No, it's NOT A ZOOM.... 8520 and other Blackberrys DO NOT ZOOM - do they?

Mine is an 8520.
I've had this problem where if I zoom in at all, I don't get a zoomed photo, I get a cropped photo of the original picture.
This isn't zoom - it is cropping.
So I have seen THREE other BBs: one is an 8520, one is a Bold and one is a slider BB. But they all do the same thing - not zooming, but cropping.
Even the guy in the shop couldn't believe his eyes that his expensive phone when zooming, back the kb of the file LESS. He said "it would be the same, same pixels, just closer to the object".
So - research: can anyone who reads this please use their Blackberry, take a photo, and Send by Email: make a note of the pixel size (or check properties. Then do it again, but zoomed ALL THE WAY IN.
Report back to this post, your model, and the two file sizes. If they are THE SAME, then you do not have the problem. If they differ, you have a FAULT, and Blackberry's term "zoom" is wholely inaccurate.
Please let me know, any of you. Thanks in advance.

Let's get to the bottom of this staum607. Do you share your Apple ID with anyone else? Are these problems restricted to iPhone to iPhone calls? If neither applies, please go to Settings>General>Reset>Reset Network Settings only. Then, test calls again.
AdaS_VZW
Follow us on Twitter at @VZWSupport

Similar Messages

Skype for 8520 and other BB version's / Question needed to be answered by Blackberry support for everyone!

This is a question that seriously needs answering for myself and other BB customer's.
Personally the only reason I have a BB is because I can have window's live messenger on it, But WLM is closing in April and updating to skype, Meaning everyone who use's WLM that their contact's will be going there and not to any other network!
Now I've read from what I've researched that BB maybe will be joining with oovoo something like that, Why when that is not where people's MSN/Hotmail contact's will be going ?
BB paying customer's to BB product's want access to there MSN/Hotmail contact's not to be diverted to another service that does not have their MSN/Hotmail contact's.
Also I have seen that skype or something along those line's will be available for the new BB 10, So what about earlier product's such as BB curve 8520 that I personally own myself that has nothing wrong with it?
So us paying BB customer's are going to be excluded because we don't have a brand new version of BB due to there being nothing wrong with the BB's we have? Which so were going to be penalized?
I would like these question's answered please because I am not happy about this and I'm sure a lot of other BB customer's are not too, It's not anyone's fault that WLM is going to be taken away but atleast make sure that BB customer's have a skype app to access their MSN/Hotmail contact's and can conversant with them directly like WLM.
Honestly I love my BB and wouldn't be without it purely because I'm able to log in WLM when I like, Where ever I am and talk to my contact's directly, Not all people have BB's and can not be added to BB messenger which is why WLM is a priority on BB app's for BB customer's, Is something going to be done about this? Because if not then that is just wrong which will result in many valued BB customer's changing to other phone's purely because out of being penalized of not having the newer version of BB 10 or not having skype at all regardless of IM+, We should have a direct Skype app and be able to have direct gain to our MSN/Hotmail contact's like we did on WLM.
So can someone answer this please and give us BB customer's confirmation on what is going to happen, Thank you.
For those of you BB customer's who are reading this who use WLM and is important to you as it is myself, Like this thread please so it get's noticed so that action will be taken. Thank you.

The answer is actually simple...example...6.0.0.415 for a 9860 is very different from 6.0.0.415 for a 9670. Hence, the app developers must port their apps to every combination of (usually) major OS level (e.g., 6.0, 7.0, 7.1) and specific device model number. That's a lot of combinations to which they must port their app...and many choose to not do them all. But the choice is the app developers.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Ebay and other sites dont display normally as they were

