Multiple Users/Server Installation

Looking to purchase a copy of CS6 Design Standard but would like to be able to install it on our server to allow more than one person to be able to use it. Do not need multiple copies as usage will be sporadic. Does the standard licence allow this? If not, what are the options?

You should contact customer/sales support to get information regarding multiple user licensing. The standard license for a single user limits the installation/activation to two personal computers of which only one can be in use at any given time. It does not apply to server-based installations as far as I know.

Similar Messages

Multiple App Server on a single host

I have a requirement to have multiple application server installations on a single server. Each installation will support a separate department. In the past each department had their own servers and had full control of their application server.
Would it be possible to create separate unix accounts for each department and install the Oracle Application Server under each separate account?
Will the installations be able to manage/avoid port conflicts? Or would I have to manage the ports manually?

Yes it is possible to have multiple instances of OAS (Oracle Application Server) in the same server, if the server hardware (especially RAM) can support it. The port numbers will be assigned automatically by the OUI (Oracle Universal Installer) for each new instance or you can specify them manually (you didnt say which version of OAS but there is a section in the matching installation guide.
However, consider this....
a) they are all still on the same server and any service interruptions to the server as a whole (e.g. apply patches, need to restart the server, all instances would need to be shut down)
b) These kinds of installations can be a horrible mess to administer
Personally I think a better solution is to separate the physical server using virtualization software e.g. VMware ESX to make separate virtual hosts. Then each virtual host has its own IP address and its own instance. e.g. host1 for department 1, host2 for department 2. Then each virtual host can be shut down, rebooted, patched etc, completely independent of the others.

Which Weblogic server installation do I need??

I need to download and install Oracle 11g Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer (11.1.1.2.0) for Windows 7 Professional. On its main page, Oracle says that I have to download and install Weblogic Server before I can install Forms 11g. When I go to Weblogic Server download page, I see two versions: The package installer (815 MB), and the net installer (40 MB). Which one of them do I need for my purpose? Also, do I need something else (other than the database ofcourse and the Weblogic Server) to download and install before putting Forms 11g?
Thanks

When I go to Weblogic Server download page, I see two versions: The package installer (815 MB), and the net installer (40 MB)?
Both Installer will do the same thing....You can choose any one of them
*"Package Installer":* It's Size will be always much more than the Net-Installer....If you want to Once download the Installer in your PC and then want to run it in separate Boxes again & Again where u may not have Internet connectivity ...then you need to choose "Package Installer". When you run the Package installer, you can also select the specific product components you want to install, thereby also enabling you to minimize the installation footprint.
Downloading the Package installer is recommended if you want to perform multiple WebLogic Server installations at your site. In a typical scenario, you download the Package installer only once, then make it available to each machine on which you wish to have the product installed. (You can run the installer from each machine directly over the local network, or copy the installer onto each machine and run it.)
*"Net Installer":* If you want to install the WebLogic and donot want the Installer keeo with you for future use...This is good. It has 40 MB size ...because this 40MB installer will start Downloading rest of the part of the complete installer from the Oracle N/W on the fly. Unlike the Net installer, the Package installer does not provide for any reduction in download time or the amount of disk space required for the installation files.
Thanks
Jay SenSharma
http://jaysensharma.wordpress.com (WebLogic Wonders Are Here)

Installing ODBC Drivers on a Server with multiple users.

We are trying to install ODBC drivers on our web server and want to know what is the minimum we can install and be able to add a DSN through the MS ODBC Administrator. This is a server that is used by multiple companies and we do not want to do something that will affect them.
The oracle installation does not warn you when it overwrites existing files, which is why we cannot simply install everything. For example, on my test machine it trashed the Java installation without asking or telling me. I discovered it this morning when I tried to go to a site that uses Java. That was a low risk on the SQL server, because we did not have Java installed. Other elements, though, cannot be risked in that fashion. We have to find out what files are required in order to solve the problem.
The oracle installation does not warn you when it overwrites existing files, which is why we cannot simply install everything. For example, on my test machine it trashed the Java installation without asking or telling me. I discovered it this morning when I tried to go to a site that uses Java. That was a low risk on the SQL server, because we did not have Java installed. Other elements, though, cannot be risked in that fashion. We have to find out what files are required in order to solve the problem.
Version 9i on a Windows 2003 Server.

