N95 and services, eg Flickr

I am very frustrated with this phone, and the lousy documentation. It says I can use the service to upload images to Flickr. My username and password are apparently not authenticated - but when I log on from the webbrowser and upload images that way, it works fine. So clearly the upload and my flickr account work.
However, that takes about 4 more steps than the supposed easy service that is supposed to come with the phone. Any ideas what the problem is?

Similar Messages

No updates for N95 and more

Well it seems to be that there's not going to be more firmware updates for N95. That's a big shame for Nokia because at least I was expecting ASR. I got an iPod Touch and I've seen that even the old iPhone 2G is receiving updates to the next firmware 2. But if you want Nokia's ASR and newest services, you have to buy a new Nokia like the new N96 or N85 they're launching. I've paid so much for my N95 not so long ago and now it's a forgotten cellphone.
That's why I'm planning to sell my N95 and buy the new iPhone 3G, I know it will not be unlocked, I'll have to unlock it by my self, and I know that it's 2MP camera will not be the same than the N95 camera; but I'm happy because I know that I will always have updates for this device, will have ASR and other things that Nokia could update on their devices instead of making them obsolete.
Come on Nokia, when are you going to learn?

hi mate simple threats of going to the iphone will not help them bring out software for your phone , i doubt any software peeps from noia even read this forum its a users forum if you have a problem you should email nokia directly through their contact us pages
if i was a nokia technician though id have to stop myself from laughing at you for going over to the iphone i mean that would be a major step backwards and youll only be lining o2 and apples allready bulging pockets some more and have a rubbish phone with outdated features for the next 18 months , i mean cmon how long has 3g been out for and apple act as though its new lol anyways i dont want to start the n95 vs apple debate again any power user will know that the n95 is still top of the pile
there will be 1 more new firmware for the n95-1 , and iam sure it will contain asr and geotagging for the 5mp camera just like the n82s last update did and n95 8gbs added it too, yes thats right the n95 8gb did not come with asr as standard from release it was added in v20 if iam correct v15 for the 8gb dosent have it so it was pretty dam good for them to add it
anyways v21 on the n95 is very good just add rotate me or landscape pro and your phone will have asr, the nokia technicians dont really have to sort out any issues at all with v21 , it has transformed my phone into a top hanset with decent battery life for such a feature packed handset , new firmwares roll out mainly to iron out bugs if a handset dosent have bugs why would they update it??
we are lucky that nokia can even be bothered to add new features really , they dont have to do they , the handset isnt advertised with asr is it , nope , so we are lucky they listen and add features
i seriously cant believe youd leave the n95 for the iphone but hey everyone to thier own
i personally think nokia do well with their updates and nokia users are lucky that their phones get updated via the net and that nokia can be bothered to add new features etc into the firmware and not just iron out little bugs
anyways mate id be more patient before you go over to the darkside i believe the new firmware for the n95-1 will be avalible just before the n96 release as the developers are going to be busy with their new hanset and ironing out the new bugs on that n96 , once the n95-1 has asr and geotagging bult into firmware it will be more then the device we was promised and i think nokia will leave it like that for a bit and work on the n96

