Multiple transports in Code Inspector object set

I'd like to be able to put a Code Inspector object set together with multiple transports and my current version (46c)only supports a single input. Anyone know how to input multiple transports?
Tim Barrow
ADP

Tim,
Even the current version (7.0) supports just one transport request. Looks like that is ruled out, then.
You could use the first tab (Select object set) to include multiple packages? Or you could use the 'free selection' to specify objects..
Hope this helps.
Sudha

Similar Messages

Code Inspector - Object Set Versions

Hello Gurus,
Suppose We've created an Obj set (Using Tcode SCI ) say by name "zobjset" (with version 001) and it contains 7 objects (Say) . Subsequntly i've created another Version (Version 002) under same obj set name, and it has 9 objects (Say).
Now my question is can I coampare these two versions manually so that I can avoid redundancy (At the time of version Creation) in object list.
Coz we can create a maximum of 999 versions, and it may be difficult to check every version of an object to avoid redundncy.?
is there any report / transaction like thing to compare objects in object list versions.....

you can check this thread : [Comparing object versions and import order between systems]

Transport an Appraisal and Objective Setting Template

Note the following advice pertaining to transporting an appraisals and objective setting template (I have not found documentation about this anywhere else, so hopefully some of you find this useful):
Scenario:
You have maintained your templates in PHAP_CATALOG_PA in the main config client, and you have transported all other configurations (basic settings, etc.) to your unit test/integration test environment.
However, although you have right-clicked the category groups and templates to be transported and included them in a transport request, you find that only some of your configuration (or perhaps none at all!) is arriving in the target client when the transport is performed.
You may initially be able to work around this by downloading/uploading your config, but once your templates contain more complex configuration (such as using dynamic element references, etc.) you will find that this is no longer a feasible approach.
Cause & Resolution:
The problem is caused by outdated information in the workflow definition environment (transaction SWU3), and specifically the section labeled "Check Entries from HR Control Tables".
Run transaction SWU3, expand tree node "Maintain Definition Environment" (which should be marked with a red cross at this stage) and click on "Check Entries from HR Control Tables". The information presented in the right-hand pane indicates that:
If there are errors regarding the transport objects PDST or PDWS, the relevant entries are not maintained in table SOBJ. You can use the report RHSOBJCH to rectify this later.
Proceed as suggested and run report RHSOBJCH (through SE38 or SA38) in the config client (i.e. where the templates are to be transported from). This has no side-effects I am aware of other than updating the reference information required.
If you now run SWU3 again you should find that the "Check Entries from HR Control Tables" node is marked with a green tick.
Simply go back to the catalog, include your cat.groups & templates in a transport again, and Voila! Our work here is done.
Happy transporting...
Side-note: You may ask (as I did) what transporting of appraisal templates has to do with workflow, but it just so happens that the PD objects and infotypes associated with appraisals (VA, VB, VC, etc.) are transported through the same mechanism as workflow templates (which are also PD objects). if you peek inside the transport you will note that everything to do with the template and category group configuration is bundled inside PDWS and PDST transport objects...
Edited by: Francois Van Lille on Jun 29, 2009 9:58 AM

>
A. Jimenez wrote:
> Hi Francois,
>
> I have successfully transported Categories and Templates, but I have customized "appraisals process", which seems to create VH Objects, and this objects or customizations are not added in the transport order.
>
> You or anyone know how to transport this customization?
>
> Thanks in advance
Hi Abe,
what is the appraisal process you are talking about? The new stuff in ep4 where you define the process and steps which create the roadmap at the top of the document? if so SAP does not have a great straightforward solution, but they did provide us some options.
you can check out this thread and if you want I can send you the full document that is referred to in the post.
EP4: Performance Management-Flexible-Transporting the Tab & Process config

How to find multiple transport requests for one object

Hi all,
Is there any function module which will fetches multiple transport requests ( if created ) for one object.I tried almost all the function modules , but i didn't got the solution.
I need to develop a report ,   which will takes a single Task number as input and gets the Request number from table E070.
Based on that Request Number i will fetch remaining Task numbers under it.
Then for all the Tasks Numbers, i am fetching their objects by using table E071.
I need to list out whether any of these objects are in multiple Transport Requests. Once i got all the Transport Request numbers i need to release the Request based on their Transport Request sequence.
I tried the following FM's , but not able to get the solution.
SVRS_DISPLAY_VERSION_LIST
SVRS_GET_VERSION_DIRECTORY_46
SVRS_GATHER_REQUEST_FRAGS
Thanks..