1) I’m not certain about the overwrite vs separate machine. What happened is that it installed its own Java, which was much older than the Java previously installed. Following the oracle installation, internet explorer was no longer able to find Java at all, prompting for a new Java installation. During the installation, no mention was made of the changes that were being made.
2) Each company has its own account on our server, its own instance of the database, etc. nowhere in the oracle release notes or the installer could I find anything that provided for a user-limited installation: it was global. Even though the oracle installation suggested, and I accepted, unique folders for its installation targets, the problems mentioned occurred. The web server it wants to install is not possible to be user-limited: it wanted to take over http for the machine.

Multiple users logged into one server, each users printer has a different name, application needs ONE name to print to.

Multiple users logged into one server, each users printer has a different name, application needs ONE name to print to.
I'm NOT in any way a Terminal Services expert and I need help trying to get an application program working in a multi-user environment.
The issue is that the printer changes for every user that is logged in. The application needs to print NOT to the default printer, but to a "special" printer which is selected in the application... let's call it a label printer to simplify the explanation.
You have your default regular printer, easy for the application to find that one, and then you have a special printer that labels get printed onto. The application needs to know what printer is the label printer. So we allow the user to select that in the
application and the selection is stored in a config file in
C:\ProgramData\mfgr\prog\setting files
I don't have access to the application so I can't change how this works.
In the "regular" world, selecting the label printer driver to use should be per machine, NOT per user. When a new user logs into a machine, the physical printer doesn't go "poof" and a new printer suddenly appear. Same printer for all
users.
Yet in terminal services, the physical machine is "merged" with the virtual machine on the server. And there can be many users logged in at the same time. So each users real machine (and real printer) is injected into the "fake" terminal
services machine. The name of the printers is made unique for each user. So the printers DO go "poof" and change names depending on the user logged into terminal services.
So user "A" logs in and sets up the application to print to "LabelPrinterForUserA" (or whatever the name of the printer happens to be), that setting is stored in the ProgramData subfolder, and all is well. Later, user "B" logs
in, and when they print, the application tries to print to "LabelPrinterForUserA" which doesn't exist for user B or is only accessible by user A. If user B re-configures, that breaks it for user A.
SOLUTION 1: The way that /should/ work (in my mind) is that you define one "generic" printer in Terminal Services... call it "Virtual Label printer" and when the user wants to print to it, the print job gets re-directed back to whatever
physical printer is actually connected to their local workstation. There is a map of virtual printer to actual printer depending on the current user. The application is told once to print to "Virtual Label Printer" for all users.
SOLUTION 2: Or... there should be some way to make the ProgramData sub folders separate per user. E.g. when user "A" tries to access:
C:\ProgramData\mfgr\prog\setting files
they actually get
C:\UserData\UserA\AppData\mfgr\prog\setting files
and user "B" gets
C:\UserData\UserB\AppData\mfgr\prog\setting files
So the question I have is: Does either of those solutions exist hidden somewhere in the setup of terminal server? Or is there another way around this issue that I don't know?

I don't really have a "for sure" answer to this, but because people here can't seem to deal with a question that hasn't been answered I'll provide the best answer I did receive from ServerFault.com user Nathan:
I can feel your pain with using old software on terminal servers ...the solution I've come up with definitely won't scale as it requires some manual configuration, but I've gotten this method to work with our label printers (which require to be
printed to an LPT port...yep, that old).
Share your USB-connected printers to the network on each machine. Then, have the user log in on aunique session for each of them
(a TS account cannot be shared among computers for this to work) and install a network printer pointing to the USB one they shared. Try to use a DNS name to account for possible DHCP movements.
After, it should work. Each user can do this since display names can be identical as long as the ports are different (which they are).
This was clarified by the following series of comments:
I think you are on to something here, and I originally advised the admin to do this. The problem he ran into is that it setup the printer names in the TS as "printer on usersworkstation"
and he could not rename it except to change the "printer" to whatever. E.g. the "on userworkstation" remained. I believe there is another way of installing the printer which avoids this, but I can't find it. Ages ago, one used to do NET
USE LPT2 \\computer\printer password /USER:domain\user /PERSISTENT:YES and then tell the driver to print to LPT2 –  James
Newton Mar
17 at 16:21
@JamesNewton That's actually the exact method we used. The way around the "network printer" part is to install it as local printer and map it to a TCP/IP port that way. –  Nathan
C Mar
17 at 16:28
You mean in the case where the printers are TCP/IP connected and not local USB / LPT to the users workstation? That makes sense. Wonder if this will work for USB connected printers... –  James
NewtonMar
17 at 16:35
@JamesNewton You'd share the local printer on the client's PC then on the server connect via TCP/IP to it. You'd need static addresses or use DNS names if DHCP, though. –  Nathan
C Mar
17 at 16:51
Ah. Yes. I see. Looks like the LPT thing should work even with a USB connected printer:superuser.com/questions/182655/… –  James
Newton Mar
17 at 17:09