N95 and Toyota Bluetooth hands-free system

On 11th March I purchased a used (55 plate) Toyota Corolla Verso and as part of the deal had the Toyota Bluetooth hands-free system installed.
Everything worked fine with my Sony K600i which has eventually given up the ghost and required replacement.
I opted for the Nokia N95 and after a short wait due to stock availability it was delivered to my home address on Friday 4th May.
My initial "very impressed" thoughts soon changed to disappointment when I tried to pair the N95 with the Toyota hands-free system...
Unlike the Sony, the phone does not automatically detect that the Toyota system is searching for it.. but I can bypass this by manually searching for other devices with the phone whilst the Toyota system is searching.
I'm then asked to input the pass code (default 1234) on the phone... which I do... and the Toyota system announces that the pairing has been successfull... connection in progress... however the phone then flashes a message stating that it is not possible to pair with the Toyota system at which point the Toyota system declares "connection failed".
I've tried numerous times now with Remote Sim on and off, deleting all paired devices and starting from scratch etc etc...
I've been and spoken to the Toyota Dealership and of course they claim that there's nothing wrong with the car kit - it worked with the phone I had when I bought the car and it's not their fault I've changed to a phone which is incompatible.
As far as I can tell, the N95 has Bluetooth 2.0 installed (so did the Sony) and I understand that this *is* backwardly compatible and as such should meet the technical requirements of the Toyota System... however the lady on the service desk at the Toyota Dealership stated that there could be other issues too, but was either not able or not willing to specify what those issues would be. She suggested that the only way they would possibly be able to do anything about it would be only if Customer Relations gave them authorisation to do so and gave me their telephone number (01737 363633).
Having spoken to Toyota Customer Relations, they simply infer that it's my fault for purchasing a phone that is not compatible - but even they declined to provide me with documentary evidence (which they claim to have) proving that it is not compatible. Instead they suggested that the only course of action I would possibly have would be to speak with the dealership.... who have of course already told me that they are not able to do anything without the say so of Toyota Customer Relations.
I get the feeling someone isn't quite telling the truth...
I figure that the only way I'm going to have any recourse with Toyota is to prove beyond doubt that the phone is compatible with the requirements of the Toyota system... according to the Toyota Bluetooth hands-free system owners manual I merely need to ensure that any desired phone supports Bluetooth hands-free profiel 0.96 or 1.0.
I've tried asking O2 - they didn't know the answer and suggested I should call Nokia.
I've called Nokia on the following numbers:
08450 545454
08700 555777
09067 547540 (premium rate £0.75 per minute)
08706 092832
08450 045555
Each without success... note that the 08706 092832 number was answered by an extremely unhelpful, arrogant lady... you can probably sense I'm beginning to get a little irate now...
I've also tried to call Nokia on 08450 045555 given to me both by the Nokia website and the arrogant lady I refer to above...
At the time of writing this post, I've had the phone to my ear ringing away for 1 hour 16 minutes and counting....
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.... (Me catching my breath so as to stay calm)
Can anybody whatsoever with the slightest element of confidence tell me whether the Nokia N95 supports Bluetooth hands-free profile 0.96 or 1.0??
Any advice, assistance, stress and frustration relief would VERY much appreciated.
Regards
D.Burns-Keane

Hello again... I thought some of you may like to know that I have made some progress.
After a rediculously long time on hold with Nokia I eventually opted to hang up and call back... frustratingly I did of course get through straight away only to be told that it was actually one of their quieter days and that there was no reason (as far as the guy knew) why I should have been on hold for so long... regardless... the guy was extremely helpful.
I explained my issue in detail and he advised that as far as he knew, because the phone has Bluetooth version 2, it could/would/should be compatible.
Separately I had also emailed Club Nokia with the full details of my issue.
I had also logged an appeal with Toyota Customer Services (Head Office).
Initially Toyota's response was that technology moves so fast, specifically the mobile phone industry, that technology such as car kits etc are often left inferior. As polite as they were, they basically washed their hands of the problem putting the blame squarely at my feet for purchasing a phone that in their opinion was incompatible.
My appeals regarding viewing it as unreasonable that having only bought the car in March of this year and one part of it already being relegated to a fancy dashboard accessory that doesn't really do much apart from ignore my requests to pair with my phone, fell on deaf ears to say the least. Even though I had directed them towards this and at least one other online forum upon which other Toyota owners claimed to have had their Bluetooth system upgraded under warranty.
Then an email reply arrived from Club Nokia. It specifically stated, "this handset [Nokia N95] has a bluetooth version of 2.0 and does support the headset profile"
Of course, this prompted an immediate phone call to Toyota Customer Services again... quoting my reference number (for my earlier conversation(s) with them) and informing them of the information/clarification received from Club Nokia their tone shifted a little and I was told that they would call me back.
A couple of days later I received a phone call from Customer Services informing me that they had authorised my local dealer to upgrade the Bluetooth system under warranty.
Approximately two days later I had a phone call from the Dealer informing me that the part(s) had been ordered.
And as I sit here typing this right now, they're fitting the new system to my car.
Granted I think there's a chance both the guy I spoke to at Nokia and the emailed response from Club Nokia miss the point slightly as they appear to be relying on the fact that the phone has Bluetooth V2.0 and therefore *is* compatible... this may not necessarily be the case - somebody suggested in an earlier post that the phone is only compatible with handsfree profile 1.5...
However, if Nokia are telling me it's compatible I figured I'd quote that to Toyota and see what happened (afterall I'm not telling porkies, I'm simply passing on the info I obtained from the people who *should* know)...
I think this proves a little persistance certainly goes a long way!
(I guess I just need to test the damn thing when I get my car back later today)

