NetFlow Collector demo

Hi,
I installed netflow collector demo version 5.0 in a solaris server.
How can i log into web page because it's don't ask me for user and password.
Greats.

Hi,
I think you can obtain that (and more) demo licenses here:
https://tools.cisco.com/SWIFT/Licensing/PrivateRegistrationServlet?DemoKeys=Y.
Good luck!
curtis

Similar Messages

  • Netflow Collector 6.0 demo license

    Hi,
    It is said in the NetFlow Collector Installation and Configuration Guide that a limited-time demo license can be obtained from Cisco.com
    How can i get this demo license?
    Regards,
    Velin

    Hi,
    I think you can obtain that (and more) demo licenses here:
    https://tools.cisco.com/SWIFT/Licensing/PrivateRegistrationServlet?DemoKeys=Y.
    Good luck!
    curtis

  • Using Cisco Prime NAM as Netflow collector

    Hi everybody,
    I would like to know if it's possible to use a Cisco Prime Network Analysis Module for ISR G2  as a NetFlow collector.  A draft of architecture is attached. What I need to do is monitor Gi0/0 and Gi0/2 and produce reports about the total amount of traffic to/from two groups of server in the remote data center. My customer doesn't want to use it's NMS neither wants to use a netflow collector. My company can't install and/or operate any kind of new software or hardware to do this job.  VRF is not a problem, I can monitor them one at a time.
    Reading documentation it seems me that it's possible configuring Netflow as a data source.
    Has any body any experience in tis kind of  config ?
    Thx,
    Enrico

    The detailed view of the CDR based dashlets displays the CDR or CMR data only for the last 30 days.
    The call details of the endpoints prior to 30 days is not displayed by the dashlets, however, the aggregation
    of CDR or CMR data for the endpoints is available for the time period of one year.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/prime/collaboration/10-0/analytics/guide/Cisco_Prime_Collaboration_Analytics_Guide_10.pdf

  • Cisco Netflow Collector 6.0 Data base

    What is the database used by Cisco netflow Collector 6.0 ?

    I guess it is IBM Informix IDS. Read it in one of the old release notes of Cisco NetFlow collector. Iam not sure if anything else is involved.
    Regards,
    Don Thomas Jacob
    ME - NetFlow Analyzer

  • CiscoSecure IDS and Netflow [collector] against DoS

    I think integration between Netflow [collector] and IDS will bring the best tool to detect DoS and DDos.
    Am I right?
    Any plans to have such functionality in future versions of IDS?

    There already is such a product called WANGuard. Search it up on www.andrisoft.com.

  • NetFlow Collector - Java heap space Error

    Hello,
    I have setup NetFlow colector v6 to receive flows from 3 devices, but today, 4 days after i have started the collector, i receive the folowing error and i'm unable to generate reports anymore:
    [2009-01-08 11:13:59 EET] ERROR com.cisco.nfc.report.ReportBuilder - An unexpected error occurred.
    java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
    I searched on net and it seems that i have to set higher heap space memory for java. Does anybody know how to rezolv this issue on Red Hat?
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 5)

    It seem like that the JVM has run out of all the memory that has been allocated to it. You can change the amount of memory allocated for use by your JVM using the -Xms and -Xmx command line parameters.

  • NFC Netflow collector 6.0 & Solaris Cluster

    Hi all
    we are deploying billing systems solutions using NFC. Details as attached image
    details are as follows:
    - All devices on (7600 and 6500) the network is responsible for pushing information on NFC system (called the billing collection system - BCS)
    - BCS system consists of two server install solaris 10 operating system, running active-standby cluster
    - NFC version 6 is installed on each server
    - The server can access shared storage on the storage system
    - Billing server load *.xml files via ftp protocol
    Now, we have two issues that need the support
    •1.     how to solaris cluster detect NFC services down to automatically switch the standby system.
    •2.     After NFC installation, we can not accessible via the web interface. associated tools after installation will not run, java system error (of course we have installed java accompanying DVD)
    We look forward to receiving your help

