New Quoting System breaks HTML

The new "email" style of quoting, in addition to being harder to read, breaks some HTML. Here's an example from this topic.
Original:
Matt, this section is for questions specifically about the new Discussions. You should repost your question here, and you'll get more answers.
Quoted:
> Matt, this section is for questions specifically
about the new Discussions. You should repost your
question
href="http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=
755">here, and you'll get more answers.

Sidney,
even though it is not as easy to use, you should be able to use HTML tags for "proper" quoting:
Matt, this section is for questions specifically about the new Discussions. You should repost your question here, and you'll get more answers.
(The above was achieved by copy/pasting the text from the "Replying To:" text below the new message text view and wrapping it between <blockquote> and </blockquote> tags.
I very much agree that the previews way of simply pre-pending a > at the beginning of a line was much simpler and made more sense...
Andreas

Similar Messages

Will the new Open Platform allow for a php like quote system to function within a bc site?

I'm currently running a website that is built in wordpress, and uses a quote system built in php to fetch data based on the questions the person fills out from an online form.
I'm interested in moving this site over to BC, I tried to in the past, but I discovered prior to Open Platform, this type of quote system would not be very possible, so we stuck with wp for its ability to leverage php integration.
With the current site we upload an excel sheet as well as company logos that correspond to the there prices. The excel has all the prices layed out, its just a matter of the php fetching the info and provided quotes to the person.
Below is a rough example A and B of what currently shows(roughed out images to respect the companies). My question to the gurus of BC, now with Open Platform, will we be able to effectively recreate this same set up, and if so, perhaps there is a developer that would be interested, in working with me on this, and if it could be achieved in the language that OP is using. I hope my query makes a little sense. Best - Erik
Example A. Form.
Example B. Quote Rates based on selections

Hi createmint,
It is possible to integrate 3rd party code (including php) if you can host the php on your own. Below is how I think you can achieve this:
1. Host your php quotation system on an accessible web server.
2. Register an application from BC partner portal.
3. In your menu.json you point the default entry to your external site:
    "menu-meet_the_team": {
        "weight": 10000,
        "title": "Quotation system",
        "attr" : {
            "href" : "http://www.myquotationsystem.com/oauth/bc_cb.php"
4. At this step you will have an entry in menu.json which will point to http://www.myquotationsystem.com/oauth/bc_cb.php php script (this is your start page of the application). At this point your quotation system is integrated in BC admin console. Moreover, the php callback receives an access token into hash fragment which can be used to call BC APIs.
5. You would probably need to change your quotation system a little bit in order to create some frontend pages which display your app frontend to users.
Of course, I totally agree with Liam that you should try to migrate your app to web apps but maybe the solution presented above will do the trick for short term.
Regards,
Radu

Old message quoting system.

Greetings all, Ever since skype 7.0 went live I've been having massive trouble properly quoting old messages, especially multiple ones between myself and someone else in a conversation. Back in the old days, ALL quoted messages used a simple and effective date and time stamp which worked great: [7/20/2015 3:54PM] Person: This is a message. With new skype however, quoted messages try to align themselves to the current day: "This is a message."Person, Yesterday, 3:54PM In conversations, most of the time the first message doesn't even get ANY sort of identifier, and following messages only get a timestamp and no date: Hello[6:08PM] Person: Hi[6:08PM] Person2: How are you?[6:08PM] Person: I'm doing okay. Furthermore when I try to quote a message where I reply to someone, it doesn't even identify them anymore, it just puts their quote after my name and squishes my reply onto it: [6:12PM] Person2: I'm doing okay.I'm glad to hear that This makes it a nightmare for me to try and archive skype conversations to text file for posterity. Does anyone know how to get back the old skype time/date stamp quoting system? Thank you for reading.

Hi Pablo,
You can use the Part below with an FXS port and it has an RCA connector output for connection to the Amp. This TAM-B is required in 99% of the cases I have seen.
Something like this;
http://www.camelectronics.com/botateacmo.html
Hope this helps!
Rob

I currently have the Mac OS X v10.5.8 and want to get the new operating system but I don't know how to do it. I don't have the Mac App Store and can't get it because of my version. What do I do?

I currently have the Mac OS X v10.5.8 and want to get the new operating system but I don't know how to do it. I don't have the Mac App Store and can't get it because of my version. What do I do?

