My queue not in SMQ2

HI,
I am creating one new queue with this weblog
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/28/setting-up-inbound-qrfc-queues-for-serializing-idocs-using-the-idoc-adapter
I created new table entry in IDXQUEUE table. But in SMQ2 my that queue is not displaying.why?
regards,
Ansar.

hi,
did you post any IDOCs via it?
you can find config info for this IDXQUEUE in my book:
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/10/11/xi-new-book-mastering-idoc-business-scenarios-with-sap-xi"><b>Mastering IDoc Business Scenarios with SAP XI</b></a>
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

Similar Messages

Queues, not processed automatically they are status Ready

Hi Experts ,
Queues in outbound(smq2), not processed automatically they are status Ready from long time, RFC is working fine
i tried to process maually one by one ,but they are many.
how can i execute this , need your inputs.
thanks in advance
vamsi

Check that the scheduler is running in SMQR
Read,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/Helpdata/EN/e4/df5f3c8dde1c67e10000000a114084/content.htm
Regards
Juan

Error"XI Error CLIENT_RECEIVE_FAILED.INTERNAL: Queue sto" in SMQ2

Hi,
When i am trying to test my JDBC to ABAP Server proxy i am getting the error(XI Error CLIENT_RECEIVE_FAILED.INTERNAL: Queue sto) in SMQ2 please advice me what could be the problem?
Regards,
Bhoj

Hello better you apply LUW on each and every message in SMQ, queues. Else activate and inactivate the messages in the queue by sxmb_adm -> managequeues -> deregisterqueues -> registerqueues -> activate queue.
And also do if any messages are failed follow the blog to resend the failed messages,
XI : How to Re-Process failed XI Messages Automatically

AWT-Event queue not responding

Hi all! I have already posted a message with similar problem wich was solved but this now is a different one.
I have following situation:
I have a class that is called from somewhere (I don't know where from) and that displays a JFrame. After it calls setVisible(true) it calls function synchronized lock() which does wait(). After the JFrame is done it calls synchronized unlock() which does notifyAll().
The purpose is that my JFrame should do some checking and then let the code that called it resume it's work normaly.
Te problem is that this only works with JDK version 1.3. If I do it on 1.4 the frame doesn't respond to clicks and doesn't repaint. If I remove lock() and unlock() the frame works ok but the main program is not suspended.
I suppose that the frame needs to make new threads for user clicks or repainting (I have noticed a Timer thread) but it can't do it for some reason.
Any help?

Yeah, as the doctor said to the patient who said "Doctor, it hurts when I do this" .. "So don't do that" ... don't do that. That is, it sounds as if your application is posting huge numbers of events? So if your application didn't post so many events, would the event queue not be filled up?
- David

Trex queue return error: code 6002, QS error: queue not found

Hi all,
in TREX Administrator tool, in the queue area I see "index01". When I try to perform some operation I receive the error QS error: queue not found. I check services status and I see that queueserver isn't running. I stop the TREX server, delete all file in lock folder, and restart. After few seconds the queueserver crash and stop it.
Please, can you help me?
Fabio Sambugaro.

Hello Duncan,
Thanks for the reply.
Can I do the same from
System Administration > System Configuration > Knowledge Management > Index Administration
We have around 7400 documents to be indexed. The indexing seems to be very slow. Is there any reason for slow indexing?
Kind Regards,
jelbin