    Hi,
    I think you can obtain that (and more) demo licenses here:
    https://tools.cisco.com/SWIFT/Licensing/PrivateRegistrationServlet?DemoKeys=Y.
    Good luck!
    curtis

  • 6506 NetFlow

    Hi,
    I'm trying to capture an ingress traffic on SVI interface of my Cisco 6506 (WS-C6506-E).
    I've enabled NetFlow on the Multilayer Switch Feature Card (MSFC):
    ip flow-export source Vlan254ip flow-export version 5ip flow-export destination 172.23.100.21 2055
    Enabled NetFlow and NetFlow Data Export (NDE) on the Policy Feature Card (PFC):
    ip flow ingress layer2-switched vlan 130mls netflow interfacemls flow ip interface-destinationmls nde sender version 5mls aging fast threshold 127mls aging long 1000mls sampling time-based 512mls cef error action resetmls netflow sampling
    and on the monitorable interface:
    interface Vlan130 ip address 172.23.170.2 255.255.255.0 ip flow ingress mls netflow sampling standby 1 ip + timers + priority + preempt + authentication
    Now I'm trying to see capruted flows. The point is I can't see flow's source address, source and destination port, and L4 protocol for unicast flows:
    Cat6506-LAN1#sh mls netflow ipDisplaying Netflow entries in Active Supervisor EARL in module 5DstIP           SrcIP           Prot:SrcPort:DstPort  Src i/f          :AdjPtr-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Pkts         Bytes         Age   LastSeen  Attributes---------------------------------------------------172.23.131.5    0.0.0.0         0   :0      :0        Vl130            :0x0202          52554         2     17:04:35   L2 - Dynamic0.0.0.0         0.0.0.0         0   :0      :0        --               :0x013312        6807977       2     17:04:35   L3 - Dynamic172.23.170.64   0.0.0.0         0   :0      :0        Vl130            :0x00            0             2     17:04:34   L2 - Dynamic172.23.170.123  0.0.0.0         0   :0      :0        Vl130            :0x00            0             2     17:04:35   L2 - Dynamic224.0.0.2       172.23.170.3    udp :1985   :1985     Vl130            :0x02            156           1     17:04:35   Multicast
    224.0.0.2       172.23.170.3    udp :1985   :1985     Vl130            :0x08            624           6     17:28:03   Multicast172.23.170.181  0.0.0.0         0   :0      :0        Vl130            :0x00            0             5     17:28:03   L2 - Dynamic
    The same output info I get on my NetFlow collector.
    Anybody know a reason what can prevent of collecting flows correctly?
    Thanks.

    might want to change the flow mask to full instead of destination. I think that should give you the rest of the info. chris

  • What is "Source ID" in Netflow V9 Packet Header

    Hi,
    My question is regarding the "Source ID" field that appears in Netflow V.9 packet header. Following Cisco link (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk362/technologies_white_paper09186a00800a3db9.pdf) gives Source ID definition as -
    "The Source ID field is a 32-bit value that is used to guarantee uniqueness for all flows exported from a particular device. (The Source ID field is the equivalent of the engine type and engine ID fields found in the NetFlow Version 5 and Version 8 headers). The format of this field is vendor specific. In the Cisco implementation, the first two bytes are reserved for future expansion, and will always be zero. Byte 3 provides uniqueness with respect to the routing engine on the exporting device. Byte 4 provides uniqueness with respect to the particular line card or Versatile Interface Processor on the exporting device."
    I am using "Source ID" (combined with template id) to uniquely identify options templates exported by different routers. At our new lab setup where we have more than one routers configured to export Netflow, I observed that all the routers were exporting "Source ID" value as "0"(zero). It failed my assumption that I had formed based on definition from above Cisco doc.
    I assumed -
    SourceID    Template Id  Unique Key
    source1       256              source1-256
    source1       257              source1-257
    source2       256              source2-256
    source3       258              source3-258
    But, I observed
    SourceID    Template Id  Unique Key
    0                  256              0-256
    0                  257              0-257
    0                  256              0-256
    0                  258              0-258
    Thus, same template id(256) from different routers(source1, source3) eventually form same unique key and breaks my code.
    I would like to know if my interpretation that Source ID can be used to uniquely identify templates in this manner is correct or not ? 
    Is "Source ID" user configurable attribute ? How does it comply to the definition given in above Cisco doc ?
    Thanks,
    Deepak

