No Records When Query Using Synonym

Hello
I have a view called v_employees in schema scott and select grant is provided to schema tom in same database.
When I run a sql query from schema scott I could see records as results.
I have a created a synonym in schema tom
CREATE SYNONYM EMPLOYEES FOR scott.v_employees.When I run .select * from EMPLOYEES. from schema tom, I cannot see any results.
What could be the reason for this?

jeneesh wrote:
Please post the query of the view..
select text
from dba_views
where view_name = 'V_EMPLOYEES'
and owner = 'SCOTT';
This return
select * from v_dept d, v_emp emp e
where d.emp_no = e.empnoI have given grant select on all underlying objects to user tom, but not able to see any results.
Cannot create public synonym for this user.
Regards

Similar Messages

Can't save record when I use formulas

I am using Forms Version 6.0.8.11.3.
I have a data block related to a table of my database, and two of the fields are calculated using a formula, for example, the formula that calculates the value of :datablock.field3 is:
nvl(:datablock.field1,0) + nvl(:datablock.field2,0).
The problem is that when I use the procedure commit_form or press the button of commit_form and I am using a formula the changes are not saved, and when I calculate the value of the field3 by not using a formula (I write the code that calculates the value in the when-validate-item trigger of field1 and field2), the changes are saved. So the use of formulas is a kind of Joke from the people of Oracle or something like that, or am I doing something wrong?

That is a good point, but I am not the designer.
So Forms doesn't permit to save calculated fields of the same table by using formulas to avoid redundant data?

Cursor Jumping to last record when query mode for Multi-record block.

I have a multi-record block. the seq field has this validation to check that there should not be a gap
in sequence for S_type and cer_dl field.The program unit is as below.
PROCEDURE seq_validation IS
--Validation to check that there is no gaps in sequence for S_TYPE and cer_dl fields
l_value_to_check varchar2(100);
l_seq_found number;
l_curr_sequence number;
l_new_value varchar2(100);
l_found boolean:=FALSE;
l_new_set boolean := FALSE; --s_type and cer_dl are different from previous set.
begin
if trim(:b1.s_type) is not null
or trim(:b1.cer_dl) is not null
then
-- Program continues here only if all the items are not null
-- Get information from record that needs to be validated
l_value_to_check := trim(:b1.s_type) || ':'|| trim(:b1.cer_dl) ;
l_curr_sequence := :sequence;
if :SYSTEM.CURSOR_RECORD = '1' then
---to check sequence is entered as 1 in the first record
message('Error:Sequence should start with 1');
raise form_trigger_failure;
end if;
go_item('b1.XYZ');
else
FIRST_RECORD;
while :SYSTEM.LAST_RECORD != 'TRUE'
loop
l_found := FALSE;
l_new_value := trim(:b1.S_type) || ':'|| trim(:cer_dl) ;
if l_new_value = l_value_to_check then --
l_new_set:= FALSE;
l_seq_found := :seq;
if l_seq_found >= l_curr_sequence then
go_item('b1.seq');
l_new_set := FALSE;
elsif l_seq_found < l_curr_sequence - 1 then
go_item('b1.sequence');
l_found := FALSE;
elsif l_seq_found = l_curr_sequence - 1 then
l_found:= TRUE;
go_item('b1.xyz); --go to next item
end if;
else
l_new_set := TRUE;
end if;
NEXT_RECORD;
end loop;
if l_new_set then
go_item('b1.xyz'); -- go to next item
else
if not l_found then
message('Error:Sequence should be in order.');
go_item('b1.seq');
raise form_trigger_failure;
end if;
end if;
go_item('b1.xyz'); ---go to next item
end if;
end if;
end;
In the insert mode its working fine(unless you gurus feel to change to make it more perfect.
When I say enter-query and put 'IAS' in the s_type field and then do a execute query it brings all the records of 'IAS'.
Now as I want to update the records, and when I navigate across field(s_type,cer_dl,Seq,xyz) using tab and move the cursor down on second
record(IAS N 2 N), what happens is when I navigate to sequence field the cursor jumps to LAST RECORD( IAS Y 3 N ) of LAST field XYZ.
I am putting the sample record
s_type cer_dl seq xyz
IAS N 1 N
IAS N 2 N
IAS N 3 N
IAS N 4 N
IAS Y 1 N
IAS Y 2 N
IAS Y 3 N
The cursor moves to last record --IAS -Y -3-N when I tab across the second record.

