OBI Enterprise Edition hierarchical levels definition - nQSError: 10058

Hi,
i'm trying, in the BI administration tool, to define a dimension hierarchy based on not star nor snowflake scheme. I've a physical fact-table RICETTA linked to the first level physical table DISTRETTO. the physical table DISTRETTO is then linked to the both upper levels: USL and REGIONE. The conceptual hierarchy is DISTRETTO -> USL -> REGIONE. how can I define the logical hierarchy if there's no physical link between REGIONE and USL tables?
The Answer front-end returns the seguent error: Stato: HY000. Codice: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 14026] Unable to navigate requested expression: USL.NOM_REGIONE. Please fix the metadata consistency warnings. (HY000).
Thank for help

If you followed up the setup document (http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21043_01/bi.1111/e10541/configscorecard.htm), make sure you Restart the Oracle BI Server, through the Enterprise Manager for your bi instance.
After that, make sure you give your 'BIsystem' role permissions for "Allowing or Disallowing Direct Database Requests".
(You can access that through your RPD->Manage->Identities. Select BIsystem, click on "Permissions", Select tab "Query Limits", and select "Allow" in the "Allow or Disallow Direct Database Requests").
And make sure you either Delete the configured database ("System DB (Update me)") that comes with the Samples, in the RPD, that already has a connection named "BSC", change the connection name in that database, or just use it as the BSC annotations schema.
If you still have problems after that, make sure the connection credentials in your BSC connections are good to go.
Hope it helps.
Best regards.

Similar Messages

Is OBI 10.1.3.3.2 is just same as OBI Enterprise Edition Version 10.1.3.3?

With the help of the link http://otndnld.oracle.co.jp/document/products/OBIEE/10133/generic/e10417.pdf
on the page 17 it is clearly written that OBI is compatible with "SP1 or higher" for Microsoft Windows 2003
As the document is for Oracle Business intelligence Suite Enterprise Edition Version 10.1.3.3 so just for the information can any one confirm me whether it will be compatible with Oracle Business Intelligence 10.1.3.3.2 ?
Thanks in Advance,
Dipayan

This has stayed the same up until today. (System Requirements and Supported Platforms for Oracle Business Intelligence Suite Enterprise Edition Version 10.1.3.3, 10.1.3.4, Rev. I)
Cheers,
C.

Data Level Security in OBIEE Enterprise Edition

HI,
would like to know how to implement row-level security in OBIEE Enterprise Edition
Setting up the context right here, considering a hierarchy of an organization that goes up to 4 levels as below:
VP >Senior manager>Manager>clerk
Now, the situation is such that a manager should be able to view its subordinates data but not the data of any other team to which he does not have access. And also the manager should view only his regions data.Same goes for other hierarchies in the organization.
Any pointers in this regards i.e OBIEE ADMIN TOOL: SECURITY AUTHENTICATION THROUGH EXTERNAL DATABASE would be of great help.
Source system is SIEBEL CRM 7.8
THanks
Gutha

Hi,
I can help you for Authentication using BI Server.
For teh same you can use admin tool then manage>security> users and Groups.
You can create different groups as well as users accrording to you hierarchy and then provide privilages users or groups according to your need like particular user can view the data of particular level.
When you create users then in the user page you can provide the filter conditions in filter tab and same as in groups.
Regards
Tarang Jain

