My Threads Takes 90 secs to Complete or Timeout

Occasionally works in a few seconds, but 80% of the time very, very slow or it times out. When it works, it is for a few days, then it goes back to the slow/fail mode.
Browser IE 11.
Am I doing anything wrong?
Thanks.
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
SELECT Video Tutorials 4 Hours
New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

no way to filter down to say one month.
I don't have any Alerts any more but I imagine that they have an RSS feed? You could have more control over them that way.
Press a link which would take me to my last page of alerts (currently this is not an options) then using say checkboxes mark them, press a button to unsubscribe.
I thought that is what they do have--paged lists which you can only operate on one page at a time. In that case there may be an implicit &page= variable in the URL you could try exploiting. The most glaring deficiency in the UX about Alerts
is that you can't toggle them from a message list, e.g. the My Threads list, where you can see the icon but do nothing with until you open the thread.
At one point there was a bug in here which made the Alert me checkbox persist no matter how hard I tried to keep it off. I'm turning it on again now so I can see how it really works but I certainly hope it isn't as much work to undo as I remember.
Robert Aldwinckle
Edit: no RSS feed for Alerts at least not with the URL that I constructed from the one for My Threads. E.g. just overtype threads in that URL with alerts. Result: an apparent redirect to the normal Alerts page, ignoring all the parameters
but leaving them in the Address bar.

Similar Messages

Runbook takes long time to complete

Hi,
I created a customized flow to get the data from MS SQL. The runbook is working fine but it takes long time to complete. Is there any option to increase speed or something like that..?
Regards,
Soundarajan.

If you look on the Log tab you can see which activity that took the longest. What does you runbook looks like? If you have for example a Run .NET script activity you can do some tuning on the runbook server. But I think a good start is to share a
figure of your runbook.
Anders Bengtsson | Microsoft PFE | blog at http://www.contoso.se

Concurrent report takes long time to complete

Dear all,
Concurrent report "Inactive items report" takes long time to complete.
How to solve this performance issue ?
Kindly offer me solution to this.
Regards,
Arun

Please post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
Was the performance acceptable before? If yes, any changes been done recently?
Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
Please enable trace and generate the TKPROF to determine why the request takes that long to complete.
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Slow+AND+Concurrent&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=Slow+AND+Concurrent+AND+TKPROF&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Thanks,
Hussein

Query takes 14 hours to complete - kindly help

I'm using Oracle9207 32bit on windows server 2003.
I executed the following query and it takes 14 hours to complete. I don't understand why it takes too long, the database is in archivelog mode and it is not running any other queries. I even specified nologging and the parallel option. And before performing the operation I even "alter table move..." the incmsg table.
The incmsg table contains around 70Million rows.
create table "ECI"."outactions_temp" tablespace USERS nologging parallel as select * FROM "ECI"."outactions" WHERE "ECI"."outactions"."incmsgserno" IN (select "ECI"."incmsg"."serno" from "ECI"."incmsg" where "ECI"."incmsg"."applicationserno" = 2 and "ECI"."incmsg"."timestamp" between to_date('01-MAY-2007', 'DD Mon YYYY') and to_date('21-SEP-2007', 'DD Mon YYYY'));
The execution plan is as follows:
SQL> select plan_table_output from table(dbms_xplan.display('PLAN_TABLE',null,'ALL'));
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | CREATE TABLE STATEMENT | | 993 | 2050K| 8322 | | | |
| 1 | LOAD AS SELECT | | | | | 30,01 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | outactions | 1 | 2080 | 3 | 30,01 | PCWC | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 993 | 2050K| 8322 | 30,01 | PCWP | |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| incmsg | 993 | 34755 | 5343 | 30,00 | S->P | RND-ROBIN |
| 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_INCMSG_TSTAMP | 178K| | 334 | | | |
| 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX104_1 | 1 | | 2 | 30,01 | PCWP | |
PX Slave SQL Information (identified by operation id):
1 - CREATE TABLE "ECI".:Q630001 TABLESPACE "USERS" NOLOGGING AS SELECT C0,C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C7 FROM (SELECT
/*+ ORDERED NO_EXPAND USE_NL(A2) INDEX(A2 "IX104_1") */ A2."serno" C0,A2."source" C1,A2."incmsgserno"
C2,A2."strategyserno" C3,A2."testrunserno" C4,A2."timestamp" C5,A2."xml_actions" C6,A2."status" C7 FROM :Q630000
A1,"ECI"."outactions" A2 WHERE A2."incmsgserno"=A1.C1)
23 rows selected.

