Non Conforming Material Report ( NCMR )

Hi ,
I have to create a SAPscript for Incoming Inspection. Can anyone please help me out with this?
Thanks
Deepthi

Hi,
Go through the sample scripts in SAP system,
<b>INSP_INSTRUCTION</b>
<b>QM_LABEL</b>
Regards,
Azaz Ali.
Message was edited by: Azaz Ali

Similar Messages

Excisable and non exciable material report

Dear all,
My client wants a report in such a way that whether the material is excisable or not. Is there any transaction code wherein we can see the details?
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards,
AR

1.in J1ID - chapter id & material combination, you can get the report of both excisable & non excisable material list . Based on material types in this combination, u can get the list.
2.You can also get this list from the table J_1IMTCHID Combination of material number & Chapter id.

Non-Stock material - report -reg

Hi PM Experts,
I want to have a report for Non-Stock material of type - UNBW.But in RESB table ,all the matcodes are appearing,irespective of component line items deleted or not.But when we view in iw33,iw3l,the exact matcode is appearing.
How to identity the which component line items are deleted or not?
Thanks in advance.
prabu

Join table AUFK on order field (AUFNR).
And specify your order type (AUFK-AUART).
You can get the reservation item which is only assigned to order.
Regards
Luke

Report on non conformed dimension

Hi All,
I am using OBIEE 11.1.1.5
We have 2 facts and 4 dimensions out of which only 1 dimension is conformed. We have a report requirement of using the conformed dimension and filtering based on 2 non conformed dimensions and include the measure from both the facts. When the report is created it is throwing error as
"None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request"
for eg : Let say
F1 --> d1,d2
F2 --> d1,d3,d4
the report has d1.c1,d2.c2,d3.c3,F1.M1,F2.M2 and filter by d2.c2 and d3.c3
Thanks in advance.

Check out patch (bug# 11850704)
Also have you set the level for the non conforming dimension at the highest level of granularity

Is there any way to report Non Trade Material/ Consumable Item in Intrastat

Hi Experts,
Is there any way to report a non trade material for which we do not have a material master, in our intrastat report.
During Purchase order creation we will enter Account assignment as K and in the text enter teh description of material.
Can somebody help.
My opinion is that it should have a material number to have a commodity code.
Rgds
Arpit

I think that there is no way to do that.
You can create a parallel branch of the dimension (in the same generation) which includes those entities that only have data (members tagged as Shared Members).
Sorry for my basic english.
Regards,
Gustavo.

Moving Average Price for Non-Valuated Material

Hello Experts
The question may seem to be quirky but need your advice for the below.
My client is buying non-valuated material against a cost center, they do not want to keep the stocks valuated. No value update only quantity update. The accounting documents are the following when the GR is done by receiving folks
Qty of material XYZ goods receipted = 10
Debit     Consumption GL   12345678       10 USD          Cost Center ABC123 (This is a warehouse cost center)
Credit    GR/IR account                            10 USD
Qty of mateiral XYZ issued = 5
The goods are later on issued to Production cost center and the client was the below entries to be passed with MOVING AVERAGE PRICE.
Debit    Consumption GL 12345678           6 USD          Cost Center ABC456 (This is production Cost center)
Credit   Consumption GL 12345678           6 USD          Cost Center ABC123 (This is warehouse cost center)
I am aware that as this is a non valuated material the above entry is not possible. Maybe, I will use BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for the generating the accounting document when the goods are issued from warehosue to production center.
My question is how can i get the moving average price.
Regards
Chokkalingam Pillai

you can have an accounting view for non-valuated materials, this helps for example with purchase requisitions as they could take the valuation price from the material master and the user does not need to enter a valuation manually.
But the material master moving average price cannot be calculated and updated automatically, as it is not foreseen in any standard program to do this for cost center procurement, since SAP only calculates a MAP for valuated stocks.
Further it is not logical to issue non-valuated stock valuated (even with a different price) from cost center to cost center.
It looks like you want to have a kind of internal billing for warehouse services, as you end up with a negative amount in the warehouse cost center which is then the profit.
Why don't you just create a report to run at the end of the month, listing all goods issue movements with their cost centers and taking the price from last PO (or from material master if you decide to maintain it manually) and use this for a manual cost center posting in CO module