Broken publish service for Flickr

Hi,
I tried to publish a set of photos on Flickr when something went wrong in LR 4.1 (on Win 7-64). 3 shots were uploaded successfully when LR suddently claimed that: "Can't upload this collection. Could not connect to the Flickr web service. Please check your internet connection." My Interent connection is fine and I can browse Flickr normally. I can also go into the publish service and re-authenticate my Flickr-account successfully. But the problem persists. I can create a new publish service for Flickr and that one works fine.
So the settings for my first Flickr publish service seems to be broken somehow.
1. Does someone know how to fix the broken publish service?
2. Is there a way to move my shots in the broken publish service to the new one without breaking the link between the shot and the copy on Flickr?
Thanks,
Mike

It's a bug http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom_4_1_rc2_a_cr_or_lf_n_the_m iddle_of_a_caption_causes_failure_to_connect_to_flickr
You can vote to force adobe to resolv it.
Maybe yoy have a cariage return in caption.
Stéphane

Problems with N95 and WiFi via ICS Windows XP Sp2

Hello, I have a Nokia N95 and I'm having trouble browsing the internet on my phone via WIFI. I'm using windows XP sp2. I have a working internet connection via my ethernetcard on my laptop. And I have enabled ICS (internet connections sharing on this interface). Then I also have a wireless network card and I have setup a wireless network. I know this wireless network works as I'm able to browse the internet via another laptop via the wireless network and the ICS. I'm able to connect with my N95 to the wireless network but the web browsing does not work on the N95. I know I'm receiving an IP address for the phone via DHCP of the ICS as I can see the ip and mac address in the arp table of the laptop. I can also ping the ip address of the N95. Anyone any suggestions? Or is the N95 not compatible with ICS?
Thanks in advance.

Upgrade to XP SP3 then check this:
Windows XP SP3 Bug
Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3) introduces a bug in ICS that requires restarting the ICS Windows service after several events, including disconnecting the network cable from the ICS machine.
In Microsoft support article KB951446, the process of restarting the ICS service is explained, but there is no mention of a plan to fix this bug in the future[1].
In later Microsoft support article KB951830, more details and a hotfix (Update for Windows XP (KB951830)) are given.[2][3] This hotfix is not currently being distributed via Windows Update, and so it must be manually installed.
It works. XP SP 2 has the same problem.

