Implementation scenarios relating to SD

Hi ,
Can some one pl let me know the implementation scenarios relating to SD module..
I am new to SD field...Could u please suggest me some important areas i should concentrate ..
Thanks in anticipation.
Regards
Atahar

Link: http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1500/BL_India/index.htm
Preconfigured Scenario's for: Sales
Here as you select the scenario & further go into it, you will ger the Business Process as well as configuration guide. These are very helpful & knowledgable information.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

Similar Messages

Implementing a relational task database with recurrence using the Outlook 2013 calendar

Hello,<o:p></o:p>
I am looking to implement a relational task database whereby recurring tasks are instantiated at fixed frequencies. I have a number of custom attributes that I want to assign to all tasks in
this database. Outlook/Exchange seem like they may not provide the ability to customise attributes in a powerful enough way for this purpose. However, Outlook/Exchange have powerful recurrence logic which I would like to avoid re-writing. I was wondering if
you might have any suggestions for where to look for either a third party task database product that provides recurrence or whether you think this could be sensibly built into
the Outlook/Exchange environment. Also, we are heavy users of MS CRM, so, ideally, the solution would reside there. However, unfortunately, MS CRM does not seem to have a powerful recurrence engine like Outlook/Exchange do.<o:p></o:p>
Many thanks.<o:p></o:p>
Keith<o:p></o:p>
R K Howard

Good Idea. But I'm afraid there is no build-in function in Outlook/Exchange environment so far. Have you considered the solution from Microsoft Dynamics ?
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics/default.aspx
Tony Chen
TechNet Community Support

Need two implementation scenarios

Hi,
I am very new to this forum..have one requirement.
Need two implementation scenarios depends on the document type..
when i create shopping cart with one document type it needs to trigger one and others for another scenario..
Would it be possible to do
kuber

Hi,
You can use BADI (BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI )
a) make use ECS, if Classic scenario configuration exist
b) or activatated Extended Classic Scenario , need to make Classic scenario.
Hope it will work for you.
Thanks,
Rahul Mandale

Scenario related to NAC server with hight availabily

Hello
am looking for good scenario related to NAC server with hight availabily, mentioned the how it works,how the phisical coonection could be to each Core?what is the P-service..
Thanks for ur time

Hi,
Here's the documentation regarding the HA setup:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/security/nac/appliance/installation_guide/hardware/47/hi_ha.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/ps6128/products_configuration_example09186a00808fbc0f.shtml
HTH,
Faisal

Qty Blocking scenario related to GR Based Invoice Verification

Friends,
I'm facing issues related to automatic deletion of Qty blocking reason during LIV.
Scenario is like below:
GR1 Qty = 5
IR1 Qty = 7
This invoice is posted by system but blocked for payment due to Qty variance.
Expectation is that store person should GR for balance 2 qty.
However even when this additional GR is posted, it is appearing as separate line item in PO History also and is not linked to IR1 and qty block against that invoice remains as it is there and it can not be released in MRBR automatic release functionality.
However, it's working fine in case if there is No GR Based IN activated for PO Line item.
is it a standard thing that we can't implement Qty blocking scenario ( & obviously it's auto release after reqd GR ) for GR Based IV scene.

Thanks PRIYA for prompt reply as usual.
You are right , system will expect additional GR for diff qty.
However issue is that even I post this additional GR for 2 qty , system is not relasing this blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
However, if i test same scenario for PO item NOT having GR based-IV tick...system automatically release such qty blocked invoice in MRBR once it find additional GR posted against same PO line item.
But i case of GR based IV, system is not linking this additional GR to pending qty blocked invoice.
just FYI, However invoice blcoking due to price variance is working fine ( iwth reqd PO Line item price change, system is able to release this price blocked invoice automatically in MRBR automatic release function.
I believe you might have qty blocking scenario for GR Based IV cases in your any of previous projects. if yes, pls advise me.
Thanks in advance.

Service procurement & implementation scenario in SRM 7.0

Hi Guys,
I would like to know if in SRM 7.0 the new Service Procurement External Staffing scenario would work in the Extended classic scenario implementation? Or is this only supported in standalone?
Do we have to custom build the document exchange between ECC - SRM - SUS for confirmation and invoice documents like in SRM 5.0. I am searching for a possibilty to let the service agents themselfs fill in the confirmation with the service entry sheet.
If the extended classic scenario is supported then we are quickly done. Other possibility is to let an existing web application (to capture time sheets) generate a XML confirmation message and send this message to EBP via XI. This way the hours can also be captured. Invoicing can then by handled e.g. by ERS. What do you think?
Thx.
Skander

