Multiple Stock Valuation without AVR

Hi,
We have requirement to keep and book 2 actual costs stock valuation version which are according to IFRS and local.
Understand that SAP standard solution is AVR. But we can't use it because our upstream business not using PP at this moment.
Please advice if any best solution for this ?
Thank you

Hi,
I don't know what you mean by AVR, but in MM the standard solution for your requirement is called "split valuation".
Or do you mean having the same stock but valuated to two different prices? In such case the "material ledger" functionality in CO can help you.
BR
Raf

Similar Messages

Stock Valuation - Inventory Management Cube

Dear Sap Gurus,
We have implemented the Inventory Management Cube in BW.
Quantities are correct, but we have difference on the stock valuation.
For some material stock value are correct, for some other they are not correct.
A saw a lot of OSS notes and how to on this subject, I am trying to solve this issue using these documents, but based on your experience could you explain me how you solved this issue ????
Thanks,

Hi
Did you follow the correct steps?
Initialisation of BX data in the first step.(Loading of Opening Stock)
Then The request in which the opening stock was loaded must always be
compressed with a marker update
Init load of BF And UM in the second step
The request in which the historical material documents were contained
must always be compressed without a marker update and
Successive delta uploads must always be compressed with marker
updates
Check this whether you have done this or not.
Because of missing the steps here also would give you wrong values,
Regards
Ram

S032 has incorrect stock valuation quantity

Hi All,
We are performing an implementation and are loading stock take-on. We have noticed an inconsistency between the LIS and MB52 (material master stock valuation). After some investigations it only happens when we are loading materials using multiple material docs to accomodate stock ageing.
e.g.
We have uploaded the following stock take-ons for material ABC (all have different document dates for the ageing):
4900005615 1 13.03.2006 10 EA
4900010309 1 13.03.2006 4 EA
4900012842 1 13.03.2006 15 EA
4900013311 1 13.03.2006 2 EA
MB52 gives a qty of 31 whereas MC.1 transaction gives a qty of 84! MC.1 reads from LIS structure S032 and this has the erroneous record showing qty 84... it should be 31.
Any ideas? Could this be caused by the S032 setup? Is it being updated incorrectly in standard code? We are using SAP All-in-one so the LIS was pre-configured by SAP. We have an OSS open with SAP but this is getting very urgent.
Any ideas are muach appreciated.
Thanks,
Niall

Hi Ferry,
Thanks for your reply. Hmmm. I am a little confused here. While the quantities are incorrect on S032 the valuation is correct. There are no rules against either field (i.e. qty or value) and they are both setup as 'Cumulative updating'.
When I run an update check on the material document it gives me the correct amount!
When I check (Updating -> Check) the Info Structure SAP suggests a different field to use. See msg below:
Valuated stock: Instead of using MCBEST-MBWBEST use MCBEST-BVBEW
Message no. M!126
Diagnosis
You update the key figure Valuated stock with the source field MCBEST-MBWBEST.
Cumulitavely this is not the best choice, because stock would have cumulated in each goods movement and excessively large stock is created.
This can cause problems via data transport, because stock fields are always filled. If you do not keep very detailed stock, one stock is overwritten by another (for example, batch stock is overwritten by a different batch stock).
I am even more confused now!
Thanks,
N.
PS: We have already uploaded the data so a retrospective fix would be ideal.

Alternative valuation run AVR and "Following run"

Hello,
We are using the Material Ledger (Alternative valuation run AVR) with multiple periods, in the "settings " tab we flagged
- "Posting run"
- "Revaluate Consumption"
- "Relevant for costing".
We would like to use the new costing run as "Following run" (ie we created the costing run for the period 01-2011 (January 2011) starting from the costing run of the period 12-2010 (December 2010); the costing run covers the period 01-2011).
A month later, we would like to create a cumulated costing run for the two periods 01 and 02 (January and February 2011); the correct way is to create the costing run for the period 02-2011 (February 2011) starting from the costing run of the period 12-2010 (December 2010)?
In this way we have
- Initial period '01-2011 '
- Period '02-2011 '. (following run of 12-2010 (December 2010).
A month later again, we would like to create a cumulated costing run for the three periods 01 to 03 (January , February and March 2011); the correct way is to create the costing run for the period 03-2011 (March 2011) starting from the costing run of the period 12-2010 (December 2010)?
In this way we have
- Initial period '01-2011 '
- Period '03-2011 '. (following run of 12-2010 (December 2010).
Is it this the correct way to use the "Following run" functionality?
Are There other ways to use the "Following run"?
Could you please indicates u201Chow tou201D documentation or other documentation?
Thanks in advance.
Mario