hello--im a guy with a Firefox webpage display problem.....Firefox doesn't display web pages the same as my opera and chrome browsers do now....after 27.0 upgrade i think is problem maybe...but my eBay auction pages are different ...they have 3 drop down box areas when normally a week ago they weren't there...for seller location item number return policy etc...normally they should all be presented there in the open..but Firefox no longer does this...my eBay page display of lists is different too now....i had to uncheck now not letting way website chooses to display itself ..i manually had to set text size etc eBay was all messed up.....coast to coast am doesn't present right either on Firefox compared to opera and chrome which show it normally....i tried putting the eBay auctions and my eBay page on the http://validator.w3.org site you recommend..it shows 300 errors and 50 warning for the eBay auction page as HTML 5 it says..my eBay page had 50 errors and 30 warnings...i have no idea what all that is im not a programmer code writer or hacker.....myself i think these are major websites and they do display properly in other major browsers....so i feel Mozilla Firefox is at fault and has bug issues...can you contact Mozilla technical support please..i have no way of knowing any support emails or technical support phone numbers ..just these last hope support forums which aren't much help to me....

Hello,
Many site issues can be caused by corrupt cookies or cache. In order to try to fix these problems, the first step is to clear both cookies and the cache.
Note: ''This will temporarily log you out of all sites you're logged in to.''
To clear cache and cookies do the following:
#Go to Firefox > History > Clear recent history or (if no Firefox button is shown) go to Tools > Clear recent history.
#Under "Time range to clear", select "Everything".
#Now, click the arrow next to Details to toggle the Details list active.
#From the details list, check ''Cache'' and ''Cookies'' and uncheck everything else.
#Now click the ''Clear now'' button.
Further information can be found in the [[Clear your cache, history and other personal information in Firefox]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!
Thank you.

Tentative bug report: property node (and other objects) resizes structure in which they are dropped even when this is not needed

This one has bugged me for a while, so, since I am in a mood to report annoying features, here it is:
On the diagram, when you drop an object that could have its size increased by user action (for instance a property node in which you chose "Value", which is a short property, but you could later change this to a "longer" one, which admittedly might require more space on the diagram), a case structure in which you drop it, will automatically increase its size.
Let me illustrate this with ONE example (can be reproduced with other objects such as enums, clusters, etc...).
Here is a simple diagram:
Note that I am going to create a property node from the front panel. This, for a reason that makes the beauty of this "feature", is very important. Apparently, if you create the property node from the diagram, nothing weird happens. The exact location where I will drop the node is not very important but needs to be close enough from the border.
Here is the result (LV 2011 but as I said, this has bugged me for a few versions already):
Basically, the case structure (and the whole diagram as a matter of fact) has expanded.
This is particularly annoying, say, when you are creating a diagram with 10 cases in a case structure and you start dropping things such as property nodes in each case: the structure keeps growing, and growing, and growing...
That also works with Event structure, and I am ready to bet, with other as well.
As I said, it is also not limited to Property nodes. I have noticed that this happens if you drop a cluster constant that contains an enum (presumably because some of the enumerated strings are longer than others).
I could speculate why this is the case, but that is not my job.

Actually, this might not be true. I found a variant of this behavior. With "Place Structure with Auto Grow enabled" unchecked, here is what I observed while dropping a property node on my diagram:
Before:
After:
This is the expected behavior. The Property Node is partly hidden inside the Case Structure I dropped it in. Now that's not what I wanted to do. I wanted to drop it in in the innermost Case Structure:
The problem is that now this Structure has grown (as has the whole diagram) to leave space for the whole Property Node:
It is a subtle bug in the sense that I tried to reproduce it on a new VI with a series of nested Case Structures, but it did not result in this behavior.
Anybody caring to comment?

Audio and other Bugs in 2.0 - are they fixed in 3.0?