Per Session / per User shaping and queuing not working on 7206/7204 on 15.2

Hello,
we are running the following scenario - to provide QoS (shaping/queueing) for our broadband (pppoe) users, we have configured several service-policies on our 7206/7204 BRAS-Routers. The service-policies are applied with RADIUS-Attributes when the pppoe-users dials in. The service-policies look like this
policy-map POL-BM-DEF-P_4m-DSCP-OUT
description << Parent Policy 4 mbps >>
class class-default
shape average 3900000
bandwidth 3900
   service-policy POL-BM-DEF-C_4m-DSCP-OUT
policy-map POL-BM-DEF-C_4m-DSCP-OUT
description << Child Policy 4 mbps >>
class CM-VO-DEF-DSCP
priority 900
police cir 900000
   conform-action transmit
   exceed-action drop
class CM-VS-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 100
class CM-ID-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 900
class CM-MS-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 600
class CM-MC-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 300
class CM-NC-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 150
class CM-NM-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 150
class class-default
bandwidth 800
We are applying the policies with the following Cisco-AV-Pair attribute
lcp:interface-config=service-policy output POL-BM-DEF-P_4m-DSCP-OUT
Until recently that did work pretty good when using software 12.2(33)SRC3. But it turned out that there is a bug in this software that causes that the policy is applied but not working correct sometimes. See bug CSCsv27825. Although that bug does not match the software we are using, the symptoms do. Basically the parent shaper is not working, so there is no backpressure, no need for qos to kick in ;-)
The recommendation was to upgrade to Version 15.2(4)M5. When downloading the image there was a recommendation on the website to use Version 15.2(4)M6 instead, because of some important bugfixes. So we installed that, system cmes back online, everything works - except the service-policies. they are not applied at all any more.
After doing some tests it turns out that
- Policies that shape are not applied. It does not matter if using the ip:sub-qos-policy-out=xxx or lcp:interface-config=service-policy output xxx attribute.
- Policies that police like the one here are applied
policy-map POL-POLICE-DEF-P_1M-DSCP-OUT
class class-default
police 1000000
We prefer the shaping way, because of the smoother handling of bursty traffic.
Any ideas/recommendations ? I've tbeen readign a litte bit on the internet - that problem is not new, but unfortunately no one has a solution :-(
Best regards
Carsten
Short update: as soon as some queuing configuration is present in the policy (parent and/or child) it is not applied. i tried to be extra clever and combine the "policer" parent policy with our child-policy which does priority queuing - not applied. Even the parent-policy alone with no child policy (just the shaper) is not gettign applied.
Any ideas what to debug to get a reason why it is not working ?

Please Ignore Spelling errors. "I asked" replaced "It asked".
Please Reply as soon as Possible !

Queues not automatically processed in SMQ2

Hi
We are on XI 3.0 SP13 and we have this performance issue - on our system -
Even though all of our qrfc queues are registered , we find that our inbound queues get stuck in a 'READY' status and need to be manually activated - every now and then -
Have anyone out there experienced this problem - and can suggested what we are missing here ??
Thanx in advance for your time.

If high volumes of messages are coming, then I think, this problem will occur very frequently.
Try with scheduling the Report RSQIWKEX/RSQOWKEX and try it .
Else , if you can change the design, i.e send less no. of messages at a time and then in XI , using BPM collect it and then send to DB.
Refer this guide-
https://websmp106.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000592892005E.PDF
Also for Queue-
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/11/29/xi-how-to-re-process-failed-xi-messages-automatically
Regards,
Moorthy

SXMB_MONI message fail causing Queue struck at SMQ2

Hi All,
If mapping error occured in SXMB_MONI, corresponding entry will be struck up in SMQ2 and saying that SYSFAIL.
When i drill down this into further, it is saying that Mapping error.
Because of this all messages coming later also getting strucked in this queue.
Why is this happening and what to do for not to get struck further messages
Regards

Hi Hetal,
>>Create a job which will restart message after some time if it is stuck because of connection problem or something, then queue will be clear.
It's because of Mapping problem, even though we schedule a job to restart, it won't resolve. again it comes into same error.
@Prateej:
>>Could you check the QoS for the following entry in SXMB_MONI? Is it EOIO ?
QOS is Exactly Once
@Madu:
>>This is the standard behavior of PI. When some message will fail in Integration Engine(either because of Receiver not found or mapping error),some of remaining message(not all messages) which will come in the same queue of failed message will stuck.
You can not predict which messages will stuck and which messages will not stuck.
YES, you are right.
>>If you are having some important interface, which you want to divert the messages in other queue. You apply exactly once in order in sender channel for other interfaces so that these messages will not stuck in SMQ2.
For me all are Important Interfaces only. I can't prioritize
I think the better solution is Monitor failed messages in MONI every day and if it is failed because of Mapping error means, we can delete that entry from SMQ2.because for mapping related errors we don't require that message to restart again.
so that nothing will be queued after wards.
Regards

