Multisim 11 only uses one CPU core during simulation

Hi,
Just recently I've been using MultiSim again, v11 if that matters, and simulating goes slow, to my opinion that is.
Now there are two things that I've noticed:
- Multisim only uses one of two CPU cores during simulation, not both;
- I've enabled CPU throttle (AMD's Cool'n'Quiet) but corespeed remains very low even though Multisim needs CPU power while simulating.
The simulating of a NE555-based LED-flash circuit requires about 28 seconds to get to 100ms in the simulation. Now if I can get the CPU to throttle up, by for example having Prime95 stress one of the two cores, then the simulation only requires 12 seconds to get to 100ms.
So here are my two questions:
1. Is Multisim 11 capable of using more than one CPU core while simulating? If yes, how can I get it to use more than one?
2. Probably not the right forum to ask, but is there a way to force Windows 7 Ultimate x64 to throttle up the CPU when Multisim starts simulating? Since Multisim does not seem to stress the only core it uses enough to throttle it up. Using Prime95 on one core does trigger a throttle up.
With regards,
Bart Grefte
Relevant specs:
Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Multisim v11
AMD A4-3400
16GB RAM

Completely forgot this topic....
Is there a good reason why there is no multicore support? Multisim can certainly use it for simulating.
As for the CPU throttling, I found a batch that can increase/decrease the "minimum processor state"-setting and it works immediately, no reboot required.
@echo off
powercfg.exe -getactivescheme > "%userprofile%\appdata\~apo.tmp"
set /p v_currentscheme= <"%userprofile%\appdata\~apo.tmp"
set v_currentscheme=%v_currentscheme:~24,36%
del "%userprofile%\appdata\~apo.tmp"
powercfg -setacvalueindex %v_currentscheme% 54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00 893dee8e-2bef-41e0-89c6-b55d0929964c %1
powercfg -setdcvalueindex %v_currentscheme% 54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00 893dee8e-2bef-41e0-89c6-b55d0929964c %1
powercfg -s %v_currentscheme%
exit
Usage is simple:
Start -> run -> c:\pathtobatch.bat 100
for "minimum processor state"-setting at 100%
Start -> run -> c:\pathtobatch.bat 5
for "minimum processor state"-setting at 5%
Please note that "set v_currentscheme=%v_currentscheme:~24,36%" is not the same for every language. The original batch had "set v_currentscheme=%v_currentscheme:~19,36%" (most likely for the English version of Windows 7), but since my Windows install is in Dutch, I had to change it in order for it to work.
Running the batch with @echo off removed will show why.

Similar Messages

  • Why only using one CPU

    Just noticed when importing CD into iTunes on my MacBook is only uses one cpu, with activity monitor it show 98-100% CPU and never goes over 100%
    My fans also run when importing, I use lossless.
    Why not use more CPU speed?
    R

    I believe only applications writen to do so will take advantage of dual processors. I guess iTunes has not yet been updated for dual processor use.
    Patrick

  • Pages '09 only uses one processor core?

    Hello,
    some days ago i had to open a document containing nearly 2.000 pages. Don't ask why.
    Working with this document was quite complicated because Pages was responding very slowly. I used the activity monitor to see what was going on and i recognized that Pages only uses one core of my eight core MacPro.
    I tested iWork on my iMac and MacBook Pro (both DualCores) as well: same problem.
    Does iWork only use one processor core?
    Kind regards,
    roman

    How much memory do you have in your system? I'll bet if you check activity monitor (applications/utilities) and go to system memory tab therein you will see lots of page outs. This happens with huge docs and little memory as the doc is being swapped between active operating memory and the hard disk The only way to solve this problem is to get more memory (not storage) in your system. For a 2,000 page doc you're going to need lots and lots and lots of extra gigs of memory. By the way - how big is the too big file of yours?
    Number of processor cores isn't going to solve the issue if you have pageouts. It is a system memory/size of document issue and completely unrelated to how many processor cores you are using.

  • AME is only using one processing core out of six.