10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error

Hi!
When change column change, first query return OK. Then I choose drill down level of year and this error occured.
What does this error means?
View Display Error
Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
Error Details
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15039] Level [TIMES.DAY_ID, NADZORNE_EKIPE.ID] has drilldown levels associated with multiple (likely overlapping) dimensions: (1) degenerate dimension, (2) degenerate dimension. Please check logical table key definitions, particularly for fact tables, and level-based measure definitions. (HY000)
SQL Issued: SELECT TIMES.CALENDAR_YEAR_ID saw_0, "TIMES"."CALENDAR_QUARTER_ID" saw_1, NADZORNE_EKIPE.NAZIV saw_2, FCT_ZAPISNICI.ID saw_3, FCT_ZAPISNICI.NEPRAVILNOST saw_4, FCT_ZAPISNICI.NEPRAVILNOST/FCT_ZAPISNICI.ID*100 saw_5, FCT_ZAPISNICI.ID-FCT_ZAPISNICI.NEPRAVILNOST saw_6, FCT_ZAPISNICI.PREKOSOV saw_7, FCT_ZAPISNICI.PREKMASE saw_8, FCT_ZAPISNICI.PREKNOSIV saw_9, FCT_ZAPISNICI.PREKDIMENZIJE saw_10, FCT_ZAPISNICI.DJELJIV_TERET saw_11, FCT_ZAPISNICI.NEDJELJIV_TERET saw_12, FCT_ZAPISNICI.PRAVNA_OSOBA saw_13, FCT_ZAPISNICI.FIZICKA_OSOBA saw_14, AGGREGATE(saw_5 BY ), AGGREGATE(saw_6 BY ), AGGREGATE(saw_5 BY saw_0), AGGREGATE(saw_6 BY saw_0) FROM "TEB Data Warehouse Solution" WHERE ((TIMES.DAY_ID >= date '2009-01-01') AND (TIMES.DAY_ID <= date '2009-12-31')) AND ("TIMES"."CALENDAR_YEAR_ID" = 2009) ORDER BY saw_0, saw_1, saw_2
THX

Your error is this:
nQSError: 15039 Level http://TIMES.DAY_ID, NADZORNE_EKIPE.ID has drilldown levels associated with multiple (likely overlapping) dimensions: (1) degenerate dimension, (2) degenerate dimension. Please check logical table key definitions, particularly for fact tables, and level-based measure definitions.
Did you check logical table key definitions, particularly for fact tables, and level-based measure definitions ?

Solution Manager upgrade to enterprise Edition

Dear All,
We are running Solution Manager 4.0 in Win2k3 32 bit server
with Oracle 10.2.0.2 Non Unicode version and ST patch level 11.
The memory of the server is recently increased from 4GB to 12GB.
We do not have any Java Stack.
We have configured EWA / System monitoring in our Solman and
also we have huge (really large) no. of documents uploaded into it.
We want to upgrade our Solman to Solution Manager Enterprise edition.
Can this upgrade from NUC to UC is possible with 32 bit OS platform
or we need to change our OS to 64 bit? If we change our OS to 64 bit,
will it have any impact on our existing application?
Also, is it possible to migrate the system as it is to a HPUX 11.31 box
without loosing any documents?
Kindly provide your views.
Thanks & Regards
Sudip

I strongly recomment to go for 64 bit in any case, 32 Bit is history...
For the migration to 64 bti you need to perform a homogenious system copy (Windows 32 Bit / Windows 64 Bit), if your target platform is HP-UX, then you need to perform a heterogenious system copy, which is more complex. Documents will not be lost during systemcopy operations.
regards
Peter

Solaris x86 with Oracle RAC 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0

