Name of the constraint

Hi all,
Can anyone suggest me When creating table, which
constraint have index associated, that is
generated automatically by oracl
Thanking you
Seshu

Seshu,
are you doing an exam and just asking all the questions on the forum? All your questions sound very "exam" like".
Grant Ronald
Forms Product Management

Similar Messages

Find the column name for a constraint

Hi Guru,
I know the constraint name, now i need the column name and table name for the constraint?
Thanks

Query the USER_CONS_COLUMNS then you will find the column name and table Name
SQL> Select * from USER_CONS_COLUMNS where Constraint_Name='<Your_constraint_Name>';

Please Help - Avoid default name when creating constraints

Here I am creating two very simple tables:
create table supplier
     id number not null,
     constraint pk_supplier primary key (id)
create table product
id number not null,
supplier_id number not null,
constraint pk_product primary key (id),
constraint fk_product_supplier_id
foreign key (supplier_id) references supplier(id)
After done while I choose to view table constraint information by using:
select table_name, constraint_name
from user_cons_columns
where lower(table_name) = 'product';
I get result:
TABLE_NAME                     CONSTRAINT_NAME
PRODUCT                        SYS_C005441
PRODUCT                        SYS_C005442
PRODUCT                        PK_PRODUCT
PRODUCT                        FK_PRODUCT_SUPPLIER_ID
What is the "SYS_C005441" and "SYS_C005442" for? Can I avoid creating them?
Thanks

Justin Cave wrote:
Are you suggest not explicitly naming all your constraints? Or just the NOT NULL ones?No, not at all. Did not even thought that far when I responded. Bit of foot in mouth as I only thought of not null constraints. Blame it on a lack of coffee. :-)
I usually name primary & foreign key and check constraints. But not null constraints - too much of an effort to name them IMO.
But you do raise an interesting topic. Why bother naming some constraints (e.g. PK and FK) and not others (e.g. not null)? So playing devil's advocate, why should we be naming constraints at all?
It sounds like you're suggesting that all constraints should get system default names. Well, one can argue that the same effort of naming other constraints is not worth it - why have null constraints as the exception to implicit naming? I would think that the issue I raised also applies to all constraints.
You have multiple foreign key constraints for INVOICE_ID - how do you name these? I would like both the table and column names as this will provide the meaning needed when seeing the constraint being violated. But with 30 chars only, that is a problem. So invariable one needs to start to abbreviate table and column names in order to make it meaningful constraint name. Been there many times - disliked the constraint name I came up with every time, as it was a compromise and not the actual naming format I would have preferred.
If that's what you're suggesting, doesn't that create problems for you when different environments have different constraint names? I know personally that I'd much rather have named constraints so that when there are constraint violation errors in production, I can start troubleshooting the problem in my local environment without first determining how to map the production constraint name to my local database's constraint name. Understand your point - and yes, it can be an issue. But by the same token, why should an application user ever see a default Oracle exception? With the exception of system-type exceptions (e.g. no more tablespace space, eof on communcation channel), all other exceptions should be custom application exceptions.
Showing for example a "+ORA-00001: unique constraint (xxx.xxxxx) violated+" is wrong IMO. The app code should trap that exception and raise a meaningful and unique application exception for that. The user seeing anything other than a custom app exception, should itself be an exception.
And I'd much rather be able to put the constraint name in a script that is to be promoted through the environments rather than coming up with a process that uses dynamic SQL to figure out the name of the constraint I want to do something to. Well, I would not rely on a constraint name itself to determine what it is. Just because it says fk_invoiceid_invoices does not mean that is is a foreign key on column invoice_id and references the invoices table. The safe/proper thing to do would be to query the data dictionary and confirm just what that constraint is.
I suppose if you know that all the lower environments are very recent clones of production rather than running all the scripts in source control that these problems may not be particularly large. But I'm curious if you have some better approach to handling them (or if I'm completely misinterpreting what you're suggesting).Not sure if you recall some feature discussion with Tom and others (was on asktom?) when someone came up with this core issue and suggested it be addressed by allowing one to define an exception message with the definition of the constraint. Cannot recall the exact syntax proposed, but I do remember thinking that it was not a shabby idea - as this solves the problem of having to invent a meaningful name using 30 chars only. And it also removes the need for trapping that constraint violation in all app code that may cause the exception and raising a custom and meaningful app exception instead. Not too mention that plain and direct SQL access will show the same exception message.
Perhaps in Oracle 12c? I assume the c as it seems that The Next Big Thing is cloud computing and surely Oracle 12 will somehow try to exploit that buzzword - as it has with i (Internet) and g (Grid) versions. ;-)

How to refer to a column name in the domain constraint

When we specify a check constraint (for SQL Server) within a domain we need to enter some syntax expression, for example
len(phone) > 7
Later the modeller will put exactly this expression into SQL code. But this would be wrong as constraint should refer to a column name in the table (which would not be "phone").
So how to make Data modeler to put a real column name within domain constraint?