    Deepak,
    Consider these quotations from the same RFC 3954:
    Section 2: Terminology:
    Observation Point
    An Observation Point is a location in the network where IP packets
    can be observed; for example, one or a set of interfaces on a network
    device like a router. Every Observation Point is associated with an
    Observation Domain.
    Observation Domain
    The set of Observation Points that is the largest aggregatable set of
    flow information at the network device with NetFlow services enabled
    is termed an Observation Domain. For example, a router line card
    composed of several interfaces with each interface being an
    Observation Point.
    Section 7: Template Management:
    A NetFlow Collector that receives Export Packets from several
    Observation Domains from the same Exporter MUST be aware that the
    uniqueness of the Template ID is not guaranteed across Observation
    Domains.
    Section 9: The Collector Side:
    At any given time the Collector SHOULD maintain the following for all
    the current Template Records and Options Template Records: Exporter,
    Observation Domain, Template ID, Template Definition, Last Received.
    Note that the Observation Domain is identified by the Source ID field
    from the Export Packet.
    So in other words, the Source ID is an identifier of the Observation Domain (and in fact, the IPFIX RFC calls this header field directly as Observation Domain ID). Template IDs are unique per Exporter and per Observation Domain, and if a single Exporter uses multiple templates in its different Observation Domains, the IDs of these templates could overlap even in a single Exporter. Observation Domain IDs (that is, Source IDs) identify only the internal structure of a single Exporter, and no provisions are done to preserve their uniqueness across multiple Exporters - for this, the source IP shall be used.
    With respect to whether there can be multiple NetFlow instances on a single router, I am getting a feeling that with decentralized, distributed platforms, multiple linecards in a single router could run their own NetFlow analysis for data that pass through them, so each one provides a separate NetFlow collection. Thus, each linecard or each feature card doing its own NetFlow analysis should be assigned its own unique Observation Domain ID.
    If it is not user configurable then system should automatically form the value based on router engine and line card. But what I have observed, at more than one routers, is that this value is always 0(zero).
    I believe this is strongly dependent to the hardware construction of the router. As a remotely-related example, old 2600 series routers had two WIC slots. If you inserted two WIC-2T modules into these slots, you'd expect that they would be numbered Serial0/0, Serial0/1, Serial1/0, Serial1/1. Very surprisingly, however, these routers considered both slots to be internally connected to a single bus, and the interfaces were named Serial0/0, Serial0/1, Serial0/2 and Serial0/3 - as if they all were installed in a single slot '0'. Something similar may happen to the Observation Domains and their IDs. You would believe that each single linecard constituted a separate Observation Domain. However, the reality may be different, and the whole router can act as a single Observation Domain to the outside world. It's just the way it is constructed - and programmed.
    It is not clear why Cisco doc says that one should use both "Source ID" and "Source IP Address" to properly distinguish between flows.
    I think it's a poor wording in the RFC. I think what they want to say is that if you use the duplet <Source IP, Source ID> to distinguish between flows, then you're fine both for multiple flows from the same Exporter, and for multiple flows from different Exporters.
    Moreover, isn't "Source IP Address" good enough to distinguish between flows from different sources ?
    If an Exporter could truly be partitioned into multiple Observation Domains then the source IP would not be sufficient. I am just making up examples with no real-life backup here, but think of, say, a multi-chassis router with each chassis being one Observation Domain, or each linecard of a distributed switch being a standalone Observation Domain, or one router virtualized to several different contexts and virtual routers, each of them being a unique Observation Domain, reporting about the flows using the same source IP... I think you get the point.
    I would put it this way... The existence of Source ID in NetFlow v9 (and Observation Domain ID in IPFIX) allows these protocols to nicely cope with situations in which a single physical device can be partitioned into several Observation Domains and perform independent reporting on them using a single source IP. However, the fact that these protocols have this ability does not mean that each and every device, even a Cisco router/switch, must necessarily make use of it.
    Best regards,
    Peter