When I say enter-query and put 'IAS' in the s_type field...For your validation to work you must not allow users to enter records in the middle of a block, clear records from the block or query specific records. If you allow the users to enter a query then you are allowing 2 of the rules to be broken.

How to get the index of the error record when uploaded using standard LSMW

Hi Experts,
When uploading data using lsmw standard batch input method which creates an error session if any errors,how can we able to find the index of the error record
eg: If 3rd record in input file is incorrect then error session is getting created with the error and index as 1.But I want to know that 3rd record in my input file is incorrect.
Please help me out.

Srinivas,
In global data, i've written like this.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TYPE_ERROR,
             INDEX TYPE I,
             END OF TYPE_ERROR.
DATA: GT_ERROR TYPE TABLE OF TYPE_ERROR,
           GS_ERROR TYPE TYPE_ERROR,
           GV_TOTAL_COUNT TYPE I, GV_INDEX TYPE I,
           GV_STRING TYPE STRING,
          GV_FILE TYPE STRING VALUE '/usr/sap/interfaces/LSMW/Asseterror
In Begin of transaction,
GV_TOTAL_COUNT = GV_TOTAL_COUNT + 1.
In End of processing,
OPEN DATASET GV_FILE FOR OUTPUT IN TEXT MODE ENCODING DEFAULT.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
CLEAR GS_ERROR.
LOOP AT GT_ERROR INTO GS_ERROR.
CONCATENATE 'INDEX OF THE ERROR RECORD IS:' GS_ERROR INTO GV_STRING.
TRANSFER GV_STRING TO GV_FILE.
CLEAR: GV_STRING, GS_ERROR.
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
How and where will I be assigning error count and append it to the internal table.
Please help me out.

Duplicate Entries in Flashback Table when queried using as of timestamp

Hi All,
Oracle Version : Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition 11.1.0.7
OS: HP-UX PA-RISC (64-bit)
We have a table name DIRECTORY_LISTING_GROUP with HEADER_KEY as primary key.
So when i query like this
SELECT * FROM DIRECTORY_LISTING_GROUP AS OF TIMESTAMP TO_TIMESTAMP('05-NOV-12 10:00:00','DD-MON-YY HH24:MI:SS') WHERE HEADER_KEY=#
Ideally i should get only one row but i m getting two rows which are exactly the same.
Please advice

Peter vd Zwan wrote:
Hi,
Maybe it is a primary key now but are you sure it was a primary key at 05-NOV-12 10:00:00 ?If it was not primary key at 05-NOV-12 10:00:00, and now it is,
which implies primary key constraint was added using ALTER TABLE command.
But using ALTER TABLE command would invalidate the undo data for that table. And using the flashback query would generate exception something like "table definition has changed".

Bookmark shows Variable Screen when Query use a Prequery

Hi Guys,
i have a Problem. I have a Query which use a Prequery. i can execute the Query on Web and save this by Bookmark. If i open the Bookmark the Variablescreen was displayed. Usually when i open a query without prequery and save the bookmark the query result was displayed.
Has anyone an Idea or solution for this problem?
Thx.

Hi Steffi,
Did you resolve the problem with the bookmark and the variable screen? I saw the same problem on a 3.5 system but cannot reproduce the problem on a 7.0 system. On which system did you see the problem? Did you solve it and how?
Regards
Sebastian

How to convert LongRaw to String when querying using DB Adapter?

Hi All,
How do we use a DB Adapter to query on LONG Raw data? Is there a way to implicitly convert data to a string before returning the resultSet?
JDev: 11.1.1.4
Regards.