Hi Muthu,
Thx for your response, but these blogs do not provide an anwser to my question. I have read the release documentation of SRM 7.0, but even then I still have the above question.
Will this business scenario work in combination witht the extended classsic scenario (and how does SUS fits in this picture)?
Kind Regards,
Skander
Edited by: Skander Essaim on Jul 7, 2009 2:12 AM

Oracle RAC implementation scenario

Hello DB Experts,
I have got a very specific business scenario to be implemented.
Basically we need to implement 2 Node RAC infrastructure.
But in this on each node we have 2 oracle instances running.
Now is it possible to have one Instance running on Active / Active mode and another instance in Active / Passive mode.
First of all i want to know it is possible to implement RAC in this manner.
If yes, then for Active / Passive instance if Active instance goes down how to switch the traffic to the passive node? Or basically i want to know how do i make that passive node active?
Would really appreciate some quick response.
Thanks,
Darshan

Lets assume some better names for this discussion...
RAC Database MYDB (instance on node1 = MYDB1, instance on node2=MYDB2)
SI Database URDB (instance on node1 = URDB with active/passive on node2)
Can this be done? Yes. But why? You can use SERVICES to limit on which node your application is accessing.

Oracle EBS R12 implementation scenarios

Dear All,
We have below 3 different scenarios, please give your comments/suggestions; keep in mind client wants cheeper solution.
HP DL580 G5 servers will be used with 64bit Redhat Linux 5.0 on all scenarios.
Scenario 1:)
Oracle EBS R-12 implementation with RAC & Load Balancer
Required H/W - 8 Server (4 Production & 4 UAT / Development), Hardware Load balancer
Software - RHEL 5.0 OS
Licenses - Oracle RAC
Advantages – High Availability solution, Redundancy
Disadvantages – Specialized network administrator required for load balancer management, Complex System and costly
Scenario 2:)
Oracle EBS implementation with Active Passive mode / fail safe
Required H/W - 8 Server, 4 Production (2 active & 2 passive) & 4 UAT / Development as replica of production environment
Software - RHEL 5.0 OS & Cluster software on OS Level clustering
Licenses – OS Cluster from Red Hat
Advantages – OS Level clustering is cheaper compared to Oracle RAC
Disadvantages – 2 Servers will used as Passive will not be optimally utilized they will only come into play when primary servers fail.
Scenario 3:)
Oracle EBS implementation Dual tier (DB & APPS)
Option – I (Active + Active)
Required H/W – 2 Servers for production and 2 UAT / Development as replica of production environment
Software – RHEL 5.0 OS & Cluster software on OS Level clustering
Licenses - OS Cluster from Red Hat
Advantages – All the servers are optimally utilized
Disadvantages -if one of the servers fails you might experience performance issues as both application and database services run on one node till server that failed is brought live.
Option – II (Active / Stand BY)
Required H/W - 2 Servers for production and 2 UAT / Development as replica of production environment, 2 server of UAT will be configured for stand by
Software – Oracle data guard
Licenses – oracle data guard
Advantages – Simple configuration and easy to maintain when compared to RAC and OS clustering
2) Will not experience performance problems when one of the primary fail .This is achieved by shutting down UAT or test instances till the issue on primary server is addressed
Disadvantages - Sudden spike in load cannot be addressed since load balancing feature is not available.
Best Regards,

Scenario 1:) Oracle EBS R-12 implementation with RAC & Load Balancer
When designing for "High Availability", this is quite a common infrastructure. It is pretty straightforward, though you are right, you need additional skills in managing RAC and Network. On the other hand, most larger companies have load balancers operational already. RAC may be expensive, however, if you want availability, it is what you will have to pay for, if you really cannot afford any downtime. Consider RAC when either of the following will be answered "No"
1) Can your customer really not afford more (unplanned) downtime than 20 minutes.
2) Is the maximum size of your hardware (single node database tier) sufficient to handle the amount of concurrent users in peak and will it be able to handle the expected growth for the next 12 months.
If either of the above questions answers no, consider RAC. Otherwise, one of the two alternative scenarios will probably be better.
Scenario 2:) Oracle EBS implementation with Active Passive mode / fail safe
This scenario requires additional skills as well: OS Cluster Administration skills. The main advantage in this situation is that the architecture in which EBS has to operate is quite simple. No clustering (EBS will operate on one db node and one appnode). Issues you might encounter: If dbnode fails, what will your appnode do? Will it have to be restarted? What about downtime in such a case? How much can you afford (see scenario 1). You will end up with some 'dirty' data in your database (concurrent manager). It might be necessary to clean that out first.
Another question to answer is how much do you trust your hardware/os. If it (almost) never failed on you for the past years, why would it be different in this situation. Having an active/passive cluster can be a costly architecture as well (half of your capacity being passive...)
Scenario 3:) Oracle EBS implementation Dual tier (DB & APPS)
Option – I (Active + Active)
I suspect you mean to establish a cluster that runs database package on node 1 and application package on node 2, each of them having the other node as failover node. In this situation, you will definitely encounter a performance degradation, but this can be managed by oversizing each of the nodes and/or defining a threshold for performance degradation and keeping this in mind when sizing the hardware. You would still need the cluster managing skills, though.
Option – II (Active / Stand BY)
This option will deliver you more High Availability, because this is a truly disaster resilient solution. Dataguard will duplicate the database, taking away the Single Point Of Failure(SPOF), which the database is in all previous scenarios. You should keep in mind though that the UAT environment will be affected by the standby database activity (not very much, but nevertheless). You will need additional skills, like Dataguard administration skills. I could argue about your statement that it will be easy to maintain, compared to RAC. However, like I said in my comments about Scenario 2, the operational architecture for EBS is quite simple in this architecture as well. Consider the implications on the application tier when your database switches/fails over to the standby.
Conclusion: There is no yes/no to each of the proposed scenarios. You will have to discuss with your customer to find out what the requirements are on a business level and translate them to an IT solution.
The solution should meet the needs for which it is realized and the people should be able to manage/maintain the solution. Additionally, the investment should be in line with the solution the customer requires.
Regards,
Arnoud Roth
Oracle E-Business Suite Technical Architect
Inter Access
The Netherlands