Multiple users on the same ODI installation?

Hi all
is it possible to have multiple users working with the same odi installation? We have a virtualized IT infrastructure (citrix and wmware) where we can have multiple users on the same virtual instance. From our point of view, there is no licencing issue since we have a package covering literally everything.
One of the issues are the config files stored in the installation directory of odi (../bin). Is there a way to tell odi to store them in a different location, eg. the user home?
Thanks a lot
Benno

ODI looks in the current working directory for the configuration files, mostly you would have issues with the snps_login_work.xml and snps_login_security.xml files, but these may be common across all users. (just don't store the username/passwords for the ODI users in them).
The way ODI works, most of what are creating is stored in the repository anyway, it is only local GUI config stuff that may be stored locally.
Short answer, yes, you can, but might need to modify the config files a little to make it work.

How to make Adobe acrobat feature to convert SAP Pages to PDF available for multiple users connected to the same Citrix server

Hi,
In my previous endeavours to solve this business requirement where multiple users will be able to use the Adobe acrobat feature to convert SAP pages inside SAP to PDF, I was told that it is not possible to do this for multiple users at the same time. However I have found an article according to which it says it is possible. Could you check it once and let me know if this article can be used for implementing the requirement stated above as this link clearly indicates that Adobe Acrobat is supported on Citrix.
Please find the link below where it states it is adobe acrobat is supported in Citrix for multiple users.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/acrobatetk/tools/AdminGuide/citrix.html.

1. What is the Acrobat feature that you mean? There's nothing specific to SAP included with Acrobat.
2. Yes, some Terminal Server configurations appear supported (check carefully). All users of the terminal server will need a license, so far as I know - total licenses = total individual people using.

Start multiple domains simultaneously on 1 Weblogic server installation?

Is it okay to start and run multiple domains simultaneously. Better yet, when having multiple domains on 1 WLS server, should each domain have a different port number in order to be run simultaneously?
Here's my scenario - I installed Oracle Business Intellgence, which by default installs and configures WLS server for certain Business Intelligence applications (BI Publisher). This instance was running fine and good and still is.
Then I had another application, Oracle Data Integrator, which has a Console piece that requires a domain on WLS. So instead of modifying the existing domain for Oracle Business Intelligence, I created a new domain via the Configuration Wizard and selected those components for Oracle Data Integrator.
therefore current domains:
...\domains\bifoundation_domain --> installed automatically as part of Oracle Business Intelligence
...\domains\odi11g --> I created this domain after I
Now I have 2 domains under 1 WLS Server (windows 7 64bit), but if I startWeblogic.cmd for the bifoundation_domain, and I startWeblogic.cmd for the odi11g...then only the components for the bifoundation_domain become available via the WLS Console.
Questions:
- Can I run both domains simultaneously?
- Should I have modified the bifoundation_domain to include Oracle Data Integrator component; therefore only having 1 domain but having everything run under that domain?
- Does the Port for each domain matter? both bifounddation_domain and odi11g domain use ports 7001
Are there any other considerations? Thanks much.