Thank you very much, it really works!
However I would like to know where I can get documentation on such internal variables (like %COLUMN%)? I find it difficult to locate this information in the Help file attached to a modeler (it seems that it only describes UI screens).

Getting the constraint name with sql%bulk_exceptions

Hello folks,
Is there any way to get the constraint name that was violated using sql%bulk_exceptions.
I've a parent table and it's two children tables. When I try to delete from parent using forall, save exceptions, I want to know what constraint violated at what iteration of a bulk operation.
I've following script.
set serveroutput on
drop table chld;
drop table chld2;
drop table prnt;
create table prnt(n number primary key);
insert into prnt select level from dual connect by level<11;
create table chld(cn number references prnt(n));
insert into chld select level from dual connect by level<3;
create table chld2(cn number references prnt(n));
insert into chld2 select level*3 from dual connect by level<3;
select * from prnt;
select * from chld;
select * from chld2;
commit;
declare
type t_prnt_obj is table of prnt.n%type index by pls_integer;
t_prnt_tab t_prnt_obj;
l_exp_cnt integer;
begin
select n bulk collect into t_prnt_tab from prnt order by n;
dbms_output.put_line('t_prnt_tab.count -- '||t_prnt_tab.count);
forall i in t_prnt_tab.first .. t_prnt_tab.last save exceptions
    delete prnt where n = t_prnt_tab(i);
exception
when others
then
    l_exp_cnt := sql%bulk_exceptions.count;
    dbms_output.put_line('Total exceptions:'|| l_exp_cnt);
    for k in 1 .. l_exp_cnt
    loop
      dbms_output.put_line('Error '||k|| ' - Collection Index: '||sql%bulk_exceptions(k).error_index||' - Error Code: '|| sql%bulk_exceptions(k).error_code||' - Message: '||SQLERRM(- sql%bulk_exceptions(k).error_code) );
    end loop;
end;I get the output as below:
t_prnt_tab.count -- 10
Total exceptions:4
Error 1 - Collection Index: 1 - Error Code: 2292 - Message: ORA-02292: integrity constraint (.) violated - child record found
Error 2 - Collection Index: 2 - Error Code: 2292 - Message: ORA-02292: integrity constraint (.) violated - child record found
Error 3 - Collection Index: 3 - Error Code: 2292 - Message: ORA-02292: integrity constraint (.) violated - child record found
Error 4 - Collection Index: 6 - Error Code: 2292 - Message: ORA-02292: integrity constraint (.) violated - child record foundInstead, I want to get in output with the constraint_name added. Like below:
t_prnt_tab.count -- 10
Total exceptions:4
Error 1 - Collection Index: 1 - Error Code: 2292 - Message: ORA-02292: integrity constraint (GK.CP_FK) violated - child record found
Error 1 - Collection Index: 1 - Error Code: 2292 - Message: ORA-02292: integrity constraint (GK.CP_FK) violated - child record found
Error 1 - Collection Index: 1 - Error Code: 2292 - Message: ORA-02292: integrity constraint (GK.C2P_FK) violated - child record found
Error 1 - Collection Index: 1 - Error Code: 2292 - Message: ORA-02292: integrity constraint (GK.C2P_FK) violated - child record foundIs it possible, if so how do I get it?
Thanks in advance for you help.
Girish

This is phenomenal, Manik. It surely eased the work am doing at the moment.
Thanks to you and many more to, Tom!
Cheers!
Girish

How to apply the constraint ONLY to new rows

Hi, Gurus:
   I have one question as follows:
   We need to migrate a legacy system to a new production server. I am required to add two columns to every table in order to record who updates the row most recently through triggers, and I should apply not null constraint to the columns . However, since legacy system already has data for every table, and old data does not have value for the 2 new columns. If we apply the constraint, all of existing rows will raise exception. I wonder if there is possibility to apply the constraint ONLY to new rows to come in future.
Thanks.
Sam