I executed the query without the create table statement and the following is the explain plan. I'm still reading thru FAQ on how to format the explain plan.
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost
| TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 993 | 2050K| 832
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
2 | | | |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | outactions | 1 | 2080 |
3 | 33,01 | PCWC | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 993 | 2050K| 832
2 | 33,01 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| incmsg | 993 | 34755 | 534
3 | 33,00 | S->P | RND-ROBIN |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_INCMSG_TSTAMP | 178K| | 33
4 | | | |
| 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX104_1 | 1 | |
2 | 33,01 | PCWP | |
PX Slave SQL Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
2 - SELECT /*+ ORDERED NO_EXPAND USE_NL(A2) INDEX(A2 "IX104_1") */
A1.C0,A1.C1,A1.C2,A2.ROWID,A2."serno",A2."source",A2."incmsgserno"
,A2."strategyserno",A2."testrunserno",A2."time
stamp",A2."xml_actions",A2."status" FROM :Q633000 A1,"ECI"."outact
ions" A2 WHERE A2."incmsgserno"=A1.C1
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Note: cpu costing is off, PLAN_TABLE' is old version
21 rows selected.
SQL> spool off;

Thread Process is exiting without completing the process in SharePoint 2010 webpart

We have implemented simple thread to process to excel upload into SharePoint 2010 custom list.
Thread process running in local SharePoint 2010 environment (OS -Windows 7). Once we deployed in SharePoint server,
Thread process is exiting without completing its proces.
Please let us know if you know any resolution.
Code is as below
Thread thread = new Thread(new ThreadStart(UploadData)); //Upload is the method where data will insert into List
Thread.Start();
Marulasiddappa SB (Swamy)

Hi,
According to your post, an error occurred when you used Thread in SharePoint 2010 web part.
Please can do as follows:
1. Execute the UploadData method to see whether it can work.
2. Debug your solution in Visual Studio to get more information the error,
It will be easier for us to research if you can provide more code.
Best Regards
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support

After reinstalling Photoshop CS6 Bridge is very slow. It takes 15 sec to respond to a mouse click. Photoshop is OK.

I had to reinstall Photoshop CS6 after rebuilding my PC. Now Bridge takes 15 sec to respond to a mouse click. Photoshop is fine. I have installed all updates.
Any thoughts?

Slow as compared to what? Have you seen better performance with older versions of Photoshop?
>after app launched, it takes nearly 5 seconds to be able to browse through menus
Takes my system longer than that to start Photoshop CS5, and while my computer isn't a top-of-the-line workstation today (it was a few years ago), it's no slouch. Photoshop has never been a fast application to start up.
-Noel

With vodafone usb modem broadband, it takes mozilla 5 mins. to access a website;Mozilla 1.7 takes 30 secs.

I have vodafone broadband mobile lite (USB modem) and after selecting a website, it takes up to 5 mins. to get there and open it. (and by the way, IE is the same), whereas old old Mozilla 1.7, which is what I am submitting this through, takes 30 secs, or so via vodafone.
Kerry Joyner

http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable/localization#legacy36

There were pictures originally on my computer and were somehow take from my computer completely and moved to my iphone. On my iphone it doesn't let me delete those photos and i have no idea how to move them back to my computer. HELP? I need to keep them.

There were pictures originally on my computer and were somehow take from my computer completely and moved to my iphone. On my iphone it doesn't let me delete those photos and i have no idea how to move them back to my computer. HELP? I need to keep them, they are valuable to me and were supposed to have been on my computer. I have no idea how to move them back since my computer barely lets me open my iphone and acknoledge those moved photos. Please help me!!

Also in itunes on my computer i deselected the photos and their still on my phone.

MacBook Pro HD delay in opening files it takes 10 sec to access the HD Macintosh ?

MacBook Pro HD delay in opening files it takes 10 sec to access the HD Macintosh ?
When I click on HD I can't see files immediately ? It takes about 10 sec then files show up "on standby mode that is not happen!?"

Hello Bulko,
It may be that there is an issue with your hard drive. Running Disk Utility's Verify Disk (and Repair Disk as necessary) can help resolve many such issues.
Using Disk Utility to verify or repair disks
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1782
Cheers,
Allen

HT1918 How do i put NONE for payment now that i already selected a card i want to take my credit card completely?!?