    I have not been able to figure out why AME is only using one of the six processing cores that I have in my Core i7 hex core processor.  I'm running Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit and the latest version of AME 2014 CC.  When I render in Premiere Pro CC 2014 all cores are utilized.  The codec that I'm using in AME is "YouTube SD 480P 29.97 - H.264".  The video that is being encoded is fairly complex but it is only 30 minutes long and AME is estimating 18 hours to completion.  That seems pretty excessive for that length of video.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    This forum post may be related to your question. 
    Re: AME CC2014 Very Slow Encoding

  • Only one CPU core recognized [solved]

    For some reason the kernel only recognizes one CPU core out of two. I'm not completely sure at which kernel upgrade it disappeared but it is gone in 2.6.36 and 2.6.37. I know it was still there in september 2010 and earlier. I'm using a x86-64 kernel.
    cat /proc/cpuinfo:
    processor    : 0
    vendor_id    : AuthenticAMD
    cpu family    : 16
    model        : 6
    model name    : AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor
    stepping    : 2
    cpu MHz        : 2913.253
    cache size    : 1024 KB
    fpu        : yes
    fpu_exception    : yes
    cpuid level    : 5
    wp        : yes
    flags        : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc up rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc extd_apicid pni monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skinit wdt npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save
    bogomips    : 5828.27
    TLB size    : 1024 4K pages
    clflush size    : 64
    cache_alignment    : 64
    address sizes    : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate
    Motherboard is: Gigabyte MA770T-UD3P. I use the latest bios.
    I have tried adding the kernel options "acpi=off noacpi apic=off noapic" as to the suggestion of a ubuntu bug report in launchpad but it didn't help. I also disabled ACPI in the bios but I'm still limited to one cpu core.
    Any ideas?
    [SOLVED]
    I just doublechecked the BIOS settings and it had the CPU Core Control set to manual and one core was disabled. I set it to auto again and now both cores are recognized correctly. I don't recall ever touching this setting but at least it works now. Maybe a bios update actually changed the setting or (more probable) a friend of mine.
    Last edited by Baraclese (2011-01-17 19:01:02)

    JOhnLiu wrote:
    thanks for reply sb92075
    [root@localhost ~]# mpstat -P ALL 2
    Linux 2.6.18-164.el5 (localhost.localdomain)    09/12/12
    09:29:09     CPU   %user   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal   %idle    intr/s
    09:29:11     all    0.01    0.00    1.27    0.01    0.00    0.01    0.00   98.69   1658.29
    09:29:11       0    0.50    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.50    0.00   98.99   1657.29
    09:29:11      73    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11      74    0.00    0.00  100.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00      0.00
    09:29:11      75    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11      76    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00I think you don't understand what i mean .
    there just have ONLY ONE CORE %sys 100
    the top command show average of all cpu core sys% usage
    when the one core sys% is 100%
    the system are very slow .
    e.g: when I create a database instance used for a long time . over 2 hours
    but generally it will be done at most 1 hours or shorteris any type of OS virtualization involved in this environment?