   We need to migrate a legacy system to a new production server. I am required to add two columns to every table in order to record who updates the row most recently through triggers, and I should apply not null constraint to the columns .
The best suggestion I can give you is that you make sure management documents the name of the person that came up with that hair-brained requirement so they can be sufficiently punished in the future for the tremendous waste of human and database resources they caused for which they got virtually NOTHING in return.
I have seen many systems over the past 25+years that have added columns such as those: CREATED_DATE, CREATED_BY, MODIFIED_DATE, MODIFIED_BY.
I have yet to see even ONE system where that information is actually useful for any real purpose. Many systems have application/schema users and those users can modify the data. Also, any DBA can modify the data and many of them can connect as the schema owner to do that.
Many tables also get updated by other applications or bulk load processes and those processes use generic connections that can NOT be tied back to any particular system.
The net result is that those columns will be populated by user names that are utterly useless for any auditing purposes.
If a user is allowed to modify a table they are allowed to modify a table. If you want to track that you should implement a proper security strategy using Oracle's AUDIT functionality.
Cluttering up ALL, or even many, of your tables with such columns is a TERRIBLE idea. Worse is adding triggers that server no other purpose but capture useless infomation but, because they are PL/SQL cause performance impacts just aggravates the total impact.
It is certainly appropriate to be concerned about the security and auditability of your important data. But adding columns and triggers such as those proposed is NOT the proper solution to achieve that security.
Before your organization makes such an idiotic decision you should propose that the same steps be taken before adding that functionality that you should take before the addition of ANY MAJOR structural or application changes:
1. document the actual requirement
2. document and justify the business reasons for that requirement
3. perform testing that shows the impact of that requirement on the production system
4. determine the resource cost (people, storage, etc) of implementing that requirement
5. demonstrate how that information will actually be used EFFECTIVELY for some business purpose
As regards items #1 and #2 above the requirement should be stated in terms of the PROBLEM to be solved, not some preconceived notion of the solution that should be used.
Your org should also talk to other orgs or other depts in your same org that have used your proposed solution and find out how useful it has been for them. If you do this research you will likely find that it hasn't met their needs at all.
And in your own org there are likely some applications with tables that already have such columns. Has anyone there EVER used those columns and found them invaluable for identifying and resolving any actual problem?
If you can't use them and their data for some important process why add them to begin with?
IMHO it is a total waste of time and resources to add such columns to ALL of your tables. Any such approach to auditing or security should, at most, be limited to those tables with key data that needs to be protected and only then when you cannot implement the proper 'best practices' auditing.
A migration is difficult enough without adding useless additional requirements like those. You have FAR more important things you can do with the resources you have available:
1. Capture ALL DDL for the existing system into a version control system
2. Train your developers on using the version control system
3. Determining the proper configuration of the new server and system. It is almost a CERTAINTY that settings will get changed and performance will suffer even though you don't think you have changed anything at all.
4. Validating that the data has been migrated successfully. That can involve extensive querying and comparison to make sure data has not been altered during the migration. The process of validating a SINGLE TABLE is more difficult if the table structures are not the same. And they won't be if you add two columns to every table; every single query you do will have to specify the columns by name in order to EXCLUDE your two new columns.
5. Validating the performance of the app on the new system. There WILL BE problems where things don't work like they used to. You need to find those problems and fix them
6. Capturing the proper statistics after the data has been migrated and all of the indexes have been rebuilt.
7. Capturing the new execution plans to use a a baseline for when things go wrong in the future.
If it is worth doing it is worth doing right.

In a new Application, the ApplicationResources_en.properties file is not having the constraint messages created