OBIEE 11g: Non conformed dimension filter

Hi,
I have two fact tables and some confromed and non conformed dimensions between the fact tabels.
The hiearchies being built and proper levels were set for the fact tables. The measures of the fact were set to the total level of the non confromed dimension tables.
The fact also hold some non aggregated columns (baseline columns), all the base line columns where moved to a logical dim table.
The report involves both the fact tables, conformed and non conformed dimension columns.
When we built the report with all these columns the report is showing fine. But when we add the filter with the non conformed dimension the report is throwing some error.
Error Details
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14023] None of the fact sources for D01 Date.Date are compatible with the detail filter [D05 Non Confrm Dimension.Code = 'AFS']. (HY000)
The above functionality was working fine with OBIEE 10g and have implemented it many times before.
There is one patch available for this issue but it is available only for windows 32 bit enironment.
Patch details
Patch 14210864: OBIEE 11G: CONFORMING DIMENSION SETTINGS FROM 10G NOT WORKING IN 11G
Can anyone give some suggestion or workaround? I can't do any change in Datamodel.
Thanks,
Vino

Hi Vinod,
In OBIEE 10g, we are running into similar error when we add filter from non conformed dimensions in a report, so can you please share patch download details like where to download or if we have to raise a SR for the Patch 14210864.
Thanks in Advance!!

Multiple facts with non-conforming dimensions

Hi, I have a question re: using multiple facts in a report, where one of the facts has a non-conforming dimension.
I have two metrics: "PAYROLL" and "UNRECONCILED DIFFS". The payroll metric is at the employee level, but the "UNRECONCILED DIFFS" is not. Here's what I've done so far:
1. Set up a single logical fact table in the business layer
2. Created 2 LTSs. One has "employee" level, one has "all employees" (i.e. the grand total level)
3. Created metrics for PAYROLL and UNRECONCILED DIFFS, each pointed to the proper LTS
4. Set the "employee" hierarchy level for "UNRECONCILED DIFFS" to the "all employees" level
This is working...kind of. If I have three employees with a payroll amount of $1000, and there is a $500 unreconciled diff, the report shows up like:
Employee Payroll UnrecDiff
Emp1 $1000 $500
Emp2 $1000 $500
Emp3 $1000 $500
Total $3000 $500
Here's what I'm wondering...instead of having the unreconciled difference repeated for each employee...is there any way it can just be $0 or (even better) NULL, but then still show up as $500 in the total line?
Thanks!
Scott

Hi
The problem you describe is similar to mine (I wrote several threads ago).
That is, if there is a non-conformed dimension in a report then the column from the fact table which is not connected with those non-conformed dimensions containes zeros or blanks.
Was this problem solved? I didn't quite catch one of previuos messages... If you can please repeat it more detailed.
What I tried to do is to set Total level in the Content tab (LTS properties). In this example - I could set Total level to JOBS in the plan type dimension. But it didn't help.
So if you know what to do then please describe it here...

Sales - Dummy Plant for Non-Valuated Material

Dear Gurus,
I have a requirement for SD implementation where the business involves non-valuated material.
The sales scenario does not required data on stock to be captured in the system.
There are 5 sites to where the same material is supplied from.
Hence, the sales documents to be configured are sales order and order-related billing.
However, the following requirements are also included in the sales scenario:
1. Generate a sales report, with sales order data extracted by sites where the material is supplied from.
2. Product price for the same material differs, because it depends on the site that the material is supplied from.
I have thought of using a dummy plant to cater for this scenario.
Seeking your advice whether this is a good practise for this case.
Batch management has also been suggested to me.
However, per my reading, batch management is closely related to goods issue (which is not in scope).
I would appreciate your advice on this matter.
TQ,
HJMY
Edited by: HJMY on Apr 13, 2011 6:38 PM

Hai,
To involve Non valuated material in SAP, instead of creating Dummy plant, create a Non valuated material type NV0102003. Through material master it can be easily achieved by creating a material type without Accounting tab.
So in SAP system the stock will be shown but without any financial impact, and stock also can be monitored thro system.
In MM01 every thing is common between the finished goods and Non valuated goods.
Automatic batch management will be determined in Delivery order creation.
Since you created the material you can maintain the rate with the plant combination.
and sales report can be generated with the delivery plant combination
Regards,
Mani

Non-conformed dimension [nQSError: 14020]

Hi,
I have linked two cubes in a report, which have some conformed and some non-conformed dimensions. I have set the LTS of the non-conformed dimensions to the total level.
This creates a warning in Administrator when doing the Global Consistency check:
*[39054] Fact table "ORACLE_BUSINESS_INTELLIGENCE_1"."CubeXXX" is not joined to logical dimension table "ORACLE_BUSINESS_INTELLIGENCE_1"."DIM_XXX". This will cause problems when extracting project(s).*
What does 'extracting projects' mean here ???
And when I run a report on the two fact tables I get an error in the logs
*...converted to NULL because [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request*
Am I missing something or is this related to the rumor that non-conformed dimensions are broken in 11.1.1.3 ?
Regards,
Knut