I just completed creating an e-learning course using
Captivate 2.0 that used quite a lot of graphics and video. The
numbers of bugs I experienced when publishing to Flash in 2.0 were
so substantial that the delivery date had to be delayed almost two
months, much to the unhappiness of the client. I'll list the most
frustrating problems and hopefully someone can tell me if these
issues were fixed in 3.0. It's difficult for me to justify an
upgrade if I'm going to run into the same horrible problems.
I will start out by stating that I keep my project files
under 20 slides and all the slides have audio. The slides are 800 x
500 and none of the animations/video I'm using are more than 20
secs long. I'm running Captivate 2.0 on a Dell laptop with an Intel
Core 2 Duo, running Windows XP (with all the updates) and with 1 GB
of RAM. I've upped my Virtual Memory to 5 GB. My machine meets all
the specifications listed for Captivate 2.0, but I suspect that one
really needs a much faster machine with a lot more memory to work
at anything other than a snail's pace. I also make sure that no
unused graphics or animations are left in a project's library and I
defrag my hard drive at least once a day (if I don't Captivate
crashes everytime I try and open or save a file).
Problems:
- It takes up to 15 minutes to open or close a file. It
doesn't matter how big the file is. And the more files I open and
close in Captivate in any session, the slower my machine gets and I
evenutally have to restart it. It also takes 10-15 minutes to save
some of my project files, whose sizes have ballooned for no reason
(see below). If Captivate crashes during the save or even right
after a file is saved, the file is corrupted and cannot be opened.
I've had to redo work two or three times because of this problem.
- A project file with 10 multiple choice quiz questions and
two other simple slides (and only one brief audio file) is over 1
GB in size. I can't have more than 10 quiz questions because the
file sizes get so large that the program crashes before I can save
the file. I also have a number of 3-slide projects with graphics,
no animations, and some audio that are over 1 GB in size. But then
I have 20-slide project files with a lot of video and graphics and
audio that never go above 200 MB. In fact, all my project file file
sizes seem enormous for no good reason. And it's not from orphan
files in the Library. It's going to take like 10 DVDs to turn over
all my project files (about 40 project files - all under 20 slides
each) to the client. It's ridiculous!
- If I import audio as a WAV file and then publish the
project to Flash, the audio either moves to different slides or one
audio file gets repeated in all the slides. The only way to fix
this is to convert all the .WAV files to .MP3 files (but at a very
low bit rate), delete all the old WAV files from the project, and
replace them with the MP3 files. Using a WAV file always leads to
major audio scrambling when I publish to Flash.
- If I use a .MP3 audio file with a higher bit rate, when I
publish to Flash, the audio is slowed down by about 50%.
- Graphics fail to show up in the .SWF file after a publish
to Flash. This is entirely random and different graphics are
affected each publish, so I never know what the published file will
look like.The only way to fix this is to go back to the Project
file, double click on the graphic and make a change to one of the
options, save the change, reopen the graphic and change the option
back to the one you started with. Then cross your fingers that
another graphic won't vanish during the Publish process.
- Objects that I have fading in and out on the timeline work
perfectly in the project file, but when they are published as Flash
output, the timings are all off by up to 15 seconds. This happens
on a couple of slides and I can find no explanation or way to fix
this. And it's completely random. One publish may have the timings
out of whack and the next one has the timings correct.
- Adding any animation to a project file causes all drop-down
menus to stop functioning. I see from other posts that I just need
to click on an object in the Library. Wish I had known about that
sooner. I ended up restarting Captivate a lot.
- After closing Captivate, it takes 15 minutes or more before
my machine works at anything like it's normal speed. If I try to
shut down my machine right after closing Captivate, I get an error
message telling me Captivate is still running. It appears that
Captivate does not release memory after it is closed. I have to
restart my machine everytime I close Captivate just so I can
continue working in other applications normally.
These are just the major problems which caused the most
headaches and delays. Most of it seems to be the VERY buggy publish
to Flash option and some problems with releasing memory.
I know a lot of other people have experienced these problems,
as I've read about them in other posts. Has Capitvate 3 fixed any
of these issues? There is no way I'd ever attempt another
e-learining project with Captivate 2. This one about killed me.
Thanks,
Jim