Queue Probelm in SMQ2

Folks,
I have deleted the queues as I was not able to restart, Now the inbound side of XI is not receiving anything, Please tell me what is the issue .
Manish

Hi manish,
If there is no entry in the SMQ2, then it is good, so that message will be processing. ANd there is no message is in Queue.
But in your case, there may be some other problem.
Can you check this SAP link-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/b0/df5f3c8dde1c67e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/96/8412417301ee6fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
/people/prasadbabu.nemalikanti3/blog/2006/02/13/configuration-of-a-central-integration-server
Hope this may give some hints.
Regards,
Moorthy

In Bound queue status in SMQ2

Hi All,
i've created a customer in CRM and saved it.
i've filled all the mandatory fields and it should replicate to ECC.
i've checked in SMW01, BUPA_MAIN BDoc is in intermediate state ,then i went to SMQ2 in CRM to check the queue status it is in READY status then upon unlocking the queue and refreshing it moved to RUNNING status and cleared from the inbound queue.....then upon refreshing the SMW01 ,BDoc BUPA_MAIN moved from intermediate state to send to receiver status and customer replicated to ECC.
My query is whenever i create any CUSTOMER/LEAD the queue in SMQ2 should go to RUNNING status and get processed automatically, every time i'm clearing the queue in SMQ2 and refreshing the SMW01 to reliacate the customer to ECC.
Please suggest me if any configuration change i've to do for the automatic queue clearence.
i've cleared all the queues in SMQ2 , there are no queues in wait/failed Status.
Thanks,
Syam

Hi Rohit Sharma,
Thanks for the help it solved my query.
I have one more query ,
Now the customer replicated to ECC without manual clearence of the queue.
even though the customer replicated to ECC i have the BDoc state of the BUPA_MAIN BDoc type as 'Sent to receivers (not all have confirmed)' with yellow light.
BDoc state should change to 'Confirmed (fully processed)' upon successful replication to ECC like BUS_TRANS_MSG for Lead.
Please suggest on any configuration change has to be done for the above query.
Thanks
Syam

Queues deleted from smq2

Hi
I have mistakenly deleted some important queues from SMQ2, now i want to retrive those quesues. could you please provide me the solution..
Thanks
SK

Hi SK,
I have mistakenly deleted some important queues from SMQ2, now i want to retrive those quesues.
that's no problem provided that we are dealing with ExactlyOnce queues. When deleting the SMQ2 queue you do not delete the message, but it's registration for asynchronous execution.
I suppose you already have identified the messages. Simply select them in SXMB_MONI and press the 'Restart' button. This way a new queue entry is generated and pipeline processing of these messages will continue.
Please note: This procedure also applies to ExactlyOnceInOrder (EOIO) queues, however, by deleting the queues the system has lost all information on the order. Consequently the Integration Server can not re-create the initial order of messages. It is up to you to restart EOIO messages in correct order.
Best regards,
Harald Keimer
XI Development Support
SAP AG, Walldorf

** How to stop a particular queue completely in SMQ2 tcodes

Hi,
I have nearly 6000 messages in various queues in SMQ2 tcode (Inbound queues). For example,
XBTO1_0001    1875
XBTO1_0002    2335
XBTO1_0002    1770
Messages are processed slowly. When we tried to stop a queue, only one message is stopped in the queue. Instead we want to stop complete 1 queue. Then, we feel that remaining queues will work fase. So, how to do this ...?
Kind Regards,
Jeg P.

