OBWW - Define Accounts for With Holding Tax to be paid over

Hi All
I am unable to activate Rules and assign accounts in TCode OBWW (Define accounts for with holding tax to be paid over) as the screen is greyed out.
Please guide me
Rgds
KIM Khan

Hi
You may in the same screen in another window.
Regards
Murad

Similar Messages

  • Form for with holding tax

    Hi guys,
    What is the form for with holding tax? I am working on TDS print certificate. Here it is given as J_1IEWT_CERT. But this is not a form, it is a report.
    Can you help me please?
    bye
    Kiran

    Hi kiran,
    try this script for withholding tax HR_TH_TAX_50B_04.
    Regards
    Saurabh

  • Regarding the Grossing up Method for With holding Tax

    Hi
    I am implementing SAP ECC 6.0. I am having a specific requirement with regard to With holding TAX. If i configure the WT, the tax amount will be deducted from the invoice & posted to a separate GL account. But in My case, the WT amount should be posted to a GL Account and the amount should not be deducted from the vendor account.
    This arises in case of foreign payments

    Try following this guide for Defining Withholding Tax Formulas
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/7b/5d823ae35c3769e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    and this one Defining Withholding Tax Types and Withholding Tax Codes
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/8e/5a823a89569e68e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    This may help you!

  • GL account wise With Holding Tax

    Dear All,
    We would like to know, is there any table where we will able to get the data for gl code wise document numbers along with with holding tax code.
    Regards
    Anilkumar

    Hi
    I have gone through "BSEG" and "With_Item". I am not able to find the with holding tax data in "Bseg", where as in "with_item", there is no information for GL account
    Is there any other table ?
    Regards
    Anilkumar

  • Validation for Business place and section for With holding tax

    Dear friends
    I defined validation for MIRO with respect to Business place and Section code to make mandatory, it is working fine.
    But in case of F-47 / F-48 and FB60 I defined validation but not working.
    Please help me in this regard
    Thanks in advance
    Kiran A

    Hi
    Your query is not clear? What is the prerequisite and check you have defined in validation rule? I doubt that in prerequisite you have defined the T Code MIRO. Pls check and assing the other T Codes also if that is the case.
    Regards
    Sanil K Bhandari

  • Number group not maintained for WITH HOLDING TAX challan

    Dera frends can you help in solving the problem.
    I have configured WHT it is posting well in vendor a/c and posting in tax account too. but while executing remittence challan System giving message " number group not maintained for CO code xyz section IEQEWT! and business places 194c.
    where company code - XYZ
    official withholding tax code - 194c
    business place EWT1.

    Hi
    Pls follow the path
    IMG>Financial Accounting (New)>Withholding Tax>Extended Withholding Tax>Postings>Certificate Numbering for Withholding Tax
    Pls assign points if the information is useful to you
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • Table names for with holding tax

    Hi all,
    please can any body tellme  few  table names  for withholding tax
    thanks

    hii...
    you can use...
    A399                           Withholding tax code - country-specific
    others are
    /CCEE/FISISTGRD                Reasons for Reversal enabling to change t
    /CCEE/SIFICUSTPR               Mapping table for customer procedure numb
    A399                           Withholding tax code - country-specific
    BSIUDTT                        HR-US: BSI test data (tax record)
    BTXEMPT                        BSI: Employee tax results
    BTXERES                        BSI: Employee/Employer tax
    CIMSYN                         Syntax Description for Extensions
    COMC_R3_FIELDS                 Assignment of R/3 material master fields
    CRMRDTRMSG                     Check Results Management: Texts of Messag
    DFKKARREPCONTST                ARGENTINA: Legal report sales tax control
    EDISYN                         Syntax Description for Extended Basic Typ
    EDSYN                          IDoc syntax after 3.0
    ETXDCH                         External tax document: header info
    ETXDCI                         External tax document: line item info
    ETXDCJ                         Ext. tax document: tax rates and amounts
    regards

  • With holding tax

    Hi,
    If  i  select With holding  tab  when   entering Down payment request,Down payment and invoice for vendor,  i  am getting error message as  Withholding Tax information missing from line item
    Could you advise me where i made wrong cogfiguration for with holding tax.
    Your immediate response will be highly appreciated.
    With regards,
    V.K