Hi,
It is perfectly OK to run multiple domains on a single Weblogic server installation. Only constraint would be you have enough capacity available on your server to start multiple instances.
Things to note is, if your domain1 is running on listen address : port { localhost : 7001 } then your other domain should be configured on a different port say {localhost : 8001 }. If you want both domain to run on same port then go for virtual IP's to be plumbed on your physical network interface and configure as,
domain1 - { ip1 : 7001 }
domain2 - { ip2 : 7001 }
this way you will can access both domain admin console on same port.
Remember, Weblogic resources cannot be shared between domain, however a single nodemanager will be enough to monitor both the domains.
* rank it if answer is helpful :) *
Thanks,
Ranjan

Add multiple users to a certain database in the SQL server in one go

I wonder if there is any method to add multiple users to a certain database in the SQL server in one go and without using transact code.
I can add a single user to a certain database “Q” for example by right click on the user “U1” for example then properties then in user mapping tab select
the database “Q”, so there should be a method to add multiple users ( U1,U2,U3…) to this database?
Best Regards,
Ahmad

Many thanks Visakh16,
I can do this using the below script, but what I am searching for is do to this without any scripting.
USE TestDatabase; --Make sure you have the right database
DECLARE @sql VARCHAR(MAX) = '';
SELECT @sql = @sql + 'CREATE USER ' + name + ' FOR LOGIN ' + name + ';
' +
'GRANT CREATE TABLE, CREATE PROCEDURE, CREATE VIEW, VIEW DEFINITION TO ' + name + ';
FROM sys.server_principals p
WHERE p.type in ('S','U') -- SQL Logins and Windows Login. Do not change!
and p.name in ('U1','U2','U3'); -- List of names to add. alter to suit
PRINT @sql; -- Show the statements being executed in the messages pane
EXEC(@sql); -- Run the statements that have been built
Thanks,
Ahmad

Multiple Users on a Mac OS X server

Hello everyone,
I was recently given the responsibility for a departments Mac OS X server since I have a Linux/BSD/Unix background.
Each semester requires a between 75 to 100 new users to be added to this departments server.
I would like to find a script that is Mac specific that would allow multiple users to be added to the system.
Does anyone have suggestions or good links?

Passenger is v cool and easy but is not free.
If you're on a tight budget check Appendix A of UserManagement_Adminv10.4B.pdf at http://www.apple.com/server/documentation/
hth,
b.

Multiple users working using the server from laptops

Hello everyone.
We have a Mac Mini Server in the house, and a couple of Mac laptops.
I know that using screen sharing I can control the server from a laptop. However, when doing this whoever is physically sitting at the server will see their mouse possessed and not be able to do their own thing on the server.
Given the fact that we have multiple users, would it be possible to have multiple people use their laptops to view the desktop of the server as they work on it, while logged in to their own individual user accounts, and control the server independently through those accounts?
Not sure if that description was clear or not, but I think you'll get my gist. Basically I want to use the laptops as thin clients to work using the server. Also key is that multiple people be able to do this at the same time.
Thanks for any suggestions!

The Mac OS X graphical interface is a single-seat design. One Mac, one seat.
There is no analog to Microsoft Windows Terminal Services, nor to multiple sessions on Windows XP Pro or analogous, nor multi-seat X Windows, nor to Thin Clients, with Mac OS X nor Mac OS X Server, short of the add-on package Aqua Connect or analogous.
One of the usual mechanisms for controlling a Mac OS X Server is via the Server Admin tools. These are independent.
Command-level management operations are also available via ssh and analogous. You can ssh into the server and manage many of the aspects of Mac OS X client and Mac OS X Server from the command line. These are fully independent sessions.
Typical Mac OS X Server doesn't require all that much management, and it's probably not the best to have an interactive user operating on a server box regardless. This because servers typically support multiple users, so outages and reboots and operational errors and crashes will effect more than just the user in the seat at the server.

Multiple Users - Concurrent Software Development on X Server

How can I setup the X Server to allow for multiple users to connect and concurrently do development activity (use iPhone SDK for developing applications) activities?