ESS Business Package implementation and relation to KM

Hi
WE are implementing ESS/MSS in our customer location.
We already imported all the ESS related businesspackages.
After importing, we are getting this error, when we are goingthrough all the pages.
is there any relation for implementation of ESS MSS business packages with KM?
please help me to resolve this.
Portal Runtime Error
An exception occurred while processing a request for :
iView : N/A
Component Name : N/A
iView not found: com.sap.km.cm.docs.
Exception id: 12:41_22/01/08_0030_45923050
See the details for the exception ID in the log file

>
Debasish Sarkar wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> SAP_WebDynpro_XSS should point to the J2EE server where the XSS components are installed.
>
> <Host_name>:5<NN>00 where NN is the instance no.
>
> For the other systems. it should point to the ECC system where the coponents are installed.
> To find the port no. of the ECC system, goto tran SMICM, the select Goto from top level menu -> select services. There you will find the host name with the port no.
>
> Regards
> Deb
Deb,
Thank you very much for your response. You made very clear the question I had about <host Name>:<Port>.
However, When I put those settings into the "system" and then i try to test i get the following results:
SAP Web AS Connection
Test Details:
The test consists of the following steps:
1. Checks the validity of system ID in the system object.
2. Checks if the system can be retrieved from the PCD.
3. Check whether a SAP system is defined in the system object
4. Validate the following parameters: WAS protocol; WAS host name
5. Checks if the host name of the server can be resolved.
6. Pings the server to see if it is alive.
7. Pings the WAS ping service; works only if the service is activated on the ABAP WAS.
8. Checks HTTP/S connectivity to the defined back-end application
Results
1. The system ID is valid
2. The system was retrieved.
3. The system object represents an SAP system
4. The following parameters are valid: Web AS Protocol (http) Web AS Host Name (bus0230.baldor.com:53600)
5. The host name bus0230.baldor.com was resolved successfully.
6. The server bus0230.baldor.com could not be pinged successfully.
Should I be concerned that the server cannot be ping successully? I see that step 7 says this will only be sucessful if the services is activated on teh ABAP WAS. So i am thinking this test will not complete successfully?
Best Regards,
Steven

Implementation scenario

Hi everyone
I need an implementation advice from all the experts. My requirement is that we need to send purchase orders and recieve confirmation to sap systems. we are sending the purchase orders to a webservice.
The general idea was to use idocs to send purchase orders and to recieve the confirmation into the same idoc or a different one. but with idocs syncronous communication is not possible. so what i am thinking is develop an rfc which has the request and resposes and it can populate the required idocs.
i came to know that using idocs or flatfiles i can achieve asynch-synch communications by using modules . but it is from SP 19 , we don't have SP 19 we have SP 10. so i guess its not an option. moreover modules are being dealt with JMS adapter . its not clear why to use JMS adapter here.
are there any better approches to it other than upgrading to SP 19?
is using RFC for this situation a better solution?
Thanks XI experts

Sudheer,
Due to some of the constraints you are having using RFC would be the wise option. Send the data to the webservice to the SOAP adapter and map the response back to the RFC.
Check this weblogs for more information of this integration:
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/03/23/rfc--xi--webservice--a-complete-walkthrough-part-1
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/03/28/rfc--xi--webservice--a-complete-walkthrough-part-2
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2008/01/08/troubleshooting--rfc-and-soap-scenarios-updated-on-20042009
Regards,
---Satish

CUA Implemention scenario...