Hello,
Maybe you can help me (new on RMAN backup) in doing this.
I have configured a single Oracle 10g database to have backup with RMAN with following steps:
1. $ mkdir $ORACLE_BASE/rman_scripts
2. $ mkdir $ORACLE_BASE/logs
3. $ mkdir $ORACLE_BASE/tracking
4. $ mkdir $ORACLE_BASE/c_backup
5. $ sqlplus sys/<password> as sysdba
6. SQL> alter system set db_recovery_file_dest_size = 50G scope=both;
7. SQL> alter system set db_recovery_file_dest='${ ORACLE_BASE}/flash_recovery_ area' scope=both;
8. SQL> alter system set log_archive_dest_10='location= use_db_recovery_file_dest';
9. SQL> shutdown immediate
10. SQL> startup nomount
11. SQL> alter database archivelog;
12. SQL> alter database open;
13. SQL> alter database enable block change tracking using file '${ORACLE_BASE}/tracking/rman_ change_track.f';
14. $ rman target /
15. RMAN> CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK
TO '/var/opt/oracle/flash_ recovery_area/ORCL/c_backup/% F';
16. RMAN> CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP ON;
17. RMAN> CONFIGURE BACKUP OPTIMIZATION ON;
18. RMAN> CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO RECOVERY WINDOW OF 7 DAYS;
19. RMAN> exit
I need to configure incremental backup with RMAN on a two node Solaris x86 with Oracle RAC 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 installation.
We also use ASM to store database files, and have Oracle software installed on separate file systems (two Oracle roots for Node1 and Node2).
I have following questions:
1) where to put Flash Recovery Area (FRA)?
I saw recommendations to put FRA on the ASM, is this the best way to do it?
2) Can I put FRA on another file system (not on the ASM) which is available only from Node1? This way I can save space on the ASM.
3) Is it possible/recommended to run RMAN from Node1 only?
Below is the script used to run RMAN on the normal Oracle database (without RAC) which I need to change :
=============================================================================================
2.0 Oracle backup script: /opt/app/oracle/rman_scripts/backup.sh
Use this for daily backups, possiblly as a cron job.
Once a week run this: /opt/app/oracle/rman_scripts/backup.sh FULL
All other days of the week: /opt/app/oracle/rman_scripts/backup.sh INCREMENTAL
Note: You may have to change ORACLE_SID, ORACLE_BASE below to match your database.
=============================================================================================
#!/usr/bin/ksh
ORACLE_SID=orcl
ORACLE_BASE=/opt/app/oracle
ORACLE_HOME=${ORACLE_BASE}/product/10.2.0/db_1
PATH=${ORACLE_HOME}/bin:/usr/bin
LOGDIR=${ORACLE_BASE}/logs
LOGFILE=${LOGDIR}/rman.log
if [[ $# < 1 ]]
then
echo "usage: backup.sh FULL|INCREMENTAL"
exit;
fi
BACKUPTYPE=${1}
full='FULL'
incremental='INCREMENTAL'
if [[ $BACKUPTYPE == $full ]]
then
$ORACLE_HOME/bin/rman target / nocatalog log ${LOGFILE} append << eof
run {
backup database;
SQL 'alter system archive log current';
backup archivelog all;
delete noprompt obsolete;
exit;
eof
echo ''
fi
if [[ $BACKUPTYPE == $incremental ]]
then
$ORACLE_HOME/bin/rman target / nocatalog log ${LOGFILE} append << eof
run {
backup database;
backup incremental level 1 database;
SQL 'alter system archive log current';
backup archivelog all;
delete noprompt obsolete;
exit;
eof
echo ''
fi

Hi [email protected],
Q1) where to put Flash Recovery Area (FRA)?
A1) With RAC: on the shared storage
I saw recommendations to put FRA on the ASM, is this the best way to do it?
If you want your backups to be available for both nodes you have to use shared storage or tape using an mml library.
So if you want to use the FRA for rman backups and the database is on ASM just make ASM the standard for the FRA as well.
Q2) Can I put FRA on another file system (not on the ASM) which is available only from Node1? This way I can save space on the ASM.
A2) Than you cannot recover in case Node1 is down. Best would be to send your storage admin to a training course so he can manage the clustered raw devices needed for ASM.
Q3) Is it possible/recommended to run RMAN from Node1 only?
A3) No see A2.
Regards,
Tycho

Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition user license in Standard Edition

Hi,
If I purchase Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition license (user or processor), and somehow if I decedided to downgrade the server from Enterprise Edition to Standard Edition, is these license still valid to apply to the Standard Edition server??
Thanks

I'm sure Oracle would have no objection to you using a less expensive version, but you may want to run that question by your Oracle sales rep to see if there is a notification requirement.
Whether there would be an opportunity to get some level of refund, though, would be a question for your Oracle sales rep. I would tend to doubt it but you never know.
Justin

Database link between Oracle Standard Edition and Oracle Enterprise Edition

Hi,
I am looking at setting up a data transfer process between an Oracle 11g Enterprise Edition database and an Oracle 11g Standard Edition database. Database links would be required each way.
I heard once that this is not permitted as connecting Standard to Enterprise via a DB Link means that the Standard Edition database would now need an Enterprise license.
I have searched around but can't find anything to confirm this. Am I being mislead by this information? Is it permitted to
connect Standard to Enterprise via a DB Link?
John

