seriously deficient.
Maybe time to move our email needs to Google, as on searching the depths of old archives it does appear these issues have been raised for several years, yet nothing has improved ... shame on Microsoft.

Multiple signatures - only ever displays one

I have multiple email accounts - with, understandably, the need for multiple signatures.
When I hit reply from (let's call it) Account 1, the Account 1 signature is used.
When I hit reply from Account 2, the Account 1 signature is used!
It's pretty annoying. Yes the two accoutn have different signatures applied to them. If I swap the order in the 'Inbox' list Account 2's signature becomes the 'default' - so Account 1 & 2 use Account 2's signature...so it recognises they're different, it just isn't performing as expected.
What have I missed? Or am I going back to Thunderbird that just makes this so simple?

Did you rename each signature? Eg. Account 1 sig, account 2 sig?
Try Mobileme help - even if its Mail and you might not use it, they've chat help and might solve it.
Before you do, try troubleshooting by:
1. Going to/creating a new user account.
2. Open Mail in it.
3. Go to Prefs>Accounts and add each of your accounts.
4. Then try the sigs and see if the issue remains.
They'd ask you to do this anyways....

How to handle large data sets?

Hello All,
I am working on a editable form document. It is using a flowing subform with a table. The table may contain up to 50k rows and the generated pdf may even take up to 2-4 Gigs of memory, in some cases adobe reader fails and "gives up" opening these large data sets.
Any suggestions?

On 25.04.2012 01:10, Alan McMorran wrote:
> How large are you talking about? I've found QVTo scales pretty well as
> the dataset size increases but we're using at most maybe 3-4 million
> objects as the input and maybe 1-2 million on the output. They can be
> pretty complex models though so we're seeing 8GB heap spaces in some
> cases to accomodate the full transformation process.
Ok, that is good to know. We will be working in roughly the same order
of magnitude. The final application will run on a well equipped server,
unfortunately my development machine is not as powerful so I can't
really test that.
> The big challenges we've had to overcome is that our model is
> essentially flat with no containment in it so there are parts of the
We have a very hierarchical model. I still wonder to what extent EMF and
QVTo at least try to let go of objects which are not needed anymore and
allow them to be garbage collected?
> Is the GC overhead limit not tied to the heap space limits of the JVM?
Apparently not, quoting
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/gc-tuning-6-140523.html:
"The concurrent collector will throw an OutOfMemoryError if too much
time is being spent in garbage collection: if more than 98% of the total
time is spent in garbage collection and less than 2% of the heap is
recovered, an OutOfMemoryError will be thrown. This feature is designed
to prevent applications from running for an extended period of time
while making little or no progress because the heap is too small. If
necessary, this feature can be disabled by adding the option
-XX:-UseGCOverheadLimit to the command line."
I will experiment a little bit with different GC's, namely the parallel GC.
Regards
Marius

Displaying large result sets in Table View u0096 request for patterns

When providing a table of results from a large data set from SAP, care needs to be taken in order to not tax the R/3 database or the R/3 and WAS application servers. Additionally, in terms of performance, results need to be displayed quickly in order to provide sub-second response times to users.
This post is my thoughts on how to do this based on my findings that the Table UI element cannot send an event to retrieve more data when paging down through data in the table (hopefully a future feature of the Table UI Element).
Approach:
For data retrieval, we need to have an RFC with search parameters that retrieves a maximum number of records (say 200) and a flag whether 200 results were returned.
In terms of display, we use a table UI Element, and bind the result set to the table.
For sorting, when they sort by a column, if we have less than the maximum search results, we sort the result set we already have (no need to go to SAP), but otherwise the RFC also needs to have sort information as parameters so that sorting can take place during the database retrieval. We sort it during the SQL select so that we stop as soon as we hit 200 records.
For filtering, again, if less than 200 results, we just filter the results internally, otherwise, we need to go to SAP, and the RFC needs to have this parameterized also.
If the requirement is that the user must look at more than 200 results, we need to have a button on the screen to fetch the next 200 results. This implies that the RFC will also need to have a start point to return results from. Similarly, a previous 200 results button would need to be enabled once they move beyond the initial result set.
Limitations of this are:
1.     We need to use custom RFC function as BAPIs dont generally provide this type of sorting and limiting of data.
2.     Functions need to directly access tables in order to do sorting at the database level (to reduce memory consumption).
3.     Its not a great interface to add buttons to Get next/previous set of 200.
4.     Obviously, based on where you are getting the data from, it may be better to load the data completely into an internal table in SAP, and do sorting and filtering on this, rather than use the database to do it.
Does anyone have a proven pattern for doing this or any improvements to the above design? Im sure SAP-CRM must have to do this, or did they just go with a BSP view when searching for customers?
Note I noticed there is a pattern for search results in some documentation, but it does not exist in the sneak preview edition of developer studio. Has anyone had in exposure to this?
Update - I'm currently investigating whether we can create a new value node and use a supply function to fill the data. It may be that when we bind this to the table UI element, that it will call this incrementally as it requires more data and hence could be a better solution.