  • How to: Netflow on a L3 Switch WS-C3560X-48P

    Hello Community,
    I want to use netflow on our l3 switches. But my configurations dont work.
    What is my mistake? 
    Modell: WS-C3560X-48P
    Software Version: 15.0(1)SE3
    My Config:
    interface vlan 250
     ip flow monitor Monitor-FNF input
     ip flow monitor Monitor-FNF output
    flow record Record-FNF
     description Flexible NetFlow with NBAR Flow Record
     match ipv4 tos
     match ipv4 protocol
     match ipv4 source address
     match ipv4 destination address
     match transport source-port
     match transport destination-port
     collect routing next-hop address ipv4
     collect transport tcp flags
     collect interface output
     collect counter bytes
     collect counter packets
    flow exporter Export-FNF
     description DescriptionTEXT
     destination [NetFlow collector IP address]
     source vlan50
     transport udp 9001
     export-protocol netflow-v9
    flow monitor Monitor-FNF
     description FNF/NBAR Application Traffic Analysis
     record Record-FNF
     exporter Export-FNF
     cache timeout active 60
     cache timeout inactive 10

    Silly question but do you have a network services module installed? 
    From the documentation: "Flexible NetFlow is supported only on the Catalyst 3750-X and 3560-X switch running the IP base or IP services feature set and equipped with the network services module. It is not supported on switches running the NPE or the LAN base image."
    It actually also mentions: "NetFlow analysis is performed on traffic crossing the physical interfaces on the network services module." 
    Sourced from here: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750x_3560x/software/release/15-0_1_se/configuration/guide/3750xcg/swmnetflow.html

  • Designing Cisco Netflow Architecture ?

    My company isn't using a management system for analyzing the WAN traffic and we want to implement Cisco Netflow to analyse the network traffic on the backbone. We have a huge network with more then 100 sites across the world. We use 120x 2600 routers and 6x 7200 routers.
    Now the question is : How to collect the data into a central place ?
    The routers have netflow activated and they send the netflow information to a netflow collector. Now we need a program that collects the data from the netflow collectors to a central place and analyzes this. I searched the cisco site and found out that cisco uses a Netflow server for that solution. But Cisco has decided to partner with third-party vendors to deliver the Netflow Server product.
    Does Anybody have any ideas ?

    Hi
    if I understand you correctly you need some application to make your netflow data human viewable , right ?
    Take a look at this page, it is a very good listing of different vendors which deliever such products, also some freeware projects are listed ...
    http://www.switch.ch/tf-tant/floma/software.html
    here is a additional listing
    http://www.inmon.com/technology/netflowapps.php
    Michael

  • Couldnot Export Netflow entries in the PFC (hardware switched)