John O'Toole wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at setting up a data transfer process between an Oracle 11g Enterprise Edition database and an Oracle 11g Standard Edition database. Database links would be required each way.
I heard once that this is not permitted as connecting Standard to Enterprise via a DB Link means that the Standard Edition database would now need an Enterprise license.
============================================================================
Where did you hear that?
--- On the internet
And you believed it?
--- Sure. They can't put anything on the internet that isn't true
Where did you hear that?
--- On the internet.
============================================================================
I have searched around but can't find anything to confirm this. Am I being mislead by this information? Is it permitted to
connect Standard to Enterprise via a DB Link?I would be shocked if it were not permitted due to licensing issues. When a db-1 has a link pointing to db-2, as far as db-2 is concerned db-1 is just another client .. no different than sqlplus. If you have an Enterprise Edition database, of course it will need to be properly licensed. But that doesn't mean all of its clients (including a SE database) have to be EE licensed.
But even my reply is just something you read on the internet. Licensing questions can only be definitively answered by Oracle itself. Ultimately you will need to put your hands on an official Oracle document or a written statement from someone authorized to make such statements.
>
John

Do I need Enterprise Edition license for Grid Control

We are planning on installing Oracle 10g Grid Control onto a server that does not currently have Oracle on at all. It is a 2 processor server. Using this we will be monitoring Oracle databases on 2 other servers, each of which also have 2 processors.
My question is do I need Enterprise Edition or will Standard Edition be ok? We will be using the diagnostics pack in Grid Control, and also rman on the same server. Do I definitely need Enterprise Edition?
Many thanks,
Paula.

Licence questions should be always addressed to an authorized Oracle sales representative, no one in this forum can give you an official and committed answer, you can rely on.
At least documentation shows all Management Packs require the Enterprise Edition:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/license.102/b14199/options.htm#CIHGFIAF
Werner

Need information related to oracle 10g standard / enterprise edition (diff)

Hi,
I had developed my application using oracle 10g enterprise edition and now i wanna to shift the entire thing to oracle 10g standard edition.
i Ha ve query on thiis point.
1) Is it safe to do so.
2) what are the difference between both the edition.
3) what are the restriction i can face if i am moving form 10g enterprise to 10g standard.
4) what are the steps i have to do to do the same.
5) risk,efficency,restriction and all the major difference.
If you can suggest me something, then it will be very helpful for me.
Thanks,
Anit
Edited by: Anit A. on Sep 5, 2008 12:24 AM

Hi Anit,
Is it safe to do so.ALWAYS check with your CSR for licensing deals, things change constantlt.
what are the difference between both the edition.EE has all the goodies! Here is my list of differences in SE and EE: http://www.dba-oracle.com/art_so_oracle_standard_enterprise_edition.htm
what are the restriction i can face if i am moving form 10g enterprise to 10g standard.No replication, no Data Guard, no stored outlines, no MV's . . . .
what are the steps i have to do to do the same.Just install SE, point your $ORACLE_HOME to it and bounce
Hope this answers your question . . .
Donald K. Burleson
Oracle Press author
Author of "Oracle Tuning: The Definitive Reference":
http://www.dba-oracle.com/bp/s_oracle_tuning_book.htm

[NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred

Hello guys,
I have one fact table (Fact) and five dimension tables (Dim A, Dim B, Dim C, Dim D and Dim E).
The fact structure: PK_Fact (primary key), Column A, Column B, ..*
The dimensions structure:
Dim A : PK_Dim_A (primary key), Column A1, Column A2, ..*
Dim B : PK_Dim_B (primary key), Column B1, Column B2, ..*
Dim C : PK_Dim_C (primary key), Column C1, Column C2, ..*
Dim D : PK_Dim_D (primary key), Column D1, Column D2, ..*
Dim E : PK_Dim_E (primary key), Column E1, Column E2, ..*
The fact table is connected to Dim A with PK_Dim_A and PK_Fact, to Dim B with PK_Dim_B and PK_Fact, to Dim C with PK_Dim_C and PK_Fact, to Dim D with PK_Dim_D and PK_Fact, to Dim E with PK_Dim_E and PK_Fact. The joins have been defined in the physical layer and in the business layer.
Fact-->Dim A
Fact-->Dim B
Fact-->Dim C
Fact-->Dim D
Fact-->Dim E
When I request column(s) from fact table and one other dimension table, everything is fine. When I request columns from fact table and more than one other dimension table, I have the following message error :
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source...does not contain mapping for .... (HY000)
Please could you help me to resolve this error
Thank you very much.

