New implementation scenario.

Scenario: I have the following issue at hand and want to check if there is an existing/alternative solution before implementing my own.
I want to create a QBC taxonomy. I want to classify docuents, based on the value assigned to a custom property for the documents.
I believe following are the steps:
1- create property
2- create classification index
3- create taxonomy and categories within
4- create query condition for each category
5- assign values to the property for each document
6- define KM Navigation iView that display categories
Now I'm on step5. I want to assign values to a lot of documents. But instead of manually doing it, I want to create a web application that takes the following input values: repository path; a property name; a value.
Please let me know if there are alternate ways to achieve the same.
Also, if you already have a solution and won't mind sharing it, I would be more than happy to use you codebase: [email protected]
Best Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumaran,
You can do that automatically, but you must develop it using SAP Developer Studio. There is not other alternative.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/kmc/knowledge management and collaboration developers guide.html
Patricio.

Similar Messages

Inventory Management, New Snapshot Scenario

We are planning to implement the New Snapshot scenario for Inventory Management. This is based on the "How to...." document. As per what is shown in the document, all the 3 extractors feed into the same DSO. However, when I try to create the Update Rules for <b>BX</b>, I get a error that there is no key figure. However, the DSO (Standard) has the Key figures. These are cummulative. Maybe, because of that I get the error when I create update rules for BX. But then, in the document the key figures appear. How is this possible.
Has anyone tried this and has been successful. If so, I'd appreciate if you could send some tips.
Thanks

hello
can you please take a screenshot of your data model and update rules (inside) and send me to (see email in card)
It will really help me!
Alex

Need two implementation scenarios

Hi,
I am very new to this forum..have one requirement.
Need two implementation scenarios depends on the document type..
when i create shopping cart with one document type it needs to trigger one and others for another scenario..
Would it be possible to do
kuber

Hi,
You can use BADI (BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI )
a) make use ECS, if Classic scenario configuration exist
b) or activatated Extended Classic Scenario , need to make Classic scenario.
Hope it will work for you.
Thanks,
Rahul Mandale

Implementation scenarios relating to SD

Hi ,
Can some one pl let me know the implementation scenarios relating to SD module..
I am new to SD field...Could u please suggest me some important areas i should concentrate ..
Thanks in anticipation.
Regards
Atahar

Link: http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1500/BL_India/index.htm
Preconfigured Scenario's for: Sales
Here as you select the scenario & further go into it, you will ger the Business Process as well as configuration guide. These are very helpful & knowledgable information.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

QISR1 - New implementation with Enhancement Spot

Hello ,
I created new Z Scenario then created new badi implemenation for QISR1 and specified Z filter value.
When i try to activate the implmenetation i get message
Implementation ZIM_QISR_ZS63 migrated (see long text for instructions)
Popup screen is diplayed 'Select or Create Enhancement Implemenation'
Then I created new Enhancement Implemenation - ZIM_QISR1_ZS63
But the badi implemenation does not get activated. Please can you help
Thanks
Meghana

Can you please elaborate, what exactly is the requirement? Do you want that the message should be displayed as warning & processing should continue or something else?

What is the fi responsibility for new implementation project

hai. gurus
please give me complete suggestion about fi responsibility for fi module in new implementation
bye
pooja

Hi
If you will see the phases of implementation in a SAp project like
Project preparetion
BBP(Business Blue print)
Realisation(Base level configuartion,unit testing,iNtegration testing)
Go live and support.
During BBP stage you have to study the existing process of the client and suggest how it will be mapped in SAP.And the process which can not be mapped in SAP will be treated as GAP and may be solved through out side software or through ABAP development.
Finalisining the Enterprise structure.The mapping of the org stru in legacy to SAP to be done here.Since for company thwo important statement are prepared at the yearend like B& S & p&l.These two statments can not prepared unless company code is mapped and assigned to other logistic structure.
Integration testing is another important milestone in an implementation. In this stage you have to see that the FI T code is not only working stand alone but it also works in an integrated scenario.
These are some of the scenario, where you have to contribute as a FICO consultant. Since the data flows from other modules of SAP to FI module , you should take care for that
cjheers
surendra

Problem in creating new implementation for filter dependent badi

Hi Experts,
I want to use badi NOTIF_EVENT_POST.It is a filter dependent badi. It is asking filter type while implementing thro se19. Could anyone pls tel me how to create new implementation for the filter dependent badi. Existing filter type is QMART. is there any problem if i change the filter type?
Thanks in Advance!