Domain Object and Service oriented pattern

We have J2EE based application with following components, we are facing some issues with existing system.
Current System : We have J2EE based application. The following is the flow.
Client Layer [including JSP, Struts ] action classes  Delegates  Session fa�ade [Session bean]  DAO EJBDAO  EJB. We use CMP, xDoclets , JBOSS.
1.     Our Domain objects are heavy. I know they are suppose to be coarse objects but they take more time in loading. Also, we noticed one thing that lot of methods are called during Domain Object creation process and it takes lot of time in loading. Actually, we dont really know what is happening as we are using CMPs.
Question :
-     Any input on what can be done to avoid Domain object excessive loading time.
-     Anyone can share there experiences with Domain objects. Are you facing issues related with performance.
-     We dont use DTO, we pass domain objects between. Do you see any problem in doing that.
2.     Currently, our system was used by one single front end or lets say we have only one client but soon we will have more clients using it.
Question :
-     What should be our design approach. How can we make our system more like service oriented. If the two clients demand different business logic then how it will be handled. Business logic common to all the clients will be handled by which layer and business logic specific to client will be handles by which layer.
-     Please suggest based on our existing infrastructure. We don�t want to use SOAP or cannot make drastic changes to our flow.
We have domain and services in the same package and we are doing the refactoring of code, your inputs will be valuable.
Thanks
Sandipan

What type of logger do you use and what is the loger-level during production?
If it is log4j set the logger to level INFO or WARN.
This might sound trivia but can make a difference between 20seconds and 500 ms.

Creation of Sales Order and Service Contract from Inbound IDOC

Hi Experts,
My requirement is to create a Sales Order as well as a Service Contract from one Inbound IDOC. I am getting the Inbound IDOC from a third Party. The message type is ORDERS and Basic Type is ORDERS02. How ever i am using an extension type IDOC which carries all the required data for Sales Order and Service Contract. My requirement is like, to create a Sales Order first.
I have created a Z FM which is attached to the Process Code and subsequently to the message type. Inside the FM i an calling FM 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS' for creation of Sales Order. After that i am changing the IDOC data for the Document Type. I am changing the document type which is responsible for Contract Creation.
Then I am again calling the FM 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS' for creation of Contract with the help of IDOC data. But here the Contract is not getting created. It's getting failed during the Batch input session.
I need to solve this problem as soon as possible. Please help me. If there are any other options also please share.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Priyabrata

Actually there is problem with BDCDATA. Inside the FM it's calling transaction with help of BDCDATA. If i am creating a Sales order or contract alone its creating successfully. But when i am trying to create both, it's retuning sy-subrc '1001' after calling the transaction on the second attempt. Is there any problem with BDCDATA like we can't handle with less time gap? Please help and give your inputs.
Regards,
Priyabrata

NB205 - very poor product and service, do not buy Toshiba!! Completely dead in 6 months