Thanks to everyone who has responded and tried to help.
Unfortunately, none of suggestions have worked.
Here's the update:
- All my files are local, so the business about working on
network drives is not applicable.
- I tried the Save As option to try and decrease my huge file
sizes as suggested by a couple of people. I did a Save As to
another file name, then deleted the original file and did another
Save As from the renamed file back to the original file name. My
file sizes INCREASED each time I saved. I now have a 12 slide
projects file with multiple choice quiz questions, no video,
minimal graphics and audio that tops out over 1.1 GB.
- I can't copy slides from one file to a new file because the
file I want to copy slides from is so large that Captivate crashes
everytime I try to Import slides from another project.
- No one has mentioned anything about all the bizarre, random
things that happen to graphics and audio when you publish to Flash.
This is by far the most frustrating aspects of working with
Captivate 2.0 - there is no telling what will turn up in your .SWF
file and whether the audio will be on the correct slide. I've seen
several posts about the problems using WAV files for audio or about
MP3 files being slowed down in the SWF files but no one can say if
these problems have been fixed in 3.0. Likewise the disappearing
graphics and the inexplicable timeline delays when publishing from
my Project file to an SWF file. And now a new one has popped up: in
the SWF file, the screen size suddenly gets smaller on several
slides, then goes back to normal!
- It sounds like I need a lot more memory and faster machine
(despite Adobe stating that my machine should be adequate to use
Captivate) to deal with the slow performance, constant crashing,
and frequent corrupted files. But this can't possibly explain the
extreme file bloat and all the Publish errors when creating SWF
files.
At this point there's no way I can upgrade to 3.0 because of
all the problems with 2.0. I can't make a justification to my boss
to spend more money on a software program that (from his
perspective and mine) does not work as advertised and has impacted
this project so dramatically.
It sounds like I'm the only Captivate user who is
experiencing these difficulties, which is really perplexing and
bizarre. Perhaps Captivate and Dell laptops are not compatible? I
sure do wish that Captivate had a Mac version. At least there
wouldn't be the usual Windows software excuse of "it must be your
machine."
Sigh... I sure did want to like Captivate, but everytime I
open the program I get the hebbie jebbies, expecting some new
disaster to befall me.
Jim

Plugins; no script, scrapbook, informenter and other fail to start, on reboot they are there FF 17.01 on XP

FF suddenly stopped showing many plugins. Notably, No Script, Informenter, scrapbook, no color and more. I have tried safe mode, no luck. The only thing seems to be a cold restart, then FF has some of my plugins active. BTW ALL of the non-responding plugins are shown in the extensions file and show active. But if I try to reinstall a missing plugin any plugins that were active on restart are gone. Have done AV scans, root kit scans. One other anomaly, the DNS process lost its mind and gave "object is moved to here" error. This is being sent from a W7 machine, NOT the failed one.

Try to boot the computer in Windows Safe mode with network support (press F8 on the boot screen) as a test to see if that helps in case your security software is interfering.
Make sure that Firefox closes properly and that there isn't a hanging Firefox or plugin-container process left in the task manager.
Use "Firefox/File > Exit" (Mac: "Firefox > Quit"; Linux: "File > Quit") to close Firefox if you are currently doing that by clicking the close X on the title bar.
See also:
*"Hang at exit": http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_hangs
*"Firefox hangs when you quit it": https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firefox+hangs

Re: Audio and other Bugs in 2.0 - are they fixed in 3.0?