  • Only one CPU core high sys usage when create database instance via dbca

    when using dbca to create database instance
    JUST ONLY ONE CPU core high sys usage
    how to troubleshoot it
    see this:
    top - 09:28:19 up 55 days, 20:38, 10 users,  load average: 1.00, 1.08, 1.31
    Tasks: 1231 total,   2 running, 1228 sleeping,   0 stopped,   1 zombie
    Cpu(s):  0.0%us,  1.3%sy,  0.0%ni, 98.7%id,  0.0%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,  0.0%st
    Mem:  57588328k total, 55028620k used,  2559708k free,   196852k buffers
    Swap: 16386292k total,    23156k used, 16363136k free, 23011232k cached
      PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND                                                                                        
    11343 oracle    25   0 1771m  30m  23m R 99.7  0.1   5:36.39 oracle                                                                                         
    3692 oracle    16   0 13948 2348  816 S  1.6  0.0  17:00.94 top                                                                                            
    11432 root      15   0 13540 2024  820 R  1.3  0.0   0:00.21 top                                                                                            
    11034 oracle    16   0  737m 171m  33m S  0.3  0.3   0:52.39 java                                                                                           
    11435 oracle    15   0 66056 1596 1180 S  0.3  0.0   0:00.01 bash                                                                                           
        1 root      15   0   784  172  160 S  0.0  0.0  38:56.76 init                                                                                           
        2 root      RT  -5     0    0    0 S  0.0  0.0   0:00.58 migration/0                                                                                    
        3 root      34  19     0    0    0 S  0.0  0.0   0:00.75 ksoftirqd/0                                                                                    
        4 root      RT  -5     0    0    0 S  0.0  0.0   0:00.00 watchdog/0                                                                                     
        5 root      RT  -5     0    0    0 S  0.0  0.0   0:00.81 migration/1                                                                                    
        6 root      34  19     0    0    0 S  0.0  0.0   0:00.00 ksoftirqd/1                                                                                    
        7 root      RT  -5     0    0    0 S  0.0  0.0   0:00.00 watchdog/1                                                                                     
        8 root      RT  -5     0    0    0 S  0.0  0.0   0:02.53 migration/2    mpstat info
    [root@localhost ~]# mpstat -P ALL 2
    Linux 2.6.18-164.el5 (localhost.localdomain)    09/12/12
    09:29:09     CPU   %user   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal   %idle    intr/s
    09:29:11     all    0.01    0.00    1.27    0.01    0.00    0.01    0.00   98.69   1658.29
    09:29:11       0    0.50    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.50    0.00   98.99   1657.29
    09:29:11      73    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11      74    0.00    0.00  100.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00      0.00
    09:29:11      75    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11      76    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11      77    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11      78    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11      79    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11     CPU   %user   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal   %idle    intr/s
    09:29:13     all    0.01    0.00    1.26    0.01    0.00    0.02    0.00   98.70   1761.19
    09:29:13       0    0.50    0.00    0.50    1.00    0.00    1.99    0.00   96.02   1761.19
    09:29:13      71    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:13      72    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:13      73    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:13      74    0.00    0.00  100.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00      0.00
    09:29:13      75    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:13      76    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:13      77    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:13      78    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:13      79    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00          you can see there is only one CPU CORE (core 74 but is random , other core have same status but just one CPU core)
    [root@localhost ~]# vmstat -S m 2
    procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------
    r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa st
    3  0     23   1861    203  24267    0    0     8    12    0    0  0  0 99  0  0
    4  0     23   1845    203  24262    0    0   602 16460 3682 8121  2  2 96  1  0
    3  0     23   1842    203  24276    0    0   692  7520 3297 6610  2  2 97  0  0
    3  0     23   1830    203  24277    0    0   786  3040 3302 7118  2  2 97  0  0
    4  0     23   1829    203  24277    0    0   126  3144 3247 7343  2  1 97  0  0
    3  0     23   1827    203  24279    0    0    76  2944 3292 7502  2  2 96  0  0
    3  0     23   1823    203  24281    0    0     0  3248 3164 7656  2  1 97  0  0
    2  0     23   1827    203  24279    0    0     0  3646 3080 7480  2  1 97  0  0
    2  0     23   1828    203  24279    0    0     0   476 2942 5648  1  1 98  0  0
    3  0     23   1824    203  24281    0    0     2  7476 3377 8111  2  2 97  0  0iostat infor
    avg-cpu:  %user   %nice %system %iowait  %steal   %idle
               1.28    0.00    1.29    0.00    0.00   97.43
    Device:            tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
    hda               0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda               5.47         0.00        83.58          0        168
    sda1              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda2              5.47         0.00        83.58          0        168
    sda3              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda4              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda5              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sdb               8.96         0.00       123.38          0        248
    sdb1              8.96         0.00       123.38          0        248
    avg-cpu:  %user   %nice %system %iowait  %steal   %idle
               1.27    0.00    1.27    0.00    0.00   97.46
    Device:            tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
    hda               0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda               0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda1              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda2              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda3              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda4              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda5              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sdb              17.50         0.00       236.00          0        472
    sdb1             17.50         0.00       236.00          0        472
    avg-cpu:  %user   %nice %system %iowait  %steal   %idle
               1.29    0.00    1.30    0.01    0.00   97.41
    Device:            tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
    hda               0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda               0.50         0.00        16.00          0         32
    sda1              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda2              0.50         0.00        16.00          0         32
    sda3              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda4              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sda5              0.00         0.00         0.00          0          0
    sdb               7.50         0.00       144.00          0        288
    sdb1              7.50         0.00       144.00          0        288more detail:
    database version 11.2.0.2.0
    system version
    [root@localhost ~]# cat /etc/issue
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga)
    Kernel \r on an \m
    [root@localhost ~]# lsb_release
    LSB Version:    :core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch
    [root@localhost ~]# uname -a
    Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-164.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 18 15:51:48 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linuxhardware info
    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 6
    model           : 47
    model name      :        Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4860  @ 2.27GHz
    stepping        : 2
    cpu MHz         : 2261.057
    cache size      : 24576 KB
    physical id     : 3
    siblings        : 20
    core id         : 18
    cpu cores       : 10
    apicid          : 229
    fpu             : yes
    fpu_exception   : yes
    cpuid level     : 11
    wp              : yes
    flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc ida nonstop_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 cx16 xtpr popcnt lahf_lm
    bogomips        : 4522.11
    clflush size    : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes   : 44 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    [root@localhost ~]# free -m
                 total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
    Mem:         56238      55892        346          0        196      23645
    -/+ buffers/cache:      32050      24188
    Swap:        16002         22      15979
    [root@localhost ~]# df -h
    Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    /dev/sda2              19G  4.9G   14G  27% /
    /dev/sda5             230G   27G  192G  12% /home
    /dev/sda1              99M   12M   83M  13% /boot
    /dev/sdb1             2.9T  2.3T  464G  84% /arrayEdited by: JOhnLiu on Sep 11, 2012 7:31 PM