Hi,
1) Why the queue XBTZ is not displayed in SMQR tcode ? (But, it is* displayed in SMQ2)
--->are you sure that the queue XBTZ* is active. Because in SMQr you could see the queues which are active and are already registered.
Re register the queues and make it active.
Try to make the ragistration of queue "XBTZ*" in SMQR.
Press directly Registration tab and rgister the queue then deactivate it.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/59/d9fa40ee14f26fe10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Go to SMQR and check the Scheduler Status i.e first line of the Screen. If it is Wait or any other status, then make sure that all Queues are registered.
Also.
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/11/29/xi-how-to-re-process-failed-xi-messages-automatically
2) If we 'Deregister' the queue, any effect will come for the new messages ?
If we Deregister the queue then the queue is no longer processed.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/29/595f3ca0dd9770e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
thanks
Swarup

DUMMY_BW (0FI_GL_04) delta queue not getting cleared

Hi,
We're using minute based extraction approach for 0FI_GL_04 and thereby have two delta queues for the 0FI_GL_4 extractor in the SAP ERP ECC system: One for the ‘DUMMY_BW’ and the other for the 'real' BI system. The delta queue for DUMMY_BW is not getting cleared automatically in production system and it keeps on adding more records in the queue which is in turn consuming memory in ARFCSDATA. Any thoughts on this would be really helpful.
Regards,
Karthik

Hi Gurus,
Please help me on how can I check that on what fields 0FI_GL_20 is pulling delta.
I tried to find the MSG Type to check in BD52 for relevant field list, in ROOSGEN table. the entry for MSG type is blank there.
Any help on this is appreciated.
Thanks,
Sourabh Deo

Messages in queue not being delivered

Hi
I am using IMS 5.2. After a recent migration of user accounts to an new login ID, some user's emails are not being delivered to thier accounts and are accumulating in the ims-ms queue. When I did the migration, I copied the user's email to thier new account. I did reconstruct -f -r a couple of times, and emails appeared to be delivered to the new login accounts.
There were a few emails left in the queue but now there are close to 6000 and users are not getting emails delivered. When I look at the message in the queue, they state the user is overquota. I checked the user's account and they are not overquota.
Any suggestions on how to correct the problem or get the message to be delivered?
Thanks
Randy