Hello All,
We are about to implement a CUA in landscape..
There are two scenarios that are currently in focuss..
Scenario 1: To have DEVELOPMENT CLIENT act as CUA for clients of all systems in the landscape.
Scenario 2: To have DEV CLIENT as CUA for clients of all Developement systems , QA client as CUA for clients of all QA systems and PRD CLIENT as CUA for clients of all Production systems .
Please let me know the pros/cons of having either of scenarios for the landscape.
Regards,
Ajit

Hi,
As per my knowledge, CUA will simplify the Security admin's job.
in your case, if you have many SAP system landscapes - more production systems...and large number of users... then set a seperate CUA client for PRD systems. or if there are different bussiness entities, then go for different CUA clients respectively.
if you setup a CUA client for each environment, means you are minimising the clients you access each time. but the work time/load will not impact as expected benefit from CUA. if you setup single CUA client, the security admin job will be done in a single shot.
otherwise;
->if you have Solution manager, setup CUA client there and integrate with other systems like ECC and BI.
it will help at the time of license audits and earlywatch checks also.
->if you are not using Solution manager then you can use Quality client or Dev client for all your landscapes.
Note; At the time of new user creation, the CUA system will not create the usermasters in all systems by default. Based on our systems selection, it will create the user masters in respective systems. (Majority users will have only production access).
To understand the more CUA benifits refer to; CUA Project Propsal Questions
You can see the CUA Integration doc; http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/8302a929-0501-0010-05b5-d48f544bc572&overridelayout=true
Hope that helps
Cheers
Praveen.

Help implementing scenario

Hi again,
I need help implementing the next scenario (simplified):
- One material can have N discounts.
- On ODS A I have 'Material' and 'Customer' as characteristics and 'Amount of the sell' as ratio.
- On ODS B I have 'Material' and 'Discount Type' as characteristics and 'Amount of discount' as ratio.
I'm using a MultiProvider for the queries that needs the detail of the discounts.
How can I create a query that shows the Amount of sell for materials that have discount of type '3' ?
If i use a filter for discount type '3' I won't get any amount of sell.
thanks in advance

Hi Juan,
you can use a prequery for your problem. That means, you use a Query to fill a variable.
Build a Query A with material in the rows and a filter with 'Discount Type' = '3'.
Then define a variable for material with the option for 'processing by' = 'Replacement path'. fill out the other fields and press next. Here select for Query the before defined Query A. now next and finish.
The last step is to define the query with material and Amount of sells. In this query use the defined variable for material.
That's it.
Hope the english is understandable.
regards
Alex

Implementing Drag & Relate

Hi,
I am working on Drag & Relate functionality in EP. Can any one tell me the steps to implement the Drag & Relate.
I read in some document, in iview properties we need to make Drag& Relate Target as True. But i didnt find any property with that name for iviews. For which iviews i can find that.
Thanks,
Satish

Hi Satish,
Check the settings under Default Framework Page,
Content Administration->Portal Content->Content by SAP->End User Content->Standard User->Default FrameWork page
Open the Default Framework Page, select Desktop Inner Page and selct Open.
Check the boxes against Drag and Relate iView there if these are unchecked.
You can also open this Drag and Relate iView to check its properties.
Thanks,
Vamshi

New implementation scenario.

Scenario: I have the following issue at hand and want to check if there is an existing/alternative solution before implementing my own.
I want to create a QBC taxonomy. I want to classify docuents, based on the value assigned to a custom property for the documents.
I believe following are the steps:
1- create property
2- create classification index
3- create taxonomy and categories within
4- create query condition for each category
5- assign values to the property for each document
6- define KM Navigation iView that display categories
Now I'm on step5. I want to assign values to a lot of documents. But instead of manually doing it, I want to create a web application that takes the following input values: repository path; a property name; a value.
Please let me know if there are alternate ways to achieve the same.
Also, if you already have a solution and won't mind sharing it, I would be more than happy to use you codebase: [email protected]
Best Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumaran,
You can do that automatically, but you must develop it using SAP Developer Studio. There is not other alternative.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/kmc/knowledge management and collaboration developers guide.html
Patricio.

Problem in Extended Classic Scenario related to PO

hi,
we are using Extended classic scenario in our client. User has created a SC .when we are going to create a PO system is showing an error Purchase Group B01 does not exist.
This Purchase group is not created in R3 or neither replicated to SRM.and it is not assigned in the Org structure.
Kindly Let me know from where the purchase Group might be Picked apart from the org Structure.
regards
subhash

Hi
Can you check your SC how this Purchase group picked form your basic data ?
since this purchase group is existing in srm thats why it picked while create sc right?
regards
Muthu

Implementation scenarios relating to SD

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for