    Hi,
    On the Netflow Collector we are not able to see hardware switched flow entries in PFC, but software switched flow entries in MSFC can be seen. One thing which I have observed in the "show ip cache flow" output I see PFC as standby although the flow entries are there. We did the packet capture on the netflow collector but could not find hardware switched flow entries, so it seems that 6506 is not sending PFC entries.
    Following is the configuration.
    mls aging long 64
    mls aging normal 32
    mls netflow interface
    mls flow ip interface-full
    no mls flow ipv6
    mls nde sender version 5
    mls cef error action reset
    ip flow-cache entries 128000
    ip flow-cache timeout active 1
    ip flow ingress layer2-switched vlan 10,20
    ip flow-export source Loopback0
    ip flow-export version 5
    ip flow-export destination 10.19.20.31 9996
    show ip cache flow
    Displaying software-switched flow entries on the MSFC in Module 5:
    IP packet size distribution (8679322 total packets):
       1-32   64   96  128  160  192  224  256  288  320  352  384  416  448  480
       .132 .142 .325 .166 .082 .046 .019 .015 .006 .000 .001 .000 .001 .000 .013
        512  544  576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608
       .001 .001 .001 .005 .035 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
    IP Flow Switching Cache, 8454644 bytes
      30 active, 127970 inactive, 1523126 added
      438002488 ager polls, 0 flow alloc failures
      Active flows timeout in 1 minutes
      Inactive flows timeout in 15 seconds
    IP Sub Flow Cache, 1040712 bytes
      30 active, 31970 inactive, 1522942 added, 1522942 added to flow
      0 alloc failures, 0 force free
      1 chunk, 1 chunk added
      last clearing of statistics 2w1d
    Protocol         Total    Flows   Packets Bytes  Packets Active(Sec) Idle(Sec)
    --------         Flows     /Sec     /Flow  /Pkt     /Sec     /Flow     /Flow
    TCP-FTP          40819      0.0        10    73      0.3       0.5       3.1
    TCP-FTPD         40607      0.0         3    42      0.1       0.0       1.5
    TCP-WWW           2071      0.0        10   918      0.0       5.1     164.8
    TCP-other        39829      0.0        25   245      0.7       6.6     188.0
    UDP-DNS           1579      0.0         3    92      0.0       6.7     293.7
    UDP-NTP           3309      0.0         2    94      0.0     105.4     195.0
    UDP-TFTP             2      0.0        10    52      0.0     169.3     131.2
    UDP-Frag             5      0.0         1    57      0.0       1.0     299.5
    UDP-other       576228      0.4         2   197      1.1      13.8     285.8
    ICMP             55727      0.0         4   591      0.1     161.5     137.9
    GRE              28899      0.0        45    28      0.9     285.4       1.0
    IP-other        111838      0.0        34   129      2.9     292.4       8.0
    Total:          900913      0.6         9   150      6.5      65.0     202.5
    SrcIf         SrcIPaddress    DstIf         DstIPaddress    Pr SrcP DstP  Pkts
    Gi5/2         172.16.148.254  Tu2           10.191.32.12    2F 0000 0000     2
    Gi5/2         172.16.195.254  Tu4           10.191.32.14    2F 0000 0000     2
    Gi5/2         10.191.32.62    Vl10          10.191.32.12    2F 0000 0000     4
    Displaying hardware-switched flow entries in the PFC (Standby) Module 5:
    SrcIf            SrcIPaddress     DstIf            DstIPaddress    Pr SrcP DstP  Pkts
    Tu5              10.191.8.89      Vl10             10.190.102.240  2F 0000 0000  4780
    Tu5              10.191.8.89      Vl10             10.190.103.89   2F 0000 0000  6218
    Gi5/2            10.122.3.35      Tu4              172.16.33.97    06 008B 105F     1
    Tu5              10.191.8.89      Vl10             10.190.102.123  2F 0000 0000    73
    Tu5              10.124.24.45     Tu2              172.16.148.17   06 0E9F 008B     2
    Tu5              10.124.114.221   Gi5/2            10.129.1.89     06 4E21 04D8   450
    Gi5/2            10.70.72.8       Tu6              172.16.105.242  06 0050 0B3E     5
    show module
    Mod Ports Card Type                              Model             
      5    9  Supervisor Engine 32 8GE (Active)      WS-SUP32-GE-3B    
      6    9  Supervisor Engine 32 8GE (Hot)         WS-SUP32-GE-3B  
    Mod MAC addresses                       Hw    Fw           Sw           Status
      5  001f.6cfe.aba2 to 001f.6cfe.abad   4.6   12.2(18r)SX2 12.2(33)SXH3 Ok
      6  001f.9e9a.ae4c to 001f.9e9a.ae57   4.6   12.2(18r)SX2 12.2(33)SXH3 Ok
    Mod  Sub-Module                  Model              Serial       Hw     Status
    5  Policy Feature Card 3       WS-F6K-PFC3B               2.4    Ok
      5  Cat6k MSFC 2A daughterboard WS-F6K-MSFC2A    4.0    Ok
      6  Policy Feature Card 3       WS-F6K-PFC3B               2.4    Ok
      6  Cat6k MSFC 2A daughterboard WS-F6K-MSFC2A     4.0    Ok
    I have gone through following documents but could not find any clue on why PFC entries are not exported.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/configuration/guide/netflow.html#wp1080827
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_example09186a0080721701.shtml
    Regards,
    Akhtar