The Early 2006 model 1,1 Core Duo can only run a maximum of 10.6 Snow Leopard. The models Late 2006 Core 2 Duos 2,1 through Early 2008 4,1 can only run a maximum of 10.7 Lion. The Late 2008 model 5,1 Aluminum Unibody through the Mid 2010 White Unibody model 7,1 can run 10.8 Mountain Lion.
To see which model you have go to the Apple in the upper left corner and select About This Mac, then click on More Info. When System Profiler comes up check the Model Identifier and post it back here.
The Snow Leopard 10.6 DVD should still be available from Apple for $20. You will have to call Apple Customer Care 1-800-692-7753 or 1-800-676-2775 to purchase it. It may still be in the Legacy Products list.
If they no longer have any in stock you will have to buy it from eBay or Apple resellers that still have stock. But you will have to pay a premium since the DVDs are no longer being made. Snow Leopard DVDs are already up to $100 on Amazon.
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=10.6+snow+leopard&_sacat=0&_odkw=mac+os+10.6 &_osacat=0
Once you are at 10.6.8 Lion is still available from Apple. You will have to call Apple Customer Care 1-800-692-7753 or 1-800-676-2775. to purchase it. Then within 3 days you will get an email with a code which you can use to download Lion from the App Store. The price is still $29. You must have at least a model 2,1 MacBook.
Lion will require at least 2gb of RAM but really needs 4gb to run smoothly.
As for third party programs see this list for compatibility with 10.7 http://roaringapps.com/apps:table
Also Lion doesn't run any Power PC programs. To see if you have any Power PC programs go to the Apple in the upper left corner and select About This Mac, then click on More Info. When System Profiler comes up select Applications under Software. Then look under Kind to see if any of your applications are listed as Power PC. Universal and Intel will run under Lion.
Before Mac switched to Intel processors in 2006 they used Power PC processors from 1994 to 2005. Power PC 601 through 604, G3, G4 and G5. Applications written for the Power PC processors need the application called Rosetta to run on Intel processors. This was part of the Operating System in 10.4 and 10.5 but was an optional install in 10.6. With 10.7 Lion Apple dropped all support for Power PC applications.

RFC: a new init system for Arch

hi guys, i've been thinking about this for a while, especially since after seeing what a real optimized init system can do for a distro (ala Annvix). Recently, somebody also suggested the use of upstart (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 59#p238859), and i've been thinking that perhaps it's time to put forth this suggestion to the community, and get the devs in on this (discussion) as well.
What do u guys think of replacing and moving from the current BSD-init style (it's great, but there's more stuff out there!!!) to a better, "totally optimized", "rad" (excuse the slang, also known as "awesome") init system?
Here are my thoughts for the 2 that i've investigated...
1. Upstart (http://upstart.ubuntu.com/index.html)
Advantages:
- active, maintained code
- the idea of "events" is natural, intuitive, and as a model, fits the real world situation ("optimizing for the bootup process") very nicely
(although one could also argue that u could just as well call your events "dependencies" ala initng, if u dig deeper, u'll see that it's more than just that)
Disadvantages:
- looks set to become much more than just a simple 'init' replacement (see for eg., http://upstart.ubuntu.com/wiki/ComplexEventConfig [via https://launchpad.net/upstart from "Latest proposed features" section]), and violate the KISS principle of Arch??? (or is this still considered "simple enough"???):
-> looks set to replace cron, atd, and anacron, .... (http://upstart.ubuntu.com/faq.html#replace-cron)
-> looks set to almost (or could potentially become) a "total event system for Linux" (see the last 3 questions of the faq)
2. Runit (http://smarden.org/runit/)
Advantages:
- fits the KISS idea most definitely
- can be integrated very nicely with its 'supervise-like' replacements to help supervise ur services
- if u're a djb fan, u'll find urself going "woohoo!!!" You'll get the very same advantages that u get with djb's supervise system...
Disadvantages:
- if u're not a djb fan, u'll find urself going ....
Your comments and ideas, folks?