Hi Everyone:
          We are using JDev 11.1.2 and JHeadstart 11.1.2. We have been having a multitude of problems when running applications through the migrator (and we have now been told by an Oracle consultant that the migrator is problematic), so we are trying to re-write things from scratch to bring them over from 11.1.1.4 to 11.1.2.
          I have been working on a simple application from scratch and discovered that the messages for constraints on the entities that I am using are not showing up in the ApplicationResources_en.properties.file. We noticed a similar thing with converting an application using the migrator and that post is found here - java.lang.NullPointerException ADF_FACES-60097 message ***WITH SOLUTION*** -.
          However, I didn't get a single reply to that thread.
          I initially thought it was a migration issue, but this application is from scratch. Whenever I tried to input an invalid value into a page column, the following exception would be received.
"java.lang.NullPointerException ADF_FACES-60097:For more information, please see the server's error log for an entry beginning with: ADF_FACES-60096:Server Exception during PPR, #"
           This Null Pointer turned out to be the missing message from the ApplicationResources_en.properties file. In the new application I just wrote, I had to manually edit to add the following lines to the ApplicationResources_en.properties file and the application no longer gives me the error if I input an invalid value.
VALIDATE_FEE_CATEGORY_3=Feecategory with this FeeCategory does not exist
VALIDATE_ACADEMIC_TERM36=Academicterm with this EffectiveTermStart does not exist
VALIDATE_ACADEMIC_TERM36_CASDEL=Cannot delete Academicterm while dependent Specialexchange exists
VALIDATE_ACADEMIC_TERM37=Academicterm with this EffectiveTermEnd does not exist
VALIDATE_ACADEMIC_TERM37_CASDEL=Cannot delete Academicterm while dependent Specialexchange exists
VALIDATE_CURRENCY23=Currency with this Currency does not exist
VALIDATE_CURRENCY23_CASDEL=Cannot delete Currency while dependent Specialexchange exists
VALIDATE_FEE_CATEGORY_3=Feecategory with this FeeCategory does not exist
VALIDATE_FEE_CATEGORY_3_CASDEL=Cannot delete Feecategory while dependent Specialexchange exists
These constraints are found in the Entities .xml files as shown below. We are using a re-usable business components .jar file to import them in.
<Key
    Name="UniqueFeeCategory"
    PrimaryKey="true">
    <DesignTime>
      <Attr Name="_DBObjectName" Value="UNIQUE_FEE_CATEGORY"/>
    </DesignTime>
    <AttrArray Name="Attributes">
      <Item
        Value="its.sis.uwbm.AREdit.entityobjects.Specialexchange.FeeCategory"/>
      <Item Value="its.sis.uwbm.AREdit.entityobjects.Specialexchange.Currency"/>
      <Item
        Value="its.sis.uwbm.AREdit.entityobjects.Specialexchange.EffectiveTermEnd"/>
    </AttrArray>
</Key>
<Key
    Name="ValidateAcademicTerm36">
    <DesignTime>
      <Attr Name="_referencedKey" Value="UNIQUE_ACADTERM_CODE"/>
      <Attr Name="_isForeign" Value="true"/>
      <Attr Name="_DBObjectName" Value="VALIDATE_ACADEMIC_TERM36"/>
    </DesignTime>
    <AttrArray Name="Attributes">
      <Item
        Value="its.sis.uwbm.AREdit.entityobjects.Specialexchange.EffectiveTermStart"/>
    </AttrArray>
</Key>
<Key
    Name="ValidateAcademicTerm37">
    <DesignTime>
      <Attr Name="_referencedKey" Value="UNIQUE_ACADTERM_CODE"/>
      <Attr Name="_isForeign" Value="true"/>
      <Attr Name="_DBObjectName" Value="VALIDATE_ACADEMIC_TERM37"/>
    </DesignTime>
    <AttrArray Name="Attributes">
      <Item
        Value="its.sis.uwbm.AREdit.entityobjects.Specialexchange.EffectiveTermEnd"/>
    </AttrArray>
</Key>
<Key
    Name="ValidateCurrency23">
    <DesignTime>
      <Attr Name="_referencedKey" Value="UNIQUE_CURRENCY_CODE"/>
      <Attr Name="_isForeign" Value="true"/>
      <Attr Name="_DBObjectName" Value="VALIDATE_CURRENCY23"/>
    </DesignTime>
    <AttrArray Name="Attributes">
      <Item Value="its.sis.uwbm.AREdit.entityobjects.Specialexchange.Currency"/>
    </AttrArray>
</Key>
<Key
    Name="ValidateFeeCategory3">
    <DesignTime>
      <Attr Name="_referencedKey" Value="UNIQUE_FEECAT_CODE"/>
      <Attr Name="_isForeign" Value="true"/>
      <Attr Name="_DBObjectName" Value="VALIDATE_FEE_CATEGORY_3"/>
    </DesignTime>
    <AttrArray Name="Attributes">
      <Item
        Value="its.sis.uwbm.AREdit.entityobjects.Specialexchange.FeeCategory"/>
    </AttrArray>
    Is this a known bug (I have searched and havent found it) and is there anything that I can do about it without having to manually add the messages?
Mary
UofW