Hi Gianmario,
I need to run Alternative valuation starting from the alternative of the last period.
For example: we want to create AVR for the period 01-2015 starting from the alternative of 12-2014 (because my user want to take value and inventory from the last alternative that he run in December)
So :
In January
1)      initial period 01-2015
2)      Period 01-2015
3)      Following run 12-2014
In February
1)      initial period 01-2015
2)      Period 02-2015
3)      Following run 12-2014
And so on…
I need to understand if this is the correct method to use “following run” because I don’t found material or documentation on this aspect, but I found only your post.
So have you found material/Documentation of this aspect? Or if you use “following run” in this mode have you found problems?
Thanks in advance
Claudia

Problem with project stock valuation class

Dear All,
We have an issue regarding the Revenue Inventory and Capital Inventory. There is a certain balance amount which should be in capital but system is showing in Revenue and vice versa.
The reason for this is that when the material was created, in some materials the main valuation class was 3032(Project) and in some it was maintained as 3030(revenue). But project stock valuation class was not maintained.
Now the problem persists in the G/L balances, the G/L of project stock (132006)displays some amount of revenue(132000) and vice versa.
We tried to maintain the project stock valuation class (3032) for materials for which the main valuation class is 3030 (Revenue),but still the G/L for revenue (132000) is getting hit.
At the end, the requirement is that G/L for revenue (132000) should hit when revenue procurement is there and G/L for capital (132006) should hit when capital procurement is there.
Kindly suggest the way forward.
Regards,
Harsh

Thanks Venkat, we have thought of the same as a last stop but there are hundreds of materials which has this problem and there would be many open documents for them.
If anything could be suggested other then this, and I wanted clarification on one more point that the materials for which main valuation class was 3030 and later we added 3032 in project stk Val class but after maintaining it. When we procure(Capital procurement), it is still showing the balance in G/L 132000(Revenue).
Regards,
Harsh

Stock valuation down to Storage location level

Dear all,
System setup for stock valuation is till Plant level. And understand that's how data stored in table MBEW and MBEWH until plant level only.
Eventhough that is system standrd, is that possible to get the stock valuation until Storage location level?
For eg: In MB5B, there is opening stock, closing stock and the material movement posting. I need to get opening and closing stock for each storage location.
Could you please comment if there are tables store these data? Kindly comment.

Hi Afshad Irani,
Thanks for your reply. Understand from the previous post that stock valuation for storage location can be done via table MARDH or report MC.9, but this tools are excess base on period/month basis.
My case, i need to report storage location stock for both (1)last month 06.2010 and (2)yesterday's stock 06.07.2010. So i can use MARDH table to report (1)last month stock for each storage location. While for (2) yesterday stock, table MARDH isn't help.
Could you please advice further?

Storage location wise project stock valuation

Hi all,
I am tying to generate a report for storage locationwise project stock valuation. MBBS is giving the data valuation type as well as WBS element wise valuation.That is fine. I want to show the data storage location wise. So, I have taken MSPR table where I am getting data storage location wise. For this stock, i am picking up unit price from QBEW table. My user says there will be cases that the material comes in with different prices in a same financial period.Here I am facing issue when there are two prices for the same material with same Val.area and same WBS element .Pls tell me how can I pick up the correct price.

Hi,
If stock with different price under 1 plant and 1 WBS Element put into different storage location based on the material price then in table MSPR we can have LGORT (storage location) as indicator there. Otherwise, since valuation type is not implemented, there is no other way you can differentiate stock based on price as you mentioned before.