Below is some useful and related information from oracle about OBIEE 11g warnings during consistency check:
Warning: [39055] Fact table "HR"."FACT - HC Budget" is not joined to tables in logical dimension "HR"."DIM - HR EmployeeDim". This will cause problems when extracting project(s).
Description: Even though this fact logical table source has an aggregate grain set in this dimension, no valid physical join was found that connects to any logical table source in this dimension.
This means that either no join exists at all, or it does exist but is invalid because it connects a higher-level fact source to a lower-level dimensional source. Such joins are invalid and ignored by the Oracle BI Server because, if followed, they would lead to double counting in query answers.
For example, consider Select year, yearlySales. Even if a join exists between monthTable and yearlySales table on yearId, it cannot be used because such a join would overstate the results by a factor of 12 (the number of months in each year).
All three of the given validation rules are related to the same issue.
Please read through the above text to see if it will help with your issue.
Thanks,
-Amith.l

Non storaged material in Storage Location after mov 653

I have a non storage material.
when the return delivery picking was done SAP let to put a storage location. for this Delivery item category wit has not flagged "Do Not Check Storage Location". So it has to be checked. Its also true that we have Storage location is absolutely necessary, so without storage locatin we cant deliver, but we should have an error message and not let us deliver using a storage location when its a not storaged material.
And the problem is that when you have the material in the storage location you cant do nothing because the material has no storage data.

Hi
For the Return delivery , delivery item category is not flagged with the feild "Do Not Check Storage Location " . It is not checked because a Returns order are mostly created wrf to sales order / billing document/delivery document. So once you copy the data to the returns order and when you do Post Goods Receipt then at that time there is no need to copy the sloc.
But ,if the material doesn't have storage data then we cant retrieve how much stock is available in storage locations. So we have to run the report to know how much stock is available in the storage location
Regards
Srinath

Vendor non conformance not displaying green in exception

Dear All,
Vendor non conformance quality notification is not displaying green in exception even after completing well before required end date in QM10.
Can you please let me know the logic of report of QM10 for vendor non conformance notification type.
Thanks,
Naren

I assume you executed QM10 with "required start/end" for field for monitor.
-if required start is future : green
-if start is past, but end is future : yellow
-if end is past : red
Exception depends on value of field for monitor on selection screen.
Regards, DoWook KIM

Modelling 2 Fact Tables with Non-Conforming Dimension in OBIEE 11g

Hi all,
I have two fact tables (Fact 1 and Fact 2) and two dimension tables (Product and Rule). The Product dimension table is a conforming dimension and is used in both fact tables, but the Rule dimension is a non-conforming dimension which is used only one fact table. I'm using OBIEE 11g (11.1.1.6.0).
====
Fact 1
====
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status
S001 | P001 | 100 | bla bla bla bla bla | N
S001 | P002 | 200 | bla bla bla bla bla | N
S002 | P001 | 200 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y
S002 | P003 | 250 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y
Notes for Fact 1:
- One Sales ID can have multiple Product IDs
- Sales Description and Sales Status are the same for one Sales ID (repeating Sales Description and Sales Status for the same Sales ID)
====
Fact 2
====
Sales ID | Product ID | Rule ID | Score
S001 | P001 | R001 | 2
S001 | P001 | R002 | 3
S001 | P002 | R003 | 1
S002 | P001 | R003 | 1
S002 | P003 | R002 | 2
S002 | P003 | R004 | 5
Notes for Fact 2:
- One combination of Sales ID and Product ID can have multiple Rule ID
I'm wondering how best to model these tables so that I can create this report (number of the dimension and fact tables created in the business model, level mapping, aggregation rule, etc)? Any suggestion/advice on how to achieve this?
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status | Rule ID | Score
S001 | P001 | 100 | bla bla bla bla bla | N | R001 | 2
S001 | P001 | 100 | bla bla bla bla bla | N | R002 | 3
S001 | P002 | 200 | bla bla bla bla bla | N | R003 | 1
S002 | P001 | 200 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y | R003 | 1
S002 | P003 | 250 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y | R002 | 2
S002 | P003 | 250 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y | R004 | 5
Thank you very much!