Hi Everyone:
           I have done some further testing. We are using a re-usable Business Components .jar file to access our entities. We import the .jar file into the project and create the ViewObjects and ViewLinks from that .jar file.
            It APPEARS that a test case using the HRSchema and using the Entities & Associates generates the constraint error messages, but when I use the .jar file of re-usable business components imported into the project, those constraint error messages are not created in the ApplicationResources_en.properties file. I have created two testcases as well as the re-usable .jar file that I can send to you to show what I mean.
            This behaviour seems to have shown up in 11.1.2 as there was no problem before this.
             Please let me know where you'd like me to upload the testcases.
             Thank you.
Mary
UofW

Find the relationship between tables where the constraint type is 'R'

Hello,
I am trying to find an answer of the following question:
How to query the user_constraints view (probably some more views should be involved here) in order to get information about the table name, the column (or columns) that is (are) a foreign key to another table, the name of the referenced table, and the name of the referenced column (or columns) and finally the name of the FK. And additionally, if the referenced table from the first row has its own constraints of type 'R', then to have this table in the second row, where this same table stands in the first column. Each table that is a participant in this tree, of course, could have one or many FK to other tables. One does not know this at run time.
A predicate to say with which table to start the search from will look like this:
<pre>
user_constraints.table_name = 'my_table_name'
</pre>
So, if you could help by providing at least hints for such a query, I will be glad to see different answers.
Thanks :)

Thanks a lot for the answer!
That will work and is a very useful starting point.

Problem in the constraints

Hi friends,
I have a scenario in the sense, i'm a Apex Developer.......Im developing an database application in apex by using two tables..........
One table is the one that im taking from my production instance, in my scenario i have taken the table from the HRMS.......The table name is
*) per_all_people_f
Other table is the one that im creating in the customly in apex itself, the table name is
*) xx_l_org_emp_details
Since the Apex and the production instance are of in the different server, so what i did inorder to access my production table to apex means, in the sense i created a db link between the two server and through this db link i have taken the production table in the apex........
so, according to my scenario i need to build the application using these both tables, that is the table from production instance and the table that i creating in the apex.......
According to my scenario, i shouldnot make any DML operations in the production instance table due to the security purpose.....What all i need to do is just fetch the datas from it, inorder to use it in the application.....But i can perform the DML operations in my custom table that i created in the apex(xx_l_org_emp_details).......
So inorder to use the two tables in my application i need to join the two tables,
For that in the table*"per_all_people_f"* person_id, is the primary key column...So what i did is i created a some of the columns in the custom table along with person_id in it inorder to give join between the two.....
Okay by using the two tables i have created the application......This is what the steps so far i have done.........
My problem comes over here......Since the name of the application that i was developing is the salary certificate....
So, a single person can raise more than twice or thrice the salary certificate according to his need........And all these details will be stored in the custom table xx_l_org_emp_details only...
But my problem is a single person cannot raise more than one salary certifcate request, because i have taken"person_id" as a primary key column which is unique constraint and it will not allow duplicate values.....
At that time, what i did is i disabled the unique constraint in the table and i started to insert more than three salary request by a single person........Hence all the three records raised by a single person is inserted in my custom table as i disabled the constraint.....( If the constraint is enabled means i cannot insert more than one that's why i disabled it )....
But incase, if i want to update any three of the request raised by the single person means, i need to update it......But it is not allowing me to update as it is throwing error like
>ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number ...
I know that this error will occur, as it doesnt know which record it needs to take inorder to update that's why it is throwing the above error.......
But according to my scenario i need to update all the three records raised by the single person, and also he can apply more than 3 request by himself...for this case what can i do.......Any idea friends....
Help me to achieve this........
Thanks,
GTA...

Are you using an update for this? Or a merge?
Please post the statement.
An update statement updates both the rows for a given person_id with the same value.
SQL> CREATE TABLE UPDTEST
2 AS
3         SELECT 1 PERSON_ID, LEVEL * 10 SAL
4           FROM DUAL
5     CONNECT BY LEVEL < 3;
Table created.
SQL> SELECT * FROM UPDTEST;
PERSON_ID        SAL
         1         10
         1         20
2 rows selected.
SQL> UPDATE UPDTEST SET SAL=100 WHERE PERSON_ID=1;
2 rows updated.
SQL> SELECT * FROM UPDTEST;
PERSON_ID        SAL
         1        100
         1        100
2 rows selected.
SQL>

When the update statement will check the constraint violation ?