    Hi
    Check Feild status group of G067 in OB14 and make sure that these are optional and also the Feild status group of WHT GL accounts you have assigned.
    There is always a possibility that these are in suppressed state.
    Award points if useful.
    sarma

  • With holding Tax Remitence challan - CIN Version

    Hai!
    this is regarding the creation of remittance challan for with holding tax. some documents are not being picked in the challan remittance( j1inchln). Cheeked with the table with_item for those documents it is clear that no challan has been generated.
    When checked with the bsik table the document does not contains any value.
    Section code is updated in the doucments. Vendor Masters are also ok regarding the with holding tax.
    Can you please tell me the possible ways to solve this.
    Thanks!
    Rajesh

    Hi!
    Thanks! Mr.LaxmiNarayana, I checked up with the FSG of Tax accounts and document contains section codes.
    Can you please tell what is Bsik Table is for?
    thanks
    Rajesh

  • India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval

    Dear All
    Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
    Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
    (ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
    Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
    Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
    Regards
    Anilkumar

    Please go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
    also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • Define Accounts for Tax Clearing

    Dear all,
    I have to Define Accounts for Tax Clearing but I don't understand business that use this account
    Please give me a example about business that use this account
    Thanks so much
    Minhtb

    Hi,
    I would like to explain it with an examble (it is in India),
    We have a tax element called Excise Duty which will be levied on all material sales.  In india, there is a option to utilise the purchase related Excise Duties against the Excise duty payable on sales.  For utilising this, we have to maintain all excise related records.  To ensure the accounting of purchase related duties, companies are puting a control that the invoice verification (MIRO) can be done only if the incoming duty is
    accounted.
    At this place tax clearing accounts are used.  Here at the time of accounting duty the tax clearing account will be credited and at the time of MIRO the tax clearing account will be debited.  Hence, the balance is Zero.
    Examble,
    Procurement cycle,
    1. Goods receipts (MIGO)
    Dr. Inventory a/c
    Cr. GR/IR Account
    2. Excise duty (J1IEX)
    Dr. Duty Input a/c
    Cr. Tax clearing account
    3. Invoice verification (MIRO)
    Dr. GR/IR  a/c
    Dr. Tax clearing a/c
    Cr. Vendor a/c
    There is an another chance of creating a liability at the time of transaction will hit a tax clearing account and at the time of payment it will clear the tax account.
    Hope it clears your doubt
    Regards
    A.Saravanan

  • Optional With holding tax for a vendor

    Dear All,
    I want to make the with holding tax optional during MIRO.
    I have already assign the tax code in vendor master and so it automatically deduct withholding tax.
    But my vendor is a supplier as well as a broker for me. So when i want to pay him Brokerage I want automatic tax deduction which is happening but when i want to pay him for the material which he supplied to me also the tax get automatically deducted.
    Can any body help me on this?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rakesh

    Hi Milind
    Appreciate your prompt response, I am looking for information on what needs to be done for implementing with holding tax for Puerto Rico, May be I was wrong when I said I could not find any links on this subject either in SAP Help or else where. What I could not find was Information specific to Puerto Rico withholding tax. We normally have lots of information on WithHolding tax in SAP help and else where on the net.
    I am looking for information specific to WithHolding tax for Puerto Rico.
    Regards
    KIM Khan

  • How to creat the Varient for 1099MISC With Holding Tax

    How to create the Variant for 1099MISC With Holding Tax ?

    HI,
    please follow the below steps to create variant at report.
    tcode se38
    report RFIDYYWT
    pass all the parameters
    press save icon
    give variant name
    retrive the variant in report
    tcode se38
    report name RFIDYYWT
    press : shift + F5
    or get varinat icon.
    I hope above will resolve your issue.
    Regards
    Madhu M

  • Change with holding tax for vendor

    Hi all,
    I have a requirement of chnaging withholding tax for exisitng vendor. Is it possible to achive this using any function module or BAPI and ateast by BDC or LSMW ??
    Best suggestions will be rewarded with points.
    Sivaprasad

    Hi Sivaprsad,
          You can change the with holding tax data by using BDC. because, it having table control, so it's easy to update code in BDC.
    Hope, it will help you.
    Thanks,
    Poonam.

Maybe you are looking for