Stock valuation Report problem in crystal

Hello
I have created Stock Valuation report on crystal & give parameter For Selection 'from Date' To 'To DATE'
I maintain 'On Hand' field for quantity available in between selected period
But Suppose I have Item code 'X01' having actual balnce qty 67 between 1 Jully 2011 To 31 jully 2011 when i run the
report by same date it display 67 qty it right but the Item 'X01' Sold out 5 Qty on date 2 Augst and i again run the report
between date 1 Jully 2011 and 31 jully 2011 it Show 62 qty but upto 31st Jully i have 67 Qty remaining but it show 62 this is wrong
so how i brought 67 qty upto 31 Jully in Crystal Report
In Inventory audit Report it show perfect qty on date selection but i want right value in my crystal report

Hi,
The on hand balance is dynamic. You can not get it from any table for historical balance.
You have to create a temporary table to calculate from day one of inventory transaction for the item.
Thanks,
Gordon

Closing Stock Valuation doesn't matched physicallly

Hi SAP Gurus.,
Can you please assist me reg this issue"Closing Stock Valuation doesn't matched physicallly".
May I know the possible rectification ways to solve this problem.
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Balaji Bhonsle

Physical Inventory...
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/physical-inventory-process.htm

Is there a way to send and receive SMS on multiple cellular devices without using iMessage?

I currently own a cellular iPad mini and an iPhone 4s and would like SMS to be the same on both devices as well as my desktop.
After many months of struggling with iMessage, I decided to turn it off entirely. I discovered that my best friend did not receive dozens of my texts over the span of a few months (I compared our message history side by side). Seems like it had something to do with traveling in and out of wifi zones or possibly conflicts between our two carriers, ATT and Verizon. Regardless, I am not willing to dive into iMessage fully until this gets sorted out. Further, SMS is the standard message format for everyone outside of the Apple sphere, and I do not feel comfortable lumping them together into one app. If I decide to switch to Android, will all of my contacts with iPhones continue sending me iMessages?
Thank you for your help!

Is there a way to send and receive SMS on multiple cellular devices without using iMessage?
Search the iTunes App Store for any 3rd party SMS apps that may be available.
If I decide to switch to Android, will all of my contacts with iPhones continue sending me iMessages?
Android phones don't receive iMessages, they can recieve SMS messages sent through the iOS Messages app. The app that your contacts choose to use to send you messages is completely up to them.

Stock valuation at store level

Hi Experts
I've added the charactaristic 0STOR_LOC to cube 0RT_C36 to have stock cost by store, however, it's not working as expected, totals for any other characteristic (plant, material, month, day .. ) and ratios quantity and stock value are working fine but when I drill down to plant->store the quantities are ok but the stock value is not.
the question is, it's possible to have stock valuation at store level?, i understand that the valuation in R/3 is at plant level not store, but in infosource 2is_03_bf we have 0STORE_LOC, so it makes sense to have a finner grain isn't it?
I compare data from bw with transactions MC.5, with transaction RWBE its not possible have stock value at store level.
thanks for any help

Thank you for your quick reply
I've checked the link, which is just what I was looking for ...
by the way, do you know where the these how to papers have gone?, I used to get them in
http://service.sap.com/bi -> service & implementation -> HOW TO ... Guides -> BW 3.x (or something like that)
now there is a list under
http://service.sap.com/bi -> service & implementation -> HOW TO ... Guides -> Guide List Sap BW 3.5 - part of NW 04
a list like this appears:
Cross-Component Technical Scenarios
Portal, KM and Collaboration
Web Application Server
Business Intelligence
Master Data Management
Exchange Infrastructure
which is almost empty, so where the howto papers are gone?
thanks again

Actuals for stock valuated materials in a valuated project stock

Hi friends!
Iu2019m working with materials in the project, and we are going to do direct external procurement from the project. The material we are using are valuated stock and in the project I have valuated project stock.
The requirements are that the vendor give us the material prices, and the material will not be consumed by the project(WBS/network). All the material will be collected to the special project stock until we decide to move the material to the unrestricted stock to be consumed by another department in the company. All the actual cost must follow-up in the project.
This is what I do:
From the project I create material components and I create the PO requisition I got the same price as in the project. Thatu2019s ok.
When I convert the PO requisition to the PO I got no price but if I save I got the latest used price for the material and this could varied and it´s ok but should not work like this for this scenario.
My doubts are when I do the goods receipt (MIGO) and the price of the material in the PO are not the same as the stock valuated price I got the difference as actuals in the project and the valuation of the material are in the project stock. If the price of the PO is the same as the valuation price I got no actuals in the project.
When I register the invoice from the vendor (MIRO) I got no actuals either so I cannot do my project follow-up costs. When I check the cost they are in accounting (balance sheet account).
When I do the material movement with 411Q to unrestricted stock I donu2019t get any actuals in the project either.
Is this a normal behavior when using stock valuated materials in a valuated project stock?
I SAP help I found this information for non valuated project stock:
u201CAll the actual production costs appear in the project because no price variances can occur and all external procurement follow-up costs are debited to the WBS element.u201D
But if the best practice is to use valuated project stock why follow-up costs cannot be done in the project?
Please give me some ideas of this,
Best regards
Jose Marin