    Hi,
    Just to further update this case with troubleshooting results.
    1. I am able to recieve all flows sent from NDE 6506 Switch on NF Collector-A.
    2. Only few flow are being received on NF CollectorB.
    3. When comparing packet captured on NF Collector-A and B, I see only small size UDP packets(~350bytes) on NF Collector B, whereas on NF A I see packets more than 800 bytes...
    This issue is surely pertaining to GRE+IPSEC. I have checked the forums and found issue of ""Self Generated Netflow packets not encrypted"" but my issue not seems to relevant b/c NDE 6506 which is exporting Netflow is not encrypting.......
    Any thoughts !!
    NDE 6506 Switch)----(CORE-6509)----(DC-WAN-1-6506)-----GRE+IPSEC------(DC-WAN-2-6506)------(CORE-6509)-----(DC-AGG)----(DC-ACC)---NF CollectorB
                                          |
                                          |
                                    NF Collector-A

  • Netflow Report

    I am using Netflow collector 6.0 with linux os. I am not able to get source add / Destination Add in the report.
    Could you please help me out.

    Hi. I want to help you with this issue, but I think I need more information. Could you please tell me if you are receiving any error messages when pulling this report? Could you please upload a screenshot here of what you do see, and describe how that differs from what you expect?
    Thanks,
    -Joe

  • Netflow not reporting Egress traffic on 6509 Vlan

    Hi...
    We have a pair of 6509 working in a VSS configuration (IOS 12.2(33)SX5). The 6509s connect to a pair of ASAs (7.2 code) running in an Active/Standby setup. These ASAs in turn connect to routers going to remote sites. I have configured Netflow on the following VLANS,
    VLAN 10 - Servers Vlan
    VLAN 9 - Transit/ASA VLAN (connects ASAs to 6509s). All traffic originating from any VLAN on the 6509 crosses this VLAN in order to reach remote                 sites and vice versa
    I configured the netflow source VLAN 11 although I am not collecing any netflow from it.
    Although I have been getting lots of Netflow info, I noticed that netflow for traffic originating from any user VLAN on the 6509s going to any remote site via TRANSIT/ASA VLAN(9) does not get reported, I even tested with 4 GB traffic but no result. Only reverse traffic (i.e. from remote site to user VLAN) is reported as it traverses the Transit VLAN (9).
    I read somewhere that egress netflow is not supported in 6500, but isnt traffic originating from a user vlan to a remote site via the transit VLAN (9) considered ingress with respect to the transit VLAN (9)? 
    I would like to know whether bidirectional Netflow is supported on 6500 VLANS. I have mimimum control on routers beyond the ASAs, and since these ASAs run 7.2 code netflow is not supported, and Monitoring this Transit Vlan gives me extremely useful info.
    I do get netflow biderectional traffic from the Server Vlan 10, but I think it is correlated by the netflow collector from vlans 9 and 10
    Below is a show run | inc flow
    ip flow-cache timeout active 1
    ip flow ingress layer2-switched vlan 9,10
    mls netflow interface
    mls flow ip interface-full
    interface vlan 9
    ip flow ingress
    ip flow egress
    interface vla 10
    ip flow ingress
    ip flow egress
    ip flow-export source vlan11
    ip flow-export version 9
    ip flow-export destination 10.10.10.10 2055
    All help is appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    So if I want to capture traffic out only one specific interface is there any option to do that in catalyst 6500.
    If I made only that specific interface in another vlan and if under the interface vlan , I give "ip flow ingress" will this capture the outgoing traffic through the interface while it is doing intervlan routing. Also is it must to give ip address in that vlan interface ? Please clarify.