Oké, I will give it a try.
X server, you mean MacosX server or really X server?
However this hangs to development, I guess you should ask this in the unix forum.
I do use MacosX server, but actually, don't `need` it for the development itself. You can use it for sharing of documents with afp smb etc, but you can do that with a client too. If people are outside of your LAN, then set up a VPN.
Keep control who may logon and then they work as if it was local.
I did use VPN, but for now I did turn it off. Did mess up with a few things. :-/
What I still do,
Docs like UML, tech docs, images, which all are project in-depended and taken from the web or from a third party, I share those via AFP.
Project independed documents, drawing etc, and documents that a project member or I did wrote are checked in by the writer at a svn server, and are semi automatic checked out to the afp share.
Project depended documents, drawing etc, and documents that a project member or I did wrote are checked in by the writer at a svn server, and can be checked out locally at will of the developer.
The same with the xCode personal setting, found at
/Users/<developer>/Library/Application Support/Developer/Shared/...
and
/Users/<developer>/Library/Application Support/Developer/3.2/...
/Users/<developer>/Library/Application Support/Developer/3.1/...
( I use the later ones on when I am not sure if my templates or whatever is not versions wide compatible ). They are accepted by xcode.
I will ( still busy with that ) sync parts of that with the server, but I use a sync application for that. Still no need for macosx server.
But like the scripts.plist, it dangerous to just sync that file, when more people add scripts on that file between syncs.
So because macosx client can do afp shares and you need a svn server ( I use Subversion ), it is no demand to have a macosX server.
If you want to do timesharing for compiling than just install a xcode on your 'server' and leave it running and set the setting under the 'distribution build' tab in the xcode preferences. I did use this only one time, so no real experience.
At the beginning it is hard to manage, but after a period when things get settled it good to be there.
HTH
If you mean something differently then someone else can fill in. and am also curious how other people or groups are doing this.
For the specific things like VPN, I guess you have to loo at the unix or networking forum

The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file. Does Snow Leopard Server File Sharing (AFP) provide similar features?

The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file. Does File Sharing (AFP) on Snow Leopard Server provide similar services?

Were you ever able to solve this problem. I'm having similar issues since upgrading to snow leopard. Four macs connect to a Windows Server 2003 for shared files. Each user has full permissions & when we "get info" it shows read & write permissions. Two of the computers were running 10.4, two were running 10.5. Everything worked properly until upgrading to snow leopard. Some files let me copy, move, delete. Others either just hang up or we get a "no permission" error. Also getting a "pdf is in use" error, even when the file/folder doesn't contain a pdf. We had our IT rep check the server who said everything is in working order. They don't represent macs any longer but feel that it's a mac problem. I would have to agree since this problem only started after the upgrade, and the one machine that was not upgraded (still running 10.5.8) is not dealing with these problems.
Lastly, I would install 10.5 back on all of the computers if I could, but the leopard disk that came with one of the computers wouldn't work with the 2 machines running 10.4 and I didn't see it available at the apple store. I'll buy it if it's still available, but why wouldn't the disks that I have work?
Thanks for any help

Can multiple users complete a form on a company server concurrently?

I would like to be able to create forms and distribute them via SharePoint but allow multiple users to complete the forms at the same time. Is this possible or can a form only be completed by a single individual at a time?

How were you planning to submit/process the form data? Most methods would be fine because they do not touch the original, which can have unlimited read-only copies.

SQL SERVER INSTALLATION FAILS AND I TRIED SO MANY TIMES TO INSTALL AFTER UNSINSTALLATION , BUT IT SEEMS WORTHLESS.KINDLY SUGGEST ME .