Jay,
iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)
libimta.so 5.2 (built 15:07:23, Feb 21 2002)
SunOS cpmail 5.8 Generic_108528-27 sun4u sparc
SUNW,Ultra-60
This is the original release. There have been over thirty patch/hotfix releases, and hundreds of fixes. I URGE you to go to Sun's download site, and get 5.2p2, and install it immediately.Thanks for the advice Jay. The product is installed as part of the portal we are using(which I upgraded last June). I was unaware of the versioning and patches that are associated with the version of IMS that was installed. I will move forward with confirming with our portal vendor that the latest sp and patches will support the integrated IMS.
>>
>>
How did you "migrate" your users to new login id?When you "copied" the files, did you re-set
ownership/permisions of the files?
I used the following process in a script to migrate
the users from old login to new login:
1. created the new login mailbox with mboxutil -c
2. moved new mailbox to different partitions
There is a utility/command that does all of this for you.
mboxutil -r
When you "moved" the mailbox, I assume you use unix cp, right? Bad Idea.
current versions of mboxutil do this all for you, and don't need reconstruct afterwards.
I suspect that you have either not properly "moved" your user in LDAP, folder database, or have gotten file ownership or permissions wrong after the move.
Unix files are owned by a user and group, and have various read/write permissions set by the OS. YOu're on a Unix system, so you should know about such.I tried using the mboxutil -r initially but was getting a lot of errors with it in my test environment. In hindsight, I am thinking this had to do with the version of IMS I have installed. The unix file move was done with the IMS admin so would also own all the the messages etc on the OS side. I have obviously made a mess of things! So again, I will put in a support call to our portal vendor about how to proceed on this. I really appreciate your input into this.
3. retrieved hashed directory information for old and
new mailbox for user
4. copied files from old to new mailbox with cp -R
oldmailbox/* newmailbox/
5. after all users were migrated, I did a reconstruct
-f -r, and a reconstruct -f -m
I am not sure what you mean by re-set
ownership/permissions.
Have you looked at the "default" log for an errormessage?
I found the following errors in the default log:
default.60.1093908097:[31/Aug/2004:04:15:01 -0600]
cpmail stored[28697]: Store Critical: Error checking
mailbox database: Ignoring log file:
/usr/iplanet/ims52/msg-cpmail/store/mboxlist/log.00000
00543: magic number 0, not 40988
default.62.1094084554:[02/Sep/2004:04:15:02 -0600]
cpmail stored[20883]: Store Critical: Error checking
mailbox database: Ignoring log file:
/usr/iplanet/ims52/msg-cpmail/store/mboxlist/log.00000
00543: magic number 0, not 40988
Your reconstruct command may have been wrong, too. That's what the errors are telling you.
Also, there are other problems in your system. Permission problems, most likely.
I would do a reconstruct -m, first. and see if the above goes away.I will proceed with what you suggested, and let you know the results. Again, thank you very much for your time and input for this.
>>
>>
AS well, when I do a mboxutil -u on an affected user,
the quota information says the user is well under
quota. For example:
$ mboxutil -u xxxxxxxxx
diskquota size(K) %use msgquota msgs %use user
25600 2604 10% no quota 19
19 xxxxxxxxxxx
The error message doesn't really have anything todo with quota.>>
>>
In imta/queue/ims-ms, the user has 183 messages
waiting to be delivered. All of the messages say the
user is over quota.
Any suggestions?
Randy, you need to re-think how you're moving users. You have somewhat messed up your mailstore. . . I will in re-think things. In fact, I have a number of users to migrate. I will stop what I am doing and get this right before I proceed! There is no sense compounding the problem when there is a better alternative. One thing for sure, I will continue using this forum before I proceed with messing with a production system!
You may need to contact tech support for the immediate help you will need to straighten this all out.>>
>>
RandyThanks Jay.
Randy

MQ adapter response queue not found.