Hello all,
i am working on data masking of production data using oracle Translate function.i have created a function otis_mask using translate function to mask sensitive values .For this i am tesitng on a small table. i have created a table with single primary key column SSN.
sql>desc SSN_MASK
Name Null? Type
SSN NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
1) i have inserted the value 9949577766. if resulted mask value exist in table it should throw the constraint violation error.But it is not throwing any error.rows are properly updating .
Eg:-
Table contains below values.
PA_DATA_SUB @qdsrih30 >select *from SSN_MASK;
SSN
7727399911
9949577766
9989477700
UPDATE SSN_MASK SET SSN=otis_mask(SSN);
if above update statement process 7727399911 first then resulted mask value is 9989477700.This value is already in the table.
if the update statement process 9949577766 first then resulted mask value is 7727399911.This value is already in the table.
in any of the above scenario update statement should have to throw constraint violation error. But its not happening. rows are properly updating . when the update statement checking the constraint violation ? after processing all the rows or processing of each row ?
Please help me in understandding the update statement processing ?
Thanks,
Venkat Vadlamudi.

1)created a function as below.
CREATE OR REPLACE Function otis_mask(incol varchar2) return varchar2 is
random_str varchar2(20);
begin
select (translate(incol,'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ1234567890','qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmQWERTYUIOPASDFGHJKLZXCVBNM0842319576')) INTO random_str FROM DUAL;
return random_str;
end;
2. create a table ssn_mask.
create table ssn_mask(ssn number(10) primary key);
3) inserted 3 rows as below.
insert into ssn_mask values(9949577766);
insert into ssn_mask values(7727399911);
insert into ssn_mask values(9989477700);
4)UPDATE SSN_MASK SET SSN=otis_mask(SSN);
5) Table contains below rows.
Sql >select *from SSN_MASK;
SSN
9949577766
7727399911
9989477700.
6)UPDATE SSN_MASK SET SSN=otis_mask(SSN);
If the above statement process first row 9949577766,then otis_mask function will return 7727399911 and update statement will update the value of 9949577766 to 7727399911 .At this case 7727399911 is already in the table.So update statement should have to throw primary key constraint violation error.
If the above statement process second row 7727399911 first ,then otis_mask function will return 9989477700.and update statement will update the value of 7727399911 to 9989477700.At this case 9989477700 is already in the table.So update statement should have to throw primary key constraint violation error.
But its not throwing any integrity constraint violation error.
i just want to know when update statement will check the constraint ?
is update statement will first process all records and kepp in handy the new values then update the table with new values (or) process the first row and update the new value with old value then process second row and update with new value so on ?
Thanks,
Venkat Vadlamudi.

Problem with compatible with the constraints of search tools

Hy there
I have a lot of problems in making a site in the state of the art, having no web base but print
An example when I go to my site analysis on the net, many problems arise, it tells me:
"Your compatible with the constraints of search tools is quite low which limits certainly influence and effectiveness"
• It speaks to me of keywords, it is then that I have no back, and find myself completely aberrant
• I was asked to give alternative names to images
• robot.txt file
how does one with Muse because I can not find anywhere
Thanks for your help

Hi,
You will find the below links helpful and pretty simple to follow in Muse to make your site search engine friendly.
SEO in Adobe Muse
Strategies for SEO | Adobe Muse CC
Cheers,
Vikas

Not able find the constraint in the Database

When I am trying to udpating a table I am getting error like
ORA-00001: unique constraint (IRP_DXX.SECURITY_UK) violated
ORA-06512: at "IRP_DXX.AU_COMPANY_ABBREVIATION_TR", line 20
ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'IRP_DXX.AU_COMPANY_ABBREVIATION_TR'
When I try to query for the constraint name in the all_cons_columns table, I am not able to find the constraint
select * from all_cons_columns
where constraint_name = 'SECURITY_UK';
no rows selected.
Can anybody help in finding what may be the issue here?

yes this is the name of a Unique constraint on a particular column. Thanks for the pick. Its strange for me.
Hence, we can impose unique constraint on a column without actully creation a unique constraint, but indirectly by create a UNIQUE INDEX on the column.
Is my understand right?