Hi Matt,
i'm afraid, the supplyFunction will not help you to get out of this, because it's only called, if the node is invalid or gets invalidated again. The number of elements a node contains defines the number of elements the table uses for the determination of the overall number of table rows. Something quite similar to what you want does already exist in the WD runtime for internal usage. As you've surely noticed, only "visibleRowCount" elements are initially transferred to the client. If you scroll down one or multiple lines, the following rows are internally transferred on demand. But this doesn't help you really, since:
1. You don't get this event at all and
2. Even if you would get the event, since the number of node elements determines the table's overall rows number, the event would never request to load elements with an index greater than number of node elements - 1.
You can mimic the desired behaviour by hiding the table footer and creating your own buttons for pagination and scrolling.
Assume you have 10 displayed rows and 200 overall rows, What you need to be able to implement the desired behaviour is:
1. A context attribute "maxNumberOfExpectedRows" type int, which you would set to 200.
2. A context attribute "visibleRowCount" type int, which you would set to 10 and bind to table's visibleRowCount property.
3. A context attribute "firstVisibleRow" type int, which you would set to 0 and bind to table's firstVisibleRow property.
4. The actions PageUp, PageDown, RowUp, RowDown, FirstRow and LastRow, which are used for scrolling and the corresponding buttons.
The action handlers do the following:
PageUp: firstVisibleRow -= visibleRowCount (must be >=0 of course)
PageDown: firstVisibleRow += visibleRowCount (first + visible must be < maxNumberOfExpectedRows)
RowDown/Up: firstVisibleRow++/-- with the same restrictions as in page "mode"
FirstRow/LastRow is easy, isn't it?
Since you know, which sections of elements has already been "loaded" into the dataSource-node, you can fill the necessary sections on demand, when the corresponding action is triggered.
For example, if you initially display elements 0..9 and goto last row, you load from maxNumberOfExpected (200) - visibleRows (10) entries, so you would request entries 190 to 199 from the backend.
A drawback is, that the BAPIs/RFCs still have to be capable to process such "section selecting".
Best regards,
Stefan
PS: And this is meant as a workaround and does not really replace your pattern request.

Create Multiple Signature and Date fields with a custom Toolbar Button

First off, thanks in advance! I am a scripting newbie and I am trudging my way through with very little experience with scripting of any kind. I am good at taking other's scripts and forming them into something I need, but I can't seem to find anything to do what I want.
Using Adobe Acrobat X, I am trying to create a toolbar button that I can press to create multiple signature and date fields with predetermined locations.
Below is the script I have that is working to create just a single signature box, but I can't seem to figure out the exact syntax to have that same button create multiple fields. In total it is 9 signature fields and 9 date fields need to be created. If you can just give me an example of what the button would look like with multiple scripts? I was assuming I would set up multiple variables and then in the cExec property of the toolbar button I could just call out all of those variables?
var sigswm = "addField('sigSWM', 'signature', '0', [108, 198, 494.64, 72])"
app.addToolButton({cName: "dotbutton", cExec: sigswm, cLabel: "Place Signature and Date Blocks",});
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
Billy Sweeney

Thanks! That was probably the only thing I didn't try.
I do have one more question. What I want is when the signature field is clicked it fills out a specific date field. I beleive the script I want would be:
var currentTime = new Date()
    var month = currentTime.getMonth() + 1
    var day = currentTime.getDate()
    var year = currentTime.getFullYear()
    var signingTime = day +"/"+month+"/"+year
    var f = this.getField("dateSWM");
    f.value = signingTime;
I found this on another thread that mentioned it could be placed in the Signed tab of the signature properties dialog. I am assuming it would be placed in my button script file as a setAction script for each signature, but I am not real sure exactly where or how?