I don't see how complexity gonna improve on that.
It won't. In fact it'll actually make it slower, more than likely. People refuse to understand this.
If ask me, being able to just list your daemons in any order and have them work (and load in the proper order as quickly as possible) without having to look-up what each damon might possibly require (and keep track of changes in those requirements with new versions) follows KISS a lot more than having to deal with it all to order your daemons list (and lossing the option to background daemons that are required for other ones).
Perhaps you don't understand the shade of meaning that Arch uses when it says "Simple". Simple does NOT mean that something is "easy", it means it isn't complicated and over-complex. Ever heard of DOS's autoexec.bat? It was a stinkin' batch file and it ran everything you typed into it in the order you typed into it. The reason why I mention this is not because I want to adopt DOS's init system, but instead because I wanted to show you the pinnacle of simplicity. Was it easy to use? Most of the time. But DOS also had issues of TSR's and services, etc. that depend on other services. I'd like for you to point out a simpler system than autoexec.bat that is actually in mainstream use. See? Simple does NOT equal easy.
However, I'd like to mention what my Jr. High principal always told us: "Anything is easy if you know how to do it." I actually find Arch's init system to be the EASIEST system out there. I know EXACTLY what it is doing at all times. I tried to grok Ubuntu's system and I found myself having to read a bunch of stuff from different sources to make sense of it. Is that easy? No. Not for me. Simple IS easy if you throw out your Windows conditioning that everything should be done for you and that you can't think for yourself. You say we should be able to make a list of services and they should all start in the order Arch thinks they should. I on the other hand say that if I want x to start before y, then x BETTER start before y. You see, I'M the user. I'm not just there to share the experience. My computer is a tool and I want it to do exactly what I say.
Hell, I bet you spent more time writing this post than a new init system will save you in your lifetime. The Linux kernel takes longer to start on my machine than anything else (and I'm connected via WiFi on a buggy and slow as hell driver and through DHCP on top of that). I already said one thing that may give you a little boost, which is caching (which may actually slow you down due to overhead). You can also try suspending to disk (aka hibernating) instead of just shutting down.
What do u guys think of replacing and moving from the current BSD-init style (it's great, but there's more stuff out there!!!) to a better, "totally optimized", "rad" (excuse the slang, also known as "awesome") init system?
Explain to me everything you know about the BSD init style. I'm curious.
Last edited by deficite (2007-04-05 02:51:51)

Can we add new logical system in Entitlement tab in SAP Authentication.

Hi ,
We already Installed and configured sap integration kit and every thing works fine. My question is as of now we connected our sap BW Dev system to BOBJ but we would like to connect to BW Prod System to same BOBJ System. What are the steps we need to follow to do this.
Can we just add the new logical system in entitlement tab of sap authentication in BOBJ 3.1? and import the roles and login to BOBJ USING THE Newly added SYSTEM Credentials. Thanks in Advance.
Thanks,
SK.

Hi Ingo,
Thanks for the information.
Are there any specific steps you need to follow when you are adding one more system to sap authentication. can you please give the steps we need to follow to setup this in right way. Thanks in advance.
Is there any thing we need to configure on sap side other than sap logon ticket parametre. If you can please provide the steps it will be great. Thankyou very much In advance.
Thanks,
SK.
Edited by: Vallabhaneni SK on Jul 14, 2009 8:53 AM

Why does the new operating system not delete the moved files from their original location - it seems like an enormous waste of space, time and effort to clean up every file once you've moved it

Why does the new operating system not delete the moved files from their original locations - it seems like an enormous waste of space, time and effort to clean up every file once you've moved it - also, when transferring large amounts of files it becomes a very large problem remembering which files were transferred and which not.

You're going to need to be more specific, as I'm not quite sure I understand what you're talking about.
If you're referring to copying from an external hard drive or flash drive, and you want to actually move files rather than copy them, you can hold down the option key to force it to do a "move" rather than a "copy." This is not new behavior, though... the Mac OS has worked this way as long as I can recall (and I've been using it since 1984).
If you're having a problem with trying to move files from one place to another on a single drive causing them to be copied instead, that is likely because of some permissions issue preventing you from actually being able to move them.

2504 with new-architecture enabled breaks MAC auth for guest access

Hello,
We have (2) 2504 WLC running version 7.6.120. WLC1 is the local controller and WLC2 is an achor controller for guest-access. We need to incorporate a 3850 for use with the WLC2 anchor. The guest access is currently working with Mac-Auth and Mac-Auth-Fail to Web-Auth.
When converged access is enabled on the WLC1 and WLC2, the MAc-Auth no longer works. That is, the previously authenticated user is now redirected to the Web-Auth page. The local controller shows the user as authenticated but the Anchor controller shows the state as WEb-Auth-REQD.
Rolling back using "config mobility new-architecture disable" and rebooting resolves the issue.
Does anyone what changes from the old to the new that would break this mac-auth/web-auth configuration?