I have 3 iTunes libraries on my one one computer and since I updated to the new version I can no longer see who's library I am in. It used to show at the top of iTunes the name of the library I was in. Is there a way I can tell which library I am in?

I have 3 iTunes libraries on my one one computer and since I updated to the new version I can no longer see who's library I am in. It used to show at the top of iTunes the name of the library I was in. Is there a way I can tell which library I am in without closing and reopening?

No. Frequently the apps take up more storage space on the iPod that the file download size.

File name in msdb.dbo.backupset no longer matches the actual file name on the storage media. Error 3013 Restore Database is terminating abnormally.

Thanks in advance for taking the time to read this and comment. Platform: Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition SP1 (X64) Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (SP1) - 10.50.2500.0 (X64) Jun 17 2011 00:54:03 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1)Problem Description: The file name recorded in the msdb.dbo.backupset (sans the extension) no longer matches the actual file name written to the backup media which is
in this case a NETAPP NAS storage share. Example:
Mohave_backup_2014_03_14_233001_1158878.bak      (from NETAPP NAS filer)
Mohave_backup_2014_03_16_233001_4167237             (from MSDB.dbo.backupset), as you can see, the last 7 digits (chars) of the file name are different, although the date and time are identical. The
file names had previously been matching perfectly. The first occurance of this problem occured on 03/13/2014 at 5:00 AM MST. The error generated by the job was:
Date  3/14/2014 10:29:23 AM
Log  Job History (Refresh - Restore Mohave_93_DEV AD HOC)
Step ID  1
Server  OurDevServer
Job Name  Refresh - Restore Mohave_93_DEV AD HOC
Step Name  Restore Mohave_93_DEV
Duration  00:00:01
Sql Severity  0
Sql Message ID  50000
Operator Emailed
Operator Net sent
Operator Paged
Retries Attempted  0
Message
Executed as user: OurDomain\OurNetworkServiceLogin. Restore Mohave Prod to Mohave_93_DEV - ERROR: 3013 RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally. [SQLSTATE 01000] (Message 50000). The step succeeded.

Olaf:
Thanks for your reply. Sorry, my bad. I inadvertently copied wrong [name] form the msdb.dbo.backupset. On 3/13 and 3/14, the two file names did not match. In trying to select another example to show you this morning, I found that the names are now matching!
What I was doing was to create dynamic t-sql to retrieve the latest prod backup of the database, and then restore it with move to the development server. This is an ad-hoc job that the developers can run by themselves whenever they require a refresh. Unfortunately,
we only keep 3 days worth of backups for these databases, so the original disk file I was trying to use to restore no longer exists. Researching the original error, one of the error descriptions was that the restore could not find the file requested.
I thought this very strange since I get the file name directly from the backupset table. Further research did indeed show that the file names were different, but unfortunately, I failed to save the details of the file names. Anyway, in looking for a new example
to show you this morning, I have found that the file names are indeed matching exactly again. If this error pops up again, I will be sure to save all details and re-post.
Thanks, regards and best wishes to you and yours,

What is the exact name of the cable I need to connect my old hard drive from my macbook pro (it has been taken out of the computer) to my new macbook pro? I need to transfer files from the old hard drive to the new computer.

What is the exact name of the cable I need to connect my old hard drive from my macbook pro, which has been removed from the computer, to my new macbook pro? I need to transfere files from the old hard drive to the new computer.

No eSATA to USB. Just a SATA/IDE to USB adapter. Google SATA/IDE to USB adapter and you will get tons of links to buy them. Most likely your local computer electronics store has them, although they might be more expensive buying locally than online.
I have several. You can get either USB 2, which what I recommend, or USB 3. USB is backward compatible so a USB 3 adapter will work on a USB 2 port and a USB 2 adapter will work on a USB 3 port. Backward compatible in both directions.
I suggest a USB 2 type because there have been some problems with certain USB 3 devices, the USB 3 interface used isn't all that good in those certain devices. USB 3 is still fairly new where as USB 2 has been around for over 10 years.
synghem wrote:
Thank you LowLuster,
At the apple store they said I needed an esata to usb wire. But looking at wires on line has been confusing. Is sata the same as esata? How do I know if I need a usb 3 or usb 2?

Name of the constraint

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for