How do i put NONE for payment now that i already selected a card i want to take my credit card completely?!?

How to update my credit card information

Accurately Calculating the time a Thread takes to run

How do I accurately gain timings for a thread? I have a number of threads which are calling CalculatorEngine which locks on an object starts a timer (ctime = System.currentTimeMillis();) and then logs the time just before the thread exits
System.out.println("Calculations for " + setName + " for " + calcsMadeByCalcEnginge + " positions took: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - ctime));
But if there is a context swich my timer will continue to run until the thread is reactivated and then completes... How can I gain the actual timings for how long the thread took?

How do I accurately gain timings for a thread? You can't.
>
But if there is a context swich my timer will
continue to run until the thread is reactivated and
then completes... Correct.
How can I gain the actual timings
for how long the thread took?You can't. As I said and as you already pointed out why.
Not to mention that on modern OSes threads in other apps might steal time as well.
You can just run it in a loop, make sure no other resource hungry apps are running and then estimate the time taken.

Jdbc driver creates new thread for each statement with a query timeout set

I am profiling a web application that is using the Microsoft JDBC driver, version 1.1 to connect to a sql server 2005 database. Each java.sql.Statement that is created, within the application, gets a query timeout value set on it ( statement.setQueryTimeout(...) ).
I have discovered that the JDBC driver creates a new thread to monitor each Statement and the query timeout value. When the application is under load these threads are getting created faster then they are being destroyed and I am concerned that this will cause a performance problem in production.
One option I have is to remove the query timeout value and the monitor threads will not be created, another is to change JDBC drivers.
I'm curious is there any way to control this behavior so that these threads are not created or are managed more efficiently. Is there a workaround that anyone is aware of? Is this considered a bug?
I have found a similar bug here for the 2000 driver:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/894552
Cheers

Hi,
Thank you for using the Microsoft SQL Server JDBC driver. You are correct that a new thread is started to monitor the query timeout when a statement is executed. This is a potential performance issue that we may look at addressing in the upcoming v1.2 release. The current behavior is not configurable. The only workaround with the v1.1 driver is to limit your use of query timeouts to only those statements which you reasonably might expect to actually time out.
We do take customer feedback very seriously, so if anyone else is concerned about this particular issue, please chime in and we will be able to give it appropriate weight.
--David Olix [MSFT]

Deployment operation was not completed within timeout

I use Eclipse 3.3 and WLS 10. If i deploy my EAR to the server after 5min i get the following error in plugin "com.bea.workshop.wls.core":
"Deployment operation was not completed within timeout. State Type : running; Command Type : distribute; Action Type : execute; Completed : false; Failed : false; Message : null; Exception : null"
The timeout ist just in the eclipse-plugin , the deplyoment on the server runs to end but the application ist not activated.
Anyone has solved this problem?
Thanks
Diego