On OC4j server start up only the request quese is looked up.
--------------The MDBs (ejb-jar.xml)----------------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans 2.0//EN" "http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd">
<ejb-jar id="ejb-jar_ID">
<display-name>FCRJChannelsNH</display-name>
<enterprise-beans>
<message-driven id="MessageDriven_1093512188974">
<ejb-name>FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB</ejb-name>
<ejb-class>com.iflex.fcr.nh.FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB</ejb-class>
<transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
<message-driven-destination>
<destination-type>javax.jms.Queue</destination-type>
</message-driven-destination>
<activation-config>
<activation-config-property>
<activation-config-property-name>
DestinationType
</activation-config-property-name>
<activation-config-property-value>
javax.jms.Queue
</activation-config-property-value>
</activation-config-property>
<activation-config-property>
<activation-config-property-name>
DestinationName
</activation-config-property-name>
<activation-config-property-value>
java:comp/resource/MQSeries/AtmChannelRequestQ1
</activation-config-property-value>
</activation-config-property>
<activation-config-property>
<activation-config-property-name>
ConnectionFactoryJndiName
</activation-config-property-name>
<activation-config-property-value>
java:comp/resource/MQSeries/LibyaQCF
</activation-config-property-value>
</activation-config-property>
</activation-config>
<env-entry>
<description>
Name of this application.
</description>
<env-entry-name>applicationName</env-entry-name>
<env-entry-type>java.lang.String</env-entry-type>
<env-entry-value>CHANNELS</env-entry-value>
</env-entry>
<ejb-ref>
<description>
This is a reference to the transaction handler bean
</description>
<ejb-ref-name>ejb/TransactionHandlerBean</ejb-ref-name>
<ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
<home>com.iflex.fcr.th.FCRJTransactionHandlerSessionHome</home>
<remote>com.iflex.fcr.th.FCRJTransactionHandlerSessionRemote</remote>
</ejb-ref>
</message-driven>
</enterprise-beans>
</ejb-jar>
--------------orion-ejb-jar.xml looks like this --------------
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<orion-ejb-jar xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://xmlns.oracle.com/oracleas/schema/orion-ejb-jar-10_0.xsd" deployment-version="10.1.3.0.0" deployment-time="10919c03f8d" schema-major-version="10" schema-minor-version="0" >
<enterprise-beans>
<message-driven-deployment name="FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB" wrapper-class="MessageListener_MessageEndpoint11" resource-adapter="MQChannelConnector">
<ejb-ref-mapping name="ejb/TransactionHandlerBean" />
<config-property>
<config-property-name>DestinationType</config-property-name>
<config-property-value>javax.jms.Queue</config-property-value>
</config-property>
<config-property>
<config-property-name>DestinationName</config-property-name>
<config-property-value>java:comp/resource/MQSeries/AtmChannelRequestQ1</config-property-value>
</config-property>
<config-property>
<config-property-name>ConnectionFactoryJndiName</config-property-name>
<config-property-value>java:comp/resource/MQSeries/LibyaQCF</config-property-value>
</config-property>
</message-driven-deployment>
</enterprise-beans>
<assembly-descriptor>
<default-method-access>
<security-role-mapping name="<default-ejb-caller-role>" impliesAll="true" />
</default-method-access>
</assembly-descriptor>
</orion-ejb-jar>
The server's console looks as below
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSResourceAdapter ctor
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSResourceAdapter::start() ENTER
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSResourceAdapter::start(), lookupMethod: resourceProvider, resourceProviderName: MQSeries
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSResourceAdapter::start() EXIT
CommonMangedCFImpl(Queue)::ctor
CommonMangedCFImpl(Queue)::setResourceAdapter
CommonMangedCFImpl(Queue)::setJndiLocation, loc: LibyaQCF
CommonMangedCFImpl(Queue)::createConnectionFactory() enter
08/05/14 20:21:44 AdminObjectImpl (Queue)::setJndiName: AtmChannelRequestQ1
08/05/14 20:21:44 AdminObjectImpl (Queue)::setResourceProviderName: MQSeries
08/05/14 20:21:44 AdminObjectImpl (Queue)::setJndiName: AtmChannelResponseQ1
08/05/14 20:21:44 AdminObjectImpl (Queue)::setResourceProviderName: MQSeries
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSActivationSpec::ctor
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSActivationSpec::setDestinationType, type: javax.jms.Queue
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSActivationSpec::setDestination, dest: java:comp/resource/MQSeries/AtmChannelRequestQ1