    JOhnLiu wrote:
    thanks for reply sb92075
    [root@localhost ~]# mpstat -P ALL 2
    Linux 2.6.18-164.el5 (localhost.localdomain)    09/12/12
    09:29:09     CPU   %user   %nice    %sys %iowait    %irq   %soft  %steal   %idle    intr/s
    09:29:11     all    0.01    0.00    1.27    0.01    0.00    0.01    0.00   98.69   1658.29
    09:29:11       0    0.50    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.50    0.00   98.99   1657.29
    09:29:11      73    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11      74    0.00    0.00  100.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00      0.00
    09:29:11      75    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00
    09:29:11      76    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00    0.00  100.00      0.00I think you don't understand what i mean .
    there just have ONLY ONE CORE %sys 100
    the top command show average of all cpu core sys% usage
    when the one core sys% is 100%
    the system are very slow .
    e.g: when I create a database instance used for a long time . over 2 hours
    but generally it will be done at most 1 hours or shorteris any type of OS virtualization involved in this environment?

  • Cc2014 not using all CPU cores or GPU

    I'm using the new CC2014, and I exported a project straight out of Premiere and it utilized all 8 of my CPU and my GPU. When I export using Adobe Media Encoder, it only uses one core and doesn't seem to use the GPU at all. I tried changing the setting to from GPU to software only, and it didn't seem to make a difference.

    Just found out, that drag and drop PPro Sequences into AME seems to be a work-around.Plus unchecking the "Import Sequences Natively" in AME.
    Well, ..indeed it worked. Not very convenient though and it's a bug that's been around for a while (7 month!! according to some users).
    Please fix this, cannot be too hard, can it?
    What bothers me even more is a still low CPU usage of around 35% over all when exporting....
    My system:
    i7-5930K @ 4.40GHz (overclocked)
    Gigabyte GTX 770 GB
    SSD cache drive
    HDD-RAID0 assets drive
    Windows 8.1

  • IMovie only using 50% CPU power

    Hi,
    When I export my project in iMovie my CPU usage holds at 50%. I accept this does mean I can do other things but would like the export to go faster.
    Is this usual for iMovie to only use 50% CPU (and only about 1gb of RAM (of 8gb)) or do I need to do something?
    New to Macs so any help appreciated.
    dcbevan