Hi Dhar, thanks for the suggestions.
I tested what you suggested, but the result is not as per my expectation mentioned above. Here's what I did:
1. In physical layer:
- I joined Fact 1 table with Product dimension table only
- I joined Fact 2 table with Product and Rule dimension tables
2. In business model layer:
- I created 3 logical tables: Fact, Product, and Rule
- The Product table contains the Product ID and Product Name from the Product dimension table in the physical layer
- I created the hierarchy (logical dimension) for Product with only ProductTotal level (as the grand total level) and ProductDetail level that contains Product ID and Product Name
- The Rule table contains the Rule ID and Rule Name from the Rule dimension table in the physical layer
- I created the hierarchy (logical dimension) for Rule with only RuleTotal level (as the grand total level) and RuleDetail level that contains Rule ID and Rule Name
- The Fact table contains 2 logical tables sources: Fact 1 (which logical level in the Content tab is mapped to ProductDetail and RuleTotal) and Fact 2 (which logical level in the Content tab is mapped to ProductDetail and RuleDetail)
- The Fact table contains Sales ID logical column (mapped to both Fact 1 and Fact 2 logical table sources)
- The Fact table also contains Sales Description and Sales Status logical columns (mapped to only Fact 1), which aggregation rule is the default to None
- The Fact table also contains Quantity logical column (mapped to only Fact 1), which aggregation rule is set to Sum
- The Fact table also contains Score logical column (mapped to only Fact 2), which aggregation rule is set to Sum
OBIEE returns the expected result when I retrieve the report:
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status
However, OBIEE returns an error when I retrieve the reports:
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status | Rule ID
or
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status | Rule ID | Score
The error is:
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request FACT.SALES_STATUS. (HY000)
And the Score column is blank when I retrieved this report:
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status | Score
Any suggestion anyone? Please help. Thanks a lot!
Edited by: stewartlife on Nov 29, 2012 4:01 PM

Multiple facts with some non-conforming dimensions

Hi, in our datamart, I have several fact tables. The JOBS fact table includes dimensions of time, employee, org, and job.
Other fact tables include those 4 base conformed dimensions, plus dimensions specific to the fact. For example, BENEFITS includes a "plan type" dimension, etc.
When reporting, I want counts from the basic JOBS fact table to always show up - even if other data in the report contains the "non-conformed" dimensions. For example, I'd like a report that lists time periods, employee counts (from JOBS fact), and enrolled employee counts (from BENEFITS fact), something like this:
Month Benefit Plan Emps Enrolled Emps
Jan 2009 Health Insurance 10,000 8,000
Jan 2009 401k Plan 10,000 4,000
Jan 2009 AD&D 10,000 1,000
When I try to produce this report, because "benefit plan" is not a dimension tied to the JOBS data, the EMPS column comes out blank. Yes, I can add a total row at the bottm to show it...but I really want the 10,000 to show up on each row (also because I want to calculate a % of people enrolled out of the total population).
What's the best way to accomplish this? Also given that I have 4 or 5 other fact tables, and each of them have their own "personal" dimensions in addition to the conformed ones.
Thanks in advance!
Scott

Hi
The problem you describe is similar to mine (I wrote several threads ago).
That is, if there is a non-conformed dimension in a report then the column from the fact table which is not connected with those non-conformed dimensions containes zeros or blanks.
Was this problem solved? I didn't quite catch one of previuos messages... If you can please repeat it more detailed.
What I tried to do is to set Total level in the Content tab (LTS properties). In this example - I could set Total level to JOBS in the plan type dimension. But it didn't help.
So if you know what to do then please describe it here...

Non-conforming Dimensions modelling

Hi
I am using BIEE version 11.1.1.6
I am struggling to model a situation where I do have 2 fact tables F_1 & F_2 and 3 dimensions D_1, D_2, D_3
D_3 is the only conformed dimension
D_1 is only connected to F_1, D_2 is only connected to F_2.
Content levels for measures in F_1 are set to Total for D_2.
Content levels for measures in F_2 are set to Total for D_1.
In Answers I can't create a report where I filter on one or both of the non-conformed dimensions.
I assume it's still possible to use non-conforming dimensions in analysis
and filter the analysis on values from the non-conforming dimension? (The part of the analysis that can be filtered by these values, measures not connected to the non-conforming dimension will of course not be filtered).
Are there any rules to follow in 11.1.1.6 modelling non-conforming dimensions besides setting measure content level to Total for the non-conforming dimension?
Thanks for your help
Andy

Hi Andy
Please find the blogs it will resolve ur issue.
http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/08/joining-two-fact-tables-with-different.html
http://www.kpipartners.com/blog/bid/83120/What-To-Do-When-OBIEE-Fact-Tables-Do-Not-Join-to-All-Dimension-Tables
Thanks
NK

Non Conforming Material Report ( NCMR )

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for