Hi,
have you define the level for all the dimensions for the Logical Table Source of your Logical Fact Table? When you perfrom the consistency check (Ctrl+k) do you receive any warning or error?
Thank you.
Regards,
Gianluca

NQSError: 10058 - Unable to Navigate Requested Expression Error in OBIEE

We are getting the below error when we try to generate report using a dimension column and a fact column.
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 14026] Unable to navigate requested expression: FILTER(# of Responses:[DAggr(Fact - Leads & Interest .# of Responses by [ Dim - Contact.First Name, Dim - Contact.ROW_ID, Team & Opty Based Org.POSTN_WID, Team & Opty Based Org.Level 1 Employee Name, LN Leads & Interest.ROW_ID] SB Revenue Attributes Total,Sales Velocity Attributes Total)] USING Team & Opty Based Org.Level 1 Employee Name <> 'Test, USLMMarketing' and (LN Leads & Interest.Customer Supplied Email <> email@removed ' or LN Leads & Interest.Customer Supplied Email is null)). Please fix the metadata consistency warnings. (HY000)
We are using the below logical formula for the measure column.
FILTER(Core."Fact - Leads & Interest "."# Of Response Final" USING (Core."LN Leads & Interest"."Customer Supplied Email" <> email@removed ' OR Core."LN Leads & Interest"."Customer Supplied Email" IS NULL ) AND Core."Team & Opty Based Org"."Level 1 Employee Name" <> 'Test, USLMMarketing')
We have this measure in a logical fact table.
Please help me know why would this error occur.

Sorry i missed while pasting the formula. Below is the logical column formula.
FILTER(Core."Fact - Leads & Interest "."# Of Response Final" USING (Core."LN Leads & Interest"."Customer Supplied Email" <> '[email protected]' OR Core."LN Leads & Interest"."Customer Supplied Email" IS NULL ) AND Core."Team & Opty Based Org"."Level 1 Employee Name" <> 'Test, USLMMarketing')
This measure is working properly with other dimension attributes in the subject area.

Oracle standard edition one and enterprise edition difference

Can the stadard edition one support user roles and access priveleges for them, for example can I create a user called u1, create an access privelege read_only and assign u1 to read_only.
Also, can I do database audits on the standard edition one database.
Can also be reached at [email protected]
Appreciate your response.
Thanks

Hello,
Here is the basic difference between Standard Edition One and Enterprise Edition
Oracle Database Standard Edition One :
Oracle Database Standard Edition One delivers unprecedented ease of
use, power, and performance for workgroup, department-level, and Web
applications. Standard Edition One can only be licensed on servers with
a maximum capacity of two processors.
Oracle Database Enterprise Edition :
Oracle Database Enterprise Edition provides the performance,
availability, scalability, and security required for mission-critical
applications such as high-volume online transaction processing (OLTP)
applications, query-intensive data warehouses, and demanding Internet
applications. Oracle Database Enterprise Edition contains all of the
components of Oracle Database, and can be further enhanced with the
purchase of the options and packs.
https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/f?p=130:14:3297805768795637384::::p14_database_id,p14_docid,p14_show_header,p14_show_help,p14_black_frame,p14_font:NOT,271886.1,1,1,1,helvetica
Check the url you will find more info.
-Sri

Justifying Oracle Enterprise Edition

Hi Experts,
No offense but this question is not technical and more of a management type question. We have one Standard edition environment in our company and I need to give a justification to upgrade that environment to enterprise.
I am looking for a FORMAL Justification document which justifies the need for enterprise edition. Again I DO NOT WANT the differences between standard and enterprise edition, I know those very well. I need a PROPER detailed document to present in front of my management.
I know that you guys are not aware of my company and company needs but you can think of any mid-level to high-level company. I will really appreciate the response.
Please help me Oracle ACES.