    Hi
    As I get it - Doesn't iMovie take full use of multiple core processors. Not even Pro
    applications does this to 100%
    BUT
    RAM - iMovie or FinalCut are not that RAM hungry - 1 to 2 GB would be OK
    Free Space on Start-up hard disk - VERY IMPORTANT
    • 25Gb my minimum for iDVD
    • 10Gb my minimum for iMovie
    • 5Gb and iMovie runs slow and instable
    • <1Gb and iMovie might not run OK at all
    Other applications running in paralell - results in bad performances
    • Energy Saver
    • Do not spinn down hard disks
    • Use of USB/USB2 external hard disks = Slow and bad performances especially when getting full
    FireWire or internal e-Sata performs best.
    • Screen savers - may be (by directing it to an empty folder - I got the feeling of slight increase
    in performances)
    My list on howto speed up iDVD Slightly - might also applie on iMovie.
    *Speed up iDVD*
    To speed up iDVD
    TO GET IT TO WORK SLIGHTLY FASTER
    • Minimum of 25Gb free space on Start-Up hard disk - if less than 5Gb slow and unstable - less than 1Gb might even not start.
    • Choise of encoding method will give very different productions speeds. On my d-G5 2GHz
    *Professional Quality (movies + menus up to 120 min.)* - BEST
    Takes about 2 x times the other ones - but if quality is of essence
    (Quality might be as good as or even better for movies under 60 minutes - by using Best Performances BUT not for movies up to 120 minutes)
    2 hour movie + menu = about 4 hours to encode at it’s best on my system
    *Best Performances (movies + menus less than 60 min.)* - High quality on final DVD
    1 hour including menu = about 1 hour to encode
    *High Quality* (in iDVD08 or 09) / Best Quality (in iDVD6) *(movies + menus up to 120 min.)* - slightly lower quality than above
    2 hours including menu = about 2 hour to encode
    • Use an as simple DVD-menu possibly without any animation at all. This reduces processing speed dramatically. I use ”Old Theme - and Brushed Metal” and animation turned off.
    • An as fast Mac and as many cores/CPUs possibly. My PowerMac G5 has two CPUs and iDVD uses about 120% = use more than only one CPU/Core. How many it can address I don’t know (anyone ? )
    • If possibly - Use two internally e-Sata drives - Drive access takes a great deal of time
    else FW-800 or FW-400 or USB2 or network storage (slowest and near to useless)
    to work on one (internal, boot, Mac OS, Start-up hard disk - will be BAD - and slow
    Normally my d-G5 2GHz takes about 2 x movie material when iDVD and Mac OS on one internal HD and material is on the other internal one.
    Now with material on an external USB2-drive and an external Lacie FW-400 as Start-up drive material of about 1.5h will need about 4-6 hours to get encoded and burned to DVD.
    Choise and use of hard disks is essential.
    • I guess that a Solid State Disks might improve speed
    • No other programs running in BackGround eg EnergySaver, Internet, AirPort, Bluetooth etc.
    • Don’t let HD spinn down or be turned off (in EnergySave)
    • Move hard disks that are not to be used to Trash - To be disconnected/turned off
    • Goto Spotlight and set the rest of them under Integrity (not to be scanned)
    • Set screensaver to a folder without any photo - then make an active corner (up right for me) and set
    pointer to this - turns on screen saver - to show that it has nothing to show
    • If Mac with only place for one internal hard disk. Then I would try to use an external FW (Mac OS Extended) one as Start-Up hard disk and store material on the internal one.
    eg iMac or ProBook or alike.
    from Karsten -
    • I assume that resolution and codec of source is another factor ... scaling (e.g. 1280x720 to 720x576 = that is an 'un-even' calculation). or, a difference in speed reg. to h264, dv-stream or aic as input ....
    Yours Bengt W

  • MobileDeviceHelper running @ 100% on one CPU Core

    Hi, anyone suggest anything to fix one of my CPU cores runs MobileDeviceHelper (32Bit) at 100% consistently after iTunes is started.
    The machine is a new build with Windows 8 64bit all updates and patches applied. All latest manufacturer chipset and other relevant drivers and every other part of the machine works perfectly. If I end the process, distnoted (32 bit) then replaces it and takes over with another core running at 100%. Ending that process and mobiledevicehelper comes back at one core 100% usage, then ending that and it behaves.
    I have tried restarting the machine, installing updates, disabling the task in task manager, resetting the network adapter (winsock reset) and disabling ApplePush, and itunes helper at startup but am out of ideas now! I haven't even sync'd my phone to it yet.
    Im fast thinking iTunes seems to be getting more buggy each release (I haven't been able to burn an audio cd on the new machine as it crashes while attempting to, but other software can burn the same playlist and file after dragging out of the iTunes playlist) yet iTunes on my Macbook runs fine!

    oh and its iTunes 12.1.1.4 64Bit with Windows 8.1 Pro 64Bit all latest updates.
    As a workaround I have found the two files, renamed them so iTunes cant call them and everything still works fine which begs the questions what are they doing that uses 100% of one CPU core! I haven't setup my iPhone as a remote, or my AppleTVs yet, hoping they don't rely on these services!