Hi ,
NOTIF_EVENT_POST is filter dependent and filter values are based on QMART value in table TQ80. You need to specify the filter value ie : QMART value before implimentation , before that check all active implimentations for the same , if u have to impliment on same filter value , you need to deactivate the one which is implimented on same filter value .
You are not supposed to change the filter type.
Regards,
Vamsi
Edited by: CH. VAMSHI on Sep 29, 2009 11:58 AM

NEW GL Scenario

Hi,
Please explann the config required in new gl Scenario node for config.
Thanks

Hi Nitin,
Please find config steps
1. Define Ledgers for General Ledger Accounting
SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)>Ledgers-->Define Ledgers for General Ledger Accounting
For ex: 1 is for IFRS and another one is for local GAAP
Ledger                 Description                          Totals table
IF     For IFRS(Intl fin rep stds)             FAGLFLEXT
ZU     For US reporting             FAGLFLEXT
2.Define and Activate Non-Leading Ledgers
SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)>Ledgers-->Define and Activate Non-Leading Ledgers
input your non leading ledger and enter your parallel currencies
3. Assign Scenarios and Customer Fields to Ledgers
SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)>Ledgers-->Assign Scenarios and Customer Fields to Ledgers
For non leading ledger(each ledger) you can select scenarios for updations
Cost Center Update
Profit Center Update
Segmentation
4. Define Ledger Group
SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)>Ledgers-->Define Ledger Group
This is optional. If you want to group Non leading ledgers you can group it.

Here's a tough one: can Infotype data be loaded into a new implementation?

We have an R/3 system that is going to be replaced with Netweaver; not upgraded, but a new implementation, and thats because there was too much customizing, and we're only using the HR module.
Can we load all of the infotype data from the old R/3 system into the new ECC system? Normally it is impossible to re-create all the history from a previous system in SAP, but for Infotypes, maybe? No? Assuming that the infotype configurations are the same?
I see infotypes as fairly static tables that are only added to by changes, or by certain actions. No changes could be made to these older infotype records, but at least BW could extract all of these and present in an ODS a continuous view of history.
Am I right? Is this possible to load up the infotype tables?
I know there will be problems with double infinity records, but I think we can handle that one.

We have an R/3 system that is going to be replaced with Netweaver; not upgraded, but a new implementation, and thats because there was too much customizing, and we're only using the HR module.
Can we load all of the infotype data from the old R/3 system into the new ECC system? Normally it is impossible to re-create all the history from a previous system in SAP, but for Infotypes, maybe? No? Assuming that the infotype configurations are the same?
I see infotypes as fairly static tables that are only added to by changes, or by certain actions. No changes could be made to these older infotype records, but at least BW could extract all of these and present in an ODS a continuous view of history.
Am I right? Is this possible to load up the infotype tables?
I know there will be problems with double infinity records, but I think we can handle that one.

BI version to install for new implementation

Hello,
I am a technical consultant for a new implementation of BW with the requirement of SEM-BPS. We are considering installing NW2004s with BI Content 7.0. However since it is so new we are wondering about the stability. We are also not sure if we are losing any functionality with the latest version.
My question is should we install the latest BI version or go with BW 3.5 which the consultants are familiar with and has been out there for a long time.
Since BW 3.5 is part of Netweaver 2004, I believe it should be supported until at least 2010.
Thank you, George Barta

Hi:
There are already more than 35 customers live on BI in SAP NetWeaver 2004s, with more than 500 active projects.
You definitely should go with 2004s, as it can do everything 3.5 can do but so much more. You can avoid an upgrade in the near term by simply starting with BI in SAP NetWeaver 2004s.
You are not losing functionality with the new version. As stated before, there is a 3.5 system "under the covers".
However, note that BI Integrated planning is the new version of the planning application. SEM-BPS will continue to be supported going forward, but SAP will not invest in developing it anymore. Instead, all development resources flow into BI Integrated planning.
Both SEM-BPS and BI Integrated planning are available in BI in SAP NetWeaver 2004s, you can choose which one to utilize (and can have a mix of the two running in the same system). Note that there are no automated migration tools between the 2. Would be good to take the SAP going forward plan into account when determining your strategy.
Thanks for the points -
Regards -
Ron Silberstein
SAP

A new Business Scenario Mapping in SAP

Hi,
I have a new business scenario with one of my client.
Business Scenario is like this:
1. Material needs to be transferred to government agencies. Inventory should be deducted from my plant and should be displayed with govt agencies.
2. They will do some reseach work on the material and send the material back to my client. There will not be any change in the property of the material.
3. Material is excisable. But for this scenario since govt is involved no sales tax and nill excise.
4. If govt will not be able to transfer all the material back, they will pay for the differences. For example, we have sent 100 tonne material and we have received back only 99.5 Tonne. Govt will pay charge for 0.5 tonne.
Since the place where i am sending the material doesn't belong to my own entity/premise, legaly i cant create a new plant and use STO.
Requirement is to have inventory deducted from my plant upon transfer to govt, so i cant use sub contracting in MM also. Because in case of Sub Contracting the material will be valuated at my plant only.
Your help in this regard will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Mihir