Hi,
LONG RAW data will be retrieved as base64binary, you can use and Embed Java to convert it back to string.
How to convert String to base64Binary in BPEL process
Or you can use doTranslateFromNative oracle extension function, you will need a NXSD template to use it.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15523_01/integration.1111/e10224/bp_appx_functs.htm#CJACABGA
Cheers,
Vlad

Missing right parenthesis error when querying using a list of values

Would anyone know why this statement gives the ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis error..?
SELECT FIELD_X
FROM TABLE_Y
WHERE FIELD_X IN (
'AJD'
'RED'
'ADF'
'MOI'
The reason why I wanted the AJD, RED, ADF, etc values on top of each other is because I need to add the single quotes around those terms in Excel before pasting them into the SQL statement (there are actually over 400 terms so above just shows a subset)

Fortunately the SQL syntax is documented in the SQL manual
{ expr [, expr ]...
| ( [expr [, expr ]] ...)
}http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/expressions015.htm#i1033664
Note the comma following each value in the syntax diagram and examples.

List item - Record Group Query - Alignment improper Order

Dear All,
When am trying to concatenate two columns using record group query and displaying in the list item, the alignment is not in proper order.
E.g; Below is the columns and data's used in process:
CODE_VALUE     SHORT_DESC     DESCRIPTION
ROLL1     Customer - Non accidental     Production, booking with other carrier, bad projection.
ROLL2     Customer - Accidental     L/C, B/L draft, Customs, Samples, AMS, LAR.
ROLL3     ABC - Lack of empty     Lack of empty units.
ROLL4     ABC CDE - Roll over     AGR RRR decision.
ROLL5     ABC XXX - Accidental     IMO or OOG refused, operational problems, Cut & Run.
ROLL6     ABC YYY - Fictive booking     Equipment buffer, dummy booking.
Below is the record group query used in forms:
PROCEDURE p_when_new_form_instance
IS
GROUP_ID recordgroup;
list_id item := FIND_ITEM ('BLK_CONTROL.LI_ROLL_REASON');
rg_name VARCHAR2 (20) := 'LI_ROLL_REASONS';
status NUMBER;
l_query VARCHAR2 (4000);
BEGIN
l_query :=
'SELECT rpad(short_desc,50,'' '')||'' | ''||description description, code_value code_value FROM codes WHERE code_value IN (''ROLL1'', ''ROLL2'', ''ROLL3'',''ROLL4'',''ROLL5'',''ROLL6'')';
GROUP_ID := CREATE_GROUP_FROM_QUERY (rg_name, l_query);
status := POPULATE_GROUP (GROUP_ID);
POPULATE_LIST (list_id, GROUP_ID);
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
pl_common.when_others;
END;
Moreover i have my list item font property by default as ""MS SANS SERIF" and when i run in Forms Builder am getting the alignment as below.
Result:
====
DESCRIPTION     CODE_VALUE
Customer - Non accidental | Production, booking with other carrier, bad projection.     ROLL1
Customer - Accidental | L/C, B/L draft, Customs, Samples, AMS, LAR.     ROLL2
ABC - Lack of empty | Lack of empty units.     ROLL3
ABC CDE - Roll over | AGR RRR decision.     ROLL4
ABC XXX - Accidental | IMO or OOG refused, operational problems, Cut & Run.     ROLL5
ABC YYY - Fictive booking | Equipment buffer, dummy booking.      ROLL6
Above order is not the expected result as all the |(pipe) symbol should display in proper order as below.
Expected Result:
==========
DESCRIPTION     CODE_VALUE
Customer - Non accidental | Production, booking with other carrier, bad projection.     ROLL1
Customer - Accidental | L/C, B/L draft, Customs, Samples, AMS, LAR.     ROLL2
ABC - Lack of empty | Lack of empty units.     ROLL3
ABC CDE - Roll over | AGR RRR decision.     ROLL4
ABC XXX - Accidental | IMO or OOG refused, operational problems, Cut & Run.     ROLL5
ABC YYY - Fictive booking | Equipment buffer, dummy booking.      ROLL6
I tried with RPAD and LPAD still the alignment issue is there; i know the issue is because of invariable length of the font.
But is there any solution to override this it will be of great help.
So please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks..................
Regards,
Sunil.G