I've had some issues with Captivate, v1 and 2, but nowhere
near the
degree to what you've described. My sympathies!
It sounds like your CP files were corrupted somehow with that
extent of
problems. Are your project files on a network location? If
so, move them
all local! I develop from a network drive a lot but if
problems ever
start popping up, the first thing I do is move the source to
my local drive.
If I continue having odd problems, I create new Captivate
files by either,
1) opening the current project, copy all slides, close the
project,
create a new project, and paste.
2) create a new project and Import all the (relevant) slides
from the
previous version of the file.
Either of those processes almost always clear up any
anomalous behavior,
except maybe file size bloat...
To deal with file size bloat alone, I've found doing a Save
As..., then
a Save As... again often helps reduce file sizes. How weird
is that...
Not having used CP3 yet, I don't know if any of these issues
have been
addressed. I've found CP2 to open/save/close projects a LOT
quicker than
CP1. I think in your case, if your files are really 1gb, that
can
directly explain the 15 minute opening process.
HTH
Erik
JimAtANI wrote:
> I just completed creating an e-learning course using
Captivate 2.0 that used
> quite a lot of graphics and video. The numbers of bugs I
experienced when
> publishing to Flash in 2.0 were so substantial that the
delivery date had to be
> delayed almost two months, much to the unhappiness of
the client. I'll list the
> most frustrating problems and hopefully someone can tell
me if these issues
> were fixed in 3.0. It's difficult for me to justify an
upgrade if I'm going to
> run into the same horrible problems...
Erik Lord
http://www.capemedia.net
Adobe Community Expert - Authorware
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/
http://www.awaretips.net -
samples, tips, products, faqs, and links!
*Search the A'ware newsgroup archives*
http://groups.google.com/group/macromedia.authorware

I've had some issues with Captivate, v1 and 2, but nowhere
near the
degree to what you've described. My sympathies!
It sounds like your CP files were corrupted somehow with that
extent of
problems. Are your project files on a network location? If
so, move them
all local! I develop from a network drive a lot but if
problems ever
start popping up, the first thing I do is move the source to
my local drive.
If I continue having odd problems, I create new Captivate
files by either,
1) opening the current project, copy all slides, close the
project,
create a new project, and paste.
2) create a new project and Import all the (relevant) slides
from the
previous version of the file.
Either of those processes almost always clear up any
anomalous behavior,
except maybe file size bloat...
To deal with file size bloat alone, I've found doing a Save
As..., then
a Save As... again often helps reduce file sizes. How weird
is that...
Not having used CP3 yet, I don't know if any of these issues
have been
addressed. I've found CP2 to open/save/close projects a LOT
quicker than
CP1. I think in your case, if your files are really 1gb, that
can
directly explain the 15 minute opening process.
HTH
Erik
JimAtANI wrote:
> I just completed creating an e-learning course using
Captivate 2.0 that used
> quite a lot of graphics and video. The numbers of bugs I
experienced when
> publishing to Flash in 2.0 were so substantial that the
delivery date had to be
> delayed almost two months, much to the unhappiness of
the client. I'll list the
> most frustrating problems and hopefully someone can tell
me if these issues
> were fixed in 3.0. It's difficult for me to justify an
upgrade if I'm going to
> run into the same horrible problems...
Erik Lord
http://www.capemedia.net
Adobe Community Expert - Authorware
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/
http://www.awaretips.net -
samples, tips, products, faqs, and links!
*Search the A'ware newsgroup archives*
http://groups.google.com/group/macromedia.authorware

Document files and JPG files larger on sharepoint than they ought to be

Documents that I've uploaded to sharepoint (documents meaning anything that is file.doc / file.docx) seem to be nearly twice as large as they should be in most cases. I'm pretty sure that uploading the document to sharepoint mysteriously adds something along
the lines of 10-15KB on top of what is already there (For smaller, one page documents).
The same problem occurs to a lesser extent with jpg/jpeg files, where the image is marginally larger than it would be on a local hard drive. A 5kb image, for example, might be more like 5.3kb on sharepoint. Normally I would expect some form of compression
to occur, and I would expect to see the filesize shrink a bit. I can't imaging what is causing the filesize to go up this way.
I'm assuming there is some kind of strange versioning or underlying data being added behind the scenes, but I was curious as to why the file sizes are much larger on sharepoint than on a local hard drive.
For reference, I am simply uploading the file programatically by sending the byte array to the file itself. I'm not doing anything complicated, really. Nothing I would expect to cause the file to be larger, at least.
It may also be worth mentioning that I re-downloaded the file and compared it with the original, and other than the random size difference, they are 100% identical.