Hello
I have tried with below code
DATA list_tab TYPE TABLE OF abaplist.
SUBMIT RSWBO040 USING SELECTION-SET 'TEST'
                EXPORTING LIST TO MEMORY
               AND RETURN.
CALL FUNCTION 'LIST_FROM_MEMORY'
   TABLES
     listobject = list_tab
   EXCEPTIONS
     not_found = 1
     OTHERS           = 2.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
   CALL FUNCTION 'WRITE_LIST'
     TABLES
       listobject = list_tab.
ENDIF.
break-point.
Submitting the program(RSWBO040) of SE03 transaction a will result in 'CNTL_ERROR' dump.
Please try some other options
Thanks

Multiple Transports for the Same Object.

I have ABAP program 123 and I make a change, create transport A and release the transport. I do not request transport A go to production.
I then modify ABAP program 123 again, create transport B and release the transport. I do not request transport B go to production.
Now I request transport A go to production.
Can someone explain to me why the changes in transport B are included when transport A is moved to production?
I thought each transport would be at its own change level.
Thank-you.

I can guarantee all of you that when Transport A was moved, it contained changes that were made in Transport B.
Surely you understand that Thomas is correct and that there's a logical reason, not related to transport layer configuration, for the issue? You CAN have multiple transports open for the same object without a lock by forcing it but check the dates as already suggested...

Can we have multiple transports for the same object.

Hi guys,
Can we have multiple transports for same object in dev system. Can anyone tell me how can this be done.
Thanks

Its not possible for the same development object. Only 1 person can access an object at a time and if mutiple users modify an object new TASKs are created under the same TRANSPORT.
Only after releasing the tr you can create a new tr on the same object.
Message was edited by:
Abhishek Jolly

Code Inspector/ATC checks for VKOS/VKOI object types

Dear Experts,
I found a strange behavior while executing CI checks on a transport request. TR contained only IMG Activity objects (Object Type VKOS/VKOI). After CI checks it gave errors "Recognized dead code". There is no coding for these kind of object type, I don't know where it was able to find the dead code. On debugging I found that, it is trying to populate Program name concatenatinv " SAPIC " and the object type. ( SAPICVKO). But there is no such program existing. It then gives "Recognized dead code" error.
Has anyone faced such error before? I guess this is error in the standard program.
Thank you.

Other language NUnit test frameworks similar to ABAP Unit (AUnit) commonly have project extensions for storing test results. These are useful for the unit level regression (did a new change break any existing functions). History of test results, help narrow down the nature of a current failure by answering the question of 'When did this break?' or when did it last pass? In systems dependent upon outside components the history can provide a pattern for occasional failures due to factors outside the system under test.
I see that ABAP unit test results can be added into the Code Inspector under the Check Variant.
1. Is it common or recomended to use the Code Inspector (SCI) to store AUnit test results?
2. Is it common or recomended to use Code Inspector Object variants to collect individual AUnit tests for a regresssion style 'TestSuite'?
3. What reporting or tools exists for Code Inspector history?
4. Is Application Logging the better spot for AUnit results history?
(also posted on the wiki.. apologies - I'm new to the forum and wiki)
Will Loew-Blosser

Code Inspector & ABAP UNIT Testclasses

Hallo all,
I am currently trying to implement automated checks using the code inspector. I especially want to see if all our developers use our naming conventions. Also, we use ABAP Unit tests. Unfortunately, the generated test classes are not compliant with our name conventions (And also these Test classes are not interesting to be checked).
Now, I receive many warnings, mostly from the Unit test implementations.
Now: Is there a way to exclude these local test classes from my object set?
Thanks for you help!
Best regards,
Martin Imme

Other language NUnit test frameworks similar to ABAP Unit (AUnit) commonly have project extensions for storing test results. These are useful for the unit level regression (did a new change break any existing functions). History of test results, help narrow down the nature of a current failure by answering the question of 'When did this break?' or when did it last pass? In systems dependent upon outside components the history can provide a pattern for occasional failures due to factors outside the system under test.
I see that ABAP unit test results can be added into the Code Inspector under the Check Variant.
1. Is it common or recomended to use the Code Inspector (SCI) to store AUnit test results?
2. Is it common or recomended to use Code Inspector Object variants to collect individual AUnit tests for a regresssion style 'TestSuite'?
3. What reporting or tools exists for Code Inspector history?
4. Is Application Logging the better spot for AUnit results history?
(also posted on the wiki.. apologies - I'm new to the forum and wiki)
Will Loew-Blosser

Code inspector - Release of transport

Hi,
When we release the transport request, default variant of code inspector is executed.
Is there any customization for this ? If yes, were do we do setting for this? I need to use own created variant instead of default.
Regards,,,
Sunil Joyous

Hi,
You can create your own default variant in transaction SCI. If you create a local variant instead of a global one and call it DEFAULT it will be used instead of the standard one.
Regards,
Nick

How to create and transport my own globel check variant for Code Inspector

Hi,
I want to create my own global check variant with Code Inspector, so that I can transport the Variant in other systems, but I can not save my variant whitout registering a SSCR-Key.
Can anybody help me?
Best regards
Marcus

I have solved it myself and will post the solution here soon.