Hi Francois,
Thanks for your reply. I have tried changing the font to "Courier(Western)" it is working fine.
But as per the standards defined, it should be "Ms Sans Serif" nothing apart from that.So that is where the problem lies. :(
Regards,
Sunil.G

Record Group Query - item block

I need to calculate a Record Group Query using a block item value, but when a use the query below the query didn't return rows:
SELECT OID_SIIB_FINALIDADE_TED
     , F.COD_FINALIDADE || ' - ' || F.DES_FINALIDADE DES_FINALIDADE
FROM SIIB_FINALIDADE_TED F
      , ( SELECT P.TP_PARAMETRO
            FROM SIIB_PARAMETROS_GERAIS P
          WHERE P.NM_PARAMETRO = 'TIPO_' || :BLOCK.ITEMX ) PAR -- using the :BLOCK.ITEMX the query did'nt return data
WHERE PAR.TP_PARAMETRO = F.TPO_FINALIDADEBut if a use a static query the Record Group( changing :BLOCK.ITEMX for 'STR0005' ) return the desired values.
This Record Group is used to pupulate a LOV.
Edited by: user5914526 on Feb 15, 2012 9:26 AM
Edited by: user5914526 on Feb 15, 2012 9:26 AM
Edited by: user5914526 on Feb 15, 2012 9:29 AM

No, it doesn't .
And return the message: "There aren't data in the List of Values"
And the block item is not empty or null.
Edited by: user5914526 on Feb 15, 2012 10:13 AM

ORA-00904 when use column alias in Record Group Query

Is it possible to use column aliases in Record Group Queries?
I have a query that runs fine in SQL*Developer, but gives me runtime errors when I use it as a Record Group Query.
When I use it as a Record Group Query, the Form compiles, but at runtime I receive the following errors:
FRM-40502: ORACLE error: unable to read list of values
when I use Help - Display Error, I see:
ORA-00904:"CHILDNAME":invalid identifier
The query is something like this
select decode(complex stuff here) as "childname" ....
I've tried it with and without the double quotes surrounding the alias name, and have also tried it without using the "as" keyword.
I would appreciate any suggestions or insights. I'm using Forms 9.0.4.
Thanks.

It looks like this is caused by bug 725059:
"FILTER BEFORE DISPLAY" DOESN'T WORK IF LOV HAS COLUMN ALIASES (TRIAGE1098)
My LOV does have the Filter Before Display turned on. Here's the text of the bug:
IF an LOV is created with column aliases in the select statement, (eg: select ename emp_name from emp) and the LOV property "Filter Before Display" is "Yes", THEN when you attempt to filter the LOV at runtime, (eg: type '%' then press the 'Find' button) the internal WHERE clause that forms sends to the database is: WHERE column_alias LIKE '%%' This is incorrect syntax. A client-side sqlnet trace shows this. The correct syntax should be: WHERE column LIKE '%%' . The incorrect syntax results in no rows returned. However no error is displayed by forms to the user.

When to use SELECT and END SELECT in the query.

hi all,
When to use SELECT and END SELECT in the query.
regads,
Venkata Suresh Penke.

Hi Suresh..
When do we need to use SELECT .. ENDSELECT
Usually we will never use SELECT .. ENDSELECT as it gives very poor performance.
But whenever we read a single Record we will use it as an alternative for SELECT SINGLE in some scenarios.
Eg: When the Full primary key is not specified in the WHERE clause.
SELECT * FROM MARC INTO WA_MARC UP TO 1 ROWS WHERE MATNR = P_MATNR.
ENDSELECT.
And other scenario is when we perform AGGREGATE OPERATIONS.when the Result is only one row.
SELECT SUM( LABST ) FROM MARD INTO V_LABST UP TO 1 ROWS
WHERE MATNR = P_MATNR.
ENDSELECT.
Note: In The Above scenario we cannot use SELECT SINGLE..
<b>REWARD IF HELPFUL.</b>

SAP Query (SQ01) who and when to use the report

HI Experts!!!
Is there somewhere recorded information: who and when to use the report from SAP Query (SQ01)?
Thanks

Hi
This topic doesn´t belong to the Service Marketplace Area.
regards Martin

Select query-using Union All display duplicate records.