I am posting this to warn as many people as possible to avoid buying Toshiba in the future. Not only was the product faulty, which I can understand sometimes happens w mass production. But the service was completely unacceptable, which was the deciding factor for me.
1. My new Netbook NB-205/BL started intermittently shutting down for no reason (complete black screen, not even to blue screen). By the time I returned home from my trip it had stopped working altogether. The power light will come on, and the fan/hard disk will try to spin for a split second and then go silent and stop completely.
2. Upon calling tech support who walked me through a bunch of diagnostic attempts (removing and re-inserting battery, etc.), they concluded it was dead and I needed to send it in.
3. The only thing I really care about is my data as I had stored a bunch of invaluable photos and downloaded about $200 worth of Amazon MP3s since receiving the Toshiba NB205.
4. Tech support assured me they would back up the hard drive for me and ship either a fixed or new computer with all my data still intact. They asked me to register it w their warranty department and call them back so they could send me a shipping box to send it back in. I did all that and it's been >3 weeks and no box.
5. So today I called Tech Support again and the guy goes "Oh yes, you have shipped your computer in for a hard drive failure?". At which point I had to explain how A) it's not a hard drive failure B) I haven't shipped anything anywhere because I never got the box I was promised.
6. Then I proceed to ask him again if my data would be safe, to which he informs me it's Toshiba policy/practice not to back up data for customers. I found this to be unacceptable and then I didn't know who to trust so I asked for a supervisor.
7. This supervisor wasn't able to help me either as he further informed me that they will not back anything up for me AND that I had to pay for shipping AND pay an authorized Toshiba Repair Center to back my hard drive up.
8. I suggested what everyone who I've talked to has said: Toshiba could send me a new computer since they've diagnosed the old one as being dead. I could swap out the hard drives, or they could send me one without a hard drive. And I could send them back the dead NB205.
9. NO was the answer. Toshiba wouldn't do anything for me, because software issues are NOT under warranty. And backing up my hard drive is considered to be a software issue. I repeatedly told him that it's their defective hardware that is causing the need for data backup. But this went ignored and I was told they don't cover anything in this case.
I either had to lose my data or pay probably $100 for a Toshiba dealer to back up my data for me. Oh yeah, and there isn't one of those within 20 miles of me and I live in Silicon Valley!! Oh yes, and they want me to pay to ship them the dead computer.
10. I finally asked him how he would feel if he was the customer, and if he felt this was any way to treat Toshiba customers. He replied by saying they have a process, and this is the process!
Well the next time I and any of you are in our "process" of deciding which brand of technology to buy, I'm certainly not going to consider Toshiba anymore. This is the second chance I'm giving Toshiba after having a very poor laptop AND service experience in 2000. Well, it took me 9 years to give them another shot, and I'm never going to trust them again. I told myself "well, it's a high quality Japanese brand, one that commands a premium in price that people are willing to pay so it should be an excellent product. AND if things do go pooryly, Toshiba will stand behind their name."
I was SO wrong!!! Let this be a message to all people out there, as I did read these forums before buying my product, but the NB205 was so new it didn't have many posts.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me! I'm done with you Toshiba, it's really too bad that you will not honor your brand with fair treatment of your customers.
Ming Wu

It isn't that difficult to back up the data from the hard drive. You can easily do it yourself for about $20. http://www.datarecoverytutorial.com/recover-data-from-failed-laptop-notebook/
As for Toshiba backing up your data, ALL of the manufacturer's have that same policy. NONE of them will backup the data for you nor will they guarantee that your system will be returned with the existing data intact. This is spelled out in the Warranty documents and is fairly common knowledge amongst most computer users.
If the data was that important you should have been backing it up to USB flash drives, a usb external hard drive, or some other backup device on a daily basis just for this very reason. The fact that you failed to do so doesn't make it Toshiba's problem.
If you don't post your COMPLETE model number it's very difficult to assist you. Please try to post in complete sentences with punctuation, capitals, and correct spelling. Toshiba does NOT provide any direct support in these forums. All support is User to User in their spare time.

Need Single Billing Document for Materials and Services in Sales Order

Hello Friends,
I am selling FERT items and DIEN items in the Sales Order.
Document flow as follows:
Finished goods - Order-Delivery-Billing
Services - Order-Billing
In this process 2 seperate billing documents are created
i. Delivery Related Billing document for Finished goods.
ii. Order related Billing document for services.
I want to create a single billing document for both the items (FG & Services) in the sales order.
Please suggest.
Thnx.

Sorry for the delay friends.
Somebody suggested me to make services 'relevant for delivery' to ensure single billing document.
What I did were the following steps:
1. Copy Item Category TAD to ZTAD and make is 'relevant foir delivery'
2. Assign Item Category ZTAD to Sales Order type and Item Cat Group 'LEIS'
3. Go to Deliveries Item Categories and through new Entries add ZTAD. Make ZTAD relevant for Picking.
4. Go to copy control 'Order to Delivery' and insert ZTAD in Item Categories relevant for this combination.
Now when I create sales order with materials and services, they pass over to the delivery document and in the Services item, storage location/plant is greyed out. Only the picking quantity is required to be filled.
PROBLEM :
I am not getting the price of Services item in the billing document.
Billing document copies all line items (tangible and intangible) from Delivery Document
It takes the services item details/quantities etc. to VF01 but the price comes '00.00'
Any suggestions.
Is this legally viable? Someone told me its not legally correct.
Thanks.
Mohammed