If the mateiral was created using the no stock material material type then yes you can see this material in MM60. Search using material type 'NLAG' for non stock.
Regards,

In Project stock valuation during GR MAP is picked up from VMVER field

Hi!
We are facing an issue during the GR of Material in Production order.
I will explain the scenario:
The main material is valuated in MAP (Moving average price).
On creation of the production order the planned value is coming ok ( summation of components).
As it was a project valuation, the MAP values are getting stored in the table QBEW.
The point of concern is at the time of doing GR the actual value is getting picked up from the field VMVER (=MAP/Period unit price in previous period)
and not from the field VERPR (= MAP/Period unit price).
As per the scenario the system must consider the latest MAP value that is from VERPR and not from VMVER.
Can't find out what setting is affecting this selection.
Abhra

Hi,
I am still having problems with this issue. The material is extended for plant 1200 and a valuation class and project stock valuation class have been set.
Is there a configuration setting required?

Stock value in Stock Valuation Report

Does anyone know how you shouid use the stock cost shown by the Stock Valuation Report?
I am looking at a database which uses standard costing, and trying to use the Stock Valuation Report to see what the stock value would be at Moving Average.
Some of the records on the Stock Valuation Report have a zero stock quantity but a stock cost (supposedly Moving Average) and a stock value. There are also records with neagtive stock costs and values.
I have found SAP Notes which confirm that you can get stock values where there are zero quantities. However if you ignore the zero quantity liines, is the Moving Average cost shown accurate or is it the case that this report is essentially useless if you have a continuous stock system?
Regards,
Douglas

Hi Douglas,
I found this in one the SAP Notes.
Symptom
In the Stock Audit Report, generated for a specific warehouse, a value is shown in the 'Cumulative Value' column even if the item does not have quantity.
Other terms
Inventory Audit Report, Stock Audit Report, warehouse, cumulative, value, zero, quantity, average cost, System Initialization, per company, use perpetual inventory, SAP Business One
Reason and Prerequisites
Consulting
Solution
The 'Manage Item Cost per Warehouse' setting in the Administration -> System Initialisation -> Company Details -> Basic Initialisation tab determines the information displayed in the Stock Audit Report.
When this option is selected, each warehouse defined in SAP Business Onemaintains its own cost. This warehouse cost is calculated whenever there is a movement of the item in the specific warehouse.
When this option is not selected, a single cost is maintained for the item per company. This cost is determined by the movement of the item within all warehouses.
SAP Business One uses the calculated costs to reduce the inventory value when stocks are issued. If the cost is managed by warehouse, then,the item cost will be from the specific warehouse where the stocks are issued; otherwise, the item cost will be the single cost.
With the difference between the specific warehouse's and the entire warehouses' costs, there is a possibility that costs remain in the specific warehouse even if the quantity is already zero. In this scenario, viewing the Stock Audit Report per warehouse may not provide accurate cumulative value of the stock in that warehouse since the valuation is a combination of different warehouses. The Stock Audit Report then can be used to check the quantities per warehouse. If the valuation of the stock is needed, the report must be generated for all warehouses
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Joseph

Multiple IDOC to Multiple IDOC scenario without BPM steps????

Hi
Could you please give me the solution for this ???
I want steps for sending all IDOCs at a time- ---"Multiple IDOC to Multiple IDOC scenario without using BPM".???
thanks
3nadh

Hello,
Refer the below, for certain details!
/people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi ALE configuration for pushing idocs from SAP to XI
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change XI: IDOC bundling - the "trick" with the occurance change
Regards,
Jilan

Multiple Stock Valuation without AVR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for