Hello All Gurus-
I am using Oracle 9.i
When i use the following query to fetch the records based on BUILDNUMBERNAME and ASSIGNED_BUILD then i am getting duplicate records -
select T1.ID FROM Defect T1,statedef T2,repoproject T3
WHERE T1.STATE=T2.ID AND T1.repoproject = T3.dbid AND T3.name Like 'ABC' AND T1. ASSIGNED_BUILD like '1.4.5.6'
Union All
select T1.ID FROM Defect T1,statedef T2,repoproject T3
WHERE T1.STATE=T2.ID AND T1.repoproject = T3.dbid AND T3.name Like 'ABC' AND T1.BUILDNUMBERNAME like '1.4.5.6'
How can i use the order by on T1.ID ? When i use the Order by T1.ID then it throws some error.
Kindly help me in this :(
Thanks in advance.

Sorry for not providing all of the details -
I am using Toad tool to run the query.
1-When i use the following query -
Select T1.ID FROM Defect T1,statedef T2,repoproject T3
WHERE T1.STATE=T2.ID AND T1.repoproject = T3.dbid AND T3.name Like 'ABC' AND T1. ASSIGNED_BUILD like '1.4.5.6' order by T1.ID
Union All
select T1.ID FROM Defect T1,statedef T2,repoproject T3
WHERE T1.STATE=T2.ID AND T1.repoproject = T3.dbid AND T3.name Like 'ABC' AND T1.BUILDNUMBERNAME like '1.4.5.6' order by T1.ID
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended.
2-If i am not using the T1.ID and run the following query
Select T1.ID FROM Defect T1,statedef T2,repoproject T3
WHERE T1.STATE=T2.ID AND T1.repoproject = T3.dbid AND T3.name Like 'ABC' AND T1. ASSIGNED_BUILD like '1.4.5.6'
Union All
select T1.ID FROM Defect T1,statedef T2,repoproject T3
WHERE T1.STATE=T2.ID AND T1.repoproject = T3.dbid AND T3.name Like 'ABC' AND T1.BUILDNUMBERNAME like '1.4.5.6'
Then it is running fine but it is displaying the duplicate values like -
00089646
00087780
00089148
00090118
00090410
00088503
00080985
00084526
00087108
00087109
00087117
00088778
00086714
00079518
00087780
00089148
00090392
00090393
00090395
00090398
00090401
00090402
00090403
00090406
00090408
00088503
00080985
00084526
00087108
00087109
00087117
00088778
00086714
00079518

Using record filter query to handle behavior of facets

Hi all,
I know for multiselect/single dimensions we should always perform a dimension query to populate the behaviour of our faceted navigation , but i still want to understand if instead of dimension query i perform a record filter query on my facets click then what all flexibility will i loose with the multi select/single select facets.
Regards,
Edited by: IKumar on Apr 7, 2012 11:48 AM

Hi.
In general record filters and navigation provide similar functionality (faceted search). Depending on your requirements, you can use one or the other or even a combination. There are two things related to records filters that you need to be aware of when considering their use in a scenario like yours.
1. Record filters are applied as the very first step in the query evaluation. They are used to define a sub-set of the indexed data for further query evaluation. This can have an effect on spell corrections and DYM suggestions. Since the MDEX calculates spell corrections and DYM suggestions from the actual data and not based on an external dictionary, you may find that these are more "strict" when using record filters since a smaller data set is used for their evaluation. That said, I have not yet seen this become an issue in real projects for the last 8 years.
2. Record filters do not give you breadcrumb information. Incorporating the record filter as a breadcrumb will require some custom coding (custom = can't copy-paste from the reference app) and could become a bit complicated.
Regards
Pavlos

No Records When Query Using Synonym

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for