Overall summary:
Final result: Failed: see details below
Exit code (Decimal): -2147467259
Start time: 2015-02-16 10:35:41
End time: 2015-02-16 11:15:03
Requested action: Install
Setup completed with required actions for features.
Troubleshooting information for those features:
Next step for SSMS: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Next step for BIDS: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Next step for RS: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Next step for SQLEngine: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Next step for FullText: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Next step for Replication: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Machine Properties:
Machine name: ABHI
Machine processor count: 4
OS version: Future Windows Version
OS service pack:
OS region: United States
OS language: English (United States)
OS architecture: x64
Process architecture: 64 Bit
OS clustered: No
Product features discovered:
Product Instance Instance ID Feature
Language Edition Version Clustered
Package properties:
Description: Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Service Pack 1
ProductName: SQL Server 2012
Type: RTM
Version: 11
SPLevel: 0
Installation location: f:\33ee254b43729031825c982f\x64\setup\
Installation edition: Express
Product Update Status:
None discovered.
User Input Settings:
ACTION: Install
ADDCURRENTUSERASSQLADMIN: true
AGTSVCACCOUNT: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE
AGTSVCPASSWORD: *****
AGTSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Disabled
ASBACKUPDIR: Backup
ASCOLLATION: Latin1_General_CI_AS
ASCONFIGDIR: Config
ASDATADIR: Data
ASLOGDIR: Log
ASPROVIDERMSOLAP: 1
ASSERVERMODE: MULTIDIMENSIONAL
ASSVCACCOUNT: <empty>
ASSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
ASSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Automatic
ASSYSADMINACCOUNTS: <empty>
ASTEMPDIR: Temp
BROWSERSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Disabled
CLTCTLRNAME: <empty>
CLTRESULTDIR: <empty>
CLTSTARTUPTYPE: 0
CLTSVCACCOUNT: <empty>
CLTSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
CLTWORKINGDIR: <empty>
COMMFABRICENCRYPTION: 0
COMMFABRICNETWORKLEVEL: 0
COMMFABRICPORT: 0
CONFIGURATIONFILE:
CTLRSTARTUPTYPE: 0
CTLRSVCACCOUNT: <empty>
CTLRSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
CTLRUSERS: <empty>
ENABLERANU: true
ENU: true
ERRORREPORTING: true
FEATURES: SQLENGINE, REPLICATION, FULLTEXT, RS, BIDS, BOL, SSMS, SNAC_SDK, LOCALDB
FILESTREAMLEVEL: 0
FILESTREAMSHARENAME: <empty>
FTSVCACCOUNT: NT Service\MSSQLFDLauncher
FTSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
HELP: false
IACCEPTSQLSERVERLICENSETERMS: false
INDICATEPROGRESS: false
INSTALLSHAREDDIR: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\
INSTALLSHAREDWOWDIR: C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SQL Server\
INSTALLSQLDATADIR: <empty>
INSTANCEDIR: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\
INSTANCEID: MSSQLSERVER
INSTANCENAME: MSSQLSERVER
ISSVCACCOUNT: NT AUTHORITY\Network Service
ISSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
ISSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Automatic
MATRIXCMBRICKCOMMPORT: 0
MATRIXCMSERVERNAME: <empty>
MATRIXNAME: <empty>
NPENABLED: 0
PID: *****
QUIET: false
QUIETSIMPLE: false
ROLE: AllFeatures_WithDefaults
RSINSTALLMODE: DefaultNativeMode
RSSHPINSTALLMODE: DefaultSharePointMode
RSSVCACCOUNT: NT Service\ReportServer
RSSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
RSSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Automatic
SAPWD: *****
SECURITYMODE: SQL
SQLBACKUPDIR: <empty>
SQLCOLLATION: SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
SQLSVCACCOUNT: NT Service\MSSQLSERVER
SQLSVCPASSWORD: <empty>
SQLSVCSTARTUPTYPE: Automatic
SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS: ABHI\abhi24
SQLTEMPDBDIR: <empty>
SQLTEMPDBLOGDIR: <empty>
SQLUSERDBDIR: <empty>
SQLUSERDBLOGDIR: <empty>
SQMREPORTING: true
TCPENABLED: 0
UIMODE: AutoAdvance
UpdateEnabled: true
UpdateSource: MU
X86: false
Configuration file: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20150216_102728\ConfigurationFile.ini
Detailed results:
Feature: Management Tools - Basic
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred for a dependency of the feature causing the setup process for the feature to fail.
Next Step: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Component name: SQL Server Common Files
Component error code: 0x84BB0001
Error description: The MOF compiler could not connect with the WMI server. This is either because of a semantic error such as an incompatibility with the existing WMI repository or an actual error such as the
failure of the WMI server to start.
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=11.0.3128.0&EvtType=0xA60E3551%400xD3BEBD98%401211%401&EvtType=0xA60E3551%400xD3BEBD98%401211%401
Feature: SQL Server Data Tools
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred for a dependency of the feature causing the setup process for the feature to fail.
Next Step: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Component name: SQL Server Common Files
Component error code: 0x84BB0001
Error description: The MOF compiler could not connect with the WMI server. This is either because of a semantic error such as an incompatibility with the existing WMI repository or an actual error such as the
failure of the WMI server to start.
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=11.0.3128.0&EvtType=0xA60E3551%400xD3BEBD98%401211%401&EvtType=0xA60E3551%400xD3BEBD98%401211%401
Feature: Reporting Services - Native
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred for a dependency of the feature causing the setup process for the feature to fail.
Next Step: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Component name: SQL Server Common Files
Component error code: 0x84BB0001
Error description: The MOF compiler could not connect with the WMI server. This is either because of a semantic error such as an incompatibility with the existing WMI repository or an actual error such as the
failure of the WMI server to start.
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=11.0.3128.0&EvtType=0xA60E3551%400xD3BEBD98%401211%401&EvtType=0xA60E3551%400xD3BEBD98%401211%401
Feature: Database Engine Services
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred during the setup process of the feature.
Next Step: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Component name: SQL Server Database Engine Services Instance Features
Component error code: 0x80004005
Error description: The system cannot find the path specified
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=11.0.3128.0&EvtType=0xF57C3D6F%400xDC80C325&EvtType=0xF57C3D6F%400xDC80C325
Feature: Full-Text and Semantic Extractions for Search
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred for a dependency of the feature causing the setup process for the feature to fail.
Next Step: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Component name: SQL Server Database Engine Services Instance Features
Component error code: 0x80004005
Error description: The system cannot find the path specified
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=11.0.3128.0&EvtType=0xF57C3D6F%400xDC80C325&EvtType=0xF57C3D6F%400xDC80C325
Feature: SQL Server Replication
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred for a dependency of the feature causing the setup process for the feature to fail.
Next Step: Use the following information to resolve the error, uninstall this feature, and then run the setup process again.
Component name: SQL Server Database Engine Services Instance Features
Component error code: 0x80004005
Error description: The system cannot find the path specified
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=11.0.3128.0&EvtType=0xF57C3D6F%400xDC80C325&EvtType=0xF57C3D6F%400xDC80C325
Feature: SQL Browser
Status: Passed
Feature: Documentation Components
Status: Passed
Feature: SQL Writer
Status: Passed
Feature: LocalDB
Status: Passed
Feature: SQL Client Connectivity
Status: Passed
Feature: SQL Client Connectivity SDK
Status: Passed
Rules with failures:
Global rules:
Scenario specific rules:
Rules report file: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Setup Bootstrap\Log\20150216_102728\SystemConfigurationCheck_Report.htm