Zachary,
SharePoint 2013 now leverage SqlServer Shredded Storage technology. As you guess it right, going forward SharePoint will shred its content in multiple pieces to only add delta for next version. Great feature for saving storage.
Lets assume a file is 5 MB. In previous SharePoint (SP) version, all subsequent version of that file will be saved differently. If first version add one extra MB to that file, Then total storage would have been as (5MB + 6MB) in SP 2010, but in SP 2013,
the moment we upload / checkout a file, SP will automatically Shred that 5MB file in 10 Shred(Hypothetically 500KB each). I am certain that while Shredding, it has some basic Shred block size (which can be configured) which multiply by number of shred. And
that might be the reason file size is increase.
When we migrate or upload programmatically, Shred logic dont apply, but the moment you check out - SP will Shred it(As per my knowledge). Please test it.
A good resource : The Truth Behind Shredded Storage By: Jeremy T.
SharePoint 2013 shredded storage with traditional and RBS storage
Good to have some insider validation on this topic!
please 'Propose as answer' if it help you, also vote this as helpful if you like this reply.

I uploaded videos to the premiere, and when I go to edit them they are zoomed in majorly close. What do I do?

I uploaded videos to the premiere, and when I go to edit them they are zoomed in majorly close. What do I do?

It is possible your sequence settings do not match your source material. In the Project Pane, drag one of your source clips to the New Item icon at the bottom right, and release the mouse. That will create a new sequence that matches the properties of the source clip. See if that helps. If so, edit in the new sequence.
MtD

I have some albums that only a few tracks are recognized and others are not. The difference in the info is that the pc recognizes the tracks that say aac matched and not the ones that say aac file. how can I fix that.

I have some albums that only a few tracks are recognized and others are not. The difference in the info is that the pc recognizes the tracks that say aac matched and not the ones that say aac file. how can I fix that. I have tried to creat new file but the message unknown error (-50) pops up. Also these files have played in the past

We usually advice first to Reload web page(s) and bypass the cache in case of such problem and then do a check for extensions to see if any are causing the problem.
* Press and hold Shift and left-click the Reload button.
* Press "Ctrl + F5" or press "Ctrl + Shift + R" (Windows,Linux)
* Press "Cmd + Shift + R" (MAC)
Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
Other possible causes can be zooming a page or having increased the minimum font size.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Websites_look_wrong

My site on mozilla firefox is having many problems ,can not blog,cannot reply to messages, the screen is alot smaller and other issues, please respond.

My site on Mozilla Firefox is having many problems, can not blog, can not reply to messages in inbox , the page is a lot smaller and other problems. Please reply. Thank you

Reset the page zoom on pages that cause problems: View > Zoom > Reset (Ctrl+0 (zero); Cmd+0 on Mac)
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Zoom_text_of_web_pages
Clear the cache and the cookies from sites that cause problems.
"Clear the Cache":
* Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Offline Storage (Cache): "Clear Now"
"Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
* Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode]] to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
*Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
*https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode

My LR 4 suddenly no longer recognized my memory cards. I am using the same cards and cameras but consisitently get the error message:"files not imported because the files could not be read. they are jpg and nef files...I am stuck without my workhorse! Any

My LR 4 suddenly no longer recognized my memory cards. I am using the same cards and cameras but consisitently get the error message:"files not imported because the files could not be read. they are jpg and nef files...I am stuck without my workhorse! Any advice is helpful. This has never happened in 6 years

answered in your other thread LR 4 suddenly no longer recognizes files.

App Store, Pages 5.0, Evernote, and other Apps will not fully function after installing Mavericks. What is the issue and how can this be solved?