You should reach TAC for these sort of issues. Not many people deploying this CA setup yet & you may not get direct feedback immediately.
HTH
Rasika

New Development System

Hi, just wanted to bounce some ideas off you guys.
We are about to create a new ECC 6 system initially a sandbox system for blue print then a Dev system.
My organisation as a global finance SAP template that we will use. So the steps would be a fresh install, then install the global finace templete, not sure how but will probably a system copy.
We also have another stream of work being undertaken in another part of the organisation which is all being done in its own landscape. We need to split out some of this functionality to use on our system (about 2000 transports).
I don't want to copy all of this work over to the Dev system probably from their QA system as it has a load of master / transaction data, but it will give everything we require OK we would need to some clean up work.
The other option would be to selct the transports that we require and apply them, sequencing will be a issue,
Ideally I guess the best solution is for all the work to be performed again in the new Dev system
Its a tricky one, I need the fucntionality but want to keep the system as clean as possible. The QA system will be built on the transports from Dev.
Any thoughts appreciated,
Thanks

Ideally I guess the best solution is for all the work to be performed again in the new Dev system
You will be right on this. Problem w/ a "easy" solution via transport is that you may run into cross development with the same object fighting eachother. This could result in unexpected behavior in the system, which would turn into a diagnostics nightmare.
We are currently in middle of upgrading to ECC 6.0. The plan here inhouse is to actually freeze all modifications for period of 1 quarter, allowing only production fixes only. This would minimize the number of transports that we have to manually consolidate.

New Development system copy from Production

Hi All,
Hope you can help me out here with some ideas.
We are currently planning to implement a new SAP BW Development system, and for this we would like to make it a 1:1 copy of our current production system. Meaning all from customizing, ABAP, workbench objects etc.
But what we do not want is all the transaction and master data in infoobject, cubes etc., we are only interested in the structure and objects. Therefore we can rule out "System copy".
My question is then, is there any other ways to do this when system copy is a no go? I know we can do client copy but then we will not get all the workbench / ABAP programs which we need.
Any ideas on how to do this?
Thx. in Advance

Hi Rasmus,
But what we do not want is all the transaction and master data in infoobject, cubes etc., we are only interested in the structure and objects. Therefore we can rule out "System copy".
Options 1: As BI objects are cross client , copying client will not solve your purpose 100%.
You can perform system copy and then clean up data in DEV
Option 2: You can create a new Development and then create TRs for required configuration objects and move to new development system.
Option 3: Use SLO tools to perform container copy without any data.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

Business Event Appraisal Form in New Appraisal System

Hi,
I have created Business Event Appraisal Form in New Appraisal System. I have done Appraisals for one Business Event by an attendee.
Where can see this Appraisal Document of Business Event and do any change if required. Or from we can delete this documents of Business Event Appraisal.
I have tried tcode appchange but there only Personnel Appraisal templates are visible.
Samriddhi

Hi,
If you are using a template created by using the Objective Setting and Appraisals componet you can view and maintain forms filled in by employees via Transaction phap_admin_pa.
Br,
Art

How can I restore my iPhone 3Gs after I tried to update to the new operating system.

I tried to upgrade my 3Gs to the new operating system(IOS5) and I got some kind of unknown error. I told iTunes to do the back up before doing the upgrade. The phone is stuck in restore mode with the "connect to iTunes" logo displayed.
I have the latest version of iTunes on my computer. I've restarted my computer. The iTunes doesnt seem to see the iPhone, but when I connect the phone to the computer I hear the recognition jingle by the comoputer, the one you hear when when a piece of equipment is connected to the computer. In addition, when i look at "my computer" I dont see the iPhone in the selections of items connected to the computer.
I have tried all the reset proceducures with turning the phone off and using the home key.
Does anybody have any suggestions?

Hi,
See Here for
Unable to Update or Restore
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1808

HT4623 I have a Gen 4 Ipod Touch, it is still running with IOS 4. When i go to my settings and select General there is no Software Update button to choose from. How do i update my Ipod to the new IOS system?

I have a Gen 4 Ipod Touch, it is still running with IOS 4. When i go to my settings and select <General> there is no <Software Update> button to choose from. How do i update my Ipod to the new IOS system?

You have to hook it up to a computer and update it to ios 5 and then there will be a "software update" button.

How can I update my ipad 2 to the new OS system when I can't find the software

how can I update my ipad 2 with the new operating system? I am in 4.3.5 version

iOS- How to update your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch

Can I use my new iphone 5 with the old iHome iD9SVC Speaker System if I get an apadter? or should i just buy new speaker system made specifically for the iphone5

can I use my new iphone 5 with my old iHome iD9SVC speaker system if I get an adapter? or should i just buy a new speaker system made specifically for the iphone 5?

Look iTunes>Preferences>Devices...is a backup listed for your iPhone 5 dated BEFORE you restored your iPhone 4 backup to your iPhone 5? If not, your data is gone. If there is a backup, on your iPhone 5: Settings>General>Reset>Erase All Content & Settings. You should now be able to restore that backup, if it exists, to your iPhone 5.

New Quoting System breaks HTML

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for