Transport Organizer Syntax Check using the Code Inspector

dear fellows,
i'm facing a problem when i check the syntax of transport. When i'm using the option to check the syntax within the transaction se01 the system starts no longer the extended check but the code inspector.
is there any possibility to turn this code inspector check off and to get the extended syntax check again?
or on the othe hand, which variant is used for the check and is there any possibility to change the variant that is used?
thanks for your answers,
Robert

Nope... this is SAP standard code so I will reply to the OSS and wait for them to come back to you.
Regards
Juan

Code Inspector Issue - "MODIFY - without TRANSPORTING was found in line "

Hi all
I am new to abap and my transports are unable to move further because of code inspector error
"MODIFY - without TRANSPORTING was found in line ". Help me resolve the issue.
For example
LOOP AT i_user_add.
    i_user_add-mandt = sy-mandt.
    MODIFY i_user_add.
ENDLOOP.
<removed_by_moderator>
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Oct 16, 2008 3:23 PM

Hi ,
       while modifying the internal table specify wich field you are modifying
modify <internal table > from <work area> transporting <fields>.
regards
naveen

Code Inspector - DDIC objects

Hi All,
Is there any way in code inspector through which I could check the naming conventions for Tables, Data elements, Domains, Structures etc., according to project requirement( Not for FM, Reports Classes ).
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Venkat

Goto SCI transaction and define a check variant which will examine your code for errors. In this variant you can specify the naming convention for your Local Variables, Global Variables etc. In the same variant you can define the Performance Checks like Loop within a loop, nested selects, security checks, programming conventions etc. Make the variant global so that everybody has access to it.
2. Now you are ready to use this variant. Goto SCII --> Select Single --> Select an entry from the dropdown --> give the corresponding progam name/class name --> Give a variant name under Check Variant.
3. Execute.
4. It will show all the discrepancies in your code from where you can double click and goto the respective line of code and correct the error.
Note that you can also use a STANDARD VARIANT.

CHaRM-Is that possible to create multiple Transport Request in UC

HI Gurus,
Quick question on ur.gent correction using Solution Manager CHaRM in EHP1. Is it possible to create multiple transport request(TR) for single ur.gent correction (UC). DO NOT confuse with transport task.
For example, after I created transport request and developer start working and release the task, realised to add another transport request for same UC. When I tried, it did not create any TR but checked the message found that
Schedule Manager: Monitor
Job Status: Processing completed, but with warnings
Program Name: /TMWFLOW/SCMA_TRORDER_CREATE
Action to be checked: Ur.gent Correction: Create Transport Request
There is already an open request, XXXXXXXXXX, for this project
So only way I can do that I released the TR and able to create another TR.
May be wondering why I need to create another TR, why not create TASK and work on that.
But this is the requirement at our company.
I will appreciate the effort and time to provide me the solution of this.
Thanks
Ava

Hi Ragu,
That's really quick turn around. Unfortunately not able to found whatever you mentioned in your message. Here is detail,
I navigate to Actions - Depending on Status, found the entry as
Trans. Type     StatProf         UserStatus     Seq     Action in SAP Change Manager
SDHF             SDHFHEAD   E0002            10       CREATE_HF
SDHF             SDHFHEAD   E0002            20       CREATE_REQ
SDHF             SDHFHEAD   E0002            30       SAVE_PARTNER
SDHF             SDHFHEAD   E0002            40       SET BO LINKS
Where SDHF - Ur.gent Correction
           E0002 - In Development
           CREATE_HF -        Create an Instance in SAP Change Manager
           CREATE_REQ -     Create Transport Request with Task
           SAVE_PARTNER - Save Partners in Respective Partner Roles
           SET BO LINKS -     Sets Links to Business Objects
I don't see any OPEN_TR.
Any other place need to make change.
Thanks
Ava

How to exclude the standard Include programs in Code Inspector?

I am running code inspector (SCi) on all the development objects using a package. But in certain repository objects standard include programs have been used. I want to exclude the standard include programs while running SCI on the package. What are the ways to achieve this?

Hi,
while defining an object set choose:(in the menu)
Edit - Exclude View Maintenance Function Groups.
This should exclude most or at least some of the includes from being checked.
Kind regards,
Hermann

Multiple transports in Code Inspector object set

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for