Hello all, I could use some serious help on some major issues I have been having after installing Mavericks on my system (specs stated below). Never has a mac felt ever so rebelious and broken before in my lifelong period of using these systems. Anyway, after installing system 10.9, I had opened the mac App Store upon seeing that applications such as my iWork suite all had free updates. However, when I would attempt to navigate to the updates window, it would not respond to my various attempts. I then tried to get there by the system's menu bar and to my dismay, nothing would work when I clicked on it, not even the apple logo menu. I later quit the application using Command-Q and opened up the App Store by the apple menu option 'Software Update...' instead. Though it looked promising since the updates window did open, all update buttons or even '...more' info buttons were unresponsive. These same problems persisted even after restarting my computer. I had also attempted to see if repairing definitions would help by booting from the recovery start-disk and using disk utility but the repairs it carried out apparently had nothing to do with my issue. Finally, I was able to update to the new iWorks suite (which interestingly did not replace the iWorks '09 suite) by following the notification that asked about allowing automatic updates which I did.
Once trying to use Pages 5.0, I soon noticed that all I could do was merely type in a new document and change various options via key commands. Neither the inspector or top bar menus would respond to any place I click. Similarly, Evernote only starts up on the last used note and merely allows me to scroll through it. The top bar menus, the note select pane, and even clicking inside the note to input text are all not functioning and uninfluenced by any mouse clicks.
I have noticed other apps that will not respond to any sort of input, but I still have not explored all applications to know what the issues of each may be. However there are some applications that work such as Safari, Google Chrome, dolphin, iWork '09 including Pages '09, and others.
I do hope that I can avoid rolling back my system, but in the meantime, it has been quite the obticle course to use my computer for all of my school purposes.
Any help is very much appreciated,
Thank you!
DT
MacBook Pro 13-inch, Mid 2009
Processor 2.26 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
Memory 4 GB 1067 MHz DDR3
Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 9400M 256 MB

I also forgot to note that this problem also persists with the new iBooks application. I cannot get past the 'Get Started' screen or access the iBooks Store. Again, all top bar menus are unresponsive.
DT

How do I know if I have the new iPad or the iPad 2. I bought it today but chose not to get the cellular version of the new iPad and now am unsure of which one they have given me. I know I was charged for the new one

I bought what I think to be the new iPad but chose to go with the non cellular option. Now I'm not sure if they have given me the new iPad or the iPad 2. I got a black 64gb one and need an easy way to determine the differences. I haven't put iOS 6 on it.

Look at the Model number in the very small text on the back and compare it to this:
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/ipad/index-ipad-specs.html

(ios5 ipad bugs)I can't get changes of album art, artist, album and other tags to show up in the iPad music player, but they show up correctly in the iTunes device view. Certain random songs do not sync correctly. Wifi sync hasn't worked yet.

(ios5 ipad bugs)I can't get changes of album art, artist, album and other tags to show up in the iPad music player, but they show up correctly in the iTunes device view. Certain random songs do not sync correctly. Wifi sync hasn't worked yet.
I mostly use technology for education and professional audiovisuals and lights.
I don't sync music because I use music from at least 4 different computers. (manually mange music)
I use my iPad to play performance tracks for church and a local gospel group out of our church, Won4Christ.
I chose to buy the iPad because the laptop of one of the group members (dellxps running iTunes) was randomly losing and mixing up music and I wanted a more stable option that was bigger than my iPod touch.
I tried to add some data to music libraries that I previously added to my iPad, but the data only shows up when looking at the device in iTunes.
Wifi sync has not worked on either my laptop or desktop ( both running windows 7 enterprise 64 and newest iTunes) not really a big issue, but very annoying
When browsing through library playlist albums on the iPad, random artwork shows up on playlists with no artwork that you touch while dragging, and it does not go away until you change to another navigation tab and back.
Random songs out of hundreds that I added showed up in iTunes grayed out with a sync circle beside them. Those songs would play back okay on the iPad but were unplayable through the iTunes device view. I had to delete the songs manually through the library along with the playlist and add them again.
These seem to be major stability bugs in the "new" music app and iTunes. My only option right now seems to be to delete the songs that I want to change and re-add them with the changes already applied rather than changing the id3 tags and artwork on the existing music. I hope apple will release updates to resolve these issues.
Thank you for actually making it to the end of this manuscript of annoyances.

Just wondered if anyone had any other suggestions.

No, it's NOT A ZOOM.... 8520 and other Blackberrys DO NOT ZOOM - do they?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for