Hi,
It seems to me like you have
1. Previous failed instance of SQL Server installation which subsequently caused further SQL Server installations to fail
2. The windows account with which you logged into machine to install SQL Server is corrupt
You can, If possible create a new windows account give it admin privileges and then log into machine using this account
After you login follow below method to remove failed SQL Server installation
Uninstall
Uninstall SQL Server completely from add remove program. Make sure no previous failed installation fragments are present on your system. Please use this
link for uninstalling existing instance of SQL Server
. If you have SQL Server 2005
use this link .
If you are unable to uninstall SQL Server completely because you deleted SQL Server files and un-installation is giving error please follow below method. This method is tested and suggested on
this thread and
Forum .
Below Solution (about removing reg keys) will work correctly for SQL Server having Just one instance.
If you have multiple instances and you have messed up SQL Server installation please contact Microsoft Support personal to get better guidance on removal of SQL Server. Please DONT use this method if you are new to SQL Server take help of experienced
DBA to locate proper registry keys and remove them if you are not confident at all it would be better calling Microsoft Support.
Note: Removing necessary registry entries might cause SQL Server instance to crash so backup registry before doing changes.
1. Uninstall the existing SQL Server and all the components from the add remove program.
2.
Backup the registry .
3. Delete the following keys using regedit:
--HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server
--HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MSSQLServer
4. Go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall and delete all the sub-keys referencing SQL Server.
5. Go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services and delete all the keys referencing SQL Server.
6. Rename all the SQL Server folders in the computer.
7. Reboot the machine.
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it
My Technet Wiki Article
MVP

Multiple Users/Server Installation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for