Tables for materials and services in SRM

Hello,
In what tables can I find the information of materials and services of the COMMPR01 transaction, especially the Orderunit-field?
This field is not stored in the COMM_PRODUCT table.
Thanks,
Aart

Thanks Jagadish,
I looked at the tables but I can not figure out how I can get from the product GUID (product from COMM_PROD) to the correct Orderunit of the material in the COMM_PR_PUR_1 which has the ID of an order set?
Thanks,
Aart

Idoc for materials and service for same contract.

Dear All
I have an scope where i have to migrate the data for material and services for the same contract.Is there an Idoc which does it so or otherwise ?Earlier in scope materials contracts have been loaded with the help of idoc type :- PURCONTRACT_CREATE01 and that of Service Contract using Idoc type :- BLAORD03.No customization is however permitted .Tcode for the same is ME32K.
Regards
Somnath

Hi,
It is not clear to me if you are working with sapscript or smartforms.
You have only to find a variable which identifies the kind of invoice
I do not know that variable so i use an example variable
for sapscript:
/: IF &VBDKR-FKTYP& = '1'
/ INVOICE
/: ELSE
/ SERVICE ORDER
/: ENDIF.
In a smartform you can also do something like that.
but There you work with conditions (eq, BOOLEAN)
You have only to find the right variable
success,
Gr., Frank

Material and Service in a Single Line Req

Hi
We hv a requirement of material and service in a single line item, Exampls is client ordering some fabrication work to one vendor. It involves both matl and service changre.
For the matl cost we need to calculate VAT and for the service charge we need to calculate service tax.
For ex 1000 is the total amt for a line item. In this 600 to be calaulated for VAT 4% and for balance 400 to be calculated as serv tax 12.5%.
The same is happening in sales and they can be do this. How tro do the same in MM purchasing.
Vijay

Hi
Can it be possible to make a PO only one line item. Say item 10 thats only one item. That line 10 have both matl and service.
Both matl tax and service tax need to be calculated for the line item 10.
Is this possible.
Client dont req these as 2 line items. Here the scenarion and req is like that.
Vijay

I have an HP-Pavilion Vista PC with MS Office 2007 and Service Pack 2. Each time I try to save a Wo

I have an HP-Pavilion Vista PC with MS Office 2007 and Service Pack 2. Each time I try to save a Word or Excel document I get the “Not Responding” message. The “Word is saving……” bar at the bottom does not show any progress. On clicking the document I get a faded version even when in Safe Mode. Somehow the document appears on the Desktop where I tried to save it. On trying to open the saved document, even as administrator, I get the following ”File in Use” message:
“The ….docx is locked for editing by….” and I am asked three questions including:
“Do you want to open a Read Only copy” yet on clicking “Yes” I am able to edit the same document.
On trying to save to a different location I get the message:
“Your autocorrect file MSO 1033.ad could not be saved. The file may be read only or you may not have permission to modify this file.”
The same message stating FILE12\1033\MSO.ACL MSO 1033ad recurs with new Excel documents.
How can I correct this problem?
PS
Worse still, the HP Advisor icon that appears on startup does not load successfully while showing the message: “Access to the path Hewlett-Packard\HD Advisor is denied”.
What can I do about it?
ZDK

I'm having the same issue, allowing guest access on the share did change the logs I'm getting in Samba. Earlier on it was giving errors on the inability of guest access to the share.
============================================================
[2008/01/29 13:05:47, 0] /SourceCache/samba/samba-100.5/samba/source/lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 4204 (3.0.10)
Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection
[2008/01/29 13:05:47, 0] /SourceCache/samba/samba-100.5/samba/source/lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
============================================================
I also noticed that the temporary file that is created by office is not removed after the attempt to safe the file. (something like: ~$filename).