Hi,
You can create the governemnt agency as subcontracting vendor and using movement type 331or333 or335 i.e for sampling you transfer the goods with nil servicecharge or cost and then take it back .As you say if they are returning only partial quantity then act accordingly.
Regards

MDT New Computer Scenario - Include a standard account in the build

I am a developer, but as part of my development workflow I am regularly setting up new virtual machines for testing, etc. I've been trying to automate the build process for some time, but as I'm not a deployment specialist it's all a bit new to me. I recently
discovered MDT, and it looks like it is the tool I should have found ages ago, but there's one aspect of my requirements that doesn't seem to get mentioned in any of the tutorials or scenarios I've seen so far.
When I set up a deployment image, I'd like to include in it a standard local user account ("Tester") that will be available on all the builds. I don't have a domain in my environment, so using a domain account isn't possible.
Is it possible to do this? None of the "New Computer" scenario descriptions talk about setting up accounts - account management seems to be in the "Replace" or "Refresh" scenarios, where the emphasis is on retaining existing
accounts on the target computer, not adding accounts to the image. Is it as simple as pausing the image build and creating the account manually on the image?
I'm not sure how relevant it is, but my environment doesn't have anything like PXE boot, so I'll be expecting to ultimately create an offline install ISO image for the target computer deployment, and I'd like everything needed to be present in that ISO.
Thanks for any help.
Paul

Hi,
Considering your description in this link:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/6c1c41df-63bb-464d-8aa7-5a092f30c06a/setting-up-a-sysprepped-image-with-user-account-customisations?forum=w8itproinstall
I think this link can be helpful for you (I already pasted in the link above)
Windows 8 Start Screen Customization with MDT
http://blogs.technet.com/b/deploymentguys/archive/2012/10/26/start-screen-customization-with-mdt.aspx
It can help you understand how to customize the start screen with MDT.
Regardsing to the "Setting up your Apps", it is first Sign-in Animation, usually for new users, you can disable it
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\EnableFirstLogonAnimation , set its value
to 0,
here's an example you can refer to
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/lync/en-US/91839d35-49da-4ba2-b6b2-7b448e5f22a4/can-we-skip-the-long-windows-8-intro-video-each-time-a-new-user-logs-onto-a-machine?forum=w8itproinstall
Yolanda Zhu
TechNet Community Support

What does FDS stand for in new implementation?

What does FDS stand for in new implementation?
Thanks,
Jess...

Functional Development Specifications
Some variations:
FS - Functional Specification
HLDS - High Level Development Specification
FD - Functional Development
etc.
Basically it is documenting how the business requirement is in preparation for development.
The above is typically further translated into TS - Technical Specification.

What are duties of conversion specialist in a new implementation

hi,
i am new to sap, and would be glad if someone could explain me the duties of a conversion specialist in a new implementation with some examples so that i can learn conevrsion programs

Hi,
Along with what Ravi has mentioned some of the other responsibilities include.
>> Define the migration strategy
>> Define cut over strategy
>> Define conversion mapping rules
>> Define Data Validation strategy along with the business users
>> Define data massaging rules
Some useful links:
http://www.tuiconsulting.com/data-migration-and-conversion.htm
http://www.atosorigin.com/en-us/Services/Solutions/Systems_Integration/Technologies_Expertise/Databases_Data_Migration/
http://www.databaseanswers.org/data_migration/general_migration_approach.htm
Cheers
VJ
Message was edited by: Vijayendra Rao

Service procurement & implementation scenario in SRM 7.0

Hi Guys,
I would like to know if in SRM 7.0 the new Service Procurement External Staffing scenario would work in the Extended classic scenario implementation? Or is this only supported in standalone?
Do we have to custom build the document exchange between ECC - SRM - SUS for confirmation and invoice documents like in SRM 5.0. I am searching for a possibilty to let the service agents themselfs fill in the confirmation with the service entry sheet.
If the extended classic scenario is supported then we are quickly done. Other possibility is to let an existing web application (to capture time sheets) generate a XML confirmation message and send this message to EBP via XI. This way the hours can also be captured. Invoicing can then by handled e.g. by ERS. What do you think?
Thx.
Skander

Hi Muthu,
Thx for your response, but these blogs do not provide an anwser to my question. I have read the release documentation of SRM 7.0, but even then I still have the above question.
Will this business scenario work in combination witht the extended classsic scenario (and how does SUS fits in this picture)?
Kind Regards,
Skander
Edited by: Skander Essaim on Jul 7, 2009 2:12 AM

New implementation scenario.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for