  • Netflow export on Cisco 2821

    Hello,
    a question or more a problem with netflow exports on Cisco 2821's.
    I configured netflow export on a Cisco 2821 with IOS Version 12.4(24)T
    ip cef
    interface FastEthernet0/0/0
    description to XXX
    ip address XXX
    ip flow ingress
    ip flow egress
    duplex full
    speed 10
    ip flow-cache timeout active 1
    ip flow-export source GigabitEthernet0/0
    ip flow-export version 5
    ip flow-export destination XXX XXX
    The netflow collector shows "only ingoing traffic" on interface FastEthernet0/0/0 and
    "only outgoing traffic" on interface GigabitEthernet0/0.
    Same problem with an IOS Version 12.4(20)T1 on other Cisco 2821's.
    But same configuration on other Cisco 2821's with IOS Version 12.4(11)XJ4 work well.
    Any references/suggestions or explanations?

    #It's surprising to me that it's even possible to configure both directions on a single interface.
    #It's generally not a good idea to configure both directions among interfaces on a single router.
    --> It is possible. ;-) I need QoS (DSCP information) for ingoing traffic and
    --> and for outgoing traffic of this interface FastEthernet0/0/0.
    #How's g0/0 configured "ip flow" wise?
    --> There's no netfow configuration on this interface, only on Fa0/0/0.
    -->#sh ip flow interface
    --> FastEthernet0/0/0
    -->  ip flow ingress
    -->  ip flow egress
    #Maybe you're seeing "only outgoing traffic" on
    #interface GigabitEthernet0/0, because those are incoming traffic through fa0/0/0
    #(where IOS ignores the "ip flow egress" part) and flowing out through g0/0?
    --> You're right. The outgoing traffic at Gi0/0 is the ingoing traffic at Fa0/0/0.
    --> But I don't think thath the configuration is wrong and I think that the
    --> "ip flow egress" command on an single interface is not so special.
    --> I really looks like that the command "ip flow egress" on interface Fa0/0/0
    --> is being ignored. But why?
    --> May be I should start an other discussion with a link to this posting in the
    --> router forum.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Photoshop CS3 crashes upon open/new file everytime

    I have a Photoshop CS3 and have been using it daily since purchasing in August 2008.  Never had any issues until now.  Photoshop will load but when I try to open a file or create a new file, photoshop crashes....please help. Macbook Pro - purchased A

  • Has anyone tried to use Elements 9 on their Mac and had problems?

    Trying to use Elements 9 on my mac, but find that the create and effects editing part of the package are not working. Does anyone else have this problem?

  • Problem in J1IG transaction

    Dear All, when iam doing incoming invoice J1IG for Depot STO system is saying Material is not exist in the document. But when iam checking the J1IIN and MIGO and MMBE stock is very much showing with Batch. Could any one light on this. Kesai sai

  • Variants Class (300) Extraction

    Dear All, I have enhanced this structure to capture material characteristics I am using the sap standard function VC_I_GET_CONFIGURATION for which I am passing the CUOBJ field (which is captured in VBAP at the time of sales order creation) as an requ

  • Cant get support, product needs rma!!

    I cant submit a ticket for my device no matter what browser i use... Im trying to RMA my N5902 keyboard/remote and the ticket system only lists the N5901. I submitted a ticket anyway using the N5901 and an older OS (vista, im on 7), and submit it but