982083 wrote:
Hi Experts,
No offense but this question is not technical and more of a management type question. We have one Standard edition environment in our company and I need to give a justification to upgrade that environment to enterprise.
I am looking for a FORMAL Justification document which justifies the need for enterprise edition. Again I DO NOT WANT the differences between standard and enterprise edition, I know those very well. I need a PROPER detailed document to present in front of my management.
I know that you guys are not aware of my company and company needs but you can think of any mid-level to high-level company. I will really appreciate the response.
Please help me Oracle ACES.Im not an ACE but Ill give it a go if thats ok.
You have a database. you have a business. Take any feature in EE thats not in SE. What is the business impact of implementing the EE feature. Whats the direct cost benefit of the investment.
Take partitioning for example. Are your tables so large that they're impacting business with performance? can you use table union selects and view partitioning to overcome this? Not knowing your business, lets say its order based, is non partitioned tables making a select come out in 5 seconds instead of 2 seconds? can you live with this? whats the financial impact of this? Is it less than the extra SW licence cost with EE? If I was presented with a request for 50k to upgrade to EE, theyre the questions Id ask.
how about RAC or dataguard. if your Db goes down, can the business live with some downtime? Is business impact less than SW cost. could you live with SE standby instead? could you live with SE RAC?
how about performance tools. Could you invest some time into writing scripts, thats what most SE DBAs do.
I'll echo others above. Why do you want to go to EE? why would you be looking to impose the extra cost on your business.
why not write a paper on how you can save the company money by staying on SE by implementing some homebrew tuning? watch as the managers give you thousands in extra salary for saving them money.

Delay when applying large, hierarchical type definitions

Hello,
I searched around using various terms, but couldn't readily find posts on what I'm experiencing.
Has anyone else noticed huge delays when applying large, hierarchical type definitions? I've got about a dozen nested type definitions of clusters, each containing anywhere from 10 to 100 controls, and they're used throughout a large application. When I open any member of that hierarchy, make a small change, and hit apply, I see the hourglass (spinning ring of death in Vista/7) for a good two to five minutes.
A short term workaround has been to close all dependent VIs and typedefs, and then make an isolated edit. Then, if I open the whole application again, I see some compiling taking place, but it seems to take a lot less time than when the whole application is open.
I could have sworn that I read a discussion by some others commiserating about this at some point, but now I can't find it.
Has this been addressed, and has anyone heard if there's any development effort to improve this?
Thanks,
Jim

Hi Fred,
Thanks for getting back to me on this.
> You could use more specific typedefs and not a massive one to pass data through VIs.
It's funny, I've actually adopted using larger typdefs in the last year or two for architectural simplicity, and that's when I've noticed this becoming a problem. In fact, for what it's worth, right now I'm using a data reference to store the "data dictionary" (large typedef) but that doesn't really help the issue.
From an architectural sense, it makes things easier for me because I have much fewer wires to pass around most of my data is in one place.
> Or you could pass a queue reference to the subVIs and have the queue be made of of elements that are the large type definition.
Actually, I'm using a data reference right now, which is somewhat analogous to what you're suggesting. (Maybe not? I also use queues and notifiers depending on the situation.) I haven't really seen this technique help the issue; I'm still noticing the large delays, but only when editing the typedefs.
The only way I've really found relief is to separate the large typedef into smaller ones and pass them around separately. This is kind of a pain because it means I have many more references to data structures to keep track of.
> If this is causing major problems, let me know, and I'll pass along your concerns to R&D.
Actually, if I'm to be honest, it really is starting to become a hassle. I hit apply and end up working on something else for a few minutes while the compiler chugs away. I'd be really interested in an improvement in this area. If it makes things easier, I can discuss this via email and upload an application I'm working on as an example. (Multiple large apps I'm working on exhibit this behavior)
Thanks again for your help.
Regards,
Jim

OBI Enterprise Edition hierarchical levels definition - nQSError: 10058

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for