Contract , scheduling agreement and service order

Hi all,
Can anybody tell me about the contract scheduling agreement and when we can suggest our client to go for schedule or contract agreement ?
Pls tell me elaborately .
Also Pls explain me about service order and when can i go for service order . whether it is restricted to AMC ?
Pls explain me elaborately.
pls explain me steps for creating contract or scheduling agreement and service order..........................
points to be rewarded.
Regards,
Girish.

Hi,
Contract is outline purchasing agreement where you have a contract with the vendor,may be a for a predetermined quantity or predefined value. So everytime you need the matl, you need to make PO ref the contract asking for the delivery of the matl. In such instance when PO is ref with contract its called contract release orders or call off orders. So Process are ME01, ME11, ME31K with aggnrement type, ME51,ME21 & MIGO,
Scheduling agreement is a long term purchase agreement, where you will keep issuing the delivery schedules whenever there is a change in requirement or at predetermined time intervals. The delivery schedule can be on hour/daily/weekly/monthly basis. SA is also an agreement with the vendor for the supply of matl, may be a quanity or value. The delivery dates will be maintained in ME38 ref the SA which are called delivery schedules.So you can maintain the delivery schedule and communicate the vendor on Forecase basis or JIT basis. And when you need some more matl then will only create SA deliveries using ME38. SA could be of 2 types:- without release documentation-system will transmit the delivery info to the vendor once you save the document.
With release documentation- after creating the delivery schedules you need to create SA release using ME84.So Process are ME01, ME11, ME31K with aggnrement type, ME38 & MIGO,
Service order or service PO is created with item Category "D" and an account assignment category as per ur requirement. U can not enter ur material here only u have to maintain short text of material. Example: You want to clean the boiler and u given contract to your Vendor. Vendor sends quotation mentioning that Rs.100/hr/Man head. Now how you will measure the cleaning activities of furnace? You can pay to contractor based on the hourly basis/ man head spent in cleaning activities. So in this case create the Purchase Order mentioning "Cleaning" in the short text in Item overview(Acc assignment ' K' or C or P and Item category 'D) and item details " Man Head" Service No , Gross price - Rs.100.00 and unit - hour ( or pick from Service master) and Quantity-number of hours spent by all man head.
The steps to create Service PO are:
1) Maintain Item Category as D & account assignment such as cost center Kor slaes orderC
2) Keep material code field blank.
3) Enter description of service & other fields in the PO Item Overview level. Press Enter.
4) System will prompt you to maintain services at Item Level. Maintain your service master number / service description & other fields (quantity / rate /)
5) Save the PO.
For more follow the links;
For more follow the link;
http://esoadocu.sap.com/socoview(bD1lbiZjPTgwMCZkPW1pbg==)/render.asp?packageid=DBBB6D8AA3B382F191E0000F20F64781&id=EB65A89F1AFD4C46AB61C6161BAF
http://www.sap-img.com/sap-sd/sap-sd-scheduling-agreement-vs-contract.htm
http://www.copacustomhelp.state.pa.us/infopak/nav/procurement/contracting/file1499/index.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/what-is-outline-and-scheduling-agreement.htm
Regards,
Biju K

Issue in generating Invoice with standard and service material

There is one scenario where along with standard material (i.e Tube bending machine) they charge the customer for the Design and Development of a machine (which is a service). Is it possible to make a standard order with the standard material(with excise and cst/vat) and service material (with service tax only) in one single order?
I have tried with both the material in a single order but while making invoice system is taking only the standard material as in item category we have mentioned Billing relevance from delivery document. And service material will not have the delivery.
I would be thankful if you could spare some time and check the exact problem.

Hello,
Yes.. this is a common problem when you use Delivery relevent material and service material in the same order. Why don't you use the service material in differnt order and invoice it? or do you have any restriction like the delivery relevent material and the service material should be billed in one invoice?
Prase

N95 and services, eg Flickr

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for