Outlook 2010 - can you add multiple signatures to a single email?

Basically using 2 or 3 signatures to create a quick email? By adding a 2nd or 3rd signature to a new email. I can't get this to work like it did in 2007.
Thank you for any help.

Hi,
Thank you for using Outlook IT Pro Discussions forum.
We can certainly add multiple signatures to a new email.
In Outlook 2010, click
File > Options > Mail > Signature. We can add multiple signatures there, and set a default signature.
After that, when we compose an email, click the
Insert tab, click Signature in the
Include group, we can choose other signatures.
If you encounter any problems when trying to add the signatures, please let me know.
Best Regards,
Sally Tang

XML Solutions for Large Data Sets

Hi,
I'm working with a large data set (9 million records comprising 36 gigabytes) and am exploring the use of XML with it.
I've experimented with a JDBC app (taken straight from Steve Muench's excellent <i>Oracle_XML_Applications</i>) for writing to CLOBS, but achieve throughputs of much less than 40k/s (the minimum speed required to process the data in < 10 days).
What kind of throughputs are possible loading XML records from CLOBs into multiple tables (using server-side Java apps)?
Could anyone comment whether XML is a feasible possibility for this size data set?
Regards,
Mike

Just would like to identify myself (I'm the submitter):
Michael Driscoll <[email protected]>.
null

Multiple keyfigure from different planning area based on attribute value

Multiple keyfigure from different planning area based on the attribute value of Cost element charac.
I need to obtain the value of the attribute in a fox function. Let me explain it further.
Background :
Planning area -
Charac----
KF
area1 -
Payscale group--- Amount
Cost element------AmountVR
area2--Payscalegroup----KF1
KF2
KF3
Cost Element has an attribute "Type"
Value for attribute "Type" = 1,2,3
Based on the value of the attribute, the corresponding KF needs to be multiplied.
Logic :
If type = 1.
AmountVR = Amount * KF1.
elseif type = 2.
AmountVR = Amount * KF2.
elseif type = 3.
AmountVR = Amount * KF3.
endif.
The problem I'm facing is that I'm not able to read the data of attribute "Type". None of the below statement retrieve the value of the "Type".
TYPE = ATRV(Attribute,COSTELEMENT,CO_AREA)
or
TYPE = ATRV(Attribute,COSTELEMENT)
Could you please help me in reading from a time dependent compounding InfoObject?
Regards,
Raghu

Hi..
Thanx Bindu..
I have actual data for Month days..if i am craeting in same layout it is too large.
that's why i am creating two layouts.
below example for better undersatnding.
Actual:
D1 :D2: D3 :D4 : D5 :D6 : D7   : FULLACT (sume of C(1) sum of d1 to d7))
10 :8 :12 : 10 : 14   : 6 : 10    : 70
Plan:
D1EST : D2EST: D3EST :D4EST :D5EST: D6EST: D7EST: FULLEST (sum of d1 to d7)
10         :10        : 10      : 10      :10       :    10    :     10 :         70
How can i read FULLACT value and that value i have to distribute equally in planing layout and always FULLEST is equal to FULLACT.if not equal i have to throug error message hoe can i setup if you have sample code can you send it to me.
what is your idea....
Edited by: Eyda rose on Jun 4, 2008 4:59 PM

Plans to Open Source Identity Manager

Hello all! Are there plans to open-source Identity Manager much as Sun has done for Access Manager (OpenSSO) and Federation Manager (OpenFM). :-)
Best,
--John

In next future, Identity Manager will be in open source. But, Access Manager, I don't have news.
Regards.

Multiple Signatures on Large Plan Sets? - Open to Other Security Measures

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for