The timeout happens every time when i deploy the ear the first time to the server and the stubs are generated and compiled.
it is funny that last info before timeout-error 'publishing finished' comes while wls is in full action compiling the myprojEjbEntity-module.
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.091
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.091
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myproj]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.091
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbAllgemein]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.106
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbEntity]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.106
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbBackoffice]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.106
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbCes]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.106
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbDisposition]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.106
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbFormulare]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.106
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbLogistik]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.106
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbPerformancetest]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.106
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbStammdaten]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.106
!MESSAGE Module not added:[myprojEar-TEST,myprojEjbRm]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:17.200
!MESSAGE Getting available modules on Weblogic server.
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:18.140
!MESSAGE Deployment manager created @13032027
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:18.218
!MESSAGE Releasing deployment manager @13032027
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:18.218
!MESSAGE Total deleted modules: 0
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:18.281
!MESSAGE Publishing beginning.
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:18.328
!MESSAGE Module Status:
-myprojEar-TEST (add) (deploy)
--myproj (add)
---myprojEjbAllgemein (add)
----myprojEjbEntity (add)
-----myprojEjbBackoffice (add)
------myprojEjbCes (add)
-------myprojEjbDisposition (add)
--------myprojEjbFormulare (add)
---------myprojEjbLogistik (add)
----------myprojEjbPerformancetest (add)
-----------myprojEjbStammdaten (add)
------------myprojEjbRm (add)
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:19.282
!MESSAGE Deployment manager created @10400586
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:19.314
!MESSAGE ***dm.getAvailableModules (initModuleNameCache)
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:19.345
!MESSAGE Deploying library module wls-commonslogging-bridge#[email protected]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:19.345
!MESSAGE ***dm.distribute (deployLibrary) wls-commonslogging-bridge#[email protected]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:20.128
!MESSAGE Waiting on ProgressObject:@4026405
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:20.738
!MESSAGE ProgressObject completed :@4026405
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:20.738
!MESSAGE ***dm.start (deployLibrary) wls-commonslogging-bridge#[email protected]
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:20.770
!MESSAGE Waiting on ProgressObject:@14021095
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:20.895
!MESSAGE ProgressObject completed :@14021095
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:20.895
!MESSAGE Library module wls-commonslogging-bridge#[email protected] was deployed sucessfully.
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:20.895
!MESSAGE ***dm.distribute (deploy) myprojEar-TEST
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:36:20.989
!MESSAGE Waiting on ProgressObject:@26461882
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:41:21.003
!MESSAGE ProgressObject completed :@26461882
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:41:21.035
!MESSAGE ***dm.getAvailableModules (initModuleNameCache)
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 2 3000 2007-08-14 07:41:21.097
!MESSAGE Module myprojEar-TEST was not found on the server. Unable to perform undeploy.
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:41:21.113
!MESSAGE Releasing deployment manager @10400586
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 1 2000 2007-08-14 07:41:21.160
!MESSAGE Publishing finished.
!ENTRY com.bea.workshop.wls.core 4 0 2007-08-14 07:41:21.238
!MESSAGE Module named 'myprojEar-TEST' failed to deploy.
!SUBENTRY 1 com.bea.workshop.wls.core 4 4000 2007-08-14 07:41:21.238
!MESSAGE Deployment operation was not completed within timeout. State Type : running; Command Type : distribute; Action Type : execute; Completed : false; Failed : false; Message : null; Exception : null

Calling a Oracle Stored Procedure which will take a while to complete

Hey.
I'm calling a Oracle stored procedure which goes of and do a whole lot of things and therefore takes a fair while to complete.
Currently I am doing this:
String sql = "begin concorde.start_transfer(); end;";
HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory().openStatelessSession().connection().prepareCall(sql).execute();
....Where HibernateUtil is just a mean to get to the SessionFactory. The connection I get is the same one as a JDBC, I think.
I would want to regain control of the application as soon as the procedure is called and continue with the rest of the logic.
How do I do that? Do I have to initiate it from a different thread?
Thanks

If it was me I wouldn't have a stored proc that took a while to complete. Instead I would submit a job to job queue. In terms of implementation I would call a proc that writes a record to a table. Then a process in the database polls that table and runs jobs it finds there. Then reports results somewhere.
Sometime later you collect the results.
But without that then the solution in java is obvious - create a thread.

Bind variable code takes more time to complete?

Hello, My database is oracle11g.
I have same plsql code and first one is without bind variable and second one is with bind variable. Usually, bind variable should take less time. But here
the bind variable takes more time than the regular code... Can any one please explain why?
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select * from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 SELECT count(*) into v_cnt
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = i.benefit_id)
12 AND effective_date =
13 TO_DATE ('2011-01-23 00:00:00', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH24:MI:SS')
14 AND rate_type_id = 1;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....06
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL>
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select benefit_id from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 execute immediate 'SELECT count(*)
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = :x)
12 AND effective_date = trunc(sysdate)-202
13 AND rate_type_id = 1'
14 into v_cnt using i.benefit_id;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....061
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>

Shrinika wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.. Now i understand...
One final question on this thread before i close this thread....
My database is set to CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE for some reason. It seems somebody applied a "quick and dirty fix" to "database is slow" problem. BAD PRACTICE
My question is, when we use bind variable, does it parse the sql code every time? or does it reuse the execution plan?
In my database, it reuse the execution plan... Just checking... When we set CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE, it should generate the execution plan
for every unqiue sql code... Is that correct? Am i confusing?If by "parse" you mean a "hard parse" (which generates execution plan), then the answer is NO. As you observed, it reuses execution plan.
For e.g. with CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE setting, following SQLs
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 10 ;and
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 20 ;would tend to reuse the same execution plan since both of these will be rewritten by oracle (before execution) as
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = :SYS01 ;Hope this helps.
Edited by: user503699 on Aug 14, 2010 3:55 AM

My Threads Takes 90 secs to Complete or Timeout

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for