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSActivationSpec::setConnetionFactoryJndiName, loc: java:comp/resource/MQSeries/LibyaQCF
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSActivationSpec::setResourceAdapter
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSActivationSpec::validate
08/05/14 20:21:44 JMSResourceAdapter::endpointActivation() ENTER
08/05/14 20:21:44 EndpointConsumer::ctor
08/05/14 20:21:44 WorkConsumer::ctor
08/05/14 20:21:44 WorkConsumer(): Looking up: java:comp/resource/MQSeries/LibyaQCF
08/05/14 20:21:44 WorkConsumer(): Looked up: java:comp/resource/MQSeries/LibyaQCF
08/05/14 20:21:44 WorkConsumer(): Looking up: java:comp/resource/MQSeries/AtmChannelRequestQ1
08/05/14 20:21:44 WorkConsumer(): Looked up: java:comp/resource/MQSeries/AtmChannelRequestQ1
08/05/14 20:21:44 WorkConsumer::creating JMS conn/sess/rec
08/05/14 20:21:45 EndpointConsumer::Started worker
08/05/14 20:21:45 JMSResourceAdapter::endpointActivation() EXIT
08/05/14 20:21:45 WorkConsumer::run method ENTER
08/05/14 20:21:45 WorkConsumer::run(): created endpoint
08/05/14 20:21:45 WorkConsumer::run(): beforeDelivery done
Ready message received from Oc4jNotifier.
Embedded OC4J startup time: 20625 ms.
08/05/14 20:21:49 Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.3.0) initialized
08/05/14 20:21:56 On message...............................
08/05/14 20:21:58 java.lang.NullPointerException
08/05/14 20:21:58      at com.iflex.fcr.nh.FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB.onMessage(FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB.java:602)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.joinpoint.EJBJoinPointImpl.invoke(EJBJoinPointImpl.java:35)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.SetContextActionInterceptor.invoke(SetContextActionInterceptor.java:44)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at com.evermind.server.ejb.InvocationContextPool.invoke(InvocationContextPool.java:55)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at oracle.j2ee.connector.messageinflow.MessageEndpointImpl.OC4J_invokeMethod(MessageEndpointImpl.java:297)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB_EndPointProxy_205g09l.onMessage(Unknown Source)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at oracle.j2ee.ra.jms.generic.WorkConsumer.run(WorkConsumer.java:122)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at oracle.j2ee.connector.work.WorkWrapper.runTargetWork(WorkWrapper.java:242)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at oracle.j2ee.connector.work.WorkWrapper.doWork(WorkWrapper.java:215)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at oracle.j2ee.connector.work.WorkWrapper.run(WorkWrapper.java:190)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:819)
08/05/14 20:21:58      at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
08/05/14 20:21:58 WorkConsumer::run(): return from onMessage()
08/05/14 20:21:58 WorkConsumer::run(): calling afterDelivery on:FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB_EndPointProxy_205g09l@12bed82
08/05/14 20:21:58 WorkConsumer::run(): afterDelivery done
08/05/14 20:21:58 WorkConsumer::run(): beforeDelivery done
08/05/14 20:26:59 WorkConsumer::run(): calling afterDelivery on:FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB_EndPointProxy_205g09l@12bed82
08/05/14 20:26:59 WorkConsumer::run(): afterDelivery done
08/05/14 20:26:59 WorkConsumer::run(): beforeDelivery done
08/05/14 20:32:00 WorkConsumer::run(): calling afterDelivery on:FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB_EndPointProxy_205g09l@12bed82
08/05/14 20:32:00 WorkConsumer::run(): afterDelivery done
08/05/14 20:32:00 WorkConsumer::run(): beforeDelivery done
08/05/14 20:37:00 WorkConsumer::run(): calling afterDelivery on:FCRJNetworkHandlerMDB_EndPointProxy_205g09l@12bed82
08/05/14 20:37:00 WorkConsumer::run(): afterDelivery done
08/05/14 20:37:00 WorkConsumer::run(): beforeDelivery done

Hi todd,
Thanks for the reply and following is my aim.
1) My client is a simple 'C' client which will place a messge in IBM MQ (in my case the queue name is IN.QUEUE) using the MQ client libraries.
2) I expect the Tuxedo MQ adapter should pick up the message from the MQ(i.e. IN.QUEUE) and calls the Tuxedo service (TOUPPPER)
a) As part of the MQ message i have filled the MQMD.ReplytoQ as OUT.QUEUE i.e. i am expecting the response of my tuxedo message in OUT.QUEUE
b) Also i have configured the MQMD.Format as "MYUPPER", meaning as per my TM_MQI.CFG configuration it should call the TOUPPER tuxedo message
3) What i expect is the response of the TOUPPER message should be put in my ReplyToQueue .i.e OUT.QUEUE.
4) My simple 'C' client will read the MQ message from OUT.QUEUE.
5) Everything works fine, expect the response message is not put in OUT.QUEUE.
Regards,
Kiruba.

My queue not in SMQ2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for