  • Using both CPU cores on Zynq?

    Hi,
    Has anyone tried to use both cpu cores of zynq?
    I did not find any example from Xilinx, only related information
    in "Zynq-7000 EPP Technical Reference Manual UG585 (v1.2)".
    It says that cpu0 must do these two things:
    1. Write the address of the application for CPU1 to 0xFFFFFFF0.
    2. Execute the SEV instruction to cause CPU1 to wake up and
    jump to the application.
    Found a "dual cpu demo" example on ARM web-site:
    http://www.arm.com/files/pdf/ZC702_DS5_2.pdf
    However, the attached source code doesn't do any of the
    above two actions. How can the second cpu start then?
    Regards,
    Pramod Ranade
     

    Thank you j, for the suggestions.
    I was basically trying with baremetal/baremetal.
    First I used "hello world" example for CPU0, it
    works fine. Then I added another "hello world",
    but now for CPU1. Then I edited it's main() and
    removed the initialization part and also the
    printf("hello world"). Instead, I simply declare
    a pointer to some memory location. And in an
    infinite loop, I keep incrementing the value
    pointed by that pointer.
    The "hello world0" on the other hand has been
    modified to write start address of the "hello world1"
    to location 0xFFFFFFF0 and then a simple "SEV".
    Then the program reads the same memory
    location (which is being incremented by CPU1)
    and prints it's value to UART. I was expecting that
    the value will be seen increasing...but I see it
    constant.
    For the shared memory location, I tried 0x00700000
    which is in DDR RAM. I also tried 0xFFFFE000 which
    is in OCM. Neither worked...
    I suspect, CPU0 needs to something more than just
    writing CPU1 start address to 0xFFFFFFF0 and then
    issuing a SEV. But I could not find any more information.
    Nor can I find any example that uses both CPU cores.
    Regards,
    Pramod Ranade
     

  • Dual G5 only using one processor in Logic 8

    So...
    Why does my Dual G5 only use one of the two processors in Logic 8? The one processor will go to max, stop the song from a cpu overload, yet the second processor never kicks in.
    Please help! U_U
    Thanks,
    bp

    it seems that the buffer settings on audio preferences are too small.
    use this setting:
    I/O Buffer Size: 512
    Process Buffer Range: Large
    Or... you are using some heavy third party Virtual Instrument that don't support Altivec on PPC processors.
    (many software houses make good plugins that works fine on Intel processors but they forget to use Altivec implementation for PPC Mac side)
    G

  • HT201342 How can I add an e-mail address to my existing icloud addresses?  I currently only use one and I would like to ad two more?

    How can I add an e-mail address to my existing icloud account?  I curently only use one of the three.

    Each iCloud account only has a single iCloud account.  If you want, you can add up to 3 alias addresses that will receive email in the same iCloud inbox, as explained here: http://support.apple.com/kb/PH2622.

  • I have two users with different music on each itunes and i can only use one library, how do i use both for one iTouch?

    i have two users with different music on each itunes and i can only use one library, how do i use both for one iTouch?

    Chris, I believe this link may have the information you're looking for. Welcome to discussions!
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=300432

  • How do I remove an authorized computer from my itunes account? I am only using one.

    How do I remove an authorized computer from my itunes account? I am only using one.

    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH12303
    Barry

  • Can I install CC on three computers - I only use one of them at a time?

    I'd like to use CC on three computers in three cities where I travel - I only use one computer at a time - is this possible with a single license? If so, how?

    As long as you sign out of at least one of them you can.  Sign out before you depart from a given city and you should be set to sign in at another.

Maybe you are looking for